Conventional versus binding pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial

Preliminary results of binding pancreaticojejunostomy

Backgrounds/Aims

The post-operative complications and clinical course of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) largely depend on the pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ). Several methods of PJ are in clinical use. We analyzed the early results of binding pancreaticojejunostomy (BPJ), a technique reported by SY Peng.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical results of patients who received BPJ in Inha University Hospital from 2006 to 2011. 21 BPJs were performed with Peng's method. The definition of postoperative pancreatic fistula (PF) was a high amylase content (>3 times the upper normal serum value) of the drain fluid (of any measurable volume), at any time on or after the 3rd post-operative day. The pancreatic fistula was graded according to the International Study Group for Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) guidelines.

Results

Of the 21 patients who received BPJ, 11 were male. The median age was 61.2 years. PD surgery included 4 cases of Whipple's procedures and 17 cases of pylorus-preserving PD. According to the post-operative course, 16 patients recovered well with no evidence of PF. A total of 5 patients (23.8%), including 3 grade A PFs and 2 grade C PFs, suffered from a pancreatic fistula. 3 patients with grade A PF recovered with conservative management.

Conclusions

The BPJ appears to be a relatively safe procedure based on this preliminary study, but further study is needed to validate its safety.

Impact of reconstruction methods and pathological factors on survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy

Background:

Surgery remains the mainstay of therapy for pancreatic head (PH) and periampullary carcinoma (PC) and provides the only chance of cure. Improvements of surgical technique, increased surgical experience and advances in anesthesia, intensive care and parenteral nutrition have substantially decreased surgical complications and increased survival. We evaluate the effects of reconstruction type, complications and pathological factors on survival and quality of life.

Materials and Methods:

This is a prospective study to evaluate the impact of various reconstruction methods of the pancreatic remnant after pancreaticoduodenectomy and the pathological characteristics of PC patients over 3.5 years. Patient characteristics and descriptive analysis in the three variable methods either with or without stent were compared with Chi-square test. Multivariate analysis was performed with the logistic regression analysis test and multinomial logistic regression analysis test. Survival rate was analyzed by use Kaplan-Meier test.

Results:

Forty-one consecutive patients with PC were enrolled. There were 23 men (56.1%) and 18 women (43.9%), with a median age of 56 years (16 to 70 years). There were 24 cases of PH cancer, eight cases of PC, four cases of distal CBD cancer and five cases of duodenal carcinoma. Nine patients underwent duct-to-mucosa pancreatico jejunostomy (PJ), 17 patients underwent telescoping pancreatico jejunostomy (PJ) and 15 patients pancreaticogastrostomy (PG). The pancreatic duct was stented in 30 patients while in 11 patients, the duct was not stented. The PJ duct-to-mucosa caused significantly less leakage, but longer operative and reconstructive times. Telescoping PJ was associated with the shortest hospital stay. There were 5 postoperative mortalities, while postoperative morbidities included pancreatic fistula-6 patients, delayed gastric emptying in-11, GI fistula-3, wound infection-12, burst abdomen-6 and pulmonary infection-2. Factors that predisposed to development of pancreatic leakage included male gender, preoperative albumin < 30g/dl, pre-operative hemoglobin < 10g/dl and non PJ-duct to mucosa type of reconstruction. The ampullary cancers presented at an earlier stage and had a better prognosis than pancreatic cancer and cholangiocarcinoma. Early stage (I and II), negative surgical margin, well and moderate differentiation and absence of lymph node involvement significantly predicted for longer survival.

Conclusions:

PJ duct-to-mucosa anastomosis was safe, caused least pancreatic leakage and least blood loss compared with the other methods of reconstruction and was associated with early return back to home and prolonged disease free and overall survival.

Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Risk factors, clinical predictors, and management (single center experience)

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains a challenge even at high-volume centers.

METHODS

This study was designed to analyze perioperative risk factors for POPF after PD and evaluate the factors that predict the extent and severity of leak. Demographic data, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 471 consecutive patients underwent PD in our center. Fifty-seven patients (12.1 %) developed a POPF of any type; 21 patients (4.5 %) had a fistula type A, 22 patients (4.7 %) had a fistula type B, and the remaining 14 patients (3 %) had a POPF type C. Cirrhotic liver (P = 0.05), BMI > 25 kg/m(2) (P = 0.0001), soft pancreas (P = 0.04), pancreatic duct diameter <3 mm (0.0001), pancreatic duct located <3 mm from the posterior border (P = 0.02) were significantly associated with POPF. With the multivariate analysis, both BMI and pancreatic duct diameter were demonstrated to be independent factors. The hospital mortality in this series was 11 patients (2.3 %), and the development of POPF type C was associated with a significantly increased mortality (7/14 patients). The following factors were predictors of clinically evident POPF: a postoperative day (POD) 1 and 5 drain amylase level >4,000 IU/L, WBC, pancreatic duct diameter <3 mm, and pancreatic texture.

CONCLUSIONS

Cirrhotic liver, BMI, soft pancreas, pancreatic duct diameter <3 mm, pancreatic duct near the posterior border are risk factors for development of POPF. In addition a drain amylase level >4,000 IU/L on POD 1 and 5, WBC, pancreatic duct diameter, pancreatic texture may be predictors of POPF B, C.

Wound healing after mesh inner embedding and outer binding pancreaticojejunostomy in piglets

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to introduce a novel technique of pancreaticojejunostomy, namely, mesh inner embedding and outer binding pancreaticojejunostomy, and to evaluate wound healing after this operation in piglets.

METHODS

Thirty-six domestic piglets were randomly divided into 2 groups after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the mesh inner embedding and outer binding pancreaticojejunostomy group (n = 18) and the conventional double-deck invaginated pancreaticojejunostomy group (n = 18). Bursting pressure and breaking strength were assessed on the operative day and on days 7 and 14 postoperatively. The pathologic findings and collagen content of the anastomotic site were evaluated on days 7 and 14 postoperatively.

RESULTS

Both the bursting pressure and breaking strength were significantly higher in the mesh inner embedding and outer binding pancreaticojejunostomy group than in the double-deck invaginated pancreaticojejunostomy group on days 0, 7, and 14 (P < .01). The collagen content of the anastomotic site was significantly higher in the mesh inner embedding and outer binding pancreaticojejunostomy group than in the double-deck invaginated pancreaticojejunostomy group on days 7 and 14 postoperatively (P < .01). The anastomotic site was more completely repaired by connective and granulation tissue in the mesh inner embedding and outer binding pancreaticojejunostomy group on day 7 than in the double-deck invaginated pancreaticojejunostomy group.

CONCLUSION

Mesh inner embedding and outer binding pancreaticojejunostomy significantly enhanced the anastomotic firmness and sped up the wound healing process compared with conventional mesh inner embedding and outer binding pancreaticojejunostomy. Therefore, it may decrease the risk of pancreatic fistulas after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Impact of cirrhosis on surgical outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy

AIM: To elucidate surgical outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in patients with liver cirrhosis.

METHODS: We studied retrospectively all patients who underwent PD in our centre between January 2002 and December 2011. Group A comprised patients with cirrhotic livers, and Group B comprised patients with non-cirrhotic livers. The cirrhotic patients had Child-Pugh classes A and B (patient’s score less than 8). Preoperative demographic data, intra-operative data and postoperative details were collected. The primary outcome measure was hospital mortality rate. Secondary outcomes analysed included duration of the operation, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative morbidity and survival rate.

RESULTS: Only 67/442 patients (15.2%) had cirrhotic livers. Intraoperative blood loss and blood transfusion were significantly higher in group A (P = 0.0001). The mean surgical time in group A was significantly longer than that in group B (P = 0.0001). Wound complications (P = 0.02), internal haemorrhage (P = 0.05), pancreatic fistula (P = 0.02) and hospital mortality (P = 0.0001) were significantly higher in the cirrhotic patients. Postoperative stay was significantly longer in group A (P = 0.03). The median survival was 19 mo in group A and 24 mo in group B. Portal hypertension (PHT) was present in 16/67 cases of cirrhosis (23.9%). The intraoperative blood loss and blood transfusion were significantly higher in patients with PHT (P = 0.001). Postoperative morbidity (0.07) and hospital mortality (P = 0.007) were higher in cirrhotic patients with PHT.

CONCLUSION: Patients with periampullary tumours and well-compensated chronic liver disease should be routinely considered for PD at high volume centres with available expertise to manage liver cirrhosis. PD is associated with an increased risk of postoperative morbidity in patients with liver cirrhosis; therefore, it is only recommended in patients with Child A cirrhosis without portal hypertension.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the duodenum: Surgical management and survival results

AIM: To provide long-term survival results of operable duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (DGISTs) in a tertiary center in China.

METHODS: In this retrospective study, the pathological data of 28 patients with DGISTs who had been treated surgically at the Second Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital (SRRSH) from June 1998 to December 2006 were reviewed. All pathological slides were examined by a single pathologist to confirm the diagnosis. In patients whose diagnosis was not confirmed by immunohistochemistry at the time of resection, representative paraffin blocks were reassembled, and sections were studied using antibodies against CD117 (c-kit), CD34, smooth muscle actin (SMA), vimentin, S-100, actin (HHF35), and desmin. Operative procedures were classified as wedge resection (WR, local resection with pure closure, without duodenal transection or anastomosis), segmental resection [SR, duodenal transection with Roux-Y or Billroth II gastrojejunostomy (G-J), end-to-end duodenoduodenostomy (D-D), end-to-end or end-to-side duodenojejunostomy (D-J)], and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD, Whipple operation with pancreatojejunostomy). R0 resection was pursued in all cases, and at least R1 resection was achieved. Regional lymphadenectomy was not performed. Clinical manifestations, surgery, medical treatment and follow-up data were retrospectively analyzed. Related studies in the literature were reviewed.

RESULTS: There were 12 males and 16 females patients, with a median age of 53 years (20-76 years). Their major complaints were “gastrointestinal bleeding” (57.2%) and “nonspecific discomfort” (32.1%). About 14.3%, 60.7%, 17.9%, and 7.1% of the tumors originated in the first to fourth portion, respectively, with a median size of 5.8 cm (1.6-20 cm). Treatment was by WR in 5 cases (17.9%), SR in 13 cases (46.4%), and by PD in 10 cases (35.7%). The morbidity and mortality rates were 35.7% and 3.6%, respectively. The median post-operative stay was 14.5 d (5-47 d). During a follow-up of 61 (23-164) mo, the 2-year and 5-year relapse-free survival was 83.3% and 50%, respectively. Eighty-four related articles were reviewed.

CONCLUSION: Surgeons can choose to perform limited resection or PD for operable DGISTs if clear surgical margins are achieved. Comprehensive treatment is necessary.

Triple-layer duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy with resection of jejunal serosa decreased pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic fistula (PF) is one of the most common complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). We described a new method of pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) developed by combining triple-layer duct-to-mucosa PJ with resection of jejunal serosa, which was named as modified layer-to-layer PJ (MLLPJ). The aim of the present study was to observe whether the new technique would effectively reduce the PF rate in comparison with two-layer duct-to-mucosa PJ (TLPJ).

METHODS

Data on 184 consecutive patients who underwent the two methods of PJ after standard PD between January 1, 2010 and January 31, 2013 were collected retrospectively from a prospective database. The primary endpoint was the PF rate. The risk factors of PF were investigated by using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 88 patients received TLPJ and 96 underwent MLLPJ. Rate of PF for the entire cohort was 8.2%. There were 11 fistulas (12.5%) in the TLPJ group and four fistulas (4.2%) in the MLLPJ group (P = 0.039). Body mass index, pancreatic texture, pancreatic duct diameter, and methods of PJ anastomosis had significant effects on the formation of PF on univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that pancreatic duct diameter ≤3 mm and TLPJ were the significant risk factors of PF.

CONCLUSIONS

MLLPJ effectively reduces the PF rate after PD in comparison with TLPJ. Results confirm increased PF rates in patients with pancreatic duct diameter ≤3 mm compared with pancreatic duct diameter >3 mm.

A new pancreaticojejunostomy technique: A battle against postoperative pancreatic fistula

AIM: To present a new technique of end-to-side, duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy with seromuscular jejunal flap formation, and insertion of a silicone stent.

METHODS: We present an end-to-side, duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy with seromuscular jejunal flap formation, and the insertion of a silicone stent. This technique was performed in thirty-two consecutive patients who underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy procedure by the same surgical team, from January 2005 to March 2011. The surgical procedure performed in all cases was classic pancreaticoduodenectomy, without preservation of the pylorus. The diagnosis of pancreatic leakage was defined as a drain output of any measurable volume of fluid on or after postoperative day 3 with an amylase concentration greater than three times the serum amylase activity.

RESULTS: There were 32 patients who underwent end-to-side, duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy with seromuscular jejunal flap formation. Thirteen of them were women and 19 were men. These data correspond to 40.6% and 59.4%, respectively. The mean age was 64.2 years, ranging from 55 to 82 years. The mean operative time was 310.2 ± 40.0 min, and was defined as the time period from the intubation up to the extubation of the patient. Also, the mean time needed to perform the pancreaticojejunostomy was 22.7 min, ranging from 18 to 25 min. Postoperatively, one patient developed a low output pancreatic fistula, three patients developed surgical site infection, and one patient developed pneumonia. The rate of overall morbidity was 15.6%. There was no 30-d postoperative mortality.

CONCLUSION: This modification appears to be a significantly safe approach to the pancreaticojejunostomy without adversely affecting operative time.

Pancreaticodigestive anastomosis and the postoperative management strategies to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula formation after pancreaticoduodenectomy

Over the past 100 years, advances in surgical techniques and perioperative management have reduced the morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Many techniques have been proposed for the reconstruction of the pancreaticodigestive anastomosis to prevent the development of a postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), but which is the best approach is still highly debated. We carried out a systematic review to determine and compare the effectiveness of various methods of anastomosis after PD. A meta-analysis and most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed that the mortality, POPF rate and incidence of other postoperative complications were not statistically different between the pancreaticogastrostomy and pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) groups. One RCT showed that a binding PJ significantly decreased the risk of POPF and other postoperative complications compared with conventional PJ. External duct stenting reduced the risk of clinically relevant POPF in a meta-analysis and RCTs. The prophylactic use of octreotide after PD does not result in a reduced incidence of POPF. In conclusion, our findings suggest that the successful management of pancreatic anastomoses may depend more on the meticulous surgical technique, surgical volume, and other management parameters than on the type of technique used. However, some new approaches, such as binding PJ, and the use of external stents should be considered in further RCTs.

Pancreaticojejunostomy sleeve reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy in laparoscopic and open surgery

This report suggests that sleeve-joint pancreaticojejunostomy reduces the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula.

Introduction:

Laparoscopic procedures for pancreatic surgery have been significantly improved recently; however, only a limited number of successful laparoscopic or laparoscopy-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) have been reported. The limitations could be attributed to the complexity of the reconstruction procedures under laparoscopic observation and the high incidence of complications. Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) has been regarded traditionally as the most frequent major complication and is a potentially serious and life-threatening event. It remains the single most important cause of morbidity after PD and contributes significantly to prolonged mortality. Several modified methods of pancreas anastomosis were introduced to prevent POPF. However, few methods with a satisfactory leakage rate have yet to be seen. Collating principle of theoretical mechanics, we introduce a new method of reconstruction by performing an asymmetric sleeving-joint pancreaticojejunostomy (SJPJ). The aim of this study is to summarize the results of a new technique that is designed to decrease the POPF.

Methods:

From January 2004 to December 2010, SJPJ was performed on 86 patients undergoing PD by 1 surgeon: a laparoscopic reconstruction was completed in 9 cases, a hand-assisted laparoscopic reconstruction in 2 cases, and an open SJPJ reconstruction in 75 cases.

Discussion:

We used SJPJ, an asymmetric pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ). The time of operation ranged from 300 minutes to 640 minutes. Postoperatively there were no major morbidities and no deaths. Although POPF was observed in the laparoscopic SJPJ group with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 3 patients developed POPF in the open SJPJ group with ampullary adenocarcinoma (n=1) and pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n=2). The POPF rate was 9.30% in the open SJPJ group and 9.10% in the laparoscopic SJPJ group. The SJPJ procedure facilitates PJ, both laparoscopically and in open surgery. It is safe, effective, and feasible in experience hands.

Complications after pancreatic resection: diagnosis, prevention and management

BACKGROUND

Although mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) or distal pancreatectomy (DP) has decreased, morbidity still remains high. The aim of this review article is to present, define, predict, prevent, and manage the main complications after pancreatic resection (PR).

METHODS

A non-systematic literature search on morbidity and mortality after PR was undertaken using the PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase databases.

RESULTS

The main complications after PR are delayed gastric emptying (DGE), pancreatic fistula (PF), and bleeding, as defined by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery. PF occurs in 10% to 15% of patients after PD and in 10% to 30% of patients after DP. The different techniques of pancreatic anastomosis and pancreatic remnant closure do not show significant advantages in the prevention of PF, nor does the perioperative use of somatostatin and its analogues. The trend is for conservative or interventional radiology therapy for PF (with enteral nutrition), which achieves a success rate of approximately 80%. DGE after PD occurs in 20% to 50% of patients. Prophylactic erythromycin may reduce the incidence of DGE. Gastric aspiration with erythromycin is usually effective in one to three weeks. Bleeding (gastrointestinal and intraabdominal) occurs in 4% to 16% of patients after PD and in 2% to 3% of patients after DP. Endovascular treatment can only be used for a haemodynamically stable patient. In cases of haemodynamic instability or associated septic complications, surgical treatment is necessary. In expert centres, the mortality rates can be less than 1% after DP and less than 3% after PD.

CONCLUSION

There is a need for improved strategies to prevent and treat complications after PR.

Peng's binding pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. An Italian, prospective, dual-institution study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate Peng's binding pancreaticojejunostomy as a safe technique which avoids anastomotic leakage after a pancreaticoduodenectomy.

METHODS

Prospective, observational, dual-institutional study, of patients who underwent a Peng's binding pancreaticojejunostomy was conducted. It was compared with an historical control group of patients who underwent duct to mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy. Overall postoperative mortality, morbidity, postoperative pancreatic fistulas, postpancreatectomy hemorrhage, reoperation, length and costs of hospital stay were collected. Factors related with pancreatic fistula were: sex, age, co-morbidities, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, type of resection, extension of resection, characteristics of the pancreatic remnant, pathological diagnosis and surgeons. Univariate and multivariate analyzes were carried out.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients who underwent binding pancreaticojejunostomy were reported. The control group consisted of 52 patients. The mean length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the control group than in binding group (p = 0.003). Multivariate analyzes showed that soft pancreatic remnant was significantly related to an increasing rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (OR 3.7-CI 1.1-12.8-P = 0.034) while the type of pancreatic anastomosis was not significantly related with the occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula.

CONCLUSIONS

In the European population, the binding pancreaticojejunostomy according to Peng did not preclude or reduce the postoperative pancreatic fistula rate.

[Is Peng's pancreaticojejunal anastomosis more effective than mucosa-mucosa anastomosis in duodenopancreatectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary tumours?]

INTRODUCTION

The pancreatic fistula is the most feared complication after a duodenopancreatectomy, and is the most common independent factor of post-surgical mortality. Peng et al. recently published a pancreaticojejunal anastomosis technique (binding anastomosis) which showed 0% pancreatic fistulas. The objective of this study is to evaluate and validate this new anastomosis technique compared with the conventional pancreaticoduodenectomy with end-to-side duct-to-mucosa anastomosis.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A prospective, non-randomised study was conducted to evaluate and validate this new anastomosis technique compared with the conventional pancreaticojejunal terminolateral duct to mucosa anastomosis. The study included 63 patients who were subjected to a duodenopancreatectomy due to having a pancreatic or periampullary neoplasm. A binding pancreaticojejunostomy according to the technique described by Peng et al. was performed on 30 patients (Group A), and a pancreaticoduodenectomy with end-to-side duct-to-mucosa anastomosis (conventional technique) was performed on 33 patients (Group B).

RESULTS

When the results of the 2 techniques were compared, 2/30 (6%) of patients had a pancreatic fistula with the Peng technique, and 4/33 (12%) with the conventional technique, but this was not statistically significant (P=.674). Nor were there any significant differences between the 2 groups on comparing, morbidity, hospital stay and mortality.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study show that the anastomosis method described by Peng is safe, but is not associated with a lower frequency of pancreatic fistula, general morbidity, or mortality. This leads to the uncertainty of whether it really has any advantages over other techniques.

Sutureless primary repair of colonic perforation with a degradable stent in a porcine model of fecal peritonitis

PURPOSE

Colonic perforation with fecal peritonitis is a life-threatening clinical condition. For these patients, a two-stage operation of fecal diversion and a postponed colostomy closure is generally recommended. Accordingly, a simple and feasible primary repair technique was explored.

METHODS

A sutureless banding method using a biodegradable stent and a porcine model of artificial colonic perforation were introduced. The colonic perforation model was created successfully with an open procedure in 34 pigs. The primary repair with a stent or the conventional hand-sewn control was performed 72 h later. Morbidity and mortality were recorded. Pigs in each group were also sacrificed to evaluate the healing on postoperative days (PODs) 3, 7, 14, and 90. The peripheral white blood cell counts, albumin, anastomotic bursting pressure, hydroxyproline contents, and histology data were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 17 pigs in either group. Four pigs (23.5 %) of the control group died, but no mortality occurred in the stent group. There were no significant differences in white blood cell counts and albumin. Though anastomotic hydroxyproline contents between the two groups were comparable, the collagen per protein ratio on POD 14 in the stent group was higher, as well as the bursting pressure on PODs 3 and 7. Microscopically, the local inflammation of the cut edges in the control group was more severe, and the collagen synthesis started later.

CONCLUSIONS

A sutureless primary repair of a colonic perforation with a degradable stent is a feasible method in a porcine model of fecal peritonitis.

Application of binding pancreatogastrostomy in laparoscopic central pancreatectomy

BACKGROUND

The feasibility of binding pancreaticogastrostomy in laparoscopic central pancreatectomy is not known.

METHODS

In October 2011, a female patient with a pancreatic neck mass received laparoscopic central pancreatectomy with binding pancreaticogastrostomy.

RESULTS

The operation was successful. No complications occurred. The operative time was 210 min. Blood loss was 120 ml. On day 11 after the operation, the patient was discharged. The postoperative pathological result showed a 2 × 2 × 2-cm solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas with intrapancreatic infiltration. The surgical margin was negative.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic central pancreatectomy with binding pancreaticogastrostomy might be feasible, facilitating further study in laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was waived from trial registration because it is a retrospective analysis of medical records.

Preoperative CT scan helps to predict the occurrence of severe pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the influence of body fat distribution, estimated by a preoperative computed tomographic (CT) scan, on pancreatic fistula (PF) risk after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic fatty infiltration is a predictive factor of PF, but accurate preoperative assessment is challenging. We hypothesized that it could be associated with an increased visceral obesity and could be assessed preoperatively.

METHODS

Over 18 months, 103 consecutive patients with PD and pancreaticogastrostomy were studied. Demographic, radiologic, and pathologic data were correlated to PF occurrence. Radiologic data included on a nonenhanced CT acquisition: pancreas, spleen, and liver density measures (Dpancreas, Dspleen, and Dliver [densities of the pancreas, spleen, and liver in hounsfield units], respectively), retro-renal fat thickness, and at the level of the umbilicus, total, visceral, and subcutaneous fat area (TFA [total fat area], VFA [visceral fat area], and SFA [subcutaneous fat area], respectively). Pancreatic fatty infiltration was graded histologically. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of PF-graded B and C according to the International Study Group on the Pancreatic Fistula.

RESULTS

Among the 103 patients, 37% (n = 38) developed a PF (47.4% grade A, 39.5% grade B, and 13.1% grade C). PF risk was correlated with pancreatic fatty infiltration (P = 0.017). In univariate analysis, male gender (P = 0.023), body mass index (BMI) over 25 kg/m (P = 0.02), retro-renal fat thickness over 15 mm (P = 0.006), TFA over the median (>233 cm; P = 0.023), and VFA over the median (>84 cm; P < 0.0001) were significantly associated with an increased risk of symptomatic PF (grade B and C). In multivariate analysis, VFA greater than 84 cm (OR = 8.16, P = 0.002) was the only independent predictive factor of grade B or C PF. Using the same model, a VFA greater than 84 cm was the only independent factor associated with the presence of fatty pancreas on pathologic examination.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative assessment of body fat distribution by a CT scan, as a surrogate for fatty pancreas infiltration, can help to predict the occurrence of clinically significant PF after PD.

Topically applied 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (Dermabond) for prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy

OBJECTIVE

We examined whether 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (Dermabond) topically applied to the pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) anastomotic site after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) reduces the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF).

METHODS

Patients who underwent PD with duct-to-mucosa PJ were evaluated (n = 124). Outcome was compared between patients who received Dermabond (n = 75) after PD and historic patients who did not (n = 49). Risk factors for POPF were identified.

RESULTS

Overall and clinically relevant rates of POPF were significantly lower in patients who received Dermabond than in patients who did not (2.6 % and 1.3 % vs. 22 % and 12 %, respectively; p = 0.001). In univariate analysis, pancreatic duct diameter ≤3 mm, low serum albumin level, and no Dermabond were independent risk factors for POPF; in multivariate analysis, no Dermabond was an independent risk factor for POPF. In patients with pancreatic duct diameter ≤3 mm, the rate of POPF was significantly lower in patients who received Dermabond than in patients who did not (3.5 % versus 36 %, respectively; p = 0.0001). Patients who received Dermabond had significantly shorter hospital stays and lower re-operation and re-admission rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical application of Dermabond to the PJ anastomotic site after PD significantly reduced the rate of POPF, particularly in patients at risk.

A new feasible technique of mesh-reinforced pancreatojejunostomy and pancreatogastrostomy: retrospective analysis of 61 cases

Background

Pancreatic leak was the major concern after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Methods

A total of 61 patients who underwent mesh-reinforced pancreatojejunostomy or pancreatogastrostomy from August 2005 to November 2011 were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

The mean anastomosis time of mesh-reinforced pancreatojejunostomy was 25 minutes ranging from 22 to 35 minutes. In mesh-reinforced pancreatogastrostomy, the mean anastomosis time ranged from 20 to38 minutes with an average of 30 minutes. Blood loss was 200 to 4,000 ml with an average of 710 ml in all patients. There was one case of pancreatic leak of Class A, three cases of pancreatic leak of Class B, one case of pancreatic leak of Class C, one case of choledochojejunostomy leakage, one case of gastrojejunostomy leakage, and three cases of abdominal bleeding.

Conclusion

As a new technique, mesh-reinforced pancreatojejunostomy and pancreatogastrostomy might be a safe and feasible procedure to prevent postoperative pancreatic leak.

Trial registration

This research is waivered from trial registration because it was a retrospective analysis of medical records.

Vascular resection and reconstruction at pancreatico-duodenectomy: technical issues

BACKGROUND

With the improvement of perioperative management over the years, pancreatico-duodenectomy has become a safe operation despite its technical complexity. The presence of concomitant visceral artery occlusion unrelated to the underlying malignancy and concomitant major venous infiltration by tumor poses additional hazards to resection which could compromise the postoperative outcome.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE database search was performed to identify relevant articles using the key words "median arcuate ligament syndrome", "superior mesenteric artery", "replaced right hepatic artery", and "portal vein resection". Additional papers and book chapters were identified by a manual search of the references from the key articles.

RESULTS

Computed tomography with 3-dimensional reconstruction of the vascular anatomy provides most key information on the potential vascular problems encountered during surgery. A trial clamping of the gastroduodenal artery provides a simple intraoperative assessment for the presence of any significant visceral arterial occlusion. Depending on the timing of diagnosis, division of the median arcuate ligament, bypass or endovascular stenting should be considered. Portal and superior mesenteric vein resection had been used with increasing frequency and safety. The steps and methods taken to reconstruct the venous continuity vary with individual surgeons, and the anatomical variations encountered. With segmental loss of the portal vein, opinions differs with regard to the preservation of the splenic vein, and when divided, the necessity of restoring its continuity; source of the autologous vein graft when needed and whether the use of synthetic graft is a safe alternative.

CONCLUSIONS

During a pancreatico-duodenectomy, images of computed tomography must be carefully studied to appreciate the changes and variation of vascular anatomy. Adequate preoperative preparation, acute awareness of the probable arterial and venous anatomical variation and the availability of expertise, especially micro-vascular surgery, for vascular reconstruction would help to make the complex pancreatic resection a safer procedure.

A novel radiopaque biodegradable stent for pancreatobiliary applications--the first human phase I trial in the pancreas

BACKGROUND/AIMS

During the recent years we have developed and experimentally tested a biodegradable stent for pancreatobiliary applications. Such stents may be used in benign strictures or when securing the flow of bile, pancreatic juice or a fluid collection after endoscopic or surgical procedures. The lack of suitable devices has so far prohibited clinical endoscopic or percutaneous tests whereas surgical application has become possible. Recently we described a modified binding (purse string) pancreaticojejunostomy, where a biodegradable stent is introduced to secure the lumen opening when tightening the bowel over the pancreas with a purse string. Although routine use of any stent in pancreaticojejunostomy has been under debate, we used this setting to run for the first phase I human clinical trial with a biodegradable stent in a pancreatobiliary application.

METHODS

After 29 pancreaticoduodenectomies, a braided gamma sterilized radiopaque 96L/4D polylactide stent was introduced into the duct of pancreas remnant, which was then sunk into the Roux-Y jejunal limb. Complications, stent disappearance and late anastomotic patency (MRI) were monitored.

RESULTS

Hospital mortality was zero. One patient developed Grade C fistula (overall fistula rate 3%). She also developed Grade C hemorrhage and Grade C delayed gastric emptying (DGE). One other patient developed Grade B hemorrhage (overall hemorrhage rate 7%) and B DGE. Three other patients developed clinically significant Grade B-C DGE (5/29=17%). In addition, 10 other patients were not on solid food only on post-operative day 8, and were classified as Grade A DGE (34%). Most of these patients were eating normally and could be discharged from hospital by day 10. Nine out of 26 patients (35%) with negative preoperative trypsinogen test, developed post-operative trypsinogen release suggesting pancreatitis. Within 12 months four patients died and one quitted the study. The stents disappeared in median 3 months. MRI interpretation of the anastomosis failed in one patient having ascites. Of the 23 patients, 13 (57%) had the anastomosis well open, three (13%) had some narrowing, while seven (30%) had the anastomosis obstructed.

CONCLUSION

Compared with our previous experiences obtained in pancreaticoduodenectomy, a biodegradable stent is well tolerated in the human pancreatic duct, encouraging further development for future applications and tests in randomized trials.

Reconstruction by Pancreaticogastrostomy versus Pancreaticojejunostomy following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Objectives. The aim of our study was to evaluate and compare the results of pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) and pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Methods. Published data of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the clinically relevant outcomes of PG versus PJ after PD were analyzed. Two reviewers assessed the quality of each trial and collected data independently. The Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 5.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Proportions were combined, and the odds ratio (OR) with its 95% CI was used as the effect size estimate. Results. Four RCTs published in 1995 or later were included in this meta-analysis, in which 276 patients underwent PG and 277 patients underwent PJ followed PD. In the combined results of PG versus PJ, a significant difference in the morbidity of intra-abdominal complications (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.23–0.49; P < 0.00001) was found, but no significant difference could be found for pancreatic fistula (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.42–1.12 , P = 0.13) mortality (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.42–2.83; P = 0.87), recovery with no complications (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.90–1.78; P = 0.18), biliary fistula (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.22–1.35; P = 0.19), or in delayed gastric emptying (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.33–1.01; P = 0.06). Conclusions. Current RCTs suggest that PG is better than PJ for pancreatic reconstruction after PD.

The methods of reconstruction of pancreatic digestive continuity after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic fistula (PF) is an important factor responsible for the considerable morbidity associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). There have been many techniques proposed for the reconstruction of pancreatic digestive continuity to prevent fistula formation but which is best is still highly debated. We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effectiveness of methods of anastomosis after PD.

METHODS

A full literature search was conducted in the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register Databases, Medline, and other resources irrespective of language. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were considered for inclusion. Analyses were carried out using RevMan software.

RESULTS

In all, ten RCTs that included a total of 1,408 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that the PF, postoperative complications, biliary fistula, mortality, reoperation, and length of hospital stay were not statistically different between the pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) and pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) groups. The PF, postoperative complications, mortality, and reoperation were not statistically different between the duct-to-mucosa PJ and PJ groups. Binding PJ significantly decreased the PF and postoperative complications compared with conventional PJ. The PF, postoperative complications, and mortality were not statistically different between ligation of the pancreatic duct without anastomosis versus PJ.

CONCLUSION

No pancreatic reconstruction technique after PD was found to be applicable to all kinds of pancreatic remnants in our systematic review and meta-analysis. Some new approaches such as binding PJ and modified PG will be considered for study in the future.

Endoskopische Papillenresektion: Indikation und Grenzen

<b><i>Hintergrund: </i></b>Adenome der Papilla Vateri sind selten. Prävalenzen von 0,04–0,12% werden beschrieben. Eine maligne Transformation von benignen Adenomen zu Papillenkarzinomen ist möglich und folgt der Adenom-Karzinom-Sequenz. Die meisten Papillenadenome treten sporadisch auf, können jedoch z.B. bei Patienten mit familiärer adenomatöser Polyposis genetisch häufiger vorkommen. <b><i>Methode: </i></b>Es erfolgte eine aktuelle PubMed-Recherche zum Thema endoskopische Papillenresektion. <b><i>Ergebnisse/Schlussfolgerung: </i></b>Eine endoskopische Papillektomie kann bei Adenomen ohne duktale Infiltration durchgeführt werden, während es in Hinblick auf das papilläre Adenokarzinom noch keinen Konsens gibt. Jedoch konnten neuere Studien zeigen, dass Patienten mit hochgradiger intraepithelialer Neoplasie der Papilla Vateri keine lymphovaskuläre Invasion oder Lymphknotenmetastasen aufweisen, sodass eine endoskopische Papillektomie gerechtfertigt erscheint. Da papilläre Adenome in bis zu 30% der Fälle das Risiko für fokale karzinomatöse Areale beherbergen können, sollte jede Papillektomie «en bloc» durchgeführt werden.

Endoscopic ampullectomy: techniques and outcomes

Advances in endoscopic ampullectomy continue to mitigate concerns regarding incomplete removal of ampullary neoplasias, postprocedure complications, and insufficient treatment of tumors with undetected malignant foci or intraductal invasion. Advanced T staging of these lesions with endoscopic ultrasound and intraductal ultrasound, while useful tools for selection of candidates for snare polypectomy, should be limited to lesions either greater than 3 cm, bearing the macroscopic appearance of malignancy or unamenable to endoscopic therapy. Intraductal ultrasound has demonstrated T-staging accuracy superior to endoscopic ultrasound. One prospective study of prophylactic pancreatic stent placement and a number of retrospective studies have reported reduced complication rates. Recent studies continue to propose follow-up endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography at 3-month intervals after ampullectomy to evaluate for recurrence and ablate residual tissue, with the interval increased to 6 to 12 months for 5 years on obtaining negative biopsies for adenomatous tissue. The development of thermal ablation, notably argon plasma coagulation, for fulguration of residual unresectable tumor, biductal sphincterotomy and prophylactic pancreatic pancreatic stent placement, and advanced diagnostic imaging mitigate the concerns leveled against endoscopic ampullectomy. In experienced hands, endoscopic papillectomy of noninvasive, benign ampullary lesions is a safe, technically feasible, and effective alternative to surgical resection. This study will focus on diagnosis and staging of ampullary adenomas and reviews indications for, and outcomes and complications of, endoscopic papillectomy.

Combined invagination and duct-to-mucosa techniques with modifications: a new method of pancreaticojejunal anastomosis

BACKGROUND

Soft pancreatic texture and a small main pancreatic duct are thought to be the most significant risk factors for the occurrence of pancreatic fistula (PF), a common and serious complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This is in part due to the technical difficulties of pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) posed by a soft gland with a normal-sized duct. To deal with this problem, we developed a new anastomotic technique which combines the two most widely used techniques, namely, the invagination technique and the duct-to-mucosa technique, with a modification of the suture route and insertion of a temporary stent tube.

METHODS

Between January 2003 and December 2009, ninety-two consecutive patients underwent PD in which the new PJ technique was used. Charts and follow-up data of these patients were reviewed for operative details, early postoperative events, and outcomes at 6 months after the operation. PF was defined by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) guidelines and graded (A, B or C) according to the clinical procedures and outcome.

RESULTS

In this group of 92 patients, there was only 1 early death from acute renal failure. PF was observed in 11 patients (12.0%), 8 in grade A, 1 in grade B, and 2 in grade C. For the 2 patients in grade C, PF was surgically managed. There were no early or late deaths attributable to PF. Six months after the operation, all of the patients were free of PJ-related symptoms except for 2, who were found to have steatorrhea.

CONCLUSIONS

Our modified technique is simple and safe in PD. Present data suggest that this technique produces excellent early and medium-term results.

Binding pancreaticoenteric anastomosis: from binding pancreaticojejunostomy to binding pancreaticogastrostomy

Potential mechanisms of occurrence of pancreatic leakage mainly include leakage from the needle hole and from the seam at the adjacent stitch, anastomotic blood supply, tension at the anastomosis, poor anastomotic healing, etc. Binding pancreaticojejunostomy (BPJ) is a safe and effective technique that avoids the primary complication of pancreatic anastomosis leakage. There are two problems with BPJ: a high discrepancy in the size of pancreas stump and the jejunal lumen; sutures on to the pancreas for fixation might cause exudation of pancreatic juice into the abdominal cavity. In order to avoid these two problems, binding pancreaticogastrostomy (BPG) is designed and successfully performed clinically with encouraging results. BPG is good for accommodating a large pancreas stump, and the binding technique is very helpful in minimizing the leak rate of pancreaticogastrostomy.

Article Commentary: Risk Factors of Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Collective Review

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the most frequent complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy, results in increased morbidity and mortality, and adversely affects length of stay and costs. Reported rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula vary from 0 per cent up to more than 30 per cent. Plenty of randomized trails and meta-analysis were published to analyze the ideal procedure, technique of anastomosis, and perioperative management of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy; however, results are often discordant and clear evidence on the ideal management and surgical technique to reduce POPF rate is not yet provided. This collective review examined the current evidence about risk factors contributing to postoperative pancreatic fistula and delineates methods of diagnosis and treatment of this universally dreaded complication.

Does the type of pancreaticojejunostomy after Whipple alter the leak rate?

Despite the overwhelming limitations that plague the literature surrounding the optimal method of reestablishing pancreatico-enteric continuity following a Whipple operation, it is clear that all successful techniques conform to sound surgical principles. These principles include a water-tight and tension-free anastomosis, preservation of adequate blood supply for both organs involved in the anastomosis, and minimal trauma to the pancreas gland. Although surgeon experience, gland texture, and pancreatic duct size are clearly the dominate risk factors from a long list of variables associated with pancreatic leaks following pancreatoduodenectomy, these are nonmodifiable covariates. Although the plethora of current literature cannot provide a single definitive technical solution for restoring pancreatico-enteric continuity, a small number of well-designed RCTs support the use of transanastomotic external stenting for high-risk pancreatic glands and an end-to-side invaginated pancreaticojejunostomy. The truth remains that an individual surgeon's mastery of a specific anastomotic technique, in conjunction with a large personal experience, is likely to be the best predictor of a low pancreas leak rate following pancreatoduodenectomy.

Binding versus conventional pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case-matched study

BACKGROUND

Postoperative morbidity of pancreaticoduodenectomy remains high and is mainly related to postoperative pancreatic fistula. Peng et al. (J Gastrointest Surg 2003;7:898-900; Am J Surg 2002;183:283-285; Ann Surg 2007;245:692-298) recently described binding pancreaticojejunostomy and reported a zero percent rate of pancreatic fistula. The aim of this study was to compare postoperative outcome of binding pancreaticojejunostomy and conventional pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

METHODS

Between June 2006 and June 2008, a case-control study was conducted, including all patients with binding pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. These patients were matched with similar patients with conventional pancreaticojejunostomy. Matching criteria were as follows: age, body mass index, pancreatic texture, and pancreatic main duct size. Postoperative mortality and morbidity were analyzed. Postoperative pancreatic fistula was defined according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients with binding pancreaticojejunostomy and 25 with conventional pancreaticojejunostomy were included. There was no difference concerning the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula, but median delay for healing of postoperative pancreatic fistula was longer in the binding pancreaticojejunostomy group (29 vs. 9 days, p = 0.003). Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage was more frequent in the binding pancreaticojejunostomy group (6/22 vs. 0/25, p = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

Results of this study showed that binding pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy was not associated with lower postoperative pancreatic fistula and moreover seems to increase postpancreatectomy hemorrhage.

Analysis of procedure-related complications after pancreatodoudenectomy

PURPOSE

To analyze the procedure-related complications after pancreaticoduodenctomy (PD) and their risk factors.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-six patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for diseases at region of pancreatic head were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The overall surgical morbidity was 40.5% (51/126). Ten (7.9%) of 51 patients were identified as having pancreatic leakage, others included delayed gastric emptying (8.7%, 11), abdominal infection and abscess (7.9%, 10), abdominal bleeding (5.6%, 7), wound infection (4.8%, 6), wound dehiscence (2.4%, 3), biliary fistula (1.6%, 2) and operative death (1.6%, 2). Other postoperative complications were lung inflammation (3.9%, 5) and newly developed diabetes mellitus (2.3%, 3). Age (>60 years), coexisting diabetes mellitus, small main pancreatic duct (≤0.5 cm), and surgeon's experience (<10 patients within 5 years) were demonstrated to be independent risk factors by both univariate and multivariate analysis (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Old patients with coexisting diabetes mellitus and small main pancreatic duct undergo pancreatoduodenectomy by a less experienced surgeon may be at high risk of procedure-related complications.

Fatty pancreas and increased body mass index are risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic fistula (PF) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) remains a challenging problem. The only commonly accepted risk factor is the soft consistency of the pancreatic remnant.

METHODS

In all, 100 consecutive patients underwent PD. All data, including commonly accepted risk factors for PF and PF defined according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula, were collected prospectively. On the pancreatic margin, a score of fibrosis and a score of fatty infiltration were assessed by a pathologist blinded to the postoperative course.

RESULTS

PF occurred in 31% of patients. In univariate analysis, male sex, age greater than 58 years, body mass index (BMI) > or =25 kg/m(2), pre-operative high blood pressure, operation for nonintraductal papillary and mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) disease and for ampullary carcinoma, operative time, blood loss, soft consistency of the pancreatic remnant, absence of pancreatic fibrosis, and presence of fatty infiltration of the pancreas were associated with a greater risk of PF. In a multivariate analysis, only BMI > or =25 kg/m(2), absence of pancreatic fibrosis, and presence of fatty pancreas were significant predictors of PF. A score based on the number of risk factors present divided the patient population into 4 subgroups carrying a risk of PF that ranged from 7% (no risk factor) to 78% (3 risk factors) and from 0% to 81%, taking into account only symptomatic PF (grade B and C).

CONCLUSION

The presence of an increased BMI, the presence of fatty pancreas, and the absence of pancreatic fibrosis as risk factors of PF allows a more precise and objective prediction of PF than the consistency of pancreatic remnant alone. A predictive score based on these 3 factors could help to tailor preventive measures.

Peng's binding pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a French prospective study

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic fistula (PF) is the single most important complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Recently, a 0% rate of PF was reported using a binding pancreaticojejunostomy with intussusception of the pancreatic stump. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of this new binding pancreaticojejunostomy in condition most susceptible to PF, i.e. soft pancreas and non-dilated main pancreatic duct.

METHODS

Forty-five consecutive patients with soft pancreas and non-dilated main pancreatic duct underwent a binding pancreaticojejunostomy. Post-operative PF was defined according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula.

RESULTS

Four patients (8.9%) developed a PF. In one case, PF developed on post-operative day 3 due to a technical deficiency. In the three other cases, pancreatic fistula developed after the tenth post-operative day; all the patients had local and/or general co-morbidities before PF occurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Binding pancreaticojejunostomy according to Peng is a safe and secure technique that improves the rate of pancreatic fistula, especially in case of soft texture of the pancreas remnant. However, a 0% rate seems to be hard to achieve because other abdominal and general complications are frequent and can lead to secondary leakage of the pancreatic anastomosis.

The pancreatic stump after pancreatoduodenectomy: the "Achille's heel" revisited

Pancreatic fistula, the most dreaded complication of pancreatoduodenectomy occurs with an incidence ranging from 4-30% in literature reports; the incidence varies considerably according to the definition of fistula used. This literature review describes various methods proposed over the last decade to decrease the incidence and severity of pancreatic fistula including techniques of pancreatico-jejunal and pancreatico-gastric anastomoses, deliberate avoidance of pancreatico-enteric anastomosis, and the prophylactic role of somatostatin analogues.

The evolution of the surgical treatment of chronic pancreatitis

OBJECTIVE

To establish the current status of surgical therapy for chronic pancreatitis, recent published reports are examined in the context of the historical advances in the field.

BACKGROUND

The basis for decompression (drainage), denervation, and resection strategies for the treatment of pain caused by chronic pancreatitis is reviewed. These divergent approaches have finally coalesced as the head of the pancreas has become apparent as the nidus of chronic inflammation.

METHODS

The recent developments in surgical methods to treat the complications of chronic pancreatitis and the results of recent prospective randomized trials of operative approaches were reviewed to establish the current best practices.

RESULTS

Local resection of the pancreatic head, with or without duct drainage, and duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection offer outcomes as effective as pancreaticoduodenectomy, with lowered morbidity and mortality. Local resection or excavation of the pancreatic head offers the advantage of lowest cost and morbidity and early prevention of postoperative diabetes. The late incidences of recurrent pain, diabetes, and exocrine insufficiency are equivalent for all 3 surgical approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

Local resection of the pancreatic head appears to offer best outcomes and lowest risk for the management of the pain of chronic pancreatitis.