Provocation by eucapnic voluntary hyperpnoea to identify exercise induced bronchoconstriction

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness testing in athletes of the Swiss Paralympic team

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess airway hyperresponsiveness to eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation and dry powder mannitol challenge in athletes aiming to participate at the Paralympic Games 2008 in Beijing, especially in athletes with spinal cord injury.

METHODS

Forty-four athletes with a disability (27 with paraplegia (group 1), 3 with tetraplegia (group 2) and 14 with other disabilities such as blindness or single limb amputations (group 3) performed spirometry, skin prick testing, measurement of exhaled nitric oxide, eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation challenge test (EVH) and mannitol challenge test (MCT). A fall in FEV1 of ≥10% in either challenge test was deemed positive for exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

RESULTS

Fourteen (32%) athletes were atopic and 7 (16%) had a history of physician-diagnosed asthma. Absolute lung function values were significantly lower in patients of group 1 and 2 compared to group 3. Nine (20%) athletes were positive to EVH (8 paraplegics, 1 tetraplegic), and 8 (18%) athletes were positive to MCT (7 paraplegics, 1 tetraplegic). Fourteen (22.7%) subjects were positive to at least one challenge; only three athletes were positive to both tests. None of the athletes in group 3 had a positive test. Both challenge tests showed a significant association with physician-diagnosed asthma status (p = 0.0001). The positive and negative predictive value to diagnose physician-diagnosed asthma was 89% and 91% for EHV, and 75% and 86% for MCT, respectively.

CONCLUSION

EVH and MCT can be used to identify, but especially exclude asthma in Paralympic athletes.

Exhaled nitric oxide indicates poorly athlete's asthma

INTRODUCTION

In athletes, exercise-induced respiratory symptoms are common and their assessment is time and resource consuming.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to evaluate fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) as a predictor of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and of asthma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-seven elite athletes and a control group of 87 sedentary patients with symptoms suggesting asthma underwent measurements of FENO and of BHR by using methacholine provocation test (MCH) and eucapnic voluntary hyperpnoea (EVH) (athletes) or histamine provocation test (HIST) (controls).

RESULTS

In athletes, elevated FENO (>30 ppb) was not associated with lung function-confirmed asthma or with MCH positivity, but receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis showed some predictive value for EVH positivity [Area Under Curve (AUC) 0.652, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53 to 0.78, P = 0.020]. However, the sensitivity (55%) and the specificity (71%) were poor. In sedentary patients, FENO was significantly associated with both confirmed asthma and HIST positivity, ROC analysis showing FENO to be significantly predictive for HIST positivity (AUC 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70 to 0.96, P = 0.001) and for asthma (AUC 0.74, 95% CI: 0.63 to 0.85, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that in contrast to sedentary patients, FENO seems to be a poor predictor of BHR and of clinical asthma in elite athletes. We find it unlikely that FENO could be a useful screening tool in athletes with exercise-induced respiratory symptoms.

Assessment of EIB: What you need to know to optimize test results

Respiratory symptoms and asthma control questionnaires are poor predictors of the presence or severity of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB), and objective measurement is recommended. To optimize the chance of a positive test result, there are several factors to consider when exercising patients for EIB, including the ventilation achieved and sustained during exercise, water content of the inspired air, and the natural variability of the response. The high rate of negative exercise test results has led to the development of surrogates to identify EIB in laboratory or office settings, including eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea of dry air and inhalation of hyperosmolar aerosols.

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in elite long-distance runners in Brazil

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction among elite long-distance runners in Brazil and whether there is a difference in the training loads among athletes with and without exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study involving elite long-distance runners with neither current asthma symptoms nor a diagnosis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. All of the participants underwent eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea challenge and maximal cardiopulmonary exercise tests, as well as completing questionnaires regarding asthma symptoms and physical activity, in order to monitor their weekly training load.

RESULTS

Among the 86 male athletes recruited, participation in the study was agreed to by 20, of whom 5 (25%) were subsequently diagnosed with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. There were no differences between the athletes with and without exercise-induced bronchoconstriction regarding anthropometric characteristics, peak oxygen consumption, baseline pulmonary function values, or reported asthma symptoms. The weekly training load was significantly lower among those with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction than among those without.

CONCLUSIONS

In this sample of long-distance runners in Brazil, the prevalence of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction was high.

Exercise-induced bronchospasm

CONTEXT

Exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB) is a phenomenon of airway narrowing that occurs during or after exercise or physical exertion. This condition has been reported in a range of sporting activities but is most common in participants of cold-weather sports (eg, Nordic skiing) and indoor sports (eg, ice-skating and swimming). Traditionally, the terms exercise induced-asthma (EIA) and EIB have been used interchangeably; however, more recent evidence suggests that these entities are separate and should be described as such, given that their treatments differ.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Literature from 2000 to 2010 was obtained through searches of PubMed, Medline, and Google, with the keywords exercise-induced asthma, exercise-induced bronchospasm, asthma and athlete, and asthma and sport and with an emphasis on the current literature (last 3 to 4 years).

RESULTS

Although the current literature suggests a differentiation between EIA and EIB, this differentiation is not always clear, and the terms are still often used interchangeably. This lack of distinction makes it difficult to draw conclusions on optimal diagnosis and treatment of EIB.

CONCLUSION

EIB is prevalent in elite-level athletes, with certain groups being at increased risk. Diagnostic testing should be used when possible, given that recent studies suggest poor correlation between symptoms and testing. The mainstay of treatment remains the use of short-acting β-adrenergic agonists.

Eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation is superior to methacholine challenge testing for detecting airway hyperreactivity in nonathletes

INTRODUCTION

Response to eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation (EVH) has not been compared with methacholine challenge testing (MCCT) in nonathletes being evaluated for dyspnea on exertion.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the airway response to EVH and MCCT in a population of nonathletes who exercise regularly but have symptoms with exertion.

METHODS

We reviewed records for all patients with exercise symptoms who underwent both EVH and MCCT. Presenting symptoms, comorbid diseases, and results of bronchoprovocation (BP) testing were recorded. This study was approved by the institutional review board at our hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 131 patients (mean age 32.3 ± 11.6, body mass index (BMI) 27.1 ± 4.7 kg/m(2), 59.5% male) had an EVH, MCCT, and clinical evaluation performed. Overall, 37 (28.2%) patients had positive BP testing and met criteria for exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). There were 32 (24.4%) patients with a positive EVH, compared with only 11 patients with a positive MCCT (8.4%). There were 26 patients (19.8%) who had a positive EVH but a negative MCCT, and correlation between the two tests was poor to moderate (r = 0.11-0.57). A complaint of chest pain and younger age were independent predictors for a positive EVH, whereas a history of tobacco use and a decreased FEV(1)/FVC (forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity) predicted a positive MCCT. A previous diagnosis of asthma was an independent predictor for a response to either test. Discussion. In a population of nonathletes who exercise regularly and have symptoms with exertion, EIB is common. Correlation between EVH and MCCT in this population is poor, and although the tests are somewhat complementary, a large percentage of patients had a negative MCCT but a positive EVH.

CONCLUSIONS

EIB is common in nonathletes with exercise-induced symptoms, and EVH is the preferred test for this population.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

EIB is common in nonathletes who exercise regularly. In this population, MCCT will miss most patients with EIB, and MCCT and EVH show only poor-to-moderate correlation.

CAPSULE SUMMARY

EVH has not been compared with MCCT in nonathletes without a diagnosis of asthma. Our study shows that the two tests are complementary in this population, but EVH is positive more often.

Distinctive bronchial inflammation status in athletes: basophils, a new player

The aim of the study was to establish bronchial inflammation status and to measure eicosanoids in sputum obtained from active elite athletes. A total of 68 subjects were enrolled. Twelve were non-athletes and non-asthmatic (NAtNAs), 21 non-athlete asthmatics (NAtAs), 11 athlete non-asthmatics (AtNAs), and 24 athletes with asthma (AtAs) with positive indirect or direct bronchial challenges. Induced sputum was used to measure cells and eicosanoids. Sputum differential cell counts in all the subject groups revealed eosinophilia with the exception of NAtNAs control subjects. Athletes with and without diagnosed asthma showed a significant increase in bronchial epithelial cells and lymphocytes present in their sputum. Also, flow cytometry revealed that a significantly higher number of basophils were present in sputum from athletes (without and with asthma) when compared with non-athletes (without and with asthma). Asthmatic athletes and non-athletes showed a higher increase in LTC(4) levels and PGE(2) metabolites in sputum when compared with healthy controls. The present study identifies basophils as a new player present in athletes bronchial inflammation defining athlete status and not necessarily associated with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

Determinants of asthma control and quality of life in stable asthma: evaluation of two new cough provocation tests

INTRODUCTION

Asthma control and quality of life are poorly associated with traditional asthma biomarkers.

OBJECTIVES

In the present study, we evaluated two new cough provocation tests in this respect.

METHODS

Asthma Control Questionnaire and Leicester Cough Questionnaire were completed by 36 stable asthmatics. Cough provocation tests with hypertonic saline and isocapnic hyperpnoea of dry air were performed, as well as spirometry, ambulatory peak expiratory flow (PEF) monitoring and exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) measurement.

RESULTS

Leicester Cough Questionnaire score correlated closely with cough responsiveness to hypertonic saline and isocapnic hyperpnoea (R = -0.66, P < 0.001 and R = -0.49, P = 0.002, respectively). Asthma Control Questionnaire score also correlated with the cough responsiveness to these tests (R = 0.52, P = 0.001 and R = 0.43, P = 0.008, respectively). Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (%predicted), diurnal PEF variation and eNO did not correlate with cough-related quality of life but showed some association with asthma control. There was a significant correlation between Leicester Cough Questionnaire and Asthma Control Questionnaire (R = -0.54, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Asthma control and cough-related quality of life are more closely associated with cough responsiveness to the investigated cough provocation tests than to eNO and traditional indices of bronchial obstruction. Cough is a major contributor to poor asthma control.

Etiology of dyspnea in elite and recreational athletes

BACKGROUND

Breathing complaints are common in athletes. Studies have suggested that the prevalence of asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is higher in elite athletes than the general population. Vocal cord dysfunction (VCD) may mimic asthma and EIB as a cause of dyspnea in athletes. However, the majority of studies to date have primarily relied on symptoms to diagnose VCD, and there are limited data on coexistence of asthma, EIB, and/or VCD. It is well established that symptoms alone are inadequate to accurately diagnose EIB and VCD. Our goal was to define via objective testing the prevalence of asthma, EIB, VCD alone, or in combination in a cohort of athletes with respiratory complaints.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was done of 148 consecutive athletes (collegiate, middle school, high school, and recreational) referred to a tertiary care center's asthma center for evaluation of respiratory complaints with exercise. An evaluation including medical history, physical examination, and objective testing including pulmonary function testing (PFT), eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation, and video laryngostroboscopy, were performed.

RESULTS

The most common symptom was dyspnea on exertion (96%), with < 1% complaining of either hoarseness or stridor. The most common diagnosis prior to referral was asthma (40%). Only 16% had PFTs prior to referral. Following evaluation by a pulmonologist, 52% were diagnosed with EIB, 17% with asthma, and 70% with VCD. Of those diagnosed with asthma before our evaluation, the diagnosis of asthma was confirmed, with PFTs in only 19 of 59 (32%) athletes based on our testing. Vocal cord dysfunction was more common in females and in adolescent athletes. Coexistence of multiple disorders was common, such as EIB and asthma (8%), EIB and VCD (31%), and VCD and asthma (6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Asthma and EIB are common etiologies of dyspnea in athletes, both competitive and recreational. However, VCD is also common and can coexist with either asthma or EIB. Vocal cord dysfunction may contribute to exercise-related respiratory symptoms more frequently in middle school- and high school-aged athletes than in college athletes. Effective treatment of dyspnea requires appropriate identification and treatment of all disorders. Classic symptoms of stridor and/or hoarseness are often not present in athletes with VCD. Accurate diagnosis of asthma, EIB, and VCD requires objective testing and can prevent exposure of patients to medications that are ineffective and have potential adverse side effects. Furthermore, there is need for increased awareness of VCD as a common cause of respiratory complaints in athletes, either as a single diagnosis or in combination with EIB, especially in females, as well as middle school and high school athletes.

Misdiagnosis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in professional soccer players

BACKGROUND

Physicians typically rely heavily on self-reported symptoms to make a diagnosis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). However, in elite sport, respiratory symptoms have poor diagnostic value. In 2009, following a change in international sports regulations, all elite athletes suspected of asthma and/or EIB were required to undergo pulmonary function testing (PFT) to permit the use of inhaled β(2)-agonists. The aim of this study was to examine the diagnostic accuracy of physician diagnosis of asthma/EIB in English professional soccer players.

METHODS

Sixty-five players with a physician diagnosis of asthma/EIB were referred for pulmonary function assessment. Medication usage and respiratory symptoms were recorded by questionnaire. A bronchial provocation test with dry air was conducted in 42 players and a mannitol challenge in 18 players. Five players with abnormal resting spirometry performed a bronchodilator test.

RESULTS

Of the 65 players assessed, 57 (88%) indicated regular use of asthma medication. Respiratory symptoms during exercise were reported by 57 (88%) players. Only 33 (51%) of the players tested had a positive bronchodilator or bronchial provocation test. Neither symptoms nor the use of inhaled corticosteroids were predictive of pulmonary function tests' outcome.

CONCLUSION

A high proportion of English professional soccer players medicated for asthma/EIB (a third with reliever therapy only) do not present reversible airway obstruction or airway hyperresponsiveness to indirect stimuli. This underlines the importance of objective PFT to support a symptoms-based diagnosis of asthma/EIB in athletes.

Diagnostic exercise challenge testing

This article reviews the diagnostic challenge methods-both exercise and surrogate-for diagnosis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) and EIB with known asthma. Indirect challenges that release the entire repertoire of mediators representative of EIB and asthma are more specific for diagnosis and are recommended over direct challenges such as methacholine challenge, which are sensitive but nonspecific. Self-reported history and empiric therapeutic trials are not adequate for diagnosis of EIB with or without known asthma. Objective pulmonary function documentation with bronchodilator reversibility or exercise or surrogate challenge are optimal for diagnosis of EIB or EIB with known asthma. Such objective pulmonary function documentation is optimal for the proper management and healthy lifestyle of the exercising athlete or individual.

Screening for exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in college athletes

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have reported that the prevalence of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in athletes is higher than that of the general population. There is increasing evidence that athletes fail to recognize and report symptoms of EIB. As a result, there has been debate whether athletes should be screened for EIB, particularly in high-risk sports.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 144 athletes from six different varsity sports at a large National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I collegiate athletic program. Baseline demographics and medical history were obtained and the presence of asthma symptoms during exercise was documented. Each athlete subsequently underwent a eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation (EVH) test to document the presence of EIB. Exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) quantification was performed immediately before EVH testing. EIB was defined as a ≥10% decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second compared with baseline.

RESULTS

Only 4 of 144 (2.7%) athletes were EIB-positive after EVH testing. The presence of symptoms was not predictive of EIB as only 2 of the 64 symptomatic athletes (3%) were EIB-positive based on EVH testing. Two of the four athletes who were found to be EIB-positive denied such symptoms. The mean baseline eNO in the four EIB-positive athletes was 13.25 parts per billion (ppb) and 24.5 ppb in the EIB-negative athletes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data argue that screening for EIB is not recommended given the surprisingly low prevalence of EIB in the population we studied. In addition, the presence or absence of symptoms was not predictive of EIB and eNO testing was not effective in predicting EIB.

Cough response to isocapnic hyperpnoea of dry air and hypertonic saline are interrelated

Background

Mechanisms behind asthmatic cough are largely unknown. It is known that hyperosmolar challenges provoke cough in asthmatic but not in the healthy subjects. It has been postulated that isocapnic hyperpnea of dry air (IHDA) and hypertonic aerosols act via similar mechanisms in asthma to cause bronchoconstriction. We investigated whether there is an association between cough response induced by IHDA and hypertonic saline (HS) challenges.

Methods

Thirty-six asthmatic and 14 healthy subjects inhaled HS solutions with increasing osmolalities administered via ultrasonic nebuliser until 15 cumulative coughs were recorded. The IHDA consisted of three three-minute ventilation steps: 30%, 60% and 100% of maximal voluntary ventilation with an end-point of 30 cumulative coughs. The challenges were performed on separate days at least 48 hours between them and within one week. Inhaled salbutamol (400 mcg) was administered before the challenges to prevent bronchoconstriction. The cough response was expressed as the cough-to-dose ratio (CDR) which is the total number of coughs divided by the maximal osmolality inhaled or the maximal ventilation achieved.

Results

Cough response to IHDA correlated with the HS challenge (Rs = 0.59, p < 0.001). Cough response to IHDA was at its strongest during the first minute after the challenge. IHDA induced more cough among asthmatic than healthy subjects CDR being (mean ± SD) 0.464 ± 0.514 and 0.011 ± 0.024 coughs/MVV%, p < 0.001, respectively. Salbutamol effectively prevented bronchoconstriction to both challenges.

Conclusions

Asthmatic patients are hypersensitive to the cough-provoking effect of hyperpnoea, as they are to hypertonicity. Cough response induced by IHDA and HS correlated well suggesting similar mechanisms behind the responses.

Accuracy of eucapnic hyperpnea or mannitol to diagnose exercise-induced bronchoconstriction: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Exercise challenge testing is the typical method for diagnosing exercise induced bronchoconstriction; however, alternate tests have been developed.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this paper was to summarize the current literature comparing eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea and mannitol with standard exercise challenge testing to determine whether either test is a suitable alternative to standard exercise testing for the diagnosis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

METHODS

Using valid systematic review methods, a comprehensive search strategy to avoid publication bias, we identified 10 studies that compared exercise challenge testing with either eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea or mannitol.

RESULTS

For the 7 diagnostic cross-sectional studies that examined eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea, the sensitivity and specificity values were heterogeneous, ranging from 25 to 90% for sensitivity and 0 to 71% for specificity. In the 3 diagnostic cross-sectional studies that evaluated mannitol, the sensitivity and specificity ranged from 58 to 96% and 65 to 78%, respectively. For most studies, a representative spectrum of participants being tested was not used.

CONCLUSION

Given the heterogeneity in sensitivity and specificity of eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea studies and the relatively small number of studies that have examined mannitol, insufficient evidence is available to conclude that either of these tests are suitable alternatives to exercise challenge testing to detect exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Additional research is required.

Exercise-Induced Lung Disease: Too Much of a Good Thing?

Exercise in children has important health benefits. However, in elite endurance athletes, there is an increased prevalence of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and airway inflammation. Particularly at risk are those who practice in cold weather, ice rinks, swimming pools, and air pollution. The inflammation is caused by repetitive episodes of hyperventilation of cold, dry air, allergens, or toxins such as chlorine or air pollution. Children may be particularly at risk for lung injury under these conditions because of the immaturity and ongoing development of their lung. However, studies in pediatric athletes and exercising young children are sparse. Epithelial injury associated with hyperventilation of cold, dry air has not been described in children. However, exercise in the presence of air pollution and chlorine is associated with airway injury and the development of asthma in children; the effect appears to be modulated by both atopy and genetic polymorphisms. While management of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and asthma is well established, there is little data to guide treatment or prevention of remodeling in athletes or inhalational lung injury in children. Studies underscore the need to maintain high levels of air quality. More investigations should be undertaken to better define the natural history, pathophysiology, and treatment of exercise-induced pulmonary inflammation in both elite athletes and exercising children.

Effect of sodium cromoglycate on mast cell mediators during hyperpnea in athletes

INTRODUCTION

The role of mast cells in the airway response to exercise and the benefit of sodium cromoglycate (SCG) in athletes are unclear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to clarify the role of mast cell mediators in the airway response to exercise in athletes and to investigate the effect of SCG.

METHODS

Eleven athletes with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB+) and 11 without (EIB-) performed a eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea (EVH) test (a surrogate for exercise) 10 min after inhalation of a placebo or 40 mg of the mast cell stabilizing agent sodium cromoglycate. The urinary concentrations of 9a,11β-PGF2 (a metabolite of PGD2 and a marker of mast cell activation) and leukotriene E4 (LTE4) were measured by enzyme immunoassay 60 min before and for 90 min after the challenge.

RESULTS

In the EIB+ group, the maximum fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of 20.3% ± 3% on placebo was reduced to 11.5% ± 1.9% after SCG (P = 0.003). There was an increase in the urinary excretion of 9α,11β-PGF2 on the placebo day after EVH in both groups (P < 0.05) that was abolished by SCG. In the EIB+ group, there was also an increase of urinary LTE4 on the placebo day that was abolished by SCG, whereas the urinary excretion of LTE4 was inconsistent in the EIB- group.

CONCLUSIONS

The results support mast cell activation with release of bronchoconstrictive mediators after hyperpnea in athletes with and without EIB and inhibition by SCG. The degree of airway responsiveness to the specific mediator released is likely to determine whether or not bronchoconstriction will occur after EVH.

Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of exercise-induced bronchospasm

Exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB) is a common occurrence in individuals with asthma, though it can also affect individuals without asthma. It occurs frequently in athletes. Common symptoms include coughing, dyspnea, chest tightness, and wheezing; however, there can be a variety of more subtle symptoms. The differential diagnosis of EIB is broad and includes several pulmonary and cardiac disorders. During the initial evaluation, a complete history, physical examination, and spirometry should be performed. In most patients with EIB, the baseline spirometry is normal; therefore, bronchoprovocation testing is strongly recommended. Both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic approaches are important in the treatment of EIB. Management of EIB on the sideline of athletic events requires preparation and immediate access to rescue inhalers.

Randomized controlled trial of fish oil and montelukast and their combination on airway inflammation and hyperpnea-induced bronchoconstriction

Background

Both fish oil and montelukast have been shown to reduce the severity of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of fish oil and montelukast, alone and in combination, on airway inflammation and bronchoconstriction induced by eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea (EVH) in asthmatics.

Methods

In this model of EIB, twenty asthmatic subjects with documented hyperpnea-induced bronchoconstriction (HIB) entered a randomized double-blind trial. All subjects entered on their usual diet (pre-treatment, n = 20) and then were randomly assigned to receive either one active 10 mg montelukast tablet and 10 placebo fish oil capsules (n = 10) or one placebo montelukast tablet and 10 active fish oil capsules totaling 3.2 g EPA and 2.0 g DHA (n = 10) taken daily for 3-wk. Thereafter, all subjects (combination treatment; n = 20) underwent another 3-wk treatment period consisting of a 10 mg active montelukast tablet or 10 active fish oil capsules taken daily.

Results

While HIB was significantly inhibited (p<0.05) by montelukast, fish oil and combination treatment compared to pre-treatment, there was no significant difference (p>0.017) between treatment groups; percent fall in forced expiratory volume in 1-sec was −18.4±2.1%, −9.3±2.8%, −11.6±2.8% and −10.8±1.7% on usual diet (pre-treatment), fish oil, montelukast and combination treatment respectively. All three treatments were associated with a significant reduction (p<0.05) in F_ENO, exhaled breathe condensate pH and cysteinyl-leukotrienes, while the fish oil and combination treatment significantly reduced (p<0.05) urinary 9α, 11β-prostaglandin F₂ after EVH compared to the usual diet; however, there was no significant difference (p>0.017) in these biomarkers between treatments.

Conclusion

While fish oil and montelukast are both effective in attenuating airway inflammation and HIB, combining fish oil with montelukast did not confer a greater protective effect than either intervention alone. Fish oil supplementation should be considered as an alternative treatment for EIB.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00676468

Desempenho de uma escala analógica visual legendada na determinação do grau de dispneia durante teste de broncoespasmo induzido por exercício em crianças e adolescentes asmáticos

OBJETIVO: Existe uma relação indireta entre a obstrução das vias aéreas em asma e a intensidade de falta de ar (dispneia). Uma escala visual analógica legendada de dispneia com escore de 0-3 pontos tem sido amplamente utilizada na avaliação da broncoconstrição, embora a percepção de tal obstrução seja muito variável. O objetivo deste estudo foi determinar se crianças e adolescentes são capazes de perceber a broncoconstrição aguda induzida por exercício (BAIE), bem como medir o poder discriminatório de uma escala visual analógica legendada de dispneia em relação à intensidade de BAIE. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal com 134 crianças e adolescentes asmáticos que foram submetidos a um teste de broncoespasmo induzido por seis minutos de exercício em um cicloergômetro. A intensidade da dispneia foi determinada utilizando-se uma escala visual analógica legendada de dispneia antes de cada determinação de VEF1. A escala tem um escore de 0-3 pontos, com desenhos em uma sequência lógica variando entre "sem sintomas" e "dispneia grave". As variáveis foram determinadas no momento basal, assim como em 5, 10 e 20 minutos após o término do teste de exercício. A acurácia da escala de dispneia em detectar o grau de BAIE foi determinada através de curvas ROC para a queda de VEF1 após o exercício, usando pontos de corte de 10%, 20%, 30% e 40%. RESULTADOS: Dos pacientes selecionados, 111 completaram o estudo, e 52 (46,8%) apresentaram BAIE. A área sob a curva ROC progressivamente aumentou com o aumento do grau de broncoconstrição. CONCLUSÕES: Em crianças e adolescentes asmáticos, a acurácia desta escala de dispneia melhora com o aumento do percentual de queda em VEF1 após o exercício. Entretanto, o valor preditivo da escala é subótimo quando a porcentagem de queda em VEF1é menor.

Indirect challenge tests: Airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma: its measurement and clinical significance

Indirect challenges cause the release of endogenous mediators that cause the airway smooth muscle to contract and the airways to narrow. Airway sensitivity to indirect challenges is reduced or even totally inhibited by treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), so a positive response to an indirect stimulus is believed to reflect active airway inflammation. The indirect challenges commonly used in pulmonary function laboratories include exercise, eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea, hypertonic (4.5%) saline, and mannitol. Exercise was the first test to be standardized and was used to identify exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). The inhibition of EIB in young children by sodium cromoglycate led to the concept that mast cells were important very early in the onset of asthma. All of these indirect challenges are associated with the release of mast cell mediators (eg, prostaglandins, leukotrienes, and histamine). The hypertonic saline and mannitol challenges arose from the concept that EIB was caused by an increased osmolarity of the airway surface with release of mediators. These osmotic aerosols simplified testing with indirect challenges in the laboratory, improving the potential to identify currently active asthma. Although hyperresponsiveness to indirect challenges is frequently associated with a sputum eosinophilia, it is not a prerequisite because the mast cell is the most important source of mediators. The mechanism for ICS reducing hyperresponsiveness to indirect challenges likely involves both mast cells and eosinophils. Indirect challenges are appropriate to inform further on both the pathogenesis of asthma and the role of antiinflammatory agents in its treatment.

[Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in non-asthmatic athletes]

INTRODUCTION

A new clinical entity, exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB), has been recently defined which describes bronchoconstriction occurring in association with exercise in susceptible non-asthmatic persons.

STATE OF ART

There is considerable evidence that the pathogenesis of this condition is related to airway injury, due to prolonged hyperventilation and aggressive environmental factors. If the objective diagnostic tests are identical for the diagnosis of exercise induced asthma and EIB, the diagnoses are established differently, according to the high sensitivity of provocation by exercise "in the field" or the eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation provocation test.

PERSPECTIVES

Current pharmacological treatment is based upon the inhalation of ß2-agonists prior to exercise, but to be granted permission to use them, athletes are required to provide documentation of objective evidence of EIB. Therefore, the diagnostic pathway in athletes is essential and respiratory physicians need to know the specific features of this new clinical entity.

CONCLUSIONS

EIB distinct from the presence of asthma is prevalent in elite athletes and its determinants should be well known by their health care providers to assure an optimal management of this peculiar disease, in respect to drug doping regulations.

Airway responsiveness to indirect challenges in COPD

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) demonstrate airway hyperresponsiveness to a number of indirect stimuli. Hyperresponsiveness to cold air hyperventilation, exercise, and drugs like propranalol and methoxamine seem to be able to distinguish patients with COPD from those with asthma, whereas hyperresponsiveness to stimuli like adenosine 5-monophosphate (AMP) and hypertonic saline seem unable to do so. The relationship of airway responsiveness to indirect stimuli and airway inflammation has received little study. The clinical relevance of hyperresponsiveness to an indirect challenge, including the impact on the natural history, relation to types of bronchitis, baseline airway calibre, and response to treatment need to be studied.

Effect of fluticasone on markers of inflammation and quality of life in steroid-naive patients with mild asthma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Patients with mild asthma may adapt to symptoms that may be neglected at a medical consultation. Despite active airway inflammation, indicating need for treatment symptoms may be poorly perceived and influence on quality of life. The aim was to find out if markers of asthma activity and quality of life are influenced by inhaled steroids in patients who regard themselves as free of symptoms.

METHODS

Seventy steroid-free patients with mild asthma were treated with inhaled fluticasone (250 microg twice daily) or placebo for 3 months in a randomised, double-blind, study. Spirometry with reversibility test, exhaled nitric oxide (NO), bronchial responsiveness to methacholine and eucapnic dry air hyperventilation and quality of life [(Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)] were assessed before and after treatment.

RESULTS

Fluticasone, but not placebo, decreased methacholine responsiveness. Bronchial responsiveness to dry air and exhaled NO levels was significantly lowered by fluticasone compared with placebo. Quality-of-life scores were high already before treatment and were not significantly altered by treatment.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with an inhaled steroid in mild asthmatics altered bronchial responsiveness and exhaled NO levels but did not improve quality of life. In mild asthma, there is thus a space for improvement with regard to inflammatory parameters in patients who have only minor symptoms that are not influenced by treatment. In a long-term perspective, the indication for treatment of surrogate markers remains, however, unclear.

Exercise-induced asthma in children

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction affects 40-90% of people with asthma, compared with 3-15% of the general population. Exercise-induced asthma (EIA) is diagnosed on the basis of subjective symptoms of airflow obstruction during and after exercise, objective measures of airflow obstruction and the exclusion of alternative diagnoses. Although the pathogenesis of EIA has not been fully elucidated, two major theories have been proposed: the airway rewarming theory and the hyperosmolarity theory. Increasing evidence suggests that airway inflammation plays a major role in the pathogenesis of EIA. In this article, we review the prevalence, pathogenesis, methods for diagnosis and treatment of EIA, as well as the responsiveness of children and adolescents to EIA therapies.

Exercise-induced wheeze: Fraction of exhaled nitric oxide-directed management

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Exercise-induced wheeze (EIW) is common. Several treatment options exist. Patients with low fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (F(E)NO) are unlikely to be steroid-responsive and might benefit from non-steroidal therapies. We assessed: the efficacy of cromoglycate, formoterol and montelukast in patients with EIW and low F(E)NO (<35 ppb) in a randomized cross-over trial, and the efficacy of inhaled corticosteroid in a high F(E)NO (>35 ppb) group.

METHODS

Patients had EIW and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) to mannitol and/or exercise. Those with low F(E)NO (n = 19) received cromoglycate (20 mg inh. bd + before challenge tests), formoterol (12 microg inh. bd + before challenge tests) and montelukast (10 mg p.o. od), each for 2 weeks. Those with high F(E)NO (n = 20) took inhaled fluticasone (500 microg) daily for 4 weeks. Primary end-points were: 50% reduction in maximum FEV(1) %fall (clinical protection) and decrease in AHR to mannitol.

RESULTS

In patients with low F(E)NO, cromoglycate, formoterol and montelukast significantly decreased AHR to mannitol in 63%, 61% and 47% of patients, respectively. In this group, the magnitude of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) was significantly reduced with montelukast and formoterol; between-treatment differences were not significant. Of 6/19 with low F(E)NO and EIB, protection occurred in 67% (cromoglycate), 83% (formoterol) and 50% (montelukast), respectively. In the high F(E)NO group, AHR to mannitol and EIB decreased significantly with fluticasone (P < 0.001, P = 0.005, respectively), and protection occurred in 7/8 (88%) with EIB.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with EIW and low F(E)NO, the number of 'responders' to cromoglycate, formoterol and montelukast was similar. In a high F(E)NO population the response to inhaled corticosteroid was highly significant and comparable to previous studies.

Direct and indirect challenges in the clinical assessment of asthma

OBJECTIVE

To compare direct and indirect bronchoprovocation challenges in the clinical assessment of asthma.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed search using the keywords adenosine monophosphate, eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea, exercise, hypertonic saline, mannitol, and methacholine challenges and asthma.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles were selected based on their relevance to the topic of this review.

RESULTS

Methacholine is the most widely used direct challenge. Methacholine is highly sensitive, provided symptoms are clinically current and deep inhalations are avoided during inhalation. There are many causes of a false-positive test result. Specificity is increased if the pretest probability of asthma is greater, if the methacholine responsiveness is moderate or greater, and if the methacholine-induced symptoms mimic the natural symptoms. Indirect challenges are more specific for asthma but are insensitive, particularly for mild and/or well-controlled asthma. The lower sensitivity may relate to the fact that many indirect challenges (eg, exercise, eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea, adenosine monophosphate) are dose limited (ie, the dose of stimulus cannot be increased above a level based on physiology or solubility). Indirect challenges also correlate better with airway inflammation and are more responsive to anti-inflammatory treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct challenges (ie, methacholine), because of the high sensitivity, function best to exclude clinically current asthma; a positive test result is consistent with but not diagnostic of asthma. By contrast, indirect challenges are superior for confirming asthma and are the challenges of choice when exercise bronchospasm is the question (eg, certification for international athletic competition, armed forces, scuba diving). Indirect challenges would be preferred for monitoring of asthma control and used serially to help diagnose occupational asthma.

Airway responses to eucapnic hyperpnea, exercise, and methacholine in elite swimmers

PURPOSE

The International Olympic Committee Medical Commission (IOC-MC) requires athletes to provide the result of an objective test to support a diagnosis of asthma or exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) if they want to inhale a beta-2-agonist. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the airway response to a methacholine challenge and to hyperpnea induced by exercise in the field and in the laboratory or that induced voluntarily by eucapnic hyperpnea in a group of female elite swimmers.

METHODS

Sixteen female nonasthmatic elite swimmers performed a eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea (EVH) test, a field-based exercise test (FBT), a laboratory-based exercise test (LBT), and a methacholine challenge. The criteria suggested by the IOC-MC were used to define a positive response to the challenges (EVH, field test, and laboratory test: minimum 10% decrease in FEV1; methacholine: PD20 < or = 2 micromol).

RESULTS

Eight swimmers (50%) had at least one positive test to hyperpnea. Five were identified with the EVH test, four with FBT, and four with LBT. None were identified using methacholine. Three swimmers with airway hyperresponsiveness to exercise would have been identified using a higher cutoff for methacholine (PD20 < or = 8 micromol).

CONCLUSIONS

The EVH test is the test that diagnoses most swimmers with an abnormal response to hyperpnea, but not all cases of EIB are identified with the EVH test. Performing a methacholine test using IOC-MC's cutoff value does not improve the chances of diagnosing EIB. We recommend performing the EVH test when diagnosing and evaluating EIB in elite swimmers and if EVH test negative then proceeding to a strenuous LBT.

Diagnostic and therapeutic value of airway challenges in asthma

Airway challenges are of value in the assessment of asthma. Direct challenges (histamine and methacholine) are highly sensitive for clinically current symptomatic asthma and particularly useful to exclude current asthma when they are negative. Indirect challenges (exercise, eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation, adenosine monophosphate, hypertonic saline, mannitol) are more specific but very insensitive for clinical asthma. They are of particular value to confirm asthma and to differentiate asthma from other airway diseases, such as chronic airflow limitation. The indirect stimuli are the challenges of choice for evaluating exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

Efeito do tratamento clínico de um corredor de longa distância com broncoespasmo induzido pelo exercício: relato de caso

O broncoespasmo induzido pelo exercício (BIE) é uma condição que se caracteriza pelo estreitamento transitório das vias aéreas durante ou após o esforço físico e afeta principalmente portadores de asma. Em atletas profissionais que praticam esportes de alta intensidade, a prevalência também é alta; no entanto, seu diagnóstico permanece subestimado. O presente estudo descreve o caso de um atleta do sexo masculino, 23 anos, corredor de longa distância sem histórico de asma, que após um teste gradual de exercício apresentou chiado no peito e queda da função pulmonar. Após um teste específico, o atleta foi diagnosticado como BIE positivo. Iniciou-se, então, um tratamento clínico com broncodilatador e após 30 dias verificou-se melhora importante em seu consumo máximo de oxigênio, obtido no pico do esforço (VO2 pico).

Bronchoprovocation testing

Airway smooth muscles of asthmatics tend to be hyperresponsive when provoked. The exaggerated bronchial constriction can be measured by the airflow limitation seen following bronchial provocation. Measuring bronchial hyperresponsiveness by broncho provocation testing is helpful in diagnosing and optimizing therapy. While numerous agents have been used to provoke a measurable airflow limitation, standardized protocols are available for only a few. This article aims to discuss the various methods that have been reported for bronchoprovocation testing.

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction: The effects of montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is very common in both patients with asthma and those who are otherwise thought to be normal. The intensity of exercise as well as the type of exercise is important in producing symptoms. This may make some types of exercise such as swimming more suitable and extended running more difficult for patients with this condition. A better understanding of EIB will allow the physician to direct the patient towards a type of exercise and medications that can result in a more active lifestyle without the same concern for resulting symptoms. This is especially important for schoolchildren who are usually enrolled in physical education classes and elite athletes who may desire to participate in competitive sports. Fortunately several medications (short- and long-acting beta(2)-agonists, cromolyn, nedocromil, inhaled corticosteroids, and more recently leukotriene modifiers) have been shown to be effective in preventing or attenuating the effects of exercise in many patients. In addition, inhaled beta(2)-agonists have been shown to quickly reverse the airway obstruction that develops in patients and continue to be the reliever medications of choice. Inhaled corticosteroids are increasingly being recommended as regular therapy now that the role of inflammation and airway injury has been identified in EIB. With the discovery that there is a release of mediators such as histamine and leukotrienes from cells in the airway following exercise with resulting airway obstruction in susceptible individuals, interest has turned to attenuating their effects with mediator antagonists especially those that block the effects of leukotrienes. Studies with an oral leukotriene antagonist, montelukast, have shown beneficial effects in adults and children aged as young as 6 years with EIB. These effects can be demonstrated as soon as two hours and as long as 24 hours after administration without a demonstrated loss of a protective effect after months of treatment. The studies leading up to and resulting in an approval of montelukast for EIB for patients aged 15 years and older are reviewed in this paper.

Exercise and other indirect challenges to demonstrate asthma or exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in athletes

The prevalence of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction is reported to be high among recreational and elite athletes, yet diagnosis is often symptom-based. Indirect challenges such as the laboratory exercise challenge provide objective criteria for proper diagnosis and treatment. However, a standardized protocol using appropriate exercise intensity, duration, and dry air inhalation is often not implemented, and thus a false-negative test may result. This article reviews and describes the symptom-based diagnosis, the exercise challenge, and other indirect challenges such as eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea, hypertonic saline inhalation, and inhaled powdered mannitol as methods to diagnose and evaluate exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Advantages and disadvantages of each diagnostic procedure are presented.

Asthma and the elite athlete: summary of the International Olympic Committee's consensus conference, Lausanne, Switzerland, January 22-24, 2008

Respiratory symptoms cannot be relied on to make a diagnosis of asthma and/or airways hyperresponsiveness (AHR) in elite athletes. For this reason, the diagnosis should be confirmed with bronchial provocation tests. Asthma management in elite athletes should follow established treatment guidelines (eg, Global Initiative for Asthma) and should include education, an individually tailored treatment plan, minimization of aggravating environmental factors, and appropriate drug therapy that must meet the requirements of the World Anti-Doping Agency. Asthma control can usually be achieved with inhaled corticosteroids and inhaled beta(2)-agonists to minimize exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and to treat intermittent symptoms. The rapid development of tachyphylaxis to beta(2)-agonists after regular daily use poses a dilemma for athletes. Long-term intense endurance training, particularly in unfavorable environmental conditions, appears to be associated with an increased risk of developing asthma and AHR in elite athletes. Globally, the prevalence of asthma, exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, and AHR in Olympic athletes reflects the known prevalence of asthma symptoms in each country. The policy of requiring Olympic athletes to demonstrate the presence of asthma, exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, or AHR to be approved to inhale beta(2)-agonists will continue.

Airway responsiveness and inflammation in adolescent elite swimmers

BACKGROUND

Whereas increased airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and airway inflammation are well documented in adult elite athletes, it remains uncertain whether the same airway changes are present in adolescents involved in elite sport.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate airway responsiveness and airway inflammation in adolescent elite swimmers.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study on adolescent elite swimmers (n = 33) and 2 control groups: unselected adolescents (n = 35) and adolescents with asthma (n = 32). The following tests were performed: questionnaire, exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), spirometry, induced sputum, methacholine challenge, eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea (EVH) test, and exhaled breath condensate pH.

RESULTS

There were no differences in FeNO, exhaled breath condensate pH, cellular composition in sputum, or prevalence of AHR to either EVH or methacholine among the 3 groups. When looking at airway responsiveness as a continuous variable, the swimmers were more responsive to EVH than unselected subjects, but less responsive to methacholine compared with subjects with asthma. We found no differences in the prevalence of respiratory symptoms between the swimmers and the unselected adolescents. There was no difference in FeNO, cellular composition of sputum, airway reactivity, or prevalence of having AHR to methacholine and/or EVH between swimmers with and without respiratory symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Adolescent elite swimmers do not have significant signs of airway damage after only a few years of intense training and competition. This leads us to believe that elite swimmers do not have particularly susceptible airways when they take up competitive swimming when young, but that they develop respiratory symptoms, airway inflammation, and AHR during their swimming careers.

Mechanisms of asthma in Olympic athletes--practical implications

Athletes' symptoms may only occur in extreme conditions, which are far from normal. Exercise may increase ventilation up to 200 l/min for short periods in speed and power athletes, and for longer periods in endurance athletes such as swimmers and cross-country skiers. Increasing proportions of young athletes are atopic, i.e. they show signs of IgE-mediated allergy which is, along with the sport event (endurance sport), a major risk factor for asthma and respiratory symptoms. Mechanisms in the etiology and clinical phenotypes vary between disciplines and individuals, and it may be an oversimplification to discuss athlete's asthma as a distinct and unambiguous disease. Nevertheless, the experience on Finnish Olympic athletes suggests at least two different clinical phenotypes, which may reflect different underlying mechanisms. The pattern of 'classical asthma' is characterized by early onset childhood asthma, methacholine responsiveness, atopy and signs of eosinophilic airway inflammation, reflected by increased exhaled nitric oxide levels. Another distinct phenotype includes late onset symptoms (during sports career), bronchial responsiveness to eucapnic hyperventilation test, but not necessarily to inhaled methacholine, and a variable association with atopic markers and nitric oxide. A mixed type of eosinophilic and neutrophilic airway inflammation seems to affect especially swimmers, ice-hockey players, and cross-country skiers. The inflammation may represent a multifactorial trauma, in which both allergic and irritant mechanisms play a role. There is a significant problem of both under- and overdiagnosing asthma in athletes and the need for objective testing is emphasized. Follow-up studies are needed to assess the temporal relationship between asthma and competitive sporting, taking better into account individual disposition, environmental factors (exposure), intensity of training and potential confounders.

Exercise-induced asthma, respiratory and allergic disorders in elite athletes: epidemiology, mechanisms and diagnosis: part I of the report from the Joint Task Force of the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) in cooperation with GA2LEN

AIMS

To analyze the changes in the prevalence of asthma, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and allergies in elite athletes over the past years, to review the specific pathogenetic features of these conditions and to make recommendations for their diagnosis.

METHODS

The Task Force reviewed present literature by searching Medline up to November 2006 for relevant papers by the search words: asthma, bronchial responsiveness, EIB, athletes and sports. Sign criteria were used to assess level of evidence and grades of recommendation.

RESULTS

The problems of sports-related asthma and allergy are outlined. Epidemiological evidence for an increased prevalence of asthma and BHR among competitive athletes, especially in endurance sports, is provided. The mechanisms for development of asthma and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in athletes are outlined. Criteria are given for the diagnosis of asthma and exercise induced asthma in the athlete.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of asthma and bronchial hyperresponsiveness is markedly increased in athletes, especially within endurance sports. Environmental factors often contribute. Recommendations for the diagnosis of asthma in athletes are outlined.

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in athletes-should we screen?

The fact that exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) may be both over- and underdiagnosed in athletes has led to calls for widespread screening for the condition. This article assesses such a strategy by employing the standard framework used when evaluating any screening policy. This approach highlights a number of concerns and allows recommendations to help optimize the success of such a strategy if it were to be implemented.

Prevalence of exercise-induced bronchospasm in a cohort of varsity college athletes

INTRODUCTION

Exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB) occurs more commonly in elite athletes than in the general population. There have been relatively few prevalence studies examining EIB in college athletes despite studies which have shown significant morbidity from asthma attacks related to exercise occurring in athletes in this age group. None of the previous studies utilized eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea (EVH) testing, which is the currently recommended test to document EIB in Olympians.

METHODS

Varsity athletes at The Ohio State University underwent EVH testing to assess for EIB.

RESULTS

One hundred seven athletes from 22 sports participated. Forty-two of 107 athletes (39%) were EIB positive according to EVH results. Thirty-six of 42 EIB-positive athletes (86%) had no prior history of EIB or asthma. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of EIB according to sex of the athlete (P=0.65) or ventilation demands of the sport (P=0.64). Symptoms were not predictive of EIB (P=0.44). The prevalence of EIB was 36% in athletes with negative symptoms and 35% for those with positive symptoms. Athletes in high-ventilation sports were significantly more symptomatic (48%) than athletes in low-ventilation sports (25%) (P=0.02); however, there was no difference in the prevalence of EIB between the two groups (P=0.64).

CONCLUSIONS

Varsity athletes show a high incidence of EIB when objectively diagnosed by a variety of pulmonary function criteria. Sex of the athlete or ventilation demands of the sport does not affect the prevalence of EIB. The use of symptoms to diagnose EIB is not predictive of whether athletes have objectively documented EIB. Empiric diagnosis and treatment of EIB on the basis of subjective symptoms alone may lead to an increased number of inaccurate diagnoses and increased morbidity.

Impulse oscillometry is sensitive to bronchoconstriction after eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation or exercise

Airway responses were compared following 6-minute eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation and 6-minute exercise challenges by examining resting and post-challenge impulse oscillometry and spirometry variables. Twenty-two physically active individuals with probable exercise-induced bronchoconstriction took part in this study. Impulse oscillometry and spirometry were performed at baseline and for 20 minutes post-challenge at 5-minute intervals. High correlation was found between the two measures of change in airway function for both methods of challenge. Impulse oscillometry detected a difference in degree of response to the challenges, whereas spirometry indicated no difference, suggesting that impulse oscillometry is a more sensitive measure of change in airway function.

Non-invasive measurement of airway inflammation in asthma

Assessing the severity and control of a patient's asthma is of great importance to ensure that pharmacotherapy is optimized. Measures such as lung function, symptoms, and reliever use have traditionally been used as objective means of undertaking this assessment, but until now the level of airway inflammation has not been quantified. As asthma is primarily an inflammatory disorder, it would be desirable to include a measure of this process when evaluating disease control. The following article outlines methods of non-invasively measuring asthmatic airway inflammation and highlights their potential role in clinical practice.

Quality of life and inflammatory markers in mild asthma

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between quality of life and measures of asthma, such as lung function, reversibility to bronchodilation, exhaled nitric oxide (NO), and bronchial responsiveness to direct and indirect stimulus in patients with mild asthma in a primary care setting.

PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS

Seventy-seven asthmatic patients not treated with glucocorticosteroids completed the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. Spirometry was performed before and after bronchodilation, and bronchial challenges with methacholine and eucapnic dry air hyperventilation were conducted on separate days. NO in exhaled air and serum IgE were also analyzed.

RESULTS

We found no correlation between quality of life and any of the other parameters. There was a significant covariation between exhaled NO and bronchial responsiveness to methacholine and dry air, and also between FEV(1) (percentage of predicted) and reversibility to a bronchodilator. The levels of exhaled NO were higher in the asthmatic subjects with atopy than in the nonatopic asthmatics.

CONCLUSIONS

The measures used in our study do not reflect health-related quality of life in subjects with mild asthma. We conclude that in the clinical situation, quality of life and other measures of asthma provide complementary information.

Screening elite winter athletes for exercise induced asthma: a comparison of three challenge methods

BACKGROUND

The reported prevalence of exercise induced asthma (EIA) in elite winter athletes ranges from 9% to 50%. Many elite winter athletes do not report symptoms of EIA. At present there is no gold standard test for EIA.

OBJECTIVE

To establish the efficacy of screening for EIA and examine the role of the eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation (EVH) challenge and laboratory based and sport specific exercise challenges in the evaluation of elite winter athletes.

METHODS

14 athletes (mean (SD) age 22.6 (5.7) years, height 177.2 (7.0) cm, body mass 68.9 (16.9) kg) from the Great Britain short-track speed skating (n = 10) and biathlon teams (n = 4) were studied. Each athlete completed a laboratory based and sport specific exercise challenge as well as an EVH challenge, in randomised order.

RESULTS

All 14 athletes completed each challenge. Two had a previous history of asthma. Ten (including the two with a previous history) had a positive test to at least one of the challenges. Ten athletes had a positive response to EVH; of these, only three also had a positive response to the sport specific challenge. No athletes had a positive response to the laboratory based challenge.

CONCLUSIONS

Elite athletes should be screened for EIA. EVH is a more sensitive challenge in asymptomatic athletes than sport specific and laboratory based challenges. If sporting governing bodies were to implement screening programmes to test athletes for EIA, EVH is the challenge of choice.