Interval cancers in a FOBT-based colorectal cancer population screening programme: implications for stage, gender and tumour site

Colorectal cancer screening by guaiac faecal occult blood test in France: Evaluation of the programme two years after launching

BACKGROUND

The French national screening programme for colorectal cancer (CRC) was rolled out nationwide from 2008. It targets men and women aged 50-74 who are invited every 2 years to perform a guaiac faecal occult blood test, followed, if positive, by a colonoscopy. This paper presents the evaluation of the programme for the 46 French districts that conducted a comprehensive screening campaign during 2008-2009, targeting 9.7 million people.

METHODS

National database gathering information on people who were screened was used to estimate indicators reflecting the programme performance.

RESULTS

Participation was 34.3%, with nearly three million people being tested. The percentage of positive tests was 2.8%. Completion of colonoscopies following a positive test was 88%. For men, 36.8% of the results of colonic explorations were normal, 40.1% were adenomas, and 9.0% were CRC, based on the most pejorative lesion. For women, corresponding figures were 55.9%, 25.7% and 5.8%. A CRC was detected for 7.5% of people who had a colonic exploration. The advanced adenoma detection rate among those screened was 4.9‰ and the CRC detection rate was 1.9‰. The description of CRC could only be made for 21 districts, for which 1441 invasive colonic adenocarcinomas were diagnosed; of these, 43% were stage I, 23% stage II, 25% stage III and 9% stage IV.

CONCLUSION

This first evaluation since the programme was rolled out provides an inventory of CRC screening in France and points out some improvements expected, especially in terms of participation which is below the European recommendations. Future evaluations will analyse trends in these indicators.

False negative fecal occult blood test may be associated with increased mortality from colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT) is an accepted screening test for colorectal cancer (CRC). It has been shown to decrease mortality by up to 30%. The outcome of screening failures has not been adequately studied.

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to assess the outcome of patients who were diagnosed with CRC after a false negative FOBT.

METHODS

We identified all consecutive CRCs from pathology reports between 2005 and 2010. Patients were divided according to their FOBT result. Those who became positive were compared to patients who remained negative.

RESULTS

Altogether 401 CRCs were identified. Of those, 202 never performed a FOBT. At least one negative FOBT was performed by 133 individuals (67%). Of these, 76 remained negative (false negatives, FN) and 57 became positive (positive conversion, PC, controls). The prevalence of metastatic disease was threefold higher among the FNs as compared to the PC group (16 [22.2%] vs. 4 [7.5%], P=0.022). All-cause mortality was also significantly higher among FNs versus PCs (24 [31.6%] vs. 5 [8.8%], P=0.001); in Cox regression analysis of survival (covariates: FNs vs. PC, gender, age, medications and co-morbidities) FNs had increased mortality compared to the PC (HR 2.929, P=0.033, CI 95% 1.092-7.858). No statistically significant difference was found regarding all primary end points when comparing the FN and the "No test" group.

CONCLUSION

These data disclose a particular risk of FOBT as a screening test. A subgroup of patients with "false" negative tests may have increased morbidity and mortality. Efforts should be made to recognize and characterize this high-risk group.

The National Health Service Bowel Cancer Screening Program: the early years

The National Health Service Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NHS BCSP) was developed to improve outcomes from colorectal cancer, the third most frequent cancer and the second highest cause of cancer deaths in the UK. Screening pilot programs were developed after previous trials demonstrated a reduction in mortality with the use of fecal occult blood population screening. A successful pilot period led to the roll out of national biennial screening for all 60-69 year olds in 2006, and extended to 60-74 year olds in 2010. To the end of 2012, there have been over 16 million invitations to screening, with uptake of 55.35%. FOBt positivity was 2.08%. Almost 15,000 cancers have been identified; screen-detected cancers have been shown to be at an earlier stage than non-screen-detected, with 35% Dukes' stage A. The BCSP provides high quality colonoscopy with low adverse events rates. It is also a rich data source for research.

Association between early stage colon neoplasms and false-negative results from the fecal immunochemical test

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) can identify patients with advanced colorectal neoplasms, but it also has a high rate of false-negative results. It would be helpful to characterize colorectal neoplasms that are not detected by FIT to aid in development of new tests. We characterized colorectal neoplasms from patients who had negative results from the FIT.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 18,296 subjects who were screened for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy and the FIT at the Health Management Center of National Taiwan University Hospital from September 2005 through September 2010. We identified 4045 subjects with colorectal neoplasms (3385 with nonadvanced adenomas, 632 with advanced adenomas, and 28 with cancer). We analyzed the sensitivity of the FIT in identifying these patients, along with information on lesion size, location, and morphology.

RESULTS

The FIT identified patients with nonadvanced adenomas, advanced adenomas, and cancer with sensitivity values of 10.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.2%-12.3%), 28.0% (95% CI, 24.6%-31.7%), and 78.6% (95% CI, 58.5%-91.0%), respectively. The FIT detected proximal advanced adenomas and nonpolypoid lesions with lower levels of sensitivity than distal advanced adenomas; it had a high false-negative rate in detection of adenomas <15 mm (adjusted odds ratio, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.79-4.54) and nonpolypoid adenomas (adjusted odds ratio, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.22-3.80), after adjusting for demographic characteristics, colonoscopy findings, and potential confounders. The FIT produced a higher percentage of false-negative results in detection of carcinoma in situ and T1 cancer than in T2-T4 cancers (66.7% sensitivity vs 100%; P = .049).

CONCLUSIONS

The FIT produces a high rate of false-negative results for patients with small or nonpolypoid adenomas. Early-stage cancers are associated with a high rate of false-negative results from the FIT.

The impact of aspirin, statins and ACE-inhibitors on the presentation of colorectal neoplasia in a colorectal cancer screening programme

Background:

There is increasing evidence that aspirin, statins and ACE-inhibitors can reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer. The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of these medications on an individual's risk of advanced neoplasia in a colorectal cancer screening programme.

Methods:

A prospectively maintained database of the first round of screening in our geographical area was analysed. The outcome measure was advanced neoplasia (cancer or intermediate or high risk adenomata).

Results:

Of the 4188 individuals who underwent colonoscopy following a positive occult blood stool test, colorectal pathology was present in 3043(73%). Of the 3043 patients with colorectal pathology, 1704(56%) had advanced neoplasia. Patients with advanced neoplasia were more likely to be older (OR 1.38; 95% CI 1.19–1.59) and male (OR 1.66; 95% CI 1.43–1.94) (both P<0.001). In contrast, those on aspirin (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.56–0.83), statins (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.55–0.78) or ACE inhibitors (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.57–0.89) were less likely to have advanced neoplasia at colonoscopy (all P<0.05).

Conclusion:

In patients undergoing colonoscopy following a positive occult blood stool test with documented evidence of aspirin, statin or ACE-inhibitor usage, advanced neoplasia is less likely, suggesting that the usage of these medications may have a chemopreventative effect.

The impact of age, sex and socioeconomic deprivation on outcomes in a colorectal cancer screening programme

Background

Population-based colorectal cancer screening has been shown to reduce cancer specific mortality and is used across the UK. Despite evidence that older age, male sex and deprivation are associated with an increased incidence of colorectal cancer, uptake of bowel cancer screening varies across demographic groups. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of age, sex and deprivation on outcomes throughout the screening process.

Methods

A prospectively maintained database, encompassing the first screening round of a faecal occult blood test screening programme in a single geographical area, was analysed.

Results

Overall, 395 096 individuals were invited to screening, 204 139 (52%) participated and 6 079 (3%) tested positive. Of the positive tests, 4 625 (76%) attended for colonoscopy and cancer was detected in 396 individuals (9%). Lower uptake of screening was associated with younger age, male sex and deprivation (all p<0.001). Only deprivation was associated with failure to proceed to colonoscopy following a positive test (p<0.001). Despite higher positivity rates in those that were more deprived (p<0.001), the likelihood of detecting cancer in those attending for colonoscopy was lower (8% most deprived vs 10% least deprived, p = 0.003).

Conclusion

Individuals who are deprived are less likely to participate in screening, less likely to undergo colonoscopy and less likely to have cancer identified as a result of a positive test. Therefore, this study suggests that strategies aimed at improving participation of deprived individuals in colorectal cancer screening should be directed at all stages of the screening process and not just uptake of the test.

Using resource modelling to inform decision making and service planning: the case of colorectal cancer screening in Ireland

Background

Organised colorectal cancer screening is likely to be cost-effective, but cost-effectiveness results alone may not help policy makers to make decisions about programme feasibility or service providers to plan programme delivery. For these purposes, estimates of the impact on the health services of actually introducing screening in the target population would be helpful. However, these types of analyses are rarely reported. As an illustration of such an approach, we estimated annual health service resource requirements and health outcomes over the first decade of a population-based colorectal cancer screening programme in Ireland.

Methods

A Markov state-transition model of colorectal neoplasia natural history was used. Three core screening scenarios were considered: (a) flexible sigmoidoscopy (FSIG) once at age 60, (b) biennial guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests (gFOBT) at 55–74 years, and (c) biennial faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) at 55–74 years. Three alternative FIT roll-out scenarios were also investigated relating to age-restricted screening (55–64 years) and staggered age-based roll-out across the 55–74 age group. Parameter estimates were derived from literature review, existing screening programmes, and expert opinion. Results were expressed in relation to the 2008 population (4.4 million people, of whom 700,800 were aged 55–74).

Results

FIT-based screening would deliver the greatest health benefits, averting 164 colorectal cancer cases and 272 deaths in year 10 of the programme. Capacity would be required for 11,095-14,820 diagnostic and surveillance colonoscopies annually, compared to 381–1,053 with FSIG-based, and 967–1,300 with gFOBT-based, screening. With FIT, in year 10, these colonoscopies would result in 62 hospital admissions for abdominal bleeding, 27 bowel perforations and one death. Resource requirements for pathology, diagnostic radiology, radiotherapy and colorectal resection were highest for FIT. Estimates depended on screening uptake. Alternative FIT roll-out scenarios had lower resource requirements.

Conclusions

While FIT-based screening would quite quickly generate attractive health outcomes, it has heavy resource requirements. These could impact on the feasibility of a programme based on this screening modality. Staggered age-based roll-out would allow time to increase endoscopy capacity to meet programme requirements. Resource modelling of this type complements conventional cost-effectiveness analyses and can help inform policy making and service planning.

Colorectal cancer screening--optimizing current strategies and new directions

The first evidence that screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) could effectively reduce mortality dates back 20 years. However, actual population screening has, in many countries, halted at the level of individual testing and discussions on differences between screening tests. With a wealth of new evidence from various community-based studies looking at test uptake, screening-programme organization and the importance of quality assurance, population screening for CRC is now moving into a new realm, promising better results in terms of reducing CRC-specific morbidity and mortality. Such a shift in the paradigm requires a change from opportunistic, individual testing towards organized population screening with comprehensive monitoring and full-programme quality assurance. To achieve this, a combination of factors--including test characteristics, uptake, screenee autonomy, costs and capacity--must be considered. Thus, evidence from randomized trials comparing different tests must be supplemented by studies of acceptance and uptake to obtain the full picture of the effectiveness (in terms of morbidity, mortality and cost) the different strategies have. In this Review, we discuss a range of screening modalities and describe the factors to be considered to achieve a truly effective population CRC screening programme.

Impact of the bowel-screening programme on the diagnosis of colorectal cancer in Ayrshire and Arran

AIM

Bowel screening aims to reduce colorectal-cancer mortality by the detection and treatment of early-stage asymptomatic disease and the removal of precancerous adenomas. Bowel screening started in Ayrshire and Arran in September 2007. We report the impact of this screening on the diagnosis and stage of colorectal cancer and characterize screen-detected cancers in comparison with those diagnosed through other pathways.

METHOD

Diagnoses were identified from an audit database. Referrals were grouped into screen detected, routine, urgent and emergency presentations.

RESULTS

Between January 2001 and December 2010, 2289 diagnoses of colorectal cancer were made. From 2001 to 2006, the mean (range) number of new colorectal-cancer diagnoses per year was 210 (198-220). Between 2007 and 2010, the mean (range) number of diagnoses per year was 256 (239-274), a significant (P = 0.008) increase. Since September 2007, 877 colorectal cancers have been diagnosed: 17% were screen detected; 11% were detected as a result of routine GP referral; 51% were detected after urgent GP referral; and 21% were emergency presentations. TNM stage increased with urgency of referral. Approximately two-thirds (66%) of screen-detected colorectal cancers were node negative vs 25% of emergency presentations (P < 0.001). Most screen-detected cancers were distal to the splenic flexure (75%). Screened cancers had favourable pathology; lower T and N stages (both P < 0.001), less venous invasion (P < 0.001) and better differentiation (P < 0.05). Similar results were seen after stratification for TNM stage. Screening has not yet resulted in a significant shift towards early-stage disease since 2007.

CONCLUSION

Screening has been associated with an increase in the numbers of both new and early-stage colorectal cancers. Screen-detected cancers are predominantly early-stage disease with favourable pathology. At present, it remains to be seen whether screening will ultimately translate into an overall reduction in advanced-stage disease.

Immunochemical fecal occult blood testing is equally sensitive for proximal and distal advanced neoplasia

OBJECTIVE

Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is increasingly used for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We aimed to estimate its diagnostic accuracy in invitational population screening measured against colonoscopy.

METHODS

Participants (50-75 years) in an invitational primary colonoscopy screening program were asked to complete one sample FIT before colonoscopy. We estimated FIT sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values in detecting CRC and advanced neoplasia (carcinomas and advanced adenomas) for cutoff levels of 50 (FIT50), 75 (FIT75), and 100 (FIT100) ng hemoglobin (Hb)/ml, corresponding with, respectively, 10, 15 and 20 μg Hb/g feces.

RESULTS

A total of 1,256 participants underwent a FIT and screening colonoscopy. Advanced neoplasia was detected by colonoscopy in 119 (9%), 8 (0.6%) of them had CRC. At FIT50, 121 (10%) had a positive test result; 45 (37%) had advanced neoplasia and 7 (6%) had CRC. A total of 74 of 1,135 FIT50 negatives (7%) had advanced neoplasia including 1 (0.1%) CRC. FIT50 had a sensitivity of 38% (95% confidence interval (CI): 29-47) for advanced neoplasia and 88% (95% CI: 37-99) for CRC at a specificity of 93% (95% CI: 92-95) and 91% (95% CI: 89-92), respectively. The positive and negative predictive values for FIT50 were 6% (95% CI: 3-12) and almost 100% (95% CI: 99-100) for CRC, and 37% (95% CI: 29-46) and 93% (95% CI: 92-95) for advanced neoplasia. The sensitivity and specificity of FIT75 for advanced neoplasia were 33% (95% CI: 25-42) and 96% (95% CI: 94-97). At FIT100, 71 screenees (6%) had a positive test result. The sensitivity and specificity of FIT100 were for advanced neoplasia 31% (95% CI: 23-40) and 97% (95% CI: 96-98), and for CRC 75% (95% CI: 36-96) and 95% (95% CI: 93-96). The area under curve for detecting advanced neoplasia was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.64-0.76). FIT had a similar sensitivity for proximal and distal advanced neoplasia at cutoffs of 50 (38% vs. 37%; P=0.99), 75 (33% vs. 31%; P=0.85) and 100 (33% vs. 29%; P=0.68) ng Hb/ml.

DISCUSSION

Nine out of ten screening participants with CRC and four out of ten with advanced neoplasia will be detected using one single FIT at low cutoff. Sensitivity in detecting proximal and distal advanced neoplasia is comparable.

A future for faecal haemoglobin measurements in the medical laboratory

Guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests (gFOBT) are still used in asymptomatic population bowel screening programmes but are being replaced by faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) for haemoglobin. gFOBT have many well-documented disadvantages and there is little evidence for their use in assessment of the symptomatic. Many laboratories have eliminated gFOBT from their approved repertoires by invoking the authoritative published guidelines. Data continue to accumulate that gFOBT are obsolete. FIT are available in two formats, qualitative and quantitative, the latter having advantages that the faecal haemoglobin concentrations are measured and cut-off concentrations that stimulate further investigation can be user-defined. There is growing evidence that FIT would be useful in a spectrum of clinical settings in addition to screening. All laboratories should have FIT in their existing repertoire. For some uses, qualitative FIT would be adequate. However, much evidence has accumulated that measurements of faecal haemoglobin concentrations are beneficial for the assessment of both disease severity and the future risk of colorectal neoplasia. Interpretation requires appreciation that faecal haemoglobin concentrations are higher in men than women and rise with age. It might well be that risk scoring systems that take gender and age into account, possibly with other factors including symptoms, will benefit individuals. Laboratories should consider how quantitative faecal haemoglobin measurements could be brought into routine practice and included in their forward planning. External quality assessment is needed. Specialists in laboratory medicine are urged to play a significant role in the research and development still required to make this a truly mature investigation.

A retrospective observational study examining the characteristics and outcomes of tumours diagnosed within and without of the English NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme

Background:

Colorectal cancer is common in England and, with long-term survival relatively poor, improving outcomes is a priority. A major initiative to reduce mortality from the disease has been the introduction of the National Health Service (NHS) Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP). Combining data from the BCSP with that in the National Cancer Data Repository (NCDR) allows all tumours diagnosed in England to be categorised according to their involvement with the BCSP. This study sought to quantify the characteristics of the tumours diagnosed within and outside the BCSP and investigate its impact on outcomes.

Methods:

Linkage of the NCDR and BCSP data allowed all tumours diagnosed between July 2006 and December 2008 to be categorised into four groups; screen-detected tumours, screening-interval tumours, tumours diagnosed in non-participating invitees and tumours diagnosed in those never invited to participate. The characteristics, management and outcome of tumours in each category were compared.

Results:

In all, 76 943 individuals were diagnosed with their first primary colorectal cancer during the study period. Of these 2213 (2.9%) were screen-detected, 623 (0.8%) were screening-interval cancers, 1760 (2.3%) were diagnosed in individuals in non-participating invitees and 72 437 (94.1%) were diagnosed in individuals not invited to participate in the programme due to its ongoing roll-out over the time period studied. Screen-detected tumours were identified at earlier Dukes’ stages, were more likely to be managed with curative intent and had significantly better outcomes than tumours in other categories.

Conclusion:

Screen-detected cancers had a significantly better prognosis than other tumours and this would suggest that the BCSP should reduce mortality from colorectal cancer in England.

Comparison of screen-detected and interval colorectal cancers in the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme

Background:

The NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) offers biennial faecal occult blood testing (FOBt) followed by colonoscopy after positive results. Colorectal cancers (CRCs) registered with the Northern Colorectal Cancer Audit Group database were cross-referenced with the BCSP database to analyse their screening history.

Methods:

The CRCs in the screening population between April 2007 and March 2010 were identified and classified into four groups: control (diagnosed before first screening invite), screen-detected, interval (diagnosed between screening rounds after a negative FOBt), and non-uptake (declined screening). Patient demographics, tumour characteristics and survival were compared between groups.

Results:

In all, 511 out of 1336 (38.2%) CRCs were controls; 825 (61.8%) were in individuals invited for screening of which 322 (39.0%) were screen detected, 311 (37.7%) were in the non-uptake group, and 192 (23.3%) were interval cancers. Compared with the control and interval cancer group, the screen-detected group had a higher proportion of men (P=0.002, P=0.003 respectively), left colon tumours (P=0.007, P=0.003), and superior survival (both P<0.001). There was no difference in demographics, tumour location/stage, or survival between control and interval groups.

Conclusion:

The FOBt is better at detecting cancers in the left colon and in men. The significant numbers of interval cancers weren’t found to have an improved outcome compared with the non-screened population.

Detection of methylated SEPT9 in plasma is a reliable screening method for both left- and right-sided colon cancers

BACKGROUND

Methylated Septin 9 (SEPT9) is a sensitive biomarker for colorectal cancer (CRC) from peripheral blood. However, its relationship to cancer localization, guaiac-based fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) have not been described.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Plasma samples were collected for SEPT9 analysis from patients with no evidence of disease (NED) (n=92) before colonoscopy and CRC (n=92) before surgical treatment. DNA was isolated and bisulfite-converted using Epi proColon kit 2.0. Qualitative determination was performed using Epi proColon 2.0 RT-PCR assay. Samples for gFOBT and CEA analysis were collected from NED (n=17 and 27, respectively) and CRC (n=22 and 27, respectively). SEPT9 test was positive in 15.2% (14/92) of NED and 95.6% (88/92) of CRC, including 100% (67/67) from stage II to stage IV CRC and 84% (21/25) of stage I CRC when a sample was called positive if 1 out of 3 PCR replicates was positive. In a second analysis (2 out of 3 PCR replicates) specificity improved to 99% (91/92) of NEDs, at a sensitivity of 79.3% (73/92) of SEPT9 positives in CRC. gFOBT was positive in 29.4% (5/17) of NED and 68.2% (15/22) of CRC and elevated CEA levels were detected in 14.8% (4/27) of NED and 51.8% (14/27) of CRC. Both SEPT9 (84.8%) and CEA (85.2%) showed higher specificity than gFOBT (70.6%). SEPT9 was positive in 96.4% (54/56) of left-sided colon cancer (LSCC) cases and 94.4% (34/36) of right-sided colon cancer (RSCC) cases. gFOBT was positive in 83.3% (10/12) of cases with LSCC and 50% (5/10) of cases with RSCC, elevated CEA was detected 60% (9/15) of LSCC and 41.7% (5/12) of RSCC.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE

The high degree of sensitivity and specificity of SEPT9 in plasma makes it a better method to detect CRC than gFOBT and CEA, even for the more difficult to detect RSCC.