County-Level Social Vulnerability is Associated with Worse Surgical Outcomes Especially Among Minority Patients

Patients From Medically Underserved Areas Are at Increased Risk for Nonhome Discharge and Emergency Department Return After Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Maryland Health Enterprise Zones (MHEZs) were introduced in 2012 and encompass underserved areas and those with reduced access to healthcare providers. Across the United States many underserved and minority populations experience poorer total joint arthroplasty (TJA) outcomes seemingly because they reside in underserved areas. The purpose of this study is to identify and quantify the relationship between living in an MHEZ and TJA outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 11,451 patients undergoing primary TJA at a single institution from July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2020 was conducted. Patients were classified based on whether they resided in an MHEZ. Statistical analyses were used to compare outcomes for TJA patients who live in MHEZ and those who do not.

RESULTS

Of the 11,451 patients, 1057 patients lived in MHEZ and 10,394 patients did not. After risk adjustment, patients who live in an MHEZ were more likely to return to the emergency department within 90 days postoperatively and were less likely to be discharged home than those patients who do not live in an MHEZ.

CONCLUSION

Total joint arthroplasty patients residing in MHEZ appear to present with poorer overall health as measured by increased American Society of Anesthesiologists and Hierarchical Condition Categories scores, and they are less likely to be discharged home and more likely to return to the emergency department within 90 days. Several factors associated with these findings such as socioeconomic factors, household composition, housing type, disability, and transportation may be modifiable and should be targets of future population health initiatives.

The Influence of Social Determinants of Health on the Provision of Postpartum Contraceptives in Medicaid

Disparities continue to exist in the timely provision of postpartum contraception. This study aimed to identify prevalence and factors associated with postpartum contraception provision among women enrolled in Medicaid. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the 2014 National Medicaid data, linked to county-level social vulnerability index (SVI) data. Women aged 15–44 with a live birth in 2014 were included. Multivariable logistic regression was used to predict 3-day provision of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) and 60-day provision of most effective or moderately effective contraceptives (MMEC). Overall, 3-day LARC provision was 0.2% while 60-day MMEC was 36.3%. Significantly lower odds of receiving MMEC was found among women aged 15–20 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.87; 95% CI:0.86–0.89) compared to women 20–44 years as well as among Asian women (aOR = 0.69; 95% CI:0.66–0.72) and Hispanic women (aOR = 0.73; 95% CI:0.72–0.75) compared to White women. The provision of postpartum contraception remains low, generally, and needs attention in communities experiencing poor maternal outcomes.

Racial Disparities in Surgery for Malignant Bowel Obstruction

BACKGROUND

Operative management of patients with malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) may provide effective palliation, but is associated with substantial risks. This study aimed to analyze racial and ethnic differences in surgical outcomes for patients with MBO.

METHODS

This retrospective study, using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) registry data from 2010 to 2019, compared differences in outcomes by race and ethnicity for 2762 patients undergoing surgery for MBO. Multivariable logistic regression controlled for relevant covariates.

RESULTS

Black patients (n = 407) had higher rates of preoperative comorbidity and were more likely than White patients (n = 2081) to have major complications (28.5% vs 21.8%; p = 0.0031), overall complications (47.4% vs 40.4%; p = 0.0087), a longer median hospital stay (12 days; interquartile range [IQR, 8-19 days] vs 10 days [IQR, 7-17 days]; p = 0.0007), and unplanned readmission (17.1% vs 12.9%; p = 0.0266). Black patients had a similar mortality rate to that of White patients and were less frequently discharged to home (67.6% vs 73.0%; p = 0.0315). Differences in morbidity between Black patients and White patients persisted after controlling for potentially confounding variables. Hispanic patients had lower mortality than White patients (6.3% vs 13.1%; p = 0.0130) and a longer hospital stay (12 days [IQR, 8-18 days] vs 10 days [IQR, 7-17 days]; p = 0.0313). Outcomes did not differ between Asian patients and White patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated significant disparities for Black patients undergoing surgery for MBO. Understanding and addressing what drives these differences, including systemic inequalities such as access to care and racial biases, is essential to the achievement of more equitable, higher-quality patient care.

Social Vulnerability Subtheme Analysis Improves Perioperative Risk Stratification in Hepatopancreatic Surgery

BACKGROUND

There has been increased interest in understanding how social determinants of health (SDH) may affect care both in the medical and surgical setting. We sought to define the impact of various aspects of social vulnerability on the ability of patients to achieve a "textbook outcome" (TO) following hepatopancreatic surgery.

METHODS

Medicare beneficiaries who underwent hepatopancreatic resection between 2013 and 2017 were identified using the Medicare database. Social vulnerability was defined using the Centers for Disease Control Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), which is comprised of four subthemes: socioeconomic (SE), household composition and disability (HCD), minority status and language (MSL), and housing type and transportation (HTT). TO was defined as the composite endpoint: absence of 90-day mortality or readmission, absence of an extended length of stay (LOS), and no complications during the index admission. Cluster analysis was used to identify vulnerability cohorts, and multivariable logistic regression was utilized to assess the impact of these SVI subthemes on the likelihood to achieve a textbook outcome.

RESULTS

Among 37,707 Medicare beneficiaries, 64.9% (n = 24,462) of patients underwent pancreatic resection while 35.1% (n = 13,245) underwent hepatic resection. Median patient age was 72 years (IQR: 68-77), just over one-half were male (51.9%; n = 19,558), and the median CCI was 3 (IQR: 2-8). Cluster analysis revealed five distinct SVI profiles with wide variability in the distribution of SVI subthemes, ranging from 15 (profile 1 IQR: 7-26) to 83 (profile 5 IQR: 66-93). The five profiles were grouped into 3 categories based on median composite SVI: "low vulnerability" (profile 1), "average vulnerability" (profiles 2 and 3), or "high vulnerability" (profiles 4 and 5). The rate of TO ranged from 44.6% in profile 5 (n = 4022) to 49.2% in profile 1 (n = 4836). Multivariable analyses comparing patients categorized into the two average SVI profiles revealed that despite having similar composite SVI scores, the risk of adverse postoperative outcomes was not similar. Specifically, patients from profile 5 had lower odds of achieving a TO (OR 0.89, 95%CI: 0.83-0.95) and higher odds of 90-day mortality (OR 1.29, 95%CI: 1.15-1.44) versus patients in profile 4.

CONCLUSION

Distinct profiles of SVI subtheme characteristics were independently associated with postoperative outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing HP surgery, even among patients with similar overall composite SVI scores.

Impact of hospital quality on surgical outcomes in patients with high social vulnerability: Association of textbook outcomes and social vulnerability by hospital quality

BACKGROUND

We sought to define the impact of high- versus low-quality hospitals on the risk of adverse outcomes among patients undergoing hepatopancreatic surgery relative to social vulnerability. Social vulnerability is an important factor associated with risk of adverse postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

Patients from 2013 to 2017 were identified from the Medicare Inpatient Standard Analytic File. Hospital quality was determined by calculating risk-adjusted probability to achieve a textbook outcome. The Social Vulnerability Index was used to categorize patients. Risk-adjusted probability of mortality, morbidity, and textbook outcome was examined across varying social vulnerability indices stratified by low-, average-, and high-quality hospitals.

RESULTS

Among 27,000 patients who underwent a pancreatectomy (67%) or hepatectomy (33%%), median patient age was 72 years, 48% were female, and 89% were White; mean Social Vulnerability Index was 49. Risk-adjusted 90-day mortality (odds ratio: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.20-1.59, P = .004) and postoperative complications (odds ratio: 1.12, 95% confidence interval: 1.00-1.24, P = .044) were both higher among beneficiaries from the highest social vulnerability counties versus the lowest counties. At low-quality hospitals, patients from the highest vulnerability counties had 70% higher odds of mortality (odds ratio: 1.70, 95% confidence interval: 1.16-2.48, P = .007), 31% higher odds of overall morbidity odds ratio: 1.31, 95% confidence interval: 1.05-2.63, P = .013), and 19% lower odds of achieving a textbook outcome (odds ratio: 0.81, 95% confidence interval: 0.66-0.99, P = .035)-all of which were markedly worse compared with outcomes achieved at high-quality hospitals.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with increased social vulnerability, outcomes were considerably better at high-quality hospitals. Referral of socially vulnerable patients to high-quality hospitals represents an important opportunity to ensure optimal outcomes after complex surgery.

Social vulnerability and fragmentation of postoperative surgical care among patients undergoing hepatopancreatic surgery

BACKGROUND

Regionalization of hepatopancreatic surgery to high-volume hospitals has been associated with fragmentation of postoperative care and, in turn, inferior outcomes after surgery. The objective of this study was to examine the association of social vulnerability with the likelihood of experiencing fragmentation of postoperative care (FPC) after hepatopancreatic surgery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent hepatopancreatic surgery and had at least 1 readmission within 90 days were identified using Medicare 100% Standard Analytical Files between 2013 and 2017. Fragmentation of postoperative care was defined as readmission at a hospital other than the index institution where the initial surgery was performed. The association of social vulnerability index and its components with fragmentation of postoperative care was examined.

RESULTS

Among 11,142 patients, 8,053 (72.3%) underwent pancreatectomy, and 3,089 (27.7%) underwent hepatectomy. The overall incidence of fragmentation of postoperative care was 32.9% (n = 3,667). Patients who experienced fragmentation of postoperative care were older (73 years [interquartile range: 69-77]_FPC vs 72 years [interquartile range: 68-77]_non-FPC) and had a higher Charlson comorbidity score (4 [interquartile range: 2-8]_FPC vs 3 [interquartile range: 2-8]_non-FPC) (both P < .001). Median overall social vulnerability index was higher among patients who experienced fragmentation of postoperative care (52.5 [interquartile range: 29.3-70.4]_FPC vs 51.3 [interquartile range: 27.9-69.4]_non-FPC, P = .02). On multivariable analysis, the odds of experiencing fragmentation of postoperative care was higher with increasing overall social vulnerability index (odds ratio: 1.14; 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.30). Additionally, the odds of experiencing fragmentation of postoperative care were higher among patients with high vulnerability owing to their socioeconomic status (odds ratio: 1.28; 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.45) or their household composition and disability (odds ratio: 1.35; 95% confidence interval 1.19-1.54), whereas high vulnerability owing to minority status and language was inversely associated with fragmentation of postoperative care (odds ratio: 0.73; 95% confidence interval 0.64-0.84).

CONCLUSION

Social vulnerability was strongly associated with the odds of experiencing fragmented postoperative care after hepatopancreatic surgery.

When more is less: Urban disparities in access to surgical care by transportation means

BACKGROUND

Structural factors limiting access to surgical care require elucidation. We hypothesize transportation time to hospitals with surgical capacity disproportionately burdens minority populations.

METHODS

We identified hospitals with surgical capacity within a 20-mile radius of our city center. Using geocoding, we estimated travel times from each census tract to the nearest facility by car or public bus.

RESULTS

For 143 tracts within the county, drive time was 13 ± 4 min and bus time was 33 ± 15 min. Only 41.2% of the population had a facility within 30 min by bus; access was further diminished for those with minority race/ethnicity and/or no insurance. Bus time was associated with percent minority population in a census tract: for each 10% increase in minority population there was a 4.3-min increase in bus time (p < 0.001) when controlling for socioeconomic status and other characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Geographic information systems analysis has potential to identify communities with disproportionate burden to access surgical services.

Intersection of social vulnerability and residential diversity: Postoperative outcomes following resection of lung and colon cancer

INTRODUCTION

While the impact of demographic factors on postoperative outcomes has been examined, little is known about the intersection between social vulnerability and residential diversity on postoperative outcomes following cancer surgery.

METHODS

Individuals who underwent a lung or colon resection for cancer were identified in the 2016-2017 Medicare database. Data were merged with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention social vulnerability index and a residential diversity index was calculated. Logistic regression models were utilized to estimate the probability of postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 55 742 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent lung (39.4%) or colon (60.6%) resection, most were male (46.6%), White (90.2%) and had a mean age of 75.3 years. After adjustment for competing risk factors, both social vulnerability and residential diversity were associated with mortality and other postoperative outcomes. In assessing the intersection of social vulnerability and residential diversity, synergistic effects were noted as patients from counties with low social vulnerability and high residential diversity had the lowest probability of 30-day mortality (3.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.0-3.5) while patients from counties with high social vulnerability and low diversity had a higher probability of 30-day postoperative death (5.2%, 95% CI: 4.6-5.8; odds ratio: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.03).

CONCLUSION

Social vulnerability and residential diversity were independently associated with postoperative outcomes. The intersection of these two social health determinants demonstrated a synergistic effect on the risk of adverse outcomes following lung and colon cancer surgery.

Virtual visits among gynecologic oncology patients during the COVID-19 pandemic are accessible across the social vulnerability spectrum

OBJECTIVE

The COVID-19 pandemic has quickly transformed healthcare systems with expansion of telemedicine. The past year has highlighted risks to immunosuppressed cancer patients and shown the need for health equity among vulnerable groups. In this study, we describe the utilization of virtual visits by patients with gynecologic malignancies and assess their social vulnerability.

METHODS

Virtual visit data of 270 gynecology oncology patients at a single institution from March 1, 2020 to August 31, 2020 was obtained by querying a cohort discovery tool. Through geocoding, the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) was utilized to assign social vulnerability indices to each patient and the results were analyzed for trends and statistical significance.

RESULTS

African American patients were the most vulnerable with a median SVI of 0.71, Asian 0.60, Hispanic 0.41, and Caucasian 0.21. Eighty-seven percent of patients in this study were Caucasian, 8.9% African American, 3.3% Hispanic, and 1.1% Asian, which is comparable to the baseline institutional gynecologic cancer population. The mean census tract SVI variable when comparing patients to all census tracts in the United States was 0.31 (range 0.00 least vulnerable to 0.98 most vulnerable).

CONCLUSIONS

Virtual visits were utilized by patients of all ages and gynecologic cancer types. African Americans were the most socially vulnerable patients of the cohort. Telemedicine is a useful platform for cancer care across the social vulnerability spectrum during the pandemic and beyond. To ensure continued access, further research and outreach efforts are needed.

Profiles in social vulnerability: The association of social determinants of health with postoperative surgical outcomes

BACKGROUND

The association of different social vulnerability subthemes (ie, socioeconomic status, household composition and disability, minority status and language, and housing and transportation) with surgical outcomes remains poorly defined. The current study aimed to identify distinct profiles of social vulnerability among Medicare beneficiaries and define the association of these profiles with postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

The Medicare 100% Standard Analytic Files were used to identify patients undergoing lung resection, coronary artery bypass grafting, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, and colectomy between 2013 and 2017. A cluster analysis was performed based on ranked scores across the 4 subthemes of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention social vulnerability index. The likelihood of complications, extended length of stay, readmission, and mortality were assessed relative to cluster vulnerability profiles.

RESULTS

Among 852,449 Medicare beneficiaries undergoing surgery, median social vulnerability index among patients in the cohort was 49 (interquartile range: 24-74); cluster analysis revealed 5 vulnerability profiles that had heterogeneity in the vulnerability subthemes, even among patients with similar overall social vulnerability index scores. Postoperative outcomes differed across the 5 vulnerability profiles, with patients in the profiles characterized by higher overall vulnerability having worse postoperative outcomes. In particular, risk of complications (profile 1, 31.9% vs profile 5, 34.0%), extended length of stay (profile 1, 21.7% vs profile 5, 24.3%), 30-day readmission (profile 1, 12.6% vs profile 5, 13.2%), and 30-day mortality (profile 1, 4.0% vs profile 5, 4.7%) was greater among patients with the highest vulnerability (all P < .01). Of note, surgical outcomes varied among patients who resided in communities with similar average social vulnerability index scores (social vulnerability index 49-54). In particular, patients in social vulnerability profile 4 had 26% increased odds of 30-day mortality compared to social vulnerability profile 2 patients (odds ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.21-1.30). Additionally, profile 3 patients had 15% higher odds of 30-day mortality versus profile 2 patients (odds ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.10-1.20).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative outcomes differed across patients based on cluster vulnerability profiles. Despite similar overall aggregate social vulnerability index scores, cluster analysis was able to discriminate various social determinants of health subthemes among patients who resided in "average" vulnerability communities that stratified patients relative to risk of adverse postoperative events.

Patient Social Vulnerability and Hospital Community Racial/Ethnic Integration: Do All Patients Undergoing Pancreatectomy Receive the Same Care Across Hospitals?

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the current study was to characterize the role of patient social vulnerability relative to hospital racial/ethnic integration on postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing pancreatectomy.

BACKGROUND

The interplay between patient- and community-level factors on outcomes after complex surgery has not been well-examined.

METHODS

Medicare beneficiaries who underwent a pancreatectomy between 2013 and 2017 were identified utilizing 100% Medicare inpatient files. P-SVI was determined using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria, whereas H-REI was estimated using Shannon Diversity Index. Impact of P-SVI and H-REI on "TO" [ie, no surgical complication/extended length-of-stay (LOS)/90-day mortality/90-day readmission] was assessed.

RESULTS

Among 24,500 beneficiaries who underwent pancreatectomy, 12,890 (52.6%) were male and median age was 72 years (Interquartile range: 68-77); 10,619 (43.3%) patients achieved a TO. The most common adverse postoperative outcome was 90-day readmission (n = 8,066, 32.9%), whereas the least common was 90-day mortality (n = 2282, 9.3%). Complications and extended LOS occurred in 30.4% (n = 7450) and 23.3% (n = 5699) of the cohort, respectively. Patients from an above average SVI county who underwent surgery at a below average REI hospital had 18% lower odds [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74-0.95] of achieving a TO compared with patients from a below average SVI county who underwent surgery at a hospital with above average REI. Of note, patients from the highest SVI areas who underwent pancreatectomy at hospitals with the lowest REI had 30% lower odds (95% CI: 0.54-0.91) of achieving a TO compared with patients from very low SVI areas who underwent surgery at a hospital with high REI. Further comparisons of these 2 patient groups indicated 76% increased odds of 90-day mortality (95% CI: 1.10-2.82) and 50% increased odds of an extended LOS (95% CI: 1.07-2.11).

CONCLUSION

Patients with high social vulnerability who underwent pancreatectomy in hospitals located in communities with low racial/ethnic integration had the lowest chance to achieve an "optimal" TO. A focus on both patient- and community-level factors is needed to ensure optimal and equitable patient outcomes.

Making it Complicated: Does Disparity in Access to Care Lead to More Perforated Appendicitis?

INTRODUCTION

Delays in obtaining care may lead to perforated appendicitis, increasing risk of morbidity and mortality. We previously explored the role of social determinants in patients undergoing cholecystectomy, finding that emergent presentation is associated with neighborhood Social Vulnerability Index (SVI). We hypothesize that social vulnerability is associated with increased incidence of perforated appendicitis.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients presenting to our urban, academic hospital with acute appendicitis during a 9-month timeframe (11/2019 - 7/2020). Patients were classified as perforated or non-perforated. Patient SVI was determined using geocoding at the census tract level. Because rates of perforation were higher in older patients, we performed a subset analysis of patients ≥ 40 years.

RESULTS

190 patients were included. Patients with perforated appendicitis (n = 48, 25%) were older and were more likely to present to a clinic versus the emergency department (P = 0.009). Perforated patients had longer delay before seeking care (56% versus 6% with > 72 hours of symptoms, P < 0.001). However, there were no differences between groups in terms of sex, race/ethnicity, insurance type, language barrier, having a primary care physician, or any of the SVI subscales. Of patients ≥ 40 years, a higher proportion were perforated (28/80, 35%) despite similar rates of delayed care. In this cohort, higher overall SVI as well as the socioeconomic status and household composition/disability subscales were associated with perforation.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to our hypothesis, while perforation was associated with delayed care in this population, we did not find overall that social vulnerability or individual social determinants accounted for this delay.

The impact of social vulnerability subthemes on postoperative outcomes differs by racial/ethnic minority status

INTRODUCTION

Social vulnerability is an important driver of disparate surgical outcomes, however the extent to which certain types of vulnerability impact outcomes is poorly understood.

METHODS

Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older who underwent one of four operations were identified. Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression was used to measure the association of four social vulnerability subthemes from the social vulnerability index (SVI) were assessed relative to the likelihood to achieve a textbook outcome (TO).

RESULTS

Among 579,846 Medicare beneficiaries, median age was 74 years and most patients (536,455,92.5%) were White/non-Hispanic. On multivariable analysis, the overall impact of the composite SVI metric on the odds to achieve a postoperative TO was lower among White/non-Hispanic patients (Δ25%ile SVI:OR:0.98,95%CI:0.97-0.98) compared with ethnic/minority patients (Δ25%ile SVI:OR:0.93,95%CI:0.91-0.94). Increasing vulnerability in the subthemes of socioeconomic status (Δ25%ile SVI:ethnic/minority:OR:0.92, 95%CI:0.91-0.94) and household composition (Δ25%ile SVI:ethnic/minority:OR:0.92,95%CI:0.91-0.94) was associated with a greater likelihood not to achieve a TO among minority patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Worsening SES and household compositions & disability had a detrimental effect on odds of TO following surgery with the most pronounced effect on non-White minority patients.

Impact of Race/Ethnicity and County-Level Vulnerability on Receipt of Surgery Among Older Medicare Beneficiaries With the Diagnosis of Early Pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients can experience barriers and disparities to access high-quality cancer care. This study sought to characterize receipt of surgery and chemotherapy among Medicare beneficiaries with a diagnosis of early-stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma cancer (PDAC) relative to race/ethnicity and social vulnerability.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database was used to identify patients with a diagnosis of early-stage (stage 1 or 2) PDAC between 2004 and 2016. Data were merged with the CDC's Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) at the beneficiary's county of residence. Multivariable, mixed-effects logistic regression was used to assess the association of SVI with resection.

RESULTS

Among 15,931 older Medicare beneficiaries with early-stage PDAC (median age, 77 years; interquartile range [IQR], 71-82 years), the majority was White (n = 12,737, 80.0 %), whereas a smaller subset was Black or Latino (n = 3194, 20.0 %) A minority of patients was more likely to live in highly vulnerable communities (low SVI: white [90.5 %] vs minority [9.5 %] vs high SVI: white [71.9 %] vs minority [28.1 %]; p < 0.001). Use of resection for early-stage PDAC was lowest among the patients who resided in high-SVI areas (low [38.0 %] vs average [34.3 %] vs high [31.9 %]; p < 0.001). The minority patients were less likely to undergo resection than the White patients (no resection: white [64.1 %] vs minority [70.7 %]; p < 0.001). The median SVI was higher among the patients who underwent resection (57.6; IQR, 36.0-81.0) than among those who did not (60.4; IQR, 41.9-84.3), and increased SVI resulted in a decline in the likelihood of resection (SVI trend: OR, 0.98; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.97-1.00), especially among the minority patients. Minority patients from high-SVI counties had markedly lower odds of preoperative chemotherapy than minority patients from a low-SVI neighborhood (OR, 0.62; 95 % CI, 0.52-0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Older Medicare beneficiaries with early-stage PDAC residing in counties with higher social vulnerability had lower odds of undergoing pancreatic resection, which was more pronounced among minority versus older White Medicare beneficiaries.

Association of social vulnerability with the use of high-volume and Magnet recognition hospitals for hepatopancreatic cancer surgery

BACKGROUND

In an effort to improve perioperative and oncologic outcomes, there have been multiple quality improvement initiatives, including regionalization of high-risk procedures and hospital accreditation designations from independent organizations. These initiatives may, however, hinder access to high-quality surgical care for certain patients living in areas with high social vulnerability who may be disproportionally affected, leading to disparities in access and worse postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

Medicare beneficiaries who underwent liver or pancreas resection for cancer were identified using the 100% Medicare Inpatient Standard Analytic Files. Hospitals were designated as high-volume based on Leapfrog criteria. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's social vulnerability index database was used to abstract social vulnerability index information based on each beneficiary's county of residence at the time of operation. The probability that a patient received care at a high-volume hospital stratified by the social vulnerability of the patient's county of residence was examined. Risk-adjusted postoperative outcomes were compared across low, average, and high levels of vulnerability at both low- and high-volume hospitals.

RESULTS

Among 16,978 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent a pancreatectomy (n = 13,393, 78%) or a liver resection (n = 3,594, 21.2%) for cancer, the mean age was 73.3 years (standard deviation: 5.8), nearly half the cohort was female (n = 7,819, 46%), and the overwhelming majority were White (n = 15,034, 88.5%). Mean social vulnerability index was 49.8 (standard deviation 24.8) and mean Charlson comorbidity index was 4.8 (standard deviation: 3). Overall, 8,251 (48.6%) of patients had their operations at a high-volume hospital, and 3,802 patients had their operations at a hospital with Magnet recognition. Age and sex were similar within the low-, average-, and high-social vulnerability index cohorts (P > .05); however, race differed across social vulnerability index groups. White patients made up 93% (n = 3,241) of the low social vulnerability index compared with 83.9% (n = 2,706) of the high-social vulnerability index group, whereas non-Whites made up 7% (n = 244) of the low-social vulnerability index group compared with 16.1% (n = 556) of the high-social vulnerability index group (P < .001). The risk-adjusted overall probability of having surgery at a high-volume hospital decreased as social vulnerability increased (odds ratio: 0.98, 95% confidence interval: 0.97-0.99). Risk-adjusted probability of postoperative complications increased with social vulnerability index; however, among patients with high social vulnerability, risk of postoperative complications was lower at high-volume hospitals compared with low-volume hospitals. In contrast, there was no difference in postoperative complications between hospitals with and without Magnet recognition across social vulnerability index.

CONCLUSION

Patients residing in communities characterized by a high social vulnerability index were less likely to undergo high-risk cancer surgery at a high-volume hospital. Although postoperative complications and mortality increased as social vulnerability index increased, some of the risk appeared to be mitigated by having surgery at a high-volume hospital. These data highlight the importance of access to high-quality surgical care, especially among patients who may already be more vulnerable.

Association of Depression with In-Patient and Post-Discharge Disposition and Expenditures Among Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing Resection for Cancer

BACKGROUND

The impact of depression on utilization of post-discharge care and overall episode of care expenditures remains poorly defined. We sought to define the impact of depression on postoperative outcomes, including discharge disposition, as well as overall expenditures associated with the global episode of surgical care.

METHOD

The Medicare 100% Standard Analytic Files were used to identify patients undergoing resection for esophageal, colon, rectal, pancreatic, and liver cancer between 2013 and 2017. The impact of depression on inpatient outcomes, as well as home health care and skilled nursing facilities utilization and expenditures, was analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 113,263 patients, 14,618 (12.9%) individuals had depression. Patients with depression were more likely to experience postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-1.42), extended length of stay (LOS) (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.36-1.47), readmission within 90 days (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.14-1.25), as well as 90-day mortality (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.27-1.42) (all p < 0.05). In turn, the proportion of patients who achieved a textbook outcome following cancer surgery was lower among patients with depression (no depression: 53.3% vs. depression: 45.3%; OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.68-0.73). Patients with a preexisting diagnosis of depression had higher odds of additional post-discharge expenditures compared with individuals without a diagnosis of depression (OR 1.42; 95% CI 1.35-1.50); patients with a preexisting diagnosis of depression ($10,500, IQR $3,200-$22,500) had higher median post-discharge expenditures versus patients without depression ($6600, IQR $2100-$17,400) (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, after controlling for other factors, depression remained associated with a 19.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 15.7-22.3%) increase in post-discharge expenditures.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with depression undergoing resection for cancer had worse in-patient outcomes and were less likely to achieve a TO. Patients with depression were more likely to require post-discharge care and had higher post-discharge expenditures.

Postoperative imaging surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma: How much is enough?

BACKGROUND

The objective of the current study was to define trends in postoperative surveillance imaging following liver-directed treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and characterize the impact of high-intensity surveillance on long-term survival.

METHODS

Patients who underwent liver- directed therapy for HCC between 2004 and 2016 were identified using the SEER-Medicare database. Trends in surveillance intensity over time, factors associated with high surveillance intensity and the impact of surveillance on long-term outcomes were examined.

RESULTS

Utilization of high-intensity surveillance abdominal imaging (≥6 scans over 2 years) following liver-directed therapy of HCC decreased over time (2004-2007: n = 130, 36.1% vs. 2008-2011: n = 181, 29.5% vs. 2012-2016: n = 111, 24.5%; p_trend  < 0.001). History of chronic viral hepatitis (hepatitis B: odds ratio [OR], 1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-3.43; hepatitis C: OR, 1.79; 95% CI: 1.32-2.43), presence of regional (vs. local-only) disease (OR, 1.47; 95% CI: 1.09-1.98) and receipt of transplantation (OR, 2.23; 95% CI: 1.57-3.17) were associated with higher odds of high intensity surveillance. Intensity of surveillance imaging was not associated with long-term survival (5-year overall survival: low-intensity, 48.1% vs. high-intensity, 48.9%; hazards ratio, 0.94; 95% CI: 0.78-1.13).

CONCLUSION

Utilization of posttreatment surveillance imaging decreased over time following liver-directed therapy for HCC. While utilization of high-intensity screening varied by HCC procedure performed, intensity of surveillance had no effect on survival.