Effect of spinal osteophytosis on bone mineral density measurements in vertebral osteoporosis

Lumbar osteoarthritis, bone mineral density, and quantitative ultrasound

Low bone mass is a major risk factor for osteoporotic fractures. Thus, bone density evaluation, performed by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) is important for diagnosis and monitoring treatment of osteoporosis. The accuracy of DXA, particularly at the lumbar spine, can be affected by several factors such as degenerative diseases. To evaluate the effects of vertebral osteophytosis on densitometric measurements, we examined 198 women, aged 32-81 years, who had undergone lateral X-ray of the lumbar spine. We classified patients according to different grades of osteophytosis, and evaluated bone density at the lumbar spine and the proximal femur by DXA. We also performed quantitative ultrasound at the heel (QUS). Patients with severe osteophytosis were significantly older (p < 0.0005), and values were adjusted for this parameter. We observed a significant increase in lumbar bone density with worsening osteophytosis (p < 0.02). On the contrary, no significant differences were found at the femur and QUS. According to bone density at the femoral neck, we subdivided patients into two groups: osteoporotic (group A) and non-osteoporotic (group B). Both groups showed increasingly high bone density at the spine with worsening osteophytosis (A: p < 0.01; B: p < 0.02). No differences were found in all the other evaluations. In conclusion, lumbar spine measurement is dramatically influenced by osteophytosis, particularly in the elderly. Consequently, other strategies should be performed such as evaluation of the hip and also measurement of the heel by ultrasound, which could be an interesting approach in these cases.

Posterior-anterior and lateral dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of vertebral osteoporosis and bone loss among older men

Lateral spine dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) selectively measures the trabecular-rich vertebral bodies without the contributions of the cortical-rich posterior elements of the spine and is less affected by spinal degenerative disease than posterior-anterior DXA. We tested whether lateral DXA detects vertebral osteoporosis more often and is more sensitive to age-related bone loss than posterior-anterior DXA in 193 healthy, community-dwelling men aged 51-81 years (mean +/- SD; 67 +/- 8 years). All men had supine lateral, posterior-anterior, and proximal femur DXA scans on a Hologic QDR 2000 densitometer. A subset (n = 102) had repeat scans after 4 years to determine annualized rates of change in bone mineral density (BMD). Age was inversely and significantly associated with BMD in the midlateral (r = -0.27) and lateral (r = -0.24) but not posterior-anterior (r = 0.04) projections. Midlateral (-1.43 +/- 3.48% per year; p = 0.0001), lateral (-0.27 +/- 1.68% per year; p = 0.12), and hip (-0.19 +/- 1.02% per year; p = 0.06) BMD decreased, whereas posterior-anterior BMD increased (0.73 +/- 1.11% per year; p = 0.0001) during follow-up. When compared with normal values in 43 men aged 21-42 years, mean T scores were significantly lower with lateral (-1.47 +/- 1.32) and midlateral (-1.57 +/- 1.36) than posterior-anterior (-0.12 +/- 1.30; p < 0.0001) DXA. Only 2.6% of the older men were considered osteoporotic (T score < or = -2.5) at the posterior-anterior spine, whereas 11.0% were osteoporotic at the femoral neck, 22.5% at the lateral spine, and 24.6% were osteoporotic at the midlateral spine. We conclude that supine lateral DXA identifies considerably more men as osteoporotic and is more sensitive to age-related bone loss than posterior-anterior DXA. Spinal osteoporosis may represent a substantially greater health problem among older men than previously recognized.

Corticosteroids do not alter the threshold for vertebral fracture

Corticosteroid use is one of the most important secondary causes of osteoporosis. Generally, it has been believed that in addition to its effect on bone mineral density (BMD), it also causes an alteration in bone quality that means that fractures occur at a lower BMD than might be expected. To establish if this is the case, we have compared the relationship between BMD and vertebral fracture in patients receiving corticosteroids with that in patients who had never received such therapy. Information was gathered on those patients who had been referred to the participating centers and had both BMD measurements and lateral thoracolumbar radiographs. In all, 452 patients (391 female) were identified; of these 82 (63 female) were receiving corticosteroids. There was no significant difference in BMD between the patients on corticosteroids and those with other suspected causes of osteoporosis. Vertebral fractures were present in 53% of patients on steroids compared with 35% of those who had no such treatment (p = 0.0035). The fractures were more likely to be multiple in patients on corticosteroids (p = 0.0042). However, if the relationship between bone density and fracture is investigated by plotting the cumulative prevalence of fracture against the bone density, measured by T score, the median BMD for fractures actually was marginally lower in patients on steroids, -2.74 (95% confidence interval [CI], -2.77 to -2.70) compared with -2.65 (95% CI, -2.66 to -2.65) in those who had not received steroids. Our results fail to support the notion that the fracture threshold is altered in patients on long-term steroids and suggest that the same diagnostic criteria should be used for osteoporosis in patients whether or not they are taking corticosteroid therapy.

Prediction of fracture from low bone mineral density measurements overestimates risk

There is a well-established relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk. Estimates of the relative risk of fracture from BMD have been derived mainly from short-term studies in which the correlation between BMD at assessment and BMD in later life ranged from 0.8 to 0.9. Because individuals lose bone mineral at different rates throughout later life, the long-term predictive value of low BMD is likely to decrease progressively with time. This article examines and formalizes the relationship between current BMD, correlation coefficients, and long-term risk. The loss of predictive value has important implications for early assessment and supports the view that measurements should be optimally targeted at the time interventions are contemplated and, when necessary, repeated in later life.

Cross-sectional assessment of age-related bone loss in men: the MINOS study

There are few data on osteoporosis in men, but cross-sectional studies have shown that age-related bone loss in men is of lower magnitude than in women. To elucidate some controversies related partially to methodological aspects, we measured bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) at various skeletal sites (spine, hip, and whole body using a Hologic QDR-1500 device; forearm using an Osteometer DTX 100 device) in a large cohort of 1040 men, aged 19-85 years. The final investigation was performed on 934 men, aged 19-85 years, after exclusion of 106 men with disease or treatment known to affect bone metabolism. Peak BMD was achieved at 25 and 29 years at the lumbar spine and hip, respectively, but only at 40 and 37 years at the distal forearm and whole body, respectively. The magnitude of bone loss between peak bone mass and 80 years of age was linear at most sites and averaged 13%-18%; that is, SD of 1.1-1.8 from peak BMD, except for Ward's triangle, which showed a marked bone loss of 43% (i.e., 2.5 SD), and for the lumbar spine. In the entire cohort, increase of the average lumbar spine BMD after the age of 55 years was related to the development of osteoarthritis, because, in men without severe arthritis, lumbar spine BMD continued to decrease. Height-adjusted partial correlations indicate that both the mineral content and the area of long bones of the limbs increased with age up to 50 years, followed by a significant decrease of BMD without change of bone surface. SD of mean BMD increased significantly with age at most skeletal sites. In summary, age-related change of BMD varied according to skeletal site in men with peak bone mass achieved earlier at sites rich in trabecular bone than at those rich in cortical bone. Bone loss varied according to skeletal site from 14% to 43%. The variability of BMD increased with age, which may reflect interindividual variability of age-related bone loss.

An update on the diagnosis of osteoporosis

In 1994 the World Health Organization (WHO) proposed guidelines for the diagnosis of osteoporosis based on measurement of bone mineral density. These guidelines have been widely used for epidemiologic studies, clinical research, and treatment strategies. This update reviews the recent literature that has highlighted the strengths and weaknesses of diagnostic thresholds.

Lumbar vertebral body compressive strength evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography, and ashing

Bone densitometry with DXA (dual energy X-ray absorptiometry) and QCT (quantitative computed tomography) techniques are used for in vivo assessment of bone strength and thereby prediction of fracture risk. However, only few in vitro studies have investigated and compared these techniques' ability to determine vertebral compressive strength. The aim of the present study was to (1) assess the predictive value of DXA, QCT, and pQCT (peripheral QCT) for vertebral bone compressive strength assessed by mechanical testing; (2) describe both linear and power relationship between density and strength; and (3) evaluate whether gender-related differences in the above relations were present. The material comprised human lumbar vertebrae L3 from 51 women and 50 men (age range: 18 to 96 years). The study showed that both DXA and CT techniques (QCT and pQCT) have a high predictive value for vertebral strength. The DXA BMD had a high correlation with maximum compressive load (r2 = 0.86). The QCT and pQCT had high correlations with maximum compressive stress (r2 = 0.75 and r2 = 0.86, respectively). The correlation between ash density of the biomechanically tested specimen and maximum compressive stress was r2 = 0.88. There were no differences between linear and power fit in the degree of determination between density and strength. There was no gender-related difference in the relationship between volumetric density and maximum compressive stress. In conclusion, it was demonstrated that DXA, QCT, and pQCT are ex situ equally capable of predicting vertebral compressive strength with a degree of determination (r2) between 75% and 86%. No differences were found between linear and power analysis of the relationship between density and strength, and no difference was found in the density strength relationship between women and men.

Degenerative lumbar listhesis and bone mineral density in elderly women. The study of osteoporotic fractures

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional and prospective study.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association between lumbar listhesis in elderly white women and bone mineral density at the spine, hip, radius, and calcaneus.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Several types of degenerative spinal changes have been found to be associated with high bone mineral density at the spine and other body sites.

METHODS

Lateral radiographs of the lumbar spine for 1400 elderly women enrolled in the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures were digitized. Listhesis (antero and retro) was assessed at L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1. Bone mineral density was measured at the spine, hip, calcaneus, and the distal and proximal radius.

RESULTS

After adjusting the data for age and body mass index, retrolisthesis at L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1 was associated with mean spinal bone mineral density levels that were 9% to 13% higher compared with those levels in women with no listhesis (P < 0.0001). In addition, bone mineral density at the hip and appendicular sites increased from 4% to 9%. The mean lumbar spinal bone mineral density of women with anterolisthesis at L3-L4 was 12% higher (P < 0.05) than that of women with no listhesis; it was the same for both groups at L4-L5 and was 7% lower (P < 0.005) at L5-S1. At L5-S1 the bone mineral density level at the hip and appendicular sites was also lower among the women with anterolisthesis at that level.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that retrolisthesis, like other spinal degenerative diseases, is associated with increased spinal bone mineral density. Anterolisthesis, however, may involve a different etiology, because its association with bone mineral density varies by spinal level.

Risk factors for reduced bone density in haemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Renal osteodystrophy may result in considerable morbidity for patients with end-stage renal disease. Secondary hyperparathyroidism, adynamic bone disease and osteomalacia, the main bony problems in chronic renal failure, may all be responsible for a reduction in bone mineral density (BMD). This can result in an increased fracture risk. By virtue of their age, post-menopausal status (in women), sedentary life-style and treatment (including previous corticosteroids), haemodialysis patients may be expected also to be at risk for developing osteoporosis, but little is known about the relative importance of these factors.

METHODS

We report a prospective study examining the prevalence of reduced bone mineral density (BMD) and its association with a wide range of factors, in a heterogenous group of 88 chronic haemodialysis patients. Femoral neck and lumbar BMD were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify risk factors associated with low bone mass.

RESULTS

Forty three patients (48.9%) had reduced BMD, and in 17 (19.3%) BMD was below the fracture threshold as defined on DXA measurements by the World Health Organization (WHO). The BMD had significant negative associations with age, serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels, current gastric acid suppression therapy, female gender, age at menarche and history of previous fracture. Positive associations were found with weight, haemoglobin concentration, average serum phosphate, weekly heparin dose, oral calcium supplementation and history of parathyroidectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

We have confirmed the importance of PTH-related bone disease in affecting BMD in haemodialysis patients, but have found that some other factors, which are known to be risk factors for osteoporosis, are also important.

Vitamin D insufficiency increases bone turnover markers and enhances bone loss at the hip in patients with established vertebral osteoporosis

AIM

The aim of this study was to determine whether the presence of vitamin D insufficiency increases bone turnover and enhances bone loss by examining the relationship between bone turnover markers and Bone mineral density (BMD) in vitamin D insufficient and vitamin D sufficient patients, with established vertebral osteoporosis.

SUBJECTS

119 consecutive, active, community dwelling, elderly women were assessed over a 7-month period between the months of March to October.

RESULTS

There was a significant correlation between parathyroid hormone (PTH) and 25 hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), r = - 0. 42 (P < 0.01). The prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency was 26.9% (defined by a 25(OH)D >/= 6.1 microg/l and </= 12 microg/l). This resulted in a statistically significant increase in bone turnover markers compared to the vitamin D sufficient group: bone alkaline phosphatase (P < 0.05), osteocalcin (P < 0.01), hydroxyproline (P < 0.05), free deoxypyridinoline (P < 0.05) and lower bone mineral density at the total hip (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that there is a high prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency in the active community dwelling elderly with established vertebral osteoporosis presenting to clinical attention, which leads to increased bone turnover, decreased BMD at the hip and thus enhanced risk of further osteoporotic fractures in comparison with vitamin D sufficient subjects.

Usefulness of quantitative heel ultrasound compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in determining bone mineral density in chronic haemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Reduced bone mineral density (BMD) is associated with renal osteodystrophy and osteoporosis in end-stage renal failure patients. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the standard non-invasive method to assess BMD, but is not always widely available. Quantitative heel ultrasound (QUS) is a mobile, relatively inexpensive, easy to perform and radiation-free method which can predict fractures to the same extent as DXA. This study assessed the usefulness of QUS vs DXA in determining BMD in chronic haemodialysis patients.

METHODS

Patients had their BMD at the hip and spine measured by DXA (Lunar Expert). QUS of the left heel (McCue CubaClinical II machine) measured broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and velocity of sound (VOS). Correlations between DXA and QUS parameters were calculated. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted for BUA and VOS and used to define cut-off points for calculating sensitivities and specificities for BUA and VOS. Femoral neck BMD was applied as the standard for diagnosing osteoporosis (T< or =-2.5) and osteopaenia (T>-2.5 and < or =-1) by WHO criteria.

RESULTS

Eighty eight patients (45.5% women), mean age 58+/-17 years, were studied. A total of 19% and 49% had femoral neck BMDs in the 'osteoporosis' and 'osteopaenia' ranges, respectively. There were good correlations between hip BMD and QUS parameters (r=0.68-0.79, P<0.001). Areas under the ROC curves for BUA and VOS in diagnosing 'osteoporosis' were 0.86 and 0.80, respectively. BUA and VOS had sensitivities of 76 and 71% and specificities of 80 and 69%, respectively, for diagnosing 'osteoporosis'. The positive predictive values for BUA and VOS were 48 and 35%, respectively, and the negative predictive values were 93 and 91% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

DXA and QUS parameters were significantly correlated. However, sensitivities and specificities of QUS parameters were not sufficiently high for QUS to be used simply as an alternative to DXA. The relatively high negative predictive values suggest that QUS may reliably screen out patients unlikely to have a BMD in the osteoporotic range. The relatively low positive predictive values, however, mean that subjects classified as osteoporotic using QUS require further investigations such as DXA to confirm the diagnosis.

Central region-of-interest analysis of lumbar spine densitometry demonstrates lower bone mass in older rhesus monkeys

Osteoarthritis (OA) spuriously elevates spine bone mineral density (BMD) as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). This study documents spinal OA prevalence in adult female rhesus monkeys, and evaluates a custom central region-of-interest (CROI) analysis technique designed to minimize OA effects on BMD measurement. Lumbar spine radiographs were obtained on 71 animals, age 10-37 years. OA degree was blindly scored as none, minimal, or moderate/severe. Moderate/severe OA was not observed before age 19, but was present in 66% of older animals. Subsequently, lumbar spine (L2-4) BMD was determined by standard DXA analysis and manual placement of 0.92 cm2 CROIs in two groups of female rhesus monkeys. One group (eight control, eight postovariectomy, ages 10-19 years) was assessed longitudinally, the second (n = 90, ages 10-37) cross-sectionally. Measured bone loss following ovariectomy (8.1% standard analysis, 11.5 % CROI) was comparable with both techniques. By contrast, CROI demonstrated lower bone mass with age (p < 0.0001), whereas only a trend (p = 0.06) was observed with standard analysis. When World Health Organization criteria were applied, 42% of animals > or = age 19 years were classified as osteopenic/osteoporotic by standard analysis compared with 67% by CROI. All "normal" animals reclassified as osteopenic/osteoporotic by CROI had OA. In conclusion, female rhesus monkeys often develop spinal OA with advancing age. CROI analysis demonstrated lower bone density in older monkeys and was as sensitive to estrogen-depletion bone loss as standard methodology. This suggests that alternative analysis techniques, such as CROI, may be more appropriate to evaluate bone density in nonhuman primates, and potentially in people.

Urinary bone resorption markers in monitoring treatment of symptomatic osteoporosis

We have studied the clinical usefulness of urinary bone resorption markers in postmenopausal women with symptomatic osteoporosis. The study design is a randomised double-blind placebo controlled study, in which the subjects were daily treated for 24 months either with a hormone analogue (2.5 mg Livial, generic name Tibolone, Organon, Amsterdam, Holland) plus 800 mg calcium (n = 14, age 63+/-5 years, range 52-68 years), or with placebo plus 800 mg calcium (n = 19, age 66+/-7 years, range 50-75 years). The laboratory methods for urinary bone resorption markers were enzyme immunoassays (EIA) for urinary pyridoline (PYD) and deoxypyridoline crosslinks (DPD), and for cross-linked N-telopeptides of Type I Collagen (NTx), and an HPLC assay for urinary hydroxyproline (HOP). All the urine assay results were calculated per mmol creatinine. All the resorption markers decreased during the two-year study period in both groups. The Z scores (discriminating power, i.e. ability of the different tests to distinguish the hormone treated subjects from the placebo treated subjects) for HOP and PYD were rather low: 0.06-1.52 for HOP and 0.68-1.47 for PYD. The differences between the two treatment groups were statistically significant for DPD at 12 and 24 months of treatment (P = 0.0471 and P = 0.0466, respectively), the Z scores ranging 0.45-1.90. NTx showed the most prominent decrease from the beginning of the study especially in the hormone treatment group: the differences between the two treatment groups were statistically highly significant for NTx already at 6 months of treatment (P = 0.0015), and the Z scores remained high ranging 2.11-3.82 throughout the two-year study period. Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine and femoral neck did not show statistically significant differences between the two treatment groups throughout the two-year study period. After 2 years there was, however, a significant increase in bone density both in the spine (+ 6.6%, P = 0.0002) and in the femoral neck (+ 3.4%, P = 0.0389) in the women with hormone treatment. In the control group a significant increase (+ 5.1%, P = 0.0012) in the spine, whereas a non-significant decrease (-1.5%, n.s.) in the femoral neck was observed. We suggest that measurement of urinary cross-linked peptides derived from Type I collagen (NTx and DPD) might be a useful biochemical method of observing the positive clinical effect (i.e. reduction in bone resorption) following hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal fracture patients.

A comparison of radial peripheral quantitative computed tomography, calcaneal ultrasound, and axial dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements in women aged 45-55 yr

Perimenopausal bone loss is considered to affect trabecular bone preferentially. Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) quantifies trabecular bone mineral density (BMD) independently at the ultradistal radius. This article examines differences in pQCT BMD between late premenopausal and early postmenopausal women, comparing the differences with calcaneal ultrasound and axial dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements. One hundred nineteen normal perimenopausal women aged 45-55 yr who attended a randomized osteoporosis screening program were stratified by menopausal status into premenopausal (PRE: n = 79) and postmenopausal (POST: n = 40) groups. All measurements were lower in the postmenopausal group with the exception of ultrasonic velocity (PRE vs POST: 1397 +/- 53.8 vs 1421 +/- 58.5 m/s, p = 0.037). Total (391.8 +/- 52.9 vs 366.3 +/- 68.6 g/cm(3), p = 0.013) and subcortical (533.6 +/- 59.4 vs 504.3 +/- 79.8 g/cm(3) p = 0.018), but not trabecular (187.5 +/- 38.8 vs 173.2 +/- 46.6 g/cm(3), p = 0. 098) or cortical (561 +/- 53.4 vs 551.2 +/- 66 g/cm(3), p = 0.174), pQCT BMD measurements were significantly lower in the POST group, as were ultrasonic attenuation (79.4 +/- 16 vs 72.3 +/- 18.0 dB/Mz, p = 0.034), DXA spine (1.032 +/-16 vs 0.959 +/- 0.2 g/cm(2), p = 0.003), and all hip (p </= 0.001) measurements. Although body mass index (BMI) was positively and menopausal status and age negatively correlated with most bone mass measurements, adjusting for BMI did not alter the relative deficits in postmenopausal compared with premenopausal women. This study suggests that early postmenopausal bone loss at the radius preferentially affects subcortical, rather than trabecular, bone in the appendicular skeleton, which suggests preferential trabecular bone loss in the axial skeleton.

Bone density and fracture risk in men

We evaluated different definitions of osteoporosis in a population-based sample of 348 men (age 22-90 years) compared with 351 women (age 21-93 years). Thirty-six men (10%) and 46 women (13%) had a history of osteoporotic fracture (hip, spine, or distal forearm due to moderate trauma at >/= age 35). In logistic regression analysis, osteoporotic fracture risk was associated with bone mineral density (BMD) at all sites (neck, trochanter, total hip, lumbar spine, and total wrist) in both genders (p < 0.001) except spinal BMD in men. After adjusting for age, total hip BMD was the strongest predictor of fracture risk in women (odds ratio [OR] per 1 SD decline, 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-3.7), while wrist BMD was best in men (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.0). Among men but not women, bone mineral apparent density (BMAD) was a better predictor of fracture than BMD (wrist BMAD OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3-2.3). Hip BMD/BMAD decreased linearly from age 20 years onward in both genders, while spinal BMD/BMAD declined after age 40 in women but not in men. In both genders, total wrist BMD/BMAD decreased after age 50. By World Health Organization criteria, the age-adjusted prevalence of osteoporosis at the hip, spine, or wrist was 35% among women >/=50 years of age. A similar approach (BMD > 2.5 SD below the young male mean) produced an osteoporosis prevalence rate in men >/=50 years of age of 19%. Thus, bone density predicts fracture risk in men as it does in women, and the prevalence of osteoporosis in men, using sex-specific normal values, is substantial. These observations indicate a need for better prevention and treatment strategies for men.

Vertebral bone density evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography in vitro

Vertebral bone density is evaluated mainly by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) or quantitative computed tomography (QCT). Densitometry is used as an estimator of bone strength and forms the basis for choice of treatment. DXA expresses bone density in grams per square centimeter (area density) and QCT expresses bone density in milligrams per cubic centimeter (volumetric density). The aim of this study was to identify the differences between the two techniques, DXA and QCT, when applied to a group of female and male subjects over a wide age range. The data consisted of 221 lumbar vertebral bodies (L3 and L4) excised at autopsy. There were 90 females with a mean age of 65.6 (range 18-94) years and 131 males with a mean age of 62.0 (range 21-94) years. The vertebrae were scanned en bloc in demineralized water in Plexiglas containers with both DXA and QCT. DXA was performed using posteroanterior (PA) and lateral projection. QCT was performed in the center of each vertebra with 1 cm slice thickness. Both methods showed decreasing bone density with age. Lateral DXA showed a decrease in bone density with age from approximately 0.8 g/cm2 to approximately 0.4 g/cm2. QCT showed a decrease in bone density with age from approximately 180 mg/cm3 to approximately 30 mg/cm3. Lateral DXA bone mineral densities (BMD) were correlated with QCT densities in both females (r2 = 0.68, p < 0.00001) and males (r2 = 0.53, p < 0.00001), but females had constantly lower DXA BMDs than males at a given QCT density. QCT and width-adjusted midlateral DXA (g/cm3) were significantly correlated, with r2 = 0.64 (p < 0.00001) for females and r2 = 0.61 (p < 0.00001) for males. In conclusion, age- and gender-related differences in human vertebral bone density were shown to be dependent on the scanning method used. DXA bone mineral content (BMC) and BMD showed that females had lower values than males at all ages. When the "volumetric" DXA measurements and QCT were used, the females had the highest densities in the younger decades and males had the highest densities in the oldest decades. Finally, the area density (BMD) measured by DXA was lower in females than in males with identical QCT volumetric bone densities.

Factors influencing lumbar spine bone mineral density assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: comparison with lumbar spinal radiogram

A study was conducted to determine the effect of radiographic findings of lumbar spinal changes upon bone mineral density measurements obtained by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Four hundred subjects were chosen from among 1543 community residents, aged 40-79 years. Study groups of 50 subjects each were selected by sex and 10-year age groups. This study investigated 390 of the 400 subjects who agreed to the conduct of spine bone mineral density measurement and spinal radiography. Lumbar spine radiograms were examined for findings of osteophyte formation, facet joint osteoarthritis, vertebral fracture, and aortic calcification. The prevalence of osteophyte formation, facet joint osteoarthritis, vertebral fracture, and aortic calcification increased with age in both men and women. On multiple regression analysis, bone mineral density was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in subjects with osteophyte formation or facet joint osteoarthritis than in those without these conditions, while bone mineral density was significantly lower in subjects with vertebral fracture. This study demonstrated that osteophyte formation, facet joint osteoarthritis, and vertebral fracture should be taken into account in the evaluation of bone mineral density by DXA in people in older age groups, since these conditions occur at a considerable rate in such subjects.

Diagnosis of osteoporosis in clinical practice

Measurement of bone mineral density is the basis of the diagnosis of osteoporosis. The risk of fracture increases with decreasing bone mineral density, which can be measured using several different techniques. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry is the most commonly used technique today. A further facility of the new bone densitometry technology is the option for vertebral morphometry. There are errors of accuracy in all bone densitometry techniques and also in the interpretation of the data they provide. Ultrasound of bone may provide new measures of bone fragility. Broadband ultrasound attenuation of the calcaneus predicts the risk of hip fracture in elderly women almost or equally as well as bone densitometry. Ultrasound does not expose to radiation and the equipment is portable. However, bone ultrasound cannot replace bone densitometry. Biochemical bone markers do not differentiate osteoporotic patients from healthy adults. However, they can be useful in deciding on interventions and in monitoring the efficacy of treatment. Their predictive value in individuals suffers from large variability. Biochemistry is widely used in the differential diagnosis of secondary osteoporosis. Suspicion of osteomalacia or an invasive process in the bone marrow are the most common indications for bone biopsy. Finally, although history and physical examination are insufficient in diagnosing primary osteoporosis, they are important in targeting other investigations to exclude secondary forms of osteoporosis.

A population-based study of bone mineral density in women with longstanding type 1 (insulin dependent) diabetes

This study aimed to explore multiple determinants of BMD (bone mineral density) in 99 women with long-standing type 1 diabetes, recruited from a population based register of insulin users. BMD was measured using DEXA (dual energy X-ray absorptiometry) at the femoral neck and lumbar spine, age adjusted Z scores were calculated and results compared to those of healthy volunteers. The median age of diabetic subjects was 42 years and the median duration of diabetes was 27 years. BMD was positively associated with body mass index and height at both the lumbar spine and femoral neck. There was a positive association with oral contraceptive pill use and lumbar spine BMD, and peripheral vascular disease was negatively associated with femoral neck BMD. No correlation was seen with either age or duration of diabetes and absolute BMD values. Mean Z score at the femoral neck was -0.12 (95% confidence interval -0.37 to +0.12). At the lumbar spine, the corresponding value was -0.21 (-0.44 to +0.02). Pre- and post-menopausal values for the diabetic subjects and healthy volunteers were found to be similar. In summary, axial BMD values in subjects with long-standing diabetes were similar to those observed in healthy non diabetic populations.

Epidemiology of spinal osteoporosis

Approximately 30% of postmenopausal white women in the United States have osteoporosis, and 16% have osteoporosis of the lumbar spine in particular. Bone density of the spine is positively associated with greater height and weight, older age at menopause, a history of arthritis, more physical activity, moderate use of alcoholic beverages, diuretic treatment, and current estrogen replacement therapy, whereas later age at menarche and a maternal history of fracture are associated with lower levels of density. Low bone density leads to an increased risk of osteoporotic fractures. Fracture risk also increase with age. Vertebral fractures affect approximately 25% of postmenopausal women, although the exact figure depends on the definition used. Recent data show that vertebral fracture rates are as great in men as in women but, because women live longer, the lifetime risk of a vertebral fracture from age 50 onward is 16% in white women and only 5% in white men. Fracture rates are less in most nonwhite populations, but vertebral fractures are as common in Asian women as in those of European heritage. Other risk factors for vertebral fractures are less clear but include hypogonadism and secondary osteoporosis; obesity is protective of fractures as it is of bone loss. Compared with hip fractures, vertebral fractures are less disabling and less expensive, costing approximately $746 million in the United States in 1995. However, they have a substantial negative impact on the patient's function and quality of life. The adverse effects of osteoporotic fractures are likely to increase in the future with the growing number of elderly people.

What is the relationship between osteoarthritis and osteoporosis?

Several epidemiological studies have shown a lower incidence and prevalence of hip fractures in people with osteoarthritis (OA) and vice versa which has led to numerous studies examining the association between OA and osteoporosis more generally. There is felt to be an inverse relationship between these two diseases and the evidence for and against this association is discussed. The evidence for an association with osteoporosis is stronger for large joint OA than hand OA or primary generalized OA. A number of possible mechanisms for this association are discussed such as genetic factors, common risk factors, role of subchondral bone in cartilage damage and growth factors. The incidence and prevalence of one disease in the presence of the other is discussed. Despite the inverse relationship seen in some studies, there is currently no evidence that treatment of one disease can have a detrimental effect on the other.

Association of BsmI vitamin-D receptor gene polymorphism with combined bone mass in spine and proximal femur in Icelandic women

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether there is an association between BsmI-vitamin-D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphism and combined bone mass in the spine and proximal femur in a group of adult Icelandic women with high and low bone mineral density (BMD).

DESIGN

Comparison of distribution of VDR genotypes (BB, Bb and bb) and allele frequency (B and b) in two groups of women: a group with 'strong bones' with high BMD in both the spine and proximal femur (> 1 standard deviation [SD]) above the age-matched mean (n = 35) and a group with 'weak bones' with BMD > 1.5 SD below the age-matched mean at both sites using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.

SETTING

Iceland, a population with a mean calcium intake > 1000 mg day-1. The calcium intake in the study group was however not evaluated.

SUBJECTS

Eighty-three Icelandic women, aged 22-65, free of diseases affecting bone and not taking drugs affecting calcium or bone metabolism, recruited from women undergoing bone densitometry at the Reykjavik Hospital.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Frequency of VDR genotypes and alleles in the two groups.

RESULTS

The distribution of VDR genotypes was significantly different in the two groups (P < 0.01); the b allele frequency was 70% in the group with high BMD compared to 48.5% in the group with low BMD.

CONCLUSIONS

In this selected group of adult Icelandic women the b allele in the vitamin-D receptor gene seems to be associated with high bone mass in the spine and proximal femur.

Population-based geographic variations in DXA bone density in Europe: the EVOS Study. European Vertebral Osteoporosis

The purpose of this study was to investigate variations in bone density between 16 European populations, 13 of which were participants in the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study (EVOS). Men and women aged 50-80 years were recruited randomly from local population registers, stratified in 5-year age bands. The other three centres recruited similarly. Random samples of 20-100% of EVOS subjects were invited for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) densitometry of the lumbar spine and/or proximal femur using Hologic, Lunar or Norland pencil beam machines or, in one centre, a Sopha fan-beam machine. Cross-calibration of the different machines was undertaken using the European Spine Phantom prototype (ESPp). Highly significant differences in mean bone density were demonstrated between centres, giving rise to between centre SDs in bone density that were about a quarter of a population SD. These differences persisted when centres using Hologic machines and centres using Lunar machines were considered separately. The centres were ranked differently according to whether male or female subjects were being considered and according to site of measurement (L2-4, femoral neck or femoral trochanter). As expected, bone mineral density (BMD) had a curvilinear relationship with age, and apparent rates of decrease slowed as age advanced past 50 years in both sexes. In the spine, not only did male BMD usually appear to increase with age, but there was a highly significant difference between centres in the age effect in both sexes, suggesting a variability in the impact of osteoarthritis between centres. Weight was consistently positively associated with BMD, but the effects of height and armspan were less consistent. Logarithmic transformation was needed to normalize the regressions of BMD on the independent variates, and after transformation, all sites except the femoral neck in females showed significant increases in SD with age. Interestingly, the effect of increasing weight was to decrease dispersion in proximal femur measurements in both sexes, further accentuating the tendency in women for low body mass index to be associated with osteoporosis as defined by densitometry. It is concluded that there are major differences between BMD values in European population samples which, with variations in anthropometric variables, have the potential to contribute substantially to variations in rates of osteoporotic fracture risk in Europe.

Effect of three years of oral alendronate treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

OBJECTIVE

Oral alendronate sodium is a potent, specific inhibitor of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. To assess its efficacy and safety, a 3-year, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of 478 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis was conducted.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Subjects received either placebo, alendronate 5 or 10 mg/day for 3 years, or 20 mg/day for 2 years followed by 5 mg/day for 1 year (20/5 mg). All subjects received 500 mg/day of supplemental calcium. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

RESULTS

After 3 years, alendronate 10 mg induced marked increases in BMD of the lumbar spine (9.6 +/- 0.4%), femoral neck (4.7 +/- 0.7%) and trochanter (7.4 +/- 0.6%) (mean +/- SE; each P < or = 0.001) versus decreases of 0.8 to 1.6% with placebo. Progressive increases at these sites in the alendoronate 10 mg group were significant during both the second and third years. Alendronate 10 mg increased total body BMD (1.6 +/- 0.3%, P < or = 0.001), and prevented loss but did not increase BMD at the 1/3 forearm site. Alendronate 20/5 mg was no more effective, whereas alendronate 5 mg was significantly less effective than 10 mg at all sites. Bone turnover decreased to a stable nadir over 3 months for resorption markers (urine deoxypyridinoline) and over 6 months for formation markers (alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin). Mean loss of stature was reduced by 41% in alendronate treated subjects (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The safety profile of alendronate was similar to that of placebo. At 10 mg, there were no trends toward increased frequency of any adverse experience except for abdominal pain, which was usually mild, transient, and resolved with continued treatment. Thus, alendronate appears to be an important advance in the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Bone mineral density measurements of distal radius in Saudi Arabian females

A survey using Gammadensit x-ray bone mineralometer was conducted on 150 Saudi Arabian postmenopausal (PM) females and on another group of 150 females of menstruating age of around 30 years as the group with peak bone mass (PBM). The minimum age in the PM group was 44 years and maximum was 71 years (mean 54.08 years), SD +/- 7.02, whereas for the PBM group, the mean age was 29.15 years (range 24 to 33). The bone mineral density (BMD) for the PM group was 0.310 g/cm(2) minimum and the maximum ws 0.546 g/cm(2) (mean 0.440 g/cm(2)). In the PBM group, the mean BMD was 0.660 g/cm(2). Compared to Western females, the PM group BMD was 21% lower and the Saudi PBM group was 29% higher than in Western females of the same age and sex. The BMD of rural Saudi females was 0.479 g/cm(2) as compared to 0.359 g/cm(2) in the urban population. In females who had borne more than 10 children, the BMD was 0.483 g/cm(2), and was 0.354 g/cm(2) in females who had fewer than five children. There was no statistical significance in rural versus urban and </= 5 versus >/= 10 children (P value was <0.18 and <0.13). This study concludes that BMD of the PM Saudi females is lower than that of the Western females of the same age, making them more osteoporotic with a higher risk of osteoporotic-related fractures.

Assessment of osteopenia from spine radiographs using two different methods: the Chingford Study

Two methods for diagnosing radiological osteopenia in thoracic (TS) and lumbar (LS) spine radiographs were assessed: a subjective conventional method (A) and a semiquantitative method (B), by comparing them with bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), in a population of "normal" women aged 45-70 years (n = 818). For both methods there was good intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility. BMDs were significantly lower with increasing radiological osteopenia grades (p < 0.001), and remained lower after adjustment for age and body mass index (p < 0.01). The proportion of subjects with DEXA-defined osteoporosis rose with increasing radiological osteopenia grades for both methods. The worst osteopenia categories identified 29.7-55.3% of women with DEXA-defined osteoporosis, compared with 6.1-11.7% in the "normal" categories. Both methods, however, showed a large degree of overlap of BMDs between the various radiological osteopenia grades. The sensitivity and specificity of method A in diagnosing osteoporosis were 45.3% and 78.4%, respectively, for the TS and 19.0% and 94.3%, respectively, for the LS. For method B the sensitivities and specificities were 8.8% and 96.1%, respectively (TS), and 10.2% and 95.6%, respectively (LS). Although both methods have poor sensitivities, "definite" or "high" grade osteopenia should be an indication for bone densitometry. The high specificities suggest that a "normal" (no osteopenia) X-ray is unlikely to have a significantly low BMD.

The relationship between degenerative changes and osteoporosis in the lumbar spine

Degenerative changes in the spine, specifically disc degeneration and facet arthrosis, and osteoporosis are conditions that primarily affect the elderly and may significantly impact the quality of life. The relationship between osteoporosis and degenerative changes in the hip joint has been studied, but their correlation in the spine is not entirely clear. Two hundred ninety-four subjects older than 50 years of age were retrospectively studied for the existence of lumbar spinal degeneration and osteoporosis through radiologic examination for 3 clinical manifestations: (1) disc degeneration, (2) facet joint arthrosis, and (3) lumbar osteoporosis. Peripheral osteoporosis in the distal radius of the nondominant hand was measured using a single-photon bone absorptiometer. Results indicated that subjects with severe osteoporosis in the distal radius also had severe degenerative changes in the discs and the facets; those with mild osteoporosis in the distal radius showed a tendency to have a lesser degree of degenerative changes than the subjects without osteoporosis.

Lateral bone density measurements in osteoarthritis of the lumbar spine

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether spinal osteoarthritis (OA) is responsible for the common finding that lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) is greater when measured in the anteroposterior plane than when measured in the lateral plane.

METHODS

We studied lateral spine radiographs from 63 women who attended a hospital outpatient department for bone density measurement and who also underwent lumbar spine radiography. Osteoarthritis was assessed using both the Kellgren and Lawrence scale and a scoring system for osteophytosis. Bone density was measured in the anteroposterior and lateral planes using a Hologic QDR-2000 instrument.

RESULTS

The mean anteroposterior BMD (0.92 g/cm2) was significantly greater than the lateral BMD (0.59 g/cm2) (p < 0.01), and the difference between antero-posterior and lateral measurements was significantly associated with both increasing Kellgren and Lawrence score and osteophyte score, even after adjustment for age.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that spinal OA is a major cause of the difference between anteroposterior and lateral BMD and that lateral BMD may provide a more accurate representation of true vertebral body bone density in patients with OA of the lumbar spine.

The impact of degenerative conditions in the spine on bone mineral density and fracture risk prediction

We examined the impact of degenerative conditions in the spine (osteophytosis and endplate sclerosis) and aortic calcification in the lumbar region on bone mineral content/density (BMC/BMD) measured in the spine and forearm by absorptiometry and on fracture risk prediction. The radiographs of 387 healthy postmenopausal women, aged 68-72 years, were assessed in masked fashion for the presence of osteophytosis, endplate sclerosis and aortic calcification in the region from L2 to L4. Vertebral deformities/fractures were assessed by different definitions. Osteophytes larger than 3 mm and in numbers of 3 or more resulted in a significantly (12%) higher spinal bone mass (p < 0.001). Endplate sclerosis had a similar effect (p < 0.001). In subjects with both degenerative conditions the BMC/BMD in the spine and forearm were significantly higher than in unaffected women (19% in the spine, 10% in the forearm; p < 0.001). The spinal BMD values were significantly lower in fractured women if both degenerative conditions were absent (p < 0.001), whereas fractured and unfractured women had similar values if degenerative conditions were present. Degenerative conditions did not alter the ability of forearm BMC to discriminate vertebral or peripheral fractures. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (true positive fraction versus false positive fraction) were generated for BMD of the lumbar spine and BMC of the forearm with regard to the discrimination between women with vertebral and peripheral fractures and healthy premenopausal women. The ROC curves for women without degenerative conditions were consistently above the curves for women affected by osteophytosis and endplate sclerosis in the lumbar spine (p < 0.001). In conclusion, osteophytes and endplate sclerosis have a considerable influence on spinal bone mass measurements in elderly postmenopausal women and affect the diagnostic ability of spinal scans to discriminate osteoporotic women. Our data suggest that in elderly women, unless the spine is radiologically clear of degenerative conditions, a peripheral measurement procedure should be considered an alternative for assessment of bone mineral content/density.

Prevalent vertebral deformities: relationship to bone mineral density and spinal osteophytosis in elderly men and women

The aims of this study were to ascertain vertebral deformity prevalence in elderly men and women and to describe the association between bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and femoral neck, severity of spinal degenerative disease and vertebral deformity prevalence. We performed standardized spinal radiographs in a random sample of 300 elderly men and women participating in the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study, a population-based study of fracture risk factors. Radiographs were read independently by masked observers for the prevalence of vertebral deformity and severity of osteophytosis. BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The prevalence of vertebral deformities was critically dependent on the criterion used. The less strict criteria seemed to overestimate deformities at either end of the spine region analysed. However, irrespective of the criterion used, prevalence of deformity was higher in men than in women (25% vs 20% for the 3 SD criterion, 17% vs 12% for the 4 SD criterion and 27% vs 25% for the 25% criterion). Femoral neck BMD was more strongly associated with vertebral deformities than spinal BMD for the 25% criterion (OR/SD change in BMD 1.39 (p = 0.02) vs 1.20 (p = 0.19)), 3 SD criterion (OR/SD change in BMD 1.45 (p = 0.01) vs 1.10 (p = 0.34)) and 4 SD criterion (OR/SD change in BMD 1.98 (p = 0.0002) vs 1.68 (p = 0.008)). BMD was also more strongly associated with biconcave deformities than either wedge or crush deformities and more so in men than in women. Severity of spinal osteophytosis was not associated with vertebral deformity. In conclusion, femoral neck BMD is at least equivalent to the lumbar spine BMD in strength of association with prevalent vertebral fractures. Spinal osteophytosis falsely elevates BMD without a concomitant decrease in fracture risk, indicating that any interpretation of spinal BMD needs to be adjusted for osteophytosis. These findings support the use of femoral neck bone densitometry in older men and women. Moreover, these data indicate that current criteria for radiological assessment of vertebral deformity are sufficiently loose to include a substantial proportion of non-fractures in the elderly, with important implications for the design of clinical trials. However, irrespective of the criterion used, vertebral deformities in men are at least as common, if not more so, than in women, suggesting that vertebral osteoporotic fractures are overlooked in men.

Lateral spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral measurement with fan-beam design: effect of osteophytic calcifications on lateral and anteroposterior spine BMD

Recently, fan beam (FB) designs have been made available by several manufacturers (Aloka, Hologic Lunar and Sophar) to measure lumbar spine bone mineral area density (BMD) in both an anteroposterior (AP) and a lateral projection. The present study was performed to evaluate some characteristics of a new dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) system for supine lateral scans in normals and to study possible advantages for patients with osteophytic calcifications (OC). The precision errors of in vitro and in vivo measurements were estimated by an anthropomorphic phantom and in healthy volunteers. To study the effect of osteoarthritic changes on AP and lateral DXA measurements, BMC (bone mineral content) and BMD were measured in age-matched women (n = 150) with and without OC. Precision errors for lateral BMD in vitro over 1 and 6 months were 0.58/0.67% (slow/fast scan modes) and 0.67/0.77% (slow/fast scan modes), respectively. The short- and mid-term reproducibility of BMD values were 2% and 3.5%, respectively, using the compare function (3.5% and 7.5%, respectively, without the compare facility). The analysis of women with and without OC (n = 150) demonstrated higher mean values for AP BMD (0.892 +/- 0.145 g/cm2) in patients with OC (n = 75) than in normals (0.836 +/- 0.135 g/cm2, n = 75, difference 6.3%). For lateral scans, BMD differed to a minor degree (3.1%) in patients with OC (0.629 +/- 0.133 g/cm2) compared with normals (0.610 +/- 0.117 g/cm2). Corresponding results were obtained in fast FB mode. Furthermore, we found significant (P < 0.0001) correlations between BMD in lateral and AP scans in patients without OC (r = 0.63) and in patients with OC (r = 0.57). Although the FB design facilitated fast AP and lateral scans, the higher precision errors of lateral scans could limit its application in longitudinal studies. The use of compare function should be recommended. However, BMD of lateral scans was less influenced by OC.

Bone mineral density and bone turnover in spinal osteoarthrosis

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether there was a generalised increase in bone mineral density (BMD) in spinal osteoarthrosis (OA), and to determine the mechanism of this possible protection against osteoporosis as assessed by biochemical markers of bone turnover.

METHODS

We studied 375 women (ages 50 to 85) from a population based group. Spinal OA was defined from radiographs as the presence of degenerative changes affecting intervertebral or facet joints. BMD of the lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN) and total body (TB) was measured by dual energy x ray absorptiometry (Lunar DPX). Bone turnover rates were estimated from measurement of biochemical markers of bone formation and resorption (urine deoxypyridinoline (Dpyr) and serum bone specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP)).

RESULTS

BMD at each site was greater in the women with spinal OA (mean increase in LS-BMD 7.9%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0 to 15.1; TB-BMD 8.4%, 95% CI 1.9 to 9.7; FN-BMD 6.4%, 95% CI 0.3 to 12.6). Twenty four hour urinary excretion of Dpyr, corrected for TB bone mineral content, and serum BAP were 19% lower in the women with spinal OA (95% CI for Dpyr 4.3 to 31.9%; for BAP 6.3 to 32.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal OA is associated with a generalised increase in BMD and a decreased rate of bone turnover. This suggests that the protective effect of spinal OA against osteoporosis may be mediated by decreased bone turnover.

The contribution of vitamin D receptor gene alleles to the determination of bone mineral density in normal and osteoporotic women

Bone mass and its mineral content are under genetic control. The vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene has been shown to be a major locus for genetic effects on bone mineral density (BMD), and polymorphisms in this gene accounted for a large proportion of genetic variance in BMD in an Australian population. In this study, we investigated whether similar associations are present in a North American population. We studied 139 normal healthy women (age 53.2 +/- 14.5, mean +/- SD) and 43 severely osteoporotic postmenopausal women (age 65.8 +/- 5.9). In the 127 of them with complete genetic studies, the distribution of genotypes, determined by polymerase chain reaction on leukocyte DNA samples, agreed closely with that in the Australian population. BMD was strongly related to age and weight, and, thus was adjusted for these parameters prior to genetic analysis. We found that age modulated the effect of VDR genotypes on femoral neck BMD (FN-BMD) (TaqI, p = 0.036; BsmI, p = 0.118; ApaI, p = 0.041) such that the effect of genotype was greatest among younger (premenopausal) women and declined with age so that there was no discernible difference by age 70. Among the younger women, a high FN-BMD was associated with the TT (or aa or bb) genotype while low FN-BMD was associated with the tt (or AA or BB) genotype.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Influence of vitamin D receptor genotype on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: a twin study in Britain

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the possible association between vitamin D receptor genotype and bone mineral density in a large group of postmenopausal twins.

DESIGN

Cross sectional twin study.

SETTING

Twin population based in Britain.

SUBJECTS

95 dizygotic (non-identical) pairs of twins and 87 monozygotic (identical) pairs of twins aged 50-69 years, postmenopausal, and free of diseases affecting bone, recruited from a national register of twins and with a media campaign.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Bone mineral density measured at the hip, lumbar spine, forearm, and for the whole body by dual energy x ray absorptiometry in relation to differences in the vitamin D receptor genotype.

RESULTS

At all sites the values of bone density among dizygotic twins were more similar in those of the same vitamin D receptor genotype than in those of differing genotype, and the values in the former were closer to the correlations seen in monozygotic twins. Women with the genotype that made them at risk of osteoporotic fracture had an adjusted bone mineral density that was significantly lower by SD 0.5 to 0.6 at the hip, lumbar spine, and for the whole body. The results could not be explained by differences in age, weight, years since menopause, or use of hormone replacement therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings that in postmenopausal women in Britain bone density-particularly at the hip and spine-is genetically linked and specifically associated with the vitamin D receptor genotypes should lead to novel approaches to the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.

Age changes of spine density in posterior-anterior and lateral projections in normal women

Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured in 353 healthy white women using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Measurements were made of both the posterior-anterior (PA) and lateral spine, as well as the proximal femur (neck and Ward's triangle). From age 50 to 80 years, the BMD of the PA spine and femur neck BMD had an 18% diminution (0.6%/year), and BMD of the lateral spine showed about a 35-40% decline (1.4%/year). The Ward's triangle region of the femur was not quite as decreased (30% or 1.1%/year). The BMD decrease associated with aging did not differ as much among sites when expressed relative to the intrapopulation variation rather than as a percentage. The Z-score for PA spine and femur neck BMD (-1.1) was significantly different than that for lateral spine BMD (-1.6); Ward's triangle was intermediate (-1.3), i.e., the lateral spine still showed the highest sensitivity to aging. However, the ability to detect age changes in an individual subject can be increased only if the precision error for lateral spine BMD is not increased to a greater extent than the sensitivity.

Effect of degenerative spinal and aortic calcification on bone density measurements in post-menopausal women: links between osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease?

The effect of spinal degenerative changes and aortic calcification on bone mineral density measurements was studied in 115 healthy early post-menopausal women. Lateral lumbar spine radiographs and quantitative computer tomography images were used to determine the presence and severity of aortic calcification and degenerative changes in the lumbar spine. Women with spinal degenerative calcification had higher spine bone density when measured by dual photon absorptiometry compared to those without calcification (P < 0.01), but this was not reflected by the quantitative computer tomography or the proximal femur bone densities, suggesting that spinal calcification artefactually increases spinal bone density when measured by dual photon techniques. Women with aortic calcification had significantly lower quantitative computer tomography and proximal femur bone density compared to those without calcification (both P < 0.05). These women may be at increased risk for both osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease, suggesting a common aetiological factor such as oestrogen deficiency.

Measurement of hand bone mineral content by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry: development of the method, and its application in normal volunteers and in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES--To develop a method of measuring hand bone mineral content (BMC) by dual energy x ray absorptiometry (DXA); to apply this method of measuring hand BMC to normal volunteers to ascertain causes of variability; and to measure hand BMC in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) of varying duration and severity. METHODS--The x ray beam of the Hologic QDR 1000 dual energy x ray absorptiometer was hardened by introducing a perspex-aluminium plate and the analysis software altered to allow for the small tissue bulk of the hand compared with the torso. Ninety five volunteers (46 men age 24-81 and 49 women age 20-83) had scans of both hands. Eight volunteers were assessed repeatedly to establish reproducibility and effect of hand position. Fifty six patients (22 men, 34 women, age range 25-86 years) with RA of differing duration and severity, had hand BMC measurement by DXA. RESULTS--The precision of BMC measurement was 2.3% with no additional variation due to hand position. Hand dominance had no significant effect on BMC. In men, hand BMC correlated with height (r = 0.57, p < 0.0001), weight (r = 0.58, p < 0.0001), forearm span (r = 0.5, p = 0.0006) and hand volume (r = 0.66, p < 0.0001). In women hand BMC correlated with height (r = 0.66, p < 0.0001), weight (r = 0.4, p = 0.003), forearm span (r = 0.3, p = 0.03) and hand volume (r = 0.49, p = 0.0008). After correcting for all these variables, male volunteers had significantly higher hand BMC than female volunteers (p = 0.01) and patients with RA had lower hand BMC than normal volunteers (total hand BMC in male volunteers 90.9 gms, 95% CI 86.9-95, in male patients 81.7 gms, 95% CI 73.7-89.6, p < 0.004, total hand BMC in female volunteers 62.2 gms 95% CI 59.8-64.5, female patients 52.3 gms, 95% CI 48.1-56.5, p < 0.005). In patients with RA, the hand BMC showed an inverse correlation with age (r = -0.44, p = 0.01), disease duration (r = -0.62, p = 0.0003), Larsen's grades (r = -0.62, p = 0.0002) and modified Sharp's method score (r = -0.69, p < 0.0001) in female patients only. CONCLUSIONS--A new, sensitive and reproducible technique of measurement of hand bone mineral content by DXA, has been developed and this method has been applied to normal volunteers and patients with RA. Hand dominance had no significant effect on hand BMC. After correcting for physical size, men have higher hand BMC than women. Hand BMC inversely correlates in women patients with disease duration and other validated methods of assessing radiological outcome in RA. Longitudinal studies are needed to establish its role in monitoring disease progression.

Progressive loss of bone in the femoral neck in elderly people: longitudinal findings from the Dubbo osteoporosis epidemiology study

OBJECTIVES

To determine prospectively the rates of change in bone mineral density in elderly people and to examine the relation between lifestyle and demographic factors and these rates of change.

DESIGN

Longitudinal population based study.

SETTING

Dubbo, New South Wales, Australia.

SUBJECTS

Representative sample (n = 769) of residents aged > or = 60 on 1 January 1989.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Rates of change in bone mineral density measured prospectively (mean scan interval 2.5 years) at the femoral neck and lumbar spine by dual energy x ray absorptiometry.

RESULTS

Summary rates of loss in the femoral neck were 0.96% per year (95% confidence interval 0.64% to 1.28%) in women and 0.82% per year (0.52% to 1.12%) in men. Importantly, rates of loss at the femoral neck (both percentage and absolute) increased in both sexes with advancing age. No significant loss was evident in either sex at the lumbar spine, probably because of coexistent osteoarthritis. Lifestyle factors had only modest effects on rates of loss at either site.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that bone density of the femoral neck declines at an increasing rate in elderly people, and as this site is predictive of fracture suggest that treatment to minimise bone loss may be important even in very elderly people.

Bone mineral density and risk factors for osteoporosis--a population-based study of 1600 perimenopausal women

Population-based epidemiological studies on osteoporosis are few. Our study evaluated the effects of menopause and certain putative behavioural risk factors on bone mineral density (BMD). Spinal and femoral neck BMD were measured with dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) from 1600 perimenopausal women aged 48-59 years (mean 53.2 years) with no diseases or medications known to affect bone metabolism. These women were a selected sample of the Kuopio Osteoporosis Risk Factor and Prevention Study population (n = 14,220). There was a wide variation of BMD among perimenopausal women. Menopause had a major effect on BMD. Postmenopausal women had significantly lower BMD in both spine (-6.2%) and femoral neck (-3.9%) as compared with premenopausal women. Multiple regression analysis showed that weight, menopausal status, age, and grip strength were significant independent predictors of both spinal and femoral BMD. Additionally, physical activity was found to be a significant predictor of femoral BMD, and alcohol consumption was a significant predictor of spinal BMD. However, current anthropometric and lifestyle factors explained only 18.7-25.4% of the variability of BMD. Therefore, the estimation of the risk factor status at menopause is not an adequate substitute for bone densitometry. However, our results may in part help clinicians to identify the risk groups at which to direct bone density measurements.

Bone mineral density and vertebral compression fracture rates in ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationship between disease severity and bone density as well as vertebral fracture risk in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

METHODS

Measurements were taken for bone mineral density (BMD) and vertebral fracture rates in 87 patients with AS. BMD was measured at the hip (femoral neck -FN), lumbar spine (L1-L4-LS) and for the whole body using a hologic-QDR-1000/W absorptiometer. An algorithm based on normal female ranges of vertebral heights was used to define a fracture as occurring when two vertebral ratios were each three standard deviations below the calculated mean of the controls.

RESULTS

Patients with AS had significantly lower FN-BMD in proportion to disease severity (based on a Schober index) and disease duration. LS-BMD was also reduced in early disease, but in patients with advanced AS it had increased considerably. Nine vertebral fractures (10.3%) were identified which was considerably higher than expected when compared with a fracture of 1.9% in a control population of 1035 females of a similar age range. Patients with AS with fractures were significantly older, more likely to be male, had longer disease duration and more advanced spinal limitation with less mobility. There was no significant reduction in lumbar spine or femoral neck bone density in the fracture group.

CONCLUSIONS

Vertebral fractures that result from osteoporosis are a feature of longstanding AS. BMD used as a measure of osteoporosis of the spine in advanced AS is unreliable probably as a result of syndesmophyte formation and does not predict the risk of vertebral fracture. Alternative sites such as the neck of the femur should be used for sequential assessment of BMD in AS.

The effect of rheumatoid arthritis and steroid therapy on bone density in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE

To assess bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the relative effects of disease activity, disability, and past and current use of corticosteroids.

METHODS

One hundred ninety-five postmenopausal patients with RA were compared with 597 post-menopausal control subjects. Bone density was measured at the lumbar spine and the proximal femur using dual x-ray absorptiometry. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to corticosteroid use, i.e., never users (61%), current users (21%), and ex-users (18%).

RESULTS

Compared with controls, the never users had no difference in BMD at the lumbar spine, but a 6.9% reduction at the femur (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 3.4-10.3%). In current users (mean daily prednisolone dosage 6.9 mg), BMD was reduced by 6.5% at the spine (95% CI 0-13.0%) and by 7.4% at the hip (95% CI 1.2-13.6%) compared with never users, after adjustment for age, weight, duration of menopause, and functional disability. Mean BMD was similar in the ex-user and never user groups. Results were confirmed in 54 patients who had whole-body BMD measurements. There were inverse correlations between BMD and Health Assessment Questionnaire scores (femoral BMD r = -0.23, P < 0.01; whole-body BMD r = -0.40, P < 0.01) and between BMD and cumulative steroid dose (femoral BMD r = -0.32, P < 0.01; whole-body BMD r = -0.72, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Osteoporosis in postmenopausal women with RA is more evident at the hip than the spine, and the most important determinants of bone loss are disability and cumulative corticosteroid dose. Low-dose steroids cannot be used with complacency, but recovery after discontinuation of use may be possible.