Phase II trial of gefitinib 250 mg daily in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

A review on the treatment of relapsed/metastatic head and neck cancer

The efficacy of traditional chemotherapy in inducing objective responses and prolonging survival in recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer has been disappointing. More recent drugs have not proven superior to the classic regimen of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies, either as single agents or associated to chemotherapy, have been shown to be active and little toxic. Among them, cetuximab has proven to be the most promising. Indeed the Extreme study, which compared the classic couple cisplatin (CDDP) + 5-fluorouracil with the same regimen plus cetuximab, has constituted a remarkable innovation. The results of that trial seem to indicate a third agent added to CDDP and 5-fluorouracil improved both progression-free survival and overall survival in the recurrent or metastatic setting. Unfortunately, the results obtained with the tyrosine kinase inhibitors are less impressive, and additional studies are needed to explore the potentiality of this class of drug. As far as antiangiogenetics are concerned, the research is insufficient for any conclusion to be drawn in terms of efficacy. It is hoped that, in the near future, the most active combination between biological agents and traditional chemotherapy will be found, so that the path successfully taken in other neoplastic diseases may be retraced.

Detection of tumor epidermal growth factor receptor pathway dependence by serum mass spectrometry in cancer patients

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that a serum proteomic profile predictive of survival benefit in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) reflects tumor EGFR dependency regardless of site of origin or class of therapeutic agent.

METHODS

Pretreatment serum or plasma from 230 patients treated with cetuximab, EGFR-TKIs, or chemotherapy for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) or colorectal cancer (CRC) were analyzed by mass spectrometry. Each sample was classified into "good" or "poor" groups using VeriStrat, and survival analyses of each cohort were done based on this classification. For the CRC cohort, this classification was correlated with the tumor EGFR ligand levels and KRAS mutation status.

RESULTS

In the EGFR inhibitor-treated cohorts, the classification predicted survival (HNSCC: gefitinib, P = 0.007 and erlotinib/bevacizumab, P = 0.02; CRC: cetuximab, P = 0.0065) whereas the chemotherapy cohort showed no survival difference. For CRC patients, tumor EGFR ligand RNA levels were significantly associated with the proteomic classification, and combined KRAS and proteomic classification provided improved survival classification.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum proteomic profiling can detect clinically significant tumor dependence on the EGFR pathway in non-small cell lung cancer, HNSCC, and CRC patients treated with either EGFR-TKIs or cetuximab. This classification is correlated with tumor EGFR ligand levels and provides a clinically practical way to identify patients with diverse cancer types most likely to benefit from EGFR inhibitors. Prospective studies are necessary to confirm these findings.

Exons 19 and 21 of epidermal growth factor receptor are highly conserved in squamous cell cancer of the head and neck

Objective. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibition (TKI) is a promising treatment in upper aerodigestive malignancies. EGFR inhibitors might be more effective in patients whose tumors harbor specific EGFR mutations. The presence of specific EFGR mutations is predictive of over a 75% response rate to TKI therapies as compared to 10% in wild type cases of non-small cell lung cancer. Our objective was to examine whether these mutations might occur in upper aerodigestive cancers. Design. DNA was extracted from 20 head and neck squamous cell tumors and 4 squamous cell carcinoma cell lines and sequenced the receptor using published primer pairs. We then compared the results against published mutations. Results. No exon 19 or 21 mutations were found in any of the 20 tumors and 0 of 4 cell lines. Based on the tumor data we would predict that no greater than 8% of head and neck tumors (CI 97.5%) would be likely to harbor either of these mutations. Conclusions. Our findings are comparable to results recently published of Korean, Austrian, and Spanish patient populations and we conclude that exon 19 and 21 EGFR mutations are not more common in head and neck cancer than in nonsmall-cell carcinoma.

Phase II Study of Sunitinib in Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: GORTEC 2006-01

Purpose

To assess the efficacy and toxicity of sunitinib monotherapy in palliative squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

Patients and Methods

Thirty-eight patients with SCCHN having evidence of progressive disease (PD) were treated with sunitinib 37.5 mg/d given continuously until PD or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was the rate of disease control, defined as stable disease (SD) or partial response (PR) at 6 to 8 weeks after treatment initiation (two-stage design, Simon). Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) was performed in a subset of patients before and 6 to 8 weeks after treatment. The volume transfer constant of the contrast agent (Ktrans) was used to measure changes in the microcirculation blood flow and endothelial permeability of the tumor.

Results

A PR was observed in one patient, SD in 18, and PD in 19 (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST]), resulting in a disease control rate of 50%. Among the 18 patients with SD, there were five unconfirmed PRs and six additional minor responses. A significant decrease in Ktranswas seen in three of the four patients who received DCE-MRI monitoring. Grade 5 head and neck bleeds occurred in four patients. Local complications, including the appearance or worsening of tumor skin ulceration or tumor fistula, were recorded in 15 patients.

Conclusion

Sunitinib demonstrated modest activity in palliative SSCHN. The severity of some of the complications highlights the importance of improved patient selection for future studies with sunitinib in head and neck cancer. Sunitinib should not be used outside clinical trials in SSCHN.

Sequence dependence of cell growth inhibition by EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor ZD1839, docetaxel, and cisplatin in head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

This study was to explore whether the efficacy of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor ZD1839 (Z, Iressa, gefitinib) plus chemotherapeutic agents docetaxel (D) and cisplatin (P) may benefit from sequencing of the combination.

METHODS

Three head and neck cancer cell lines were used to study the effect of various combinations of and relative sequencing of D, P, and Z in cell growth inhibition. A population pharmacokinetic stimulation study was conducted on Z in silico and used together with the growth inhibition data to derive principles for future in vivo use of this drug combination.

RESULTS

The inhibitory effects of Z on combinations of D and P were sequence dependent. Treatment simultaneously with DPZ or with DP followed by Z (DP-->Z) showed synergistic effects in all 3 cell lines. However, sequencing with Z followed by DP (Z-->DP), gave an antagonistic effect, suggesting that D and P should be administered when the effect of Z is low. The induction of apoptosis was also sequence dependent. The in silico pharmacokinetic study suggested the feasibility of deriving a 5-day-on/2-day-off regimen for Z, in which D and P administration commences when levels of Z are low, allowing levels of Z to accumulate sufficiently during the remainder of the cycle.

CONCLUSION

These data suggests that it is feasible to design clinical trials with these settings to maximize the efficacy of this combined drug regimen.

Pharmacotherapy of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The clinical management of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a challenging problem and requires a multidisciplinary approach. Historically, locally advanced HNSCC has been primarily managed with surgery and radiation (RT). The integration of pharmacotherapy has rapidly expanded over the years into the multimodality treatment paradigm of locally advanced HNSCC.

OBJECTIVE

The studies leading to the adoption of the current standard of care for locally advanced HNSCC are discussed. In addition, the limitations of these various treatment approaches are presented.

METHODS

An extensive literature search was conducted using the PubMed database for studies published before January 2009. The keywords used for this search were: head and neck neoplasms, chemoradiation, adjuvant chemotherapy, induction chemotherapy, EGFR inhibitor, cisplatin, carboplatin, paclitaxel, docetaxel, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab. Publications of randomized clinical trials and other supporting references leading to the current standard of care were particularly selected and discussed in this review.

CONCLUSIONS

Various single-agent and multi-agent chemotherapeutic regimens have been examined in the context of randomized clinical trials in locally advanced HNSCC for definitive, induction and adjuvant settings. Results from these clinical trials support the use of cisplatin-based chemoradiation as the standard of care for the definitive and adjuvant settings. Recent evidence indicates that cetuximab, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor, is highly active as a single agent and in combination with standard chemotherapy and/or RT. Future studies should focus to determine the optimal pharmacotherapeutic regimens for use in locally advanced HNSCC.

Role of EGF inhibitors in the treatment of recurrent or metastatic squamous cell head and neck cancer

Squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN) is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality worldwide. In recent years, inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor has become an established treatment strategy in SCCHN both in the up-front treatment and in the recurrent and metastatic setting. This review summarizes the most important developments of the recent past and provides an overview of newer developments.

Cross-talk between estrogen receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

This study aimed to characterize estrogen receptor expression and signaling in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cell lines and patient tissues, and to evaluate estrogen receptor and epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor (EGFR) cross-activation in HNSCC.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Estrogen receptor expression and signaling in HNSCC cell lines were assessed by immunoblotting. In vitro proliferation and invasion were evaluated in HNSCC cell lines in response to estrogen receptor and EGFR ligands or inhibitors. Estrogen receptor and EGFR protein expression in patient tissues was assessed by immunohistochemical staining.

RESULTS

Phospho-mitogen-activated protein kinase (P-MAPK) levels were significantly increased following combined estrogen and EGF treatment. Treatment of HNSCC cells with estrogen and EGF significantly increased cell invasion compared with either treatment alone, whereas inhibiting these two pathways resulted in reduced invasion compared with inhibiting either pathway alone. EGFR (P = 0.008) and nuclear estrogen receptor alpha (ER alpha(nuc); P < 0.001) levels were significantly increased in HNSCC tumors (n = 56) compared with adjacent mucosa (n = 30), whereas nuclear estrogen receptor beta (ER beta(nuc)) levels did not differ (P = 0.67). Patients with high ER alpha(nuc) and EGFR tumor levels had significantly reduced progression-free survival compared with patients with low tumor ER alpha(nuc) and EGFR levels (hazards ratio, 4.09; P = 0.01; Cox proportional hazards). In contrast, high ER beta(nuc) tumor levels were not associated with reduced progression-free survival alone or when combined with EGFR.

CONCLUSIONS

ER alpha and ER beta were expressed in HNSCC, and stimulation with estrogen receptor ligands resulted in both cytoplasmic signal transduction and transcriptional activation. Estrogen receptor and EGFR cross-talk was observed. Collectively, these studies indicate that estrogen receptor and EGFR together may contribute to HNSCC development and disease progression.

Targeting EGFR resistance networks in head and neck cancer

A core set of oncoproteins is overexpressed or functionally activated in many types of cancer, and members of this group have attracted significant interest as subjects for development of targeted therapeutics. For some oncoproteins such as EGFR/ErbB1, both small molecule and antibody agents have been developed and applied in the clinic for over a decade. Analysis of clinical outcomes has revealed an initially unexpected complexity in the response of patients to these agents. Diverse factors, including developmental lineage of the tumor progenitor cell, co-mutation or epigenetic modulation of genes encoding proteins in an extended EGFR signaling network or regulating core survival responses in individual tumors, and environmental factors including inflammatory agents and viral infection, all have been identified as modulating response to treatment with EGFR-targeted drugs. Second and third generation therapeutic strategies increasingly incorporate knowledge of cancer type-specific signaling environments, in a more personalized treatment approach. This review takes squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) as a specific example of an EGFR-involved cancer with idiosyncratic biological features that influence design of treatment modalities, with particular emphasis on commonalities and differences with other cancer types.

[Radiotherapy, chemotherapy and target therapy for treatment of head and neck cancer : new developments]

Approximately 60% of patients initially treated for squamous cell cancer of the upper gastrointestinal tract suffer from advanced tumor disease (UICC stages III and IV). Multimodal strategies lead to overall survival rates of up to 50%. Recent studies show indications that the risk of distant metastases after induction chemotherapy (CT) is less than after primary radiotherapy (RT) or radiochemotherapy (RCT). Hyperfractionation or accelerated radiation with concomitant boost shows superior results compared to classic RT. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is a new method for better adjusted dose distribution. Targeted therapy with specific antibodies against biological targets, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), showed superiority over RT but the comparison to classic RCT is still pending. Targeted therapy against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGR) showed antiangiogenetic effects on tumors. In cases of non-resectability or distant metastases, palliative CT and target therapy are recommended. Reirradiation or IMRT offer increased locoregional tumor control at the expense of higher toxicity. Overall, advances in research on tumor biology offer increasingly more prognostic factors and markers for customized individual targeted therapy and CT.

Factors associated with clinical benefit from epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in recurrent and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Single agent epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have demonstrated reproducible response rates of 5-15% in treatment of squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (SCCHN). The subset of patients that benefits most from these agents remains unknown. We reviewed individual patient data from five clinical trials of erlotinib, lapatinib, or gefitinib to determine if there are clinical characteristics that are associated with clinical benefit defined as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and stable disease (SD) >4months. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Three-hundred and nineteen subjects were included. Observed responses were: 1% CR, 6% PR, 24% SD >4months, 18% SD <4months, 45% progressive disease (PD), 7% not evaluable (NE). The median OS was 6.4months and the median PFS was 2.7months. The most common toxicities observed were rash (grade 1 in 37%, grade 2 in 33%, grade 3+ in 6%) and diarrhea (grade 1 in 30%, grade 2 in 10%, grade 3+ in 5%). Performance status (PS) (p=0.04), older age (p=0.02), and development of rash (p<0.01), diarrhea (p=0.03), or oral side effects (p=0.02) were independently associated with clinical benefit. Older age, better PS, and development of rash were associated with longer PFS and OS. Clinical parameters that appear to predict response to EGFR TKI include PS and age. EGFR mechanistic toxicities that develop during therapy are also highly associated with benefit and suggest a relationship between drug exposure and outcome.

Molecular pathology of head and neck cancer: implications for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment

The prototypic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) arises from the mucosal lining of the upper aerodigestive tract, demonstrates squamous differentiation microscopically, involves older men with a long history of cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption, and is treated by multimodality therapy. HNSCC has long been regarded as a uniform disease process requiring a methodical and unwavering therapeutic approach. Divergence in epidemiologic trends among HNSCCs arising from different anatomic sites has introduced a view that, morphologic repetition aside, head and neck cancers form a heterogeneous group. This view has been supported at the molecular genetic level. A more complete understanding of the molecular genetics of head and neck cancer is providing new insights into long-held but poorly comprehended concepts such as field cancerization and is introducing various biomarkers with potential application for diagnosing, staging, monitoring, and prognosticating HNSCC.

Concurrent chemoradiation with carboplatin-5-fluorouracil versus cisplatin in locally advanced oropharyngeal cancers: is more always better?

PURPOSE

The optimal chemotherapy regimen remains undefined in the treatment of locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer by concomitant chemoradiation. This article compares two platinum-based chemotherapy regimens.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In this retrospective study, we reviewed all consecutive patients treated for Stage III or IVA-B oropharyngeal cancer using either a combination of carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) every 3 weeks or high-dose cisplatin every 3 weeks concomitant with definitive radiation therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 200 patients were treated with carboplatin-5FU and 53 patients with cisplatin. Median potential follow-up was 43 months. The 3-year overall survival rates for carboplatin-5FU and cisplatin respectively were 79.1% and 74.9% (p = 0.628), the 3-year disease-free survival rates were 76.0% and 71.3% (p = 0.799), and the 3-year locoregional control rates were 88.4% and 94.2% (p = 0.244).

CONCLUSIONS

We could not demonstrate differences between these two regimens, which both proved efficacious. Polychemotherapy and monochemotherapy therefore seem comparable in this retrospective analysis.

PET monitoring of therapy response in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

In the Western world, more than 90% of head and neck cancers are head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs). The most appropriate treatment approach for HNSCC varies with the disease stage and disease site in the head and neck. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy has become a widely used means for the definitive treatment of locoregionally advanced HNSCC. Although this multimodality treatment provides higher response rates than radiotherapy alone, the detection of residual viable tumor after the end of therapy remains an important issue and is one of the major applications of (18)F-FDG PET. Studies have shown that negative (18)F-FDG PET or PET/CT results after concurrent chemoradiotherapy have a high negative predictive value (>95%), whereas the positive predictive value is only about 50%. However, when applied properly, FDG PET/CT can exclude residual disease in most patients, particularly patients with residual enlarged lymph nodes who would otherwise undergo neck dissection. In contrast to other malignancies, data are limited on the utility of (18)F-FDG PET for monitoring the response to induction chemotherapy in HNSCC or for assessing treatment response early during the course of definitive chemoradiotherapy. The proliferation marker (18)F-3'-deoxy-3'fluorothymidine is currently under study for this purpose. Beyond standard chemotherapy, newer treatment regimens in HNSCC take advantage of our improved understanding of tumor biology. Two molecules important in the progression of HNSCC are the epidermal growth factor receptor and the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor VEGF-R. Drugs attacking these molecules are now under study for HNSCC. PET probes have been developed for imaging the presence of these molecules in HNSCC and their inhibition by specific drug interaction; the relevance of these probes for response assessment in HNSCC will be discussed. Hypoxia is a common phenomenon in HNSCC and renders cancers resistant to chemo- and radiotherapy. Imaging and quantification of hypoxia with PET probes is under study and may become a prerequisite for overcoming chemo- and radioresistance using radiosensitizing drugs or hypoxia-directed irradiation techniques and for monitoring the response to these techniques in selected groups of patients. Although (18)F-FDG PET/CT will remain the major clinical tool for monitoring treatment in HNSCC, other PET probes may have a role in identifying patients who are likely to benefit from treatment strategies that include biologic agents such as epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors or VEGF inhibitors.

Mutation-specific antibodies for the detection of EGFR mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Activating mutations within the tyrosine kinase domain of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are found in approximately 10% to 20% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and are associated with response to EGFR inhibitors. The most common NSCLC-associated EGFR mutations are deletions in exon 19 and L858R mutation in exon 21, together accounting for 90% of EGFR mutations. To develop a simple, sensitive, and reliable clinical assay for the identification of EGFR mutations in NSCLC patients, we generated mutation-specific rabbit monoclonal antibodies against each of these two most common EGFR mutations and aimed to evaluate the detection of EGFR mutations in NSCLC patients by immunohistochemistry.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We tested mutation-specific antibodies by Western blot, immunofluorescence, and immunohistochemistry. In addition, we stained 40 EGFR genotyped NSCLC tumor samples by immunohistochemistry with these antibodies. Finally, with a panel of four antibodies, we screened a large set of NSCLC patient samples with unknown genotype and confirmed the immunohistochemistry results by DNA sequencing.

RESULTS

These two antibodies specifically detect the corresponding mutant form of EGFR by Western blotting, immunofluorescence, and immunohistochemistry. Screening a panel of 340 paraffin-embedded NSCLC tumor samples with these antibodies showed that the sensitivity of the immunohistochemistry assay is 92%, with a specificity of 99% as compared with direct and mass spectrometry-based DNA sequencing.

CONCLUSIONS

This simple assay for detection of EGFR mutations in diagnostic human tissues provides a rapid, sensitive, specific, and cost-effective method to identify lung cancer patients responsive to EGFR-based therapies.

Phase III study of gefitinib compared with intravenous methotrexate for recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck [corrected]

PURPOSE

To compare survival in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) treated with gefitinib 250 or 500 mg/day or standard methotrexate.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four hundred eighty-six patients with recurrent SCCHN were randomly assigned to oral gefitinib 250 mg/day, gefitinib 500 mg/day, or methotrexate 40 mg/m(2) intravenously weekly. Primary end point was overall survival, secondary end points were objective response rate (ORR), safety, symptom improvement, and quality of life (QOL). Exploratory end points included association of efficacy with epidermal growth factor receptor gene copy number and other biomarkers.

RESULTS

Neither gefitinib 250 nor 500 mg/day improved overall survival compared with methotrexate (hazard ratio [HR], 1.22; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.57; P = .12; and HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.43; P = .39, respectively). In the gefitinib 250 mg/day, 500 mg/day, and methotrexate groups, respectively, median overall survival was 5.6, 6.0, and 6.7 months; ORRs (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) were 2.7%, 7.6% and 3.9%, with no statistically significant difference between either gefitinib arm and methotrexate. No unexpected adverse events were observed, except for tumor hemorrhage-type events with gefitinib (8.9%, gefitinib 250 mg/day; 11.4%, gefitinib 500 mg/day; 1.9%, methotrexate). QOL improvement rates (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head & Neck total score) were 13.4%, 18.0%, and 6.0% for gefitinib 250 mg/day, 500 mg/day, and methotrexate, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN, while responses with gefitinib were seen, neither gefitinib 250 nor 500 mg/day improved overall survival compared with methotrexate. With the exception of tumor hemorrhage-type events with gefitinib, the adverse event profiles were generally consistent with those previously observed.

Dose-dependent increases in circulating TGF-alpha and other EGFR ligands act as pharmacodynamic markers for optimal biological dosing of cetuximab and are tumor independent

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to characterize treatment-induced circulating ligand changes during therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors and evaluate their potential as surrogate indicators of the optimal biological dose.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Conditioned medium from human tumor cell lines, ascites fluid from tumor xenografts, and plasma samples from normal mice, as well as colorectal cancer patients, were assessed for ligand elevations using ELISA, following treatment with cetuximab (Erbitux), an anti-mouse EGFR neutralizing antibody, or a small-molecule EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

RESULTS

A rapid elevation in human transforming growth factor alpha (TGF-alpha) was observed in all cell lines after treatment with cetuximab, but not with small-molecule inhibitors. The elevation showed a dose-response effect and plateau that corresponded to the maximal decrease in A431 proliferation in vitro and HT29 tumor growth in vivo. The TGF-alpha increase was exacerbated by ongoing ligand production and cleavage from the plasma membrane but did not involve transcriptional up-regulation of TGF-alpha or the matrix metalloproteinase tumor necrosis factor-alpha-converting enzyme/ADAM17. Elevations in plasma TGF-alpha, amphiregulin, and epiregulin were also detected in normal mice treated with an anti-mouse EGFR monoclonal antibody, illustrating a host tissue-dependent component of this effect in vivo. Finally, circulating TGF-alpha increased in the plasma of six patients with EGFR-negative colorectal tumors during cetuximab treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment-induced increases in circulating ligands, particularly TGF-alpha, should be serially assessed in clinical trials of anti-EGFR therapeutic antibodies as potential biomarkers to aid in determination of the optimal biological dose.

Molecularly targeted agents in the treatment of recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck

Proof of principle that molecularly targeted therapy is a valid therapeutic approach for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) has emerged with epidermal growth factor receptor targeting agents. Other interesting targets, such as Src, insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor, and the proteasome, have been shown in vitro to play key roles in SCCHN, and their inhibition is currently being studied in phase II trials. Identification of predictive biomarkers of resistance or sensitivity to these therapies remains one of the main challenges in the optimal selection of patients most likely to benefit from them. However, clinical trials with these novel agents need to be designed rationally to improve the overall outcome of patients. Given the emerging evidence that human papilloma virus-related SCCHN is a distinct disease, it should be studied in specific trials.

Erlotinib and bevacizumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a phase I/II study

BACKGROUND

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a validated target in squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck, but in patients with recurrent or metastatic disease, EGFR targeting agents have displayed modest efficacy. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-mediated angiogenesis has been implicated as a mechanism of resistance to anti-EGFR therapy. In this multi-institutional phase I/II study we combined an EGFR inhibitor, erlotinib, with an anti-VEGF antibody, bevacizumab.

METHODS

Between April 15, 2003, and Jan 27, 2005, patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck were enrolled from seven centres in the USA and were given erlotinib (150 mg daily) and bevacizumab in escalating dose cohorts. The primary objectives in the phase I and II sections, respectively, were to establish the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity of bevacizumab when administered with erlotinib and to establish the proportion of objective responses and time to disease progression. Pretreatment serum and tissues were collected and analysed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunofluorescence quantitative laser analysis, respectively. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00055913.

FINDINGS

In the phase I section of the trial, ten patients were enrolled in three successive cohorts with no dose-limiting toxic effects noted. 46 patients were enrolled in the phase II section of the trial (including three patients from the phase I section) on the highest dose of bevacizumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks). Two additional patients were accrued beyond the protocol-stipulated 46, leaving a total of 48 patients for the phase II assessment. The most common toxic effects of any grade were rash and diarrhoea (41 and 16 of 48 patients, respectively). Three patients had serious bleeding events of grade 3 or higher. Seven patients had a response, with four showing a complete response allowing rejection of the null hypothesis. Median time of overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) were 7.1 months (95% CI 5.7-9.0) and 4.1 months (2.8-4.4), respectively. Higher ratios of tumour-cell phosphorylated VEGF receptor-2 (pVEGFR2) over total VEGFR2 and endothelial-cell pEGFR over total EGFR in pretreatment biopsies were associated with complete response (0.704 vs 0.386, p=0.036 and 0.949 vs 0.332, p=0.036, respectively) and tumour shrinkage (p=0.007 and p=0.008, respectively) in a subset of 11 patients with available tissue.

INTERPRETATION

The combination of erlotinib and bevacizumab is well tolerated in recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. A few patients seem to derive a sustained benefit and complete responses were associated with expression of putative targets in pretreatment tumour tissue.

Epidermal growth factor receptor kinase domain mutations are rare in salivary gland carcinomas

Activating mutations within the epidermal growth factor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase domain identify non-small cell lung cancer patients with improved clinical response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Recently, we identified two EGFR mutations in a cohort of 25 salivary gland carcinomas (SGCs) by screening the tumour samples for the both most common hotspot mutations in exons 19 and 21 by allele-specific PCR. Here, we present a comprehensive sequencing analysis of the entire critical EGFR tyrosine kinase domain in 65 SGC of the main histopathological types. We found EGFR mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain to be a rare event in SGCs. No additional mutations other than the two known exon 19 deletions (c.2235_2249del15) in a mucoepidermoid carcinoma and an adenoid cystic carcinoma have been detected. Other putative predictive markers for EGFR-targeted therapy in SGCs might be relevant and should be investigated.

EGFR inhibition as a therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Improved understanding of disease biology of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with nearly universal expression of EGFR has led to the introduction of targeted therapies to interrupt signalling of this negative prognostic marker.

OBJECTIVE

We performed a literature review on the mechanisms and efficacy of anti-EGFR antibodies and EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with locally advanced or recurrent/metastatic HNSCC.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

Clinical trials in HNSCC have administered EGFR directed drugs as single agents, in combination with chemotherapy or radiotherapy and demonstrated a good safety profile with antitumour activity in a subgroup of patients. The biology of responsiveness is still unclear, although there is growing evidence of an association of skin toxicity or presence of shorter EGFR intron 1 cytosine-adenine repeats with positive outcome.

Emerging perspectives in epidermal growth factor receptor targeting in head and neck cancer

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been shown to be a promising therapeutic target in head and neck cancer. Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody against EGFR, has been approved in the United States for use with radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. However, the role of EGFR targeting agents in other therapeutic modalities, such as combined chemoradiotherapy or induction chemotherapy, remains to be defined. Although results from several clinical trials have demonstrated the therapeutic potentials of EGFR targeting agents in these settings, further studies are necessary before definitive conclusions can be made. The concurrent targeting of EGFR along with other pathways important in carcinogenesis may hold significant therapeutic potential. In particular, several clinical trials are studying the effects of combining agents that target the vascular endothelial growth factor with EGFR inhibitors. Last, studies are ongoing to elucidate the predictive and correlative biomarkers in anti-EGFR therapy to allow for proper patient selection. In the case of cetuximab, these correlative biomarkers may include elements of the immune system in addition to the signal transduction proteins involved in EGFR pathway.

Targeting important pathways in head and neck cancer: from the bench to the clinic

Radiation therapy as single or combined modality (concurrent chemoradiotherapy) has been the cornerstone of treatment for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck for a long time. Fortunately, advances in tumor biology have provided new insights of tumor proliferation, metastases, migration and cell cycle regulation. The success seen with the use of cetuximab alone or in combination with conventional treatments has led the roadmap to discover other potential target mechanisms which may translate into better response rate with less local and systemic toxicity and improved overall survival. In this review, we discuss other cellular pathways that have shown to be involved in the carcinogenesis of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and the actual efforts to target these mechanisms.

A phase I/II trial of gefitinib and radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced inoperable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Two different doses of gefitinib, administered along with standard radiation therapy, were tested in locally advanced inoperable head and neck cancer with the aim of finding the maximum tolerated dose and assessing the toxicity and activity of the combination. The standard '3+3' design was used for the phase I study. Radiation therapy was given according to conventional dose and schedule. Gefitinib dose escalation was stopped if more than one-third of patients of a given cohort had dose-limiting toxicity. Dose-limiting toxicity was observed in three of four patients treated at the dose of 500 mg, and included grade 3 stomatitis in three patients and grade 3 liver toxicities in one patient. The dose level of 250 mg was recommended for the phase II study. Six confirmed objective responses were observed among 16 patients. Our results do not support further trials with gefitinib and radiation therapy, according to our schedule, in this patient population. Integration of gefitinib within chemoradiotherapy regimens and combination with other biological therapies may represent the next challenge.

Phase II study of gefitinib for the treatment of recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This single-center, phase II study assessed the safety/tolerability and initial efficacy of gefitinib in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) pretreated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients with recurrent and metastatic NPC who had treatment failure with at least 2 lines of chemotherapy including platinum were given gefitinib at a fixed dose of 250 mg daily. Treatment was continued until the patient experienced unacceptable side effects or disease progression.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were enrolled, having had treatment failure with a median of 2 chemotherapy regimens. Treatment was well tolerated, and only grades 1 to 2 adverse events were observed. None of the patients achieved partial or complete response. Median time-to-progression was 4 months, and median overall survival was 16 months.

CONCLUSION

Gefitinib was well tolerated, but the response rate was poor in this heavily pretreated study population, and its use in NPC is not recommended outside the context of clinical trial.

Molecular targets in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Worldwide more than a half million people develop Head and Neck cancer annually. Despite a significant decrease in smoking, about 40,000 new patients are diagnosed with carcinoma of the head and neck annually in the United States, and 11,000 of them succumb to their disease. More than 90% of these cancers are squamous cell carcinoma. The survival rates of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) have not improved significantly despite multimodality therapy including surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. Recently, molecular targeted agents have shown significant improvement in clinical outcomes in chronic myelogeneous leukemia with imatinib, breast cancer with trastuzumab, colon cancer with bevacizumab and cetuximab, and renal cell cancer with sorafenib and sunitinib. In SCCHN the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody cetuximab has shown promising results in a phase III trial in combination with radiation. How best to integrate these agents with the traditional treatment modalities of surgery, radiotherapy, and cytotoxic chemotherapy is of vital importance but has yet to be determined. This article will discuss the biology of molecular targeted agents as well as current clinical trials and future directions of these agents in SCCHN.

Targeting antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family members with cell-permeable BH3 peptides induces apoptosis signaling and death in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells

Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) are frequently characterized by chemotherapy and radiation resistance, and by overexpression of Bcl-XL, an antiapoptotic member of the Bcl-2 protein family. In this report we examined whether cell-permeable peptides derived from the BH3 domains of proapoptotic Bax, Bad, or Bak could be used to target Bcl-XL and/or Bcl-2 in HNSCC cells, and induce apoptotic death in these cells. To render the peptides cell permeable, Antennapedia (Ant) or polyarginine (R8) peptide transduction domains were fused to the amino termini. Fluorescence microscopy of peptide-treated HNSCC cells revealed that the BH3 peptides colocalized with mitochondria, the site of Bcl-XL and Bcl-2 expression. By contrast, a mutant peptide (BaxE BH3) which cannot bind Bcl-XL or Bcl-2 was diffusely localized throughout the cytoplasm. Treatment of three HNSCC cell lines (1483, UM-22A, UM-22B) with the wild-type BH3 peptides resulted in loss of viability and induction of apoptosis, as assessed by MTS assays and annexin V staining. In general, Ant-conjugated peptides were more potent than R8-conjugated peptides, and Bad BH3 peptide was typically more potent than Bax BH3 or Bak BH3. Treatment of purified HNSCC mitochondria with BH3 peptides resulted in robust release of cytochrome c. Thus, the relative apoptosis resistance of HNSCC cells is not due to a deficit in this step of the intrinsic, mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis pathway. We conclude that cell-permeable BH3 peptides can be used to target Bcl-XL and/or Bcl-2 in HNSCC, and targeting of these proteins may have therapeutic value in the treatment of this disease.

Phase I Trial of Gefitinib in Combination With Radiation or Chemoradiation for Patients With Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Head and Neck Cancer

Purpose

To establish the safety and toxicity profile of daily gefitinib with radiation alone or with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in previously untreated patients with locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer (LAHNC).

Patients and Methods

Patients with intermediate-stage LAHNC were treated with concomitant boost radiation (RT) alone with escalating doses of daily gefitinib (250 or 500 mg; cohort I). Once a safety profile was determined with RT alone, patients with high-risk disease were then treated with daily gefitinib (250 or 500 mg), weekly cisplatin (CDDP; 30 mg/m2), and once-daily RT (cohort II). Patients also received post-RT gefitinib at 250 mg daily for a period of up to 2 years.

Results

Twenty-three patients were enrolled and assessable for toxicity. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed in patients treated in cohort I at either 250 or 500 mg of gefitinib daily with concomitant boost RT to 72 Gy. In patients receiving chemoradiotherapy and gefitinib (cohort II), DLTs included one grade 4 diarrhea and one grade 4 neutropenic fever. Fifteen patients started maintenance gefitinib, and eight (53%) experienced grade 1 to 2 acne-like skin rash and diarrhea, but no grade 3 or 4 toxicity occurred.

Conclusion

Gefitinib (250 or 500 mg daily) was well tolerated with concomitant boost RT or concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly CDDP. Protracted administration of gefitinib for up to 2 years at 250 mg daily was also tolerated well.

Phase II trial of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (Zolinza, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck cancer

This phase II trial was initiated to assess the efficacy and safety of oral vorinostat (Zolinza, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck cancer. Eligible patients must have recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck cancer unresponsive to or intolerant of conventional chemotherapy. Patients must have measurable disease, adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function, and be able to swallow capsules. Four or more weeks must have elapsed since prior chemotherapy, radiation therapy, major surgery or investigational anticancer therapy, and patients must have recovered from prior toxicities. Study endpoints included response rate, duration of stable disease and progression-free survival. Thirteen patients were enrolled (9 males); 1 withdrew consent prior to starting therapy. Twelve patients received oral vorinostat 400 mg once daily and were evaluable for response. The median age was 54 years (range 40-82). All patients had received prior chemotherapy (including 10 with platinum- or taxane-based combination therapy), and 9 had prior radiation therapy. No confirmed partial or complete responses were observed. One unconfirmed partial response was seen. Three patients had stable disease ranging from 9 to 26 weeks. Nine patients discontinued due to progressive disease, two withdrew consent, and one discontinued therapy for grade 3 anorexia. Grades 3-4 drug-related toxicities included thrombocytopenia (n=3), anorexia (n=2), and dehydration (n=2). Oral vorinostat 400 mg qd was generally well tolerated but did not demonstrate efficacy as defined by tumor response in this small group of heavily pre-treated patients.

EGFR targeting of solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Recent clinical trials suggest that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted agents could benefit many patients with cancer.

METHODS

We review the current status of several EGFR-targeted therapies in cancer patients and address the efficacy of theses drugs as monotherapy or in combination with other drugs and/or treatments.

RESULTS

Cetuximab is the most widely studied anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody. Other monoclonal antibody agents under investigation are panitumumab, matuzumab, MDX-447, nimutozumab, and mAb806. Extensive research has also evaluated the efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as erlotinib, gefitinib, EKB-569, lapatinib (GW572016), PKI-166, and canertinib (CI-1033). All of these agents have been studied for the treatment of colorectal, lung, breast, pancreatic, renal, head and neck, gynecologic, and prostate cancer. Currently, cetuximab and panitumumab are FDA approved for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Additionally, cetuximab is approved for head and neck cancer. Erlotinib is FDA approved for advanced/metastatic lung cancer. Erlotinib in combination with gemcitabine is approved for advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

EGFR-targeted agents have already shown utility in different scenarios. Researchers are continuously investigating additional cancer types and combined treatment modalities that could also benefit from the use of EGFR-targeted agents. Careful patient selection through the identification of specific biologic markers, such as gene expression, genomic polymorphism, and posttranslational modifications of EGFR downstream effectors, most likely will contribute to the successful use of these agents.

Correlation between development of rash and efficacy in patients treated with the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib in two large phase III studies

PURPOSE

Data from two large phase III studies were analyzed to characterize the correlation between the occurrence of rash during treatment with the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor erlotinib and improved clinical outcomes.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and tumor response were compared between patients in a rash-evaluable subset who did or did not develop rash in National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Studies BR.21 (single agent in non-small-cell lung cancer, n = 444 in erlotinib group and n = 229 in placebo group) and PA.3 (combination with gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer, n = 254 in erlotinib plus gemcitabine group and n = 245 in placebo plus gemcitabine group).

RESULTS

Presence of rash strongly correlated with overall survival in both studies. In Study BR.21, these correlations increased with rash severity grade: grade 1 versus no rash [hazard ratio (HR), 0.41, P < 0.001] and grade >or=2 versus no rash (HR, 0.29, P < 0.001). Similar results were observed for PFS. Disease control (complete response + partial response + stable disease) seemed to increase with the presence and severity of rash. In Study PA.3, grade >or=2 rash (but not grade 1) strongly correlated with overall survival improvement: grade >or=2 versus no rash (HR, 0.47, P < 0.001). Similarly, grade >or=2 rash was strongly correlated with improvements in PFS and disease control.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians and patients should view rash development as a positive event indicative of greater likelihood of clinical benefit. Further studies are required to identify patients most likely to develop rash and to determine if dose escalation to induce rash can improve efficacy.

Metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: an update

BACKGROUND

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the second most common type of skin cancer in the United States. Cutaneous SCC has the potential to metastasize and cause morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to review and summarize the literature on metastatic cutaneous SCC, including risk factors for metastasis, data from clinical studies, and current management.

RESULTS

Multiple studies confirm that even well-differentiated and small tumors (<2 cm) may metastasize. Over the past two decades, additional literature on the risk factors for metastatic cutaneous SCC, including immunosuppression, has been published. In addition, new staging systems have been proposed that may influence management of these tumors. Chemotherapy regimens are numerous, but remain limited in ability to improve overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Although we know more about the risk factors, survival for patients with metastatic cutaneous SCC depends on extent of nodal involvement. Therefore, emphasis should remain on prevention and aggressive treatment of cutaneous SCC and vigilant observation for signs and symptoms of metastasis.

From cell signaling to cancer therapy

Cancer has been seriously threatening the health and life of humans for a long period. Despite the intensive effort put into revealing the underlying mechanisms of cancer, the detailled machinery of carcinogenesis is still far from fully understood. Numerous studies have illustrated that cell signaling is extensively involved in tumor initiation, promotion and progression. Therefore, targeting the key molecules in the oncogenic signaling pathway might be one of the most promising ways to conquer cancer. Some targeted drugs, such as imatinib mesylate (Gleevec), herceptin, gefitinib (Iressa), sorafenib (Nexavar) and sunitinib (Sutent), which evolve from monotarget drug into multitarget ones, have been developed with encouraging effects.

Phase II Trial of Sorafenib in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck or Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Purpose

To determine the efficacy and safety of single-agent sorafenib in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) and nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

Patients and Methods

In this single-arm phase II trial, oral continuous sorafenib was administered in 28-day cycles. Patients had ≤ one line of chemotherapy for recurrent and/or metastatic disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≤ 2, and adequate organ function. At the end of stage 1, efficacy criteria for further accrual were not met, but the study was amended to enroll an additional five patients for paired tumor biopsies.

Results

Twenty-seven and 26 patients were eligible for toxicity and efficacy evaluations, respectively. One patient (3.7%; 95% CI, 0.1% to 19.0%) achieved a partial response. Disease stabilization was maintained in 10 patients (37.0%; 95% CI, 22.4% to 61.2%). The median time to progression was 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.6 to 3.4 months), and median overall survival time was 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.6 to 8.7 months). Sorafenib was well tolerated with few grade 3 and no grade 4 toxicities. Biomarker analysis of paired tumor samples before and after treatment with sorafenib revealed a decrease of pERK in all five patients, with a decrease in Ki67 in four patients, consistent with a disruption of ERK signaling. The antiapoptotic protein Mcl-1 was downregulated in four patients, and there was also evidence of antiangiogenic activity.

Conclusion

Sorafenib was well tolerated and had modest anticancer activity comparable to monotherapy with other targeted agents in this group of patients. Further development in combination with radiation or other agents may be warranted.

Phase I/II Trial of Erlotinib and Cisplatin in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Princess Margaret Hospital Phase II Consortium and National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study

Purpose

To determine the phase II dose and objective response rate of erlotinib, a selective epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in combination with cisplatin in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC).

Patients and Methods

HNSCC patients with no prior chemotherapy and measurable disease were treated in three escalating-dose cohorts of daily continuous oral (PO) erlotinib and intermittent intravenous (IV) cisplatin given every 21 days. The recommended phase II dose (RPTD) was then evaluated in a two-stage trial with a primary end point of objective response rate.

Results

A total of 51 patients were enrolled. The RPTD was identified as erlotinib 100 mg PO daily and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 IV every 21 days. Forty-five patients were treated at the RPTD, of which 44 and 43 were eligible for toxicity and efficacy evaluations, respectively. The intention-to-treat response rate was 21%, with one complete and eight partial responses (95% CI, 10% to 36%), and disease stabilization was achieved in 21 patients (49%; 95% CI, 33% to 65%). Median progression-free survival was 3.3 months (95% CI, 2.7 to 4.8 months) and median overall survival was 7.9 (95% CI, 5.6 to 9.5) months. The combination was well tolerated, with minimal grade 3 or higher toxicity. Subgroup analysis suggested that patients who developed higher grade skin rashes during cycle 1 had better survival outcomes (P = .034).

Conclusion

This schedule of erlotinib and cisplatin has a favorable toxicity profile and has antitumor activity in HNSCC comparable to standard combination chemotherapy regimens.

Clinical trial design limitations in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The present article reviews the randomized trials contributing to the establishment of current standards for the treatment of head and neck cancer. It provides critical analysis of their methodology in order to facilitate future trial design.

RECENT FINDINGS

From a prognosis perspective, head and neck cancers are a heterogeneous group of diseases. Following a number of randomized clinical trials evaluating the role of chemotherapy in the induction, concomitant and adjuvant settings, there has been considerable improvement in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancers during the last decade. It is, however, difficult to interpret and compare the results optimally and to build on efficient trial designs as most of the trials included patients with different levels of essential prognostic factors.

SUMMARY

All key randomized trials will be reviewed according to eligibility criteria, subgroup issues, trial power and historical controls. Methodological interpretation and possible plans for the next generation of clinical trials will be presented.

Malignancies of the head and neck: the role for molecular targeted agents

Although cancers arising in the head and neck region are a diverse group of malignancies, a unifying thread remains a poor overall survival for patients with advanced, recurrent or metastatic disease. Treatment strategies need to evolve and improve upon established therapeutic practices. As the process of cancer evolution is understood to be derived from aberrations in genetic and epigenetic processes, molecularly targeted agents offer attractive therapeutic options by restoring normal control of oncogenic processes. The direct role for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, nasopharynx and salivary gland carcinomas with these novel, molecularly targeted agents are reviewed and their potential to improve on the existing standard of care is further explored.