Boston Patient Navigation Research Program: the impact of navigation on time to diagnostic resolution after abnormal cancer screening

Strategies to improve breast cancer care in vulnerable populations

SUMMARY Despite remarkable medical progress in breast cancer detection and treatment, racial and socioeconomic disparities in care continue. To eliminate these inequities in care, a multilevel approach to effectively address individual- and population-based barriers is required. Patient-centered interventions, including patient navigators, have proven valuable by improving diagnostic resolution rates and times. System-level interventions providing organizational changes are effective in increasing follow-up adherence and improving standardization of care. Ultimately, to sustain these efforts requires policy changes with far-reaching potential to increase healthcare coverage and access to these resources. As these changes go into effect, ongoing monitoring of disparity trends and continued redress of remediable causes is critical.

Navigating veterans with an abnormal prostate cancer screening test: a quasi-experimental study

Background

Prostate cancer disproportionately affects low-income and minority men. This study evaluates the impact of a patient navigation intervention on timeliness of diagnostic resolution and treatment initiation among veterans with an abnormal prostate cancer screen.

Methods

Participants were enrolled between 2006 and 2010. The intervention involved a social worker and lay health worker navigation team that assisted patients in overcoming barriers to care. For navigated (n = 245) versus control (n = 245) participants, we evaluated rates of diagnostic resolution and treatment and adjusted for race, age, and Gleason score.

Results

Of 490 participants, 68% were African American, 47% were ≥ 65 years old, and 35% had cancer. Among those with an abnormal screen, navigation did not have a significant effect on time to diagnostic resolution compared to controls (median days of 97 versus 111; adj. HR 1.17, 95% CI, 0.96-1.43, p = 0.12). On analysis of the period beyond 80 days, navigated men reached resolution faster than controls (median of 151 days versus 190 days; adj. HR 1.41, 95% CI, 1.07-1.86, p = 0.01). Among those with cancer, navigation did not have a significant effect on time to treatment initiation compared to controls (median of 93 days versus 87 days; adj. HR 1.15, 95% CI, 0.82-1.62, p = 0.41).

Conclusion

Our navigation program did not significantly impact the overall time to resolution or treatment for men with prostate cancer compared to controls. The utility of navigation programs may extend beyond targeted navigation times, however, and future studies focusing on other outcomes measures are therefore needed.

Patient barriers to follow-up care for breast and cervical cancer abnormalities

BACKGROUND

Women with breast or cervical cancer abnormalities can experience barriers to timely follow-up care, resulting in delays in cancer diagnosis. Patient navigation programs that identify and remove barriers to ensure timely receipt of care are proliferating nationally. The study used a systematic framework to describe barriers, including differences between African American and Latina women; to determine recurrence of barriers; and to examine factors associated with barriers to follow-up care.

METHODS

Data originated from 250 women in the intervention arm of the Chicago Patient Navigation Research Program (PNRP). The women had abnormal cancer screening findings and navigator encounters. Women were recruited from a community health center and a publicly owned medical center. After describing proportions of African American and Latina women experiencing particular barriers, logistic regression was used to explore associations between patient characteristics, such as race/ethnicity, and type of barriers.

RESULTS

The most frequent barriers occurred at the intrapersonal level (e.g., insurance issues and fear), while institutional-level barriers such as system problems with scheduling care were the most commonly recurring over time (29%). The majority of barriers (58%) were reported in the first navigator encounter. Latinas (81%) reported barriers more often than African American women (19%). Differences in race/ethnicity and employment status were associated with types of barriers. Compared to African American women, Latinas were more likely to report an intrapersonal level barrier. Unemployed women were more likely to report an institutional level barrier.

CONCLUSION

In a sample of highly vulnerable women, there is no single characteristic (e.g., uninsured) that predicts what kinds of barriers a woman is likely to have. Nevertheless, navigators appear able to easily resolve intrapersonal-level barriers, but ongoing navigation is needed to address system-level barriers. Patient navigation programs can adopt the PNRP barriers framework to assist their efforts in assuring timely follow-up care.

Reducing inequalities in cancer outcomes: what works?

Despite efforts to reduce disparities in cancer outcomes among vulnerable populations, certain subgroups do not experience the gains made in the reduction of cancer incidence and mortality. In this article, we review recent trial data reporting on patient-, physician-, and system-centered interventions to improve quality and reduce disparities in cancer care spanning patient navigation to health reform. We conclude with data from a state that implemented a multitiered approach, targeting patient and systems barriers, that serves as a guide for future endeavors.