Banff schema for grading pancreas allograft rejection: working proposal by a multi-disciplinary international consensus panel

Histologic graft assessment after clinical islet transplantation

BACKGROUND

An accurate monitoring would help understanding the fate of islet grafts after transplantation.

METHODS

This work assessed the feasibility of needle biopsy monitoring after intraportal islet transplantation (n=16), and islet graft morphology was studied with the addition of autopsy samples (n=2). Pancreas autopsy samples from two nondiabetic individuals were used as control.

RESULTS

Islet tissue was found in five needle samples (31%). Sampling success was related to size (100% sampling for the four biopsies of 1.8 cm in length or higher, P<or=0.01). Mild liver abnormalities included localized steatosis (n=8), mild nodular regenerative hyperplasia and mild portal venopathy (n=3), and hepatocyte swelling (n=2). Endocrine cell composition and distribution were similar between islet grafts and normal islets within the native pancreas. There was no or minimal immune cell infiltrate in patients on and off exogenous insulin, including two patients with ongoing negative metabolic events (increasing HbA1c or insulin requirement). The infiltrate was mainly composed of CD4- and CD8-positive cells.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that needle biopsy is feasible after clinical islet transplantation but with a limited practical value because of its low islet sampling rate using current sampling and analysis methods. Both biopsy and autopsy samples demonstrated the well-preserved islet endocrine composition after transplantation and the presence of focal areas of steatosis. Islet grafts showed no or minimal immune cell infiltration, even in the case of ongoing islet loss. On the basis of the findings, possible reasons for allograft islet loss are discussed.

C4d-positive interacinar capillaries correlates with donor-specific antibody-mediated rejection in pancreas allografts

BACKGROUND

The deposition of the complement split fragment C4d and its association with acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in pancreas transplant (PTx) is not well defined. To characterize the deposition of C4d in PTx, we analyzed 27 PTx biopsies from 18 patients transplanted between 2004 and 2007 at the University of Wisconsin.

METHODS

The presence of C4d was graded in interacinar capillaries (IAC), islets, interstitium, and small- and medium-size vessels. Sera obtained at the time or within 5 days of the biopsy were tested for antidonor-specific antibodies (DSA).

RESULTS

16 biopsies (59.26%) showed at least 5% C4d+ IAC (range 5%-90%). Of those, five biopsies (18.5%) revealed diffuse labeling (>50% C4d+ IAC) and 11 (40.74%) showed focal staining (5%-50% C4d+ IAC). C4d+ IAC (>5%) was significantly associated with the presence of strong DSA for class I or class II (P<0.018). C4d staining of the media or endothelium of small and medium-size vessels was a common finding in all biopsies without any association with DSA. Similarly, staining of islets and parenchymal interstitium was not statistically associated with AMR. The majority of patients received intravenous corticosteroid bolus and taper, with specific cases requiring thymoglobulin, IVIg, rituximab, or plasmapheresis. Forty-six percent of patients who demonstrated AMR returned to insulin therapy because of chronic graft damage and loss of C-peptide.

CONCLUSION

Our findings support the potential role of C4d labeling of PTx biopsies in the diagnosis of AMR and emphasize the staining of IAC as a valuable histologic tool for the diagnosis.

Minimization protocols in pancreas transplantation

Diagnosis of immunologic injury (acute and chronic) is much more difficult in pancreas transplants when compared with transplants of other organs. Currently, the immunosuppressive regimen for induction involves calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), antimetabolites and corticosteroids (Cs). This strong and nonspecific regimen does not take into consideration pancreas specificities (i.e. the need to avoid diabetogenic compounds). For obvious reasons, CNI might be calling for review, if permanently indicated in recipients of solitary pancreas with mild renal dysfunction. CNI as well as corticosteroids may induce hyperglycemia and contribute to differential diagnosis of a rejection process. However, in spite of the benefits accruing from withdrawal of above immunosuppressive agents, minimization or avoidance of these drugs could be dangerous and may end up with graft loss (i.e. antibody-mediated process). Long-term results of pancreas transplantation are now achieving comparable survival rates similar to the transplant of traditional organs such as kidney and liver. As a consequence, the physicians' objectives are to prolong the patient's quality of life and organ function as long as possible. Weaning strategies in regard to CNI and steroids are tested. Sirolimus, everolimus, CTLA-4 Ig, etc, are agents known to be either both nonnephrotoxic and nondiabetogenic or less so when compared with CNI. Their impact on pancreas transplantation is beginning to be evaluated. Large randomized trials in all pancreas categories, with long-term clinical and histologic results, are mandatory to establish new guidelines for immunosuppressive regimens for pancreas transplantation.