Clinical and economic outcomes of hospital acquired pneumonia in intra-abdominal surgery patients

Guideline-adherent initial intravenous antibiotic therapy for hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated pneumonia is clinically superior, saves lives and is cheaper than non guideline adherent therapy

INTRODUCTION

Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) often occurring as ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most frequent hospital infection in intensive care units (ICU). Early adequate antimicrobial therapy is an essential determinant of clinical outcome. Organisations like the German PEG or ATS/ IDSA provide guidelines for the initial calculated treatment in the absence of pathogen identification. We conducted a retrospective chart review for patients with HAP/VAP and assessed whether the initial intravenous antibiotic therapy (IIAT) was adequate according to the PEG guidelines.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We collected data from 5 tertiary care hospitals. Electronic data filtering identified 895 patients with potential HAP/VAP. After chart review we finally identified 221 patients meeting the definition of HAP/VAP. Primary study endpoints were clinical improvement, survival and length of stay. Secondary endpoints included duration of mechanical ventilation, total costs, costs incurred on the intensive care unit (ICU), costs incurred on general wards and drug costs.

RESULTS

We found that 107 patients received adequate initial intravenous antibiotic therapy (IIAT) vs. 114 with inadequate IIAT according to the PEG guidelines. Baseline characteristics of both groups revealed no significant differences and good comparability. Clinical improvement was 64% over all patients and 82% (85/104) in the subpopulation with adequate IIAT while only 47% (48/103) inadequately treated patients improved (p< 0.001). The odds ratio of therapeutic success with GA versus NGA treatment was 5.821 (p<0.001, [95% CI: 2.712-12.497]). Survival was 80% for the total population (n = 221), 86% in the adequately treated (92/107) and 74% in the inadequately treated subpopulation (84/114) (p = 0.021). The odds ratio of mortality for GA vs. NGA treatment was 0.565 (p=0.117, [95% CI: 0.276-1.155]). Adequately treated patients had a significantly shorter length of stay (LOS) (23.9 vs. 28.3 days; p = 0.022), require significantly less hours of mechanical ventilation (175 vs. 274; p = 0.001), incurred lower total costs (EUR 28,033 vs. EUR 36,139, p = 0.006) and lower ICU-related costs (EUR 13,308 vs. EUR 18,666, p = 0.003). Drug costs for the hospital stay were also lower (EUR 4,069 vs. EUR 4,833) yet not significant. The most frequent types of inadequate therapy were monotherapy instead of combination therapy, wrong type of penicillin and wrong type of cephalosporin.

DISCUSSION

These findings are consistent with those from other studies analyzing the impact of guideline adherence on survival rates, clinical success, LOS and costs. However, inadequately treated patients had a higher complicated pathogen risk score (CPRS) compared to those who received adequate therapy. This shows that therapy based on local experiences may be sufficient for patients with low CPRS but inadequate for those with high CPRS. Linear regression models showed that single items of the CPRS like extrapulmonary organ failure or late onset had no significant influence on the results.

CONCLUSION

Guideline-adherent initial intravenous antibiotic therapy is clinically superior, saves lives and is less expensive than non guideline adherent therapy. Using a CPRS score can be a useful tool to determine the right choice of initial intravenous antibiotic therapy. The net effect on the German healthcare system per year is estimated at up to 2,042 lives and EUR 125,819,000 saved if guideline-adherent initial therapy for HAP/VAP were established in all German ICUs.

Costs of hospital-acquired infection and transferability of the estimates: a systematic review

Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) present a substantial problem for healthcare providers, with a relatively high frequency of occurrence and considerable damage caused. There has been an increase in the number of cost-effectiveness and cost-savings analyses of HAI control measures, and the quantification of the cost of HAI (COHAI) is necessary for such calculations. While recent guidelines allow researchers to utilize COHAI estimates from existing published literature when evaluating the economic impact of HAI control measures, it has been observed that the results of economic evaluations may not be directly applied to other jurisdictions due to differences in the context and circumstances in which the original results were produced. The aims of this study were to conduct a systematic review of published studies that have produced COHAI estimates from 1980 to 2006 and to evaluate the quality of these estimates from the perspective of transferability. From a total of 89 publications, only eight papers (9.0%) had a high level of transferability in which all components of costs were described, data for costs in each component were reported, and unit costs were estimated with actual costing. We also did not observe a higher citation level for studies with high levels of transferability. We feel that, in order to ensure an appropriate contribution to the infection control program decision-making process, it is essential for researchers who estimate COHAI, analysts who use COHAI estimates for decision-making, as well as relevant journal reviewers and editors to recognize the importance of a transferability paradigm.

Outcomes of damage-control celiotomy in elderly nontrauma patients with intra-abdominal catastrophes

OBJECTIVE

Damage-control laparotomy, initially developed for trauma patients, has expanded into the general surgery arena. Little evidence exists regarding the utility of damage-control celiotomy (DCCT) in elderly nontrauma patients. Our objective was to review the management and outcomes of DCCT in elderly patients with intra-abdominal catastrophes.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review from 1998 to 2008 identified cases of DCCT. Demographics, comorbidities, surgical techniques, morbidity, long-term disposition, and mortality were analyzed.

RESULTS

From 210 patients with emergency surgeries, 88 (42%) patients with DCCT were identified, 33 (38%) were greater than 65 years old and 55 (63%) were ≤ 65 years old. The average APACHE IV score for the elderly was 84 ± 2 versus 68 ± 2 for the younger group (p < .001). Elderly patients had significantly higher comorbidites with respect to cardiovascular, pulmonary, and renal disease. When comparing the 2 groups, there were no significant differences in-hospital or intensive care unit lengths of stay or ventilator days. There were also no significant differences in complications and disposition. Using Cox proportional hazards analysis, age was not an independent predictor of 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Age is not an independent predictor of worse outcomes in patients managed by the DCCT technique after intra-abdominal catastrophes. This management technique should be considered for elderly patients who require DCCT.

Antibiotic optimization in the difficult-to-treat patient with complicated intra-abdominal or complicated skin and skin structure infections: focus on tigecycline

Complicated intra-abdominal and skin and skin structure infections are widely varied in presentation. These infections very often lead to an increase in length of hospital stay, with a resulting increase in costs and mortality. In addition, these infections may be caused by a wide variety of bacteria and are often polymicrobial with the possibility of the presence of antimicrobial-resistant strains, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, extended-spectrum β-lactamase strains (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae), and K. pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing strains. In combination with patients’ immunosuppression or comorbidities, the treatment and management options for initial therapy success are few. Tigecycline, a new glycylcyline antimicrobial from the tetracycline drug class, represents a viable option for the successful treatment of these infections. It has been shown to have activity against a wide variety of bacteria, including the antimicrobial-resistant strains. As with all tetracycline drugs, it is not recommended for pregnant or nursing women. The potential side effects are those typical of tetracycline drugs: nausea, vomiting, and headaches. Drug–drug interactions are not expected, and renal function monitoring is not necessary.

Risk-adjusted increases in medical resource utilization associated with health care-associated infections in gastrectomy patients

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

Quantifying the impact of health care-associated infections (HAIs) on medical resource utilization is necessary for payers and providers to appropriately allocate limited resources for interventions. However, previous studies tend to involve single institutions and do not take into account patient and practice variations between several hospitals. The objective of this study was to conduct a multi-institutional risk-adjusted comparison of HAI-associated impact on medical resources in gastrectomy patients in Japan.

METHODS

Health care-associated infections were identified using a combination of International Classification of Diseases-10 codes and antibiotic utilization patterns in 1058 gastrectomy patients from 10 Japanese hospitals. Multiple linear regression models and risk adjustment were used to analyse the impact of HAIs on: (1) total hospital costs; (2) antibiotic costs; and (3) post-surgical length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS

Overall HAI incidence for the database was 20.3%, with a range of 8.8-29.6% among the 10 hospitals. Regression models showed that HAIs were significantly associated with increases in all three indicators. Risk-adjusted comparisons revealed that HAIs were associated with an increase of US$2767 (range: US$1035-6513) in overall hospital cost, US$202 (US$98.8-764.6) antibiotic costs and 10.6 (4.7-24 days) post-surgical LOS days.

CONCLUSIONS

Even after adjusting for patient characteristics and other variables, there was still a high degree of variation observed in the impact of HAIs on total hospital costs and antibiotic costs from a third-party payer's perspective and post-surgical LOS among the 10 hospitals. This information can increase the efficiency of allocation of resources for interventions to reduce HAIs.

A systems approach to the prevention of surgical infections

Infection after surgery continues to be a major source of morbidity and expense despite extensive efforts with educational programs, guidelines, and hospital-based policies and procedures. The public and the government are demanding better performance and greater accountability. Our system operations within our institutions have failed. We need to adopt a culture dedicated to quality control through better information technology and data-driven initiatives to achieve improved clinical outcomes from infectious complications in surgery.

[Evaluation of the status of patients with severe infection, criteria for intensive care unit admittance. Spanish Society for Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology. Spanish Society of Intensive and Critical Medicine and Coronary Units]

Recent studies have shown that early attention in patients with serious infections is associated with a better outcome. Assistance in intensive care units (ICU) can effectively provide this attention; hence patients should be admitted to the ICU as soon as possible, before clinical deterioration becomes irreversible. The objective of this article is to compile the recommendations for evaluating disease severity in patients with infections and describe the criteria for ICU admission, updating the criteria published 10 years ago. A literature review was carried out, compiling the opinions of experts from the Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (SEIMC, Spanish Society for Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology) and the Sociedad Española de Medicina Intensiva, Crítica y Unidades Coronarias (SEMICYUC, Spanish Society for Intensive Medicine, Critical Care and Coronary Units) as well as the working groups for infections in critically ill patients (GEIPC-SEIMC and GTEI-SEMICYUC). We describe the specific recommendations for ICU admission related to the most common infections affecting patients, who will potentially benefit from critical care. Assessment of the severity of the patient's condition to enable early intensive care is stressed.

Predictors of prolonged length of stay after major elective head and neck surgery

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS

Longer length of stay (LOS) after elective surgery is associated with an increased use of health care resources and higher costs. The objectives of this study were to determine the perioperative factors that predict a prolonged LOS after elective major head and neck operations and to test the hypothesis that factors related to process of care (intra- and postoperative) independently predict prolonged LOS after adjustment for preoperative patient characteristics.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective hospital-based cohort study.

METHODS

The National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program data were accessed for seven head and neck operations: radical neck dissection (RND) (n = 398), modified RND (n = 891), total laryngectomy (n = 431), total laryngectomy with RND (n = 747), hemiglossectomy with unilateral RND (n = 201), composite resection (n = 105), and composite resection with RND (n = 312). Prolonged LOS was defined as exceeding the 75th percentile for the LOS distribution of each operation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors that predicted prolonged LOS.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight variables were analyzed among 3,050 patients who qualified for inclusion. Preoperative patient characteristics that predicted prolonged LOS were older age, poorer functional status, consumption of more than two drinks of alcohol per day, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and diabetes mellitus. Intraoperative processes that predicted prolonged LOS were a longer operative time and transfusion of erythrocytes. The postoperative variables that predicted a prolonged LOS were a return to the operating room within 30 days of the index operation and the occurrence of two or more operative complications.

CONCLUSION

Several intraoperative processes and postoperative adverse events contributed additional predictive information for prolonged LOS, after consideration of preoperative patient characteristics.

Prolonged rehospitalizations following renal transplantation: causes, risk factors, and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Although some studies have described rehospitalization after transplantation, few have focused on risk factors and consequences of prolonged hospital stay. Our goal was to determine the causes, risk factors, and outcomes of prolonged rehospitalizations after renal transplantation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, 574 randomly selected rehospitalization records of kidney transplant recipients were reviewed from 1994 to 2006. Admissions were divided into group 1, prolonged stay (length of stay >14 days, n=149), and group II, short stay (length of stay <or=14 days, n=425). Demographic data, cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), cause of readmission, ICU admission, time interval between transplantation and rehospitalization, costs, and in-patient mortality were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Mean (+/-SD) hospital stay was 10.6 +/- 9.8 days. Median hospital stay was 5 days for renal stones, 7 days for surgical complications, 8 days for malignancy, 9 days for infection, and 10 days for renal dysfunction. We found higher rates of ESRD due to diabetes in group I (28% vs. 15.4%; P=.006). Admissions due to infections (56.4% vs 42.4%; P=.003) or renal dysfunctions (55% vs 41.4%; P=.004) were the cause of higher proportions of total hospitalizations with prolonged stay. Prolonged stay also correlated with higher ICU admissions (8.8% vs 2.8%; P=.002) and mortality (6.7% vs 3.05%; P=.001). Mean total hospital cost for short versus prolonged hospitalizations were US$ 586 versus US$ 2750, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we found that prolonged hospital stays accounted for >62% of all hospital costs; however, they comprised only 26% of the patients. High-risk kidney transplant recipients for prolonged hospitalizations should be closely observed for infections and graft rejection.