Specific regulation of Xenopus chromosomal 5S rRNA gene transcription in vivo by histone H1

Overproduction of histone H1 variants in vivo increases basal and induced activity of the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter

BALB/c 3T3 cell lines containing integrated copies of the MMTV promoter driving a reporter gene were constructed. Expression vectors in which either of two H1 variants, H10 or H1c, were under control of an inducible promoter were introduced into these lines. Surprisingly, overproduction of either variant resulted in a dramatic increase in basal and hormone-induced expression from the MMTV promoter. H1 overproduction also slowed the loss of MMTV promoter activity associated with prolonged hormone treatment. Transiently transfected MMTV reporter genes, which do not adopt a phased nucleosomal arrangement, do not display increased activity upon H1 overproduction. Thus the effects observed for stable constructs most likely represents a direct effect of H1 on a chromatin-mediated process specific to the nucleosomal structure of the integrated constructs. Induction of increased levels of acetylated core histones by treatment with trichostatin A also potentiated MMTV activity and this effect was additive to that caused by H1 overproduction. However, the effects of TSA treatment, in control or H1-overproducing cells, were eliminated by inhibiting protein synthesis. TSA treatment does not necessarily potentiate MMTV promoter activity by increasing core histone acetylation within the MMTV promoter but perhaps by altering the synthesis of an unlinked transcriptional regulator.

Transcriptional repression by XPc1, a new Polycomb homolog in Xenopus laevis embryos, is independent of histone deacetylase

The Polycomb group (Pc-G) genes encode proteins that assemble into complexes implicated in the epigenetic maintenance of heritable patterns of expression of developmental genes, a function largely conserved from Drosophila to mammals and plants. The Pc-G is thought to act at the chromatin level to silence expression of target genes; however, little is known about the molecular basis of this repression. In keeping with the evidence that Pc-G homologs in higher vertebrates exist in related pairs, we report here the isolation of XPc1, a second Polycomb homolog in Xenopus laevis. We show that XPc1 message is maternally deposited in a translationally masked form in Xenopus oocytes, with XPc1 protein first appearing in embryonic nuclei shortly after the blastula stage. XPc1 acts as a transcriptional repressor in vivo when tethered to a promoter in Xenopus embryos. We find that XPc1-mediated repression can be only partially alleviated by an increase in transcription factor dosage and that inhibition of deacetylase activity by trichostatin A treatment has no effect on XPc1 repression, suggesting that histone deacetylation does not form the basis for Pc-G-mediated repression in our assay.

Identification and mutation of phosphorylation sites in a linker histone. Phosphorylation of macronuclear H1 is not essential for viability in tetrahymena

Linker histone phosphorylation has been suggested to play roles in both chromosome condensation and transcriptional regulation. In the ciliated protozoan Tetrahymena, in contrast to many eukaryotes, histone H1 of macronuclei is highly phosphorylated during interphase. Macronuclei divide amitotically without overt chromosome condensation in this organism, suggesting that requirements for phosphorylation of macronuclear H1 may be limited to transcriptional regulation. Here we report the major sites of phosphorylation of macronuclear H1 in Tetrahymena thermophila. Five phosphorylation sites, present in a single cluster, were identified by sequencing 32P-labeled peptides isolated from tryptic peptide maps. Phosphothreonine was detected within two TPVK motifs and one TPTK motif that resemble established p34(cdc2) kinase consensus sequences. Phosphoserine was detected at two non-proline-directed sites that do not resemble known kinase consensus sequences. Phosphorylation at the two noncanonical sites appears to be hierarchical because it was observed only when a nearby p34(cdc2) site was also phosphorylated. Cells expressing macronuclear H1 containing alanine substitutions at all five of these phosphorylation sites were viable even though macronuclear H1 phosphorylation was abolished. These data suggest that the five sites identified comprise the entire collection of sites utilized by Tetrahymena and demonstrate that phosphorylation of macronuclear H1, like the protein itself, is not essential for viability in Tetrahymena.

How do linker histones mediate differential gene expression?

In developing Xenopus laevis embryos the multiple-copy oocyte-type 5S RNA genes are progressively shut down. Results presented in three recent articles 1-3 together demonstrate that replacement of the cleavage stage linker histone B4 by somatic H1 leads to chromatosomes positioned directly over these genes and adjacent sequences so as to occlude the binding site for the critical transcription factor TFIIIA. In contrast, on the somatic-type 5S genes the somatic H1 positions chromatosomes about 65 bp further upstream, thereby leaving the TFIIIA binding site exposed and the genes active. The somatic linker histone thus functions as a specific gene repressor.

Developmental competence of the gut endoderm: genetic potentiation by GATA and HNF3/fork head proteins

A long-standing problem in developmental biology has been to understand how the embryonic germ layers gain the competence to differentiate into distinct cell types. Genetic studies have shown that members of the GATA and HNF3/fork head transcription factor families are essential for the formation and differentiation of gut endoderm tissues in worms, flies, and mammals. Recent in vivo footprinting studies have shown that GATA and HNF3 binding sites in chromatin are occupied on a silent gene in endoderm that has the potential to be activated solely in that germ layer. These and other data indicate that these evolutionarily conserved factors help impart the competence of a gene to be activated in development, a phenomenon called genetic potentiation. The mechanistic implications of genetic potentiation and its general significance are discussed.

Specific binding of high-mobility-group I (HMGI) protein and histone H1 to the upstream AT-rich region of the murine beta interferon promoter: HMGI protein acts as a potential antirepressor of the promoter

The high-mobility-group I (HMGI) protein is a nonhistone component of active chromatin. In this work, we demonstrate that HMGI protein specifically binds to the AT-rich region of the murine beta interferon (IFN-beta) promoter localized upstream of the murine virus-responsive element (VRE). Contrary to what has been described for the human promoter, HMGI protein did not specifically bind to the VRE of the murine IFN-beta promoter. Stably transfected promoters carrying mutations on this HMGI binding site displayed delayed virus-induced kinetics of transcription. When integrated into chromatin, the mutated promoter remained repressed and never reached normal transcriptional activity. Such a phenomenon was not observed with transiently transfected promoters upon which chromatin was only partially reconstituted. Using UV footprinting, we show that the upstream AT-rich sequences of the murine IFN-beta promoter constitute a preferential binding region for histone H1. Transfection with a plasmid carrying scaffold attachment regions as well as incubation with distamycin led to the derepression of the IFN-beta promoter stably integrated into chromatin. In vitro, HMGI protein was able to displace histone H1 from the upstream AT-rich region of the wild-type promoter but not from the promoter carrying mutations on the upstream high-affinity HMGI binding site. Our results suggest that the binding of histone H1 to the upstream AT-rich region of the promoter might be partly responsible for the constitutive repression of the promoter. The displacement by HMGI protein of histone H1 could help to convert the IFN-beta promoter from a repressed to an active state.

Binding of Gal4p and bicoid to nucleosomal sites in yeast in the absence of replication

The yeast transcriptional activator Gal4p can bind to sites in nucleosomal DNA in vivo which it is unable to access in vitro. One event which could allow proteins to bind to otherwise inaccessible sites in chromatin in living cells is DNA replication. To determine whether replication is required for Gal4p to bind to nucleosomal sites in yeast, we have used previously characterized chromatin reporters in which Gal4p binding sites are incorporated into nucleosomes. We find that Gal4p is able to perturb nucleosome positioning via nucleosomal binding sites in yeast arrested either in G1, with alpha-factor, or in G2/M, with nocodazole. Similar results were obtained whether Gal4p synthesis was induced from the endogenous promoter by growth in galactose medium or by an artificial, hormone-inducible system. We also examined binding of the Drosophila transcriptional activator Bicoid, which belongs to the homeodomain class of transcription factors. We show that Bicoid, like Gal4p, can bind to nucleosomal sites in SWI+ and swi1Delta yeast and in the absence of replication. Our results indicate that some feature of the intracellular environment other than DNA replication or the SWI-SNF complex permits factor access to nucleosomal sites.

Hierarchical differentiation of multipotent progenitor cells

Selection of a pathway of differentiation in multipotent progenitor cells may depend on the amount of histone H1 or H1 zero relative to the core histones. With low levels of these linker histones, it is proposed that an evolutionarily more ancient cell differentiation occurs. Greater repetition of AT-rich regulatory motifs allows more frequent, hence earlier, transcription of genes, accounting for this type of cell differentiation. It is further proposed that a decrease of total cell protein accumulation leads to an increase of histone H1 or H1 zero relative to the core histones. It is suggested that these linker histones preferentially bind the more AT-rich regulatory sequences, thereby restricting the phylogenetically more ancient differentiation potency. This allows differentiation of an evolutionarily younger cell type.

Chromatin disruption and modification

Chromatin disruption and modification are associated with transcriptional regulation by diverse coactivators and corepressors. Here we discuss the possible structural basis and functional consequences of the observed alterations in chromatin associated with transcriptional activation and repression. Recent advances in defining the roles of individual histones and their domains in the assembly and maintenance of regulatory architectures provide a framework for understanding how chromatin remodelling machines, histone acetyltransferases and deacetylases function.

Enhancer of RNA polymerase III gene transcription

A protein responsible for enhanced transcription by RNA polymerase III was identified in extracts from Xenopus oocytes. This protein, called EP3, interacts with a specific DNA sequence adjacent to the 3'-end of a Xenopus somatic 5S RNA gene and forms a distinct band shift complex with a unique DNase I footprint. Enhanced transcription was observed from both 5S RNA and tRNA reporter genes when EP3 binding sites were inserted at different locations and orientations. Removal of the EP3 protein from an oocyte extract abolished this enhanced transcription. In addition, EP3 was shown to stimulate transcription by increasing the rate of transcription complex assembly. EP3 directly discriminates between the somatic and oocyte 5S RNA gene families and may play a significant role in their differential expression during early Xenopus development.

Xenopus NF-Y pre-sets chromatin to potentiate p300 and acetylation-responsive transcription from the Xenopus hsp70 promoter in vivo

We identify Xenopus NF-Y as a key regulator of acetylation responsiveness for the Xenopus hsp70 promoter within chromatin assembled in Xenopus oocyte nuclei. Y-box sequences are required for the assembly of DNase I-hypersensitive sites in the hsp70 promoter, and for transcriptional activation both by inhibitors of histone deacetylase and by the p300 acetyltransferase. The viral oncoprotein E1A interferes with both of these activation steps. We clone Xenopus NF-YA, NF-YB and NF-YC and establish that NF-Y is the predominant Y-box-binding protein in Xenopus oocyte nuclei. NF-Y interacts with p300 in vivo and is itself a target for acetylation by p300. Transcription from the hsp70 promoter in chromatin can be enhanced further by heat shock factor. We suggest two steps in chromatin modification at the Xenopus hsp70 promoter: first the binding of NF-Y to the Y-boxes to pre-set chromatin and second the recruitment of p300 to modulate transcriptional activity.

The nucleosome: a powerful regulator of transcription

Nucleosomes provide the architectural framework for transcription. Histones, DNA elements, and transcription factors are organized into precise regulatory complexes. Positioned nucleosomes can facilitate or impede the transcription process. These structures are dynamic, reflecting the capacity of chromatin to adopt different functional states. Histones are mobile with respect to DNA sequence. Individual histone domains are targeted for posttranslational modifications. Histone acetylation promotes transcription factor access to nucleosomal DNA and relieves inhibitory effects on transcriptional initiation and elongation. The nucleosomal infrastructure emerges as powerful contributor to the regulation of gene activity.

Differential nucleosome positioning on Xenopus oocyte and somatic 5 S RNA genes determines both TFIIIA and H1 binding: a mechanism for selective H1 repression

In Xenopus somatic cells histone H1 effects the transcriptional repression of oocyte type 5 S RNA genes, without altering the transcription of the somatic type 5 S RNA genes. Using an unambiguous nucleosome mapping method we find substantial differences between the multiple in vitro nucleosome positions on the two types of genes. These nucleosome positions determine both transcription factor and H1 binding, allowing TFIIIA to bind more efficiently to nucleosomes containing the somatic 5 S RNA gene than to nucleosomes on the oocyte 5 S RNA gene. Significantly, in a binding competition between TFIIIA and H1, TFIIIA preferentially binds to the somatic nucleosome whereas H1 preferentially binds to the oocyte nucleosome, excluding TFIIIA binding. These results strongly suggest that nucleosome positioning plays a key role in the regulation of transcription of 5 S RNA genes and provide a molecular mechanism for the selective repression of the oocyte 5 S RNA genes by H1.

Functionally relevant histone-DNA interactions extend beyond the classically defined nucleosome core region

We demonstrate that core histones can affect the accessibility of a DNA element positioned outside of the classically defined nucleosome core region. The distance between a well positioned nucleosome and the binding site for the 5 S-specific transcription factor TFIIIA was systematically varied and the relative binding affinity for TFIIIA determined. We found that core histone-DNA interactions attenuate the affinity of TFIIIA for its cognate DNA element by a factor of 50-100-fold even when the critical binding region lies well outside of the classically defined nucleosome core region. These results have implications for the validity of parallels drawn between the accessibility of general nucleases to DNA sequences in chromatin and the activity of actual sequence-specific DNA binding factors.

Transcriptionally active Xenopus laevis somatic 5 S ribosomal RNA genes are packaged with hyperacetylated histone H4, whereas transcriptionally silent oocyte genes are not

The relationship between histone acetylation and transcription of the Xenopus laevis oocyte and somatic 5 S ribosomal RNA genes was investigated. Chromatin fragments from a X. laevis kidney cell line were immunoprecipitated with an antibody specific for hyperacetylated histone H4. The DNA from the hyperacetylated chromatin was probed with both oocyte- and somatic gene-specific sequences, and the results showed that the upstream, nontranscribed region of the transcriptionally active somatic genes is packaged with acetylated histone H4. In contrast, the corresponding region of the transcriptionally silent oocyte genes is packaged with hypoacetylated histone H4 in this cells line. Further study also showed that this region of the oocyte genes was less sensitive to digestion with the enzyme, micrococcal nuclease. Together these results suggest that, as described for both RNA polymerase I and II transcribed genes, there is a correlation between histone acetylation and transcription of the RNA polymerase III transcribed 5 S ribosomal RNA genes in X. laevis.

Expression of murine H1 histone genes during postnatal development

Murine genes encoding the seven H1 histone isoforms H1.1-H1.5, H1(o) and H1t have been isolated and sequenced. We have established expression patterns of these genes in several tissues during postnatal development. For that analysis, RNase protection assay rather than Northern blot hybridization was used, since the sequences of these genes are highly similar and would cross-hybridize under Northern blot conditions. Expression patterns of H1.1 to H1.5 and H1(o) were determined in tissues of animals at days 5, 9 and 20 after birth and of adult mice. In addition, RNA was analyzed in three mouse cell lines (NIH3T3, P19, TM4). Transcription of the subtype genes H1.2 and H1.4 was found in all tissues and cell lines studied. The most varied expression patterns were obtained with the H1.1 subtype. H1.1 mRNA was found at high concentrations in thymus and spleen throughout development and in testis beginning with a low expression in 5-day-old animals and increasing levels in testis RNA from 9- and 20-day-old and adult mice. H1(o) mRNA was found primarily in highly differentiated tissues with concentrations decreasing from 5-day-old to adult animals.

Role of histone H1 as an architectural determinant of chromatin structure and as a specific repressor of transcription on Xenopus oocyte 5S rRNA genes

We explore the role of histone H1 as a DNA sequence-dependent architectural determinant of chromatin structure and of transcriptional activity in chromatin. The Xenopus laevis oocyte- and somatic-type 5S rRNA genes are differentially transcribed in embryonic chromosomes in vivo depending on the incorporation of somatic histone H1 into chromatin. We establish that this effect can be reconstructed at the level of a single nucleosome. H1 selectively represses oocyte-type 5S rRNA genes by directing the stable positioning of a nucleosome such that transcription factors cannot bind to the gene. This effect does not occur on the somatic-type genes. Histone H1 binds to the 5' end of the nucleosome core on the somatic 5S rRNA gene, leaving key regulatory elements in the promoter accessible, while histone H1 binds to the 3' end of the nucleosome core on the oocyte 5S rRNA genes, specifically blocking access to a key promoter element (the C box). TFIIIA can bind to the somatic 5S rRNA gene assembled into a nucleosome in the presence of H1. Because H1 binds with equivalent affinities to nucleosomes containing either gene, we establish that it is the sequence-selective assembly of a specific repressive chromatin structure on the oocyte 5S rRNA genes that accounts for differential transcriptional repression. Thus, general components of chromatin can determine the assembly of specific regulatory nucleoprotein complexes.

Prothymosin alpha modulates the interaction of histone H1 with chromatin

Prothymosin alpha (ProTalpha) is an abundant acidic nuclear protein that may be involved in cell proliferation. In our search for its cellular partners, we have recently found that ProTalpha binds to linker histone H1. We now provide further evidence for the physiological relevance of this interaction by immunoisolation of a histone H1-ProTalpha complex from NIH 3T3 cell extracts. A detailed analysis of the interaction between the two proteins suggests contacts between the acidic region of ProTalpha and histone H1. In the context of a physiological chromatin reconstitution reaction, the presence of ProTalpha does not affect incorporation of an amount of histone H1 sufficient to increase the nucleosome repeat length by 20 bp, but prevents association of all further H1. Consistent with this finding, a fraction of histone H1 is released when H1-containing chromatin is challenged with ProTalpha. These results imply at least two different interaction modes of H1 with chromatin, which can be distinguished by their sensitivity to ProTalpha. The properties of ProTalpha suggest a role in fine tuning the stoichiometry and/or mode of interaction of H1 with chromatin.

Structure, dynamics, and function of chromatin in vitro

The substrates for the essential biological processes of transcription, replication, recombination, DNA repair, and cell division are not naked DNA; rather, they are protein-DNA complexes known as chromatin, in one or another stage of a hierarchical series of compactions. These are exciting times for students of chromatin. New studies provide incontrovertible evidence linking chromatin structure to function. Exceptional progress has been made in studies of the structure of chromatin subunits. Surprising new dynamic properties have been discovered. And, much progress has been made in dissecting the functional roles of specific chromatin proteins and domains. This review focuses on in vitro studies of chromatin structure, dynamics, and function.

Linker histones versus HMG1/2: a struggle for dominance?

The linker histones (H1, H1 zero, H5, etc.) and a group of abundant non-histone chromosomal proteins (HMG1/2) bind to linker DNA in chromatin and exhibit both generalized and specific effects on gene transcription. The two classes of proteins share many features of DNA binding behaviour, although they are structurally unrelated. While the linker histones and HMG1/2 exhibit direct competition in binding to such structures as four-way junction DNA, whether they compete for binding to the nucleosome has not been investigated. The possibility for either opposite or synergistic effects on gene regulation must be considered at this point.

DNA methylation, nucleosomes and the inheritance of chromatin structure and function

The replication of the genome during S phase is a crucial period for the establishment and maintenance of programmes of differential gene activity. Existing chromosomal structures are disrupted during replication and reassembled on both daughter chromatids. The capacity to reassemble a particular chromatin structure with defined functional properties reflects the commitment of a cell type to a particular state of determination. The core and linker histones and their modifications, enzymes that modify the histones, DNA methylation and proteins that recognize methylated DNA within chromatin may all play independent or interrelated roles in defining the functional properties of chromatin. Pre-existing protein-DNA interactions and DNA methylation in a parental chromosome will influence the structure and function of daughter chromosomes generating an epigenetic imprint. In this chapter we consider the events occurring at the eukaryotic replication fork, their consequences for pre-existing chromosomal structures and how an epigenetic imprint might be maintained.

Histone H1 reduces the frequency of initiation in Xenopus egg extract by limiting the assembly of prereplication complexes on sperm chromatin

Somatic histone H1 reduces both the rate and extent of DNA replication in Xenopus egg extract. We show here that H1 inhibits replication directly by reducing the number of replication forks, but not the rate of fork progression, in Xenopus sperm nuclei. Density substitution experiments demonstrate that those forks that are active in H1 nuclei elongate to form large tracts of fully replicated DNA, indicating that inhibition is due to a reduction in the frequency of initiation and not the rate or extent of elongation. The observation that H1 dramatically reduces the number of replication foci in sperm nuclei supports this view. The establishment of replication competent DNA in egg extract requires the assembly of prereplication complexes (pre-RCs) on sperm chromatin. H1 reduces binding of the pre-RC proteins, XOrc2, XCdc6, and XMcm3, to chromatin. Replication competence can be restored in these nuclei, however, only under conditions that promote the loss of H1 from chromatin and licensing of the DNA. Thus, H1 inhibits replication in egg extract by preventing the assembly of pre-RCs on sperm chromatin, thereby reducing the frequency of initiation. These data raise the interesting possibility that H1 plays a role in regulating replication origin use during Xenopus development.

The globular domain of histone H1 is sufficient to direct specific gene repression in early Xenopus embryos

One molecule of a linker histone such as histone H1 is incorporated into every metazoan nucleosome [1]. Histone H1 has three distinct structural domains: the positively charged amino-terminal and carboxy-terminal tails are separated by a globular domain that is similar to the winged-helix motif found in sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins [2]. The globular domain interacts with DNA immediately contiguous to that wrapped around the core histones [3,4], whereas the tail domains are important for the compaction of nucleosomal arrays [5]. Experiments in vivo indicate that histone H1 does not function as a global transcriptional repressor, but instead has more specific regulatory roles [6-9]. In Xenopus, maternal stores of the B4 linker histone that are assembled into chromatin during the early cleavage divisions are replaced by somatic histone H1 during gastrulation [10]. This transition in chromatin composition causes the repression of genes encoding oocyte-type 5S rRNAs, and restricts the competence of ectodermal cells to differentiate into mesoderm [6,9-11]. Here, we demonstrate that the globular domain of histone H1 is sufficient for directing gene-specific transcriptional repression and for restricting the mesodermal competence of embryonic ectoderm. We discuss our results in the context of specific structural roles for this domain in the nucleosome.

Prolonged glucocorticoid exposure dephosphorylates histone H1 and inactivates the MMTV promoter

Glucocorticoids rapidly induce transcription from the mouse mammary tumour virus (MMTV) promoter via a glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-mediated chromatin disruption event. This remodelling of chromatin is transient such that upon prolonged exposure to hormone the promoter becomes refractory to glucocorticoids. We demonstrate that this refractory state requires the continual presence of hormone and can be reversed by its removal. Our experiments show that the promoter is inactivated via a mechanism whereby histone H1 is dephosphorylated in response to glucocorticoids. Removal of glucocorticoids results in the rephosphorylation of histone H1 and the reacquisition of transcriptional competence by the promoter. This response is specific for the MMTV promoter assembled as chromatin and is not observed for another inducible gene or transiently transfected MMTV DNA. Finally, we demonstrate that H1 on the MMTV promoter is dephosphorylated when the promoter is unresponsive to glucocorticoids. These studies indicate that phosphorylated H1 is intimately linked with the GR-mediated disruption of MMTV chromatin in vivo.

Nucleosome translational position, not histone acetylation, determines TFIIIA binding to nucleosomal Xenopus laevis 5S rRNA genes

We sought to study the binding constraints placed on the nine-zinc-finger protein transcription factor IIIA (TFIIIA) by a histone octamer. To this end, five overlapping fragments of the Xenopus laevis oocyte and somatic 5S rRNA genes were reconstituted into nucleosomes, and it was subsequently shown that nucleosome translational positioning is a major determinant of the binding of TFIIIA to the 5S rRNA genes. Furthermore, it was found that histone acetylation cannot override the TFIIIA binding constraints imposed by unfavorable translational positions.

Histone H1 isoforms purified from rat liver bind nonspecifically to the nuclear factor 1 recognition sequence and serve as generalized transcriptional repressors

Two polypeptides with molecular masses of 34 and 30 kDa were copurified from rat liver during DNA affinity purification of a sequence-specific transcription factor binding to the footprint II sequence within the P2 promoter of the rat alpha1B adrenergic receptor (alpha1B AR) gene, and were identified by microsequencing their endoproteinase Lys-C-derived peptides as histone H1d and histone H1c, respectively. Histone H1 was previously reported to bind to the nuclear factor 1 (NF1) recognition sequence, although the specificity of this binding has been controversial. Here, DNA mobility shift and supershift assays, DNase I footprinting and mutational analyses indicated that the binding of histone H1 to the NF1 sites located within footprint II of the alpha1B AR gene P2 promoter is nonspecific. Transient cotransfections into Hep3B cells of histone H1d cDNA with CAT constructs containing promoter regions of different genes resulted in generalized and non-specific suppression of CAT activity. The histone H1d-mediated repression of the activities of the alpha1B AR gene P2/CAT or beta2 AR gene P(-186/1307)/CAT constructs was reversed by the cotransfection of a cDNA encoding the sequence-specific transcription factor NF1/X, and the fold increase in CAT activities was similar to that obtained in the absence of histone H1d. These results suggest that sequence-specific transcription factors counteract the histone H1-mediated transcriptional repression in vivo by a true activation, which is different from the in vitro antirepression in histone H1-repressed chromatin templates (Laybourn and Kadonaga, (1991) Science 254: 238-245).

Nucleolin: a multifunctional major nucleolar phosphoprotein

Nucleolin is a major protein of exponentially growing eukaryotic cells where it is present in abundance at the heart of the nucleolus. It is highly conserved during evolution. Nucleolin contains a specific bipartite nuclear localization signal sequence and possesses a number of unusual structural features. It has unique tripartite structure and each domain performs a specific function by interacting with DNA or RNA or proteins. Nucleolin exhibits intrinsic self-cleaving, DNA helicase, RNA helicase and DNA-dependent ATPase activities. Nucleolin also acts as a sequence-specific RNA binding protein, an autoantigen, and as the component of a B cell specific transcription factor. Its phosphorylation by cdc2, CK2, and PKC-zeta modulate some of its activities. This multifunctional protein has been implicated to be involved directly or indirectly in many metabolic processes such as ribosome biogenesis (which includes rDNA transcription, pre-rRNA synthesis, rRNA processing, ribosomal assembly and maturation), cytokinesis, nucleogenesis, cell proliferation and growth, cytoplasmic-nucleolar transport of ribosomal components, transcriptional repression, replication, signal transduction, inducing chromatin decondensation and many more (see text). In plants it is developmentally, cell-cycle, and light regulated. The regulation of all these functions of a single protein seems to be a challenging puzzle.

Differential effect of H1 variant overproduction on gene expression is due to differences in the central globular domain

The in vivo overproduction of two mouse histone H1 variants in homologous mouse fibroblasts has opposite effects on gene expression. Overproduction of H1(0) results in repression of transcript levels of all polymerase II genes tested. In contrast, overproduction of H1c results in elevated levels of transcripts. We created a series of chimeric H1 genes in which the regions encoding the three structural domains common to this family of these proteins were systematically switched. Overexpression of these genes in vivo resulted in the accumulation of large amounts of the chimeric H1 in chromatin. Analysis of the effects of overproduction of these proteins revealed that the differential effect of H1 variant overproduction on gene expression is due to differences in the central globular domain.

Structural and functional features of a specific nucleosome containing a recognition element for the thyroid hormone receptor

The Xenopus thyroid hormone receptor betaA (TRbetaA) gene contains an important thyroid hormone response element (TRE) that is assembled into a positioned nucleosome. We determine the translational position of the nucleosome containing the TRE and the rotational positioning of the double helix with respect to the histone surface. Histone H1 is incorporated into the nucleosome leading to an asymmetric protection to micrococcal nuclease cleavage of linker DNA relative to the nucleosome core. Histone H1 association is without significant consequence for the binding of the heterodimer of thyroid hormone receptor and 9-cis retinoic acid receptor (TR/RXR) to nucleosomal DNA in vitro, or for the regulation of TRbetaA gene transcription following microinjection into the oocyte nucleus. Small alterations of 3 and 6 bp in the translational positioning of the TRE in chromatin are also without effect on the transcriptional activity of the TRbetaA gene, whereas a small change in the rotational position of the TRE (3 bp) relative to the histone surface significantly reduces the binding of TR/RXR to the nucleosome and decreases transcriptional activation directed by TR/RXR. Our results indicate that the specific architecture of the nucleosome containing the TRE may have regulatory significance for expression of the TRbetaA gene.

One allele of the major histone gene cluster is enough for cell proliferation of the DT40 chicken B cell line

Thirty-nine of the 44 chicken histone genes are located in a major histone gene cluster of 110 kb, the others residing in four separate regions. We generated a heterozygous chicken DT40 mutant, 1/2 delta110 kb, devoid of one allele of the cluster, using gene targeting techniques. Analyses of the mutant revealed that the growth rate of DT40 cells was unchanged even in the absence of one allele of the cluster. Moreover, analyses involving a RNase protection assay, SDS-PAGE or Triton-acid-urea-PAGE revealed not only that in the 1/2 delta110 kb mutant the steady-state levels of total mRNAs of gene families H1, H2A, H2B, H3 and H4 remained constant, but also that the amounts of histones H1, H2A, H2B, H3 and H4 were not changed. A comparison by 2D-PAGE revealed no changes in total cellular protein patterns of the mutant. These observations demonstrate that all the histone gene families have the inherent ability to compensate for the disruption of one allele of the gene cluster, with no influence on cell functions.

Somatic linker histones cause loss of mesodermal competence in Xenopus

In Xenopus, cells from the animal hemisphere are competent to form mesodermal tissues from the morula through to the blastula stage. Loss of mesodermal competence at early gastrula is programmed cell-autonomously, and occurs even in single cells at the appropriate stage. To determine the mechanism by which this occurs, we have been investigating a concomitant, global change in expression of H1 linker histone subtypes. H1 histones are usually considered to be general repressors of transcription, but in Xenopus they are increasingly thought to have selective functions in transcriptional regulation. Xenopus eggs and embryos at stages before the midblastula transition are deficient in histone H1 protein, but contain an oocyte-specific variant called histone B4 or H1M. After the midblastula transition, histone B4 is progressively substituted by three somatic histone H1 variants, and replacement is complete by early neurula. Here we report that accumulation of somatic H1 protein is rate limiting for the loss of mesodermal competence. This involves selective transcriptional silencing of regulatory genes required for mesodermal differentiation pathways, like muscle, by somatic, but not maternal, H1 protein.

Competition between HMG-I(Y), HMG-1 and histone H1 on four-way junction DNA

High mobility group proteins HMG-I(Y) and HMG-1, as well as histone H1, all share the common property of binding to four-way junction DNA (4H), a synthetic substrate commonly used to study proteins involved in recognizing and resolving Holliday-type junctions formed during in vivo genetic recombination events. The structure of 4H has also been hypothesized to mimic the DNA crossovers occurring at, or near, the entrance and exit sites on the nucleosome. Furthermore, upon binding to either duplex DNA or chromatin, all three of these nuclear proteins share the ability to significantly alter the structure of bound substrates. In order to further elucidate their substrate binding abilities, electrophoretic mobility shift assays were employed to investigate the relative binding capabilities of HMG-I(Y), HMG-1 and H1 to 4H in vitro. Data indicate a definite hierarchy of binding preference by these proteins for 4H, with HMG-I(Y) having the highest affinity (Kd approximately 6.5 nM) when compared with either H1 (Kd approximately 16 nM) or HMG-1 (Kd approximately 80 nM). Competition/titration assays demonstrated that all three proteins bind most tightly to the same site on 4H. Hydroxyl radical footprinting identified the strongest site for binding of HMG-I(Y), and presumably for the other proteins as well, to be at the center of 4H. Together these in vitro results demonstrate that HMG-I(Y) and H1 are co-dominant over HMG-1 for binding to the central crossover region of 4H and suggest that in vivo both of these proteins may exert a dominant effect over HMG-1 in recognizing and binding to altered DNA structures, such as Holliday junctions, that have conformations similar to 4H.

A nucleosome positioned in the distal promoter region activates transcription of the human U6 gene

To investigate the consequences of chromatin reconstitution for transcription of the human U6 gene, we assembled nucleosomes on both plasmids and linear DNA fragments containing the U6 gene. Initial experiments with DNA fragments revealed that U6 sequences located between the distal sequence element (DSE) and the proximal sequence element (PSE) lead to the positioning of a nucleosome partially encompassing these promoter elements. Furthermore, indirect end-labelling analyses of the reconstituted U6 wild-type plasmids showed strong micrococcal nuclease cuts near the DSE and PSE, indicating that a nucleosome is located between these elements. To investigate the influence that nucleosomes exert on U6 transcription, we used two different experimental approaches for chromatin reconstitution, both of which resulted in the observation that transcription of the U6 wild-type gene was enhanced after chromatin assembly. To ensure that the facilitated transcription of the nucleosomal templates is in fact due to a positioned nucleosome, we constructed mutants of the U6 gene in which the sequences between the DSE and PSE were progressively deleted. In contrast to what was observed with the wild-type genes, transcription of these deletion mutants was significantly inhibited when they were packaged into nucleosomes.

Remodeling of regulatory nucleoprotein complexes on the Xenopus hsp70 promoter during meiotic maturation of the Xenopus oocyte

Transcriptional repression occurs during meiotic maturation of Xenopus oocytes. Injection of a DNA template containing an hsp70 promoter into Xenopus oocytes, followed by progesterone-induced maturation has been used to demonstrate a dynamic competition between the assembly of transcription factor-containing nucleoprotein complexes and repressive nucleosomal arrays during the maturation process. In particular, it is shown that increased levels of injected heat shock protein, the transcriptional activator Gal4-VP16 or the DNA template itself all lead to reduced repression of transcription on maturation. Conversely, injection of additional histone increases repression. Repression of transcription is shown to be accompanied by the formation of a more regular array of nucleosomes and by an increase in the efficiency of nucleosome assembly on the injected plasmid. Meiotic maturation is therefore accompanied by replacement of transcription factor complexes by a repressive chromatin environment.

In vitro chromatin assembly of the HIV-1 promoter. ATP-dependent polar repositioning of nucleosomes by Sp1 and NFkappaB

Nuclease hypersensitive sites exist in vivo in the chromatin of the integrated human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 proviral genome, in the 5'-long terminal repeat (LTR) within the promoter/enhancer region near Sp1 and NFkappaB binding sites. Previous studies from the Kadonaga and Jones laboratories have shown that Sp1 and NFkappaB can establish hypersensitive sites in a truncated form of this LTR when added before in vitro chromatin assembly with Drosophila extracts, thus facilitating subsequent transcriptional activation of a linked reporter gene upon the association of additional factors (Pazin, M. J., Sheridan, P. L., Cannon, K., Cao, Z., Keck, J. G., Kadanaga, J. T., and Jones, K. A. (1996) Genes & Dev. 10, 37-49). Here we assess the role of a full-length LTR and 1 kilobase pair of downstream flanking HIV sequences in chromatin remodeling when these transcription factors are added after chromatin assembly. Using Xenopus laevis oocyte extracts to assemble chromatin in vitro, we have confirmed that Sp1 and NFkappaB can indeed induce sites hypersensitive to DNase I, micrococcal nuclease, or restriction enzymes on either side of factor binding sites in chromatin but not naked DNA. We extend these earlier studies by demonstrating that the process is ATP-dependent when the factors are added after chromatin assembly and that histone H1, AP1, TBP, or Tat had no effect on hypersensitive site formation. Furthermore, we have found that nucleosomes upstream of NFkappaB sites are rotationally positioned prior to factor binding and that their translational frame is registered after binding NFkappaB. On the other hand, binding of Sp1 positions adjacent downstream nucleosome(s). We term this polar repositioning because each factor aligns nucleosomes only on one side of its binding sites. Mutational analysis and oligonucleotide competition each demonstrated that this remodeling required Sp1 and NFkappaB binding sites.

A mouse histone H1 variant, H1b, binds preferentially to a regulatory sequence within a mouse H3.2 replication-dependent histone gene

H1 histones, found in all multicellular eukaryotes, associate with linker DNA between adjacent nucleosomes, presumably to keep the chromatin in a compact, helical state. The identification of multiple histone H1 subtypes in vertebrates suggests these proteins have specialized roles in chromatin organization and thus influence the regulation of gene expression in the multicellular organism. The mechanism by which the association of H1 with nucleosomal DNA is regulated is not completely understood, but affinity for different DNA sequences may play a role. Here we report that a specific H1 subtype in the mouse, namely H1b, selectively binds to a regulatory element within the protein-encoding sequence of a replication-dependent mouse H3.2 gene. We have previously shown that this coding region element, Omega, is the target of very specific interactions in vitro with another nuclear factor called the Omega factor. This element is required for normal gene expression in stably transfected rodent cells. The mouse H1b protein interacts poorly (100-fold lower affinity) with the comparable "Omega" sequence of a replication-independent mouse H3.3 gene. This H3.3 sequence differs at only 4 out of 22 nucleotide positions from the H3.2 sequence. Our findings raise the possibility that this H1b protein plays a specific role in regulation of expression of the replication-dependent histone gene family.

Changes in histone synthesis and modification at the beginning of mouse development correlate with the establishment of chromatin mediated repression of transcription

The transition from a late 1-cell mouse embryo to a 4-cell embryo, the period when zygotic gene expression begins, is accompanied by an increasing ability to repress the activities of promoters and replication origins. Since this repression can be relieved by either butyrate or enhancers, it appears to be mediated through chromatin structure. Here we identify changes in the synthesis and modification of chromatin bound histones that are consistent with this hypothesis. Oocytes, which can repress promoter activity, synthesized a full complement of histones, and histone synthesis up to the early 2-cell stage originated from mRNA inherited from the oocyte. However, while histones H3 and H4 continued to be synthesized in early 1-cell embryos, synthesis of histones H2A, H2B and H1 (proteins required for chromatin condensation) was delayed until the late 1-cell stage, reaching their maximum rate in early 2-cell embryos. Moreover, histone H4 in both 1-cell and 2-cell embryos was predominantly diacetylated (a modification that facilitates transcription). Deacetylation towards the unacetylated and monoacetylated H4 population in fibroblasts began at the late 2-cell to 4-cell stage. Arresting development at the beginning of S-phase in 1-cell embryos prevented both the appearance of chromatin-mediated repression of transcription in paternal pronuclei and synthesis of new histones. These changes correlated with the establishment of chromatin-mediated repression during formation of a 2-cell embryo, and the increase in repression from the 2-cell to 4-cell stage as linker histone H1 accumulates and core histones are deacetylated.

Transcription of dinucleosomal templates

Nucleosomes and the chromatin structures they assemble provide the architectural foundation for the transcription process. We describe the use of reconstituted chromatin templates assembled using purified histones and HMGs to investigate the significance of chromatin structure for transcription. Our structural assays include sucrose gradient fractionation, nucleoprotein gel analysis, micrococcal nuclease digestion, DNase I and hydroxyl radical cleavage mapping of nucleosome position, and determination of nucleosome mobility. We determine the consequences of incorporation of linker histones or HMG1 on the properties of the nucleosome and the transcription process. Our results indicate that linker histones and HMG1 can direct the positioning of core histone-DNA interactions, restrict nucleosome mobility, and repress transcription.

What do linker histones do in chromatin?

Knockout experiments in Tetrahymena show that linker histone H1 is not essential for nuclear assembly or cell viability. These results, together with a series of biochemical and cell biological observations, challenge the existing paradigm that requires linker histones to be a key organizing component of higher-order chromatin structure. The H1 knockouts also reveal a much more subtle role for H1. Instead of acting as a general transcriptional repressor, H1 is found to regulate a limited number of specific genes. Surprisingly, H1 can both activate and repress transcription. We discuss how this architectural protein might accomplish this important regulatory role.

The five cleavage-stage (CS) histones of the sea urchin are encoded by a maternally expressed family of replacement histone genes: functional equivalence of the CS H1 and frog H1M (B4) proteins

The cleavage-stage (CS) histones of the sea urchin are known to be maternally expressed in the egg, have been implicated in chromatin remodeling of the male pronucleus following fertilization, and are the only histone variants present in embryonic chromatin up to the four-cell stage. With the help of partial peptide sequence information, we have isolated and identified CS H1, H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 cDNAs from egg poly(A)+ mRNA of the sea urchin Psammechinus miliaris. All five CS proteins correspond to replacement histone variants which are encoded by replication-independent genes containing introns, poly(A) addition signals, and long nontranslated sequences. Transcripts of the CS histone genes could be detected only during oogenesis and in development up to the early blastula stage. The CS proteins, with the exception of H4, are unique histones which are distantly related in sequence to the early, late, and sperm histone subtypes of the sea urchin. In contrast, the CS H1 protein displays highest sequence homology with the H1M (B4) histone of Xenopus laevis. Both H1 proteins are replacement histone variants with very similar developmental expression profiles in their respective species, thus indicating that the frog H1M (B4) gene is a vertebrate homolog of the CS H1 gene. These data furthermore suggest that the CS histones are of ancient evolutionary origin and may perform similar conserved functions during oogenesis and early development in different species.

Chromatin modifications during oogenesis in the mouse: removal of somatic subtypes of histone H1 from oocyte chromatin occurs post-natally through a post-transcriptional mechanism

We examined the distribution of the somatic subtypes of histone H1 and the variant subtype, H1(0), and their encoding mRNAs during oogenesis and early embryogenesis in the mouse. As detected using immunocytochemistry, somatic H1 was present in the nuclei of oocytes of 18-day embryos. Following birth, however, somatic H1 became less abundant in both growing and non-growing oocytes, beginning as early as 4 days of age in the growing oocytes, and was scarcely detectable by 19 days. Together with previous results, this defines a period of time when somatic H1 is depleted in oocytes, namely, from shortly after birth when the oocytes are at prophase I until the 4-cell stage following fertilization. At the stages when somatic H1 was undetectable, oocyte nuclei could be stained using an antibody raised against histone H1(0), which suggests that this may be a major linker histone in these cells. In contrast to the post-natal loss of somatic H1 protein, mRNAs encoding four (H1a, H1b, H1d, H1e) of the five somatic subtypes were present, as detected using RT-PCR in growing oocytes of 9-day pups, and all five subtypes including H1c were present in fully grown oocytes of adults. All five subtypes were also present in embryos, both before and after activation of the embryonic genome. mRNA encoding H1(0) was also detected in oocytes and early embryos. Whole-mount in situ hybridization using cloned H1c and H1e cDNAs revealed that the mRNAs were present in the cytoplasm of oocytes and 1-cell embryos, in contrast to the sea urchin early embryo where they are sequestered in the cell nucleus. We suggest that, as in many somatic cell types, the chromatin of mouse oocytes becomes depleted of somatic H1 and relatively enriched in histone H1(0) postnatally, and that somatic H1 is reassembled onto chromatin in cleavage-stage embryos. The post-natal loss of somatic H1 appears to be regulated post-transcriptionally by a mechanism not involving nuclear localization.

The AT-rich flanks of the oocyte-type 5S RNA gene of Xenopus laevis act as a strong local signal for histone H1-mediated chromatin reorganization in vitro

In vivo, histone H1 plays an active role in establishing the transcriptionally repressed chromatin state of the oocyte-type 5S RNA genes in the early stages of Xenopus development. By using fully defined in vitro system of chromatin assembly on plasmids with cloned oocyte- or somatic-type 5S gene repeats we found that the oocyte repeat which comprises a 120 bp oocyte-type 5S RNA gene placed within the few hundred bp long native AT-rich flanks, but not the somatic repeat (a similar 120 bp somatic-type 5S RNA gene placed within native GC-rich flanks) enables histone H1 to realign the nucleosomal core particles densely packed on plasmid DNA. The realignment results in creation of the repeat unit of approximately 240 bp and is achieved through complete removal of several core histone complexes from plasmid template with the oocyte-type repeat. This effect of H1 is independent on the plasmid sequences and seems to be solely due to the presence in the oocyte-repeat of the AT-rich flanks. The effects of H1 are completely suppressed by distamycin A, a drug that specifically recognizes and binds oligo(dA).oligo(dT) runs in DNA. The binding of H1 results in increased protection of DNA sites within the AT-rich oocyte-type 5S repeat. In an in vitro transcription assay performed with reconstituted chromatin templates containing plasmids with the oocyte- or somatic-type repeats only the transcription of the oocyte-type 5S RNA gene was repressed in the presence of physiological concentration of histone H1. These results support the view that the AT-rich flanks of the oocyte-type 5S RNA gene are involved in histone H1-mediated chromatin reorganization that results in the transcriptional repression observed in vivo.

Phosphorylation of linker histone is associated with transcriptional activation in a normally silent nucleus

Previous studies have suggested that micronuclear linker histones are phosphorylated by cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) in Tetrahymena (Sweet, M.T., and C.D. Allis. 1993. Chromosoma. 102: 637-647). In this study, we report that a rapid and dramatic phosphorylation of the micronuclear linker histone, delta, occurs early in the sexual pathway, conjugation. Phosphorylated isoforms of delta are detected as early as 30 min after mixing cells of different mating types; blocking pair formation abolishes this induction completely. Phosphorylation of delta is stimulated by the addition of N6-benzoyladenosine 3':5' cyclic monophosphate to starved (nonmating) cells, suggesting that a PKA/cAMP signal transduction pathway is involved. Maximal phosphorylation of delta is observed during meiotic prophase, a period when micronuclei become transcriptionally active. In situ staining, using phospho-delta-specific antibodies combined with [3H]uridine autoradiography, shows that decondensed micronuclear chromatin undergoing active transcription is enriched in phosphorylated delta isoforms. In contrast, condensed inactive micronuclear chromatin is enriched in dephosphorylated delta. These results strongly suggest that phosphorylation of linker histone plays an important and previously unsuspected role in establishing transcriptional competence in micronuclei.

Functional domains for assembly of histones H3 and H4 into the chromatin of Xenopus embryos

Histones H3 and H4 have a well defined structural role in the nucleosome and an established role in the regulation of transcription. We have made use of a microinjection strategy using Xenopus embryos to define the minimal structural components of H3 and H4 necessary for nucleosome assembly into metazoan chromosomes in vivo. We find that both the N-terminal tail of H4, including all sites of acetylation, and the C-terminal alpha-helix of the H4 histone fold domain are dispensable for chromatin assembly. The N-terminal tail and an N-terminal alpha-helix of H3 are also dispensable for chromatin assembly. However, the remainder of the H3 and H4 histone folds are essential for incorporation of these proteins into chromatin. We suggest that elements of the histone fold domain maintain both nucleosomal integrity and have distinct functions essential for cell viability.

Linker histone H1 regulates specific gene expression but not global transcription in vivo

In a linker histone H1 knockout strain (delta H1) of Tetrahymena thermophila, the number of mature RNAs produced by genes transcribed by pol I and pol III and of most genes transcribed by pol II remains unchanged. However, H1 is required for the normal basal repression of a gene (ngoA) in growing cells but is not required for its activated expression in starved cells. Surprisingly, H1 is required for the activated expression of another gene (CyP) in starved cells but not for its repression in growing cells. Thus, H1 does not have a major effect on global transcription but can act as either a positive or negative gene-specific regulator of transcription in vivo.

Somatic histone H1 microinjected into fertilized mouse eggs is transported into the pronuclei but does not disrupt subsequent preimplantation development

We injected somatic subtypes of histone H1 into newly fertilized mouse eggs, which do not naturally contain this chromosomal protein, and examined the fate of the injected protein and its effect on preimplantation development of recipient eggs. Rhodamine-labelled H1 injected into the cytoplasm of 53 eggs was transported into the pronuclei in 51 cases, and this nuclear accumulation could be detected within 15 min of injection. Unlabelled histone H1, which was detected using immunofluorescence, was also transported following microinjection to the pronuclei, where it colocalized with the chromatin and remained associated with the nuclei following cleavage to the two-cell stage. Nuclear accumulation of injected H1 was inhibited when injected eggs were incubated in the presence of drugs that prevent mitochondrial electron transport or glycolysis, which indicates that nuclear transport occurs through an energy-dependent process, as previously observed in tissue culture cells. To determine whether the presence of somatic H1 in early embryonic nuclei would influence subsequent development, fertilized eggs were injected with an approximately physiological quantity (1-5 pg) of somatic H1 or, as controls, with another small basic protein, cytochrome c. Fifty-three eggs were injected with cytochrome c, of which 51 divided to the two-cell stage, and 32 (60%) reached the blastocyst stage, after 5 days in culture. One hundred and eleven eggs were injected with somatic H1, of which 95 divided to the two-cell stage, and 53 (48%) reached the blastocyst stage, after 5 days in culture. The two groups did not differ statistically (chi 2, P > 0.1) with respect to the fraction of injected embryos that developed to the blastocyst stage. These results show that, although mouse embryos lack the somatic subtypes of histone H1 until the four-cell stage of development, they are able to progress through preimplantation development when these subtypes are present beginning at the one-cell stage. This may imply that the distinctive chromatin composition that characterizes early embryos of a variety of species is not essential for early development in mammals.