Allopurinol safely and effectively optimizes tioguanine metabolites in inflammatory bowel disease patients not responding to azathioprine and mercaptopurine

Optimising outcome on thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease by co-prescription of allopurinol

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Azathioprine and mercaptopurine remain first line immunomodulatory treatments for inflammatory bowel disease. Toxicity and non-response are significant issues. Co-prescription of allopurinol with reduced-dose (25-33%) azathioprine or mercaptopurine may overcome these problems. We present the outcome of co-prescription in a large single-centre cohort.

METHOD

Patients on thiopurine/allopurinol co-prescription were identified. Indication for and outcome on combination treatment were established. Blood parameters and metabolite results were compared on single agent and combination treatment. Toxicity associated with combination treatment was sought.

RESULTS

110 patients on combination treatment were identified. Clinical remission was achieved in 60/79 (76%) of patients in whom the effect of thiopurine could be studied in isolation. 20/25 patients with hepatotoxicity tolerated combination treatment and normalised their liver function tests. 24/28 patients with atypical side effects tolerated co-therapy. 13/20 non-responders responded to combination treatment. In patients started on combination treatment as first line therapy, 15/23 achieved clinical remission. Thioguanine nucleotides were significantly higher and methylated metabolites significantly lower on combination therapy. Mean cell volume was higher and total white cell and neutrophil counts lower on combination treatment. 13 adverse events occurred, including 6 specific to co-therapy (3 rash, 2 abnormal liver function tests, 1 dosing error). All were minor and self-limiting.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest published experience of the use of allopurinol to optimise outcomes on thiopurine treatment. Combination therapy permitted successful treatment of a significant number of patients who would otherwise have been labelled as thiopurine failures. A few self-limiting side effects were encountered.

Split-dose administration of thiopurine drugs: a novel and effective strategy for managing preferential 6-MMP metabolism

BACKGROUND

Mercaptopurine and azathioprine (AZA) are efficacious in treating IBD. 6-tioguanine (6-TGN) levels correlate with therapeutic efficacy, whereas high 6-methylmercaptopurine (6-MMP) levels are associated with hepatotoxicity and myelotoxicity. Some IBD patients exhibit dose-limiting preferential 6-MMP production, which may lead to undesired side effects and impact efficacy.

AIM

To review the outcomes of thiopurine split-dosing in patients with preferential 6-MMP metabolism.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 179 IBD patients treated at the Cedars-Sinai IBD Center with AZA or mercaptopurine was performed. Preferential 6-MMP metabolisers with 6-MMP levels greater than 7000 pmol/8 × 10(8) erythrocytes who underwent split-dosing were identified and assessed for biochemical and clinical responses to these dose modifications.

RESULTS

A total of 20 of 179 patients met the criteria for preferential 6-MMP metabolism and underwent thiopurine split-dosing. Dividing the total daily thiopurine dose led to a reduction in 6-MMP levels (11785 vs. 5324 pmol/8 × 10(8) erythrocytes; P < 0.0001) without negatively affecting clinical disease activity or 6-TGN levels (239 vs. 216 pmol/8 × 10(8) erythrocytes; P = N.S.) and led to resolution of 6-MMP associated side effects (elevated transaminases, leucopenia and flu-like symptoms) in all but two patients. After mean follow-up of 36 months, 12 patients remained in clinical remission on split-dose mercaptopurine. Five of the remaining eight patients escalated to anti-TNF therapy, two progressed to surgery, and one switched to tioguanine therapy.

CONCLUSION

Split-dose administration of mercaptopurine/AZA represents an alternative option in IBD patients with preferential 6-MMP metabolism who might otherwise require steroid exposure or escalation of therapy.

The pharmacogenetic basis of individual variation in thiopurine metabolism

Thiopurines are an important class of immunosuppressive therapy, which have been used in clinical practice for over 50 years. Despite this extensive experience many of the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of these drugs remain unknown. As a consequence there is often no clear explanation for the individual variation in response to treatment, both in terms of efficacy or adverse drug reactions. This review, which emphasizes practice in gastroenterology, summarizes the current understanding of thiopurine drug metabolism and highlights the role of nongenetic and genetic factors other than TPMT, which should be a focus for future research. Correlation of polymorphic variations in these genes with clinical outcomes is expected to clarify the basis for interindividual differences in thiopurine metabolism and enable a more personalized approach to therapy.

High TPMT enzyme activity does not explain drug resistance due to preferential 6-methylmercaptopurine production in patients on thiopurine treatment

BACKGROUND

Up to 20% of patients on thiopurine therapy fail to achieve adequate drug response. Many of these patients preferentially produce the toxic 6-methylmercaptopurine metabolites (6-MMP) rather than the active 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN) resulting in a high 6-MMP/6-TGN ratio (>20) and increased risk of hepatotoxicity.

AIM

To determine the prevalence of preferential 6-MMP producers and define the relationships between 6-TGN, 6-MMP and thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT).

METHODS

The database of 6-TGN, 6-MMP and TPMT measurements from patients throughout New Zealand was used to calculate patients' 6-MMP/6-TGN ratios and identify those with high (>20) or normal ratio (≤20).The TPMT enzyme activity was compared amongst the groups.

RESULTS

Of 1879 patients with TPMT, 6-TGN and 6-MMP results, 349 (19%) had a 6-MMP/6-TGN ratio >20. The mean TPMT enzyme activity was slightly lower for those with a 6-MMP/6-TGN ratio ≤20 vs. >20, which achieved statistical significance (12.2 vs. 13.2; P < 0.001). However, the distributions of TPMT enzyme activity were similar, with 97% of TPMT results falling between 5.0 and 17.6 IU/mL for both groups. In all, 17% of those with 6-MMP/6-TGN ratio ≤20 were intermediate TPMT metabolisers (TPMT 5.0-9.2 IU/mL) vs. 7% in those with a ratio >20.

CONCLUSIONS

In this patient population with measured 6-MMP/6-TGN ratios, 19% of patients were preferential 6-MMP producers. The results show that high TPMT enzyme activity is not the major reason for preferential 6-MMP production in most patients with a high metabolite ratio. This suggests that there are one or more important alternative mechanisms for preferentially producing 6-MMP.

Two brothers with skewed thiopurine metabolism in ulcerative colitis treated successfully with allopurinol and mercaptopurine dose reduction

Thiopurine therapy effectively maintains remission in inflammatory bowel disease. However, many patients are unable to achieve optimum benefits from azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine because of undesirable metabolism related to high thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) activity characterized by hepatic transaminitis secondary to increased 6-methylmercaptopurine (6-MMP) production and reduced levels of therapeutic 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN). Allopurinol can optimize this skewed metabolism. We discuss two brothers who were both diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (UC). Their disease remained active despite oral and topical mesalamines. Steroids followed by 6-mercaptopurine (MP) were unsuccessfully introduced for both patients and both were found to have high 6-MMP and low 6-TGN levels, despite normal TMPT enzyme activity, accompanied by transaminitis. Allopurinol was introduced in combination with MP dose reduction. For both brothers addition of allopurinol was associated with successful remission and optimized MP metabolites. These siblings with active UC illustrate that skewed thiopurine metabolism may occur despite normal TPMT enzyme activity and can lead to adverse events in the absence of disease control. We confirm previous data showing that addition of allopurinol can reverse this skewed metabolism, and reduce both hepatotoxicity and disease activity, but we now also introduce the concept of a family history of preferential MP metabolism as a clue to effective management for other family members.

Allopurinol enhances the activity of hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase in inflammatory bowel disease patients during low-dose thiopurine therapy: preliminary data of an ongoing series

Thiopurines are crucial in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. The phenotype of pivotal metabolic enzymes determines whether thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN) are generated in clinically sufficiently high levels. The first step in activation of thiopurine prodrugs to 6-TGN is catalysis by hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (HGPRT). Often, patients exhibit a clinically unfavorable metabolism, leading to discontinuation of conventional thiopurine therapy. The combination of allopurinol and low-dose thiopurine therapy may optimize this variant metabolism, presumably by affecting enzyme activities. We performed a prospective pharmacodynamic study to determine the effect of combination therapy on the activity of HGPRT. The activity of HGPRT and 6-TGN concentrations was measured in red blood cells during thiopurine monotherapy and after 4 weeks of combination therapy. The activity of HGPRT was also measured after 12 weeks of combination therapy. From the results, we conclude that combination therapy increases the activity of HGPRT and subsequently 6-TGN concentrations.

Optimizing 6-mercaptopurine and azathioprine therapy in the management of inflammatory bowel disease

The thiopurine drugs, 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) and azathioprine, are efficacious in the arsenal of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapy. Previous reports indicate that 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) levels correlate with therapeutic efficacy, whereas high 6-methylmercaptopurine (6-MMP) levels are associated with hepatotoxicity and myelotoxicity. Due to their complex metabolism, there is wide individual variation in patient response therein, both in achieving therapeutic drug levels as well as in developing adverse reactions. Several strategies to optimize 6-TGN while minimizing 6-MMP levels have been adopted to administer the thiopurine class of drugs to patients who otherwise would not tolerate these drugs due to side-effects. In this report, we will review different approaches to administer the thiopurine medications, including the administration of 6-mercaptopurine in those unsuccessfully treated with azathioprine; co-administration of thiopurine with allopurinol; co-administration of thiopurine with anti-tumor necrosis factor α; 6-TGN administration; desensitization trials; and split dosing of 6-MP.

Optimizing thiopurine therapy in inflammatory bowel disease

Despite recent advances, the therapeutic armamentarium for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is still limited. In addition, a step-up approach is recommended for most IBD patients. Thus, optimizing each medical therapy before switching to another drug class is the rule in clinical practice. Conventional therapies for IBD have not received the same amount of attention as biologic therapies over the last decade. However, due to their efficacy, safety, and low cost the thiopurine drugs azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine remain the backbone of therapy for IBD. Pharmacogenomic advances and increased knowledge of their metabolism are allowing dosage optimization. Herein, after describing the pharmacogenetics and pharmacokinetics of thiopurines, we will discuss how to optimize thiopurine therapy. We will then underscore the need to take into account safety issues when optimizing thiopurine treatment.

Clinical usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring of thiopurines in patients with inadequately controlled inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Circulating concentrations of 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) and 6-methyl mercaptopurine (6-MMP) are associated with thiopurine efficacy and may predict toxicity. This study aimed to examine retrospectively the utility of measuring metabolite concentrations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who had continuing symptoms despite stable thiopurine treatment.

METHODS

Concentrations of 6-TGN and 6-MMP were measured in lysates of washed red cells by high-performance liquid chromatography in peripheral blood drawn from 63 symptomatic patients with IBD (63% men, mean age 37, range 14-74 years, 67% Crohn's disease, 33% ulcerative colitis) treated with azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine. Short-term clinical outcomes were examined.

RESULTS

6-TGN concentrations weakly correlated with the thiopurine dose (r = 0.28, P = 0.08). On weight-based criteria, 50% of patients were underdosed. However, metabolite patterns suggested 7 (11%) patients were noncompliant, 18 (29%) were being underdosed, 33 (52%) were refractory to treatment with either appropriate (41%) or elevated (11%) metabolite concentrations, and 6 (10%) had a raised 6-MMP:6-TGN ratio consistent with aberrant thiopurine metabolism. The clinical outcome improved in 40 of 46 (87%) of patients in whom the course of action taken was as recommended by a metabolite-directed algorithm, while 3 of 17 patients (18%) improved where discordant actions were taken (P = 0.0001; Fisher's exact test). Fifteen patients (24%) avoided inappropriate escalation of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose-optimization or toxicity-avoidance strategies frequently result from metabolite testing in patients with inadequate efficacy from thiopurines, with evidence of better outcomes. Thiopurine metabolite testing is a potentially powerful tool for optimizing thiopurine usage in IBD.

Biotransformation of 6-thioguanine in inflammatory bowel disease patients: a comparison of oral and intravenous administration of 6-thioguanine

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Although 6-mercaptopurine and azathioprine are effective treatments in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), many patients discontinue treatment because of side effects. 6-Thioguanine (6-TG) may be an alternative rescue therapy in these intolerant patients but the pharmacokinetics of 6-TG are not fully described. Here we have measured the pharmacokinetics of the biotransformation of 6-TG into the pharmacologically active metabolites, 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN), in IBD patients.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

In 12 patients with IBD, levels of 6-TGN and activities of thiopurine S-methyltransferase, xanthine oxidase and hypoxanthine guanine-phosphoribosyl-transferase were measured in a two-stage (i.v. and p.o. administration of 0.3 mg·kg(-1) 6-TG), prospective study. Median exposure of 6-TGN in red blood cells (RBC) was expressed as the ratio of the area under the curve (AUC) per mg 6-TG after i.v. dosing and that after p.o. dosing.

KEY RESULTS

The median AUC per mg 6-TG was 1068 (p.o.) and 7184 (i.v.) pmol·h (8 × 10(8) RBC)(-1) . Median exposure of 6-TGN in RBC was 15% (9-28). Hypoxanthine guanine-phosphoribosyl-transferase activity correlated with peak 6-TGN and with AUC per mg (r= 0.7, P= 0.02 and r= 0.6, P= 0.03 respectively). Thiopurine S-methyltransferase activity was inversely related to AUC per mg (r=-0.8, P= 0.001), whereas that of xanthine oxidase was correlated with a lower peak 6-TGN (r=-0.7, P= 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The great variability of the AUC per mg for 6-TG observed after p.o. and i.v. administration of 6-TG, was partly explained by variability in activities of metabolizing enzymes. Exposure of 6-TGN was low in all patients.

Review article: the role of non-biological drugs in refractory inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Up to one-third of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) do not respond to, or are intolerant of conventional immunosuppressive drugs. Although biological agents are alternative treatments, they may not be suitable or available to some patients.

AIM

To review the evidence for use of nonbiological drugs in the treatment of patients with IBD refractory to corticosteroids or thiopurines.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using PubMed for English language publications with predetermined search criteria to identify relevant studies.

RESULTS

Published evidence from uncontrolled series and controlled clinical trials has been used to produce a practical approach relevant to clinical practice which incorporates the indication, optimal dose, and side effects of various therapies including tacrolimus, methotrexate, thalidomide, tioguanine, mycophenolate mofotil, leucocyte apheresis, nutritional therapy, antibiotics, probiotics, allopurinol, rectal acetarsol and ciclosporin in the treatment of patients with refractory ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Approaches to optimise thiopurine efficacy are also discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with IBD refractory to corticosteroids or thiopurines may respond to alternative anti-inflammatory chemical molecules, but the evidence base for many of these alternatives is limited and further trials are needed.

Predicting and preventing acute drug-induced liver injury: what's new in 2010?

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

The field of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) continues to expand in terms of global registries and with new agents added every year. Given the need to improve on our current methods of preclinical testing and monitoring for DILI during both clinical trials and in the post-approval setting, there is increasing research aimed at better understanding why injury occurs and who is most susceptible. To this end, the active pursuit of biomarkers that will predict injury prior to its occurrence and genetic testing that can identify individuals at risk of DILI continue to be at the forefront.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

While alanine aminotransferase (ALT) testing remains the workhorse of biochemical monitoring, it only detects hepatic injury after it has occurred and, therefore, is not a true predictor. The utility and shortcomings of ALT and other liver tests are reviewed along with a synopsis of several other candidate biomarkers that are being studied. In addition, we review the recent data supporting testing for genetic predisposition to DILI and how identifying clinical risk factors may translate into better means for preventing DILI.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

We update the basis on which age and gender are considered risk factors for DILI, and review the latest reports detailing the association of several candidate genes and the development of DILI in a susceptible patient. Human leukocyte antigen-B*5701 is closely linked to the hypersensitivity reaction seen with abacavir, and such screening has been successfully incorporated into HIV treatment around the globe and offers the promise that testing for other genetic markers will soon become a routine part of clinical practice. At present, candidate genes conferring specific susceptibility to DILI have been identified for a relatively few agents (e.g., flucloxacillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, ximelagatran and isoniazid), but many more are under study. Preventing DILI often comes down to avoiding the use of potentially hepatotoxic drugs in certain situations, and we review the clinical scenarios in which this is most relevant.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Given the number and range of studies aimed at identifying predictors of DILI, the focus of this review is to summarize what we consider to be the most relevant new information published on the topics of clinical and genetic factors that predispose to DILI, the use of biomarkers as predictors of acute DILI, along with advances in prevention strategies.

Allopurinol might improve response to azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine by correcting an unfavorable metabolite ratio

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Allopurinol potentiates azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) by increasing 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) metabolite concentrations. The outcome might also be improved by adding allopurinol in individuals who preferentially produce 6-methylmercaptopurine nucleotides (6-MMPN), rather than 6-TGN. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of allopurinol on concentrations of 6-MMPN and 6-TGN in individuals with a high ratio of these metabolites (>20), which is indicative of a poor thiopurine response.

METHODS

Sixteen individuals were identified who were taking azathioprine or 6-MP, and were commenced on allopurinol to improve a high 6-MMPN:TGN ratio. Metabolite concentrations were compared before and after commencing allopurinol, and markers of disease control were compared.

RESULTS

The addition of 100-300 mg allopurinol daily and thiopurine dose reduction (17-50% of the original dose) resulted in a reduction of the median (and range) 6-MMPN concentration, from 11,643 (3,365-27,832) to 221 (55-844) pmol/8×10(8) red blood cells (RBC; P=0.0005), increased 6-TGN from 162 (125-300) to 332 (135-923) pmol/8×10(8) RBC (P=0.0005), and reduced the 6-MMPN:6-TGN ratio from 63 (12-199) to 1 (0.1-4.5) (P=0.0005). There was a significant reduction in steroid dose requirements at 12 months (P=0.04) and trends for improvement in other markers of disease control. One patient developed red cell aplasia that resolved upon stopping azathioprine and allopurinol.

CONCLUSIONS

In those with a high 6-MMPN:6-TGN ratio (>20), response to thiopurine treatment might be improved by the addition of allopurinol, together with a reduced thiopurine dose and close hematological monitoring.

A prospective evaluation of the impact of allopurinol in pediatric and adult IBD patients with preferential metabolism of 6-mercaptopurine to 6-methylmercaptopurine

BACKGROUND

6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) is used for the induction and maintenance of remission of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). 6-MP is converted into 6-methylmercaptopurine (6-MMP) or 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN) intracellularly. Treatment response in IBD patients correlates with 6-TGN levels. This study prospectively evaluated the effect of allopurinol on 6-MP metabolites in adult and pediatric IBD patients. Additionally, we quantified the prevalence of preferential metabolism towards 6-MMP through a retrospective analysis of IBD patients.

METHODS

Twenty patients (10 adult; 10 pediatric) with evidence of preferential metabolism towards 6-MMP, (6-TGN<250 pmol/8×10⁸ RBCs and 6-MMP>5000 pmol/8×10⁸ RBCs) were prospectively treated with allopurinol 100 mg daily and up to 100 mg of 6-MP. 6-MP dose was adjusted after a 3-week metabolite measurement.

RESULTS

The median dose of 6-MP for adults decreased from 100mg daily (range: 37.5-150 mg) to 25mg daily (range: 12.5-50 mg). The median dose of 6-MP for pediatric patients decreased from 50 mg (range: 25-50 mg) to 10.7 mg (range: 10.7 to 21.4 mg). Mean 6-TGN levels in all subjects increased from 197.4 (± 59) to 284.8 (± 107) pmol/8×10⁸ RBCs (p=0.0005). Mean 6-MMP levels in all subjects decreased from a mean of 7719.8 (± 4716) to 404.8 (± 332) pmol/8×10⁸ RBCs (p=0.0004). There were no complications associated with allopurinol therapy. Eighty-eight (30.9%) of 285 IBD patients had evidence of preferential metabolism towards 6-MMP. The proportion of preferential metabolism was equal in adults and pediatric patients.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that the addition of allopurinol safely shifts metabolite production in both adult and pediatric IBD patients and that there is a high prevalence of preferential metabolism towards 6-MMP among IBD patients.

Combination of thiopurines and allopurinol: adverse events and clinical benefit in IBD

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Allopurinol has been presented as a safe and effective adjunct to thiopurine therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to determine the rate of infectious complications and clinical successes with a combination of thiopurine/allopurinol in IBD, and to identify which variables predict 6-thioguanine, 6-methylmercaptopurine, and white blood cell levels. Additionally we aimed to identify which variables predict complications.

METHODS

A retrospective database search identified patients with inflammatory bowel disease on both thiopurines and allopurinol. Regression modeling was used to identify which variables predicted metabolite levels, white blood cell levels, and complications.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven subjects were found, with 20 treated intentionally and 7 inadvertently after a concurrent gout diagnosis. Thirteen of 20 patients had a major clinical improvement and 7 of 16 stopped steroids. Five infectious complications occurred. These included 2 cases of shingles, and one each of PCP, EBV, and viral meningitis. Significant predictors of metabolite levels included the dose of thiopurine and allopurinol, age, and BMI. Low white blood cell count levels were associated with increased doses, high BMI, and older age. Despite having only 5 events, there was a difference in absolute lymphocyte count between patients with and without infection (median 200 per mm³ vs 850 per mm³ respectively, p=0.0503).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunctive allopurinol therapy in shunting patients produced major clinical improvement in 48% of patients. However, a surprising number of opportunistic infections have occurred. Low absolute lymphocyte count may be a previously unrecognized indicator of risk of opportunistic infections.

New keys to maintenance treatment in ulcerative colitis

Maintenance treatment in ulcerative colitis often fails to prevent flares and long term complications. The first key to maintenance is to use effective therapy, even when patients become asymptomatic. The second key is to communicate the importance of adherence to patients, and to help them achieve long term adherence. Simplified dosing schedules are of some benefit, but the bond between patient and doctor, and the patient's belief in the efficacy of the therapy are essential. Decreased co-pays (a fixed amount paid by patients seeking care that is not reimbursed my medical insurance) have been associated with increased adherence, and incentives for patients may be a cost-effective approach to improving adherence. While the most substantial data on the association between adherence and clinical outcomes is in 5-ASAs, non-adherence can also limit the efficacy of thiopurines and biologics. The third key to maintenance treatment is monitoring and maintaining control of inflammation. Decreased histologic and endoscopic damage to the colon has been associated with decreased risk of colon cancer. The most cost-effective way to monitor smoldering inflammation is not known, but endoscopy, structured symptom indices, and biomarkers may be valuable approaches. The fourth key to maintenance treatment is optimizing immunomodulator therapy with thiopurines, and possibly methotrexate in the future. The fifth key to maintenance treatment in ulcerative colitis is maintaining biologic efficacy by avoiding low trough levels and being vigilant for subclinical inflammation and symptom recurrence at the end of dose intervals. Combination therapy with immunomodulators improves trough levels in Crohn's, and may prove to have benefits for the maintenance of biologic efficacy in ulcerative colitis.

Novel strategies in the thiopurine treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Thiopurine drugs are widely used as immunomodulatory and corticosteroid-sparing agents in inflammatory bowel disease. Despite being old drugs, a renewed research and clinical interest in their application has emerged during the last decade. The application of pharmacogenetic insights and metabolic monitoring, together with treatment strategies in combination with anti-TNFalpha-antibodies and possibilities to modulate their metabolism, has paved the way to a "modern" use of the thiopurines. These aspects are briefly overviewed herein.

Optimising use of thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease

Azathioprine (AZA) and 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) are the most widely used immunosuppressive therapies in inflammatory bowel disease. Pretreatment measurement of thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) activity is recommended and although conventional practice is to use a dose of 2 mg/kg AZA (1 mg/kg 6-MP), higher doses of 2.5 mg/kg AZA or more may be required in some patients, particularly if TPMT activity is high. Dose raising is limited by toxicity, and a robust monitoring system is mandatory. Patients with side effects to AZA may tolerate 6-MP but pancreatitis is a contraindication to switching. Metabolite monitoring is not widely available but may be useful, particularly if non-compliance is possible or where metabolite shunting to 6-methylmercaptopurine is suspected, on the basis of non-response or toxicity. It may allow dose optimisation before switching to alternative immunosuppressants. The drug appears safe in pregnancy and breast feeding. Long term duration of therapy is a balance between benefits in relation to the underlying disease extent, activity and aggressiveness, and the risk of neoplasia, particularly lymphoma.

Low-dose azathioprine or mercaptopurine in combination with allopurinol can bypass many adverse drug reactions in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

The thiopurine drugs, azathioprine and mercaptopurine (MP), are established treatments for IBD. However, therapeutic failure caused by adverse drug reactions occurs frequently.

AIM

To study combination of allopurinol with reduced-dose thiopurine in an attempt to avoid adverse drug reactions in the treatment of IBD.

METHODS

Patients with drug reactions to full-dose thiopurines were recruited for combination therapy in two IBD centres in this retrospective study. Dosing was guided by measuring thiopurine methyltransferase (for UK patients) or thioguanine nucleotides and methyl-6MP (Australian patients). Response was monitored by clinical activity indices.

RESULTS

Of 41 patients, 25 had non-hepatic and 16 had hepatitic reactions. Clinical remission was achieved in 32 patients (78%) with a median follow-up of 41 weeks (range 0.5-400). Patients who did not respond to combination therapy tended to fail early with the same adverse reaction. The relative risk of having an adverse reaction with methyl-6MP in the top interquartile range was 2.7 (1.3-28) times that with methyl-6MP in the lower three quartiles (95% confidence interval).

CONCLUSION

The combined experience from our centres is the largest reported experience of this combination therapy strategy in IBD, and the first to provide evidence for benefit in thiopurine and allopurinol co-therapy to avoid non-hepatitic adverse drug reactions.

Characterisation and utility of thiopurine methyltransferase and thiopurine metabolite measurements in autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Corticosteroids alone or in conjunction with azathioprine (AZA) is the standard treatment in autoimmune hepatitis (AiH). Individual variations in thiopurine (TP) metabolism may affect both drug efficacy and toxicity. Our aim was to investigate the utility of thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) as well as thioguanine nucleotide (TGN) and methylthioinosine monophosphate (meTIMP) metabolite measurements with regard to clinical outcome.

METHODS

Two hundred thirty-eight patients with AiH were included in this cross-sectional study. TPMT status was assessed in all patients, while TGN and meTIMP were measured in patients with ongoing TP medication. Clinical outcome was evaluated by liver tests and the ability to withdraw steroids.

RESULTS

TPMT genotyping (n=229) revealed 207 (90.4%) wild-type and 22 heterozygous patients. One hundred forty-three patients had ongoing TP therapy with AZA (n=134) or mercaptopurine (MP; n=9); response was judged as complete response (CR) in 113 patients and partial response (PR) in 30 patients. Both TP dose (1.64 vs 1.19 mg/kg; p=0.012) and TPMT activity (14.3 vs 13.5; p=0.05) were higher in PR, resulting in similar TGN levels (PR: 121 pmol/8 x 10(8) red blood cells [RBC]; CR: 113 pmol/8 x 10(8) RBC; p=0.33) but higher meTIMP levels in PR (1350 vs 400 pmol/8 x 10(8) RBC; p=0.004). Patients able to withdraw steroids or who were using 5 mg prednisolone daily were treated with lower TP doses than patients on higher steroid doses (1.15 vs 1.18 vs 1.82 mg/kg; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

TP metabolite measurements are of clinical value in AiH patients who do not respond to standard TP treatment and for the identification of a shifted metabolism, which may demand an alternative treatment strategy.

Overview of inflammatory bowel disease in Australia in the last 50 years

Inflammatory diseases of the intestine, including Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, and celiac disease are now very common in Australia and remain major challenges for clinicians. Australian (and New Zealand) clinicians and scientists have made considerable contributions to our current understanding of these diseases over the last 50 years, including pathogenesis (such as the 'butyrate hypothesis', 'endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress', and the identification of the peptide sequences that incite celiac disease), true population epidemiology (albeit in New Zealand), precise clinical observation, new investigative tools, innovative new potential therapies, influential clinical drug trials (such as triple antibiotics for Crohn's disease), and a dietary approach with efficacy for functional gut symptoms (the low FODMAP diet). Underpinning the success has been clinical excellence and adaptation of clinicians to the changing landscape of disease severity and therapeutic options. The future is indeed bright if such trends continue.

New and emerging therapies for inflammatory bowel diseases

The inflammatory bowel diseases have undergone an explosion of discovery in the last 10 years. The overwhelming focus of this has been in genetics and immune mechanisms of disease. While the former has provided critical information on predisposing factors, the latter has resulted in a panoply of novel immune-based therapies and technologies. These range from an improved approach to the use of conventional immunomodulators, such as azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine, to commonplace availability of anti-tumor necrosis factor agents such as infliximab and adalimumab, through to small molecule inhibition of immune mediators. Unusual treatments, such as helminth infestation, stem cell transplantation, and leucocytapheresis, all derive from the burgeoning understanding of pathogenesis. Most important to our successful use of these therapies will be a fundamental understanding of the patient phenotypes and genotypes that will dictate particular treatment approaches in the future.

Thiopurines, a previously unrecognised cause for fatigue in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Active inflammatory bowel disease, anaemia, iron deficiency and depression, alone or in combination, are known contributing factors of fatigue in inflammatory bowel disease. However, in some patients, fatigue cannot be attributed to known causes. Thiopurines are not a recognized cause.

AIM

To describe the clinical scenario of a series of patients where thiopurines were the likely cause of fatigue.

METHOD

The clinical scenario of 5 patients was examined with specific reference to the temporal association of thiopurine therapy with fatigue, the effect of its withdrawal and rechallenge, and drug specificity.

RESULTS

The onset of severe fatigue was related to the introduction of azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine, rapid relief was experienced on its withdrawal in all patients, and fatigue rapidly occurred on rechallenge. The speed of onset was rapid in two patients and in the context of gradual withdrawal of moderate steroid dose, but recurred rapidly on rechallenge when not on steroids.

CONCLUSIONS

Marked fatigue is a previously unrecognized adverse effect of thiopurines. It does not appear to be drug-specific. Its onset might be masked by concurrent steroid therapy.

Long term efficacy and safety of allopurinol and azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We previously reported that IBD patients who are non-responders to thiopurines with preferential shunting of metabolites to hepatotoxic 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotides compared to 6-thioguanine nucleotides can reverse the ratio of 6-MMP/6-TGN and respond to thiopurines with the addition of allopurinol. The objective of this study is to report long term efficacy and safety, along with results for an additional 11 patients.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of patients at the University of Chicago IBD Center treated with allopurinol in addition to thiopurines.

RESULTS

Twenty five patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis were enrolled. Within the first month of therapy 6-TGN metabolite levels increased from a mean of 186.5±17.4 (SE) to 352.8±37.8 pmol/8×10(8) (p=0.0001). Over the same period 6-MMP levels decreased from a mean of 11,966±1697 to 2004±536 pmol/8×10(8) (p<0.0001). The mean daily dosage of prednisone decreased from 19.8±3.8 mg to 5.3±2.7 mg (p=0.03). Thirteen patients have a minimum of one year follow-up. Nine of these thirteen patients have continued on therapy for at least 2 years. All thirteen of these patients continue to be in clinical remission at the last follow-up visit. No patients have had evidence of sustained thrombocytopenia or abnormal liver enzymes.

CONCLUSIONS

In AZA/6-MP non-responders with increased 6-MMP/6-TGN ratios, addition of allopurinol continues to demonstrate safety and efficacy for long-term maintenance and steroid-sparing in IBD.

Novel pharmacogenetic markers for treatment outcome in azathioprine-treated inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Azathioprine (AZA) pharmacogenetics are complex and much studied. Genetic polymorphism in TPMT is known to influence treatment outcome. Xanthine oxidase/dehydrogenase (XDH) and aldehyde oxidase (AO) compete with TPMT to inactivate AZA.

AIM

To assess whether genetic polymorphism in AOX1, XDH and MOCOS (the product of which activates the essential cofactor for AO and XDH) is associated with AZA treatment outcome in IBD.

METHODS

Real-time PCR was conducted for a panel of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) in AOX1, XDH and MOCOS using TaqMan SNP genotyping assays in a prospective cohort of 192 patients receiving AZA for IBD.

RESULTS

Single nucleotide polymorphism AOX1 c.3404A > G (Asn1135Ser, rs55754655) predicted lack of AZA response (P = 0.035, OR 2.54, 95%CI 1.06-6.13) and when combined with TPMT activity, this information allowed stratification of a patient's chance of AZA response, ranging from 86% in patients where both markers were favourable to 33% where they were unfavourable (P < 0.0001). We also demonstrated a weak protective effect against adverse drug reactions (ADRs) from SNPs XDH c.837C > T (P = 0.048, OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.05-1.05) and MOCOS c.2107A > C, (P = 0.058 in recessive model, OR 0.64, 95%CI 0.36-1.15), which was stronger where they coincided (P = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

These findings have important implications for clinical practice and our understanding of AZA metabolism.

Severe hepatotoxicity with high 6-methylmercaptopurine nucleotide concentrations after thiopurine dose escalation due to low 6-thioguanine nucleotides

Azathioprine and its initial metabolite, 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), are associated with high rates of treatment cessation due to toxicity or inadequate response. Individualization of thiopurine dose based on concentrations of the active 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) metabolites can help improve outcomes with this class. Some individuals, however, preferentially metabolize thiopurine drugs to the potentially hepatotoxic 6-methylmercaptopurine nucleotide (6-MMPN) metabolites rather than the 6-TGNs. For these patients, escalation in thiopurine dose is not likely to increase 6-TGN concentrations sufficiently but may lead to a disproportionate increase in exposure to the 6-MMPNs. We present three cases in whom thiopurine dose escalation based on clinical status and low 6-TGN concentrations (100-262 pmol/8 x 10 RBC) resulted in severe hepatotoxicity (liver failure in two cases) associated with unrecognized extremely high 6-MMPN concentrations of 26,000-40,000 pmol/8 x 10 RBC. These cases illustrate a risk with thiopurine dose adjustment based on monitoring of 6-TGN metabolites without also monitoring 6-MMPN.

Initial clinical experience with allopurinol-thiopurine combination therapy in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Thiopurines are a mainstay of immunomodulator therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Despite their efficacy, some patients may have a poor response due to inability to achieve adequate levels of the active metabolite, 6-thioguanine (6-TGN). Others experience hepatotoxicity, which correlates with excessive 6-methylmercaptopurine (6-MMP) levels. Two adult studies have demonstrated successful manipulation of thiopurine metabolism with allopurinol, a xanthine oxidase inhibitor, to achieve more optimal thiopurine levels. The aim was to retrospectively characterize the utility of allopurinol to optimize thiopurine metabolite levels in pediatric IBD patients.

METHODS

Thirteen patients received allopurinol daily (100 mg in patients >or=30 kg and 50 mg <30 kg), and their thiopurine dose was simultaneously reduced to 25%-50% of the previous maintenance dose. Metabolite levels and other screening labs were checked 2-4 weeks later.

RESULTS

The mean azathioprine dose was decreased from 148.1 to 59.6 mg daily (60% of the mean original dose). The mean 6-TGN level increased from 173 to 303 pmol/8 x 10(8) red blood cell count (RBC) (P = 0.03), and the mean 6-MMP level decreased from 7888 to 2315 pmol/8 x 10(8) RBC (P < 0.001). Elevated transaminase levels improved or resolved in all patients. Two patients experienced reversible neutropenia. At the conclusion of the study 9 patients (69%) remained on combination therapy with a mean duration of follow-up of 162.8 +/- 119.2 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy successfully shunted thiopurine metabolites to a more favorable pattern. Reversible neutropenia was the most common side effect (2 patients). Long-term prospective studies are needed in this patient population.

Thiopurine hepatotoxicity in inflammatory bowel disease: the role for adding allopurinol

BACKGROUND

Immunomodulator therapy with the thiopurine analogues azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine is commonly prescribed for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Drug adverse effects and the lack of efficacy, however, commonly require withdrawal of therapy. Allopurinol, a xanthine oxidase inhibitor, was recently evaluated in its role in modifying thiopurine metabolism and improving drug efficacy in IBD.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the role and safety of allopurinol co-therapy in the setting of thiopurine hepatotoxicity and/or non-responsiveness in IBD.

METHODS

Published articles on thiopurines in the treatment of IBD were examined.

CONCLUSION

The addition of low dose allopurinol to dose-reduced thiopurine analogue seems safe but careful monitoring for adverse effects and profiling of thiopurine metabolites is essential. There is evidence of improved immunomodulator efficacy and reduced hepatotoxicity clinically but further confirmatory studies are required before more definitive treatment recommendations can be given.

Long-term outcome of using allopurinol co-therapy as a strategy for overcoming thiopurine hepatotoxicity in treating inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Hepatotoxicity results in the withdrawal of thiopurines drugs, azathioprine (AZA) and mercaptopurine (MP), in up to 10% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Our group previously demonstrated that allopurinol with AZA/ciclosporin/steroid 'triple therapy' improved renal graft survival.

AIM

To confirm the hypothesis that allopurinol may alleviate thiopurine hepatotoxicity by similar mechanisms as proposed in our renal study.

METHODS

Unselected patients with acute thiopurine hepatotoxicity were offered allopurinol co-therapy with low-dose AZA or MP. The starting AZA/MP dose was determined by thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) activity (two patients were intermediate TPMT); then this dose was reduced to 25% for allopurinol co-therapy. Response to treatment was assessed by clinical severity indices, endoscopy and blood tests.

RESULTS

Of 11 patients (three Crohn's disease, eight ulcerative colitis) treated, nine (82%) remain in long-term remission (median 42 months) with normal liver tests. One patient also successfully bypassed flu-like symptoms. Two stopped: one nausea, one abnormal liver function (stealosis on biopsy). Leucopenia occurred in two cases and resolved with minor dose reductions.

CONCLUSIONS

Allopurinol co-therapy with low-dose AZA/MP can alleviate thiopurine hepatotoxicity. It appears safe and effective for long-term use, but requires monitoring for myelotoxicity. Assessing the TPMT activity helps tailor the AZA/MP doses.

Influence of xanthine oxidase on thiopurine metabolism in Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

The thiopurines, azathioprine (AZA) and mercaptopurine are extensively used in Crohn's discase (CD). Thiopurine bioactivation can be diverted by either thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT), or by xanthine oxidase/dehydrogenase (XOD) which forms 6-thiouric acid (6TU).

AIM

To investigate whether chronic inflammation could influence small intestinal XOD activity using urinary excretion of 6TU as a surrogate marker of XOD activity.

METHODS

6-Thiouric acid excretion was compared between 32 CD patients and nine dermatology patients (control group), on AZA. Six CD patients were interesting: five with low TPMT activity (one deficient, four intermediate), and one receiving AZA/allopurinol co-therapy.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in 6TU excretion between the CD and control group. CD location, severity or surgery did not affect excretion. The TPMT-deficient patient excreted 89% of daily AZA dose as 6TU, but excretion by TPMT carriers was essentially normal. Concurrent 5-aminosalicylic acid therapy increased 6TU excretion significantly (median 32.9%), consistent with inhibiting TPMT. 6TU was undetectable in the patient on AZA/allopurinol co-therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The results refuted our hypothesis, but fitted a model where most of an oral thiopurine dose effectively escapes first-pass metabolism by gut XOD, but is heavily catabolized by TPMT. Bioavailability of thiopurines may be competitively inhibited by dietary purines.

Use of allopurinol with low-dose 6-mercaptopurine in inflammatory bowel disease to achieve optimal active metabolite levels: a review of four cases and the literature

BACKGROUND

At least one-third of patients with inflammatory bowel disease do not respond or are intolerant to therapy with 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP). A subgroup fails to attain optimal levels of 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) and instead shunts to 6-methylmercaptopurine nucleotide (6-MMPN).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted, and four patients are described who had been previously unable to achieve optimal 6-TGN metabolite levels until allopurinol was added to their treatment.

RESULTS

All four patients achieved optimal 6-TGN levels and undetectable 6-MMPN with a mean 6-MP dose of 0.49 mg/kg. Three achieved steroid-free clinical remission. Two of those three patients had normalization of liver enzymes; one patient had baseline normal liver enzymes despite an initial 6-MMPN level of 27,369 pmol/8 x 10(8) red blood cells. Two patients experienced reversible leukopenia.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination allopurinol and low-dose 6-MP is an effective means to achieve optimal metabolite levels and steroid-free clinical remission in previously refractory patients. Caution is advised.

Beyond TPMT: genetic influences on thiopurine drug responses in inflammatory bowel disease

Azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine are widely used in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, approximately 25% of IBD patients experience toxicity, and up to 10% show resistance to these thiopurine drugs. The importance of genetic variability in determining thiopurine toxicity was first recognized over 25 years ago with the discovery of the thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) polymorphism and the occurrence of azathioprine-induced myelosuppression in TPMT-deficient patients. In the intervening period, TPMT has become the foremost example of pharmacogenetics, and TPMT deficiency represents one of the few pharmacogenetic phenomena that have successfully made the transition from the research laboratory to diagnostics. While TPMT activity predicts some cases of myelosuppression, deficiency in this enzyme is neither predictive of other adverse drug reactions, nor resistance to thiopurine therapy. As myelosuppression only accounts for approximately 2.5% of adverse reactions in IBD patients, researchers are increasingly turning their attention to other enzymes involved in thiopurine metabolism to find molecular explanations for intolerance and resistance to azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine. In this review, we summarize the current state of knowledge with regards to TPMT, and also explore genetic variability, beyond TPMT, that may contribute to thiopurine response in IBD patients.

The role of xanthine oxidase in thiopurine metabolism: a case report

Azathioprine (AZA) is widely used in the treatment of autoimmune inflammatory diseases. AZA is normally rapidly and almost completely converted to 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) in the liver, which is further metabolized into a variety of pharmacologic active thiopurine metabolites. 6-MP is catabolized by xanthine oxidase (XO) to the inactive metabolite 6-thiouric acid. The authors report the case of a woman with chronic autoimmune pancreatitis unable to form active thiopurine metabolites. The 55-year-old woman presented with weight loss, progressive elevation of liver transaminases, and serum amylase. She was treated with prednisolone 30 mg/day (1 mg/kg) and AZA was increased to 75 mg/day (2.5 mg/kg); this was later increased to 150 mg/day (5 mg/kg). Despite good patient compliance, the active metabolites of AZA, 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN), and 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotides (6-MMPR) could not be detected in the erythrocytes (RBC). Subsequently, AZA was switched to high-dose 6-MP (2.5 mg/kg) and the XO inhibitor allopurinol was added. After 1 week, this combination led to a high 6-TGN level of 616 pmol/8 x 10(8) RBC and a 6-MMPR level of 1319 pmol/8 x 10(8) RBC. Three weeks after starting treatment, 6-TGN and 6-MMPR even reached toxic levels (1163 pmol/8 x 10(8) RBC and 10015 pmol/8 x 10(8) RBC, respectively) so that 6-MP treatment was discontinued. To elucidate this finding, 6-MP (1.7 mg/kg) was prescribed for 3 days without allopurinol. The woman was not able to form active thiopurine metabolites. According to the authors, this is the first report of a patient unable to form detectable active thiopurine metabolites on AZA and 6-MP therapy despite good patient compliance. High XO activity led to an inability to form detectable levels of active thiopurine metabolites 6-TGN and 6-MMPR. This finding emphasizes the important role of XO in the biotransformation of thiopurines.

Up-regulation of MRP4 and down-regulation of influx transporters in human leukemic cells with acquired resistance to 6-mercaptopurine

To investigate the mechanism of cellular resistance to 6-MP, we established a 6-MP resistant cell line (CEM-MP5) by stepwise selection of the human T-lymphoblastic leukemia cell line (CEM). CEM-MP5 cells were about 100-fold resistant to 6-MP compared with parental CEM cells. Western blot analysis demonstrated that multidrug resistant protein 4 (MRP4) was increased in CEM-MP5 cells, whereas the levels of the nucleoside transporters hENT1, hCNT2 and hCNT3 were decreased compared with those of parental CEM cells. Consistent with the operation of an efflux pump, accumulation of [14C]6-MP and/or its metabolites was reduced, and ATP-dependent efflux was increased in CEM-MP5 cells. Taken together these results showed that up-regulation of MRP4 and down-regulation of influx transporters played a major role in 6-MP resistance of CEM-MP5 cells.

Medical management of Crohn's disease

The clinical course of Crohn's disease (CD) is characterized by unpredictable phases of disease activity and quiescence. The majority of CD patients experience mild to moderate disease or are in clinical remission over significant periods during the course of their disease. These patients can be treated conservatively with 5-aminosalicylates or budesonide depending on the disease location. Those patients with more severe forms of the disease who require corticosteroids should be treated more aggressively with early introduction of immunomodulator and/or biologic therapy, which may help to prevent the complications associated with CD. It has been suggested that therapies directed at mucosal healing may favorably modify the natural history of CD. As newer, more effective medications become available and new therapeutic approaches are introduced (top-down therapy), mucosal healing, and not solely clinical remission, may well become the preferred treatment objective.

Thiopurine treatment in inflammatory bowel disease: clinical pharmacology and implication of pharmacogenetically guided dosing

This review summarises clinical pharmacological aspects of thiopurines in the treatment of chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Current knowledge of pharmacogenetically guided dosing is discussed for individualisation of thiopurine therapy, particularly to avoid severe adverse effects. Both azathioprine and mercaptopurine are pro-drugs that undergo extensive metabolism. The catabolic enzyme thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) is polymorphically expressed, and currently 23 genetic variants have been described. On the basis of an excellent phenotype-genotype correlation for TPMT, genotyping has become a safe and reliable tool for determination of a patient's individual phenotype. Thiopurine-related adverse drug reactions are frequent, ranging from 5% up to 40%, in both a dose-dependent and -independent manner. IBD patients with low TPMT activity are at high risk of developing severe haematotoxicity if pharmacogenetically guided dosing is not performed. Based on several cost-benefit analyses, assessment of TPMT activity is recommended prior to thiopurine therapy in patients with IBD. The underlying mechanisms of azathioprine/mercaptopurine-related hepatotoxicity, pancreatitis and azathioprine intolerance are still unknown. Although the therapeutic response appears to be related to 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) concentrations above a threshold of 230-260 pmol per 8 x 10(8) red blood cells, at present therapeutic drug monitoring of 6-TGN can be recommended only to estimate patients' compliance.Drug-drug interactions between azathioprine/mercaptopurine and aminosalicylates, diuretics, NSAIDs, warfarin and infliximab are discussed. The concomitant use of allopurinol without dosage adjustment of azathioprine/mercaptopurine leads to clinically relevant severe haematotoxicity due to elevated thiopurine levels. Several studies indicate that thiopurine therapy in IBD during pregnancy is safe. Thus, azathioprine/mercaptopurine should not be withdrawn in strictly indicated cases of pregnant IBD patients. However, breastfeeding is contraindicated during azathioprine/mercaptopurine therapy. Use of azathioprine/mercaptopurine for induction and maintenance of remission in corticosteroid-dependent or corticosteroid-refractory IBD, particularly Crohn's disease, is evidence based. To improve response rates in thiopurine therapy of IBD, comprehensive analyses including metabolic patterns and genome-wide profiling in patients with azathioprine/mercaptopurine treatment are required to identify novel candidate genes.

[Monitoring of thiopurine methyltransferase and thiopurine metabolites to optimize azathioprine therapy in inflammatory bowel disease]

Determination of the activity of thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) and of thiopurine metabolites (6-thioguanine and 6-methylmercaptopurine nucleotides) could be useful for individualized monitoring of azathioprine (AZA) and 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) doses. TPMT activity in the general population follows a trimodal distribution, in which approximately 0.3% of the population is homozygotic for the low-activity allele. A notable correlation has been observed between the low TPMP activity genotype or phenotype and the risk of myelotoxicity. Patients with a high TPMT activity genotype or homozygous phenotype should receive immunosuppressive doses that have clearly been demonstrated to be effective. In contrast, in patients with a low TPMT activity genotype or homozygous phenotype, the use of AZA/6-MP should be contraindicated or only very small doses should be administered. Importantly, TPMP deficiency explains only some cases of myelotoxicity and consequently periodic laboratory testing should be performed in patients receiving AZA/6-MP, even though TPMP function may be normal. Currently, the utility of routine thiopurine metabolite determinations in patients undergoing AZA/6-MP therapy has not been established and this practice should be limited to specific situations such as lack of response to thiopurine therapy or the occurrence of thiopurine-related adverse effects. Randomized trials comparing the routine strategy of AZA/6-MP dosing (based exclusively on the patient's weight) versus individualized monitoring (based on quantification of TPMP activity and/or thiopurine metabolites) are required before definitive conclusions on the most effective alternative can be drawn.