Effect of completeness of revascularization on long-term outcome of patients with three-vessel disease undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. A report from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry

Ten-year outcome analysis of off-pump sequential grafting: single surgeon, single center experience

OBJECTIVES

Despite increasing recognition that off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery and sequential grafting strategy individually are associated with improved outcomes, concerns persist regarding the safety and efficacy of combining these 2 techniques. We compared in-hospital and midterm outcomes for off-pump multivessel sequential and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting.

METHODS

From September 1998 to September 2008, 689 consecutive patients received off-pump multivessel sequential coronary artery bypass grafting performed by a single surgeon. These patients were propensity matched to 689 patients who underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting without sequential anastomoses. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected perioperative data was performed. In addition, medical notes and charts of all the study patients were reviewed. The mean duration of follow-up was 5.1 ± 2.0 years.

RESULTS

The major in-hospital clinical outcomes in the sequential and control groups were found to be similar. After adjusting for clinical covariates, sequential grafting was not an independent predictor of in-hospital adverse events (odds ratio [OR], 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86-1.50; P = .31), medium-term mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.26; 95% CI, 1.06-1.32; P = .92), and readmission to hospital (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.96-1.20; P = .80). Sequential grafting was an independent predictor of receiving more than 3 distal anastomoses (OR, 7.46; 95% CI, 4.27-11.45; P < .0001). Risk-adjusted survival was 89% for sequential grafting patients and 88% for conventional grafting patients (P = .96) during the medium-term follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis confirms the short- and midterm safety and efficacy of off-pump sequential coronary artery bypass grafting.

Multislice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease

Multislice CT angiography represents one of the most exciting technological revolutions in cardiac imaging and it has been increasingly used in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Rapid improvements in multislice CT scanners over the last decade have allowed this technique to become a potentially effective alternative to invasive coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. High diagnostic value has been achieved with multislice CT angiography with use of 64- and more slice CT scanners. In addition, multislice CT angiography shows accurate detection and analysis of coronary calcium, characterization of coronary plaques, as well as prediction of the disease progression and major cardiac events. Thus, patients can benefit from multislice CT angiography that provides a rapid and accurate diagnosis while avoiding unnecessary invasive coronary angiography procedures. The aim of this article is present an overview of the clinical applications of multislice CT angiography in coronary artery disease with a focus on the diagnostic accuracy of coronary artery disease; prognostic value of coronary artery disease with regard to the prediction of major cardiac events; detection and quantification of coronary calcium and characterization of coronary plaques. Limitations of multislice CT angiography in coronary artery disease are also briefly discussed, and future directions are highlighted.

Impact of the Presence and Extent of Incomplete Angiographic Revascularization After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndromes

Background—

The clinical significance of incomplete coronary revascularization (ICR) after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes is unknown.

Methods and Results—

We performed quantitative angiography of the entire coronary tree in 2954 patients with acute coronary syndromes in the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) trial. ICR was variably defined if any lesion with diameter stenosis (DS) cutoffs ranging from ≥30% to ≥70% with reference vessel diameter ≥2.0 mm remained after percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary outcome was 1-year composite rate of major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven unplanned revascularization). With the use of DS cutoffs ≥30%, ≥40%, ≥50%, ≥60%, and ≥70%, the prevalence of ICR after percutaneous coronary intervention was 75%, 55%, 37%, 25%, and 17%, respectively. The 1-year major adverse cardiac event rate was increased among patients with ICR using all of the DS cutoffs. ICR (≥50% DS) was associated with higher 1-year rates of myocardial infarction (12.0% versus 8.2%; hazard ratio, 1.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.18–1.89; P =0.0007) and ischemia-driven unplanned revascularization (15.7% versus 10.2%; hazard ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.28–1.96; P <0.0001), with a trend toward increased mortality (3.1% versus 2.2%; hazard ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.90–2.27; P =0.13). By multivariable analysis, ICR (≥50% DS) was an independent predictor of 1-year major adverse cardiac events (hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.12–1.64; P =0.002). The impact of ICR on major adverse cardiac events was similar regardless of chronic total occlusion presence, but it was more pronounced with a greater number of nonrevascularized lesions.

Conclusions—

Depending on the threshold of percent DS, ICR was present in 17% to 75% of patients with acute coronary syndromes after percutaneous coronary intervention. Regardless of the threshold, ICR was strongly associated with 1-year myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven unplanned revascularization, and major adverse cardiac events.

Clinical Trial Registration—

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00093158.

Complete revascularization is compromised in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

OBJECTIVE

Patients who undergo off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) commonly receive fewer bypass grafts and are more often incompletely revascularized compared with those receiving conventional coronary artery bypass (CCAB) recipients. Because this can compromise survival, we sought to determine whether patients undergoing OPCAB are incompletely revascularized and whether this affects long-term survival and freedom from cardiac events.

METHODS

OPCAB cases (n = 411) performed from January 1, 1997 to June 30, 2003 were considered for inclusion and matching with 874 randomly selected, contemporary CCAB cases. After propensity matching, 308 OPCAB cases and 308 CCAB cases were included in the final analysis. We compared the number of bypass grafts and the completeness of revascularization by coronary territory. Survival and readmission for cardiac causes were monitored for up to 10 years postoperatively, with a median follow-up period of 5.9 years.

RESULTS

On average, the patients undergoing OPCAB received significantly fewer distal anastomoses than did those undergoing CCAB (mean ± standard deviation, 2.6 ± 0.9 vs 3.0 ± 1.0, P < .0001). The circumflex territory was the most likely territory to be ungrafted during OPCAB in patients with angiographically significant obstruction (P = .0006). The frequency of complete revascularization was significantly different between the 2 groups (OPCAB, 79.2% vs CCAB, 88.3%; P = .0.002). The OPCAB group had a significantly greater rate of total arterial grafting (OPCAB, 66.6% vs CCAB, 49.7%; P = .0001). No difference was seen in 8-year survival or freedom from cardiac cause hospital readmission between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite receiving fewer distal anastomoses and the decreased frequency of complete revascularization, OPCAB and CCAB techniques produced comparable results.

Completeness of revascularization and survival among octogenarians with triple-vessel disease

BACKGROUND

We sought to determine the impact of the completeness of surgical revascularization among octogenarians with triple-vessel disease.

METHODS

Between 1992 and 2008, 476 consecutive patients aged 80 years or more who underwent primary isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedures were identified. Early and late survival were compared among patients who underwent complete revascularization (CR, n=391) and incomplete revascularization (IR, n=85). IR was present when 1 or more of the 3 main coronary arteries with 50% or greater stenosis that were identified preoperatively as a surgical target by the operating surgeon were not grafted. The mean follow-up was 5.4±3.0 years (maximum 15.3 years).

RESULTS

Baseline risk was similar between the 2 groups of patients. IR was more frequent in off-pump compared with on-pump CABG (34.9% versus 16.2%, respectively; p=0.002). The most common reason for IR was small or severely diseased arteries (87%). The incidence of postoperative myocardial infarction (MI) was similar in both groups (CR, 18.4% versus IR, 17.3%; p=0.81). In-hospital mortality was 7.2% among patients with CR and 4.7% among patients with IR (p=0.60). Three, 5-, and 8-year freedom from all-cause mortality among patients who underwent CR were 89.2%, 74.1%, and 54.3%, respectively, and were not significantly different from those patients who underwent IR (86.6%, 74.5%, and 49.4%, respectively) (p=0.40).

CONCLUSIONS

In octogenarians with triple-vessel disease, a strategy of incomplete revascularization during CABG does not negatively impact early or long-term survival.

Incidence, predictors and outcomes of incomplete revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting: a subgroup analysis of 3-year SYNTAX data

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether incomplete revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has an effect on long-term outcomes.

METHODS

During a heart team discussion to evaluate whether patients were eligible for randomization in the SYNTAX trial, both the cardiologist and surgeon agreed on which vessels needed revascularization. This statement was compared with the actual revascularization after treatment. Incomplete revascularization was defined as when a preoperatively identified vessel with a lesion was not revascularized. Outcomes were major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE), the composite safety endpoint of death/stroke/myocardial infarction (MI), and individual MACCE components death, MI and repeat revascularization at 3 years. Predictors of incomplete revascularization were explored.

RESULTS

Incomplete revascularization was found in 43.3% (388/896) PCI and 36.8% (320/870) CABG patients. Patients with complete revascularization by PCI had lower rates of MACCE (66.5 versus 76.2%, P < 0.001), the composite safety endpoint (83.4 versus 87.9%, P = 0.05) and repeat revascularization (75.5 versus 83.9%, P < 0.001), but not death and MI. In the CABG group, no difference in outcomes was seen between incomplete and complete revascularization groups. Incomplete revascularization was identified as independent predictor of MACCE in PCI (HR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.15-2.08, P = 0.004) but not CABG patients. Independent predictors of incomplete revascularization by PCI were hyperlipidaemia (OR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.04-2.42, P = 0.031), a total occlusion (OR = 2.46, 95% CI 1.66-3.64, P < 0.001) and the number of vessels (OR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.41-1.77, P < 0.001). Independent predictors of incomplete revascularization by CABG were unstable angina (OR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.02-1.98, P = 0.038), diffuse disease or narrowed ( < 2 mm) segment distal to the lesion (OR = 1.87, 95% CI 1.31-2.69, P = 0.001) and the number of vessels (OR = 1.70, 95% CI 1.53-1.89, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the hypothesis-generating nature of this data, this study demonstrates that incomplete revascularization is associated with adverse events during follow-up after PCI but not CABG.

Safe introduction and quality control of new methods in coronary surgery

Introduction:

The first part of the paper analyses off pump coronary bypass surgery (OPCAB), which is compared with traditional on-pump procedures (ONCAB). Furthermore ,the paper evaluates the use of a new automatic device for performance of the proximal anastomosis and finally the effect of intracoronary shunt on myocardial ischemia during OPCAB. The main goal of the paper is to demonstrate the importance of careful clinical studies during introduction of the new techniques in cardiac surgery.

Methods:

Statistical analysis was performed on a large clinical database from Buffalo, NY, USA comparing OPCAB and ONCAB. Subsequently, a sequential controlled clinical study compared patients operated with a new automatic connector device to patients operated with classic suture technique. Finally a randomized study was performed to evaluate the effect of the use of an intracoronary shunt during construction of distal anastomosis.

Results:

The studies from Buffalo demonstrated reduced complications rates in high risk patients when OPCAB techniques were used. The use of connector devices in saphenous venous anastomosis was clearly inferior to standard technique. Intracoronary shunt was found to be beneficial by preventing ischemia.

Discussion:

Numerous studies have studied the results of OPCAB vs ONCAB and although results are variable it seems that OPCAB is advantageous in high risk patients, while in low risk patients there are much less if any benefit. The results of the studies of connector devices caused the product to be taken off the market. The value of shunt in OPCAB was clearly demonstrated by the randomized studies.

Conclusion:

The investigations presented in this paper clearly demonstrates the importance of well-designed studies when new surgical methods are introduced. In the present period of rapid technological development, carefully controlled, un-biased clinical trials are crucial to preserve patient safety and avoid unjustified societal cost.

Impact of incomplete surgical revascularization on survival

Complete revascularization is considered superior to incomplete revascularization (IR), with better long-term survival and a lower rate of reintervention. However, it has yet to be established whether this difference is due directly to IR as a surgical strategy or whether this approach is merely a marker of more severe coronary disease and more rapid progression. We believe that IR is a prognostic marker for a more complex coronary pathology, and adverse effects are probably due to the preoperative condition of the patient. In fact, although IR may negatively affect long-term outcomes, it may be, when wisely chosen, the ideal treatment strategy in selected high-risk patients. IR can derive from a surgical strategy of target vessel revascularization, where the impact of surgery is minimized to reduce perioperative mortality and morbidity, aiming to achieve the best feasible safe revascularization.

The impact of coronary artery endarterectomy on outcomes during coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND

The impact of coronary artery endarterectomy during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been debated. We examined the early and late outcomes of CABG with endarterectomy (CE) compared to CABG alone.

METHODS

Patients undergoing isolated CABG operations from 2003 to 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. We identified 99 patients who underwent CE and 3:1 propensity matched them to 297 CABG-alone patients based upon clinical factors: Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) predicted risk of mortality, age, gender, year of surgery, and ejection fraction. Patient risk factors as well as short- and long-term outcomes were compared by univariate and Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Preoperative risk factors were similar between patients undergoing CE or CABG alone. Cross-clamp times (95.6 vs. 71.8 minutes, p = 0.0001) and perfusion times (121.8 vs. 92.7 minutes, p = 0.0001) were longer in patients undergoing CE. Operative mortality (4.0% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.112) and postoperative complications were not significantly different between groups. Patients undergoing coronary endarterectomy incurred longer ICU (75.06 vs. 48.64 hours, p = 0.001) and hospital stays (9.01 vs. 7.7 days, p = 0.034). Long-term mortality (mean follow-up = 27.7 ± 17.7 months) was equivalent despite revascularization technique (p = 0.13); however, patients undergoing CE encountered worse overall freedom from myocardial infarction (MI) (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing CABG with coronary CE required longer ventilatory support and ICU stay yet have comparable operative mortality, major complication rates, and long-term survival to isolated CABG. Coronary endarterectomy should be considered an acceptable adjunct to CABG for patients with extensive coronary artery disease to achieve complete revascularization. 

Impact of completeness of revascularization on the five-year outcome in percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft patients (from the ARTS-II study)

The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcome at 5 years in patients with complete and incomplete revascularization treated with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents. Baseline and procedural angiograms and surgical case-record forms were centrally assessed for completeness of revascularization. Patients treated with PCI for incomplete revascularization were stratified according to Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score tertiles. Complete revascularization was achieved in 360 of 588 patients (61.2%) in the PCI with sirolimus-eluting stent group and 477 of 567 patients (84.1%) in the CABG group (p <0.05). There was no significant difference in 5-year survival without major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs; death, cerebrovascular accident, myocardial infarction, and any revascularization) between patients with complete and incomplete revascularization treated with PCI or CABG. Survival free from MACCEs in patients with incomplete revascularization treated with PCI was significantly lower than those with complete revascularization treated with CABG (hazard ratio 1.66, 0.96 to 1.80, log-rank p = 0.001). The 5-year MACCE-free survival in patients with incomplete revascularization treated with PCI stratified according to SYNTAX score tertiles showed a significantly lower MACCE survival in the higher SYNTAX tertile compared to the low (hazard ratio 0.56, 0.32 to 0.96, log-rank p = 0.04) and intermediate (hazard ratio 0.50, 0.28 to 0.91, log-rank p = 0.02) tertiles, whereas survival between the low and intermediate SYNTAX tertiles was not significantly different (hazard ratio 1.13, 0.60 to 2.13, log-rank p = 0.71). In conclusion, this study suggests that patients with complex coronary disease, in whom complete revascularization cannot be achieved with PCI, should be offered surgical revascularization. However, in those patients with less complex disease, PCI is a valid alternative even if complete revascularization cannot be achieved.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass may increase late mortality: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Although a lot of randomized trials of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus on-pump CABG were conducted, the majority of them reported only early outcomes. Previous meta-analyses of a few randomized trials found no differences for 1-year to 2-year mortality.

METHODS

We focused late (> or = 1 year) all-cause mortality and performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of off-pump versus on-pump CABG. The MEDLINE, the EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched using PubMed and OVID. For each study, data regarding all-cause mortality in both the off-pump and on-pump groups were used to generate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals. Study-specific estimates were combined using inverse variance-weighted averages of logarithmic RRs in both fixed-effects and random-effects models.

RESULTS

Our search identified 11 results of 12 randomized trials (4,326 patients) of off-pump versus on-pump CABG. Pooled analysis demonstrated a statistically significant increase in midterm all-cause mortality by a factor of 1.37 with off-pump relative to on-pump CABG (RR, 1.373; 95% confidence interval, 1.043 to 1.808). Exclusion of any single result, except for the largest (>2,000 patients) trial, from the analysis did not substantively alter the overall result of our analysis. Eliminating the largest trial demonstrated a statistically nonsignificant benefit of on-pump over off-pump CABG for midterm all-cause mortality (RR, 1.344; 95% confidence interval, 0.952 to 1.896).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our analysis suggest that off-pump CABG may increase late all-cause mortality by a factor of 1.37 over on-pump CABG. Longer term mortality from randomized trials of off-pump versus on-pump CABG is needed.

Smoking and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: part III: functional biomarkers influenced by smoking

Smoking cigarettes induces rapidly occurring and reversible functional changes in the cardiovascular system, which precede morphologic changes. These functional changes are also related to atherosclerotic disease development and thus may qualify as prognostic parameters in chronic smokers. As opposed to smoking-induced morphologic changes functional alterations occur and revert within minutes, thus, allowing for the detection of smoking-induced effects on the cardiovascular system within minutes following exposure to mainstream smoke. Some alterations represent 'direct' changes (e.g., endothelial function), others reflect changes in a different organ system (e.g., the autonomous nervous system influencing heart rate variability), while some represent the sum of alterations in many organs and systems (e.g., exercise performance influenced by the autonomous nervous and by endothelial and cardiac function). Since a specific functional parameter usually changes with at least one or several others, caution should be exercised when trying to establish a direct cause relationship between the alteration of a single parameter and a clinical outcome.

Off-pump coronary artery surgery with the Coronéo Cor-Vasc stabilizing device: clinical experience of 141 patients

OBJECTIVES

Numerous devices have been successfully introduced in off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (OPCABG) surgery, most of them being disposable tools based on suction stabilization. Coronéo Cor-Vasc is a reusable system combining suction positioning with compression stabilization. The purpose of this study was to analyze our experience in OPCABG with the Cor-Vasc system.

METHODS

Between March 2001 and May 2008, 141 patients (age = 71.1 +/- 7.5 years) underwent OPCABG surgery using the Cor-Vasc system, representing 6.3% of the case volume of isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery in the same period. Eighty-eight patients (62.4%) underwent surgery on an urgent basis. In 95 patients (67.4%), the OPCABG option was selected after finding a diseased ascending aorta at intraoperative epiaortic ultrasound.

RESULTS

Among 334 anastomoses (mean = 2.4 +/- 1 per patient), 242 (95 patients) were fashioned with bilateral and 54 (46 patients) with single internal thoracic artery, respectively. In 89.4 and 73% of patients, a complete and a total arterial myocardial revascularization was achieved, respectively. There were two strokes (1.4%) and two myocardial infarctions (1.4%). Two patients died in the hospital (1.4%). Median ICU and in-hospital length of stay were 31.2 h and 10 days, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, the use of the Cor-Vasc system, including the device-learning curve, was associated with low mortality and morbidity indexes in an aged population with a high risk of stroke. The system appeared to be sufficiently versatile and potentially cost-effective when compared with disposable devices.

Evaluation of revascularization subtypes in octogenarians undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND

Recent data suggest that octogenarians' long-term survival after complete coronary artery bypass graft revascularization is superior to incomplete revascularization. Discriminating between variable definitions of "complete" complicates interpretation of survival data. We aimed to clarify octogenarian long-term survival rates by stratifying revascularization subtypes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From 1986 to 2007, 580 patients 80 to 94 years of age underwent coronary artery bypass graft. Functional complete revascularization was defined as at least 1 graft to all diseased coronary vessels with >50% stenosis. Traditional complete revascularization was defined as 1 graft to each major arterial system with at least 50% stenosis. Incomplete revascularization was defined as leaving diseased, ungrafted regions. Revascularization was functional in 279 (48%), traditional in 181 (31%), and incomplete in 120 (21%). Long-term survival was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Of 537 operative survivors, there were 402 late deaths. Cumulative long-term survival totaled 2890 patient-years. Late survival (Kaplan-Meier) was similar between functional (mean, 6.8 years) and traditional (6.7 years) groups (P=0.51), but diminished with incomplete (4.2 years) revascularization (P=0.007). Survival by group at 5 years was: 59+/-3% functional, 57+/-4% traditional, and 45+/-5% incomplete. Survival at 8 years was: 40+/-3% functional, 37+/-4% traditional, and 26+/-5% incomplete. To minimize selection bias in patients with limited life expectancy, Kaplan-Meier analysis was repeated including only patients with survival >12 months. Survival was again impaired with incomplete revascularization (P=0.04), and there was no difference between functional and traditional complete revascularization (P=0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Bypassing all diseased arterial vessels after revascularization does not afford significant long-term survival advantage compared to a traditional approach. Incomplete revascularization, related to more extensive disease, is associated with an 18% decline in survival. These data suggest that it is important to avoid incomplete revascularization in octogenarians, but the supplementary endeavor required to perform functional complete revascularization does not improve survival.

Percutaneous treatment with drug-eluting stent vs bypass surgery in patients suffering from chronic stable angina with multivessel disease involving significant proximal stenosis in left anterior descending artery

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of drug-eluting stents (DES) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients suffering from chronic stable angina with multivessel disease, involving significant proximal stenosis in the left anterior descending artery (LAD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

All consecutive patients suffering from chronic stable angina with multivessel disease involving significant proximal LAD stenosis underwent DES implantation (n=600) or CABG (n=709) at our institution. At 2 years, the unadjusted mortality was significantly lower in the DES group than in the CABG group (2.2% vs 5.2%, P=0.004), but the adjusted risk of death was similar (odds ratio (OR) 0.74, 95%CI 0.28-1.97, P=0.555). Furthermore, both the adjusted rate of nonfatal myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular events was also comparable. However, the unadjusted and adjusted risk of major adverse cardiac cerebrovascular events in the DES was significantly higher than in the CABG (13.3% vs 9.6%, OR 2.71, 95%CI 1.56-4.74, P<0.001), which is probably attributed to the higher subsequent revascularization rate after DES implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

DES showed comparable long-term mortality for the treatment of multivessel disease involving significant proximal stenosis in LAD in comparison with CABG.

Relationship between myocardial viability and coronary run-off in jeopardized myocardium

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between coronary run-off and myocardial viability in jeopardized regions.

METHOD

We studied 50 patients (40 male, mean age: 55.63 +/- 10.54 years) with coronary artery stenosis >70% and ejection fraction <40% referred for viability study via dobutamine stress echocardiography. The relationship between coronary run-off and viability was evaluated. Good run-off demonstrates good or moderate and no run-off means poor or no run-off.

RESULTS

In the apical region, 33% of the segments with good antegrade run-off were viable and 67% nonviable. Also, 72% of the segments with no run-off were nonviable and 28% viable. In the midportion region, 70% of the segments with good antegrade run-off were viable and 30% nonviable; 50% of the segments with no run-off were nonviable and 50% viable. In the basal region, 85% of the segments with good antegrade run-off were viable and 15% nonviable; 19% of the segments with no run-off were nonviable and 81% viable. The proportion of the nonviable segments increased significantly from the basal to apical regions either with good (p < 0.001) or no run-off (p = 0.004). From 239 viable segments, 58.6% had antegrade, 15.4% retrograde, and 25.5% no run-off. Of 181 nonviable segments, 44% had antegrade, 34% retrograde, and 34.8% no run-off.

CONCLUSION

There was more susceptibility to nonviability in the apical regions despite good run-off, while the basal segments showed more viability in spite of having no run-off. The findings may be helpful for selecting patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular systolic dysfunction that benefit from revascularization.

The impact of placing multiple grafts to each myocardial territory on long-term survival after coronary artery bypass grafting

OBJECTIVE

Incomplete myocardial revascularization decreases survival for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. The effects of constructing multiple grafts to each major diseased artery territory are unknown. We aimed to determine the impact on long-term survival after coronary artery bypass grafting of placing multiple grafts to each myocardial territory.

METHODS

We reviewed data from 1129 consecutive patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting at our institution between 1997 and 2007 and compared outcomes between patients who received multiple grafts to each major diseased artery territory (n = 549) with those of patients who received single grafts to each territory (n = 580). We assessed long-term survival with Kaplan-Meier curves generated by log-rank tests, adjusting for confounding factors with Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

RESULTS

Patients who received multiple grafts to each major diseased artery territory had longer cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic crossclamp times than patients who received single grafts per territory. Patient groups had similar early outcomes, including 30-day mortalities (1.3% vs 1.4%, P > .999) and incidences of major adverse cardiac events (2.9% vs 2.2%, P = .57). Cox regression 10-year survival curves were also similar between groups (adjusted hazard ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.67-1.34, P = .74).

CONCLUSION

Patients who received multiple grafts to each major diseased artery territory had early outcomes similar to those who received single grafts per territory. Constructing multiple grafts to each major diseased artery territory increases operative time and does not improve long-term survival.

Complete versus incomplete revascularization in patients with multivessel disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the long-term prognostic implications of complete versus incomplete revascularization in multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES).

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with MVD provides better outcomes when complete revascularization is achieved. There is a paucity of data on the outcomes of complete versus incomplete revascularization of MVD patients undergoing PCI, and currently there is no data available with DES.

METHODS

Patients with MVD undergoing PCI with DES (sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stent) were included. Comparisons of long-term outcomes between completely versus incompletely revascularized patients were made. The primary outcome measure was the composite of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), or any revascularization. Secondary endpoints were the components of the composite endpoint.

RESULTS

A total of 508 patients were considered for this analysis: 212 (41.7%) and 296 (58.3%) had complete and incomplete revascularization, respectively. The median follow-up was 27.0 (interquartile range: 23.0-37.1) months. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, the hazard ratio (HR, 95% confidence interval) for complete revascularization was 0.43 (0.29-0.63, P < 0.0001) for the primary composite endpoint. Complete revascularization was associated with better outcomes for components of the composite endpoint: 0.37 (0.15-0.92, P = 0.03) for cardiac death, 0.34 (0.16-0.75 P = 0.008) for the composite of cardiac death or MI and 0.45 (0.29-0.69, P = 0.0003) for any repeat revascularization. This association was confirmed in a propensity-matched population.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete revascularization with DES of MVD patients is associated with lower rates of long-term adverse events.

Transmyocardial laser revascularization: from randomized trials to clinical practice. A review of techniques, evidence-based outcomes, and future directions

Cardiac surgeons are increasingly faced with a more complex patient who has developed a pattern of diffuse coronary artery disease that cannot be completely revascularized by CAGB alone. Considering the increased operative and long-term cardiac risks predicted by incomplete revascularization, and the documented operative and long-term benefits associated with sole therapy and adjunctive TMR in randomized patients with diffuse coronary artery disease, increased use of sole therapy and adjunctive TMR therapy is warranted.

Does off-pump coronary surgery endanger long term survival?

In this issue Ibrahim and co-authors report on technical hazards of off-pump (without heart lung machine) coronary surgery 1. Their findings are in line with meta-analyses of randomized trials which indicate that under-grafting and graft-failures are more common after off-pump than after standard operations. The risk that the objectives of coronary bypass surgery are endangered is discussed in relation to evidence based medicine. A moratorium is suggested until conclusive data are available.

Incomplete revascularization reduces survival benefit of coronary artery bypass grafting: role of off-pump surgery

OBJECTIVE

We sought to analyze the influence, if any, of incomplete revascularization and on/off-pump techniques on long-term mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting.

METHODS

A total of 9408 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, 8461 on pump and 947 off pump, operated on between 1995 and 2004 were included in the study. Adjusted hazard function for long-term mortality was estimated with Poisson regression analysis in a model that included variables reflecting completeness of revascularization, operative method (on/off pump), and background risk factors for death.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up after surgical intervention for survivors was 5.0 +/- 2.8 years (range, 0.5-10.5 years), with a total follow-up of 45,076 patient years. Leaving 1 diseased vascular segment without a bypass graft in 2- or 3-vessel disease did not increase the hazard ratio for death in comparison with complete revascularization (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.27; P = .60). In contrast, leaving 2 vascular segments without a bypass graft in 3-vessel disease was associated with an increased hazard ratio for death (hazard ratio, 1.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-2.85; P = .01). Incomplete revascularization was more common in the off-pump group (P < .001) in our study. If adjusting for incomplete revascularization, there was no significant influence of the use of on/off-pump techniques on the hazard ratio for death (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-1.40; P = .57).

CONCLUSIONS

Incomplete revascularization of patients with 3-vessel disease is an independent risk factor for increased long-term mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting. In contrast, the use of on- or off-pump techniques had no significant effect on survival after adjusting for incomplete revascularization.

Transmyocardial laser revascularization

It has been almost a decade since transmyocardial laser revascularization (TMR) was approved for clinical use in the United States. The safety of TMR was demonstrated initially with nonrandomized studies in which TMR was used as the only treatment for patients with severe angina. TMR efficacy was proven after multiple randomized controlled trials. These revealed significant angina relief compared to maximum medical therapy in patients with diffuse coronary disease not amenable to conventional revascularization. In light of these results, TMR has been used as an adjunct to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). By definition, patients treated with this combined therapy have more severe coronary disease and comorbidities that are associated with end-stage atherosclerosis. Combination CABG + TMR has resulted in symptomatic improvement without additional risk. The likely mechanism whereby TMR has provided benefit is the angiogenesis engendered by the laser-tissue interaction. Improved perfusion and concomitant improvement in myocardial function have been observed post-TMR. Additional therapies to enhance the angiogenic response include combining TMR with stem cell-based treatments, which appear to be promising future endeavors.

Early and mid-term impacts of cardiopulmonary bypass on coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with poor left ventricular dysfunction: a propensity score analysis

BACKGROUND

Cardiopulmonary bypass may exacerbate myocardial damage in compromised left ventricles. Early and mid-term outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) vs on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (On-pump CABG) were compared in patients with poor left ventricular dysfunction, using an analysis of a propensity score matching.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between December 2000 and November 2005, 1,473 patients underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in our institute and 153 patients who had a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) lower than 35% were enrolled. The OPCAB group contained 100 patients and the On-pump CABG group contained 53 patients. Preoperative risk factors were compared and 50 patients in each group were matched. The mean follow-up time was 35.5+/-17.3 months. Three deaths (3.0%) occurred in the matched cohort, with no significant difference between 2 groups. The operation time, ventilation time, intensive care unit admission time and occurrence of respiratory failure were significantly lower in the OPCAB group. The mean LVEF of the 2 groups improved significantly. The overall 6-year actuarial survival rates of the OPCAB and On-pump CABG group were 88.2% and 72.4% (p=0.2), respectively, and there were no significant differences in 6-year rates of freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (p=0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with poor left ventricular dysfunction improved myocardial function. Postoperative respiratory failure was significantly related to the cardiopulmonary bypass for surgical myocardial revascularization. Off-pump and On-pump surgical revascularization resulted in equivalent mid-term outcomes.

Can the EuroSCORE predict the early and mid-term mortality after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting?

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the role of the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) in the prediction of early-term and mid-term mortality in patients undergoing isolated off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB).

METHODS

From January 2002 to August 2006, 757 consecutive patients underwent isolated OPCAB. The patients' operative risks were calculated according to the standard and logistic EuroSCORE models. The cohort was classified into four subgroups according to both EuroSCORE scales. To evaluate the predictability, the expected mortality was compared with the observed mortality. The receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted and calibration was assessed. Mean follow-up was 32.8 +/- 13.9 months.

RESULTS

Ten (1.3%) in-hospital deaths occurred. The predicted total numbers of deaths by the EuroSCORE models were 34.2 (4.5%) for the standard EuroSCORE and 37.8 (5.0%) for the logistic EuroSCORE. The expected mortality rates were significantly higher than the observed mortality rates in all subgroups, except one. The area under curve (AUC) in in-hospital mortality was 0.72 for the standard EuroSCORE and 0.71 for the logistic EuroSCORE, but the tests of calibration for both EuroSCORE models were significant. Mid-term mortality was 3.6%. The AUC curve in mid-term mortality was 0.71 for the standard or logistic EuroSCORE. The calibration in both EuroSCORE models for mid-term mortality was nonsignificant, indicating good calibration.

CONCLUSIONS

Both EuroSCORE models overestimated the in-hospital mortality; however, both models showed good predictability for mid-term mortality. The EuroSCORE could be helpful in planning resource allocation and tailoring follow-up for patients undergoing isolated OPCAB.

Optimal revascularization strategies for multivessel coronary artery disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this article is to review the current status of optimal revascularization strategies in patients presenting with multivessel coronary artery disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Coronary artery bypass surgery is the gold standard for patients with multivessel disease. Recent developments in the interventional field, like drug-eluting stents, which significantly reduced restenosis and the need for repeat revascularizations, have cut back one of the largest limitations of percutaneous coronary intervention.

SUMMARY

There is currently little evidence to believe that in a general population, opting for either coronary artery bypass surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention would imply a better long-term survival. Coronary artery bypass surgery is still associated with higher rates of complete revascularization and a higher durability than percutaneous coronary intervention, resulting in lower rates of repeat revascularization. The current evidence, however, is based on sub-optimal inconclusive data from single center or multicenter registries. Until the results of several dedicated ongoing randomized trials are presented, the choice for a revascularization strategy should be made not only on the basis of feasibility but also by taking into account each patient's co-morbidities and risk factors. Careful monitoring of glycemic control and lipid concentrations and an optimal pharmacological treatment are at least as important in achieving an optimal outcome.

Importance of complete revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

The role of incomplete revascularization (ICR) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is controversial. We evaluated the impact of ICR on short- and long-term outcome in patients with AMI and multivessel disease (MVD) treated with percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) during index hospital stay.

METHODS

Single-center observational study covered 798 patients with MVD selected from 1486 consecutive patients with AMI treated with PCI. At discharge, 605 (75.8%) of the patients still had at least 1 diseased artery (ICR group); in 193, complete revascularization (CR) has been achieved (CR group). Any-cause mortality rate and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during hospitalization, within a follow-up period of 30 days and 29.7 months, were compared between both groups in the whole population and within the high-risk subgroups. Propensity model to predict the probability of CR according to 16 variables was used.

RESULTS

Mortality and MACE rates were significantly higher in ICR group than among completely revascularized subjects during short- and long-term observation (remote mortality 18.5% vs 7.2%, MACE 53.1% vs 24.3%, both P < .001). Higher mortality rate was also observed within the subgroups with diabetes (25.2% vs 4.8%), renal dysfunction (44.1% vs 13.8%), and lowered ejection fraction (26.5% vs 10.5%, all P < .05). Propensity-adjusted multivariate analysis showed that ICR was a significant and strong predictor of remote death (propensity-adjusted hazard ratio 2.01, 95% CI 1.71-2.31, P = .02) and MACE (hazard ratio 2.08, 95% CI 1.90-2.26, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Incomplete revascularization is a strong and independent risk factor of death and MACE in patients with AMI treated with PCI.

Long-Term Results of the Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Reconstruction With Left Internal Thoracic Artery

BACKGROUND

Recent refinements in percutaneous techniques have resulted in an increase in the numbers of patients with diffuse coronary artery disease who are referred to cardiac surgeons. Long-segmental reconstruction of the diffusely diseased left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery with the left internal thoracic artery (LITA) has been shown to be beneficial for patients with diffuse coronary artery disease. In this retrospective study, we analyzed the long-term outcomes obtained with this technique.

METHODS

Between April 1997 and February 2006, 3736 coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) operations were performed by our team. Of these cases, 524 patients (14%) with the diffusely diseased LAD underwent a long-segmental reconstruction procedure with a LITA graft.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 372 men (71%) and 152 women (29%), and the mean age was 56.5 +/- 8.2 years. The mean length of the arteriotomy incision was 4.5 +/- 1.2 cm (range, 2 to 10 cm). Postoperative mortality was 1.9%, and the myocardial infarction rate was 6.9%. At 3, 5, and 7 years, overall survival was 93.8% +/- 0.5%, 89.6% +/- 1.5%, and 85.5% +/- 2.6%, and actuarial freedom from angina recurrence was 94.5% +/- 1%, 88.5% +/- 2%, and 82.9% +/- 3%, respectively. Among survivors, interim angiographic evaluation was performed in 128 patients at a mean follow-up of 52.4 +/- 13.5 months, and the patency rate of the LITA-LAD anastomosis was 91.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with diffuse LAD disease present a major challenge for cardiovascular surgeons. The long-term results of long-segmental LAD reconstruction are very encouraging, and this approach may be used safely in this subgroup of patients.

Revascularization of Left Anterior Descending Artery With Drug-Eluting Stents: Comparison With Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

BACKGROUND

The proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD) is a challenging area for percutaneous interventions; therefore, coronary artery bypass grafting is often considered and sometimes performed even in patients with single-vessel disease involving the proximal LAD. This study compares mid-term results of LAD revascularization using drug-eluting stents (Cypher) with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB).

METHODS

From May 2002 to December 2003, 376 consecutive patients underwent myocardial revascularization of the LAD, 272 by Cypher and 104 by MIDCAB. After matching for age, sex, and extent of coronary artery disease, two groups of 83 patients each were used to compare the two revascularization modalities. The groups were similar; however, ejection fraction of less than 0.35 was more prevalent in the MIDCAB group and prior percutaneous coronary intervention in the Cypher group.

RESULTS

Thirty-day mortality was 1.1% in the MIDCAB and 0% in the Cypher group. Mean follow-up was 22.5 months. Two late cardiac deaths occurred in the MIDCAB group and one in the Cypher group (p = NS). Angina returned in 35% of the Cypher group and in 8.4% of the MIDCAB group (p < 0.001). There were 14 (16.8%) reinterventions in the Cypher compared with three (3.6%) in the surgical group (p = 0.005). Cox proportional hazard model showed that assignment to the Cypher group was the only independent predictor of reangina (hazard ratio [HR], 6.17, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.46 to 15.4). Treatment with Cypher was also an independent predictor of reintervention (HR 8.26, 95% CI, 1.68 to 40).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite improved results of percutaneous interventions with Cypher to the LAD, mid-term clinical outcome of patients treated with MIDCAB was better.