Cardiology is flow

Characterizing the expansive deformation of a bioresorbable polymer fiber stent

Polymeric vascular stents must employ other strategies than malleable deformation, as generally practiced with metal stents, to expand and withstand compressive stresses in situ. The stent expansion strategy must further consider induced flow perturbations and wall stresses that may injure the vessel wall and promote thrombogenesis. Analyzing the stresses furled stents undergo during balloon-assisted expansion is an important first step in achieving a better understanding of stent-wall mechanical interactions, thereby to improve stent function. To this end, we performed finite element (FE) analysis of the balloon-induced unfurling of an internally coiled, bioresorbable polymeric stent employing a 3D FE solid model of a 120 degrees symmetric stent segment and a large deformation finite strain formulation. Uni-axial tensile testing of stent fiber elastic to plastic yielding provided the mechanical property information, and the von Mises criterion was employed to establish the elastic-plastic transition in the FE model. The model was validated with pressure and deformation measurements obtained during stent expansion tests. The internal coils of this inner coil-outer coil design twisted as the stent expanded, leading to plastic yielding at the point of tangency of the inner and outer coils. The remaining stent fiber portions underwent elastic bending. Cross-sections revealed only the outside surface layer of the coiled fiber underwent plastic yielding. The interior elastic fiber was supported by this plastic shell. The analysis suggests that during balloon-induced expansion, local plastic yielding in torsion "sets" the stent fibers, imparting high radial collapse resistance. The results further suggest that the stent exerts non-uniform mechanical forces on the vessel wall during expansion.

Functional and anatomical diagnosis of coronary artery stenoses

BACKGROUND

Functional/physiological evaluation of coronary artery stenoses may be more important than anatomical measurements of severity. Optimization of thresholds for stenosis intervention and treatment endpoints depend on coupling functional hemodynamic and anatomical data. We sought to develop a single prognostic parameter correlating stenosis-specific anatomy, pressure gradient, and velocities that could be measured during catheterization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In vivo Experiments were performed in six swine (41 +/- 3 kg). The lumen area of the left anterior descending coronary artery was measured with intravascular ultrasound. An angioplasty balloon was inflated to create the desired intraluminal area obstructions. Fractional flow reserve (FFR), coronary flow reserve (CFR), and hyperemic-stenosis-resistance index were measured distal to the balloon at peak hyperemia with 10 mg intracoronary papaverine. A functional index:pressure drop coefficient (CDP) and a combined functional and anatomical index:lesion flow coefficient (LFC) were calculated from measured hyperemic pressure gradient, velocity, and percentage area stenosis. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The CDP and LFC correlated linearly and significantly with FFR and CFR. The CDP (R(2) = 0.72, P < 0.0001) correlated better than LFC (R(2) = 0.19, P < 0.003) with hyperemic-stenosis-resistance index. When LFC was correlated simultaneously with FFR and CFR, R(2) improved to 0.82 (P < 0.0001). Inclusion of percentage area stenoses concurrently with FFR and CFR marginally improved the correlation with LFC.

CONCLUSIONS

A dimensionless parameter combining measured pressure gradient, velocity, and area reduction data can optimally define the severity of coronary stenoses based on our preliminary results and could prove useful clinically.