Tubulocystic carcinoma of the kidney: clinicopathologic analysis of 31 cases of a distinctive rare subtype of renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33:384-392. [PMID: 19011562 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0b013e3181872d3f]

Rare (<1%) histological subtypes of renal cell carcinoma: an update

Recent advances in genetics and pathology have allowed description of several new histological subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) as well as better characterization of other rare subtypes. We herein present a comprehensive review of taxonomy, epidemiology, pathology, imaging findings, and natural history of a wide spectrum of rare subtypes of RCCs that individually constitute <1% of all the RCCs.

An overview of renal cell cancer: pathology and genetics

Renal cell carcinoma is a group of malignancies arising from the epithelium of the renal tubules. The pattern of somatic mutations in kidney tumors has been extensively investigated. In the current 2004 WHO classification, the molecular background of a renal tumor has become, in addition to histopathology, a major criterion for tumor classification. The goal of this review is to discuss morphology and genetics of adult renal epithelial cancer included in the 2004 WHO classification and to mention renal tumor types, which are not considered in the current WHO classification. Further, pathologic considerations with clinical and prognostic implications are provided.

Mucin-secreting clear cell renal cell carcinoma. A rare variant of conventional renal cell carcinoma

We report herein one case of conventional renal cell carcinoma (RCC) producing extensive extracellular mucinous secretion in a 71-year-old man. To the best of our knowledge, the presence of mucinous secretion in this tumor has not been documented. Mucin production, despite its low frequency, can be considered an additional feature of conventional RCC. Therefore, clear cell RCC should be added to the list of parenchymal renal tumors that can show significant mucin secretion; and it should be included in the inventory of morphologic variations of this tumor, which may cause diagnostic difficulties. It is of primary importance to distinguish mucin-secreting clear cell RCC from the metastasis of a mucin-secreting tumor to conventional RCC. Presence of mucin in a clear cell carcinoma does not exclude a renal origin.

Synchronous clear cell renal cell carcinoma and tubulocystic carcinoma: genetic evidence of independent ontogenesis and implications of chromosomal imbalances in tumor progression

Seven percent of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cases are diagnosed as "unclassified" RCC by morphology. Genetic profiling of RCCs helps define renal tumor subtypes, especially in cases where morphologic diagnosis is inconclusive. This report describes a patient with synchronous clear cell RCC (ccRCC) and a tubulocystic renal carcinoma (TCRC) in the same kidney, and discusses the pathologic features and genetic profile of both tumors. A 67 year-old male underwent CT scans for an unrelated medical event. Two incidental renal lesions were found and ultimately removed by radical nephrectomy. The smaller lesion had multiple small cystic spaces lined by hobnail cells with high nuclear grade separated by fibrous stroma. This morphology and the expression of proximal (CD10, AMACR) and distal tubule cell (CK19) markers by immunohistochemistry supported the diagnosis of TCRC. The larger lesion was a typical ccRCC, with Fuhrman's nuclear grade 3 and confined to the kidney. Molecular characterization of both neoplasms using virtual karyotyping was performed to assess relatedness of these tumors. Low grade areas (Fuhrman grade 2) of the ccRCC showed loss of 3p and gains in chromosomes 5 and 7, whereas oncocytic areas displayed additional gain of 2p and loss of 10q; the high grade areas (Fuhrman grade 3) showed several additional imbalances. In contrast, the TCRC demonstrated a distinct profile with gains of chromosomes 8 and 17 and loss of 9. In conclusion, ccRCC and TCRC show distinct genomic copy number profiles and chromosomal imbalances in TCRC might be implicated in the pathogenesis of this tumor. Second, the presence of a ccRCC with varying degrees of differentiation exemplifies the sequence of chromosomal imbalances acquired during tumor progression.

[Tubulocystic carcinoma of the kidney]

A 55-year-old man who presented himself with gross hematuria and right back pain was found to have a right renal mass with evidence of metastasis to the lymph nodes, bone and lung (cT1bN1M1). He underwent a transperitoneal right nephrectomy. Tumor expressed markers of CD10, P504S and CK19 immunohistochemically, so histopathological examination revealed tubulocystic carcinoma of the right kidney (pT3a). After the patient received sunitinib therapy, computed tomography revealed reduction in the size of the metastatic lung nodule and lymph nodes, indicating a partial response. He is alive without disease progression at 12 months after nephrectomy. Tubulocystic carcinoma has been referred to by Amin et al as low-grade collecting duct carcinoma and is not yet included in the World Health Organization (WHO) 2004 classification of renal tumors. The cells lining the tumor range from cuboidal to columnar and have large nuclei with low-grade changes and abundant eosinophilic or amphophilic cytoplasm. Hobnail cells are commonly seen. Immunohistochemically, tubulocystic carcinomas are strongly positive for markers of the proximal nephron (CD10, P504S) and the distal nephron (parvalbumin, CK19). Despite a low nuclear grade, tubulocystic carcinomas occasionally show progressive behavior clinically. Although there is no established salvage therapy, sunitinib was found to be effective for this patient.

Genomic profiling of renal cell carcinoma in patients with end-stage renal disease

The purpose of the present study was to determine the genomic profile of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) by analyzing genomic copy number aberrations. Seventy-nine tumor samples from 63 patients with RCC-ESRD were analyzed by array comparative genomic hybridization using the Agilent Whole Human Genome 4 × 44K Oligo Micro Array (Agilent Technologies Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis revealed that the 63 cases could be divided into two groups, Clusters A and B. Cluster A was comprised mainly of clear cell RCC (CCRCC), whereas Cluster B was comprised mainly of papillary RCC (PRCC), acquired cystic disease (ACD)-associated RCC, and clear cell papillary RCC. Analysis of the averaged frequencies revealed that the genomic profiles of Clusters A and B resembled those of sporadic CCRCC and sporadic PRCC, respectively. Although it has been proposed on the basis of histopathology that ACD-associated RCC, clear cell papillary RCC and PRCC-ESRD are distinct subtypes, the present data reveal that the genomic profiles of these types, categorized as Cluster B, resemble one another. Furthermore, the genomic profiles of PRCC, ACD-associated RCC and clear cell papillary RCC admixed in one tissue tended to resemble one another. On the basis of genomic profiling of RCC-ESRD, we conclude that the molecular pathogenesis of CCRCC-ESRD resembles that of sporadic CCRCC. Although various histologic subtypes of non-clear cell RCC-ESRD have been proposed, their genomic profiles resemble those of sporadic PRCC, suggesting that the molecular pathogenesis of non-CCRCC-ESRD may be related to that of sporadic PRCC.

Systemic therapy for metastatic non-clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: recent progress and future directions

Insights into the biology of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) have identified multiple pathways associated with the pathogenesis and progression of this cancer. This progress has led to the development of multiple agents targeting these pathways, including the tyrosine kinase inhibitors sorafenib, sunitinib, and pazopanib, the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab, and the mTOR inhibitors temsirolimus and everolimus. With the exception of temsirolimus, phase 3 trials tested these agents in patients with clear-cell histology; therefore, their efficacy in non-CCRCC is unclear. To date, there is no established effective therapy for patients with advanced non-CCRCC. This article focuses on treatment options for metastatic non-CCRCC.

Current pathology keys of renal cell carcinoma

CONTEXT

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in adults comprises a heterogeneous group of tumours with variable clinical outcomes that range from indolent to overtly malignant. The application of molecular genetic techniques to the study of renal neoplasms has resulted in an improved classification of these entities and a better understanding of the biologic mechanisms responsible for tumour development and progression. The current 2004 World Health Organisation classification of adult renal epithelial neoplasms has expanded rapidly with new categories recently incorporated.

OBJECTIVE

To review and evaluate the evidence implicating pathologic features and classification of RCC in adults as a tool to approach patients' prognosis and modulate current therapy.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Members of Committee 3: Pathology, under the auspices of the International Consultation on Urological Diseases and the European Association of Urology (ICUD-EAU) International Consultation on Kidney Cancer, performed a systematic review using PubMed. Participating pathologists discussed pathologic categories and diagnostic features of RCC in adults.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We reviewed and discussed articles and the personal experiences of participating uropathologists.

CONCLUSIONS

The conclusions reached by the ICUD-EAU 2010 International Consultation on Kidney Cancer emphasise the appropriate pathologic diagnosis of RCC in adults as a tool to approach patients' prognosis and modulate current therapy. Further emphasis should be placed on defining risk groups of RCC and diagnostic features of unusual tumours such as familial RCC, translocation RCC, and tubular mucinous and spindle cell carcinoma. A number of recently described entities and morphologic variants of classical categories deserves recognition because they can be important in differential diagnosis and therapy.

VHL mutations and dysregulation of pVHL- and PTEN-controlled pathways in multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma

Multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma is a rare renal cell carcinoma with an excellent prognosis. To clarify the relationship with typical clear cell renal cell carcinoma, we evaluated 15 cases of multilocular cystic renal cell carcinomas diagnosed according to the 2004 WHO classification. Von Hippel Lindau (VHL) gene mutations were determined by whole genome amplification and direct sequencing. Carbonic anhydrase 9 (CAIX), a hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) target, paired box gene 2 (PAX2), cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27 and glycogen synthase kinase 3-β (GSK3β) were immunohistochemically evaluated as members of the VHL protein (pVHL)- and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)-controlled pathways. VHL mutations were identified in 3 of 12 (25%) tumors. Inactivated GSK3β, decreased PTEN expression and PAX2 positivity were observed in the vast majority of the multilocular cystic renal cell carcinomas. Strong nuclear staining of p27 was seen in 14 of 15 cases. Compared with multilocular cystic renal cell carcinomas, expression frequencies of PAX2, p-GSK3β, PTEN and CAIX were similar in a set of low-grade, early-stage clear cell renal cell carcinomas, whereas only 30% had strong p27 positivity. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that multilocular cystic renal cell carcinomas are related at the molecular level with clear cell renal cell carcinomas. Maintenance of a strong subcellular p27 expression in all multilocular cystic renal cell carcinomas analyzed may in part explain the excellent prognosis of these tumor patients.

Immunohistochemical diagnosis of renal neoplasms

CONTEXT

Histologic diagnosis of renal neoplasm is usually straightforward by routine light microscopy. However, immunomarkers may be essential in several contexts, including differentiating renal from nonrenal neoplasms, subtyping of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and diagnosing rare types of renal neoplasms or metastatic RCC in small biopsy specimens.

OBJECTIVE

To provide a comprehensive review of the diagnostic utility of immunomarkers for renal neoplasms.

DESIGN

This review is based on published literature and personal experience.

CONCLUSIONS

The following markers may have diagnostic utility in various diagnostic contexts: cytokeratins, vimentin, α-methylacyl coenzyme A racemase, carbonic anhydrase IX, PAX2, PAX8, RCC marker, CD10, E-cadherin, kidney-specific cadherin, parvalbumin, claudin-7, claudin-8, S100A1, CD82, CD117, TFE3, thrombomodulin, uroplakin III, p63, and S100P. Cytokeratins are uniformly expressed by RCC, albeit in a somewhat limited amount in some subtypes, requiring broad-spectrum anti-CK antibodies, including both low- and high-molecular-weight cytokeratins. PAX2 and PAX8 are sensitive and relatively specific markers for renal neoplasm, regardless of subtype. CD10 and RCC marker are sensitive to renal cell neoplasms derived from proximal tubules, including clear cell and papillary RCCs. Kidney-specific cadherin, parvalbumin, claudin-7, and claudin-8 are sensitive markers for renal neoplasms from distal portions of the nephron, including chromophobe RCC and oncocytoma. CK7 and α-methylacyl coenzyme A racemase are sensitive markers for papillary RCC; TFE3 expression is essential in confirming the diagnosis of Xp11 translocation RCC. The potentially difficult differential diagnosis between chromophobe RCC and oncocytoma may be facilitated by S100A1 and CD82. Thrombomodulin, uroplakin III, p63, and S100P are useful markers for urothelial carcinoma. Together with high-molecular-weight cytokeratins, PAX2, and PAX8, they can help differentiate renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma from collecting duct RCC. A sensitive marker for sarcomatoid RCC is still not available. Immunomarkers are most often used for diagnosing metastatic RCC. Compared with primary RCC, expression of the above-mentioned markers is often less frequent and less diffuse in the metastatic setting. Recognizing the variable sensitivity and specificity of these markers, it is important to include at least CD10, RCC marker, PAX2, and PAX8 in the diagnostic panel.

Tubulocystic renal carcinoma: a clinical perspective

INTRODUCTION

Tubulocystic renal carcinoma (TCRC) is a recently described neoplastic entity. To date, clinicopathological features on less than hundred cases of these rare tumours have been characterized exclusively in the pathological literature. Herein, we present five additional cases emphasizing clinical aspects on these rare renal neoplasms.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Cases diagnosed as TCRC were retrieved and reviewed from the routine and consultation files of the Pilsen tumour registry comprising over 20,000 cases of renal tumours.

RESULTS

All patients were men, mean age 56 years (range 29-70). Features on computed tomography (CT) were in two cases Bosniak III, one IV and two were solid tumours. In four patients, nephrectomy was performed, and one patient underwent resection. At the time of surgery, two patients had metastases. In one case, both primary tumour and metastases were active on FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/CT. Both patients with metastatic disease were treated with sunitinib with partial response. One patient died 26 months postoperatively and the other patient is alive 5 months after surgery. Three patients with localized tumours are without evidence of disease 31, 28 and 7 months after surgery. In one case, the resected tumour was histologically combined with a papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC).

CONCLUSION

TCRC occurs predominantly in men with a wide age range. TCRC frequently displays a cystic component which may render a radiological classification of Bosniak III or IV. FDG PET/CT is helpful in the detection of metastases. TCRC has definitive malignant potential. Our findings support a possible relationship to PRCC. The tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib may be used a therapeutical agent with partial response and temporary effect.

[Cystic renal neoplasms. New entities and molecular findings]

Renal neoplasms with dominant cysts represent a broad spectrum of known as well as novel renal tumor entities. Established renal tumors with dominant cysts include cystic nephroma, mixed epithelial and stromal tumor, synovial sarcoma and multilocular cystic renal cancer (WHO classification 2004). Novel tumor types have recently been reported, which are also characterized by marked cyst formation. Examples are tubulocystic renal cancer and renal cancer in end-stage renal disease. These tumors are very likely to be included in a future WHO classification due to their characteristic phenotype and molecular features. Cysts and clear cell renal cell carcinoma frequently coexist in the kidneys of patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease. Cysts are also a component of many sporadic clear cell renal cell carcinomas. Multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma is composed almost exclusively of cysts and is regarded as a specific subtype of clear cell renal cancer. Recent molecular findings suggest that clear cell renal cancer may develop via a cyst-dependent mechanism in von Hippel-Lindau syndrome as well as via cyst-independent molecular pathways in sporadic clear cell renal cancer.

Multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma is a subtype of clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma is an uncommon low grade renal cell carcinoma with unique morphologic features. Its cytogenetic characteristics have not been fully investigated. Its relationship to typical clear cell renal cell carcinoma is uncertain. We evaluated 19 cases of multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma diagnosed by strict morphologic criteria using the 2004 WHO classification system. The control group consisted of 19 low grade (Fuhrman grades 1 or 2) clear cell renal cell carcinomas. Chromosome 3p deletion status was determined by dual color interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis. Chromosome 3p deletion was identified in 17 out of 19 (89%) of the clear cell renal cell carcinoma cases and 14 out of 19 (74%) of the multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma cases, respectively. There was no difference in the status of chromosome 3p deletion between clear cell renal cell carcinoma and multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma (P=0.40). These results support the concept that multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma as a subtype of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Cystic renal tumors: new entities and novel concepts

Cystic renal neoplasms and renal epithelial stromal tumors are diagnostically challenging and represent some novel tumor entities. In this article, clinical and pathologic features of established and novel entities are discussed. Predominantly cystic renal tumors include cystic nephroma/mixed epithelial and stromal tumor, synovial sarcoma, and multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma. These entities are own tumor entities of the 2004 WHO classification of renal tumors. Tubulocystic carcinoma and acquired cystic disease-associated renal cell carcinoma are neoplasms with an intrinsically cystic growth pattern. Both tumor types should be included in a future WHO classification as novel entities owing to their characteristic features. Cysts and clear cell renal cell carcinoma frequently coexist within the kidneys of patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease. Sporadic clear cell renal cell carcinomas often contain cysts, usually as a minor component. Some clear cell renal cell carcinomas have prominent cysts, and multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma is composed almost exclusively of cysts. Recent molecular findings suggest that clear cell renal cancer may develop through cyst-dependent and cyst-independent molecular pathways.

Comparison of gene expression profiles in tubulocystic carcinoma and collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney

The relationship between tubulocystic carcinoma and collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney remains controversial. Some experts are of the opinion that the tumors are related, considering tubulocystic carcinoma to be synonymous with low-grade collecting duct carcinoma. However, others maintain that the 2 are distinct, unrelated entities on the basis of morphologic features and clinical outcome. To explore the relationship between tubulocystic carcinoma and collecting duct carcinoma, we compared the expression of several gene products at the mRNA level in cohorts of each tumor subtype. Seven cases of tubulocystic carcinoma and 8 cases of collecting duct carcinoma were identified. Total RNA was isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue from each case. Relative expression levels of vimentin, alpha methylacyl CoA racemase, E-cadherin, p53, CD10 antigen, parvalbumin, cytokeratin 7, and cytokeratin 19 were assessed by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Tubulocystic carcinoma was characterized by relative overexpression of vimentin, p53, and alpha methylacyl CoA racemase, compared with collecting duct carcinoma (P<0.05 for each gene, t test). In general, tubulocystic carcinoma expressed higher levels of E-cadherin and CD10, whereas collecting duct carcinoma expressed higher levels of cytokeratin 19; however, these trends did not reach statistical significance in this study cohort. Tubulocystic carcinoma and collecting duct carcinoma did not express cytokeratin 7 differentially. Case-to-case variability of gene expression limited the effectiveness of any one marker to distinguish the tumor types. Our study demonstrates that tubulocystic carcinoma and collecting duct carcinoma have different expression profiles of selected genes, including vimentin, p53, and alpha methylacyl CoA racemase. Further analysis of additional cases, using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry, will be useful to test the reproducibility of these findings. In addition, larger studies may establish statistical differences in expression of other genes analyzed in this study. Overall, these findings support the view that tubulocystic carcinoma and collecting duct carcinoma should be considered as 2 distinct entities at the molecular level.

Renal tubulocystic carcinoma is closely related to papillary renal cell carcinoma: implications for pathologic classification

Tubulocystic carcinoma of the kidney (TC-RCC) is a rare renal tumor with unique gross and microscopic features unlike other types of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Several recent studies recommend that it should be classified as a distinct RCC subtype. In this study, we provide pathologic and cytogenetic evidence supporting that TC-RCC is closely related to papillary RCC (PRCC). This study included 20 cases of renal tumors that partially or exclusively comprised a TC-RCC component. Pathologic examination documented the gross and microscopic features of TC-RCC, including multicentricity and the presence of concomitant PRCC and papillary adenoma. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections from 12 TC-RCC and 20 PRCC were subjected to a multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization assay containing probes for chromosomes 7, 17, and Y. One hundred nuclei were examined to enumerate the copy numbers of chromosomes in each tumor and its corresponding normal kidney tissue. A tumor with a percentage of cells harboring a chromosomal change > or = mean+3 SD of normal tissue was considered to harbor that chromosomal change, and a tumor with a percentage of cells with null Y chromosome count (loss of Y chromosome) > or = mean+3 SD of normal tissue was considered to harbor Y chromosome loss. Four of the 20 TC-RCCs were multicentric. Ten had associated PRCC or papillary adenoma within the same kidney as the TC-RCC. In 4 cases, the tubulocystic and papillary components were admixed together within the same lesion. The tumor cells lining both the tubulocystic and papillary components had similar cytologic features. Ten of 12 TC-RCCs had a chromosome 7 gain, 8 of 12 cases had a chromosome 17 gain, and 8 of 9 cases had a loss of Y chromosome. Six of 9 cases with all 3 chromosomes studied had a gain of chromosomes 7 and 17 and a loss of Y chromosome. Our study shows that TC-RCCs and PRCCs are closely related entities. With its distinctive gross and microscopic features, TC-RCC may be considered a unique "morphologic entity." However, before it is accepted as a distinct renal cell carcinoma subtype, further studies are needed to document a characteristic molecular signature associated with this tumor.

Uncommon and recently described renal carcinomas

Major consensus conferences held over a decade ago laid the foundations for the current (2004) WHO classification of renal carcinoma. Clear cell, papillary and chromophobe carcinomas account for 85-90% carcinomas seen in routine practice. The remaining 10-15% of carcinomas consist of rare sporadic and hereditary tumors, some of which had been long recognized, but many of which only emerged as distinct entities in the decade leading up to the WHO publication. Collecting-duct carcinoma is a rare, often lethal form of carcinoma. Medullary carcinoma associated with sickle cell trait, has emerged as a distinctive tumor showing some overlapping features with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Mucinous tubular and spindle-cell carcinoma and tubulocystic carcinoma were earlier considered as patterns of low-grade collecting-duct carcinoma, but are now recognized as separate tumor entities. Carcinomas associated with somatic translocations of TFE3 and TFEB comprise a significant proportion of pediatric renal carcinomas. Oncocytoid renal carcinomas in neuroblastoma survivors was recognized as a unique tumor category in the WHO classification. Renal carcinoma associated with end-stage renal disease is now recognized as having distinct morphological patterns and behavior. In addition there is a group of rare recently described carcinomas, including clear cell papillary carcinoma, oncocytic papillary renal cell carcinoma, follicular renal carcinoma and leiomyomatous renal cell carcinoma. It behooves the surgical pathologist to not only be capable of diagnosing the common forms of renal cancer, but also to be aware of the rare types of renal carcinoma, many of which have emerged in recent years.

Tubulocystic carcinoma of the kidney: a new entity among renal tumors

Tubulocystic carcinoma is a tumor entity, which is not yet included in the WHO-classification of renal tumors. We report a series of 11 cases of this tumor, 6 of which were examined in by immunohistochemistry using a panel of five antibodies (CK7, CK34betaE12, CK19, CD10 and P504S). All patients were men. Each had renal tumor stage of pT1N0M0, with a diameter of 1.7 to 7 cm (mean, 3.3 cm). None of the patients presented with recurrence or metastases. Grossly, tumors were microcystic masses with a bubble-wrap appearance. Histological features included cysts and small tubules, separated by delicate septa and lined by flat to columnar or hobnail cells. The cyst and tubule epithelium showed immunohistochemical characteristics of both proximal and distal tubules. Tubulocystic carcinoma is a distinctive kidney tumor, with noteworthy macroscopic and microscopic characteristics, which can be distinguished from other cystic kidney tumors, including cystic nephroma, multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma and some solid tumors with extensive cystic changes. More cases are needed to ascertain its prognosis. Tubulocystic carcinoma should be considered as a new subtype of renal cell carcinoma in the next revision of the WHO classification.