Experimental and clinical evidence for loss of effect (tolerance) during prolonged treatment with antiepileptic drugs

Clinical features associated with placebo response in refractory focal epilepsy

For clinical trial design and for clinical practice, it is of importance to assess factors associated with placebo response in patients with refractory epilepsy. We determined factors associated with placebo response in 359 adult patients with refractory focal epilepsy participating in three randomized placebo-controlled trials of the new antiepileptic drug lacosamide. At the end of the randomized 12-week maintenance period, 81 (23%) of the 359 patients randomized to placebo achieved at least a 50% seizure reduction (responders) compared to baseline. In contrast, 278 (77%) patients did not achieve a 50% seizure reduction (non-responders) compared to baseline. In multivariate analysis, five factors, which were present prior to the exposure to placebo, were found to be associated with placebo response. Higher age at study entry improved the chances of placebo response for each year [p=0.023, odds ratio (OR) 1.034 (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.005-1.063)]. In contrast, a lower chance of placebo response was seen with age at diagnosis of epilepsy of 6-20 years compared to ≤5 years [p=0.041, OR 0.475 (95% CI: 0.232-0.971)]. A history of 7 or more prior lifetime AEDs lowered the chance of achieving placebo response compared to 1-3 prior lifetime AEDs [p<0.001, OR 0.224 (95% CI: 0.101-0.493)] as did a baseline seizure frequency >10 seizures per 28 days compared to ≤5 seizures per 28 days [p=0.026, OR 0.431 (95% CI: 0.205-0.904)]. Prior epilepsy surgery lowered the likelihood of placebo response [p=0.02, OR 0.22 (95% CI: 0.062-0.785)]. We suggest that age at exposure to placebo, age at diagnosis of epilepsy, the number of prior lifetime AEDs, baseline seizure frequency and a history of epilepsy surgery appear to be associated with placebo response in adults with refractory focal epilepsy.

Ideal characteristics of an antiepileptic drug: how do these impact treatment decisions for individual patients?

Effective management of epilepsy requires a holistic approach that takes into account the needs of the individual patient. Antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment must therefore look beyond efficacy to ensure that the patient's overall health status and quality of life (QoL) are optimized. Because the primary objective of AED treatment is to control seizures over the long term, the ideal AED should, first and foremost, demonstrate sustained efficacy and favourable tolerability. In addition, it should have a broad spectrum of activity; its pharmacokinetic profile should be stable and predictable and allow the option of once-daily dosing; and it should not interact with other medications and concomitant AEDs. Because the efficacy of first-line AEDs is broadly comparable, choice of treatment should be based on the individual patient's specific clinical characteristics. In particular, the primary and secondary prevention of comorbid conditions should be taken into consideration, because this can reduce the risk of mortality and improve health outcomes and QoL. Treatment selection must also take into account the patient's particular lifestyle and priorities, to maximize the likelihood of long-term treatment adherence. Advances in genetic testing may help inform choice of treatment - not only by elucidating a patient's underlying aetiology, but also by helping to avoid unnecessary side effects. Although certain patient populations (e.g. women of childbearing potential, adolescents, the elderly) require particular consideration when choosing the most appropriate treatment, every patient's unique clinical characteristics and personal circumstances must be taken into account to ensure treatment success and optimize their QoL.

Open study of pranlukast add-on therapy in intractable partial epilepsy

Innovative treatments of epileptic seizures are needed to improve the outcome of epilepsy. We studied the effect of pranlukast on seizure outcome in patients with intractable partial epilepsy. An open study was conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy of 24-week pranlukast add-on therapy in 50 patients with intractable partial seizures. Serum concentrations of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 were determined using Biotrak Activity Assay System. Cytokines in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were measured by the BioPlex (BioRad) system and soluble TNF receptor1 (sTNFR1) in CSF was measured by the ELISA. Surface markers of lymphocytes in CSF were examined by cell-sorter. Seizure-free rate (SFR) was 13.6%, responder rate (RR) was 47.7%, and aggravation rate (AR) was 18.2% at the 13-24 week period after starting pranlukast. In patients with increased serum MMP-9 before pranlukast therapy (baseline), comparison of paired serum levels showed a significant decrease after pranlukast therapy. Baseline CSF levels of IL-1β and IL-6 were elevated in patients compared with disease controls. Of four patients with paired data, three (including a responder to pranlukast) showed decreased pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNFα), and four showed decreased sTNFR1, after pranlukast treatment, and only a responder had markedly decreased frequency of CD8+ T cells in CSF. Pranlukast reduces seizure frequencies probably by pleiotropic effects including normalization of MMP-9 in sera, reduced leakage of pro-inflammatory cytokines into CNS, and inhibition of extravasation of leucocytes from brain capillaries. Further investigations by double-blind control study and animal models are warranted.

Loss of the initial efficacy of levetiracetam in patients with refractory epilepsy

PURPOSE

The efficacy and safety of the anti-convulsive drug levetiracetam (LEV) has been well documented but few clinical studies have investigated tolerance to LEV. The aim of this study was to evaluate the loss of the initial efficacy of LEV in adult patients with refractory partial-onset seizures.

METHODS

We enrolled patients with refractory partial epilepsy who were started on add-on LEV treatment. The efficacy of LEV was evaluated every three months and the seizure frequency was decided by the average number of monthly seizures. A responder was defined as a patient with a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency from the baseline. Seizure freedom was defined as a seizure-free status from the beginning of LEV treatment to the evaluation period. Loss of the initial efficacy was defined as a shift from responder status during the first three months of LEV treatment to non-responder status during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

A total of 95 epilepsy patients were analyzed. During the first three months of LEV treatment, 50 (52.6%) of the 95 patients were responders with a ≥50% seizure reduction. Nine patients (18.0%) showed a loss of initial efficacy during the second three-month period. In contrast, only two (4.0%) of the non-responders during the first three months became responders during the next three months. However, this difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.054). Based on Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, 49.2% of the patients who initially responded to LEV treatment during the first three months were predicted to lose this response at 42 months. Loss of the initial efficacy of LEV treatment occurred mostly within 18 months.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the occurrence of tolerance is more common than late gain of efficacy of treatment although larger prospective studies would have to be carried out to prove this observation.

The role of reactive species in epileptogenesis and influence of antiepileptic drug therapy on oxidative stress

Epilepsy is considered one of the most common neurological disorders. The focus of this review is the acquired form of epilepsy, with the development process consisting of three major phases, the acute injury phase, the latency epileptogenesis phase, and the phase of spontaneous recurrent seizures. Nowadays, an increasing attention is paid to the possible interrelationship between oxidative stress resulting in disturbance of physiological signalling roles of calcium and free radicals in neuronal cells and mitochondrial dysfunction, cell damage, and epilepsy. The positive stimulation of mitochondrial calcium signals by reactive oxygen species and increased reactive oxygen species generation resulting from increased mitochondrial calcium can lead to a positive feedback loop. We propose that calcium can pose both, physiological and pathological effects of mitochondrial function, which can lead in neuronal cell death and consequent epileptic seizures. Various antiepileptic drugs may impair the endogenous antioxidative ability to prevent oxidative stress. Therefore, some antiepileptic drugs, especially from the older generation, may trigger oxygen-dependent tissue injury. The prooxidative effects of these antiepileptic drugs might lead to enhancement of seizure activity, resulting in loss of their efficacy or apparent functional tolerance and undesired adverse effects. Additionally, various reactive metabolites of antiepileptic drugs are capable of covalent binding to macromolecules which may lead to deterioration of the epileptic seizures and systemic toxicity. Since neuronal loss seems to be one of the major neurobiological abnormalities in the epileptic brain, the ability of antioxidants to attenuate seizure generation and the accompanying changes in oxidative burden, further support an important role of antioxidants as having a putative antiepileptic potential.

Clobazam : in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome

Clobazam, as with other benzodiazepines, has a long history of use in the treatment of epilepsy. More recently, it was approved in the USA as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome in patients aged ≥2 years. In the pivotal, placebo-controlled CONTAIN trial in paediatric and adult patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (n = 217 evaluable), adjunctive therapy with clobazam 5-40 mg/day for 12 weeks significantly reduced mean weekly drop seizure rates from baseline compared with adjunctive placebo (primary endpoint), with a significant dosage-dependent improvement in these rates. Results from a dosage-ranging, double-blind, multi-centre, phase II trial add further support for the efficacy of clobazam in paediatric and adult patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (n = 61 evaluable). Improvements in mean weekly drop seizure rates with adjunctive clobazam treatment in these short-term trials was maintained in an ongoing, open-label extension study, with a 91.6 % reduction in mean weekly drop seizure rates from baseline (at randomization in the initial trials) to 24 months in the overall population. Treatment with adjunctive clobazam was generally well tolerated in these clinical trials and after at least 2 years of treatment in an open-label extension study. Most adverse events were mild or moderate and similar to those typically observed with other benzodiazepines.

Levetiracetam suppresses neuronal network dysfunction and reverses synaptic and cognitive deficits in an Alzheimer's disease model

In light of the rising prevalence of Alzheimer's disease (AD), new strategies to prevent, halt, and reverse this condition are needed urgently. Perturbations of brain network activity are observed in AD patients and in conditions that increase the risk of developing AD, suggesting that aberrant network activity might contribute to AD-related cognitive decline. Human amyloid precursor protein (hAPP) transgenic mice simulate key aspects of AD, including pathologically elevated levels of amyloid-β peptides in brain, aberrant neural network activity, remodeling of hippocampal circuits, synaptic deficits, and behavioral abnormalities. Whether these alterations are linked in a causal chain remains unknown. To explore whether hAPP/amyloid-β-induced aberrant network activity contributes to synaptic and cognitive deficits, we treated hAPP mice with different antiepileptic drugs. Among the drugs tested, only levetiracetam (LEV) effectively reduced abnormal spike activity detected by electroencephalography. Chronic treatment with LEV also reversed hippocampal remodeling, behavioral abnormalities, synaptic dysfunction, and deficits in learning and memory in hAPP mice. Our findings support the hypothesis that aberrant network activity contributes causally to synaptic and cognitive deficits in hAPP mice. LEV might also help ameliorate related abnormalities in people who have or are at risk for AD.

Host factors affecting antiepileptic drug delivery-pharmacokinetic variability

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are the mainstay in the treatment of epilepsy, one of the most common serious chronic neurological disorders. AEDs display extensive pharmacological variability between and within patients, and a major determinant of differences in response to treatment is pharmacokinetic variability. Host factors affecting AED delivery may be defined as the pharmacokinetic characteristics that determine the AED delivery to the site of action, the epileptic focus. Individual differences may occur in absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion. These differences can be determined by genetic factors including gender and ethnicity, but the pharmacokinetics of AEDs can also be affected by age, specific physiological states in life, such as pregnancy, or pathological conditions including hepatic and renal insufficiency. Pharmacokinetic interactions with other drugs are another important source of variability in response to AEDs. Pharmacokinetic characteristics of the presently available AEDs are discussed in this review as well as their clinical implications.

Onset of intractability and its course over time: the Dutch study of epilepsy in childhood

PURPOSE

Intractability in epilepsy is difficult to define, and little is known about its onset, course, and duration. We investigated these aspects (as well as the occurrence of intractability) during long-term follow-up in patients with epilepsy, focusing on possible explanations for the variation in time of onset and duration of intractability.

METHODS

After diagnosis, 453 patients with childhood-onset epilepsy had a 5-year follow-up with regular visits and data collection. Ten years later they received a questionnaire with items concerning epilepsy, which was completed by 413 patients resulting in a mean follow-up of 15 years. Intractability during the first 5 years was compared with that in the last year of follow-up. Intractability was defined as having no 3-month remission during a 1-year period despite adequate medical treatment.

KEY FINDINGS

At least 12.1% of the cohort had a period of intractability during the 15-year follow-up, and 8.5% were intractable in the final year. Of the patients with idiopathic etiology 4.3% had a period of intractability versus 17.0% for those with cryptogenic, and 22.6% for those with remote symptomatic etiology (p < 0.001). Other risk factors at baseline were younger age at first seizure, generalized cryptogenic/symptomatic or localization-related symptomatic epilepsy, mental retardation, and febrile convulsions before enrollment. The cumulative risk of a period of intractability was 6.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.7-8.5) at 2 years follow-up and 8.2% (95% CI 5.4-11.0) at 5 years. The mean time to onset of intractability during the first 5 years of follow-up was 1.6 (95% CI 1.3-2.0; median 1.0) years and the mean duration of intractability during these 5 years was 3.3 (95% CI 2.8-3.8; median 3.6) years. Fifteen patients were intractable only during the first 5 years of follow-up (group A), and 19 subjects were intractable both during the first 5 years and the last year of follow-up (group B). Compared with group A, group B had shorter remission and a longer time to intractability during the first 5 years and more were intractable in the fifth year of follow-up. Sixteen other patients had a late onset of intractability after 5 years of follow-up, sometimes after long periods of remission (group C). No significant differences in baseline characteristics were found among groups A, B, and C, but slightly more children in groups B and C became mentally retarded during the follow-up. In all groups, antiepileptic drugs were of little use in preventing and ending intractability.

SIGNIFICANCE

There is a large unpredictable variation in time of onset, course, and duration of intractability, with a higher chance of final intractability after a poor course during the first 5 years of follow-up. The natural course of epilepsy probably best explains the variable course of intractability. The effect of medication seems to be minor.

Tolerance to the beneficial effects of prophylactic migraine drugs: a systematic review of causes and mechanisms

Loss of benefit of a previously effective treatment regimen, also known as tolerance, can be an important barrier to the successful preventive treatment of migraine. We undertook a systematic review of the literature to identify the prevalence and possible mechanisms of drug tolerance in migraine prophylaxis. Results demonstrate that the frequency of tolerance to prophylactic migraine treatment is unknown, but available data support an estimate that it occurs in 1-8% of patients receiving prophylaxis. Four broad types of tolerance were identified that are likely to be relevant to migraine prophylaxis. These are pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, behavioral, and cross tolerance. The mechanisms that underlie these types of tolerance determine whether their effects can be overcome or minimized. For example, certain forms of tolerance may be affected by manipulation of environmental cues associated with drug administration, by the order in which drugs are used, and by the concomitant use of other medications. Many medications used for migraine prophylaxis exert their effects through the endogenous opioid system. The implications of this finding are explored, particularly the parallels between medication overuse headache and tolerance to migraine prophylaxis. Given the many ways in which tolerance to migraine medications may develop, in some ways it is not surprising that migraine-preventive drugs stop working; it is more surprising that in many cases they do not.

Epilepsy caused by an abnormal alternative splicing with dosage effect of the SV2A gene in a chicken model

Photosensitive reflex epilepsy is caused by the combination of an individual's enhanced sensitivity with relevant light stimuli, such as stroboscopic lights or video games. This is the most common reflex epilepsy in humans; it is characterized by the photoparoxysmal response, which is an abnormal electroencephalographic reaction, and seizures triggered by intermittent light stimulation. Here, by using genetic mapping, sequencing and functional analyses, we report that a mutation in the acceptor site of the second intron of SV2A (the gene encoding synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A) is causing photosensitive reflex epilepsy in a unique vertebrate model, the Fepi chicken strain, a spontaneous model where the neurological disorder is inherited as an autosomal recessive mutation. This mutation causes an aberrant splicing event and significantly reduces the level of SV2A mRNA in homozygous carriers. Levetiracetam, a second generation antiepileptic drug, is known to bind SV2A, and SV2A knock-out mice develop seizures soon after birth and usually die within three weeks. The Fepi chicken survives to adulthood and responds to levetiracetam, suggesting that the low-level expression of SV2A in these animals is sufficient to allow survival, but does not protect against seizures. Thus, the Fepi chicken model shows that the role of the SV2A pathway in the brain is conserved between birds and mammals, in spite of a large phylogenetic distance. The Fepi model appears particularly useful for further studies of physiopathology of reflex epilepsy, in comparison with induced models of epilepsy in rodents. Consequently, SV2A is a very attractive candidate gene for analysis in the context of both mono- and polygenic generalized epilepsies in humans.

Antiepileptic drug interactions - principles and clinical implications

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are widely used as long-term adjunctive therapy or as monotherapy in epilepsy and other indications and consist of a group of drugs that are highly susceptible to drug interactions. The purpose of the present review is to focus upon clinically relevant interactions where AEDs are involved and especially on pharmacokinetic interactions. The older AEDs are susceptible to cause induction (carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone) or inhibition (valproic acid), resulting in a decrease or increase, respectively, in the serum concentration of other AEDs, as well as other drug classes (anticoagulants, oral contraceptives, antidepressants, antipsychotics, antimicrobal drugs, antineoplastic drugs, and immunosupressants). Conversely, the serum concentrations of AEDs may be increased by enzyme inhibitors among antidepressants and antipsychotics, antimicrobal drugs (as macrolides or isoniazid) and decreased by other mechanisms as induction, reduced absorption or excretion (as oral contraceptives, cimetidine, probenicid and antacides). Pharmacokinetic interactions involving newer AEDs include the enzyme inhibitors felbamate, rufinamide, and stiripentol and the inducers oxcarbazepine and topiramate. Lamotrigine is affected by these drugs, older AEDs and other drug classes as oral contraceptives. Individual AED interactions may be divided into three levels depending on the clinical consequences of alterations in serum concentrations. This approach may point to interactions of specific importance, although it should be implemented with caution, as it is not meant to oversimplify fact matters. Level 1 involves serious clinical consequences, and the combination should be avoided. Level 2 usually implies cautiousness and possible dosage adjustments, as the combination may not be possible to avoid. Level 3 refers to interactions where dosage adjustments are usually not necessary. Updated knowledge regarding drug interactions is important to predict the potential for harmful or lacking effects involving AEDs.

Pharmacogenomic association study on the role of drug metabolizing, drug transporters and drug target gene polymorphisms in drug-resistant epilepsy in a north Indian population

BACKGROUND:

In epilepsy, in spite of the best possible medications and treatment protocols, approximately one-third of the patients do not respond adequately to anti-epileptic drugs. Such interindividual variations in drug response are believed to result from genetic variations in candidate genes belonging to multiple pathways.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

In the present pharmacogenetic analysis, a total of 402 epilepsy patients were enrolled. Of them, 128 were diagnosed as multiple drug-resistant epilepsy and 274 patients were diagnosed as having drug-responsive epilepsy. We selected a total of 10 candidate gene polymorphisms belonging to three major classes, namely drug transporters, drug metabolizers and drug targets. These genetic polymorphism included CYP2C9 c.430C>T (*2 variant), CYP2C9 c.1075 A>C (*3 variant), ABCB1 c.3435C>T, ABCB1c.1236C>T, ABCB1c.2677G>T/A, SCN1A c.3184 A> G, SCN2A c.56G>A (p.R19K), GABRA1c.IVS11 + 15 A>G and GABRG2 c.588C>T. Genotyping was performed using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) methods, and each genotype was confirmed via direct DNA sequencing. The relationship between various genetic polymorphisms and responsiveness was examined using binary logistic regression by SPSS statistical analysis software.

RESULTS:

CYP2C9 c.1075 A>C polymorphism showed a marginal significant difference between drug resistance and drug-responsive patients for the AC genotype (Odds ratio [OR] = 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.32–1.00; P = 0.05). In drug transporter, ABCB1c.2677G>T/A polymorphism, allele A was associated with drug-resistant phenotype in epilepsy patients (P = 0.03, OR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.10-0.93). Similarly, the variant allele frequency of SCN2A c.56 G>A single nucleotide polymorphism was significantly higher in drug-resistant patients (P = 0.03; OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.03, 2.56). We also observed a significant difference at the genotype as well as allele frequencies of GABRA1c.IVS11 + 15 A > G polymorphism in drug-resistant patients for homozygous GG genotype (P = 0.03, OR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.05–3.23) and G allele (P = 0.02, OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.05–1.95).

CONCLUSIONS:

Our results showed that pharmacogenetic variants have important roles in epilepsy at different levels. It may be noted that multi-factorial diseases like epilepsy are also regulated by various other factors that may also be considered in the future.

Critical review of current animal models of seizures and epilepsy used in the discovery and development of new antiepileptic drugs

Animal models for seizures and epilepsy have played a fundamental role in advancing our understanding of basic mechanisms underlying ictogenesis and epileptogenesis and have been instrumental in the discovery and preclinical development of novel antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). However, there is growing concern that the efficacy of drug treatment of epilepsy has not substantially improved with the introduction of new AEDs, which, at least in part, may be due to the fact that the same simple screening models, i.e., the maximal electroshock seizure (MES) and s.c. pentylenetetrazole (PTZ) seizure tests, have been used as gatekeepers in AED discovery for >6 decades. It has been argued that these old models may identify only drugs that share characteristics with existing drugs, and are unlikely to have an effect on refractory epilepsies. Indeed, accumulating evidence with several novel AEDs, including levetiracetan, has shown that the MES and PTZ models do not identify all potential AEDs but instead may fail to discover compounds that have great potential efficacy but work through mechanisms not tested by these models. Awareness of the limitations of acute seizure models comes at a critical crossroad. Clearly, preclinical strategies of AED discovery and development need a conceptual shift that is moving away from using models that identify therapies for the symptomatic treatment of epilepsy to those that may be useful for identifying therapies that are more effective in the refractory population and that may ultimately lead to an effective cure in susceptible individuals by interfering with the processes underlying epilepsy. To realize this goal, the molecular mechanisms of the next generation of therapies must necessarily evolve to include targets that contribute to epileptogenesis and pharmacoresistance in relevant epilepsy models.

Anticonvulsant activity of BmK AS, a sodium channel site 4-specific modulator

The anticonvulsant activity of BmK AS, a sodium channel site 4-selective modulator purified from scorpion venom (Buthus martensi Karsch), was investigated in unanesthetized rats with acute pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)- and pilocarpine-induced seizures. Rats were microinjected in the CA1 region with either saline or BmK AS, followed by epileptogenic doses of PTZ or pilocarpine 30 minutes later. The anticonvulsant efficacy of BmK AS in PTZ- or pilocarpine-evoked seizure-like behavior and cortical epileptiform EEG activity was assessed. Intrahippocampal injections of BmK AS (0.05-1 μg in 1 μL) produced dose-dependent anticonvulsant activity in the PTZ model, suppressing seizure-associated behavior and reducing both the number and duration of high-amplitude, high-frequency discharges (HAFDs) on the EEG. In contrast, BmK AS did not affect the epileptiform EEG in the pilocarpine model over the same dose range, although it did increase the latency to status epilepticus onset and slightly, but significantly, reduced the seizure score. In summary, our results demonstrate that the sodium channel site 4-selective modulator BmK AS is an effective inhibitor of PTZ- but not pilocarpine-induced acute seizures. These results indicate that BmK AS may serve as a novel probe in exploring the role of different sodium channel subtypes in an epileptogenic setting and as a potential lead in developing antiepileptic drugs specifically for the therapy of sodium channel site 4-related epilepsy.

Factors determining response to antiepileptic drugs in randomized controlled trials. A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Because of the lack of head-to-head adjunctive-therapy trials of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in refractory partial epilepsy, meta-analyses of placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) represent a potentially important source of evidence to guide treatment decisions. However, such indirect comparisons raise various methodologic issues that may hamper their relevance.

METHODS

All RCTs in adult refractory partial epilepsy were analyzed to assess whether efficacy outcomes are influenced by: characteristics of patients and trials ; use of last observation carried forward (LOCF) analysis; evaluation period (entire period versus maintenance period); and year of publication. A meta-analysis of these AEDs was then performed taking these factors into consideration.

KEY FINDINGS

Sixty-three RCTs evaluating 20 AEDs were included. The following variables influenced efficacy estimates: (1) responder rates correlated positively with duration of the entire treatment period (p = 0.038); (2) response to placebo was significantly greater in the maintenance period than in the entire treatment period (p = 0.005); (3) responder rates increased over the years both for AEDs (p < 0.001) and for placebo (p = 0.001); (4) LOCF analysis overestimated responder rates for AEDs (p < 0.001) and for placebo (p = 0.001) compared with completer-based analysis, and the overestimation correlated positively with withdrawal rates (p < 0.001). A meta-analysis of available data showed large differences in efficacy ranking in relation to dose selection and type of analysis, but these were mostly nonsignificant due to statistical power limitations.

SIGNIFICANCE

Several methodologic issues hamper the relevance of indirect comparisons of AEDs in the adjunctive-therapy of refractory partial epilepsy. Some of these issues could be overcome by improved standardization in the reporting of efficacy outcomes.

Tolerance to the prophylactic effects of carbamazepine and related mood stabilizers in the treatment of bipolar disorders

Tolerance development after successful long‐term treatment of bipolar disorder is under recognized, as are ways to prevent or show its occurrence or reverse it once it has occurred. We review the clinical literature which suggests that tolerance can develop to most treatment approaches in bipolar illness and present an animal model of tolerance development to anticonvulsant effects of carbamazepine or lamotrigine on amgydala‐kindled seizures. In this model tolerance does not have a pharmacokinetic basis, but is contingent upon the drug being present in the brain at the time of amygdala stimulation. The occurrence of seizures in the absence of drug is sufficient to reverse tolerance and re‐establish anticonvulsant efficacy. Based on the model, we hypothesize that some episode‐induced compensatory adaptive changes in gene expression fail to occur in tolerant subjects and that episodes off medication re‐induce these changes and renew drug effectiveness. Approaches that slow or reverse tolerance development in the animal model are reviewed so that they can be tested for their applicability in the clinic. Criteria for assessing tolerance development are offered in the hope that this will facilitate a more systemic literature about its prevalence, prevention, and reversal. Careful longitudinal monitoring of episode occurrence is essential to understanding tolerance development in the affective disorder and its treatment.

Initial and long-term effects of cloxazolam with intractable epilepsy

Cloxazolam has been used mainly as an anxiolytic agent. The present study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of cloxazolam as an add-on antiepileptic drug in patients with intractable epilepsy. A total of 32 patients with intractable epilepsy were treated with cloxazolam: 13 with generalized epilepsy, 15 with focal epilepsy, and 4 with undetermined type of epilepsy. The initial effects were evaluated at 1 month after reaching a maintenance dose (0.3-0.5 mg/kg). The long-term effects were investigated at 2 years after reaching a maintenance dose. With cloxazolam, seizure frequency was reduced by ≥ 50% in 19/32 patients (59%) during initial therapy and in 6/23 patients (26%) during long-term therapy. Two became seizure free throughout the cloxazolam therapy. During initial therapy, 8/32 patients (25%) developed 11 episodes of adverse events during the initial therapy, including 5 with drowsiness, 3 with hyperactivity, 2 with irritability, and 1 with loss of appetite. During long-term therapy, 2/23 (9%) developed drowsiness. The mean dose of cloxazolam in patients with an effective response was 0.30 ± 0.18 mg/kg for initial therapy and 0.26 ± 0.20 mg/kg for long-term therapy. Seven of the 19 effective responders developed tolerance (37%). Cloxazolam is an effective and safe antiepileptic drug for intractable epilepsy.

SV2A in epilepsy: the plot thickens

Decreased Expression of Synaptic Vesicle Protein 2A, the Binding Site for Levetiracetam, during Epileptogenesis and Chronic Epilepsy. van Vliet EA, Aronica E, Redeker S, Boer K, Gorter JA. Epilepsia 2009;50(3):422–433. PURPOSE: We previously showed that gene expression of synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A), the binding site for the antiepileptic drug levetiracetam, is reduced during epileptogenesis in the rat. Since absence of SV2A has been associated with increased epileptogenicity, changes in expression of SV2A could have consequences for the progression of epilepsy. Therefore, we investigated hippocampal SV2A protein expression of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) patients and in rats during epileptogenesis and in the chronic epileptic phase. METHODS: SV2A immunocytochemistry and Western blot analysis were performed on the hippocampus of autopsy controls, patients that died from status epilepticus (SE), and pharmacoresistant TLE patients. In addition, in epileptic rats, SV2A expression was determined after SE during the acute, latent, and chronic epileptic phase. RESULTS: In control tissue, presynaptic SV2A was expressed in all hippocampal subfields, with strongest expression in mossy fiber terminals. SV2A positive puncta were distributed in a patchy pattern over the somata and dendrites of neurons. SV2A decreased throughout the hippocampus of TLE patients with hippocampal sclerosis (HS), compared to autopsy control, SE, and non-HS tissue. In most rats, SV2A was already decreased in the latent period especially in the inner molecular layer and stratum lucidum. Similarly as in humans, SV2A was also decreased throughout the hippocampus of chronic epileptic rats, specifically in rats with a progressive form of epilepsy. DISCUSSION: These data support previous findings that reduced expression of SV2A could contribute to the increased epileptogenicity. Whether this affects the effectiveness of levetiracetam needs to be further investigated.

Is epilepsy intractability predetermined or acquired?

How Long Does it Take for Epilepsy to Become Intractable? A Prospective Investigation Berg AT, Vickrey BG, Testa FM, Levy SR, Shinnar S, DiMario F, Smith S. Ann Neurol 2006;60:73–79.

Objective

To determine prospectively when in the course of epilepsy intractability becomes apparent.

Methods

Data are from a prospective cohort of 613 children followed for a median of 9.7 years. Epilepsy syndromes were grouped as focal, idiopathic, catastrophic, and other. Intractability was defined in two ways: (a) two drugs failed, 1 seizure/month, on average, for 18 months (stringent), and (b) failure of two drugs. Delayed intractability was defined as 3 or more years after epilepsy diagnosis.

Results

Eighty-three children (13.8%) met the stringent and 142 (23.2%) met the two-drug definition. Intractability depended on syndrome ( p < 0.0001): 26 (31.3%) children meeting stringent and 39 (27.5%) meeting the two-drug definition had delayed intractability. Intractability was delayed more often in focal than catastrophic epilepsy (stringent: 46.2 vs 14.3%, p = 0.003; two-drug: 40.3 vs 2.2%, p = 0.0001). Early remission periods preceded delayed intractability in 65.4–74.3% of cases. After becoming intractable, 20.5% subsequently entered remission and 13.3% were seizure free at last contact.

Interpretation

Intractable epilepsy may be delayed, especially in focal epilepsy. It often is preceded by a quiescent period, followed by further remissions. These findings help explain why surgically treatable epilepsies may take 20 years or longer before referral to surgery.

Cell and gene therapies for refractory epilepsy

Despite recent advances in the development of antiepileptic drugs, refractory epilepsy remains a major clinical problem affecting up to 35% of patients with partial epilepsy. Currently, there are few therapies that affect the underlying disease process. Therefore, novel therapeutic concepts are urgently needed. The recent development of experimental cell and gene therapies may offer several advantages compared to conventional systemic pharmacotherapy: (i) Specificity to underlying pathogenetic mechanisms by rational design; (ii) specificity to epileptogenic networks by focal delivery; and (iii) avoidance of side effects. A number of naturally occurring brain substances, such as GABA, adenosine, and the neuropeptides galanin and neuropeptide Y, may function as endogenous anticonvulsants and, in addition, may interact with the process of epileptogenesis. Unfortunately, the systemic application of these compounds is compromised by limited bioavailability, poor penetration of the blood-brain barrier, or the widespread systemic distribution of their respective receptors. Therefore, in recent years a new field of cell and gene-based neuropharmacology has emerged, aimed at either delivering endogenous anticonvulsant compounds by focal intracerebral transplantation of bioengineered cells (ex vivo gene therapy), or by inducing epileptogenic brain areas to produce these compounds in situ (in vivo gene therapy). In this review, recent efforts to develop GABA-, adenosine-, galanin-, and neuropeptide Y- based cell and gene therapies are discussed. The neurochemical rationales for using these compounds are discussed, the advantages of focal applications are highlighted and preclinical cell transplantation and gene therapy studies are critically evaluated. Although many promising data have been generated recently, potential problems, such as long-term therapeutic efficacy, long-term safety, and efficacy in clinically relevant animal models, need to be addressed before clinical applications can be contemplated.

Measuring outcomes of treatment with antiepileptic drugs in clinical trials

Epilepsy often requires life-long treatment with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). For clinicians to meet the challenges of patient management, data on AED performance based on clearly defined and consistently applied outcome measures are needed. Ideally, the design of AED clinical trials should be relevant to real-world settings, providing reliable, valid, and comprehensive information on efficacy, tolerability, and quality of life (QOL). Several types of outcome parameters have been employed: percent seizure reduction, responder rate based on > or =50% seizure reduction, seizure-free rate, time to first seizure, time to Nth seizure, adverse events, QOL, retention, and compliance. Each provides important information about a drug's performance. Here we define and review endpoints for measuring AED treatment success and explore the concepts of efficacy, tolerability, QOL, retention, and compliance as well as their usefulness as clinical trial endpoints.

Evolution and prospects for intracranial pharmacotherapy for refractory epilepsies: the subdural hybrid neuroprosthesis

Intracranial pharmacotherapy is a novel strategy to treat drug refractory, localization-related epilepsies not amenable to resective surgery. The common feature of the method is the use of some type of antiepileptic drug (AED) delivery device placed inside the cranium to prevent or stop focal seizures. This distinguishes it from other nonconventional methods, such as intrathecal pharmacotherapy, electrical neurostimulation, gene therapy, cell transplantation, and local cooling. AED-delivery systems comprise drug releasing polymers and neuroprosthetic devices that can deliver AEDs into the brain via intraparenchymal, ventricular, or transmeningeal routes. One such device is the subdural Hybrid Neuroprosthesis (HNP), designed to deliver AEDs, such as muscimol, into the subdural/subarachnoid space overlaying neocortical epileptogenic zones, with electrophysiological feedback from the treated tissue. The idea of intracranial pharmacotherapy and HNP treatment for epilepsy originated from multiple sources, including the advent of implanted medical devices, safety data for intracranial electrodes and catheters, evidence for the seizure-controlling efficacy of intracerebral AEDs, and further understanding of the pathophysiology of focal epilepsy. Successful introduction of intracranial pharmacotherapy into clinical practice depends on how the intertwined scientific, engineering, clinical, neurosurgical and regulatory challenges will be met to produce an effective and commercially viable device.

Drug treatment of epilepsy: options and limitations

The modern antiepileptic drug (AED) era--spanning a period of more than 150 years from the first use of bromide in 1857 to 2008--has seen the introduction into clinical practice of a diverse group of effective and safe drugs. These AEDs have provided considerable benefits for those afflicted with epilepsy of all kinds. In as many as 60-70% of newly treated patients, current AEDs lead to satisfactory control of seizures and a favorable risk-benefit balance for the great majority of patients, albeit with considerable differences in response depending on the type of seizure and epilepsy syndrome and rare serious adverse events. Unfortunately, in 20-30% of patients, epilepsy cannot be controlled. Patients with drug-resistant epilepsy often have serious comorbidity, including injury, depression, anxiety, and increased mortality. The aim of antiepileptic treatment should be to control seizures as quickly as possible with no or minimal side effects and with no negative impact on the quality of life. Improved seizure control is likely to reduce the morbidity and increased mortality associated with uncontrolled epilepsy. In this short overview, the options and the limitations of treating patients with epilepsy are briefly summarized.

Low risk of development of substance dependence for barbiturates and clobazam prescribed as antiepileptic drugs: results from a questionnaire study

There is no systematical research about the topic of dependence on antiepileptic drugs (AED) for patients with epilepsy, despite the fact that barbiturates and benzodiazepines comprise a potential risk of dependence. We hypothesize that there is no psychological substance dependence for patients with epilepsy, possibly because of their outcome expectations. The aim of the study was to examine these patients in terms of substance dependence. One hundred inpatients at the Lake Constance Epilepsy Center were asked about their experiences with AED in terms of dependence in a structured interview. We registered general statements about dependence of AED, markers for substance dependence, and outcome expectations. About 50% of the patients reported withdrawal symptoms and the development of tolerance, but less than 10% noticed loss of control and craving. Withdrawal symptoms and development of tolerance were significantly lower in a group of patients without barbiturates or clobazam versus patients with barbiturates or/and clobazam. There was no significant difference between these two groups in psychological criteria of dependence, that is, loss of control and craving. Outcome expectations of AED were clearly related to the efficacy against seizures, and only to a small amount to psychotropic effects. The study demonstrates that physiological variables of dependence are present more in patients with epilepsy with a permanent intake of barbiturates or clobazam, but psychological variables of dependence are rarely present in epileptic patients, with or without an intake of barbiturates and clobazam. These results confirm our hypothesis that substance dependence is not a major problem in benzodiazepines and barbiturates in patients with epilepsy. Outcome expectations seem to be related mainly to the anticonvulsant and not the psychotropic effect. This might be the reason for the absence of dependence.

Expression patterns of synaptic vesicle protein 2A in focal cortical dysplasia and TSC-cortical tubers

PURPOSE

Synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A), the binding site for the antiepileptic drug (AED) levetiracetam, has been shown to be involved in the control of neuronal excitability. The aim of the study was to define the expression and cell-specific distribution of SV2A in developmental focal lesions associated with medically intractable epilepsy.

METHODS

SV2A immunocytochemistry and Western blotting was performed in focal cortical dysplasia (FCD type IIB) and cortical tubers from patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC).

RESULTS

Autopsy and surgical control neocortical specimens were characterized by strong SV2A immunoreactivity throughout all cortical layers, with punctate labeling around the somata and dendrites of neurons. In FCD and cortical tuber specimens less intense, SV2A immunoreactivity was observed in the neuropil. The reduction in expression was confirmed by Western blot analysis. In both FCD and tuber specimens, clusters of punctate labeling were detected along cell borders and processes (perisomatic synapses) of dysplastic neuronal cells localized in both gray and white matter. The large majority of balloon cells in FCD, or giant cells in tubers, did not show punctate labeling around their somata. SV2A immunoreactivity was observed occasionally within the neuronal perikarya.

CONCLUSIONS

The pattern of SV2A immunoreactivity with reduced neuropil expression and altered cellular and subcellular distribution suggests a possible contribution of SV2A to the epileptogenicity of these malformations of cortical development. Knowledge of the expression pattern of SV2A in epilepsy-associated pathologies may be valuable for the evaluation of the effectiveness of AEDs targeting this protein.

Role of lamotrigine in the management of treatment-resistant bipolar II depression: a chart review

OBJECTIVES

We report the results of a retrospective, naturalistic study of lamotrigine in the management of treatment-resistant bipolar II depression.

METHODS

Hospital charts of 31 patients treated at a mood disorders clinic, who had been on lamotrigine for at least six months after failing to show an adequate response to a combination of two mood stabilizers or a mood stabilizer and an antidepressant, were reviewed using the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI) rating scale.

RESULTS

Patients were seen for an average of 19.4 months following the introduction of lamotrigine. The lamotrigine daily dose ranged from 50-400 mg (mean dose 199.2 mg) as monotherapy or in combination with a mood stabilizer, an atypical antipsychotic, or a sedative/hypnotic drug. Very much improvement was seen in 52% of patients and 32% were considered much improved.

CONCLUSIONS

These naturalistic data suggest that lamotrigine alone or in combination with other psychotropic drugs was well tolerated and effective in the management treatment-resistant bipolar II depression.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective design, small sample size, and lack of a control group.

Pharmacologically intractable epilepsy in children: diagnosis and preoperative evaluation

It is important to correctly diagnose medically intractable epilepsy in children and to identify those children whose medically refractory, localization-related seizures may be surgically remediable as soon as possible to optimize the surgical outcome. In this paper the authors review the definition of medically intractable seizures and discuss the various causes and risk factors for this disorder in children. They also outline the presurgical diagnostic evaluation process for pharmacologically intractable epilepsy in children who may be candidates for surgical treatment of localization-related seizures. The treatment of children with medically intractable epilepsy is both challenging and rewarding. Surgery has the potential of altering the natural history of epilepsy by improving or eliminating seizures in carefully selected patients.

Development of tolerance to levetiracetam in rats with chronic epilepsy

PURPOSE

Pharmacoresistance is a major problem in the treatment of epilepsy. We showed previously that pharmacoresistance, at least partially, is due to an up-regulation of the multidrug transporter (MDT) P-glycoprotein (P-gp): inhibition of P-gp improves seizure control in phenytoin-treated epileptic rats (poststatus epilepticus rat model for temporal lobe epilepsy). Since it has been suggested that levetiracetam (LEV) is no substrate for MDTs, we hypothesized that LEV would more adequately control seizures in this rat model.

METHODS

Chronic epileptic rats were treated repeatedly with LEV (2-week interval; different dosages) via continuous infusion using osmotic minipumps, 5-6 months after electrically induced status epilepticus. The anticonvulsive effects were determined by video-EEG monitoring and the concentration of LEV was measured in plasma and brain homogenates using gas chromatography.

RESULTS

LEV adequately entered the epileptic brain and dose-dependently suppressed spontaneous seizures in chronic epileptic rats for 3-4 days. Hereafter, seizure frequency increased, while LEV plasma levels did not change. Seizure behavior was less severe throughout the whole treatment. LEV did not affect seizure duration. After a withdrawal period of 2 weeks all rats initially responded again to LEV.

CONCLUSIONS

The initial seizure control by LEV supports the observation that LEV is not impeded by MDTs. However, the failure to control seizures for a longer period of time indicates the development of tolerance to this drug. This poses another problem in the treatment of this kind of epilepsy. Whether tolerance may be prevented by intermittent administration of LEV should be further investigated.

Zonisamide: review of pharmacology, clinical efficacy, tolerability, and safety

BACKGROUND

Zonisamide (ZNS), a sulphonamide derivative, is a new-generation anticonvulsant with multiple potential mechanisms that contribute to its antiepileptic efficacy and may also explain its as yet incompletely assessed utility for non-seizure disorders such as headaches, neuropathic pain, and weight loss.

OBJECTIVE

A review of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, evidence for efficacy in different seizure types and non-seizure conditions, adverse effects, and tolerability of ZNS is presented.

METHODS

A review of all manuscripts published in the English literature on ZNS was performed in preparing this manuscript.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

ZNS has a broad label for use in Japan, while the regulatory bodies in the USA and Europe have approved it for use only as an adjunctive therapy for partial seizures in adults. It has favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics, proven efficacy in seizure disorders, and is well tolerated in long-term use.

Levetiracetam in the treatment of epilepsy

Epilepsy is a common chronic disorder that requires long-term antiepileptic drug therapy. Approximately one half of patients fail the initial antiepileptic drug and about 35% are refractory to medical therapy, highlighting the continued need for more effective and better tolerated drugs. Levetiracetam is an antiepileptic drug marketed since 2000. Its novel mechanism of action is modulation of synaptic neurotransmitter release through binding to the synaptic vesicle protein SV2A in the brain. Its pharmacokinetic advantages include rapid and almost complete absorption, minimal insignificant binding to plasma protein, absence of enzyme induction, absence of interactions with other drugs, and partial metabolism outside the liver. The availability of an intravenous preparation is yet another advantage. It has been demonstrated effective as adjunctive therapy for refractory partial-onset seizures, primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures, and myoclonic seizures of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. In addition, it was found equivalent to controlled release carbamazepine as first-line therapy for partial-onset seizures, both in efficacy and tolerability. Its main adverse effects in randomized adjunctive trials in adults have been somnolence, asthenia, infection, and dizziness. In children, the behavioral adverse effects of hostility and nervousness were also noted. Levetiracetam is an important addition to the treatment of epilepsy.

Impact of CYP2C19 polymorphisms on the efficacy of clobazam therapy

Background: Clobazam-induced adverse reactions have been reported in cases with CYP2C19 defective allele(s). However, the relevance of the CYP2C19 genotypes to clobazam therapy remains to be clarified. Methods: The association between CYP2C19 genotypes and the antiepileptic and adverse effects of clobazam was retrospectively investigated in 110 Japanese subjects, in relation to clobazam and N-desmethylclobazam (N-clobazam) concentrations. Results: There were 41 (37.3%) homozygous extensive metabolizers (EMs), 44 (40.0%) heterozygous EMs, and 25 (22.7%) poor metabolizers (PMs). The response rate was significantly greater in PMs and heterozygous EMs than homozygous EMs with a gene–dose effect (65.2, 47.6 and 33.3%, respectively), and the adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) of PM versus homozygous EMs was 9.88 (2.47–39.56; p = 0.001). However, the genotypes did not affect the development of tolerance or adverse reactions, although the incidence of some adverse symptoms was insignificantly higher in PMs. The N-clobazam concentration (µg/ml) increased with the number of CYP2C19-defective alleles (0.92 ± 0.61, 2.14 ± 1.69 and 7.70 ± 6.04, respectively; p < 0.001), while the clobazam concentration was 1.5-fold greater in those with at least one variant. Conclusion: CYP2C19 genotype had an impact on the efficacy of clobazam, thus indicating that N-clobazam plays an important role in long-term clobazam therapy.

Standard antiepileptic drugs fail to block epileptiform activity in rat organotypic hippocampal slice cultures

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Earlier studies had demonstrated that tonic-clonic seizure-like events (SLEs) resembling electrographic correlates of limbic seizures in animals and humans can be induced in organotypic hippocampal slice cultures (OHSCs). We have explored OHSCs for their suitability to serve as in vitro models of limbic seizures for studying seizure mechanisms and screening new antiepileptic compounds.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

OHSCs were cultivated according to the interface method. Neuronal activity and extracellular potassium concentration were recorded under submerged conditions. SLEs were induced by lowering magnesium concentration or by applying the potassium channel blocker 4-aminopyridine. The effects of standard antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), carbamazepine, phenytoin, valproic acid, clonazepam, diazepam and phenobarbital sodium on SLEs were analysed.

KEY RESULTS

In more than 93% of OHSCs, AEDs did not prevent the induction of SLEs or stop ongoing seizure activity even when toxic concentrations were applied. This pharmacoresistance was independent of the method of seizure provocation, postnatal age at explantation (P2-P10) and cultivation time in vitro (2 months). SLEs were reversibly blocked by glutamate antagonists or the GABA(A)-agonist muscimol.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

We present a simple to establish in vitro model of tonic-clonic SLEs that is a priori pharmacoresistant and thus has an advantage over animal models of pharmacoresistant seizures in which responders and non-responders can be sorted out only after an experiment. OHSCs could be suitable for exploring mechanisms of pharmacoresistant seizures and be used for the identification of new anticonvulsive compounds eventually effective in drug refractory epilepsy.

Mechanisms of drug resistance in status epilepticus

Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) is a major medical emergency, defined as severe form of SE that does not respond to first (benzodiazepines) and second (phenytoin, phenobarbital) treatment efforts with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Understanding the mechanisms of RSE is important to prevent or reverse its development. Based on both clinical experience and data from rat models of SE, seizures that last more than 30 min become very hard to control by AEDs. Experimental studies have shown that the prolonged seizures of SE lead to progressive alterations of GABAA receptors, including reduced surface expression of these receptors by receptor trafficking, which would explain the loss of efficacy of benzodiazepines. In addition to AED target alterations, SE-induced overexpression of drug efflux transporters, such as P-glycoprotein (Pgp), in the brain may be involved in the resistance to AEDs (including phenytoin and phenobarbital) that are Pgp substrates. However, recent experiments of our group did not indicate that Pgp plays any important role in drug resistance of SE. Improved understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying AED resistance in SE will ultimately provide new treatment options for RSE.

Modifications of Antiepileptic Drugs for Improved Tolerability and Efficacy

Introduction

A large number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are available today, but they may not be satisfactory regarding clinical efficacy, tolerance, toxicity or pharmacokinetic properties. The purpose of this review is to focus upon the rationale behind the chemical modifications of several recently marketed AEDs or drugs in development and to categorize them according to the main purposes for the improvements: better efficacy or tolerability accompanied by improved pharmacokinetic properties.

Material and Method

AEDs that have been chemically modified to new derivatives during the last years are reviewed based on recent publications and PubMed-searches.

Results and Discussion

Improvement in pharmacokinetic parameters may affect both tolerability and efficacy. Modifications to improve tolerability include various valproate analogues, divided into aliphatic amides, cyclic derivatives or amino acid conjugates. Furthermore, there are the carbamazepine analogues oxcarbazepine and eslicarbazepine, the felbamate analogues fluorofelbamate and carisbamate (RWJ 33369), and the lamotrigine analogue JZP-4. The levetiracetam analogues brivaracetam and seletracetam and the derivatives of gabapentin, pregabalin and XP13512, have improved selectivity compared to their parent compounds. Other new drugs have new mechanisms of action related to GABA and glutamate receptors; the glutamate antagonists like topiramate (talampanel and NS-1209), and GABAA receptor agonists, benzodiazepine or progesterone analogues (ELB-139 and ganaxolone).

Conclusion

Further challenges for development of new AEDs include investigations of target molecules affected by pathophysiological processes and detailed structure-activity relationships with focus on stereoselectivity. These potential drugs may become of importance in future drug therapy in epilepsy and other CNS disorders.