Renin angiotensin system blockade in kidney transplantation: a systematic review of the evidence

Efficacy and safety of losartan in treatment of hyperuricemia and posttransplantation erythrocytosis: results of a prospective, open, randomized, case-control study

BACKGROUND

Hyperuricemia and posttransplantation erythrocytosis (PTE) are frequent complications after kidney transplantation and are important risk factors for cardiovascular events. Losartan decreases serum uric acid and hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations and may be a useful agent for treatment of hyperuricemia and PTE.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the influence of losartan on serum creatinine (SCr), serum uric acid, and hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations in patients after kidney transplantation and to evaluate the safety profile of losartan in these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-six Han Chinese patients (43 men and 23 women; mean [SD] age, 40.45 [11.50] years) were enrolled in the study. All patients had undergone a first cadaveric donor kidney transplantation at least 3 months previously and had stable graft function with SCr concentration less than 176.8 micromol/L and Hb concentration greater than 110 g/L. The patients were divided into 2 groups (losartan group, n = 34; and control group, n = 32) according to the odevity of patient identification number. Patients in the losartan group received losartan, 50 mg/d; patients in the control group did not receive losartan. Each patient was followed up for 6 months.

RESULTS

Nine patients in the losartan group and 5 patients in the control group dropped out because of acute renal insufficiency, anemia, acute rejection, or poor compliance. The serum uric acid concentration in the losartan group continuously decreased at months 1, 2, 3, and 6 (P = .12, P = .01, P = .04, and P = .005 compared with baseline, and P = .02, P = .003, P = .02, and P = .006 compared with control), especially in the patients with hyperuricemia (P = .02, P < .001, P = .003, and P < .001 compared with baseline, and P = .02, P = .002, P = .02, and P = .002 compared with control). The Hb level in the losartan group decreased significantly at months 1, 2, 3, and 6 (P = .003, P < .001, P = .004, and P = 0.02 compared with baseline, and P = .001, P < .001, P = .001, and P = .005 compared with control), especially in patients with PTE. In patients without PTE, there was no significant decline in Hb concentration in the losartan group compared with baseline. There was no significant decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate in the losartan group.

CONCLUSIONS

Losartan may be an effective agent for treatment of hyperuricemia and PTE in Han Chinese patients after kidney transplantation. However, in some patients, losartan may not be safe.

Fibrogenesis in kidney transplantation: potential targets for prevention and therapy

Kidney allograft fibrosis results from a reactive process mediated by humoral and cellular events and the activation of transforming growth factor beta1. It is a process that involves both parenchymal and graft infiltrating cells and can lead to organ failure if injury persists or if the response to injury is excessive. In this review, we will address the role of preventive and therapeutic strategies that target kidney allograft fibrogenesis. We conclude that in addition to preventive strategies, therapies based on bone morphogenetic protein 7, hepatocyte growth factor, connective tissue growth factor, and pirfenidone have shown promising results in preclinical studies. Clinical trials are needed to examine the effect of these therapies on long-term outcomes.

VEGF signalling inhibition-induced proteinuria: Mechanisms, significance and management

Proteinuria is a dose-related side-effect occurring after inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signalling and may reflect severe glomerular damage. The inhibition of the VEGF signalling axis induces downexpression or suppression of nephrin, an important protein for the maintenance of the glomerular slit diaphragm, sometimes leading to nephritic syndrome and/or glomerular thrombotic microangiopathy, the main-associated kidney disease. A MEDLINE search was carried out using the following criteria: (1) all MEDLINE listings as of 01-01-2000 with abstracts; (2) English language; and (3) Humans. The following phrases were used to query the database: (proteinuria) AND (anti-VEGF OR VEGF inhibition OR bevacizumab OR sunitinib OR sorafenib OR VEGF Trap OR axitinib OR pazopanib OR AZ 2171). The references of each article identified were carefully reviewed for additional reference. The incidence of mild and asymptomatic proteinuria ranges from 21% up to 63%, but heavy proteinuria has been reported in up to 6.5% of renal cell carcinoma patients. Although discontinuation of anti-VEGF agent induced significant reduction, persistence of proteinuria is common. Although angiotensinconverting-enzyme inhibitors and/or angiotensin receptor blockers seem to be preferred, no specific recommendation for an antiproteinuric agent can be made in this context because there are no controlled studies addressing the subject. Periodic monitoring of urinary protein should be carried out in anti-VEGF-treated patients and patients showing proteinuria need special referral to nephrologists.

Profiling proteinuria in children after renal transplantation

Proteinuria is a common complication after renal transplantation (RTx). In adults, tubular proteinuria prevails and is associated with impaired graft survival. In the absence of studies on proteinuria profiling in transplanted children, we aimed at analyzing the types of proteinuria in transplanted children. Fifty-three children (11.8 years) were analyzed in a cross-sectional study. Morning urine was tested for total protein (PROT), albumin (ALB) and alpha-1-microglobulin (AMG). The type of proteinuria was assessed by the alpha-1-microglobulin/albumin algorithm (AAA): [AAA = AMG x 100/(AMG+ALB]. Median PROT, ALB, and AMG (in mg/mmol creatinine) were 20.0, 3.8, and 4.9, respectively. Pathological total proteinuria (>22 mg protein/mmol creatinine) was found in 47% of children (25/53). Only 20% of patients with pathological total proteinuria (5/25) had glomerular proteinuria, whereas 80% (20/25) had tubular proteinuria. Three of five children with glomerular proteinuria had chronic allograft nephropathy. Both AMG and albuminuria negatively correlated with the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (p = 0.021 and 0.003, respectively). In conclusion, tubular proteinuria was present in 80% of children post-RTx and may be associated with impaired graft function; glomerular proteinuria is associated mainly with chronic allograft nephropathy.

Increase in proteinuria >200 mg/g after late rejection is associated with poor graft survival

BACKGROUND

There is no information on the effects of proteinuria on outcomes following rejection.

METHODS

We addressed this question in a retrospective study of 925 kidney transplant recipients between January 2003 and December 2007. Selection criteria were based on (i) biopsy proven diagnosis of a first episode of acute rejection, and (ii) available data on urine protein to creatinine (UPC) ratios at baseline (lowest serum creatinine before biopsy), time of biopsy and 1 month after biopsy. We examined the effects of a change in UPC (DeltaUPC = UPC 1 month after biopsy-baseline UPC) on outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified 82 patients with both acute rejection and available data on proteinuria. Mean time (+/-SE) to acute rejection was 19 +/- 2.3 months, and patients were followed up for 38.7 +/- 2.6 months after transplant. Median DeltaUPC was 200 mg/g (95% confidence interval 0.00 to 0.300). Forty-two patients had a DeltaUPC > or =200 (high proteinuria group). Baseline characteristics were similar between high and low proteinuria groups except for more induction therapy with interleukin-2 receptor blockade in the former (71 vs. 47%, P = 0.04). Patient with DeltaUPC > or =200 had higher rates of graft loss (26 vs. 15%, P = 0.01) or combined graft loss or death (38 vs. 20%, P = 0.002 by log-rank). In univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, DeltaUPC > or =200 mg/g, sirolimus therapy 1 month after rejection and re-transplant status were significant factors associated with death-censored graft loss (hazard ratio (HR) 4.4, 14.9 and 6.2, P < or = 0.008) or combined graft loss or patient death (HR 3.8, 6.5 and 3.9, P < or = 0.03). Conclusions. An increase in proteinuria > or =200 mg/g after late acute rejection is associated with poor graft and patient outcomes. Clinical trials are needed to determine whether post-rejection anti-proteinuric strategies improve outcomes.

KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients

The 2009 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guideline on the monitoring, management, and treatment of kidney transplant recipients is intended to assist the practitioner caring for adults and children after kidney transplantation. The guideline development process followed an evidence-based approach, and management recommendations are based on systematic reviews of relevant treatment trials. Critical appraisal of the quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The guideline makes recommendations for immunosuppression, graft monitoring, as well as prevention and treatment of infection, cardiovascular disease, malignancy, and other complications that are common in kidney transplant recipients, including hematological and bone disorders. Limitations of the evidence, especially on the lack of definitive clinical outcome trials, are discussed and suggestions are provided for future research.

The renin-angiotensin system: an old, newly discovered player in immunoregulation

Clinical and experimental studies that discuss the different immune functions of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in kidney diseases were reviewed, with emphasis on studies of kidney transplantation. The RAS has been shown to affect both the innate and adaptive immune responses and has a well-established role in fibrinogenesis. Of special clinical interest is the ability of the RAS to activate the transforming growth factor beta(1) and the Smad pathways leading to fibrinogenesis. In addition to the RAS enhancing effect on the activity of T cells, several components of the RAS have also been shown to be chemotactic to macrophages, T cells, and natural killer cells. Experimental studies have found that RAS blockade decreases the histologic lesions of chronic allograft nephropathy but can enhance acute graft vasculopathy. Although the blockade of RAS has been commonly practiced to reduce posttransplantation hypertension, proteinuria, and erythrocytosis, however, its role in prolonging graft survival is not well established.

Antihypertensives for kidney transplant recipients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

In nontransplant populations, effects of different antihypertensive drug classes vary. Relative effects in kidney transplant recipients are uncertain. We performed a systematic review including random effects meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, using Cochrane Collaboration methodology. We identified 60 trials, enrolling 3802 recipients. Twenty-nine trials (2262 patients) compared calcium channel blockers (CCB) with placebo or no treatment, 10 trials (445 patients) compared angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) with placebo or no treatment, and seven studies (405 patients) compared CCB with ACEi. CCB compared with placebo or no treatment (plus additional agents in either arm as required) reduced graft loss (risk ratio [RR] 0.75, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.57-0.99) and improved glomerular filtration rate (GFR; mean difference [MD] 4.5 mL/min, 95% CI 2.2-6.7). Data on ACEi versus placebo or no treatment were inconclusive for GFR (MD -8.1 mL/min, 95% CI -18.6-2.4) and inconsistent for graft loss, precluding meta-analysis. In direct comparison with CCB, ACEi decreased GFR (MD 11.5 mL/min, 95% CI 7.2-15.8), proteinuria (MD 0.28 g/day, 95% CI 0.10-0.47), hemoglobin (MD 11.5 g/L, 95% CI 7.2-15.8), and increased hyperkalemia (RR 3.7, 95% CI 1.9-7.7). Graft loss data were inconclusive (RR 7.4, 95% CI 0.4-140). These data suggest that CCB may be preferred as first-line agents for hypertensive kidney transplant recipients.

Antihypertensive treatment for kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

In some nontransplant populations, effects of different antihypertensive drug classes vary. Relative effects in kidney transplant recipients are uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To assess comparative effects of different classes of antihypertensive agents in kidney transplant recipients.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, conference proceedings and reference lists of identified studies were searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of any antihypertensive agent applied to kidney transplant recipients for at least two weeks were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data was extracted by two investigators independently. Study quality, transplant outcomes and other patient centred outcomes were assessed using random effects meta-analysis. Risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, both with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Stratified analyses and meta-regression were used to investigate heterogeneity.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 60 studies, enrolling 3802 recipients. Twenty-nine studies (2262 participants) compared calcium channel blockers (CCB) to placebo/no treatment, 10 studies (445 participants) compared angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) to placebo/no treatment and seven studies (405 participants) compared CCB to ACEi. CCB compared to placebo/no treatment (plus additional agents in either arm as required) reduced graft loss (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.99) and improved glomerular filtration rate (GFR), (MD, 4.45 mL/min, 95% CI 2.22 to 6.68). Data on ACEi versus placebo/no treatment were inconclusive for GFR (MD -8.07 mL/min, 95% CI -18.57 to 2.43), and variable for graft loss, precluding meta-analysis. In direct comparison with CCB, ACEi decreased GFR (MD -11.48 mL/min, 95% CI -5.75 to -7.21), proteinuria (MD -0.28 g/24 h, 95% CI -0.47 to -0.10), haemoglobin (MD -12.96 g/L, 95% CI -5.72 to -10.21) and increased hyperkalaemia (RR 3.74, 95% CI 1.89 to 7.43). Graft loss data were inconclusive (RR 7.37, 95% CI 0.39 to 140.35). Other drug comparisons were compared in small numbers of participants and studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that CCB may be preferred as first line agents for hypertensive kidney transplant recipients. ACEi have some detrimental effects in kidney transplant recipients. More high quality studies reporting patient centred outcomes are required.

mToR inhibitors-induced proteinuria: mechanisms, significance, and management

Massive urinary protein excretion has been observed after conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to mammalian target of rapamycin (mToR) inhibitors, especially sirolimus, in renal transplant recipients with chronic allograft nephropathy. Because proteinuria is a major predictive factor of poor transplantation outcome, many studies focused on this adverse event during the past years. Whether proteinuria was due to sirolimus or only a consequence of calcineurin inhibitors withdrawal remained unsolved until high range proteinuria has been observed during sirolimus therapy in islet transplantation and in patients who received sirolimus de novo. Podocyte injury and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis have been related to mToR inhibition in some patients, but the pathways underlying these lesions remain hypothetic. We discuss herein the possible mechanisms and the significance of mToR blockade-induced proteinuria.

Chronic allograft nephropathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite dramatic declines in acute rejection and early graft failure, long-term outcomes after kidney transplantation have improved little during the past 25 years. Most late allograft failure is attributed to chronic allograft nephropathy, but this is a clinicopathological description and not a diagnosis, and its pathogenesis and treatment are largely unknown.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies suggest that acute rejection during the first few months, and calcineurin inhibitor toxicity thereafter, may both contribute to chronic allograft nephropathy. There is also accumulating evidence that injury from antibody-mediated rejection may play an important pathogenic role in at least some patients with chronic allograft nephropathy, particularly those with transplant glomerulopathy. Therapeutic measures, including protocols to reduce calcineurin inhibitor exposure, remain largely unproven.

SUMMARY

Understanding why so many kidney allografts fail, despite effective preventive measures for early acute rejection, is one of the most important areas of research in kidney transplantation today.

Posttransplant diabetes and hypertension: pathophysiologic insights and therapeutic rationale

New-onset diabetes after transplantation and hypertension are very common after renal transplantation and are associated with adverse graft and cardiovascular outcomes. A thorough understanding of the unique factors that operate in renal transplant recipients is essential for the proper evaluation and management of these important disorders. This review outlines the pathogenesis, diagnostic workup, and therapeutic rationale for diabetes and hypertension after transplantation.

Management of cardiovascular disease in renal transplant recipients

Cardiovascular disease is a major cause of graft loss and the leading cause of death in renal transplant recipients. Although there are robust data on the frequency of risk factors and their contributions to cardiovascular disease in this population, few trials have demonstrated the benefit of modifying these risk factors to reduce cardiovascular events. Nevertheless, it is widely accepted that the clinical acumen filtered through the best available studies in the general population be used to treat individual renal transplant recipients given their high cardiovascular mortality. Transplant task forces and the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative have created guidelines for this purpose. This review examines the data available for prevention and treatment of major risk factors contributing to cardiovascular disease in renal transplant recipients. The contribution of immunosuppressive agents to each risk factor and the evidence to support lifestyle modification as well as drug therapy are examined. Reducing cardiovascular risk factors requires an integrative approach that is best accomplished by a team of health care professionals. It creates a significant challenge but one that must be met if allograft survival is to improve.

Cardiovascular disease in transplant recipients: current and future treatment strategies

A cardiovascular disease event in a transplant recipient may be the result of a pretransplantation disease process, a direct effect of immunosuppressant medications, or the result of exposure to a variety of traditional and nontraditional risk factors after transplantation. Although the understanding of posttransplantation cardiovascular disease remains incomplete, there is evidence that the impact of posttransplantation cardiovascular disease has been decreased, through increased attention to this problem. In the absence of controlled studies to guide therapy, this review summarizes treatment of cardiovascular disease risk factors for which there is strong evidence of benefit in the nontransplantation setting, observational evidence of a similar risk in transplant recipients, and evidence that treatment can be safely administered to transplant recipients. Putative risk factors for posttransplantation cardiovascular disease for which the current level of evidence is insufficient to support specific treatment recommendations are also discussed. Potential new strategies to decrease the risk for cardiovascular disease events after transplantation in the future, including aggressive pretransplantation risk reduction, individualized treatments to prevent different types of cardiovascular disease, dedicated efforts to reduce cardiovascular disease events during transitions between dialysis and transplantation, and manipulation of immunosuppressant protocols, are also introduced.