Tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or sirolimus vs. cyclosporine with MMF in cardiac transplant patients: 1-year report

Prescription trends of immunosuppressive drugs in post-heart transplant recipients in Taiwan, 2000-2009

PURPOSE

Significantly increasing heart transplantations have been performed in Taiwan in the past decades, but the trends of maintenance immunosuppression for heart transplant recipients have not been well known. In this study, we aimed to explore the trends of maintenance immunosuppressive therapy and common complications for heart transplant recipients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed ambulatory prescriptions in 488 heart transplant recipients for the period 2000-2009. Patient complications after heart transplantation were also identified.

RESULTS

The annual number of new heart transplant recipients ranged from 18 to 68. The 5-year survival rate was 77.9%. The total number of regimens was 10 in 2000, and increased to 28 in 2009. Most prescriptions were immunosuppressive combinations (95.5%-89.5%). The majority of immunosuppressive regimens were a triple regimen: cyclosporine, mycophenolic acid and corticosteroid in 2009. Cyclosporine was a predominant calcineurin inhibitor with a decreasing trend from 73.9% to 59.1%, whereas the use of tacrolimus significantly increased from 11.9% to 38.4%. Mycophenolic acid was the most frequently used antimetabolite (60.1%-80.3%), while the use of azathioprine was reduced (21.6%-2.3%). From 2008, the launch of everolimus initiated a new era in the utilization of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors for maintenance immunosuppression.

CONCLUSIONS

Cyclosporine remained the most frequently used calcineurin inhibitors, and tacrolimus increased gradually. Mycophenolic acid was the most popular antimetabolite rather than azathioprine. The rapidly increased everolimus combined regimen may change the patterns of maintenance immunosuppression. The increasing number of combination therapies indicates an active role of everolimus and a tendency of complex tailored individual therapies.

Immunosuppression following heart transplantation: prospects and challenges

Immunosuppression after heart transplantation has significantly reduced the incidence of cellular rejection and improved patient outcomes with the routine use of calcineurin inhibitors. Antimetabolites and proliferation signal inhibitors add to the improvement in patient outcomes, particularly with respect to the reduced burden of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Patients with antibody sensitization are potentially at higher risk of postoperative complications. Sensitized patients are undergoing heart transplantation with increased frequency, in part due to the emergence of ventricular assist device use as a bridge to heart transplantation. Despite improvements in immunosuppressive therapies, many challenges face physicians and patients, which will further refine and improve care of the post-heart transplant patient.

Superior rejection profile during the first 24 months after heart transplantation under tacrolimus as baseline immunosuppressive regimen

Background

The use of tacrolimus (TAC) in patients after heart transplantation (HTX) has increased over the last few years.

Aim

In this retrospective study, we evaluated the effects of a TAC (conventional and extended-release TAC)-based immunosuppressive therapy regarding rejection profile in comparison to a cyclosporine A (CSA)-based regimen in patients after HTX.

Methods

The data of 233 patients who underwent HTX at the Heidelberg Heart Transplantation Center from May 1998 until November 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. Primary immunosuppressive therapy was changed from a CSA (n=114) to a TAC (n=119)-based regimen in February 2006 according to center routine. Follow-up period was 2 years post-HTX. Primary endpoint was time to first biopsy-proven rejection requiring therapy. In all patients, routine follow-up at the Heidelberg Heart Transplantation Center was mandatory.

Results

Multivariate risk factor analysis regarding time to first rejection episode showed no statistically significant differences regarding recipient age, donor age, recipient sex, donor sex, sex mismatch, ischemic time, and diagnosis leading to HTX between the two groups (all P= not statistically significant). Time to first biopsy-proven rejection was significantly longer in the TAC group (intention-to-treat analysis, n=233, log-rank test P<0.0001; per-protocol analysis, n=150, log-rank test P=0.0003). In patients who underwent a change of primary immunosuppression (n=49), a significantly longer time to first biopsy-proven rejection was also found in the primary TAC subgroup (log-rank test P=0.0297). Further subgroup analysis in the TAC subgroups showed no statistically significant differences in time to biopsy-proven rejection under extended-release TAC compared to conventional TAC (intention-to-treat analysis, log-rank test P=0.1736).

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that a TAC-based primary immunosuppressive therapy is superior to a CSA-based immunosuppressive regimen in patients after HTX regarding time to first biopsy-proven rejection.

Effect of low-dose tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil on renal function following liver transplantation

AIM: To determine whether low-dose tacrolimus (TAC) combined with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a safe approach to decrease the incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in liver transplantation (LT) recipients.

METHODS: We analyzed the medical records of 689 patients who underwent LT between March 1999 and December 2012 in a single Chinese center. Immunosuppression was initiated with a calcineurin inhibitor (TAC or CSA) and prednisone with or without MMF. CKD is defined by the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), estimated by an abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula, < 60 mL/min per 1.73 m² for at least 3 consecutive months after LT. Individuals with TAC trough concentrations ≤ 8 ng/mL at 3 mo after LT were defined as the low-dose group. The incidence of CKD within 5 years was compared between the TAC group and the CSA group, as well as between four subgroups (low-dose and high-dose TAC groups with or without MMF).

RESULTS: No difference regarding the occurrence of pre-LT renal dysfunction or that of post-LT rejection was found between the TAC and CSA groups or between the four subgroups. With a definition of GFR < 60 mL/min per 1.73 m², the overall incidence of CKD was significantly higher in the CSA group than in the TAC group. The incidence of CKD in the low-dose TAC + MMF group (7.7%) was significantly lower than that observed in the low-dose TAC group (15.9%), high-dose TAC group (24.6%) and high-dose TAC + MMF group (18.5%). The cumulative 1-, 3- and 5-year incidence rates of CKD were 12.7%, 14.5% and 16.7%, respectively. The cumulative 5-year survival rates were 61.7% and 82.2% in patients with or without CKD, respectively.

CONCLUSION: In LT patients, the choice of immunosuppressive therapy appears to affect renal function and patient survival.

Heart transplantation: challenges facing the field

There has been significant progress in the field of heart transplantation over the last 45 years. The 1-yr survival rates following heart transplantation have improved from 30% in the 1970s to almost 90% in the 2000s. However, there has been little change in long-term outcomes. This is mainly due to chronic rejection, malignancy, and the detrimental side effects of chronic immunosuppression. In addition, over the last decade, new challenges have arisen such as increasingly complicated recipients and antibody-mediated rejection. Most, if not all, of these obstacles to long-term survival could be prevented or ameliorated by the induction of transplant tolerance wherein the recipient's immune system is persuaded not to mount a damaging immune response against donor antigens, thus eliminating the need for chronic immunosuppression. However, the heart, as opposed to other allografts like kidneys, appears to be a tolerance-resistant organ. Understanding why organs like kidneys and livers are prone to tolerance induction, whereas others like hearts and lungs are tolerance-resistant, could aid in our attempts to achieve long-term, immunosuppression-free survival in human heart transplant recipients. It could also advance the field of pig-to-human xenotransplantation, which, if successful, would eliminate the organ shortage problem. Of course, there are alternative futures to the field of heart transplantation that may include the application of total mechanical support, stem cells, or bioengineered whole organs. Which modality will be the first to reach the ultimate goal of achieving unlimited, long-term, circulatory support with minimal risk to longevity or lifestyle is unknown, but significant progress in being made in each of these areas.

Use of mTOR inhibitors in chronic heart transplant recipients with renal failure: calcineurin-inhibitors conversion or minimization?

BACKGROUND

In the last decade, mTOR inhibitors (mTOR-is) have become the cornerstone of the calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-reduced/free regimens aimed to the preservation of post-transplant renal function. We compared utility and safety of the total replacement of calcineurin inhibitors with a mTOR-i with a strategy based on calcineurin inhibitor minimization and concomitant use of m-TOR-i.

METHODS

In a retrospective multi-center cohort of 394 maintenance cardiac recipients with renal failure (GFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), we compared 235 patients in whom CNI was replaced with a mTOR-i (sirolimus or everolimus) with 159 patients in whom mTOR-is were used to minimize CNIs. A propensity score analysis was carried out to balance between group differences.

RESULTS

Overall, after a median time of 2 years from mTOR-i initiation, between group differences for the evolution of renal function were not observed. In a multivariate adjusted model, improvement of renal function was limited to patients with mTOR-i usage within 5years after transplantation, particularly with the conversion strategy, and in those patients who could maintain mTOR-i therapy. Significant differences between strategies were not found for mortality, infection and mTOR-i withdrawal due to drug-related adverse events. However, conversion group tended to have a higher acute rejection incidence than the minimization group (p=0.07).

CONCLUSION

In terms of renal benefits, our results support an earlier use of mTOR-is, irrespective of the strategy. The selection of either a conversion or a CNI minimization protocol should be based on the clinical characteristics of the patients, particularly their rejection risk.

Tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus compared with calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression (sirolimus/mycophenolate mofetil) after heart transplantation: 5-year results

BACKGROUND

Despite improvements in immunosuppressive therapy, the most advantageous combination for cardiac transplant recipients has not been established. This randomized controlled trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 3 immunosuppressive protocols.

METHODS

Between 2003 and 2005, 78 de novo cardiac transplant recipients were randomized 2:2:1 to receive steroids and tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil (TAC/MMF; n = 34), TAC and sirolimus (TAC/SRL; n = 29), or SRL and MMF (SRL/MMF) plus anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG; n = 15). Steroids were withdrawn after 6 months.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival was 85.3% for TAC/MMF, 93.1% for TAC/SRL, and 86.7% for SRL/MMF (p = 0.31 for TAC/MMF vs TAC/SIR; p = 0.47 for TAC/MMF vs SIR/MMF and p = 0.86 for TAC/SIR vs SIR/MMF). Despite the use of ATG, patients in the SRL/MMF group revealed numerically fewer freedom from acute rejection episodes: TAC/MMF, 82.4%; TAC/SRL, 85.2%; SRL/MMF, 73.3% (p = 0.33). Mean creatinine at 5 years revealed preservation of renal function in the SRL/MMF vs the TAC/MMF group (p = 0.045): TAC/MMF, 1.70±0.91 mg/dl; TAC/SRL, 1.44±0.65 mg/dl; and SRL/MMF, 1.25±0.46 mg/dl. Freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy was improved in the SRL/MMF group (93.3%) compared with TAC/MMF (73.5%) and TAC/SRL (80.8%) groups, reaching no statistical significance. Freedom from cytomegalovirus infection was TAC/MMF, 72.2%; TAC/SRL, 89.7%; and SRL/MMF, 86.7%. There was a trend toward improved freedom from cytomegalovirus infection with TAC/SRL vs TAC/MMF (p = 0.076). More frequent discontinuations of study medication occurred in SRL-based immunosuppression protocols (TAC/SRL vs TAC/MMF, p = 0.034; SRL/MMF vs TAC/MMF, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

The 3 strategies yield no survival advantage at 5 years, with higher numeric rates of rejection and adverse effects in the calcineurin inhibitor-free arm. A trend was observed in favor of freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy and preservation of renal function in the calcineurin inhibitor-free arm. However, the clinical relevance on outcomes is unclear because only few patients were receiving the assigned treatment protocols.

Tacrolimus does not affect early wound healing in a rodent model of bowel anastomoses and abdominal wall closure

Background

Use of immunosuppressant drugs has been associated with complications in wound healing. The calcineurin inhibitor tacrolimus is thought to have a relatively low complication rate, but preclinical research has yielded contradictory data, prompting the current comprehensive study

Methods

Three groups of 33 male Wistar rats received a daily subcutaneous dose of 0,5, 2 or 5 mg/kg tacrolimus. A control group received saline. On day 0 a resection of 1 cm ileum and 1 cm colon was performed, and end-to-end anastomoses were constructed. Ten rats of each group were killed on day 3 and day 5 and the remaining animals on day 7. Both anastomoses and the wound in the abdominal wall were analyzed. Wound strength was the primary outcome parameter.

Results

Mean strength of the abdominal wall increased significantly over time in all groups (p<0.0001). Both the breaking strength and the bursting pressure of the ileum and colon anastomoses followed the same pattern. No differences were observed between control and experimental groups. In addition, no consistent differences were found between groups regarding wound hydroxyproline content and the activities of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9.

Conclusion

Tacrolimus does not affect early wound healing.

ECLS for children with late (post-discharge) rejection after heart transplantation

Rejection with acute hemodynamic compromise after OHT is rare in children, and is associated with poor survival. We retrospectively reviewed the management, course and outcome of recipients with late (following initial hospital discharge) rejection with acute hemodynamic compromise who were supported on ECLS. Of 197 consecutive children undergoing OHT (84 male; mean [SD] age 8.3 [5.7] [range 0.1-18.8 yr]) between 2/2002 and 10/2012, 187 children survived and were discharged from hospital. Mean (SD) follow-up was 5.0 (3.1) (range 0.1-10.6) yr. During follow-up, seven presented with severe hemodynamic compromise after transplantation (of whom one patient had been transplanted elsewhere). All seven children, who presented in hemodynamic collapse with poor cardiac function refractory to inotropic support, were placed on ECLS-two following in-hospital cardiac arrest. The median duration of ECLS was 6 (range 5-15) days. All survived to decannulation, with one death from overwhelming sepsis 20 days after presentation. The median (range) duration (in days) of inotropic requirement post ECLS was 11 (5-27), the median ventilation time was 8 (7-30), median ICU length of stay was 14 (10-54), and median hospitalization was 24 (19-118). In all, ventricular function normalized (FS >28%) within 10 (7-22) days. There was significant short-term morbidity; however, over a median follow-up of 5.9 (range 0.7-9.2) yr, all survivors have good functional status with no significant apparent neurological sequelae. ECLS thus appears to be a good rescue therapy for children with severe acute rejection post OHT, refractory to conventional treatment, leading to good medium-term outcome.

New directions in immunosuppression after heart transplantation

Heart transplantation has evolved into the treatment of choice for eligible patients with end-stage heart failure. Effective immunosuppression is critical to the success of this treatment, with the modern era beginning with the advent of cyclosporin A in the 1980s. In this Perspectives article, the major prospective, randomized trials of immunosuppression after heart transplantation are briefly reviewed. These trials provided the setting for the 2011 TICTAC trial, in which combined immunosuppression was compared with monotherapy. The results of the study are discussed, as are the implications of these data for future research, including the importance of frameworks, the risks and benefits of changes in immunosuppression regimen, the future of funding for such research, and the selection of appropriate end points in trials of heart transplantation. The presupposed need for multidrug immunosuppression is challenged, and the potential efficacy and benefits of monotherapy are explored.

Current strategies and future trends in immunosuppression after heart transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Current immunosuppressive drugs have provided excellent outcomes after heart transplantation. However, more patients suffer from long-term complications of these drugs. A series of prospective randomized trials has been conducted and has offered disparate results. This report reviews the challenges of immunosuppressive therapy during the past decade, describes recent reports and explores potential future trends in immunosuppressive protocols in heart transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The traditional combination of cyclosporine, azathioprine and steroids has been changed to tacrolimus (Tac) or cyclosporine in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids due to the results of several trials. The use of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in combination with Tac or cyclosporine A has not shown a clear benefit compared with MMF. All different combinations have shown some positive effects counteracted by side-effects and negative synergism of combinations. Future protocols need to be adapted according to individual patient's needs and risks.

SUMMARY

The changing population of heart transplantation patients has become older and sicker. Immunosuppression strategies should be developed for each patient based on their risk for rejection and their risk for developing important complications of immunosuppressive therapy.

Is cytomegalovirus prophylaxis dispensable in patients receiving an mTOR inhibitor-based immunosuppression? a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common opportunistic infection after solid organ transplantation. Cytomegalovirus causes increased morbidity, mortality, and reduced allograft survival. Prophylaxis may help control the virus but is associated with substantial side effects and does not completely prevent virus reactivation; relapses after cessation of the prophylaxis are frequent. Experimental and clinical data suggest that mTOR inhibitors may have an anti-CMV effect. Here, we present a meta-analysis of clinical trials after solid organ transplantation and describe potential mechanisms involved in the anti-CMV effect of mTOR-inhibitors.

METHODS

The current literature was reviewed for randomized controlled trials in solid organ transplantation comparing an mTOR-I with a non-mTOR-I (CNI based) treatment. The scientific quality of the trials was assessed by the Jadad score, the use of an effective allocation concealment (AC) and the existence of an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Cytomegalovirus incidence was assessed in studies comparing 1) an mTOR-I-based with a CNI-based immunosuppression (10 trials, n=3,100 patients) and 2) an mTOR-I/CNI combination therapy with a CNI-based immunosuppression (15 trials, n=7,100 patients).

RESULTS

In the first meta-analysis, CMV events after solid organ transplantation occurred significantly more often under CNIs (RR=2.27). The second meta-analysis comparing the mTOR-I + CNI combination with a CNI treatment in 15 trials of kidney, heart, and liver transplantation showed again a higher CMV incidence when patients received an mTOR-I free immunosuppression (RR=2.45).

CONCLUSIONS

mTOR-inhibitor treatment either alone or in combination with CNIs reduces significantly the CMV incidence after organ transplantation. With the use of an mTOR-inhibitor, CMV prophylaxis may be dispensible.

Impact of the early reduction of cyclosporine on renal function in heart transplant patients: a French randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Using reduced doses of Cyclosporine A immediately after heart transplantation in clinical trials may suggest benefits for renal function by reducing serum creatinine levels without a significant change in clinical endpoints. However, these trials were not sufficiently powered to prove clinical outcomes.

METHODS

In a prospective, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group controlled trial, 95 patients aged 18 to 65 years old, undergoing de novo heart transplantation were centrally randomised to receive either a low (130 < trough CsA concentrations <200 μg/L, n = 47) or a standard dose of Cyclosporine A (200 < trough CsA concentrations <300 μg/L, n = 48) for the three first post-transplant months along with mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids. Participants had a stable haemodynamic status, a serum creatinine level <250 μmol/L and the donors' cold ischemia time was under six hours; multiorgan transplants were excluded. The change in serum creatinine level over 12 months was used as the main criterion for renal function. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed on the 95 randomised patients and a mixed generalised linear model of covariance was applied.

RESULTS

At 12 months, the mean (± SD) creatinine value was 120.7 μmol/L (± 35.8) in the low-dose group and 132.3 μmol/L (± 49.1) in the standard-dose group (P = 0.162). Post hoc analyses suggested that patients with higher creatinine levels at baseline benefited significantly from the lower Cyclosporine A target. The number of patients with at least one rejection episode was not significantly different but one patient in the low-dose group and six in the standard-dose group required dialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with de novo cardiac transplantation, early Cyclosporine A dose reduction was not associated with renal benefit at 12 months. However, the strategy may benefit patients with high creatinine levels before transplantation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00159159.

New issues in heart transplantation for heart failure

OPINION STATEMENT

Heart transplantation is the preferred therapy for patients with end-stage heart failure with refractory symptoms despite optimal medical and device therapy. The major impediment to survival is rejection and infection in the short term and cardiac allograft vasculopathy and malignancy in the long term. Current therapies are focused on the prevention and treatment of rejection and limiting the long-term problems of cardiac allograft vasculopathy and malignancy. Advances in monitoring assays now allow better assessment of rejection and the level of immune response. This will allow clinicians, in the future, to tailor current therapies to the needs of individual heart transplant recipients to maximize benefit and minimize toxicity.

Genetic and genomic approaches to the detection of heart transplant rejection

Since Christiaan Barnard performed the first heart transplant in 1967, over 100,000 heart transplants have been performed worldwide. As was true then, rejection remains the major threat to the function and survival of the allograft. The development of the endomyocardial biopsy as a means to monitor for rejection has allowed heart transplantation to thrive as a therapy for patients with end-stage heart disease. The need for a noninvasive method of rejection surveillance led to the development of the first genetic test for allograft rejection, the AlloMap^®. In this article, after presenting the pathological and clinical features of cardiac allograft rejection, the authors discuss the development and application of gene-expression testing for the detection of cardiac allograft rejection. We then explore emerging 'omic' approaches that will be the rejection detection methods of the future.

Improving survival during heart transplantation: diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection and techniques for the prevention of graft injury

The diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has presented a challenge due to the pleiomorphic immunologic responses that represent the condition. A consensus with regard to its pathological diagnosis continues to evolve. Due to an increasing number of sensitized patients undergoing heart transplantation, its incidence appears to be on the rise and the condition is associated with worse outcomes than acute cellular rejection. Treatment of AMR is also more difficult and response to increases in conventional immunosuppression is often limited. Risk factors for AMR include the use of ventricular assist devices, prior exposure to blood products, allografts and multiparity. Detection of alloantibodies with a high specificity and sensitivity allows risk stratification of recipients at potential risk of AMR. Desensitization and AMR treatment strategies are focused on several therapeutic targets, including suppression of T and B cells and elimination or inhibition of circulating antibodies.

How to deal with presensitized candidates for heart transplantation?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With increasing utilization of assist devices and adoption of calculated panel-reactive antibody (cPRA), the number of presensitized patients being listed for heart transplantation is increasing. An effort to standardize identification and management of such patients is paramount and recently initiated in the heart transplant community. The current review describes the basic concepts of presensitization and details the most relevant work including the latest advancements in this area.

RECENT FINDINGS

More sensitive techniques in identifying presensitized patients have posed challenges in understanding the clinical relevance and implications of such testing. cPRA has been shown to benefit presensitized heart transplant patients. De-sensitization strategies have never been studied in a large clinical trial setting but a combination of plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin has been shown to be beneficial in small studies. Long-term positive outcomes of de-sensitization have been recently reported. Newer agents like alemtuzumab, bortezomib and complement inhibitors have been reported in case reports and series with promising results as de-sensitization strategy.

SUMMARY

Data specific to strategies and therapies in heart transplantation are sparse and most knowledge stems from other organ transplantation. Consensus efforts to standardize care and also advance research in this area were initiated recently with hope for improving care for these patients.

Antibody-mediated rejection in heart transplantation: case presentation with a review of current international guidelines

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) (humoral rejection) of cardiac allografts remains difficult to diagnose and treat. Interest in AMR of cardiac allografts has increased over the last decade as it has become apparent that untreated humoral rejection threatens graft and patient survival. An international and multidisciplinary consensus group has formulated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of AMR and established that identification of circulating or donor-specific antibodies is not required and that asymptomatic AMR, that is, biopsy-proven AMR without cardiac dysfunction is a real entity with worsened prognosis. Strict criteria for the diagnosis of cardiac AMR have not been firmly established, although the diagnosis relies heavily on tissue pathological findings. Therapy remains largely empirical. We review an unfortunate experience with one of our patients and summarize recommended criteria for the diagnosis of AMR and potential treatment schemes with a focus on current limitations and the need for future research and innovation.

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors slow skin carcinogenesis, but impair wound healing

BACKGROUND

Recent studies suggest that patients on mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors experience a reduction in cutaneous carcinogenesis by an estimated 50% or more compared with calcineurin inhibitors. While randomized trials are running, organ transplant recipients are frequently switched from calcineurin inhibitors to mTOR inhibitors when cutaneous carcinogenesis increases.

OBJECTIVES

To slow carcinogenesis in our patient, a heart transplant recipient with a neuropathic diabetic foot syndrome who had developed cutaneous carcinogenesis at a rate of more than 20 squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) annually.

METHODS

The patient's immunosuppression was switched from the calcineurin inhibitor ciclosporin to the mTOR inhibitor everolimus.

RESULTS

Carcinogenesis slowed to six SCC annually; however, he developed recalcitrant diabetic foot ulcers which were purely neuropathic and nonangiopathic, and a limb-threatening fistulating necrotic erysipelas of the right leg. Both sites responded poorly to antibiotic therapy, offloading and debridement. This skin fistula became chronic and some toes were at risk for minor amputation. In view of the propensity for mTOR inhibitors to impair would healing, immunosuppression was switched back to ciclosporin. All wounds healed rapidly, but skin carcinogenesis rose to former levels.

CONCLUSIONS

This case impressively illustrates the clinical dilemma for mTOR inhibitor use where benefit in carcinogenesis is counterbalanced by impairment in wound healing. Changes in immunosuppressive regimens should thus be made on an individual basis with careful consideration of the relative risks.

Do wound complications or lymphoceles occur more often in solid organ transplant recipients on mTOR inhibitors? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

mTOR inhibitors have been associated with wound complications and lymphoceles. We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare these outcomes for solid organ transplant recipients. Relevant medical databases were searched to identify RCTs in solid organ transplantation comparing mTOR inhibitors with an alternative therapy reporting on wound complications and/or lymphoceles. Methodological quality of RCTs was assessed. Pooled analyses were performed to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Thirty-seven RCTs in kidney, heart, simultaneous pancreas-kidney and liver transplantation were included. Pooled analyses showed a higher incidence of wound complications (OR 1.77, CI 1.31-2.37) and lymphoceles (OR 2.07, CI 1.62-2.65) for kidney transplant recipients on mTOR inhibitors together with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). There was also a higher incidence of wound complications (OR 3.00, CI 1.61-5.59) and lymphoceles (OR 2.13, CI 1.57-2.90) for kidney transplant recipients on mTOR inhibitors together with antimetabolites. Heart transplant patients receiving mTOR inhibitors together with CNIs also reported more wound complications (OR 1.82, CI 1.15-2.87). We found a higher incidence of wound complications and lymphoceles after kidney transplantation and a higher incidence of wound complications after heart transplantation for immunosuppressive regimens that included mTOR inhibitors from the time of transplantation.

Past, present, and future prospects for inducing donor-specific transplantation tolerance for composite tissue allotransplantation

Composite tissue allotransplantation (CTA) is among the most immunologically complex and newest transplant fields. Although the field has made considerable advances, there are still concerns that these procedures are performed to enhance quality-of-life issues and are not lifesaving procedures that restore physiologic function. Two challenges limit the widespread application of CTA; the first is chronic rejection, the most prevailing cause of organ allograft failure after transplantation; the second barrier is the numerous health complications associated with lifelong immunosuppressive therapy. Several tolerance-inducing strategies, including costimulatory blockade, T-cell depletion, mixed chimerism, and gene targeting of transplanted organs, have the potential to induce lifelong tolerance to organ allografts without chronic immunosuppression. Effective clinical tolerance protocols that improve CTA acceptance and offer an alternative to the requirement for chronic immunosuppressive therapy could be a major advance in the field. Tolerance would allow allotransplantation to provide a currently unmet need for reconstruction of large tissue defects. This article reviews the history of CTA, current challenges and complications, and offers future directions for CTA research in strategies to induce tolerance.

A prospective randomized study comparing cyclosporine versus tacrolimus combined with daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids in heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Cyclosporine (CsA) and tacrolimus (Tac) in heart transplantation (HTx) have been compared but with certain drawbacks. We compared both drugs in a prospective analysis with medium-term follow-up.

METHODS

Hundred and six patients were randomized to receive CsA or Tac (53 per group). Target levels of CsA were 200-300 ng/mL in the first six months and 100-200 ng/mL thereafter. Tac levels were 10-15 and 5-10 ng/mL, respectively. We also used daclizumab as induction and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids as maintenance therapy.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar. Survival (CsA 88.7% vs. Tac 81.1%; p = 0.493) was similar. There was a tendency for longer time to first rejection with CsA (93 ± 110 vs. 55 ± 81 d; p = 0.122). There were more rejection-free patients with Tac (39 vs. 28%; p = 0.233). CsA patients suffered more viral infections (0.41 ± 0.58 vs. 0.11 ± 0.31; p = 0.003). CsA patients developed hypertension often (64 vs. 43%; p = 0.032). Tac patients suffered more gastrointestinal complications (16 vs. 6%; p = 0.042). Renal function and the development of diabetes, dyslipidemia, or neurological complications was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Tac patients showed a tendency for longer time to first rejection, and there were more rejection-free patients with Tac and suffered fewer viral infections. Tac patients developed less hypertension and needed less drugs for its control. Renal function was similar in both groups.

Report from a consensus conference on antibody-mediated rejection in heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

The problem of AMR remains unsolved because standardized schemes for diagnosis and treatment remains contentious. Therefore, a consensus conference was organized to discuss the current status of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in heart transplantation.

METHODS

The conference included 83 participants (transplant cardiologists, surgeons, immunologists and pathologists) representing 67 heart transplant centers from North America, Europe, and Asia who all participated in smaller break-out sessions to discuss the various topics of AMR and attempt to achieve consensus.

RESULTS

A tentative pathology diagnosis of AMR was established, however, the pathologist felt that further discussion was needed prior to a formal recommendation for AMR diagnosis. One of the most important outcomes of this conference was that a clinical definition for AMR (cardiac dysfunction and/or circulating donor-specific antibody) was no longer believed to be required due to recent publications demonstrating that asymptomatic (no cardiac dysfunction) biopsy-proven AMR is associated with subsequent greater mortality and greater development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. It was also noted that donor-specific antibody is not always detected during AMR episodes as the antibody may be adhered to the donor heart. Finally, recommendations were made for the timing for specific staining of endomyocardial biopsy specimens and the frequency by which circulating antibodies should be assessed. Recommendations for management and future clinical trials were also provided.

CONCLUSIONS

The AMR Consensus Conference brought together clinicians, pathologists and immunologists to further the understanding of AMR. Progress was made toward a pathology AMR grading scale and consensus was accomplished regarding several clinical issues.

Induction treatment with monoclonal antibodies for heart transplantation

Individualization of induction therapy for heart transplantation (HT) is needed, given that only patients at significant risk for fatal rejection seem to present a favorable risk-benefit ratio. The question whether monoclonal interleukin 2 antagonists or antilymphocyte antibodies should be recommended remains unanswered. As most studies suggest that they have similar efficacy in preventing acute rejection, other variables related to safety or management costs should be taken into account. The cytokine release syndrome, associated with the use of OKT3, complicates management of HT patient. The experience in our center with 2 consecutive cohorts, treated with basiliximab (BAS) and OKT3, respectively, suggests that the use of BAS is associated, in addition to similar immunosuppressive efficacy and better safety profile than OKT3, with simpler patient management during the initial hospital stay, which could be associated with a reduction in posttransplant costs. Because few centers continue to use OKT3 as induction therapy in HT, more studies comparing cost-effectiveness of BAS vs polyclonal antilymphocyte antibodies (ATG) are needed.

Surgical wound complications after heart transplantation

Surgical wound complications are more frequent in patients undergoing heart transplantation than in other heart surgery patients. This is probably attributed to the presence of additional risk factors in these patients, such as immunosuppression, mechanical support through assist devices and generally poor health. Analyses of wound infections in heart transplantation are based on smaller patient population than those for general heart surgery, and the reported incidences vary largely. The identification of specific risk factors in heart transplant recipients to date is mainly based on retrospective case-control studies in small patient cohorts, the results are controversial, and the comparability of data is limited because of the lack of application of consistent definitions. The impact of immunosuppression and especially immunosuppression with mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors on the development of surgical wound complications has been widely discussed following reports of increased occurrence with sirolimus. However, nonheart-transplant specific risk factors should also be considered to develop risk profiles and treatment algorithms for individual patients. Data on surgical wound complications in general heart surgery patients and in heart transplant recipients are compared, the impact of modern immunosuppression reviewed, and areas for further investigation discussed.

Reduced progression of diabetic microvascular complications with islet cell transplantation compared with intensive medical therapy

BACKGROUND

The effect of islet cell transplantation (ICT) on the progression of diabetic microvascular complications is not well understood.

METHODS

We have conducted a prospective, crossover, cohort study comparing ICT with intensive medical therapy on the progression of diabetic nephropathy, retinopathy, and neuropathy.

RESULTS

The rate of decline in glomerular filtration rate is slower after ICT than on medical therapy. There was significantly more progression of retinopathy in medically treated patients than post-ICT. There was a nonsignificant trend for improved nerve conduction velocity post-ICT.

CONCLUSIONS

ICT is associated with less progression of microvascular complications than intensive medical therapy. Multicenter, randomized trials are needed to further study the role of ICT in slowing the progression of diabetic complications.