Laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy

Major Hepatobiliary Surgery during Pregnancy: Safety and Timing

Hepatobiliary disease, although rare, may present during pregnancy with potential complications for mother and fetus. We present two cases of choledochal cysts and one case of a hepatic adenoma diagnosed in gravid patients. All three patients had acute events or failed medical management and were successfully treated with open resection, excision, or reconstruction during the second or third trimesters of pregnancy without requiring blood transfusions or tocolytic therapy. Although conservative treatment may be indicated in select patients due to the risk of underlying disease, we recommend surgical treatment preferably in the second trimester. With diligent intra- and postoperative management, pregnant patients can safely proceed with major hepatobiliary surgery.

Laparoscopy in the second trimester of pregnancy

Advances in laparoscopic surgery have led to the development of methods to perform traditionally major abdominal surgery and reduce morbidity using minimally invasive surgery techniques. Because a growing number of reports in the literature have suggested its safe use, laparoscopy is being performed in pregnancy with increasing frequency in many centers. Any surgeon treating pregnant patients must have a thorough understanding of the physiology of the pregnant patient and risks and benefits of the surgical procedure. This article discusses the use of laparoscopy in pregnancy focusing on the physiologic changes induced by pregnancy relevant to laparoscopy. Strategies to reduce the risk of complications while performing laparoscopy on a pregnant patient are discussed.

Laparoscopic Appendectomy after 30 Weeks Pregnancy: Report of Two Cases and Description of Technique

Appendicitis and pregnancy are both common conditions, and when they co-exist, both the general surgeon and obstetrician are presented with unique challenges. Acute appendicitis is the most common cause of the acute abdomen during pregnancy, effecting 0.1–0.3 per cent of pregnancies each year. With an estimated 4 million deliveries per year in the United States, there are potentially as many as 12,000 cases of acute appendicitis to be managed by the general surgeon during pregnancy (Eur J Surg 1992;158:603–6; Curr Surg 2003;60:164–73). Laparoscopic appendectomy has become a routine procedure and is now widely performed in North America. Although laparoscopic appendectomy has been discussed during pregnancy, limited data is available on the role of laparoscopic appendectomy in the third trimester of pregnancy. In fact, some authors have advocated a gestational age of 26–28 weeks to be the upper gestational limit for successful completion of laparoscopic surgery (Obstet Gynecol Surg 2001;56:50–9). In this paper, we present two recent cases of successful laparoscopic appendectomy during late pregnancy without immediate complication to mother or fetus and a description of our operative technique.

Steroid cell tumour not otherwise specified during pregnancy: a case report and diagnostic work-up for virilisation in a pregnant patient

Steroid cell tumours not otherwise specified are rare ovarian tumours, which can cause foetal and maternal virilisation. This is the first case report that describes a steroid cell tumour not otherwise specified during pregnancy. Differential diagnosis, a diagnostic work-up and treatment are discussed.

Outcome in laparoscopic management of persistent adnexal mass during the second trimester of pregnancy

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the safety of laparoscopic management for persistent adnexal mass in the second trimester of pregnancy.

METHODS

Between April 1994 and March 2003, 67 consecutive women underwent laparoscopic removal of adnexal masses that had persisted into the second trimester of pregnancy in an academic tertiary referral center. Operative complications, pregnancy, and labor outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median gestation was 10.5 weeks (range, 5-25 weeks) at diagnosis and 16 weeks (range, 12-25 weeks) at the time of operation. Only two women required for conversion to laparotomy. Cystectomy was performed for 55 women, oophorectomy for 9 women and fenestration in 3 women. There were no intraoperative complications or major postoperative complications. No women were given tocolytic therapy, and none experienced uterine contractions. There was one spontaneous abortion 6 weeks after the operation, and one patent was lost to follow up. Of the remaining 65 women, the median gestation at delivery was 39 weeks (range, 33-42 weeks), and the median birthweight was 3,160 g (range, 2,220-4,200 g).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparosocpic surgery for persistent adnexal masses in the second trimester of pregnancy is safe when performed by experienced surgeons.

Management of general surgical problems in the pregnant patient

BACKGROUND

General surgeons are frequently consulted for nonobstetrical surgical problems in pregnant women, as up to 2% of pregnancies are complicated by such problems. Concerns over the increased morbidity for both the pregnant patient and the fetus are unique to this population.

DATA SOURCES

A review of the English language literature surrounding nonobstetrical surgical issues was collected through a Medline search and review of relevant society and academy papers.

CONCLUSIONS

This manuscript offers a review of current information regarding aspects of surgical care in the pregnant patient. Areas discussed include anesthesiology, radiology, laparoscopy, and specific common and uncommon surgical diseases found in the pregnant patient.

Gynaecological malignancies in pregnancy: a review

Gynaecological malignancies frequently occur in women of reproductive age and are estimated to complicate approximately one in 1000 pregnancies. The incidence of gynaecological malignancies during pregnancy is expected to rise as more women delay childbearing into their later reproductive years, and maternal age is the most powerful predictor of cancer risk. Pregnancy-associated malignancies present significant challenges as a result of the conflict between optimal maternal therapy and fetal well-being. The lack of prospective randomised treatment studies has prevented the development of clinical guidelines for most of the issues complicating the management. In the present review, recent diagnostic and treatment strategies for cervical, ovarian, vulvar and endometrial carcinomas during pregnancy are presented.

The Impact of Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques

The use of minimally invasive techniques (MIT) in patient care is well documented in ancient history; however, it was not until the 1990s that advancements in technology enabled surgeons to realize the true potential of this approach. The minimally invasive approach has revolutionized surgical care, significantly reducing postoperative pain, recovery time, and hospital stays with marked improvements in cosmetic outcome and overall cost-effectiveness. It is now used around the world and in all major fields of surgery, compelling changes in training programs in order to assure quality control and patient safety. The bond between surgeons practicing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and the high-tech industry is of utmost importance to future developments. Surgical robotic systems represent the most technologically advanced product of this collaboration, and their potential application in MIS shows much promise. As technology advances, additional developments in MIT are likely.

Laparoscopy for appendicitis and cholelithiasis during pregnancy: a new standard of care

BACKGROUND

Subsequent to a report from the authors' institution, the laparoscopic management of symptomatic cholelithiasis and appendicitis during pregnancy has become the standard of care at LDS Hospital using institutional guidelines. For comparison with previous outcomes described by the authors, 59 additional laparoscopic cases are reported.

METHODS

Medical records of all pregnant patients at LDS Hospital who underwent open or laparoscopic cholecystectomy or appendectomy between 1998 and 2002 were reviewed. The outcomes were compared with the authors' previous data.

RESULTS

The laparoscopic management of symptomatic cholelithiasis and appendicitis during pregnancy increased from 54% to 97%. No significant differences in preterm delivery rates, birth weights, or 5-min Apgar scores were found between the two periods. No birth defects or uterine injuries occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

With the use of the authors' guidelines, laparoscopy has become the standard of care for managing symptomatic cholelithiasis and appendicitis during pregnancy at LDS Hospital without significant increase in morbidity or mortality.

[About two cases of uterine rupture outside of labour: consequences of an unnoticed previous perforation]

The uterine mute perforation following uterine evacuation of pregnancy exists; the obstetrical consequences of these are quite unknown. We report 2 cases of pregnancy complicated by uterine rupture and defect after uterine mute perforation. The physical signs are late and misleading. The notion of perforation during the instrumental evacuation of pregnancy must be mentioned for an adequate follow-up. Management thus remains essentially preventive.

Laparoscopic management of adnexal masses: a gold standard?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review recent literature on the laparoscopic management of adnexal masses, when this approach may be considered as a gold standard.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cyst rupture was recently demonstrated to be a significant prognostic factor in stage I invasive epithelial carcinoma, and it was recommended to restrict the laparoscopic approach to patients with preoperative evidence that the cyst was benign. The laparoscopic approach is still highly controversial in masses suspicious at ultrasound. The limits of the laparoscopic approach are discussed reviewing recent literature and our experience. The laparoscopic management of adnexal masses appears to be safe in most hospitals even in developing countries. This approach is being used with increasing frequency in unusual indications such as newborns, children, adolescents and pregnant women. The learning curve for endoscopic surgery appears to be longer than expected. Many patients with benign adnexal masses, such as ovarian endometrioma, are still treated by laparotomy or with an inadequate endoscopic technique. Several studies have suggested that the stripping technique is a tissue-sparing procedure.

SUMMARY

The laparoscopic puncture of malignant ovarian tumours confined to the ovaries is uncommon, and should be avoided whenever possible. The teaching of endoscopy is essential to promote adequate procedures performed according to the principles of microsurgery and to preserve postoperative ovarian physiology.

Safety and risks of laparoscopy in pregnancy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to evaluate the indications, and the safety and efficacy of operative laparoscopy in pregnancy with a particular attention to the pregnancy outcome.

RECENT FINDINGS

Hemodynamics changes during laparoscopic surgery in pregnancy are similar to those observed in the nonpregnant state. The procedure appears to be safe and reduces hospital admissions and frequency of premature labor. The safest time to perform laparoscopic surgery in pregnancy is at the second trimester. However, it can be complicated by injury to the gravid uterus and pregnancy loss. This is illustrated by a recent report of accidental gas insufflation into the amniotic cavity leading to the fetal loss.

SUMMARY

The most common indications of laparoscopy in pregnancy are cholelithiasis, appendicitis, persistent ovarian cyst and adnexal torsion. In general, it is associated with a good maternal and fetal outcome. The occurrence of a miscarriage, premature labor or fetal death appears to be related to the underlying pathology, independent of the operative intervention. Due to the displacement of the appendix by the gravid uterus and the physiologic elevation of white blood cell count in pregnancy, diagnosis of appendicitis in pregnancy can be delayed with its sequelle. In one report, the incidence of fetal loss is 1.5% in uncomplicated appendicitis and 35% in the presence of ruptured appendicitis. Similarly, the fetal loss rate in uncomplicated cholecystectomy is 4%, but the fetal mortality in gallstone pacreatitis could be up to 60%. Laparoscopy in pregnancy should be performed with utmost care. In the second trimester of pregnancy, open laparoscopic approach is strongly recommended.

Diagnosis and management of pheochromocytoma during pregnancy

Although the presence of pheochromocytoma in pregnancy is extremely rare, this association deserves much attention as the tumor constitutes a very high risk for both mother and fetus. Any pregnant woman with hypertension, especially if paroxysmal or labile, or with so far unexplained "spells", should induce the clinician to consider the possibility of a pheochromocytoma. Maternal and fetal survival depend a lot on an early diagnosis, a correct medical therapy and a correct timing of delivery and surgery. In this respect, a strict collaboration between obstetricians, endocrinologists, anesthesiologists and surgeons is pivotal.