Gastrinoma (duodenal and pancreatic)

Diagnostic and therapeutic role of endoscopy in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms have substantially increased over the last decades. Because of the indolent clinical course of the disease even in advance stages and the rise in the incidental diagnosis of small asymptomatic lesions, the prevalence of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms is higher than that of pancreatic, gastric and oesophageal adenocarcinomas, making them the second most prevalent cancer type of the gastrointestinal tract. This increase in the overall prevalence of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms has been paralleled by a growth in the importance of the endoscopist in the care of these patients, who usually require a multidisciplinary approach. In this manuscript the diagnostic and therapeutic role of endoscopic for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms will be reviewed.

Zollinger-Ellison syndrome: classical considerations and current controversies

Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) is an endocrinopathy characterized by gastrin-secreting tumors, responsible for causing the formation of multiple, refractory, and recurrent peptic ulcers in the distal duodenum and proximal jejunum. Two main variants have been described, sporadic and those found in association with parathyroid and pituitary tumors, a genetic disorder known as multiple endocrine neoplasia-1 (MEN-1). Biochemical serum evaluation for elevated gastrin, followed by radiological or nuclear localization of the primary lesion, is mandated for establishing diagnosis. The mainstays of treatment include management of hypersecretory state with medical suppression of gastric acid production and surgical resection of primary tumor for the prevention of malignant transformation and metastatic complications. Medical therapy with proton pump inhibitors has virtually eliminated the need for acid-reducing surgical procedures. Surgical approach to sporadic and MEN-1-associated ZES varies based on our understanding of the natural history of the condition and the probability of cure; however, resection to a negative microscopic margin is indicated in both cases. Postoperative surveillance involves measurement of gastrin level, followed by imaging if elevation is detected. Re-excision of recurrent or resection of metastatic disease is a subject of controversy; however, at the present time aggressive cytoreductive approach is favored.

Endoscopic treatment of duodenal neuroendocrine tumors

Duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare neoplasms. In this study, the medical records of 14 patients with duodenal NETs diagnosed at Chonnam National University Hospital from July 2001 to August 2011 were reviewed and analyzed retrospectively. Four patients were diagnosed in the first 5 years, and 10 patients were diagnosed in the latter 5 years of the study. Ten of 12 patients (83.3%) who underwent endoscopic biopsy were confirmed to have NET before resection. Endoscopic resection was performed in 12 patients, surgical resection in one patient, and regular follow-up in one patient who refused resection. None of the patients showed recurrence or distant metastasis. Duodenal NETs are increasingly observed and are mostly detected during screening upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Careful endoscopic examination and biopsy can improve the diagnostic yield of NETs. Most well-differentiated, nonfunctional duodenal NETs that are limited to the mucosa/submucosa can be treated effectively with endoscopic resection.

Zollinger-Ellison syndrome: recent advances and controversies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the recent advances and current controversies in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES).

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent advances in the management of ZES include: improved understanding of the pathogenesis of gastrinoma and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, new prognostic classification systems, new diagnostic algorithms, more sensitive localization studies, new treatment strategies including improved control of gastric acid secretion and role for surgery, and new approaches to patients with advanced disease. Controversies include: the best approach to a patient with hypergastrinemia suspected of possibly having ZES, the appropriate gastrin assay to use, the role of surgery in patients with ZES, especially those with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, and the precise order of therapeutic modalities in the treatment of patients with advanced disease.

SUMMARY

This review updates clinicians regarding important advances and controversies required to optimally diagnose and manage patients with ZES.

Primary lymph node gastrinoma: a rare cause of abdominal pain in childhood

Gastrinoma is a hormone-secreting tumor associated with the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. It is quite rare among children. The discovery of gastrinomas in unusual locations such as lymph nodes, bones, ovaries, and the liver poses a diagnostic dilemma as to whether the tumor is primary or metastatic. Here, we present a case of a primary gastrinoma within a lymph node.

Causes of death and prognostic factors in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: a prospective study: comparison of 106 MEN1/Zollinger-Ellison syndrome patients with 1613 literature MEN1 patients with or without pancreatic endocrine tumors

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is classically characterized by the development of functional or nonfunctional hyperplasia or tumors in endocrine tissues (parathyroid, pancreas, pituitary, adrenal). Because effective treatments have been developed for the hormone excess state, which was a major cause of death in these patients in the past, coupled with the recognition that nonendocrine tumors increasingly develop late in the disease course, the natural history of the disease has changed. An understanding of the current causes of death is important to tailor treatment for these patients and to help identify prognostic factors; however, it is generally lacking.To add to our understanding, we conducted a detailed analysis of the causes of death and prognostic factors from a prospective long-term National Institutes of Health (NIH) study of 106 MEN1 patients with pancreatic endocrine tumors with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (MEN1/ZES patients) and compared our results to those from the pooled literature data of 227 patients with MEN1 with pancreatic endocrine tumors (MEN1/PET patients) reported in case reports or small series, and to 1386 patients reported in large MEN1 literature series. In the NIH series over a mean follow-up of 24.5 years, 24 (23%) patients died (14 MEN1-related and 10 non-MEN1-related deaths). Comparing the causes of death with the results from the 227 patients in the pooled literature series, we found that no patients died of acute complications due to acid hypersecretion, and 8%-14% died of other hormone excess causes, which is similar to the results in 10 large MEN1 literature series published since 1995. In the 2 series (the NIH and pooled literature series), two-thirds of patients died from an MEN1-related cause and one-third from a non-MEN1-related cause, which agrees with the mean values reported in 10 large MEN1 series in the literature, although in the literature the causes of death varied widely. In the NIH and pooled literature series, the main causes of MEN1-related deaths were due to the malignant nature of the PETs, followed by the malignant nature of thymic carcinoid tumors. These results differ from the results of a number of the literature series, especially those reported before the 1990s. The causes of non-MEN1-related death for the 2 series, in decreasing frequency, were cardiovascular disease, other nonendocrine tumors > lung diseases, cerebrovascular diseases. The most frequent non-MEN1-related tumor deaths were colorectal, renal > lung > breast, oropharyngeal. Although both overall and disease-related survival are better than in the past (30-yr survival of NIH series: 82% overall, 88% disease-related), the mean age at death was 55 years, which is younger than expected for the general population.Detailed analysis of causes of death correlated with clinical, laboratory, and tumor characteristics of patients in the 2 series allowed identification of a number of prognostic factors. Poor prognostic factors included higher fasting gastrin levels, presence of other functional hormonal syndromes, need for >3 parathyroidectomies, presence of liver metastases or distant metastases, aggressive PET growth, large PETs, or the development of new lesions.The results of this study have helped define the causes of death of MEN1 patients at present, and have enabled us to identify a number of prognostic factors that should be helpful in tailoring treatment for these patients for both short- and long-term management, as well as in directing research efforts to better define the natural history of the disease and the most important factors determining long-term survival at present.

Pharmacotherapy of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome

INTRODUCTION

The role of pharmacotherapy in the management of patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) is often equated with the medical management of acid hypersecretion. However, pharmacotherapy is also increasingly involved in the other management areas of these patients.

AREAS COVERED

This paper reviews the role of pharmacotherapy in all aspects of the management of patients with ZES. Newer aspects are emphasized. This includes the difficulty of diagnosing ZES in patients taking proton pump inhibitors. Also covered is the role of pharmacotherapy in controlling acid hypersecretion and other hormonal hypersecretory states these patients may develop, including hyperparathyroidism in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and ZES; tumor localization; and the treatment of advanced metastatic disease. The last includes chemotherapy, liver-directed therapies, biotherapy (somatostatin/interferon), peptide radio-receptor therapy and molecular-targeted therapies including the use of mTor inhibitors (everolimus) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (sunitinib).

EXPERT OPINION

Pharmacotherapy is now involved in all aspects of the management of patients with ZES, with the result that ZES has progressed from being considered an entirely surgical disease initially to the present where medical treatment plays a major role in almost all aspects of the management of these patients.

Current management of the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome

In summary, ZES is a syndrome caused by gastrinoma, usually located within the gastrinoma triangle and associated with symptoms of peptic ulcer disease, GERD, and diarrhea. The diagnosis of ZES is made by measuring fasting levels of serum gastrin, BAO, and the secretin stimulation test. Because of the high association of ZES and MEN1, HPT must be excluded by obtaining a serum calcium and parathyroid hormone level. Treatment of ZES consists of medical control of symptoms with PPIs and evaluation for potentially curative surgical intervention. Noninvasive imaging studies including SRS, CT, and MRI should be performed initially to evaluate for metastases and identify resectable disease. Invasive imaging modalities such as EUS may be performed to further evaluate primary tumors. IOUS, palpation, and duodenotomy are used for intraoperative localization of gastrinomas. In patients with MEN1, surgical resection should be pursued only if there is an identifiable tumor larger than 2 cm and after surgery for the primary hyperparathyroidism (3 1/2-gland parathyroidectomy). All patients with resectable localized sporadic gastrinoma should undergo surgical exploration, even those with biochemical evidence but negative imaging studies. Tumor is most commonly found in the duodenum, and the cure rate is high. In patients with liver metastases, surgery should be considered if all identifiable tumor can be safely removed. A multidisciplinary approach including surgical and nonsurgical therapies should be taken in patients with advanced disease.

Selective Arterial Embolization of Liver Metastases from Gastrinomas: A Single-Centre Experience

Background. Gastrinomas are rare functional neuroendocrine tumors causing the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES). At presentation, up to 25% of gastrinomas are metastasized, predominantly to the liver. Embolization of liver metastases might reduce symptoms of ZES although a postembolization syndrome can occur. In this study, the results of embolization are presented, and the literature results are described. Methods. From a prospective database of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, all patients with liver metastatic gastrinomas were selected if treated with arterial embolization. Primary outcome parameters were symptom reduction, complications, and response rate. The literature search was performed with these items. Results. Three patients were identified; two presented with synchronous liver metastases. All the three patients had symptoms of ZES before embolization. Postembolization syndrome occurred in two patients. Six months after embolization, all the 3 patients had a clinical and complete radiological response; a biochemical response was seen in 2/3 patients. From the literature, only a small number of gastrinoma patients treated with liver embolization for liver metastases were found, and similar results were described. Conclusion. Selective liver embolization is an effective and safe therapy for the treatment of liver metastatic gastrinomas in the reduction of ZES. Individual treatment strategies must be made for the optimal success rate.

Surgery for GEP-NETs

Surgery is the only treatment that may cure the patient with gastroentero-pancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumours (NET) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) and should always be considered as first line treatment if R0/R1 resection can be achieved. The surgical and interventional procedures for GEP-NET are accordingly described below. Life-long follow-up should be performed in almost all patients at a specialized NET center.

Surgical treatment of gastrinomas: a single-centre experience

BACKGROUND

Gastrinomas are rare neuroendocrine tumours, and responsible for Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES). Surgery is the only treatment that can cure gastrinomas. The success of surgical treatment of gastrinomas in a single centre was evaluated.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent resection for a gastrinoma between 1992 and 2011 at a single institution was performed. Presentation, diagnostics, operative management and outcome were analysed.

RESULTS

Eleven patients with a median age of 46 years were included. All patients had fasting hypergastrinaemia and a primary tumour was localized using imaging studies in all patients. A pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed in three patients: two patients underwent duodenectomy and one patient central pancreatectomy. The remaining five patients underwent enucleation. A primary tumour was removed in nine patients: five tumours were situated in the pancreas, three in the duodenum and one patient was considered to have a primary lymph node gastrinoma. The median follow-up was 3 years (range 1-15) after which 7 patients were disease-free and 3 patients had (suspected) metastatic disease. One patient died 13 years after initial surgery.

CONCLUSION

The success of surgical treatment of a gastrinoma in this series was 7/11 with a median follow-up of 3 years; comparable to recent published studies.

Pathology - grading and staging of GEP-NETs

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs) constitute a heterogeneous group of neoplasms. In the last few decades, due to a substantial rise in incidence and prevalence, GEP-NETs have been included among the most common tumours of the gastrointestinal tract. Diagnosis could be challenging and a significant number of patients present with metastatic or unresectable disease. The development of appropriate tools for standardised prognostic stratification and the introduction of effective target therapies have opened new horizons for planning tailored surgical or medical management and follow-up programs for these complex neoplasms. An overview on the GEP-NETs' diagnostic and prognostic criteria proposed by the recently published WHO classification and ENETS and UICC TNM staging systems is presented, focussing on their impact on the clinical and therapeutical approaches.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: clinical features, diagnosis and medical treatment: advances

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) comprise with gastrointestinal carcinoids, the main groups of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (GI-NETs). Although these two groups of GI-NETs share many features including histological aspects; over-/ectopic expression of somatostatin receptors; the ability to ectopically secrete hormones/peptides/amines which can result in distinct functional syndromes; similar approaches used for tumor localization and some aspects of treatment, it is now generally agreed they should be considered separate. They differ in their pathogenesis, hormonal syndromes produced, many aspects of biological behaviour and most important, in their response to certain anti-tumour treatment (chemotherapy, molecular targeted therapies). In this chapter the clinical features of the different types of pNETs will be considered as well as aspects of their diagnosis and medical treatment of the hormone-excess state. Emphasis will be on controversial areas or recent advances. The other aspects of the management of these tumors (surgery, treatment of advanced disease, tumor localization) are not dealt with here, because they are covered in other chapters in this volume.

Diagnosis of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome: increasingly difficult

In the present paper the increasing difficulty of diagnosis of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) due to issues raised in two recent papers is discussed. These issues involve the difficulty and need to withdraw patients suspected of ZES from treatment with Proton Pump Inhibitors (omeprazole, esomeprazole, lansoprazole, rabeprazole, pantoprazole) and the unreliability of many gastrin radioimmunoassays. The clinical context of each of these important issues is reviewed and the conclusions in these articles commented from the perspective of clinical management.

Impact of lymphadenectomy on survival after surgery for sporadic gastrinoma

BACKGROUND

The study was undertaken to determine prognostic factors and the value of systematic lymphadenectomy on survival in sporadic gastrinoma.

METHODS

Patients with sporadic gastrinoma who underwent initial surgery during a 21-year period in two tertiary referral centres were analysed retrospectively with respect to clinical characteristics, operative procedures and outcome.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients with a median age of 52 (range 22-73) years were analysed. Some 18 patients had pancreatic and 26 had duodenal gastrinomas, whereas the primary tumour remained unidentified in four patients. After a median postoperative follow-up of 83 (range 3-296) months, 20 patients had no evidence of disease, 13 patients were alive with disease, 11 patients had died from the disease and four had died from unrelated causes. In 41 patients who underwent potentially curative surgery, systematic lymphadenectomy with excision of more than ten lymph nodes resulted in a higher rate of biochemical cure after surgery than no or selective lymphadenectomy (13 of 13 versus 18 of 28 patients; P = 0·017), with a trend towards prolonged disease specific survival (P = 0·062) and disease-free survival (P = 0·120), and a reduced risk of death (0 of 13 versus 7 of 24 patients; P = 0·037). Negative prognostic factors for disease specific survival were pancreatic location (P = 0·029), tumour size equal to or larger than 25 mm (P = 0·003), Ki-67 index more than 5 per cent (P < 0·001), preoperative gastrin level 3000 pg/ml or more (P = 0·003) and liver metastases (P < 0·001). Sex, age, type of surgery and presence of lymph node metastases had no influence on disease free or disease specific survival.

CONCLUSION

In sporadic gastrinoma, systematic lymphadenectomy during initial surgery may reduce the risk of persistent disease and improve survival.

Lymph nodes and survival in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

HYPOTHESIS

Lymph node metastases decrease survival in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs).

DESIGN

Prospective database searches.

SETTING

National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Stanford University Hospital (SUH).

PATIENTS

A total of 326 patients underwent surgical exploration for pNETs at the NIH (n = 216) and SUH (n = 110).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Overall survival, disease-related survival, and time to development of liver metastases.

RESULTS

Forty patients (12.3%) underwent enucleation and 305 (93.6%) underwent resection. Of the patients who underwent resection, 117 (35.9%) had partial pancreatectomy and 30 (9.2%) had a Whipple procedure. Forty-one patients also had liver resections, 21 had wedge resections, and 20 had lobectomies. Mean follow-up was 8.1 years (range, 0.3-28.6 years). The 10-year overall survival for patients with no metastases or lymph node metastases only was similar at 80%. As expected, patients with liver metastases had a significantly decreased 10-year survival of 30% (P < .001). The time to development of liver metastases was significantly reduced for patients with lymph node metastases alone compared with those with none (P < .001). For the NIH cohort with longer follow-up, disease-related survival was significantly different for those patients with no metastases, lymph node metastases alone, and liver metastases (P < .001). Extent of lymph node involvement in this subgroup showed that disease-related survival decreased as a function of the number of lymph nodes involved (P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

As expected, liver metastases decrease survival of patients with pNETs. Patients with lymph node metastases alone have a shorter time to the development of liver metastases that is dependent on the number of lymph nodes involved. With sufficient long-term follow-up, lymph node metastases decrease disease-related survival. Careful evaluation of number and extent of lymph node involvement is warranted in all surgical procedures for pNETs.

Therapy of metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs): recent insights and advances

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) [carcinoids, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs)] are becoming an increasing clinical problem because not only are they increasing in frequency, but they can frequently present with advanced disease that requires diagnostic and treatment approaches different from those used in the neoplasms that most physicians are used to seeing and treating. In the past few years there have been numerous advances in all aspects of NETs including: an understanding of their unique pathogenesis; specific classification systems developed which have prognostic value; novel methods of tumor localization developed; and novel treatment approaches described. In patients with advanced metastatic disease these include the use of newer chemotherapeutic approaches, an increased understanding of the role of surgery and cytoreductive methods, the development of methods for targeted delivery of cytotoxic agents, and the development of targeted medical therapies (everolimus, sunitinib) based on an increased understanding of the disease biology. Although pNETs and gastrointestinal NETs share many features, recent studies show they differ in pathogenesis and in many aspects of diagnosis and treatment, including their responsiveness to different therapies. Because of limited space, this review will be limited to the advances made in the management and treatment of patients with advanced metastatic pNETs over the past 5 years.

Rate of clinically significant postoperative pancreatic fistula in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

In 2005, the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) developed a definition and grading system for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). The authors sought to determine the rate of POPF after enucleation and/or resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) and to identify clinical, surgical, or pathologic factors associated with POPF.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of pancreatic enucleations and resections performed from March 1998 to April 2010. We defined a clinically significant POPF as a grade B that required nonoperative intervention and grade C.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-two patients were identified; 62 patients had enucleations and 60 patients had resections of PNET. The rate of clinically significant POPF was 23.7 % (29/122). For pancreatic enucleation, the POPF rate was 27.4 % (17/62, 14 grade B, 3 grade C). The pancreatic resection group had a POPF rate of 20 % (12/60, 10 grade B, 2 grade C). This difference was not significant (p = 0.4). In univariate analyses, patients in the enucleation group with hereditary syndromes (p = 0.02) and non-insulinoma tumors (p = 0.02) had a higher POPF rate. Patients in the resection group with body mass index (BMI) > 25 (p < 0.01), multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1; p < 0.01) and those who underwent simultaneous multiple procedures (p = 0.02) had a higher POPF rate. Multivariate analyses revealed that hereditary syndromes were able to predict POPF in the enucleation group, while having BMI > 25 and increasing lesion size were also associated with POPF in the group undergoing resection.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a clinically significant POPF rate after surgery in PNET to be 23.7 % with no difference by the type of operation. Our POPF rate is comparable to that reported in the literature for pancreatic resection for other types of tumors. Certain inherited genetic diseases-von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL) and MEN-1-were associated with higher POPF rates.

Recurrence after surgical resection of gastrinoma: who, when, where and why?

BACKGROUND

Surgery prolongs survival in patients with gastrinomas, but postoperative recurrences are frequent and controversies still exist about the optimal surgical procedures.

AIM

The aim of this study is to analyze biological and morphological recurrences and to search for risk factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1990 and 2008, 22 patients (five with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1) who underwent curative resection for gastrinoma were evaluated every 6 months for biological and morphological recurrences. All patients were disease-free postresection.

RESULTS

The median postoperative follow-up was 37 months (range, 7-204 months). A biological recurrence was observed in 59% of cases, after a median time of 16.5 months (range, 7-90 months). A morphological recurrence was reported in 32% of cases, in the liver (86%) or lymph nodes (43%), after a median time of 21 months (range, 8-91 months). The median delay between biological and morphological recurrence was 3 months (range, 0-69 months). At recurrence, all patients were offered a second treatment (surgical resection in 71% of cases). One and 5 year overall survival were 100 and 76%, respectively. One and 5 year biological disease-free survival (DFS) were 76 and 27%, respectively. One and 5 year morphological DFS were 90 and 62%, respectively. Tumor size of at least 20 mm (P=0.008) and pancreatic location (P=0.04) of the primary tumor had significant effect on morphological DFS. Overall survival was significantly lower in patients with primary tumor of at least 20 mm (P=0.01).

CONCLUSION

(a) Recurrence occurs in nearly two out of three patients operated upon for gastrinoma, most often detected through biological tests; (b) lymph nodes and liver are the most frequent sites of relapse and patients benefit from second treatment; (c) risk factors for recurrences are as follows: size of at least 20 mm; and the pancreatic location of the primary tumor.

Medical treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Treatment of the clinically and prognostically heterogeneous neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) should be based on a multidisciplinary approach, including surgical, interventional, medical and nuclear medicine-based therapeutic options. Medical therapies include somatostatin analogues, interferon-α, mTOR inhibitors, multikinase inhibitors and systemic chemotherapy. For the selection of the appropriate medical treatment the hormonal activity, primary tumor localization, tumor grading and growth behaviour as well as the extent of the disease must be considered. Somatostatin analogues are mainly indicated in hormonally active tumors for symptomatic relief, but antiproliferative effects have also been demonstrated, especially in well-differentiated intestinal NET. The efficacy of everolimus and sunitinib in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) has been demonstrated in large placebo-controlled clinical trials. pNETs are also chemosensitive. Streptozocin-based chemotherapeutic regimens are regarded as current standard of care. Temozolomide in combination with capecitabine is an alternative that has shown promising results that need to be confirmed in larger trials. Currently, no comparative studies and no molecular markers are established that predict the response to medical treatment. Therefore the choice of treatment for each pNET patient is based on individual parameters taking into account the patient’s preference, expected side effects and established response criteria such as proliferation rate and tumor load. Platin-based chemotherapy is still the standard treatment for poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. Clearly, there is an unmet need for new systemic treatment options in patients with extrapancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Multiple giant duodenal ulcers associated with duodenal gastrinoma

A 59-year-old Japanese man with a history of chronic hepatitis C and cirrhosis was admitted to hospital because of severe abdominal pain and diarrhea. His discomfort had begun 2 months earlier and was localized to the upper abdomen. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showed multiple ulcerative lesions from the duodenal bulb to the descending part of the duodenum, one of which was a giant ulcer that filled half of the intestinal lumen. Despite continuous intravenous lansoprazole therapy, his abdominal symptoms did not improve. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was again performed to detect the tumor, but it was difficult to observe the tumor with a conventional endoscope. We then inverted a transnasal endoscope into the duodenum, and this enabled us to detect a 15-mm submucosal tumor in the upper wall of the duodenal bulb. Examination of specimens from endoscopic ultrasonography fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the tumor revealed gastrinoma in the duodenal bulb. We decided to perform an operative resection. The patient's symptoms resolved after surgery, and he remained asymptomatic at follow-up 18 months later. Therefore, when it is difficult to detect the tumor directly by conventional endoscopy, we recommend that attempts be made to detect the tumor by inverting a transnasal endoscope into the duodenal bulb.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrinomas in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 (MEN-1)

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) is a rare autosomal-dominant disease. It is associated with a broad range of endocrine tumours, most frequently arising in the parathyroid glands, the pituitary and the pancreas. Most neuroendocrine tumours will be diagnosed in the pancreas as non-functioning neuroendocrine tumours or insulinomas. Forty-two percent of the patients will develop a gastrin-secreting neuroendocrine tumour, a gastrinoma. Gastrinomas in MEN-1 tend to be small, multiple and preferentially located in the duodenum. This paper will focus on the specific characteristics of gastrinomas in the setting of MEN-1 compared to sporadic gastrinomas. The developments in understanding the tumorigenesis of these tumours and the consequences for diagnosis and therapy will be discussed.

[Neuroendocrine tumors of the duodenum and pancreas. Surgical strategy]

The incidence of neuroendocrine tumors (NET) has increased worldwide by 3-5 times over the last decades. This is mainly based on the broad use of imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic approaches. As a consequence many duodenal and pancreatic tumors are detected in an early stage resulting in an improved prognosis of these patients. Besides the measurement of serum chromogranin A and 5-hydroxy indolic acid measured in 24 h urine collection, CT, endosonographic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopy are important diagnostic tools. About 20% of all patients with pancreatic and duodenal NETs are diagnosed because of specific symptoms. More than 95% of diagnosed NETs are sporadic tumors. Whenever possible these patients should be treated by resection. Benign neuroendocrine duodenal tumors up to 1 cm in size can be removed endoscopically. The endoscopic resection of larger tumors should be performed surgically. The therapy of hereditary NETs of the duodenum and the pancreas should be decided after interdisciplinary discussion. However, even these patients seem to benefit from resection. In case of metastatic disease debulking surgery should be considered if more than 90% of the tumor mass can be resected. In patients with extensive liver metastases but resectable primary NET, liver transplantation is a reasonable option. There is no consensus about adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment of duodenal or pancreatic NETs. The therapy with everolimus or sunitinib in advanced tumor stages has shown promising results. The administration of somatostatin analogues or antacids is appropriate for symptom reduction.

Surgical treatment of multiple spine metastases from gastrinoma

STUDY DESIGN

 Case report.

CLINICAL QUESTION

 To report successful surgical therapy for spinal cord compression in a patient with spinal metastases from a pancreatic gastrinoma.

METHODS

 A 43-year-old man presented three times within 4 years with cervical and upper thoracic spinal cord compression because of metastatic gastrinoma. He had two previous spine metastases to the lower thoracic and lumbar spine, a T11 compressive lesion which required a T9L1 fusion, and an L4 lesion that was treated with chemotherapy and stereotactic radiation. The compression was relieved each time by surgery.

RESULTS

 The patient underwent three surgeries in 4 years: (1) debulking and removal of the rib head on the left at T3, and debulking of the tumor at T3 with hemilaminectomy and spinal cord decompression with internal fixation from T1-T5 using posterolateral instrumented fusion and allograft; (2) anterior C7 corpectomy with placement of a cage from C7-T1 with both anterior and posterior fusion of C2C7; and (3) T1-T3 laminectomy, T1-T3 exploration of wound, revision of hardware, T1-T3 removal of spinal tumor, and T3 bilateral transpedicular circumferential decompression. The patient is alive and regained the ability to walk 8 years after initial diagnosis, despite the appearance of spinal metastases 1 year after the diagnosis of liver metastases.

CONCLUSION

 Surgery for spinal cord compression in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors can be effective in relieving radicular pain, weakness and numbness, and while not curative can greatly improve quality of life.

Classification and pathology of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are composed of cells with a neuroendocrine phenotype. The old and the new WHO classifications distinguish between well-differentiated and poorly differentiated neoplasms. All well-differentiated neoplasms, regardless of whether they behave benignly or develop metastases, will be called neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), and graded G1 (Ki67 <2%) or G2 (Ki67 2-20%). All poorly differentiated neoplasms will be termed neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) and graded G3 (Ki67 >20%). To stratify the GEP-NETs and GEP-NECs regarding their prognosis, they are now further classified according to TNM-stage systems that were recently proposed by the European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society (ENETS) and the AJCC/UICC. In the light of these criteria the pathology and biology of the various NETs and NECs of the gastrointestinal tract (including the oesophagus) and the pancreas are reviewed.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gut and pancreas: new insights

Neuroendocrine neoplasms arise in almost every organ of the body and are variably defined according to the site of origin. This Review focuses on neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive tract and pancreas. The 2010 WHO classification of tumors of the digestive system introduces grading and staging tools for neuroendocrine neoplasms. A carcinoid is now defined as a grade 1 or 2 neuroendocrine tumor and grade 3, small-cell or large-cell carcinomas are defined as neuroendocrine carcinoma. Epidemiological data show a worldwide increase in the prevalence and incidence of gastroentero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in the past few decades, which is probably due to improved methods of detection of these tumors. The current diagnostic procedures and treatment options for neuroendocrine neoplasms are defined and summarized in the Review, although evidence-based data are lacking. Surgery remains the treatment mainstay and somatostatin analogues the basis for both diagnosis and therapy as the only 'theranostic' tool. Emerging compounds including chemotherapeutic agents, small molecules and biological therapies may provide new hope for patients.

[Metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Non-surgical treatment strategies]

The clinical presentation of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) varies depending on the site of origin, functional activity, histological differentiation and tumor growth behavior. Therapeutic strategies aim to improve the symptoms of clinical syndromes related to the secretion of amines and peptides, inhibit tumor growth and prevent complications. Novel molecular targeted drug therapies offer new treatment options in addition to established therapies, such as somatostatin analogs and chemotherapy. The precise positioning of these drugs and of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy still needs to be defined. In general, the different medical treatments are used in a sequential way and are in part combined with surgical and loco-regional/ablative procedures in a highly individualized approach. In certain clinical conditions, however, established treatment strategies are followed. This review presents the management of patients with small intestinal and pancreatic NEN with respect to the functionality and tumor grading. The use of novel targeted drug therapy is included in a therapeutic algorithm.

Tailored imaging of islet cell tumors of the pancreas amidst increasing options

Pancreatic islet cell tumors are neuroendocrine tumors, which can produce hormones and can arise as part of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 or von-Hippel-Lindau-disease, two genetically well-defined hereditary cancer syndromes. Currently, technical innovation improves conventional and specific molecular imaging techniques. To organize the heterogeneous results described for the imaging of these tumors, we distinguished three indications (1) imaging of a patient with hormone hypersecretion, (2) search for a pancreatic primary in case of proven neuroendocrine cancer of unknown primary, and (3) screening of asymptomatic mutation carriers. We searched for publications on imaging of islet cell tumors between 1995 and January 2010 and defined a Level of Evidence (LOE) for the applicability of each technique. For each technique, data were analyzed in a Forest plot and arranged per imaging indication and tumor subtype. LOEs are weak for all imaging techniques. Analyses indicate a prominent role for endoscopic ultrasound for all three indications.

Pancreatic endocrine tumors with major vascular abutment, involvement, or encasement and indication for resection

BACKGROUND

Surgery for pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs) with blood vessel involvement is controversial.

HYPOTHESIS

Resection of PETs with major blood vessel involvement can be beneficial.

DESIGN

The combined databases of the National Institutes of Health and Stanford University hospitals were queried.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Operation, pathologic condition, complications, and disease-free and overall survival.

RESULTS

Of 273 patients with PETs, 46 (17%) had preoperative computed tomography evidence of major vascular involvement. The mean size for the primary PET was 5.0 cm. The involved major vessel was as follows: portal vein (n = 20), superior mesenteric vein or superior mesenteric artery (n = 16), inferior vena cava (n = 4), splenic vein (n = 4), and heart (n = 2). Forty-two of 46 patients had a PET removed: 12 (27%) primary only, 30 (68%) with lymph nodes, and 18 (41%) with liver metastases. PETs were removed by either enucleation (n = 7) or resection (n = 35). Resections included distal or subtotal pancreatectomy in 23, Whipple in 10, and total in 2. Eighteen patients had concomitant liver resection: 10 wedge resection and 8 anatomic resections. Nine patients had vascular reconstruction: each had reconstruction of the superior mesenteric vein and portal vein, and 1 had concomitant reconstruction of the superior mesenteric artery. There were no deaths, but 12 patients had complications. Eighteen patients (41%) were immediately disease free, and 5 recurred with follow-up, leaving 13 (30%) disease-free long term. The 10-year overall survival was 60%. Functional tumors were associated with a better overall survival (P < .001), and liver metastases decreased overall survival (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that surgical resection of PETs with vascular abutment/invasion and nodal or distant metastases is indicated.

The archaic distinction between functioning and nonfunctioning neuroendocrine neoplasms is no longer clinically relevant

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are increasing in incidence and prevalence. This reflects greater clinical awareness, effective imaging, and increasing pathological diagnostic recognition. Although the identification and treatment of clinical neuroendocrine syndromes are established, there is confusion when a NEN has no discernible clinical symptoms.

DISCUSSION

Nonfunctional tumors are usually diagnosed incidentally and at a later stage largely because either they do not secrete a bioactive product or do so, but in a form that is either inactive or in quantities that have no discernible effect. Nevertheless, the histopathology is indistinguishable from functional NENs, and tumors exhibit somatostatin receptor expression, and positive immunohistochemistry for neuroendocrine cell markers (CgA, NSE/synaptophysin). Similarly, their rates of growth and metastatic behavior are, like other NENs, predictably based on staging and grading (mitotic rate and Ki67 expression). Both types are diagnosed biochemically (CgA) and by imaging in an identical fashion with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, and endoscopic ultrasound. NENs, irrespective of function or bioactive secretory profile, respond with equal efficacy to the same regimen of surgery or antitumor drugs (e.g., somatostatin analogs with or without tyrosine kinase inhibitors/antiangiogenics or cytotoxics) depending on grade. Given the efficacy of somatostatin analogs in increasing progression free survival, nonfunctional NENs should be managed identically to symptomatic NENs. The consideration of NENs as functional or nonfunctional is an archaic clinical concept that should be discarded since the tumors are indistinguishable at a cellular, biological, and morphological level. All current evidences indicate that their diagnosis and treatment should follow the same common principles.

New and emerging syndromes due to neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare, slow-growing neoplasms characterized by their ability to store and secrete different peptides and neuroamines. Some of these substances cause specific clinical syndromes whereas others are not associated with specific syndromes or symptom complexes. NETs usually have episodic expression that makes diagnosis difficult, erroneous, and often late. For these reasons a high index of suspicion is needed, and it is important to understand the pathophysiology of each tumor to decide which biochemical markers are more useful and when they should be used.

Surgical treatment of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors

INTRODUCTION

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are uncommon but clinically challenging and fascinating tumors. GEP-NETs present as either functional or as nonfunctional tumors. Functional tumors are commonly associated with a specific hormonal syndrome directly related to a hormone secreted by the tumor, like gastrinomas with a Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or carcinoid syndrome in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET) of the ileum. Nonfunctional tumors do not secrete a hormone resulting in a clinical syndrome.

METHODS

The natural course of GEP-NETs is highly variable. Small, benign neoplasms such as 90% of all insulinomas or gastric endocrine tumors type 1 are readily curable by surgical resection; however, most other GEP-NETs have a much less favorable prognosis. Patients with completely resected tumors generally have a good prognosis, and an aggressive surgical approach in patients with advanced disease may also prolong survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This review focuses on the current standards of surgical treatment of gastric endocrine tumors, NETs of the pancreas (PNET) and NETs of the ileum. Although the evidence level is low in many instances due to the lack of randomized controlled trials, important treatment recommendations can be given.

[About a case of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Review of some clinical manifestations and treatment controversies]

The rare hereditary syndrome, multiple endocrine neoplasia type1 (MEN-1), is known to predispose affected individuals to endocrine neoplasms in a variety of tissues such as the parathyroid glands, the pituitary gland and the gastrointestinal tract. We describe the case of a man with traditionally-described manifestations (hyperparathyroidism and gastrinoma) and with other tumoral lesions arising from endocrine cells (insulinoma, gastric carcinoid, adrenal adenoma and pancreatic non-functioning neuroendocrine tumors) and non-endocrine cells (lipoma and collagenoma). Frequent recurrences in susceptible tissues that are not totally removed (as occurs in hyperparathyroidism and duodenal gastrinoma) and their unknown clinical significance have aroused current controversies in the therapeutic management of these entities, which is briefly reviewed.

Pancreatic endocrine tumors

Pancreatic endocrine tumors have been steadily growing in incidence and prevalence during the last two decades, showing an incidence of 4-5/1,000,000 population. They represent a heterogeneous group with very varying tumor biology and prognosis. About half of the patients present clinical symptoms and syndromes related to substances released from the tumors (Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, insulinoma, glucagonoma, etc) and the other half are so-called nonfunctioning tumors mainly presenting with symptoms such as obstruction, jaundice, bleeding, and abdominal mass. Ten percent to 15% of the pancreatic endocrine tumors are part of an inherited syndrome such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1), von Hippel-Lindau (VHL), neurofibromatosis, or tuberousclerosis. The diagnosis is based on histopathology demonstrating neuroendocrine features such as positive staining for chromogranin A and specific hormones such as gastrin, proinsulin, and glucagon. Moreover, the biochemical diagnosis includes measurement of chromogranins A and B or specific hormones such as gastrin, insulin, glucagon, and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) in the circulation. In addition to standard localization procedures, radiology (computed tomography [CT] scan, magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], ultrasound [US]), somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, and most recently positron emission tomography with specific isotopes such as (11)C-5 hydroxytryptamin ((11)C-5-HTP), fluorodopa and (68)Ga-1,4,7,10-tetra-azacyclododecane-N,N',N″,N‴-tetra-acetic acid (DOTA)-octreotate are performed. Surgery is still one of the cornerstones in the management of pancreatic endocrine tumors, but curative surgery is rarely obtained in most cases because of metastatic disease. Debulking and other cytoreductive procedures might facilitate systemic treatment. Cytotoxic drugs, biological agents, such as somatostatin analogs, alpha interferons, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors are routinely used. Tumor-targeted radioactive treatment is available in many centres in Europe and is effective in patients with tumors that express high content of somatostatin receptors type 2 and 5. In the future, treatment will be based on tumor biology and molecular genetics with the aim of so-called personalized medicine.

Mechanism of acid hypersecretion post curative gastrinoma resection

BACKGROUND

Some patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome post curative gastrinoma resection continue to show gastric acid hypersecretion; however, the mechanism is unknown.

AIM

The aim of this study was to prospectively study acid secretion following curative gastrinoma resection and analyze factors contributing in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.

METHODS

Fifty patients cured post gastrinoma resection were studied with serial assessments of acid secretory status, cure status and ECL-cell status/activity (with serial biopsies, CgA, urinary N-MIAA). Correlative analysis was performed to determine predictive factors.

RESULTS

Hypersecretion occurred in 31 patients (62%) and 14 had extreme-hypersecretion. There was an initial decline (3-6 months) in BAO/MAO, which then remained stable for eight years. Preoperative BAO correlated with the postoperative secretion, but not other clinical, tumoral, laboratory variables, the degree of postoperative acid suppression or type of antisecretory drug needed. Hypersecretors had greater postoperative ECL changes (P=0.005), serum CGA (P=0.009) and 24-h urinary N-MIAA (P=0.0038).

CONCLUSIONS

Post curative resection, gastric hypersecretion persists long term (mean 8 years) in 62% of patients and in 28% it is extreme, despite normogastrinemia. No preoperative variable except BAO correlates with postresection hypersecretion. The persistent increased ECL-cell extent post curative resection suggests prolonged hypergastrinemia can lead to changes in ECL-cells that are either irreversible in humans or sustained by unknown mechanisms not involving fasting hypergastrinemia and which can result in hypersecretion, in a proportion of which it can be extreme. Whether similar findings may occur in patients with idiopathic GERD treated for prolonged periods (>10 years) with PPIs, at present, is unknown.

Endocrine tumours of the pancreas

Verbeke C S (2010) Histopathology 56, 669-682 Endocrine tumours of the pancreas Histopathology reporting of pancreatic endocrine neoplasms is complex. The tumours can exhibit a variety of morphological appearances, which often require careful differential diagnostic consideration. Prediction of tumour behaviour and clinical outcome is based on the World Health Organization classification and TNM staging and grading system, which share some criteria and premises, but differ significantly in others. Clinicopathological correlation through discussion at multidisciplinary team meetings is of paramount importance. In this review special emphasis is given to the items of information that can and should be provided by the pathologist to allow optimal patient management. The review further discusses areas of current controversy and uncertainty, of which pathologists participating in multidisciplinary discussions should be aware.

Neuroendocrine tumors of the small bowels are on the rise: Early aspects and management

Neuroendocrine tumors of the small bowel are on the rise. In the US they have increased by 300%-500% in the last 35 years. At the same time their prognosis is much improved. Today, most neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the duodenum are detected "incidentally" and therefore recognized at an early stage. Duodenal NETs which are well differentiated, not larger than 10 mm and limited to the mucosa/submucosa can be endoscopically resected. The management of duodenal NETs ranging between 10 and 20 mm needs an interdisciplinary discussion. Endoscopic ultrasound is the method of choice to determine tumor size and depth of infiltration. Surgery is recommended for well-differentiated duodenal NET tumors greater than 20 mm, for localized sporadic gastrinomas (of any size) and for localized poorly differentiated NE cancers. Surgery is recommended for any ileal NET. Advanced ileal NETs with a carcinoid syndrome are treated with long-acting somatostatin analogs. This treatment significantly improves (progression-free) survival in patients with metastatic NETs of the ileum. For optimal NET management, tumor biology, type, localization and stage of the neoplasm, as well as the patient's individual circumstances have to be taken into account.

NANETS treatment guidelines: well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the stomach and pancreas

Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the stomach and pancreas represent 2 major subtypes of gastrointestinal NETs. Historically, there has been little consensus on the classification and management of patients with these tumor subtypes. We provide an overview of well-differentiated NETs of the stomach and pancreas and describe consensus guidelines for the treatment of patients with these malignancies.

Pancreatic endocrine tumors: improved TNM staging and histopathological grading permit a clinically efficient prognostic stratification of patients

Pancreatic endocrine tumors are rare diseases and devising a clinically effective prognostic stratification of patients is a major clinical challenge. This study aimed at assessing whether the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM)-based staging and proliferative activity-based grading recently proposed by the European NeuroEndocrine Tumors Society (ENETS) have clinical value. TNM was applied to 274 patients with histologically diagnosed pancreatic endocrine tumors operated from 1991 to 2005, with last follow-up at December 2007. According to World Health Organization (WHO) classification, 246 were well-differentiated neoplasms (51 benign, 56 uncertain behavior, 139 carcinomas) and 28 poorly differentiated carcinomas. Grading was based on Ki67 immunohistochemistry. Survival analysis not only ascertained the prognostic value of the TNM system but also highlighted that in the absence of nodal and distant metastasis, infiltration and tumor dimensions over 4 cm had prognostic significance. T parameters were then appropriately modified to reflect this weakness. The 5-year survival for modified TNM stages I, II, III and IV were 100, 93, 65 and 35%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified TNM stages as independent predictors of death, in which stages II, III and IV showed a risk of death of 7, 29 and 58 times higher than stage I tumors (P<0.0001). Ki67-based grading resulted an independent predictor of survival with cut-offs at 5 and 20%. In conclusion, WHO classification assigns clinically significant diagnostic categories to pancreatic endocrine tumors that need prognostic stratification by applying a staging system. The ENETS-TNM provides the best option, but it requires some modifications to be fully functional. The modified TNM described in this study ameliorates the clinical applicability and prediction of outcome of the ENETS-TNM; it (i) assigns a risk of death proportional to the stage at the time of diagnosis, and (ii) allows a clinically based staging of patients, as the T parameters as modified permit their clinical-radiological recognition. Ki67-based grading discerns prognosis of patients with same stage diseases.