101
|
Vidal C. The Asian wasp Vespa velutina nigrithorax: Entomological and allergological characteristics. Clin Exp Allergy 2021; 52:489-498. [PMID: 34822191 DOI: 10.1111/cea.14063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 10/31/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The yellow-legged or Asian wasp (Vespa velutina nigrithorax) has spread rapidly across Europe since its first introduction in France, in 2004. Originally from South-East Asia, it is considered an invasive species outside its native region. Apart from the ecological and economic implications of its presence, it may cause health problems to humans due to the toxic and allergenic components of its venom. Vespa velutina nigrithorax has become the most prevalent cause of anaphylaxis due to Hymenoptera venom in some regions of Spain. Although sIgE against both antigen 5 (Vesp v 5) and A1-phospholipase (Vesp v 1) has been detected in these patients, only Vesp v 5 may be considered a dominant allergen. Interestingly, Vesp v 1 appears to be a glycosylated allergen different from A1-phospholipases from other species. Inhibition studies suggest that Vespula spp venom could behave as primary sensitizer. Besides, changes in sIgE and sIgG4 during Vespula venom immunotherapy in patients with anaphylaxis due to V. velutina support the use of Vespula venom extracts to treat these patients. The purpose of this review is to explore the biological behaviour of V. velutina and to summarize the current knowledge of the allergic reactions provoked by this wasp.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Vidal
- Allergy Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Faculty of Medicine, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
102
|
Vultaggio A, Perlato M, Nencini F, Vivarelli E, Maggi E, Matucci A. How to Prevent and Mitigate Hypersensitivity Reactions to Biologicals Induced by Anti-Drug Antibodies? Front Immunol 2021; 12:765747. [PMID: 34790200 PMCID: PMC8591239 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.765747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Biologicals are widely used therapeutic agents for rheumatologic diseases, cancers, and other chronic inflammatory diseases. They are characterized by complex structures and content of variable amounts of foreign regions, which may lead to anti-drug antibodies (ADA) development. ADA onset may limit the clinical usage of biologicals because they may decrease their safety. In fact they are mainly associated with immediate hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). Development of ADAs is reduced by concomitant immunosuppressive treatment, while it is increased by longer intervals between drug administrations; thus, regular infusion regimens should be preferred to reduce HSRs. Once ADAs have formed, some procedures can be implemented to reduce the risk of HSRs. ADAs may belong to different isotype; the detection of IgE ADA is advisable to be assessed when high and early ADAs are detected, in order to reduce the risk of severe HRs. In patients who need to reintroduce the biological culprit, as alternative therapies are not available, drug desensitization (DD) may be applied. Desensitization should be conceptually dedicated to patients with an IgE-mediated HSR; however, it can be performed also in patients who had developed non-IgE-mediated HSRs. Although the underlying mechanisms behind successful DD has not been fully clarified, the DD procedure is associated with the inhibition of mast cell degranulation and cytokine production. Additionally, some data are emerging about the inhibition of drug-specific immune responses during DD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Margherita Perlato
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesca Nencini
- Immunoallergology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Enrico Maggi
- Translational Immunology Unit, Immunology Area, Pediatric Hospital Bambino Gesù, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCSS), Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Matucci
- Immunoallergology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
103
|
Briceno Noriega D, Teodorowicz M, Savelkoul H, Ruinemans-Koerts J. The Basophil Activation Test for Clinical Management of Food Allergies: Recent Advances and Future Directions. J Asthma Allergy 2021; 14:1335-1348. [PMID: 34754200 PMCID: PMC8572092 DOI: 10.2147/jaa.s237759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The basophil activation test (BAT) is an ex vivo functional assay that measures by flow cytometry the degree of basophil degranulation after stimulation with an allergen. In recent years, there has been an increased interest in the diagnostic value of the BAT as it has the potential to mimic the clinical phenotype of sIgE sensitized patients, in contrast to allergen-specific IgE levels. This diagnostic potential would be of particular interest for food allergies present early in life such as peanut, cow’s milk and eggs, which require an expensive, time-consuming and patient unfriendly oral food challenge (OFC) for diagnosis. However, routine applications of the BAT for clinical use are not yet feasible due to the lack of standardized protocols and large clinical validation studies. This review will summarize the current data regarding the application of the BAT in food allergy (FA) for cow’s milk, egg and peanut, being the most common causes of FA in children. Additionally, it will discuss the hurdles for widespread clinical use of the BAT and possible future directions for this diagnostic procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Briceno Noriega
- Cell Biology and Immunology Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Malgorzata Teodorowicz
- Cell Biology and Immunology Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Huub Savelkoul
- Cell Biology and Immunology Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Janneke Ruinemans-Koerts
- Cell Biology and Immunology Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.,Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
104
|
van Zelm MC, McKenzie CI, Varese N, Rolland JM, O’Hehir RE. Advances in allergen-specific immune cell measurements for improved detection of allergic sensitization and immunotherapy responses. Allergy 2021; 76:3374-3382. [PMID: 34355403 DOI: 10.1111/all.15036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Over the past two decades, precision medicine has advanced diagnostics and treatment of allergic diseases. Component-resolved analysis of allergen sensitization facilitates stratification of patients. Furthermore, new formulations of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) products can more effectively deliver the relevant components. Molecular insights from the identification of allergen component sensitization and clinical outcomes of treatment with new AIT formulations can now be utilized for a deeper understanding of the nature of the pathogenic immune response in allergy and how this can be corrected by AIT. Fundamental in these processes are the allergen-specific B and T cells. Within the large B- and T-cell compartments, only those that specifically recognize the allergen with their immunoglobulin (Ig) or T-cell receptor (TCR), respectively, are of clinical relevance. With peripheral blood allergen-specific B- and T-cell frequencies below 1%, bulk cell analysis is typically insufficiently sensitive. We here review the latest technologies to detect allergen-specific B and T cells, as well as new developments in utilizing these tools for diagnostics and therapy monitoring to advance precision medicine for allergic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Menno C. van Zelm
- Department of Immunology and Pathology Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne VIC Australia
- Department of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine Central Clinical School Monash University, and Alfred Hospital Melbourne VIC Australia
| | - Craig I. McKenzie
- Department of Immunology and Pathology Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne VIC Australia
| | - Nirupama Varese
- Department of Immunology and Pathology Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne VIC Australia
- Department of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine Central Clinical School Monash University, and Alfred Hospital Melbourne VIC Australia
| | - Jennifer M. Rolland
- Department of Immunology and Pathology Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne VIC Australia
- Department of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine Central Clinical School Monash University, and Alfred Hospital Melbourne VIC Australia
| | - Robyn E. O’Hehir
- Department of Immunology and Pathology Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne VIC Australia
- Department of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine Central Clinical School Monash University, and Alfred Hospital Melbourne VIC Australia
| |
Collapse
|
105
|
Quoc QL, Bich TCT, Jang JH, Park HS. Recent update on the management of anaphylaxis. Clin Exp Emerg Med 2021; 8:160-172. [PMID: 34649404 PMCID: PMC8517462 DOI: 10.15441/ceem.21.121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Anaphylaxis is a life-threatening systemic allergic reaction presenting various clinical manifestations. Its prevalence has increased in almost all age groups and both sexes. Food, venom, and drugs are major causes in both children and adults; a higher prevalence of food-induced anaphylaxis is noted in children, while a higher prevalence of drug-induced anaphylaxis is noted in adults. The pathogenic mechanism is mediated by immunologic and nonimmunologic mechanisms, where mast cells and basophils are key cells that release mediators. A diagnosis of anaphylaxis is mainly based on clinical symptoms and physical findings; however, an increased serum tryptase level is a useful biomarker. Epinephrine is the first-line drug to treat acute symptoms, and an epinephrine auto-injector should be prescribed for each patient. Antihistamines and systemic corticosteroids are used to relieve symptoms. This review updates current issues in the management of anaphylaxis as well as the new guidelines for proper diagnosis and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quang Luu Quoc
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Tra Cao Thi Bich
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Jae-Hyuk Jang
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Hae-Sim Park
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
106
|
Oral Immunotherapy for Children with Cow's Milk Allergy. Pathogens 2021; 10:pathogens10101328. [PMID: 34684278 PMCID: PMC8539286 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens10101328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Revised: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Cow's milk allergy (CMA) is one of the most common IgE-dependent food allergies in children. Some children develop severe and persistent CMA, with near-fatal reactions after exposure to trace amounts of cow's milk (CM). Because milk and dairy products are included in various processed food products, it is difficult to completely remove milk, which negatively affects the quality of life of children with CMA. Oral immunotherapy (OIT) can alleviate food allergen-induced anaphylaxis under continuous ingestion of a little of the causative food. Children with severe CMA may benefit from OIT, but the treatment requires a long time and poses a risk of anaphylaxis. Moreover, in recent years, new therapies, including omalizumab, sublingual immunotherapy, and epicutaneous immunotherapy, have played the role of optional OIT. In this review, we present the current methods of and other attempts at OIT, and discuss OIT for safely treating CMA.
Collapse
|
107
|
Triwatcharikorn J, Puaratana-Arunkon T, Punyaratabandhu P, Mongkolpathumrat P, Palapinyo S, Buranapraditkul S, Rerknimitr P, Klaewsongkram J. Acute urticaria alone after CoronaVac COVID-19 vaccination should not be a contraindication for revaccination. Clin Exp Dermatol 2021; 47:735-738. [PMID: 34609771 PMCID: PMC8652927 DOI: 10.1111/ced.14962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Revised: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Patients who develop an immediate allergic reaction within the first 4 h of COVID‐19 vaccine injection are recommended not to receive the same vaccine again. This recommendation mainly focuses on the mRNA and adenoviral vector COVID‐19 vaccines, but data for whole virus vaccines are unknown. We report seven patients who developed an immediate reaction within 4 h (six had generalized urticaria, one had localized urticaria) after the first vaccination with CoronaVac, the inactivated SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccine. The results of skin tests and basophil activation tests suggested that spike peptides play a role in exacerbating urticaria in some patients. However, all subjects who developed urticaria within 4 h after CoronaVac vaccination were successfully revaccinated without graded challenge, although recurrent urticaria was common. This preliminary result indicates that acute urticaria alone should not be a contraindication for the second dose of CoronaVac if the supply of alternative vaccines is limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Triwatcharikorn
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - T Puaratana-Arunkon
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - P Punyaratabandhu
- Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Bamrasnaradura Infectious Diseases Institute, Nonthaburi, Thailand
| | - P Mongkolpathumrat
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.,King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - S Palapinyo
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - S Buranapraditkul
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.,King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - P Rerknimitr
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.,King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.,The Skin and Allergy Research Unit, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - J Klaewsongkram
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.,King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.,The Skin and Allergy Research Unit, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
108
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Utilization of basophil activation in the diagnosis and monitoring of food allergy has gained increasing recognition. An ex-vivo functional assay, basophil activation reflects clinical reactivity, thereby providing clinically relevant insights. Moreover, as a biomarker of reactivity and tolerance, basophil activation testing (BAT) may provide a useful tool for management of food allergies. Despite its utility, significant limitations of BAT have prevented widespread use. Addressing these limitations will increase the future application and adoption of BAT in food allergy. RECENT FINDINGS A number of clinical trials in the past few years have demonstrated the use of BAT in the diagnosis and treatment of food allergy. Specifically, BAT has been found to be a biomarker of tolerance. SUMMARY Basophil activation testing is an effective biomarker for diagnosis and monitoring of food allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarun Keswani
- Center for Immunological and Inflammatory Diseases, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Sarita U. Patil
- Center for Immunological and Inflammatory Diseases, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114
- Food Allergy Center, Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114
| |
Collapse
|
109
|
McKenzie CI, Varese N, Aui PM, Wines BD, Hogarth PM, Thien F, Hew M, Rolland JM, O’Hehir RE, Zelm MC. CytoBas: Precision component-resolved diagnostics for allergy using flow cytometric staining of basophils with recombinant allergen tetramers. Allergy 2021; 76:3028-3040. [PMID: 33772805 PMCID: PMC8518718 DOI: 10.1111/all.14832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diagnostic tests for allergy rely on detecting allergen-specific IgE. Component-resolved diagnostics incorporate multiple defined allergen components to improve the quality of diagnosis and patient care. OBJECTIVE To develop a new approach for determining sensitization to specific allergen components that utilizes fluorescent protein tetramers for direct staining of IgE on blood basophils by flow cytometry. METHODS Recombinant forms of Lol p 1 and Lol p 5 proteins from ryegrass pollen (RGP) and Api m 1 from honeybee venom (BV) were produced, biotinylated, and tetramerized with streptavidin-fluorochrome conjugates. Blood samples from 50 RGP-allergic, 41 BV-allergic, and 26 controls were incubated with fluorescent protein tetramers for flow cytometric evaluation of basophil allergen binding and activation. RESULTS Allergen tetramers bound to and activated basophils from relevant allergic patients but not controls. Direct fluorescence staining of Api m 1 and Lol p 1 tetramers had greater positive predictive values than basophil activation for BV and RGP allergy, respectively, as defined with receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves. Staining intensities of allergen tetramers correlated with allergen-specific IgE levels in serum. Inclusion of multiple allergens coupled with distinct fluorochromes in a single-tube assay enabled rapid detection of sensitization to both Lol p 1 and Lol p 5 in RGP-allergic patients and discriminated between controls, BV-allergic, and RGP-allergic patients. CONCLUSION Our novel flow cytometric assay, termed CytoBas, enables rapid and reliable detection of clinically relevant allergic sensitization. The intensity of fluorescent allergen tetramer staining of basophils has a high positive predictive value for disease, and the assay can be multiplexed for a component-resolved and differential diagnostic test for allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Craig I. McKenzie
- Department of Immunology and Pathology Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne VIC Australia
| | - Nirupama Varese
- Department of Immunology and Pathology Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne VIC Australia
- Department of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne VIC Australia
| | - Pei M. Aui
- Department of Immunology and Pathology Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne VIC Australia
| | - Bruce D. Wines
- Department of Immunology and Pathology Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne VIC Australia
- Immune Therapies Group Burnet Institute Melbourne Australia
- Department of Pathology The University of Melbourne Parkville VIC Australia
| | - Philip Mark Hogarth
- Department of Immunology and Pathology Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne VIC Australia
- Immune Therapies Group Burnet Institute Melbourne Australia
- Department of Pathology The University of Melbourne Parkville VIC Australia
| | - Francis Thien
- Respiratory Medicine Eastern HealthBox Hill and Monash University Melbourne VIC Australia
| | - Mark Hew
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Monash University Melbourne VIC Australia
- Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology Alfred Health Melbourne VIC Australia
| | - Jennifer M. Rolland
- Department of Immunology and Pathology Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne VIC Australia
- Department of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne VIC Australia
| | - Robyn E. O’Hehir
- Department of Immunology and Pathology Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne VIC Australia
- Department of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne VIC Australia
- Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology Alfred Health Melbourne VIC Australia
| | - Menno C. Zelm
- Department of Immunology and Pathology Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne VIC Australia
- Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology Alfred Health Melbourne VIC Australia
| |
Collapse
|
110
|
Bringing the Next Generation of Food Allergy Diagnostics into the Clinic. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2021; 10:1-9. [PMID: 34530176 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Revised: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Food allergy diagnosis has a massive impact on the lives of patients and their families. Despite recent developments with specific IgE to component allergens, a significant proportion of patients assessed for possible food allergy require oral food challenge to ensure an accurate diagnosis. More precise diagnostic methods are required to reduce the need for oral food challenges. Bead-based epitope assays and cellular tests, such as basophil activation and mast cell tests are the most novel and promising tests on the horizon. There is a pathway to pursue to enable their incorporation in clinical practice, including standardization, technical validation, clinical validation, external validation, overcoming practical and logistical issues, and regulatory approval. Valuable clinical application of these tests goes beyond diagnosis and includes risk assessment to identify allergic patients who are most sensitive and at risk for severe allergic reactions, and to define prognosis and assess clinical response to immunomodulatory treatments.
Collapse
|
111
|
Characterization of New Allergens from the Venom of the European Paper Wasp Polistes dominula. Toxins (Basel) 2021; 13:toxins13080559. [PMID: 34437431 PMCID: PMC8402607 DOI: 10.3390/toxins13080559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Discriminating Polistes dominula and Vespula spp. venom allergy is of growing importance worldwide, as systemic reactions to either species’ sting can lead to severe outcomes. Administering the correct allergen-specific immunotherapy is therefore a prerequisite to ensure the safety and health of venom-allergic patients. Component-resolved diagnostics of Hymenoptera venom allergy might be improved by adding additional allergens to the diagnostic allergen panel. Therefore, three potential new allergens from P. dominula venom—immune responsive protein 30 (IRP30), vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF C) and phospholipase A2 (PLA2)—were cloned, recombinantly produced and biochemically characterized. Sera sIgE titers of Hymenoptera venom-allergic patients were measured in vitro to assess the allergenicity and potential cross-reactivity of the venom proteins. IRP30 and VEGF C were classified as minor allergens, as sensitization rates lay around 20–40%. About 50% of P. dominula venom-allergic patients had measurable sIgE titers directed against PLA2 from P. dominula venom. Interestingly, PLA2 was unable to activate basophils of allergic patients, questioning its role in the context of clinically relevant sensitization. Although the obtained results hint to a questionable benefit of the characterized P. dominula venom proteins for improved diagnosis of venom-allergic patients, they can contribute to a deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms of Hymenoptera venoms and to the identification of factors that determine the allergenic potential of proteins.
Collapse
|
112
|
Amano H, Kitagawa Y, Hayakawa T, Muto T, Okumura A, Iwayama H. Methylprednisolone-induced anaphylaxis diagnosed by intradermal skin test: a case report. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 2021; 17:70. [PMID: 34256829 PMCID: PMC8276418 DOI: 10.1186/s13223-021-00570-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Glucocorticoids rarely cause anaphylaxis. Common methods for the determination of allergens include in vivo skin prick test (SPT) and intradermal skin test (IDST) and the in vitro basophil activation test (BAT). However, to our knowledge, the best strategy for diagnosing glucocorticoid-induced anaphylaxis has not been elucidated. Case presentation A 10-year-old boy was admitted to our hospital because of 2 weeks of fever and arthralgia. He had not been treated with glucocorticoids before, including methylprednisolone (mPSL). He was suspected to have bacterial myositis and was treated with ceftriaxone. However, his symptoms persisted for > 2 weeks. Autoinflammatory arthritis was suspected, and he was treated with mPSL sodium succinate (MPS) pulse therapy (30 mg/kg). After 15 min of mPSL injection, he had wheezing and generalized wheal formation with decreased oxygen saturation. As anaphylaxis was suspected, mPSL was discontinued, and olopatadine and oxygen were administered. The symptoms improved considerably without the use of epinephrine and disappeared in 30 min. One month after discharge, SPT, IDST, and BAT were performed without discontinuing his prescribed oral prednisolone. SPTs for MPS, hydrocortisone sodium succinate (HCS), prednisolone sodium succinate (PSS), dexamethasone sodium phosphate (DSP), and betamethasone sodium phosphate (BSP) were negative. IDSTs for MPS, HCS, and PSS were positive, whereas those for DSP and BSP were negative. By contrast, BATs for MPS, HCS, and PSS were negative. Although glucocorticoid-induced hypersensitivity caused by nonmedicinal ingredients such as lactose, carboxymethylcellulose, polyethylene glycol, and hexylene glycol has been reported; the glucocorticoids tested in this patient did not contain any of these nonmedicinal ingredients. As the glucocorticoids that were positive on IDST share a succinate ester, this might have caused MPS-induced anaphylaxis. Conclusions We report the case of MPS-induced anaphylaxis diagnosed by IDST but not BAT. In case reports of glucocorticoid-induced anaphylaxis in the literature, most patients were diagnosed with SPT or IDST. These results suggest that BAT should be considered when IDST and SPT are negative. Further studies are necessary to clarify the best strategy for diagnosing glucocorticoid-induced anaphylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hitomi Amano
- Postgraduate Clinical Training Center, Aichi Medical University Hospital, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan
| | - Yoshiro Kitagawa
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Aichi Medical University, 1-1, Yazakokarimata, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan.,Nagakute Kitagawa Children's Clinic, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan
| | - Tomohito Hayakawa
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Aichi Medical University, 1-1, Yazakokarimata, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan
| | - Taichiro Muto
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Aichi Medical University, 1-1, Yazakokarimata, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan
| | - Akihisa Okumura
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Aichi Medical University, 1-1, Yazakokarimata, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Iwayama
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Aichi Medical University, 1-1, Yazakokarimata, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
113
|
Testera-Montes A, Salas M, Palomares F, Ariza A, Torres MJ, Rondón C, Eguiluz-Gracia I. Local Respiratory Allergy: From Rhinitis Phenotype to Disease Spectrum. Front Immunol 2021; 12:691964. [PMID: 34149736 PMCID: PMC8206788 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.691964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Local respiratory allergy (LRA) is defined by the negativity of atopy tests, a clinical history suggestive of airway allergy and a positive response to the nasal and/or bronchial allergen challenge. The clinical spectrum of LRA is comprised of three conditions: local allergic rhinitis (LAR) and local allergic asthma in non-atopic patients, and dual allergic rhinitis (coexistence of allergic rhinitis and LAR) in atopic individuals. LRA is an independent disease phenotype not progressing to atopy over time, but naturally evolving to the clinical worsening and the onset of comorbidities. Published data suggests that LRA is mediated through the mucosal synthesis of allergen-specific (s)IgE, which binds to FcϵRI on resident mast cells, and in >50% of cases traffics to the blood stream to sensitize circulating basophils. To date, 4 clinical trials have demonstrated the capacity of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) to decrease nasal, conjunctival and bronchial symptoms, to improve quality of life, to increase the threshold dose of allergen eliciting respiratory symptoms, and to induce serum sIgG4 in LRA individuals. Collectively, these data indicate that local allergy is a relevant disease mechanisms in both atopic and non-atopic patients with airway diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Almudena Testera-Montes
- Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Malaga, Malaga, Spain.,Allergy Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA and Red Tematica de Investigacion Colaborativa en Salud (RETICS) de Asma, Reacciones Adversas y Alergicas (ARADyAL), Málaga, Spain
| | - Maria Salas
- Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Malaga, Malaga, Spain.,Allergy Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA and Red Tematica de Investigacion Colaborativa en Salud (RETICS) de Asma, Reacciones Adversas y Alergicas (ARADyAL), Málaga, Spain
| | - Francisca Palomares
- Allergy Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA and Red Tematica de Investigacion Colaborativa en Salud (RETICS) de Asma, Reacciones Adversas y Alergicas (ARADyAL), Málaga, Spain
| | - Adriana Ariza
- Allergy Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA and Red Tematica de Investigacion Colaborativa en Salud (RETICS) de Asma, Reacciones Adversas y Alergicas (ARADyAL), Málaga, Spain
| | - María J Torres
- Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Malaga, Malaga, Spain.,Allergy Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA and Red Tematica de Investigacion Colaborativa en Salud (RETICS) de Asma, Reacciones Adversas y Alergicas (ARADyAL), Málaga, Spain.,Department of Medicine and Dermatology, Universidad de Malaga, Malaga, Spain.,Laboratory for Nanostructures for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Allergic Diseases, Andalusian Center for Nanomedicine and Biotechnology (BIONAND), Malaga, Spain
| | - Carmen Rondón
- Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Malaga, Malaga, Spain.,Allergy Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA and Red Tematica de Investigacion Colaborativa en Salud (RETICS) de Asma, Reacciones Adversas y Alergicas (ARADyAL), Málaga, Spain
| | - Ibon Eguiluz-Gracia
- Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Malaga, Malaga, Spain.,Allergy Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA and Red Tematica de Investigacion Colaborativa en Salud (RETICS) de Asma, Reacciones Adversas y Alergicas (ARADyAL), Málaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
114
|
Risma KA, Edwards KM, Hummell DS, Little FF, Norton AE, Stallings A, Wood RA, Milner JD. Potential mechanisms of anaphylaxis to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2021; 147:2075-2082.e2. [PMID: 33857566 PMCID: PMC8056854 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Revised: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Anaphylaxis to vaccines is historically a rare event. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic drove the need for rapid vaccine production applying a novel antigen delivery system: messenger RNA vaccines packaged in lipid nanoparticles. Unexpectedly, public vaccine administration led to a small number of severe allergic reactions, with resultant substantial public concern, especially within atopic individuals. We reviewed the constituents of the messenger RNA lipid nanoparticle vaccine and considered several contributors to these reactions: (1) contact system activation by nucleic acid, (2) complement recognition of the vaccine-activating allergic effector cells, (3) preexisting antibody recognition of polyethylene glycol, a lipid nanoparticle surface hydrophilic polymer, and (4) direct mast cell activation, coupled with potential genetic or environmental predispositions to hypersensitivity. Unfortunately, measurement of anti-polyethylene glycol antibodies in vitro is not clinically available, and the predictive value of skin testing to polyethylene glycol components as a coronavirus disease 2019 messenger RNA vaccine-specific anaphylaxis marker is unknown. Even less is known regarding the applicability of vaccine use for testing (in vitro/vivo) to ascertain pathogenesis or predict reactivity risk. Expedient and thorough research-based evaluation of patients who have suffered anaphylactic vaccine reactions and prospective clinical trials in putative at-risk individuals are needed to address these concerns during a public health crisis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly A Risma
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
| | - Kathryn M Edwards
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn
| | - Donna S Hummell
- Division of Pediatric Allergy, Immunology, and Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn
| | - Frederic F Little
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Sleep and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass
| | - Allison E Norton
- Division of Pediatric Allergy, Immunology, and Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn
| | - Amy Stallings
- Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Robert A Wood
- Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md
| | - Joshua D Milner
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
115
|
Czarnobilska E, Bulanda M, Bulanda D, Mazur M. The Influence of Air Pollution on the Development of Allergic Inflammation in the Airways in Krakow's Atopic and Non-Atopic Residents. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10112383. [PMID: 34071433 PMCID: PMC8197850 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10112383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Until now, the simultaneous influence of air pollution assessed by measuring the objective marker of exposition (1-hydroxypirene, 1-OHP) and atopy on the development of allergic airway diseases has not been studied. The aim of this study was to determine the pathomechanism of the allergic response to PM2.5 in atopic and non-atopic patients. We investigated the changes in peripheral blood basophil activity of patients after stimulation with the birch pollen allergen alone, the allergen combined with PM2.5 (BP), PM2.5 alone, a concentration of 1-OHP in urine, and a distance of residence from the main road in 30 persons. Activation by dust alone was positive for all concentrations in 83% of atopic and 75% of non-atopic assays. In the group of people with atopy, the simultaneous activation of BP gave a higher percentage of active basophils compared to the sum of activation with dust and birch pollen alone (B + P) for all concentrations. The difference between BP and B + P was 117.5 (p = 0.02) at a PM concentration of 100 μg. Such a relationship was not observed in the control group. The correlation coefficient between the distance of residence from major roads and urinary 1-OHP was 0.62. A Pearson correlation analysis of quantitative variables was performed, and positive correlation results were obtained in the atopy group between BP and 1-OH-P. Exposure to birch pollen and PM2.5 has a synergistic effect in sensitized individuals. The higher the exposure to pollutants, the higher the synergistic basophil response to the allergen and PM in atopic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ewa Czarnobilska
- Department of Clinical and Environmental Allergology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Botaniczna St. 3, 31-501 Krakow, Poland; (E.C.); (M.B.)
| | - Małgorzata Bulanda
- Department of Clinical and Environmental Allergology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Botaniczna St. 3, 31-501 Krakow, Poland; (E.C.); (M.B.)
| | - Daniel Bulanda
- Department of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza Av. 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland;
| | - Marcel Mazur
- Department of Clinical and Environmental Allergology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Botaniczna St. 3, 31-501 Krakow, Poland; (E.C.); (M.B.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +48-124-248-612
| |
Collapse
|