ACL reconstruction: a meta-analysis of functional scores

Functional recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, a study of health-related quality of life based on the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register

PURPOSE

To restore functional stability of the knee joint and to prevent secondary injuries to the cartilage and menisci are the main goals of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Functional stability can be assessed by health-related quality of life questionnaires, but characterising differences between a satisfactory and non-satisfactory result can be challenging.

METHODS

The aim of this study based on the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register was to find predictors for a satisfactory result defined as functional recovery (FR) or a non-satisfactory result defined as treatment failure (TF), with special emphasis on waiting time before surgery and additional injuries. FR was defined as a Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) above: 90 for Pain, 84 for Symptoms, 91 for ADL, 80 for Sport/Rec and 81 for quality of life (QoL). TF was defined as a KOOS, QoL < 44.

RESULTS

A complete KOOS was available for 41.4 % of a cohort of 8,584 patients 2 years after the ACL reconstruction. Of all patients, 19.7 % were FR and 28.9 % were TF. Male gender was a predictor for FR. Previous surgery of the menisci and a patella graft was predictors for TF and negative predictors for FR. A medial meniscus suture or resection at the time of reconstruction was a predictor for TF. Waiting time was a predictor for medial meniscus and cartilage injury at the time of reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

Functional recovery after an ACL reconstruction can be achieved; gender and additional injuries are important predictors for a functional recovery. To time surgery early, that is, before recurring giving ways has occurred is essential to decrease additional injuries and increase the chance of functional recovery.

Effects of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on in vivo, dynamic knee function

The purposes of this article are to discuss key factors for assessing joint function, to present some recent findings, and to address the future directions for evaluating the function of the anterior cruciate ligament-injured/reconstructed knees. Well-designed studies, using state-of-the art tools to assess knee kinematics under in vivo, dynamic, high-loading conditions, are necessary to evaluate the relative performance of different procedures for restoring normal joint motion.

Do pre-operative knee laxity values influence post-operative ones after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

The objective of this study was to verify whether pre-reconstruction laxity condition effects post-reconstruction outcome. A total of 100 patients who underwent navigated Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction were included in the study and knee laxity analysed retrospectively. The knee was assessed in six different laxity tests before and after ACL reconstruction, namely antero-posterior (AP) and internal-external (IE) at 30° and 90°, and varus-valgus (VV) rotations at 0° and 30° of flexion. For each test, the least square (LS) fitting line based on pre-operative-to-post-operative laxity value was calculated. To what degree the post-operative laxity value is explainable by the corresponding pre-operative condition was evaluated by the LS line slope. Post-operatively, for each single patient, the grade of laxity decreased at any evaluated test. The strongest influence of pre-operative-to-post-operative laxity values was found during IE30 and IE90 tests. While AP30 and VV0 tests seem to be those in which the post-reconstruction laxity was barely affected by the pre-surgery condition. The analysis of the global laxity reduction confirms the previous results. Following this hypothesis, our study remarks on the importance of combined lesions to secondary restraints and the importance of fully understanding the residual laxity to optimize the surgical technique.

Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Rates of return to pre-injury sport following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are less than might be expected from standard outcome measures and there appears to be a rapid decline in sporting participation after two to three years. There are many factors that influence whether an individual will return to sport following this type of surgery. They include not only surgical details and rehabilitation, but also social and psychological factors, as well as demographic characteristics. Age is of particular importance with older patients being less likely to resume their pre-injury sport. It is important that future research clearly identify the pre-injury characteristics of the study cohort when investigating return to sport, and also that there is consistent and precise terminology used to report rates of return to sporting activities. Little is known about how to determine when it is safe to return to sport following ACL reconstruction or how to predict whether an athlete will be able to successfully return to sport. Finally, it needs to be recognised that return to sport following ACL reconstruction is associated with a risk of further injury and the development of osteoarthritis.

Biomechanical comparison of different graft positions for single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

Recent reports have highlighted the importance of an anatomic tunnel placement for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of different tunnel positions for single-bundle ACL reconstruction on knee biomechanics.

METHODS

Sixteen fresh-frozen cadaver knees were used. In one group (n = 8), the following techniques were used for knee surgery: (1) anteromedial (AM) bundle reconstruction (AM-AM), (2) posterolateral (PL) bundle reconstruction (PL-PL) and (3) conventional vertical single-bundle reconstruction (PL-high AM). In the other group (n = 8), anatomic mid-position single-bundle reconstruction (MID-MID) was performed. A robotic/universal force-moment sensor system was used to test the knees. An anterior load of 89 N was applied for anterior tibial translation (ATT) at 0°, 15°, 30° and 60° of knee flexion. Subsequently, a combined rotatory load (5 Nm internal rotation and 7 Nm valgus moment) was applied at 0°, 15°, 30° and 45° of knee flexion. The ATT and in situ forces during the application of the external loads were measured.

RESULTS

Compared with the intact ACL, all reconstructed knees had a higher ATT under anterior load at all flexion angles and a lower in situ force during the anterior load at 60° of knee flexion. In the case of combined rotatory loading, the highest ATT was achieved with PL-high AM; the in situ force was most closely restored with MIDMID, and the in situ force was the highest AM-AM at each knee flexion angle.

CONCLUSION

Among the techniques, AM-AM afforded the highest in situ force and the least ATT.

The assessment of postural control and the influence of a secondary task in people with anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees using a Nintendo Wii Balance Board

BACKGROUND

Postural control impairments may persist following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The effect of a secondary task on postural control has, however, not been determined. The purpose of this case-control study was to compare postural control in patients following ACL reconstruction with healthy individuals with and without a secondary task.

PARTICIPANTS

45 patients (30 men and 15 women) participated at least 6 months following primary ACL reconstruction surgery. Participants were individually matched by age, gender and sports activity to healthy controls.

MATERIALS

Postural control was measured using a Nintendo Wii Balance Board and customised software during static single-leg stance and with the addition of a secondary task. The secondary task required participants to match the movement of an oscillating marker by adducting and abducting their arm.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Centre of pressure (CoP) path length in both medial-lateral and anterior-posterior directions, and CoP total path length.

RESULTS

When compared with the control group, the anterior-posterior path length significantly increased in the ACL reconstruction patients' operated (12.3%, p=0.02) and non-operated limbs (12.8%, p=0.02) for the single-task condition, and the non-operated limb (11.5%, p=0.006) for the secondary task condition. The addition of a secondary task significantly increased CoP path lengths in all measures (p<0.001), although the magnitude of the increase was similar in both the ACL reconstruction and control groups.

DISCUSSION

ACL reconstruction patients showed a reduced ability in both limbs to control the movement of the body in the anterior-posterior direction. The secondary task affected postural control by comparable amounts in patients after ACL reconstruction and healthy controls. Devices for the objective measurement of postural control, such as the one used in this study, may help clinicians to more accurately identify patients with deficits who may benefit from targeted neuromuscular training programs.

Arthroscopic combined medial and lateral meniscus transplantation after double-tunnel, double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the same knee

Meniscus transplantation in combination with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been used in the treatment of patients with meniscus and ACL deficiency. However, there have been no reports of arthroscopic surgery and the outcome of both medial and lateral meniscus allograft transplantation after double-tunnel, double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Herein, we report the case of a young male who received arthroscopic lateral and medial meniscectomy and ACL tibialis allograft reconstruction performed with the double-tunnel and double-bundle technique approximately 8 months after a knee injury. Approximately 4 months postoperatively he began to experience pain and weakness in the operated knee and subsequently underwent arthroscopic lateral and medial meniscus allograft transplantation in the same procedure. Second-look arthroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging revealed the meniscal allografts to have normal shape and the ACL grafts to be relatively intact at 18 and 30 months after surgery. His knee appeared stable and the range of motion was normal. Our hypothesis was that knee stability could reliably be restored with this combined procedure and the meniscal grafts and ACL graft could provide protection for each other. We suggest that medial and lateral meniscus allografts for one patient should be from the same donor. In the operation, attention must be paid to the direction of the bone tunnels used to fix the horns of the meniscal grafts to avoid communication with other tunnels in the tibial plateau.

Anatomical versus non-anatomical single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study of comparison of knee stability

Background

The purpose of this study was to compare the initial stability of anatomical and non-anatomical single bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and to determine which would better restore intact knee kinematics. Our hypothesis was that the initial stability of anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction would be superior to that of non-anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction.

Methods

Anterior tibial translation (ATT) and internal rotation of the tibia were measured with a computer navigation system in seven pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric knees under two testing conditions (manual maximum anterior force, and a manual maximum anterior force combined with an internal rotational force). Tests were performed at 0, 30, 60, and 90 degrees of flexion with the ACL intact, the ACL transected, and after reconstruction of one side of a pair with either anatomical or non-anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction.

Results

Under manual maximal anterior force, both reconstruction techniques showed no significant difference of ATT when compared to ACL intact knee state at 30° of knee flexion (p > 0.05). Under the combined anterior and internal rotatory force, non-anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction showed significant difference of ATT compared to those in ACL intact group (p < 0.05). In contrast, central anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction showed no significant difference of ATT compared to those in ACL intact group (p > 0.05). Internal rotation of the tibia showed no significant difference in the ACL intact, the ACL transected, non-anatomical reconstructed and anatomical reconstructed knees.

Conclusions

Anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction restored the initial stability closer to the native ACL under combined anterior and internal rotational forces when compared to non-anatomical ACL single bundle reconstruction.

Single-legged hop tests as predictors of self-reported knee function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study

BACKGROUND

Single-legged hop tests are commonly used functional performance measures that can capture limb asymmetries in patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Hop tests hold potential as predictive factors of self-reported knee function in individuals after ACL reconstruction.

HYPOTHESIS

Single-legged hop tests conducted preoperatively would not and 6 months after ACL reconstruction would predict self-reported knee function (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] 2000) 1 year after ACL reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

One hundred twenty patients who were treated with ACL reconstruction performed 4 single-legged hop tests preoperatively and 6 months after ACL reconstruction. Self-reported knee function within normal ranges was defined as IKDC 2000 scores greater than or equal to the age- and sex-specific normative 15th percentile score 1 year after surgery. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of self-reported knee function within normal ranges. The area under the curve (AUC) from receiver operating characteristic curves was used as a measure of discriminative accuracy.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients completed single-legged hop tests 6 months after surgery and the 1-year follow-up with 68 patients classified as having self-reported knee function within normal ranges 1 year after reconstruction. The crossover hop and 6-m timed hop limb symmetry index (LSI) 6 months after ACL reconstruction were the strongest individual predictors of self-reported knee function (odds ratio, 1.09 and 1.10) and the only 2 tests in which the confidence intervals of the discriminatory accuracy (AUC) were above 0.5 (AUC = 0.68). Patients with knee function below normal ranges were over 5 times more likely of having a 6-m timed hop LSI lower than the 88% cutoff than those with knee function within normal ranges. Patients with knee function within normal ranges were 4 times more likely to have a crossover hop LSI greater than the 95% cutoff than those with knee function below normal ranges. No preoperative single-legged hop test predicted self-reported knee function within normal ranges 1 year after ACL reconstruction (all P > .353).

CONCLUSION

Single-legged hop tests conducted 6 months after ACL reconstruction can predict the likelihood of successful and unsuccessful outcome 1 year after ACL reconstruction. Patients demonstrating less than the 88% cutoff score on the 6-m timed hop test at 6 months may benefit from targeted training to improve limb symmetry in an attempt to normalize function. Patients with minimal side-to-side differences on the crossover hop test at 6 months possibly will have good knee function at 1 year if they continue with their current training regimen. Preoperative single-legged hop tests are not able to predict postoperative outcomes.

A systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials comparing hamstring autografts versus bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament

OBJECTIVES

Controversies exist over which type of graft is best for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of ACL reconstruction using either hamstring (HT) autografts or bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts.

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE for published randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing HT autografts with BPTB autografts for ACL reconstruction. Data analyses were performed using Cochrane Collaboration RevMan 5.0.

RESULTS

Nine RCTs (738 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The combined results of the meta-analysis indicated there was a significantly lower rate of negative Pivot test [relative risk (RR) 0.87, 95 % confidence intervals (CI) 0.79-0.96, P = 0.004], anterior knee pain (RR 0.66, 95 % CI 0.45-0.96, P = 0.03) and of kneeling pain (RR 0.49, 95 % CI 0.27-0.91, P = 0.02) in the HT group than in the BPTB group.

CONCLUSIONS

ACL reconstruction with HT autografts or BPTB autografts achieved similar postoperative effects in terms of restoring knee joint function. HT autografts were inferior to BPTB autografts for restoring knee joint stability, but were associated with fewer postoperative complications.

Anterior cruciate ligament graft choices: a review of current concepts

The graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction continues to be controversial. There are several options available for the treating surgeon, including Bone Patellar Tendon Bone (BPTB) grafts, Hamstring tendon (HT) grafts, allografts and synthetic grafts. Within the last decade there have been several comparative trials and meta-analysis, which have failed to provide an answer with regards to the best graft available. The aim of this review is to understand the current concepts in graft choices for ACL reconstruction.

Anterior cruciate ligament rupture and osteoarthritis progression

Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) rupture is a common sporting injury that frequently affects young, athletic patients. Apart from the functional problems of instability, patients with ACL deficient knees also develop osteoarthritis. Although this is frequently cited as an indication for ACL reconstruction, the relationship between ACL rupture, reconstruction and the instigation and progression of articular cartilage degenerative change is controversial.The purpose of this paper is to review the published literature with regards ACL rupture and the multifactorial causes for osteoarthritis progression, and whether or not this is slowed or stopped by ACL reconstruction.There is no evidence in the published literature to support the view that ACL reconstruction prevents osteoarthritis, although it may prevent further meniscal damage. It must be recognised that this conclusion is based on the current literature which has substantial methodological limitations.

Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft: technique and 2- to 5-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Nonanatomic transtibial single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (SB-ACLR) with a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) allograft has been used for a long time and has shown the same satisfactory clinical results as an autograft; however, it has not been reported if a double-bundle ACLR (DB-ACLR) could be performed with a BPTB allograft and achieve even better results.

HYPOTHESIS

The DB-ACLR with a BPTB allograft is technically feasible and will be superior to the SB technique in restoring better anterior and rotating stability.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

The study was performed with 56 patients, and 52 (25 in the DB group and 27 in the SB group) of them were followed up at 2 to 5 years. With an irradiated deep-frozen BPTB allograft, a standard single-incision arthroscopic technique was used, and the graft was fixed with bioabsorbable interference screws on both the femoral and tibial sides. Outcome assessment at final follow-up included International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Tegner, and Lysholm scores; side-to-side difference by conventional KT-2000 arthrometer; total anteroposterior (AP) laxity by the back-pushing KT-2000 arthrometer; pivot shift (0, +, ++); range of motion (ROM); and isokinetic muscle strength evaluation.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 47.3 ± 11.5 and 58.2 ± 6.6 months for the DB group and SB group, respectively. A statistically significant difference in favor of the DB group was found with the total AP laxity at 30° (P < .05). The overall incidence of pivot shift in the DB group (4% ++) was significantly lower than that in the SB group (26%: 19% + and 7% ++; P = .029). No significant differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of IKDC score, Lysholm score, Tegner score, conventional KT-2000 arthrometer anterior laxity, ROM, and muscle strength.

CONCLUSION

A DB-ACLR with a BPTB allograft is feasible and achieved more satisfactory results than the transtibial SB technique in terms of total AP stability and rotational stability in spite of no significant differences among other clinical parameters.

Navigated knee kinematics after cutting of the ACL and its secondary restraint

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the kinematics changes of the knee after cutting of the ACL with or without injury of the anterolateral structures.

METHODS

In this study, the role of the ACL and one of the secondary restraints in controlling knee stability using a navigation system was evaluated. The kinematics of the knee was evaluated in different conditions of instability: ACL intact, after dissection of the posterolateral (PL) bundle, after dissection of the anteromedial (AM) bundle, and after lesion of the lateral capsular ligament (LCL). Anterior tibial translation and rotation were measured with a computer navigation system in 10 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees by use of a manual maximum load. Anterior translation was evaluated at 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion; rotation at 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90°.

RESULTS

Cutting the PL bundle does not increase anterior translation and rotation of the knee. Cutting the AM bundle significantly increased the anteroposterior (AP) translation at 30° and 60° (P = 0.01), but does not increase rotation of the knee. Cutting the LCL increased anterior translation at 60° (P = 0.04) and rotation at 30°, 45°, and 60° (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Within the testing conditions of this study, the PL bundle does not affect anterior translation and rotation of the knee; the AM bundle is the primary restraint of the anterior translation but does not affect rotation of the knee while the lesion of the LCL increases tibial rotation and could be related to the pivot shift phenomenon, so it is more correct and biomechanical valid to assess and repair the associated lesion of the antero-lateral structure of the knee at the time of ACL surgery.

Surgical technique: revision ACL reconstruction with a rectangular tunnel technique

BACKGROUND

We developed the rectangular tunnel ACL reconstruction (RT ACLR) using a 10-mm wide bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) graft through rectangular tunnels with a rectangular aperture to reduce tunnel size: the cross-sectional area of the tunnels of 50 mm(2) (5 × 10 mm) in RT ACLR is less than that of 79 mm(2) in a conventional 10-mm round tunnel technique presuming the technique would be more suitable in revision ACLR with previous improperly placed tunnels.

DESCRIPTION OF TECHNIQUE

Two contiguous 5-mm tunnels inside the anatomic ACL femoral and tibial attachment areas along their long axes, and they are expanded with a 5 × 10-mm dilator into parallelepiped ones.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We indicated and intended to perform the RT ACLR procedure in 31 patients requiring revision between 2004 and 2008. Eighteen of the 31 patients treated with the procedure were followed a minimum of 24 months (mean, 38 months; range, 24 to 73 months). We evaluated ROM, obtained IKDC scores, and determined stability with KT-1000.

RESULTS

The procedure could be applied in 30 of the 31 cases. One of the 18 reruptured the graft at 28 months. Of the remaining 17 patients with followup of 24 months or longer, 15 had full ROM, while the remaining two lost 5° of flexion; 11 were classified as normal and six were nearly normal according to the IKDC evaluation. Stability measured with KT-1000 was 1.0 ± 1.5 mm.

CONCLUSION

The RT ACLR technique provided acceptable results after one-stage revision ACLR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction utilizing the double-bundle technique

The goal of every orthopaedic surgeon should be to restore anatomy as close as possible to normal. Intense research on reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and an advancing knowledge of the anatomy and function of the 2 primary bundles of the ACL have led to techniques of ACL reconstruction that more closely restore normal anatomy. Restoring the ACL footprint is one of the most important goals of the surgery, and the choice between anatomic single-bundle and double-bundle ACL reconstruction is determined by the anatomical features of each patient. After reconstruction, the graft undergoes a complex, lengthy process of remodeling; therefore, inappropriate (early), aggressive rehabilitation can lead to graft failure and compromise the patient's outcome. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the anatomy and function of the ACL, the methods for anatomic single-bundle and double-bundle ACL reconstruction, and our recommendations for postoperative rehabilitation.

Clinical results and risk factors for reinjury 15 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of prospective studies comparing the long-term outcome of endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with either a patellar tendon or hamstring tendon autograft.

PURPOSE

This prospective longitudinal study compared the results of isolated endoscopic ACL reconstruction utilizing a 4-strand hamstring tendon (HT) or patellar tendon (PT) autograft over a 15-year period with respect to reinjury, clinical outcomes, and the development of osteoarthritis.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

Ninety consecutive patients with isolated ACL rupture were reconstructed with a PT autograft, and 90 patients received an HT autograft, with an identical surgical technique. Patients were assessed at 2, 5, 7, 10, and 15 years. Assessment included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) knee ligament evaluation including radiographic evaluation, KT-1000 arthrometer testing, and Lysholm knee score.

RESULTS

Patients who received the PT graft had significantly worse outcomes compared with those who received the HT graft at 15 years for the variables of radiologically detectable osteoarthritis (grade A: 46% in PT and 69% in HT; P = .04), motion loss (extension deficit <3°: 79% in PT and 94% in HT; P = .03), single-legged hop test (grade A: 65% in PT and 92% in HT; P = .001), participation in strenuous activity (very strenuous or strenuous: 62% of PT and 77% of HT; P = .04), and kneeling pain (moderate or greater pain: 42% of PT and 26% of HT; P = .04). There was no significant difference between the HT and PT groups in overall IKDC grade (grade A: 47% of PT and 57% of HT; P = .35). An ACL graft rupture occurred in 17% of the HT group and 8% of the PT group (P = .07). An ACL graft rupture was associated with nonideal tunnel position (odds ratio [OR], 5.0) and male sex (OR, 3.2). Contralateral ACL rupture occurred in significantly more PT patients (26%) than HT patients (12%) (P = .02) and was associated with age ≤18 years (OR, 4.1) and the PT graft (OR, 2.6).

CONCLUSION

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using ipsilateral autograft continues to show excellent results in terms of patient satisfaction, symptoms, function, activity level, and stability. The use of HT autograft does, however, show better outcomes than the PT autograft in all of these outcome measures. Additionally, at 15 years, the HT graft-reconstructed ACLs have shown a lower rate of radiological osteoarthritis.

Revision ACL reconstruction in skeletally mature athletes younger than 18 years

BACKGROUND

Young, active, skeletally mature patients have higher failure rates after various surgical procedures, including stabilization for shoulder instability and primary ACL reconstruction. It is unclear whether young, active, skeletally mature patients share similarly high failure rates after revision ACL reconstruction.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We therefore determined whether revision ACL reconstruction restores knee stability and allows young (younger than 18 years), active, skeletally mature patients to return to preinjury activity levels.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified 36 patients who had an initial ACL reconstruction between the ages of 12 and 17 years (mean, 15.4 years) and subsequent revision between the ages of 13 and 18 years (mean, 16.9 years); of these, 2-year followup was available for 21 (75%). Mechanisms of primary graft failure included traumatic rerupture (23 noncontact, seven contact), persistent instability (five), and infection (one). One patient had open physes at the time of revision. All revisions were single-stage transosseous reconstructions. The minimum followup was 24 months (mean, 36 months; range, 24-63 months).

RESULTS

At last followup, 19 of 21 patients had a negative or IA Lachman and 20 of 21 had a negative pivot shift. Mean International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score was 89 (range, 64-99). Eleven of the 21 patients returned to the same or higher activity/sport level as before their original injury. Two patients reported subjective knee instability, with two having repeat revision reconstruction for failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-stage transosseous revision ACL reconstruction in young, active, skeletally mature patients restores knee stability but returns only 52% of patients to their prior level of activity or sport.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Does anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction lead to degenerative disease?: Thirteen-year results after bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft

BACKGROUND

Reporting of long-term outcome of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with the patellar tendon (bone-patellar tendon-bone [BTB]) autograft is limited. There are concerns that degenerative joint disease is common in the long term, which may be associated with the procedure itself.

HYPOTHESES

(1) ACL reconstruction with BTB provides good long-term outcome. (2) There are additional factors to surgical reconstruction that can be associated with the development of degenerative disease.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Of 161 patients, 114 were eligible. Patient-centered outcome was by Lysholm and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score; objective outcome measures were clinical examination and IKDC radiological grade.

RESULTS

Mean average follow-up was 13 years. The IKDC radiological grades in the worst compartment were A = 15%, B = 51%, C = 19%, and D = 14% (n = 83). There was a significant difference between the injured versus contralateral uninjured knee (n = 42, P = .003). In a subgroup with no meniscal or chondral injury the IKDC grades were A = 38%, B = 55%, C = 7%, and D = 0% (n = 29). The mean subjective scores were 89 ± 11 (Lysholm) and 83 ± 15 (IKDC) (n = 114). Poor IKDC subjective outcome was associated with chondral injury (P = .001), previous surgery (P = .022), return to sport (P = .013), and poor radiological grade in the ipsilateral medial compartment (P = .004). A poor IKDC radiological grade was associated with chondral injury (P = .002), meniscal injury (P = .010) and meniscectomy (P = .012), an IKDC subjective score of <85 (P = .01), and poor radiological grade in the contralateral medial compartment (P = .041).

CONCLUSION

At 13 years, BTB ACL reconstruction provides a good outcome. Chondral and meniscal damage at surgery were associated with a poor radiological outcome, indicating that injuries sustained during ACL rupture may be the main predictors of degenerative bone disease.

Pre-operative factors predicting good outcome in terms of health-related quality of life after ACL reconstruction

The life situation of many patients changes after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture and subsequent reconstruction, and this may affect their health-related quality of life in many ways. It is well known that the overall clinical results after ACL reconstruction are considered good, but pre-operative predictive factors for a good post-operative clinical outcome after ACL reconstruction have not been studied in as much detail. The purpose of this study was to identify pre-operative factors that predict a good post-operative outcome as measured by the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) 3-6 years after ACL reconstruction. Seventy-three patients scheduled for ACL reconstruction were clinically examined pre-operatively. The SF-36 and KOOS questionnaires were sent by mail to these patients 3-6 years after reconstruction. Predictive factors for health-related quality of life were investigated using a stepwise regression analysis. In conclusion, pre-operative factors, such as pivot shift, knee function, and range of motion, may predict a good post-operative outcome and explain up to 25% in terms of health-related quality of life after ACL reconstruction. Furthermore, it appears that the patients' pre-injury and pre-operative Tegner activity levels are important predictors of post-operative health-related quality of life.

Transtibial ACL reconstruction technique fails to position drill tunnels anatomically in vivo 3D CT study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to visualize and quantify the positions of femoral and tibial tunnels in patients who underwent traditional transtibial single-bundle ACL reconstruction, as performed by multiple surgeons, utilizing 3D CT models, and to compare these positions to our previously reported anatomical tunnel positions.

METHODS

Fifty-eight knee computed tomography (CT) scans were performed on patients who underwent primary or revision transtibial single-bundle ACL reconstruction, and three-dimensional reconstructions of the CT scans were aligned within an anatomical coordinate system. The position of femoral tunnel aperture centers was measured with (1) the quadrant method and (2) in the anatomic posterior-to-anterior and proximal-to-distal directions. The position of tibia tunnel aperture centers were measured similarly, in the anterior-to-posterior and medial-to-lateral dimensions on the tibial plateau. Comparisons were made to previously established anatomical tunnel positions, and data were presented as "mean value ± standard deviation (range)."

RESULTS

The location of tibial tunnels was at 48.0 ± 5.4% (35.6-59.5%) of the anterior-to-posterior plateau depth and at 47.9 ± 2.9% (42.2-57.4%) of the medial-to-lateral plateau width. The location of femoral tunnels was at 55.8 ± 8.0% (41.5-79.5%) in the anatomic posterior-to-anterior direction and at 41.2 ± 10.4% (15.1-67.4%) in the proximal-to-distal directions. Utilizing a quadrant method, femoral tunnels were positioned at 37.4 ± 5.1% (24.9-50.6%) from the proximal condylar surface, parallel to Blumensaat line, and at 11.0 ± 7.3% (-6.0-28.7%) from the notch roof, perpendicular to Blumensaat line. In summary, tibial tunnels were positioned medial to the anatomic PL position (p < 0.001), and femoral tunnels were positioned anterior to both AM and PL anatomic tunnel locations (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

ACL reconstruction via traditional transtibial technique fails to accurately position femoral and tibial tunnels within the native ACL insertion site. To achieve anatomical graft placement, other surgical techniques should be considered.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Return to preinjury sports participation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: contributions of demographic, knee impairment, and self-report measures

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional cohort.

OBJECTIVES

(1) To examine differences in clinical variables (demographics, knee impairments, and self-report measures) between those who return to preinjury level of sports participation and those who do not at 1 year following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, (2) to determine the factors most strongly associated with return-to-sport status in a multivariate model, and (3) to explore the discriminatory value of clinical variables associated with return to sport at 1 year postsurgery.

BACKGROUND

Demographic, physical impairment, and psychosocial factors individually prohibit return to preinjury levels of sports participation. However, it is unknown which combination of factors contributes to sports participation status.

METHODS

Ninety-four patients (60 men; mean age, 22.4 years) 1 year post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were included. Clinical variables were collected and included demographics, knee impairment measures, and self-report questionnaire responses. Patients were divided into "yes return to sports" or "no return to sports" groups based on their answer to the question, "Have you returned to the same level of sports as before your injury?" Group differences in demographics, knee impairments, and self-report questionnaire responses were analyzed. Discriminant function analysis determined the strongest predictors of group classification. Receiver-operating-characteristic curves determined the discriminatory accuracy of the identified clinical variables.

RESULTS

Fifty-two of 94 patients (55%) reported yes return to sports. Patients reporting return to preinjury levels of sports participation were more likely to have had less knee joint effusion, fewer episodes of knee instability, lower knee pain intensity, higher quadriceps peak torque-body weight ratio, higher score on the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, and lower levels of kinesiophobia. Knee joint effusion, episodes of knee instability, and score on the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form were identified as the factors most strongly associated with self-reported return-to-sport status. The highest positive likelihood ratio for the yes-return-to-sports group classification (14.54) was achieved when patients met all of the following criteria: no knee effusion, no episodes of instability, and International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form score greater than 93.

CONCLUSION

In multivariate analysis, the factors most strongly associated with return-to-sport status included only self-reported knee function, episodes of knee instability, and knee joint effusion.

Predictors of radiographic knee osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Evidence suggests that single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction does not reliably prevent the development of knee osteoarthritis (OA).

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to determine the overall prevalence of and risk factors for the development of radiographic knee OA after single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Case control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

There were 249 individuals who had undergone primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction included in this retrospective cohort study. Follow-up radiographs were scored by a single orthopaedic surgery sports medicine fellow using the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) scale to determine the degree of OA in the medial, lateral, and patellofemoral compartments. Radiographic OA of the involved knee was considered to be present if, compared with the noninvolved knee, there was at least a 2-grade difference in the KL score in at least 1 compartment or a 1-grade difference in at least 2 compartments. Predictors of OA that were explored included patient age, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking status activity level, meniscectomy before or concurrent with ACL reconstruction, chondral injury present at the time of ACL reconstruction, graft type and source, tibial and femoral tunnel positions, need for revision, and length of follow-up. Univariable and stepwise multivariable logistic regressions were used to identify factors that were associated with radiographic knee OA.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine percent of the patients had radiographic OA an average of 7.8 years after surgery. Female sex, BMI, time from injury to surgery, medial and patellofemoral compartment chondrosis, prior medial or lateral meniscectomy, concurrent medial meniscectomy, and length of follow-up were associated with radiographic knee OA after ACL surgery. Stepwise multivariable logistic regression indicated that prior medial meniscectomy (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-6.85), grade 2 or greater medial chondrosis (95% CI, 1.27-6.73), length of follow-up (95% CI, 1.07-1.24), and BMI (overweight 95% CI, 1.08-3.84; obese 95% CI, 1.34-7.80) were the best set of predictors of knee OA.

CONCLUSION

Despite reduced laxity and instability and improved activity and participation, individuals who have undergone ACL reconstruction are still at high risk for developing knee OA compared with the general population. The strongest predictors of knee OA after ACL reconstruction were obesity and grade 2 or greater chondrosis in the medial compartment. These results may aid in identifying patients at risk for OA after ACL reconstruction.

Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) commonly involves patellar tendon (PT) or hamstring tendon(s) (HT) autografts. There is no consensus with respect to the choice between these two grafts in ACL surgery.

OBJECTIVES

This review compared the outcomes of ACL reconstruction using PT versus HT autografts in ACL deficient patients.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (April 2008), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2008, Issue 2), MEDLINE (1966 to April 10 2008), EMBASE (1980 to April 10 2008), conference proceedings and reference lists. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes (minimum two year follow-up) following ACL reconstruction using either PT or HT autografts in skeletally mature adults, irrespective of the number of bundles, fixation method or incision technique.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

After independent study selection, the four authors independently assessed trial quality and risk of bias, and extracted data using pre-developed forms. Trial authors were contacted for additional data and information. Risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for dichotomous outcomes, and mean differences and 95% confidence intervals for continuous outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

Nineteen trials providing outcome data for 1597 young to middle-aged adults were included. Many trials were at high risk of bias reflecting inadequate methods of randomization, lack of blinding and incomplete assessment of outcome.Pooled data for primary outcomes, reported in a minority of trials, showed no statistically significant differences between the two graft choices for functional assessment (single leg hop test), return to activity, Tegner and Lysholm scores, and subjective measures of outcome. There were also no differences found between the two interventions for re-rupture or International Knee Documentation Committee scores. There were inadequate long-term results, such as to assess the development of osteoarthritis.All tests (instrumental, Lachman, pivot shift) for static stability consistently showed that PT reconstruction resulted in a more statically stable knee compared with HT reconstruction. Conversely, patients experienced more anterior knee problems, especially with kneeling, after PT reconstruction. PT reconstructions resulted in a statistically significant loss of extension range of motion and a trend towards loss of knee extension strength. HT reconstructions demonstrated a trend towards loss of flexion range of motion and a statistically significant loss of knee flexion strength. The clinical importance of the above range of motion losses is unclear.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to draw conclusions on differences between the two grafts for long-term functional outcome. While PT reconstructions are more likely to result in statically stable knees, they are also associated with more anterior knee problems.

Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, part 1: Basic science

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is a frequently performed orthopaedic procedure. Although short-term results are generally good, long-term outcomes are less favorable. Thus, there is renewed interest in improving surgical techniques. Recent studies of anterior cruciate ligament anatomy and function have characterized the 2-bundle structure of the native ligament. During non-weightbearing conditions, the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles display reciprocal tension patterns. However, during weightbearing, both the AM and PL bundles are maximally elongated at low flexion angles and shorten significantly with increasing knee flexion. Conventional single-bundle reconstruction techniques often result in nonanatomic tunnel placement, with a tibial PL to a femoral "high AM" tunnel position. In vitro studies have demonstrated that these nonanatomic single-bundle reconstructions cannot completely restore normal anterior-posterior or rotatory laxity. Cadaveric studies suggest that anatomic single-bundle and anatomic double-bundle reconstruction may better restore knee stability. Although many cadaver studies suggest that double-bundle reconstruction techniques result in superior stability when compared with single-bundle techniques, others failed to demonstrate a clear benefit of this more complex procedure. Cadaver studies generally do not apply physiologically relevant loads and provide only a "time-zero" assessment that ignores effects of healing and remodeling after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. In vivo, dynamic studies offer the most comprehensive assessment of knee function after injury or reconstruction, as they can evaluate dynamic stability during functional joint loading. Studies of knee kinematics during activities such as gait and running suggest that nonanatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction fails to restore preinjury knee function under functional loading conditions. Similar studies of more anatomic single- and double-bundle surgical approaches are in progress, and preliminary results suggest that these anatomic techniques may be more effective for restoring preinjury knee function. However, more extensive, well-designed studies of both kinematics and long-term outcomes are warranted to characterize the potential benefits of more anatomic reconstruction techniques for improving long-term outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

In vitro and intraoperative laxities after single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to objectively evaluate whether double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction can better restore the normal translational and rotational laxities than the conventional single-bundle ACL reconstruction among the reported biomechanical studies.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted to identify in vitro and in vivo (intraoperative) biomechanical studies that compared the laxities (anterior or anteroposterior or rotational) between single- and double-bundle ACL reconstructions. Because of large variability among the loading conditions and testing methods used to determine the rotational laxities among the studies, a meta-analysis of rotational laxities was not feasible.

RESULTS

Seven in vitro and three in vivo studies were included in this analysis based on the predefined inclusion criteria. The overall mean differences calculated by the random effects model in anteroposterior laxity between the single-bundle and double-bundle ACL reconstruction techniques at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion were 0.99 mm, 0.38 mm, 0.34 mm, and 0.07 mm, respectively. No statistically significant difference was noted between the 2 treatments at all flexion angles. Among the 9 studies that compared the rotational laxity of single-bundle and double-bundle ACL reconstructions, 4 reported that double-bundle reconstruction can provide better rotational control than single-bundle reconstruction. The other 5 studies could not identify any significant difference between the 2 reconstructions in terms of rotational laxity.

CONCLUSIONS

Both single- and double-bundle treatment options for ACL injury result in similar anteroposterior knee joint laxity at time 0. No conclusive evidence on the superiority of 1 reconstruction technique over the other in terms of rotation laxity can be obtained because of several variations in the experimental protocol and the kinematics used to measure the rotational laxity among the studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, meta-analysis.

Current concepts in anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

An anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is one of the most common orthopedic sport injuries. The ACL consists of 2 functional bundles-the anteromedial and posterolateral-which are named for the position of their insertion sites on the tibia. Anatomic ACL reconstruction can be defined as the restoration of the ACL to its native dimensions, collagen orientation, and insertion sites. Some biomechanical studies have demonstrated that anatomic ACL reconstruction can restore knee motion significantly similar to that of the normal knee, as compared with traditional, nonanatomic single-bundle procedures. In vivo kinematic studies have also shown that nonanatomic single-bundle reconstruction fails to restore normal dynamic knee stability in all cases. Accurate restoration of knee kinematics with anatomic ACL reconstruction is critical to protect against the possibility that nonatomic surgical technique could result in early osteoarthritis, which is common in patients who sustain ACL tears. Surgical techniques for ACL reconstruction vary, and if different aspects of the surgery are compared for superiority (eg, single- vs double-bundle techniques), it is necessary that both procedures meet criteria to be designated as "anatomic." By emphasizing the importance of restoring the native anatomy of the knee, surgeons can give their patients the best chance at restoration of joint function and preservation of long-term knee health.

Radiographic landmarks for tunnel positioning in double-bundle ACL reconstructions

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to establish quantitative and qualitative radiographic landmarks for identifying the femoral and tibial attachment sites of the AM and PL bundles of the native ACL and to assess the reproducibility of identification of these landmarks using intraclass correlation coefficients. It was hypothesized that the radiographic positions of the AM and PL bundles could be defined in relation to anatomic landmarks and radiographic reference lines.

METHODS

The femoral and tibial attachment sites of the AM and PL bundles on twelve cadaveric knees were labeled with radio-opaque markers. The positions of the AM and PL bundle attachment sites were quantified on radiographs by three independent examiners.

RESULTS

On the lateral femoral view, the AM bundle was located at 21.6 ± 5.6% of the sagittal diameter of the femur drawn along Blumensaat's line and 14.2 ± 7.7% distal to the notch roof along the maximum notch height. The PL bundle was located at 28.9 ± 4.6% of the sagittal diameter and 42.3 ± 6.0% of the notch height. The knee flexion angle at which the AM and PL bundle attachment sites were horizontally oriented was 115 ± 7.1°. On the tibial AP view, the AM and PL bundles were located at 44.2 ± 3.4 and 50.1 ± 2.1%, respectively, from the medial aspect of the tibia along its coronal diameter. On the lateral view, the distances from the AM and PL bundles to the anterior tibial margin measured along the tibial sagittal diameter were 36.3 ± 3.8 and 51.0 ± 4.0%, respectively. The center of the PL bundle attachment was located almost precisely at the center of the tibial plateau in both the coronal and sagittal planes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study defines the radiographic locations of the femoral and tibial bundle attachment sites of the native ACL and a reliable and transferrable protocol for identifying these sites on radiographs in relation to surrounding landmarks and digitally projected reference lines. In addition, it was found that the femoral attachments of the AM and PL bundles were horizontally aligned at 115° of knee flexion and the PL bundle tibial attachment was located essentially at the center of the tibia.

Anatomic double-bundle anterior crucial ligament reconstruction with G-ST

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) consists of two primal functional bundles, anteromedial bundle and posterolateral bundles. Those two bundles play different functional roles and contribute differently to knee stability throughout the range of motion. Recent advancement in studies of anatomy and biomechanics of ACL has led surgeons to perform double-bundle ACL reconstruction to obtain better stability and kinematics. Consequently, variable surgical techniques of double-bundle ACL reconstruction have been reported to replicate native ACL. In addition, various surgical key points and problems in double-bundle ACL reconstruction techniques have also been reported. There has been a trend to more anatomically replicate native ACL bundles, not simply creating two bundles. We summarize the basic knowledge and current concepts of anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction using hamstrings tendons.

Arthroscopically pertinent landmarks for tunnel positioning in single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions

BACKGROUND

Quantification of the overall anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundle centers in respect to arthroscopically pertinent bony and soft tissue landmarks has not been thoroughly assessed.

HYPOTHESIS

A standardized anatomical measurement method can quantitate the locations of the ACL and AM and PL bundle centers in reference to each other and anatomical landmarks.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

Quantification of the ACL and its bundle attachments was performed on 11 cadaveric knees using a radio frequency-tracking device.

RESULTS

The tibial ACL attachment center was 7.5 mm medial to the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus, 13.0 mm anterior to the retro-eminence ridge, and 10.5 mm posterior to the ACL ridge. The femoral ACL attachment center was 1.7 mm proximal to the bifurcate ridge and 6.1 mm posterior to the lateral intercondylar ridge. The tibial AM attachment center was 8.3 mm medial to the anteromedial aspect of the lateral meniscus anterior horn, 17.8 mm anterior to the retro-eminence ridge, and 5.6 mm posterior to the ACL ridge. The femoral AM attachment center was 4.8 mm proximal to the bifurcate ridge and 7.1 mm posterior to the lateral intercondylar ridge. The tibial PL bundle attachment center was 6.6 mm medial to the posteromedial aspect of the lateral meniscus anterior horn, 10.8 mm anteromedial to the root attachment of the lateral meniscus posterior horn, and 8.4 mm anterior to the retro-eminence ridge. The femoral PL bundle attachment center was 5.2 mm distal to the bifurcate ridge and 3.6 mm posterior to the lateral intercondylar ridge.

CONCLUSION

The authors developed a comprehensive compilation of measurements of arthroscopically pertinent bony and soft tissue landmarks that quantitate the ACL and its individual bundle attachment centers on the tibia and femur.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

These clinically relevant arthroscopic landmarks may enhance single- and double-bundle ACL reconstructions through improved tunnel placement.

Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, using CT-based navigation and fiducial markers

PURPOSE

Accurate placement of separate anteromedial and posterolateral bundle bone tunnels is crucial for anatomic, double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, identifying the anatomic footprint at which to make the tibial and femoral bone tunnels is not a straightforward procedure. To overcome this problem, we used a CT-based navigation technique with a registration procedure based on fiducial markers (FMs).

METHODS

Preoperatively, 10 FM points were placed on skin around knee joint and scanned with CT. Imaging data of the knee were recorded on the computer system for preoperative registration and surgical planning. Intraoperatively, with a reference frame fixed to the distal medial aspect of femur and tibia, paired-point matching registration was performed with the use of points marked on skin through FM center holes. During tibial tunnel guide wire placement, tibial aiming guide with tracking device fed back the position of tip and direction of the guide wire on the three-dimensional (3D) tibia bone surface image and multiple image planes in real time. For the femoral side, the navigation pointer was placed at the footprint center with visual guidance of 3D image of lateral wall sagittal view on navigation monitor and marked with navigation awl.

RESULTS

The average registration accuracy of 22 consecutive patients was 0.7 ± 0.2 mm and 0.6 ± 0.2 mm for femoral and tibial bone, respectively. Most of the bone tunnel positions evaluated with 3D-CT image were confirmed to be accurately placed in reference to the preoperative plan. There was no damage to femoral condyle cartilage and no other complication.

CONCLUSION

This new CT-based computer navigation system opens the possibility for surgeons to plan bone tunnel positioning preoperatively and control it during technically demanding anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Health-related quality of life after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

Recently the patients' own evaluation has become an important complement to post-operative clinical assessments. For many patients, there is a change in life situation after an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL), which may affect the health-related quality of life in many ways. The aims of the study were to evaluate the results in terms of health-related quality of life 2-7 years after an ACL reconstruction and to compare the results with a gender- and age-matched control group. Furthermore, to compare the results for males and females using either the bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft (BPTB) or hamstring tendon autograft (HT).

METHODS

The SF-36 questionnaire was send by mail to 793 consecutive patients after an ACL reconstruction. Five hundred and forty-four (69%) patients returned the questionnaires leaving 419 patients (161 female, 258 male) who were analysed and matched to a Swedish control group (n = 2,410).

RESULTS

The patient group obtained significantly higher scores for General Health (GH), Social Function (SF), Role Emotional (RE) and Mental Health (MH). The control group obtained significantly higher scores for Physical Function (PF) compared with the total ACL group and with the BPTB and HS subgroups. There were no significant differences between males and females.

CONCLUSION

After ACL reconstruction, the patients reported good health-related quality of life in comparison with a matched sample of the general population. To incorporate non-disease-specific health assessment measures are important to further refine the disease-specific outcome measurements to evaluate the effect of the treatments and provide cost-effective treatment algorithms.

Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) introduces several diagnostic and technical challenges in comparison with primary ACL reconstruction. With the increasing numbers of original reconstructions combined with the continued expectation of high-level athletic participation, revision ACL reconstruction is likely to become more frequent. The purpose of this article was to summarize the causes of failure and the evaluation of the patient with recurrent instability. A review of the literature regarding results after revision ACL reconstruction was performed to assist in the decision-making process and patient counseling. Good results can be obtained in terms of functional stability after revision reconstruction, but chondral and meniscal injury as well as unrecognized associated pathologic instability may play a role in diminished outcomes. In addition, a wide variety of surgical techniques are reviewed to address problems associated with tunnel malposition, widening, and pre-existing hardware.

Fifteen-year outcome of endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft for "isolated" anterior cruciate ligament tear

BACKGROUND

Few studies report the long-term results of anterior cruciate ligament rupture and single-incision endoscopic reconstructive surgery. Outcomes are often clouded by concomitant meniscal, chondral, or ligament injuries.

PURPOSE

To determine the 15-year outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament ruptures treated with endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using middle-third patellar tendon autograft.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Between January 1993 and April 1994, 333 consecutive patients underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Patients with associated ligamentous injury requiring surgery, previous meniscectomy, or meniscal injury requiring more than one-third meniscectomy; chondral injury diagnosed at arthroscopy; and an abnormal contralateral knee were excluded. Ninety patients met the inclusion criteria. Outcomes included range of motion, Lachman and pivot-shift tests, instrumented ligament testing, single-legged hop test, Lysholm Knee Score, the International Knee Documentation Committee evaluation, and radiographic assessment.

RESULTS

Thirty percent of patients had further anterior cruciate ligament injury. Twenty-four percent of patients (n = 22) sustained contralateral anterior cruciate ligament ruptures, and 8% (n = 7) ruptured the graft (P = .009). Graft rupture was associated with a graft inclination angle <17° (P = .02). Contralateral anterior cruciate ligament rupture was associated with age <18 years at time of primary injury (P = .001). All patients had normal or nearly normal (International Knee Documentation Committee evaluation) Lachman and instrumented testing, and 91% had a negative pivot-shift result. Seventy percent of patients had kneeling pain. Median subjective International Knee Documentation Committee evaluation was 91 of 100. Fifty-one percent of patients had radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis (41% grade B; 10% grade C).

CONCLUSION

Good results are maintained at 15 years after surgery with respect to ligamentous stability, subjective outcomes, and range of motion. Kneeling pain remains a significant problem. Concern remains regarding the incidence of further anterior cruciate ligament injury and the increasing number of patients with radiographic and clinical signs of osteoarthritis despite surgical stabilization.

Graft selection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Background

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgical reconstruction is performed with the use of an autogenic, allogenic or synthetic graft. The document issued by the Italian National Guidelines System (SNLG, Sistema Nazionale Linee Guida) at the National Institute of Health aims to guide orthopaedic surgeons in selecting the optimal graft for ACL reconstruction using an evidence-based approach.

Materials and methods

A monodisciplinary panel was formed to define a restricted number of clinical questions, develop specific search strategies and critically appraise the literature using the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) method. The final draft was shared by the panel and then sent to four external referees to assess its readability and clarity, its clinical relevance and the feasibility of recommendations.

Results

Autograft shows moderate superiority compared with allograft, in relation to the relevant outcomes and the quality of selected evidence, after an appropriate risk–benefit assessment. Allograft shows higher failure rate and higher risk of infection. The panel recommends use of autografts; patellar tendon should be the first choice, due to its higher stability, while use of hamstring is indicated for subjects for whom knee pain can represent a particular problem (e.g., some categories of workers).

Conclusions

Autograft shows better performance compared with allograft and no significant heterogeneity in relation to relevant outcomes. The GRADE method allowed collation of all the information needed to draw up the recommendations, and to highlight the core points for discussion.

The relationship between functional levels and fear-avoidance beliefs following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Background

The purpose of this study is to assess the relationship between functional levels in activities of daily living and sports and fear-avoidance beliefs in patients with a history of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), after controlling for injury-related variables and physical impairment measures.

Patients and methods

Forty-eight subjects (34 men, 14 women; age 20.6 ± 1.2 years), at a mean of 31.7 ± 16.2 months following ACLR, participated in this study. Functional levels in activities of daily living and sports were assessed with the Knee Outcome Survey (KOS) Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADLS) and Sports Activity Scale (SAS). Fear-avoidance beliefs were assessed with the physical activity subscale of the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ), which was adapted for use in patients with knee pathology. Injury-related variables included whether or not additional knee surgery was performed after the initial ACLR and the number of months from the most recent ACLR to participation in this study. Physical impairment measures included single-leg hop capabilities, quadriceps strength, and anterior knee joint laxity.

Results

Hierarchical linear regression analysis revealed that scores on the physical activity subscale of the FABQ contributed significantly to KOS ADLS and SAS scores after accounting for injury-related variables and physical impairment measures. The final regression model accounted for 61% of the variance in KOS ADLS and SAS scores (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

These results suggest that fear-avoidance beliefs following ACLR can potentially adversely influence functional levels in activities of daily living and sports.

Analysis of return to competition and repeat rupture for 298 anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with patellar or hamstring tendon autograft in sportspeople

OBJECTIVES

To establish the influence of the type of surgical technique, competitive level, type of sport and the time before returning to competition on the reinjury rate after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery.

METHODS

The authors followed-up 540 competitive sportspeople who had undergone ACL surgery via patellar or hamstring tendon autograft (HTA) techniques in 2003 and 2004. The sportspeople (all of whom had competed at a regional or higher level) were asked to fill out a questionnaire during their fourth postoperative year.

RESULTS

The 298 respondees (reply rate: 55.1%) had the same characteristics as the initial (operated) population. The reinjury rates after HTA and patellar tendon autograft (PTA) were 12.7 and 6.1%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between these two values (P=0.14). Age and gender were not correlated with the frequency of reinjury. The reinjury rate rose slightly with increasing competitive level (regional level: 8.1%; national level: 10.4%; international level: 12.5%) but these differences were not statistically significant. Soccer had the highest reinjury rate (20.8%). Regardless of the surgical technique, sportspeople returning to competition within seven months of surgery had a greater risk of reinjury than those returning after this time point (15.3 versus 5.2%, P=0.014). The risk dropped from 13.9 to 2.6% (P=0.047) for PTA and from 16.6 to 7.6% (P=0.2) for HTA. Of the four reinjuries in sportspeople returning to competition with the first six months postoperative, three occurred within one month of resumption.

CONCLUSION

Post-HTA reinjury rates are higher than post-PTA rates but the difference is not statistically significant. For sportspeople at a regional or higher level, the time interval before the return to competition has an influence on the risk of reinjury.

Return to play after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in National Football League athletes

BACKGROUND

Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a common and potentially career-threatening injury in the National Football League (NFL). The return to play (RTP) percentage and the factors affecting RTP after ACL reconstruction in NFL players are not well defined.

PURPOSE

To determine the actual rate of return to professional football play in the NFL after ACL reconstruction surgery and to determine what factors can predict ability to RTP. We hypothesize that the RTP percentage in this unique patient population will differ from previously reported populations.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Forty-nine NFL athletes who had undergone primary ACL reconstruction at our institution were followed to determine their RTP percentages and factors predicting RTP.

RESULTS

Sixty-three percent (31 of 49) of NFL athletes returned to NFL game play at an average of 10.8 months after surgery. Age at time of surgery, position, and the type and number of procedures were not significantly different between those who did and did not return to play. The average number of games before surgery was 51 for those who did return to play and 28 for those who did not (P = .039). The odds ratio favoring RTP was 5.5 (P = .016) for those players who had more than 4 years of NFL experience before surgery. The average NFL draft round was 3.4 for the group who returned to play and 6.4 for those who did not (P < .001). The odds ratio favoring RTP was 12.2 (P < .001) for those players drafted in the first 4 rounds of the NFL draft compared with those drafted after the fourth round.

CONCLUSIONS

The RTP rates after ACL reconstruction in NFL football players are lower than previously perceived. More experienced and established athletes are more likely to return to competition at the same level after this procedure than those with less professional experience. Being selected in the first 4 rounds of the NFL draft was highly predictive of RTP.

Navigated knee kinematics after tear of the ACL and its secondary restraints: preliminary results

In this study we evaluated the role of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and its secondary restraint in controlling knee stability using a navigation system. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the kinematics of the knee in different conditions of instability: ACL intact, after transection of the posterolateral (PL) bundle, after transection of the anteromedial (AM) bundle, and after lesion of the anterolateral femorotibial ligament (ALFTL). Anterior tibial translation and rotation were measured with a computer navigation system in 6 knees in whole fresh-frozen human cadavers by use of a manual maximum load. Anterior translation was evaluated at 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion; rotation at 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° of flexion. Cutting the PL bundle does not increase anterior translation and rotation of the knee. Cutting the AM bundle significantly increased the anteroposterior (AP) translation at 30° and 60° of flexion (P=.01), but does not increase rotation of the knee. Cutting the ALFTL increased anterior translation at 60° of flexion (P=.04) and rotation at 30°, 45°, and 60° of flexion (P=.03). The PL bundle does not affect anterior translation and rotation of the knee. The AM bundle is the primary restraint of the anterior translation but does not affect rotation of the knee. The lateral compartment becomes the primary restraint of rotation after ACL cut. The primary kinematic effect of an ACL injury is an increase in anterior tibial translation, but there is no significant change in maximum internal or external rotation. The lesion of the ALFTL increases tibial rotation and could be correlated to the pivot shift phenomenon.

Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction restores patellofemoral contact areas and pressures more closely than nonanatomic single-bundle reconstruction

PURPOSE

To investigate the effects of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency and nonanatomic single-bundle (SB) and anatomic double-bundle (DB) ACL reconstruction on the contact characteristics of the patellofemoral (PF) joint.

METHODS

By use of a materials testing system, 7 fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were tested. The following states were tested: ACL-intact knee, nonanatomic SB ACL reconstruction, anatomic DB ACL reconstruction, and ACL-deficient knee. Hamstring autografts were used. PF contact pressures and areas were measured with pressure-sensitive film at 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion with a constant 100-N load on the quadriceps tendon.

RESULTS

The total contact area of ACL-deficient and nonanatomic SB ACL-reconstructed knees (123.8 ± 63.9 and 149.6 ± 79.3 mm(2), respectively) significantly decreased when compared with those of the intact knee (206.1 ± 83.6 mm(2)) at 30° of knee flexion. The lateral-facet peak pressure of ACL-deficient and nonanatomic SB ACL-reconstructed knees (1.12 ± 0.52 and 1.22 ± 0.54 MPa, respectively) significantly decreased when compared with those of the intact knee (0.68 ± 0.38 MPa) at 90° of knee flexion. Anatomic DB ACL reconstruction restored the contact pressures and areas to values similar to those of the intact knee (no significant difference).

CONCLUSIONS

ACL deficiency resulted in a significant decrease in the total and medial PF contact areas and in an increase in the lateral PF contact pressure. Anatomic DB ACL reconstruction more closely restored normal PF contact area and pressure than did nonanatomic SB ACL reconstruction.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Our findings suggest that the changes in the PF contact area and pressures in ACL deficiency and after nonanatomic SB ACL reconstruction may be one of the causes of PF osteoarthritis or other related PF problems found at long-term follow-up. Anatomic DB ACL reconstruction may reduce the incidence of PF problems by closely restoring the contact area and pressure.

Intraoperative comparison of knee laxity between anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee and contralateral stable knee using navigation system

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to compare knee laxity between anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-reconstructed knees and contralateral stable knees by use of intraoperative navigation.

METHODS

Five patients with ipsilateral ACL-deficient knees with contralateral stable knees without any ligament injuries were included in this study. Anteroposterior (AP) knee laxity during anterior drawer force applied manually and range of tibial rotation and AP knee laxity during internal and external rotational torque applied manually in both the ACL-deficient knee and the contralateral stable knee were measured by use of a navigation system from 15 degrees to 90 degrees of knee flexion. After the temporary fixation of the posterolateral bundle, anteromedial bundle (AMB), or double-bundle (DB) reconstruction, knee laxity was measured again and compared with that of the stable knee.

RESULTS

The mean laxities for PLB reconstruction were significantly greater than those of the contralateral stable knee at more than 75 degrees of knee flexion (P < .05). The mean laxities for AMB or DB reconstruction were not significantly different from those of the contralateral stable knee at all knee flexion angles. Those for AMB reconstruction were within +1.6 mm and those for DB reconstruction were within -2.0 mm of those of the contralateral stable knee. The mean rotations for all reconstructions were significantly less than those of the contralateral stable knee at less than 30 degrees of knee flexion (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

DB and AMB reconstructions could restore knee laxity closer to the level of the contralateral stable knee. Because normal knee laxity is different in each individual, evaluation of contralateral stable knee laxity during ACL reconstruction surgery would be helpful for restoration to the level of the specific preinjury knee laxity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Simultaneous bilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a safe option

When patients present with bilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency and require reconstruction in both knees, a single setting or staged approach can be adopted. Although single-setting reconstruction has been described, there are no published case series that describe simultaneous bilateral ACL reconstruction. We report a case series of eight patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral ACL reconstruction. We used two-camera stack systems to allow for truly simultaneous bilateral surgery by two surgical teams. At 2 weeks, all patients were independent in mobility. There was no difference in pivot shift, Lysholm and Tegner scores at 1 year when compared to published outcomes for unilateral ACL reconstruction. The median duration of follow-up was 28 months (range 12-50 months). Based on these small numbers, our results demonstrate that simultaneous bilateral ACL reconstruction is a safe and clinically effective option when using either hamstring or patella tendon graft.

Quality of life and clinical outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon graft or quadrupled semitendinosus graft: an 8-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials after anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with long-term follow-up including assessment of health-related quality of life are rare.

PURPOSE

To compare clinical outcome and health-related quality of life 8 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 2 types of graft.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

Long-term follow-up of 164 patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury randomized to arthroscopic reconstruction with a quadrupled semitendinosus graft or a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft was undertaken. After a mean 8 years, 153 patients were available for follow-up, including instrumented laxity, 1-legged hop test, a knee-walking test, and assessment with International Knee Documentation Committee, Lysholm, Tegner, and patellofemoral pain score. Health-related quality of life was assessed with Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Short Form-36.

RESULTS

Patients in both graft groups retained the same stability, knee function, and health-related quality of life. The patellofemoral pain score was similar for both groups; the bone-patellar tendon-bone group had more donor site morbidity from kneeling and knee walking. In the bone-patellar tendon-bone group, 19 patients had no kneeling problems, 23 slight problems, 31 moderate problems, and 5 unable to kneel. Corresponding figures for the semitendinosus group were 25, 32, 16, and 2 (P < .001). Patients with early reconstructions (<5 months) had a lower risk for meniscal injuries (37%) than did later reconstructed (62%, P = .008). Health-related quality of life regarding physical functioning in Short Form-36 was better for the early-reconstructed patients than for the later reconstructed (92 vs 85; P = .014). Patients without medial meniscal surgery had higher Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores for all subscales than did patients with medial meniscal surgery, with most significant difference for sport and recreation (63 vs 75, P = .008).

CONCLUSION

In the long term, the semitendinosus graft provided similar stability, knee function, and health-related quality of life but with less kneeling morbidity than did the bone-patellar tendon-bone graft.

Evaluation of the bone bridge between the bone tunnels after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a multidetector computed tomography study

BACKGROUND

Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a technically demanding procedure; it requires drilling 2 tibial and 2 femoral tunnels. Tunnel communication, whether intraoperative or postoperative, is a serious complication: It jeopardizes knee stability and graft function.

HYPOTHESIS

During double-bundle ACL reconstruction, special aimers would be helpful to avoid intraoperative bone bridge fracture. The bone bridge between the bone tunnels would maintain its structural integrity, and no tunnel communication would be observed postoperatively because of tunnel widening.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

This prospective study included 32 patients undergoing double-bundle ACL reconstruction. A multidetector computed tomography study was performed at a mean of 17 months postoperatively. The thickness of the bone bridge between the bone tunnels was measured in the femoral and tibial sides on an axial and sagittal plane, respectively, at 3 locations: the level of the joint line, the midportion of the bone bridge, and the base of the bone bridge. The bone density of the bone bridge was measured in Hounsfield units in the same locations. Bone density of the anterior tibial cortex and lateral femoral condyle was measured for comparisons.

RESULTS

Tunnel communication occurred intraoperatively in 1 patient on the tibial side at the level of the joint line. In the rest of the patients, a well-defined triangular bone bridge was present between the 2 tunnels in the femoral and tibial sides. The thickness at the apex of the bone bridge was 2.0 and 2.2 mm for the femur and tibia, respectively. In addition, the density of the bone bridge at its apex was similar to that of cortical bone.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that double-bundle ACL reconstruction, as used with anatomic aimers, produces a low rate of tunnel convergence. The bone bridge remains intact postoperatively, although it is thin at the level of the joint line.

A randomized trial of treatment for acute anterior cruciate ligament tears

BACKGROUND

The optimal management of a torn anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) of the knee is unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, controlled trial involving 121 young, active adults with acute ACL injury in which we compared two strategies: structured rehabilitation plus early ACL reconstruction and structured rehabilitation with the option of later ACL reconstruction if needed. The primary outcome was the change from baseline to 2 years in the average score on four subscales of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)--pain, symptoms, function in sports and recreation, and knee-related quality of life (KOOS(4); range of scores, 0 [worst] to 100 [best]). Secondary outcomes included results on all five KOOS subscales, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, and the score on the Tegner Activity Scale.

RESULTS

Of 62 subjects assigned to rehabilitation plus early ACL reconstruction, 1 did not undergo surgery. Of 59 assigned to rehabilitation plus optional delayed ACL reconstruction, 23 underwent delayed ACL reconstruction; the other 36 underwent rehabilitation alone. The absolute change in the mean KOOS(4) score from baseline to 2 years was 39.2 points for those assigned to rehabilitation plus early ACL reconstruction and 39.4 for those assigned to rehabilitation plus optional delayed reconstruction (absolute between-group difference, 0.2 points; 95% confidence interval, -6.5 to 6.8; P=0.96 after adjustment for the baseline score). There were no significant differences between the two treatment groups with respect to secondary outcomes. Adverse events were common in both groups. The results were similar when the data were analyzed according to the treatment actually received.

CONCLUSIONS

In young, active adults with acute ACL tears, a strategy of rehabilitation plus early ACL reconstruction was not superior to a strategy of rehabilitation plus optional delayed ACL reconstruction. The latter strategy substantially reduced the frequency of surgical reconstructions. (Funded by the Swedish Research Council and the Medical Faculty of Lund University and others; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN84752559.)