Use of Monte Carlo simulation to design an optimized pharmacodynamic dosing strategy for meropenem

Current concepts in antimicrobial therapy against resistant gram-negative organisms: extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

The development of antimicrobial resistance among gram-negative pathogens has been progressive and relentless. Pathogens of particular concern include extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Classic agents used to treat these pathogens have become outdated. Of the few new drugs available, many have already become targets for bacterial mechanisms of resistance. This review describes the current approach to infections due to these resistant organisms and elaborates on the available treatment options.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the carbapanemes: focus on doripenem

Carbapenems are the most potent group of beta-lactam agents, having a broad spectrum of bactericidal activity against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria including anaerobes. Doripenem is a new carbapenem endowed with excellent bactericidal activity, a wide spectrum of antibacterial activity against difficult nosocomial pathogens, including extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producers. Its high stability in solution render it extremely flexible for dosing and infusion time. It is the only carbapenem which has been registered officially for administration as an extended infusion of more than 4 hours, which can thus enhance its potential clinical efficacy against difficult bacterial pathogens with MICs of 4-8 mg/L.

Nonlinear pharmacokinetics of piperacillin in healthy volunteers--implications for optimal dosage regimens

AIMS

(i) To describe the first-order and mixed-order elimination pathways of piperacillin, (ii) to determine the between occasion variability (BOV) of pharmacokinetic parameters and (iii) to propose optimized dosage regimens.

METHODS

We performed a five-period replicate dose study in four healthy volunteers. Each subject received 4g piperacillin as a single 5min intravenous infusion in each study period. Drug analysis was performed by HPLC. We used NONMEM and S-ADAPT for population pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte Carlo simulation to predict the probability of target attainment (PTA) with a target time of non-protein bound concentration above MIC >50% of the dosing interval.

RESULTS

A model with first-order nonrenal elimination and parallel first-order and mixed-order renal elimination had the best predictive performance. For a 70kg subject we estimated 4.40lh(-1) for nonrenal clearance, 5.70lh(-1) for first-order renal clearance, 170mgh(-1) for V(max) , and 49.7mgl(-1) for K(m) for the mixed-order renal elimination. The BOV was 39% for V(max) , 117% for K(m) , and 8.5% for total clearance. A 30min infusion of 4g every 6h achieved robust (≥90%) PTAs for MICs ≤12mgl(-1) . As an alternative mode of administration, a 5h infusion of 6g every 8h achieved robust PTAs for MICs ≤48mgl(-1) .

CONCLUSIONS

Part of the renal elimination of piperacillin is saturable at clinically used doses. The BOV of total clearance and volume of distribution were low. Prolonged infusions achieved better PTAs compared with shorter infusions at similar daily doses. This benefit was most pronounced for MICs between 12 and 48mgl(-1) .

Comparing outcomes of meropenem administration strategies based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles: a qualitative systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review evidence comparing traditional and alternative dosing strategies for meropenem, based on clinical and pharmacoeconomic outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE (1950-September 2009), EMBASE (1980-September 2009), and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-September 2009) were searched, using the terms meropenem, carbapenems, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics. Reference citations from publications identified were reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Articles discussing administration of meropenem to adults with normal renal function and comparing at least 2 regimens, 1 of which included the manufacturer-recommended regimen of 0.5 g or 1 g every 8 hours infused over 30 minutes, with clinical, pharmacodynamic, or pharmacoeconomic endpoints, were included. The pharmacodynamic endpoint of interest was percent time that the unbound drug concentration exceeded the minimal inhibitory concentration for a bacterial pathogen.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Sixteen studies were reviewed, which included 13 pharmacokinetic and dynamic assessments using Monte Carlo simulations, 5 clinical evaluations, and 3 pharmacoeconomic appraisals. Data on clinical and economic outcomes are largely nonrandomized retrospective analyses and case reports. Meropenem via intermittent prolonged infusion potentially increases the likelihood of achieving pharmacodynamic targets. However, a strong link with improved clinical outcomes is lacking. Smaller doses with shorter intervals appear to provide pharmacodynamic target attainment rates and clinical outcomes similar to those with traditional dosing, with potential pharmacoeconomic benefits. Meropenem via continuous infusion appears to increase the likelihood of achieving pharmacodynamic targets, compared with intermittent infusions. The sparsity of clinical evidence supporting this practice limits its broad application to practice. No studies have formally examined adverse effects with alternative dosing regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Meropenem alternative dosing strategies provide similar pharmacodynamic target attainment rates compared with traditional dosing strategies. Small doses with shorter interval dosing provide additional pharmacoeconomic benefits and similar clinical outcomes. Alternative dosing strategies for meropenem were largely studied in healthy subjects; individuals with pharmacokinetic parameters that differ significantly may be ideal subjects for empiric dose modification.

Summary trends for the Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection Program: a 10-year experience in the United States (1999-2008)

The Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection (MYSTIC) Program was a global, longitudinal antimicrobial resistance surveillance network of more than 100 medical centers worldwide monitoring the susceptibility of meropenem and selected other broad-spectrum comparator agents. In 1999, and from 2000 through 2008, a total of 10 or 15 United States (USA) medical centers each forwarded 200 nonduplicate clinical isolates from serious infections to a central processing laboratory. Over the 10-year period of this surveillance program, the activity of meropenem and an average of 11 other antimicrobial agents were assessed against a total of 27 289 bacterial isolates using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute reference methods. Meropenem consistently demonstrated low resistance rates against Enterobacteriaceae species isolates through 2008 and did not exhibit a widespread change in resistance rates over the monitored interval. In fact, the incidence of emerging carbapenemase-producing (KPC-type) Klebsiella spp. showed a decline in 2008 compared to the steeply increasing rates observed from 2004 to 2007. Moreover, the KPC serine carbapenemases have spread to other Enterobacteriaceae species monitored by the MYSTIC Program. Greatest increases in antimicrobial resistance rates were observed for the fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin) among all species monitored by the MYSTIC Program. Current susceptibility rates for meropenem when tested against prevalent pathogens were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (439 strains, 85.4% susceptible), Enterobacteriaceae (1537 strains, 97.3% susceptible), methicillin-susceptible staphylococci (460 strains, 100.0% susceptible), Streptococcus pneumoniae (125 strains, 80.2% at meningitis susceptibility breakpoints), other streptococci (159 strains, 90.0-100.0% susceptible), and Acinetobacter spp. (127 strains, 45.7% susceptible), the widest spectrum among beta-lactams tested in 2008 and throughout the last decade. Continued local surveillance of broad-spectrum agents following the completion of the MYSTIC Program (USA) appears critical to detect emerging resistances among pathogens causing the most serious infections requiring carbapenem agents.

Comparison of the activity of a human simulated, high-dose, prolonged infusion of meropenem against Klebsiella pneumoniae producing the KPC carbapenemase versus that against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model

We have previously demonstrated that a high-dose, prolonged-infusion meropenem regimen (2 g every 8 h [q8h]; 3-hour infusion) can achieve 40% free drug concentration above the MIC against Pseudomonas aeruginosa with MICs of <or=16 microg/ml. The objective of this experiment was to compare the efficacy of this high-dose, prolonged-infusion regimen against carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates with the efficacy against P. aeruginosa isolates having similar meropenem MICs. An in vitro pharmacodynamic model was used to simulate human serum concentrations. Eleven genotypically confirmed K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing isolates and six clinical P. aeruginosa isolates were tested for 24 h, and time-kill curves were constructed. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to verify meropenem concentrations in each experiment. Meropenem achieved a rapid >or=3 log CFU reduction against all KPC isolates within 6 h, followed by regrowth in all but two isolates. The targeted %fT>MIC (percent time that free drug concentrations remain above the MIC) exposure was achieved against both of these KPC isolates (100% fT>MIC versus MIC=2 microg/ml, 75% fT>MIC versus MIC=8 microg/ml). Against KPC isolates with MICs of 8 and 16 microg/ml that did regrow, actual meropenem exposures were significantly lower than targeted due to rapid in vitro hydrolysis, whereby targeted %fT>MIC was reduced with each subsequent dosing. In contrast, a >or=3 log CFU reduction was maintained over 24 h for all Pseudomonas isolates with meropenem MICs of 8 and 16 microg/ml. Although KPC and P. aeruginosa isolates may share similar meropenem MICs, the differing resistance mechanisms produce discordant responses to a high-dose, prolonged infusion of meropenem. Thus, predicting the efficacy of an antimicrobial regimen based on MIC may not be a valid assumption for KPC-producing organisms.

Comparative Pharmacodynamics of Intermittent and Prolonged Infusions of Piperacillin/Tazobactam Using Monte Carlo Simulations and Steady-State Pharmacokinetic Data from Hospitalized Patients

Background:

Prolonging the infusion of a β-lactam antibiotic enhances the time in which unbound drug concentrations remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT>MIC).

Objective:

To compare the pharmacodynamics of several dosing regimens of piperacillin/tazobactam administered by intermittent and prolonged infusion using pharmacokinetic data from hospitalized patients.

Methods:

Steady-state pharmacokinetic data were obtained from 13 patients who received piperacillin/tazobactam 4.5 g every 8 hours, infused over 4 hours. Monte Carlo simulations (10,000 pts.) were performed to calculate pharmacodynamic exposures at 50% fT>MIC for 4 intermittent-infusion regimens (3.375 g every 4 and 6 h, 4.5 g every 6 and 8 h) and 4 prolonged-infusion regimens (2.25 g, 3.375 g. 4.5 g, and 6.75 g every 8 h [4-h infusion]) of piperacillin/tazobactam using pharmacokinetic data for piperacillin. Cumulative fraction of response (CFR) was calculated using MIC data for 6 gram-negative pathogens (Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection, 2004-2007), and probability of target attainment (PTA) was calculated at MICs ranging from 1 μg/mL to 64 μ/g/mL

Results:

The CFR for 3.375 g every 4 hours (intermittent infusion) and 3.375–4.5 g every 8 hours (prolonged infusion) greater than or equal to 90.3% for Escherichia coli, Serratia marcescens, and Citrobacter spp. Increasing the prolonged-infusion dose to 6.75 g improved the CFR to greater than 90% for Enterobacter spp. For every regimen evaluated, the CFR was less than 90% for Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. At an MIC of 16 μg/mL, PTA was greater than 90% for one intermittent-infusion regimen (3.375 g every 4 h) and 3 prolonged-infusion regimens (≥3.375 g every 8 h). but no regimen achieved a PTA greater than 90% at an MIC of 64 μ/g/mL.

Conclusions:

At doses greater than or equal to 3.375 g every 8 hours, 4-hour infusions of piperacillin/tazobactam achieved excellent target attainment with lower daily doses compared with standard regimens at MICs less than or equal to 16 μg/mL

Steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of piperacillin/tazobactam administered by prolonged infusion in hospitalised patients

The objective of this study was to evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of piperacillin/tazobactam, administered by prolonged infusion, in hospitalised patients requiring antimicrobial therapy. Thirteen patients received 4.5 g every 8 h (q8h), infused over 4 h, and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by non-compartmental methods. Monte Carlo simulations (10,000 patients) were performed to calculate the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) for seven gram-negative pathogens using minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) data from the Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection (2004-2007, USA) as well as the probability of target attainment (PTA) at MICs ranging from 1 microg/mL to 64 microg/mL. The pharmacodynamic target was free piperacillin concentration remaining above the MIC for 50% of the dosing interval. Mean+/-standard deviation maximum and minimum serum concentrations, half-life, volume of distribution at steady-state and systemic clearance of piperacillin were 108.2+/-31.7 microg/mL, 27.6+/-26.3 microg/mL, 2.1+/-1.2 h, 22.1+/-4.0 L and 8.6+/-3.0 L/h, respectively. The CFR was > 90% for Escherichia coli, Serratia marcescens and Citrobacter spp., 88.6% for Enterobacter spp., 87% for Klebsiella pneumoniae, 85.5% for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 52.8% for Acinetobacter spp. The PTA was 100%, 81.1% and 12.3% at MICs of < or = 16 microg/mL, 32 microg/mL and 64 microg/mL, respectively. Piperacillin/tazobactam 4.5 g q8h infused over 4 h provides excellent target attainment for bacterial pathogens with MICs < or = 16 microg/mL. However, the CFR was < 90% for four of the seven gram-negative pathogens evaluated.

Pharmacodynamics of SMP-601 (PTZ601) against vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in neutropenic murine thigh infection models

SMP-601 (also known as PTZ601, PZ-601, or SM-216601) is a novel parenteral carbapenem with potent activity against multidrug-resistant gram-positive pathogens, including vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The pharmacodynamics of SMP-601 against VREF and MRSA were investigated in neutropenic murine thigh infection models. The percentage of the dosing interval that the unbound SMP-601 concentration exceeded the MIC (f%T>MIC) was the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic parameter that correlated most closely with efficacy with R(2) values of 0.81 to 0.84 for two strains of VREF and 0.92 to 0.93 for two strains of MRSA, whereas the R(2) values for the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h divided by the MIC were 0.12 to 0.89, and the R(2) values for the peak level divided by the MIC were 0 to 0.22. The f%T>MIC levels required for static or killing efficacy against two strains of VREF (9 to 19%) apparently were lower than those against two strains of MRSA (23 to 37%). These results suggested that SMP-601 showed time-dependent in vivo efficacy against VREF and MRSA, and SMP-601 had a sufficient therapeutic effect against VREF infections at lower exposure conditions compared to those for with MRSA infections.

Pharmacodynamic-based clinical pathway for empiric antibiotic choice in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Because of the high frequency of multidrug resistant bacteria in our intensive care units (ICUs), we implemented a ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) clinical pathway based on unit-specific minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions and pharmacodynamic modeling in 3 of our ICUs.

METHODS

This was a prospective, observational evaluation with a historical control group in adult patients (n = 168) who met clinical and radiologic criteria for VAP. Monte Carlo simulation was used to determine antibiotic regimens having the greatest likelihood of achieving bactericidal exposures against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antibiotic regimens were incorporated into an ICU-specific computerized clinical pathway as empiric agents of choice.

RESULTS

Pharmacodynamic modeling found 3-hour infusions of cefepime 2 g every 8 hours or meropenem 2 g every 8 hours plus tobramycin and vancomycin would provide the greatest probability of empirically treating VAP in these ICUs. Infection-related mortality was reduced by 69% (8.5% vs 21.6%; P = .029), infection-related length of stay was shorter (11.7 +/- 8.1 vs 26.1 +/- 18.5; P < .001), and fewer superinfections were observed in patients treated on the pathway. A number of patients with nonsusceptible P aeruginosa were successfully treated with high-dose, 3-hour infusion regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

In our ICUs where multidrug resistant bacteria are common, an approach considering ICU-specific antibiotic MICs coupled with pharmacodynamic dosing strategies resulted in improved outcomes and shorter duration of treatments.

Comparison of 2002–2006 OPTAMA Programs for US Hospitals: Focus on Gram-Negative Resistance

Background:

Resistance among gram-negative bacteria is increasing within the US.

Objective:

To determine pharmacodynamic target attainment rates for 10 antimicrobials against selected gram-negative bacilli and compare these results with previous Optimizing Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment Using the MYSTIC Antibiogram (OPTAMA) assessments.

Methods:

A 5000-patient Monte Carlo simulation using data from population pharmacokinetic studies was employed to estimate the pharmacokinetic profiles for standard and/or prolonged infusion (PI) regimens of cefepime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, ertapenem, imipenem, levofloxacin, meropenem, piperacillin–tazobactam, and tigecycline. Minimum inhibitory concentration data were obtained from intensive care units of 15 US hospitals participating in the 2006 MYSTIC (Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection) study for 640 Escherichia coli, 618 Klebsiella spp., and 606 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. Cumulative fraction of response (CFR) was calculated using pharmacodynamic targets for each antibiotic and compared with results from the 2002 and 2004 OPTAMA studies.

Results:

Against E. coli, CFRs greater than 92% were maintained for all regimens except the fluoroquinolones (CFR range 69.4–72%), which showed a 7% decrease compared with 2004. The presence of Klebsiella spp. producing KPC-type carbapenemases with associated multidrug resistance resulted in a 7% or greater drop in CFR of standard regimens relative to 2004. Despite these resistant phenotypes, high-dose PI regimens (2 g every 8 hours as 3-hour PI) of cefepime and meropenem achieved CFRs of 97% and 95.8%, respectively. Excluding 3 KPC-harboring hospitals resulted in CFR increases to greater than 98% for carbapenems and cefepime and greater than 88% for all other agents tested, except tigecycline. Against P. aeruginosa, the fluoroquinolones had the lowest CFR (55.8–63.9%), followed by imipenem (74.6-80.4%). The most predictable activity was seen with cefepime 2 g every 12 hours or higher (>90%), ceftazidime 2 g every 8 hours (97.9%), and meropenem 1-2 g every 8 hours (86.7–92.6%). Use of PI for piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem increased CFRs by 6% and 4%, respectively, over standard infusions.

Conclusions:

Relative to previous years, an increase in resistance was noted among gram-negative bacilli to common antibiotics, resulting in disproportionate decreases in pharmacodynamic target attainment. The use of PI for β-lactams may help to overcome these decreases.

Acinetobacter baumannii: emergence of a successful pathogen

Acinetobacter baumannii has emerged as a highly troublesome pathogen for many institutions globally. As a consequence of its immense ability to acquire or upregulate antibiotic drug resistance determinants, it has justifiably been propelled to the forefront of scientific attention. Apart from its predilection for the seriously ill within intensive care units, A. baumannii has more recently caused a range of infectious syndromes in military personnel injured in the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts. This review details the significant advances that have been made in our understanding of this remarkable organism over the last 10 years, including current taxonomy and species identification, issues with susceptibility testing, mechanisms of antibiotic resistance, global epidemiology, clinical impact of infection, host-pathogen interactions, and infection control and therapeutic considerations.

Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of antibacterials in the Intensive Care Unit: setting appropriate dosing regimens

Patients admitted to Intensive Care Units (ICUs) are at very high risk of developing severe nosocomial infections. Consequently, antimicrobials are among the most important and commonly prescribed drugs in the management of these patients. Critically ill patients in ICUs include representatives of all age groups with a range of organ dysfunction related to severe acute illness that may complicate long-term illness. The range of organ dysfunction, together with drug interactions and other therapeutic interventions (e.g. haemodynamically active drugs and continuous renal replacement therapies), may strongly impact on antimicrobial pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients. In the last decade, it has become apparent that the intrinsic pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties are the major determinants of in vivo efficacy of antimicrobial agents. PK/PD parameters are essential in facilitating the translation of microbiological activity into clinical situations, ensuring a successful outcome. In this review, we analyse the typical patterns of antimicrobial activity and the corresponding PK/PD parameters, with a special focus on a PK/PD dosing approach of the antimicrobial agent classes commonly utilised in the ICU setting.

Susceptibility of clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the Northern Kyushu district of Japan to carbapenem antibiotics, determined by an integrated concentration method: evaluation of the method based on Monte Carlo simulation

In empirical antibacterial therapy, regional surveillance is expected to yield important information for the determination of the class and dosage regimen of antibacterial agents to be used when dealing with infections with organisms such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, in which strains resistant to antibacterial agents have been increasing. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of five carbapenem antibiotics against P. aeruginosa strains isolated in the Northern Kyushu district of Japan between 2005 and 2006 were measured, and 100 strains for which carbapenem MICs were < or =0.5-32 microg/ml were selected. In this study, MIC was measured by two methods, i.e., the common serial twofold dilution method and an integrated concentration method, in which the concentration was changed, in increments of 2 microg/ml, from 2 to 16 microg/ml. The MIC(50)/MIC(90) values for imipenem, meropenem, biapenem, doripenem, and panipenem, respectively, with the former method were 8/16, 4/16, 4/16, 2/8, and 16/16 microg/ml; and the values were 6/10, 4/12, 4/10, 2/6, and 10/16 microg/ml with the latter method. The MIC data obtained with both methods were subjected to pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis with Monte Carlo simulation to calculate the probability of achieving the target of time above MIC (T>MIC) with each carbapenem. The probability of achieving 25% time above the MIC (T>MIC; % of T>MIC for dosing intervals) and 40% T>MIC against P. aeruginosa with any dosage regimen was higher with doripenem than with any other carbapenem tested. When the two sets of MIC data were subjected to PK/PD analysis, the difference between the two methods in the probability of achieving each % T>MIC was small, thus endorsing the validity of the serial twofold dilution method.

The role of carbapenems in the treatment of severe nosocomial respiratory tract infections

The prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria continues to increase, particularly in patients in the intensive care unit with nosocomial pneumonia. The intention of this review is to provide an overview of severe nosocomial pneumonia, carbapenems and the problem of bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents. Attention was focused on the efficacy, safety and pharmacodynamics of imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem and doripenem. Issues on the impact of appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy for nosocomial pneumonia patients considered at risk for resistant pathogens are discussed. Critical decision making regarding the use of carbapenems for treating severe nosocomial pneumonia requires careful consideration of the four Ds of optimal antimicrobial therapy: right Drug, right Dose, De-escalated to pathogen-directed therapy and right Duration of therapy.

Intrapulmonary pharmacodynamics of high-dose levofloxacin in subjects with chronic bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

The objective of this study was to determine the plasma and intrapulmonary pharmacokinetic parameters of intravenously administered levofloxacin in subjects with stable chronic lung disease. Three doses of 1000 mg levofloxacin were administered once daily to 16 adult subjects divided into four groups of 4 subjects each. Standardised bronchoscopy and timed bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) were performed at 4 h, 8 h, 12 h and 24 h following administration of the last dose. Blood was obtained for drug assay prior to drug administration, at the end of the last infusion (maximum concentration (Cmax)) and at the time of BAL. Levofloxacin was measured using a high-performance liquid chromatographic tandem mass spectrometric (HPLC/MS/MS) technique. Plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and alveolar cell (AC) pharmacokinetics were derived using non-compartmental methods. Cmax/MIC(90) and area under the concentration-time curve for 0-24 h after the last dose (AUC(0-24 h)/MIC(90) ratios were calculated for respiratory pathogens with minimum inhibitory concentrations for 90% of the organisms (MIC(90)) of 0.03-2 microg/mL. The Cmax (mean+/-standard deviation), AUC(0-24h) and half-life were, respectively, 9.2+/-2.7 microg/mL, 130 microg h/mL and 8.7 h for plasma, 22.8+/-12.9 microg/mL, 260 microg h/mL and 7.0 h for ELF and 76.3+/-28.7 microg/mL, 1492 microg h/mL and 49.5 h for ACs. Levofloxacin concentrations were quantitatively greater in ACs than in ELF or plasma at all time points, however only the differences between AC concentration and ELF or plasma concentrations in the 4-h and 8-h time groups were statistically significant. Cmax/MIC(90) and AUC/MIC(90) ratios in ELF were, respectively, 11.4 and 130 for Mycoplasma pneumoniae, 22.8 and 260 for Streptococcus pneumoniae, 91.2 and 1040 for Chlamydia pneumoniae and 760 and 8667 for Haemophilus influenzae. In ACs the ratios were 38.2 and 746 for M. pneumoniae, 76.3 and 1492 for S. pneumoniae, 305 and 5968 for C. pneumoniae and 2543 and 49 733 for H. influenzae. In conclusion, Cmax/MIC(90) and AUC/MIC(90) ratios provide a pharmacokinetic rationale for once-daily administration of a 1000 mg dose of levofloxacin and are favourable for the treatment of respiratory infection in patients with chronic lung disease.

Evaluating Empiric Treatment Options for Secondary Peritonitis Using Pharmacodynamic Profiling

BACKGROUND

Selecting an appropriate agent for empiric antibiotic therapy for secondary peritonitis is challenging. The pathogens responsible, aerobic gram-negative bacilli in particular, are becoming more resistant to antibiotics. The purpose of this study was to predict the ability of common antimicrobial regimens to achieve optimal pharmacodynamic exposure against aerobic bacteria implicated in secondary peritonitis, while considering current national resistance trends.

METHODS

Monte Carlo simulation was used to model pharmacodynamic endpoints and compare the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) for imipenem-cilastatin, meropenem, ertapenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin against isolates of species associated with secondary peritonitis. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions for isolates collected in North America were obtained from the 2004 MYSTIC database. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived from the literature; the endpoints evaluated included free drug time above the MIC (fT(>MIC)) and the area under the concentration-time curve to MIC ratio (AUC:MIC).

RESULTS

The simulation predicted that several compounds would have a superior probability of providing appropriate coverage of aerobic bacteria: Imipenem-cilastatin (98.6% CFR at 1 g q8h), meropenem (98.2% CFR at 1 g q8h), ertapenem (91.7% CFR at 1 g q24h), piperacillin/ tazobactam (93.7% CFR at 3.375 g q6h), ceftazidime (91.1% CFR at 2 g q8h), and cefepime (92.9% CFR at 1 g q12h and 95.8% CFR at 2 g q12h). Ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin exhibited CFRs < 82%.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering contemporary susceptibility data for aerobic bacteria, monotherapy with any of the three carbapenems or piperacillin/tazobactam 3.375 g q6h would provide optimal exposure for the pathogens commonly encountered in secondary peritonitis. Cefepime (in combination with metronidazole to provide anti-anaerobic coverage) also would be an acceptable choice, as would ceftazidime given at 2 g q8h (again in combination with metronidazole). Despite the popularity of combination therapy based on ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, or ceftriaxone with metronidazole, these choices appear to be inferior to the other options because of emerging antibiotic resistance, particularly in E. coli.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis and dosing regimen optimization of meropenem in adult patients

The objectives of this study were to develop a meropenem population pharmacokinetic model using patient data and use it to explore alternative dosage regimens that could optimize the currently used dosing regimen to achieve higher likelihood of pharmacodynamic exposure against pathogenic bacteria. We gathered concentration data from 79 patients (ages 18-93 years) who received meropenem 0.5, 1, or 2 g over 0.5- or 3-hour infusion every 8 hours. Meropenem population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using the NONMEM program. A 2-compartment model fit the data best. Creatinine clearance, age, and body weight were the most significant covariates to affect meropenem pharmacokinetics. Monte Carlo simulation was applied to mimic the concentration-time profiles while 1 g meropenem was administrated via infusion over 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 hours. The 3-hour prolonged infusion improved the likelihood of obtaining both bacteriostatic and bactericidal exposures most notably at the current susceptibility breakpoints.

Reevaluation of current susceptibility breakpoints for Gram-negative rods based on pharmacodynamic assessment

Although pharmacodynamic (PD) modeling is now being considered for decision support for susceptibility breakpoint determination against Gram-negative bacteria, these PD-derived breakpoints should be verified using a clinically applicable population of organisms. In this analysis, a 5000-patient Monte Carlo simulation was used to determine PD breakpoints, the highest 2-fold MIC in which the probability of bactericidal target attainment (PTA) remained > or = 90%. Percent susceptibilities for 639 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 103 Acinetobacter baumannii, 705 Escherichia coli, and 418 Klebsiella spp. collected during the 2004 Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection surveillance study were then defined according to the PD-derived breakpoint (%S(PD)) and compared with the current Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)-defined breakpoints (%S(CLSI)). %S(PD) and %S(CLSI) were compared with the bactericidal PTA for each pathogen population to determine the degree of agreement. Resulting PD breakpoints were drug and dose dependent; moreover, values were commonly 2 to 4 MIC dilutions lower than CLSI breakpoints. Overall, %S(PD) more closely agreed with the PTA for the tested beta-lactam and fluoroquinolone dosing regimens. In contrast, %S(CLSI) overestimated PTA for many dosing regimens, especially against Pseudomonas: piperacillin/tazobactam 4.5 g qid (+9.7%), ciprofloxacin 0.4 g bid (+13.7%) and 0.4 g tid (+9.3%), and levofloxacin 0.5 g every 24 h (+22.4%) and 0.75 g every 24 h (+9.9%). Differences were most pronounced against the nonfermenting Gram-negative bacteria and were not observed among the Enterobacteriaceae. As a result, a new method of breakpoint classification is proposed, which is dosing regimen and pathogen specific, and is designed to denote isolates as susceptible only if target bactericidal exposures are achievable with the dosing regimen selected.

Application of antimicrobial pharmacodynamic concepts into clinical practice: focus on beta-lactam antibiotics: insights from the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists

In recent years there have been tremendous strides in understanding the relationship between the pharmacodynamics of beta-lactams and microbiologic response. For beta-lactams, in vitro and animal studies suggest that the amount of time in which free or non-protein-bound antimicrobial concentration exceeds the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the organism (fT>MIC) is the best predictor of bacterial killing and microbiologic response. Using population pharmacokinetic modeling and Monte Carlo simulation, it is possible to integrate pharmacokinetics, a pharmacodynamic target, and microbiologic surveillance data to generate empiric beta-lactam dosing strategies that maximize the likelihood of achieving fT>MIC associated with near maximal bactericidal effect against the range of pathogens encountered in clinical practice. At Albany Medical Center Hospital, these mathematical modeling techniques were used to devise alternative dosing schemes for piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem, and cefepime. These alternative schemes optimized fT>MIC at a lower total daily dose than would be employed with traditional dosing methods. Moreover, they achieved the targeted fT>MIC with less administration time/day than would be needed for continuous infusion.

Comparative performance of different stochastic methods to simulate drug exposure and variability in a population

Monte Carlo simulations (MCSs) are increasingly being used to predict the pharmacokinetic variability of antimicrobials in a population. However, various MCS approaches may differ in the accuracy of the predictions. We compared the performance of 3 different MCS approaches using a data set with known parameter values and dispersion. Ten concentration-time profiles were randomly generated and used to determine the best-fit parameter estimates. Three MCS methods were subsequently used to simulate the AUC(0-infinity) of the population, using the central tendency and dispersion of the following in the subject sample: 1) K and V; 2) clearance and V; 3) AUC(0-infinity). In each scenario, 10000 subject simulations were performed. Compared to true AUC(0-infinity) of the population, mean biases by various methods were 1) 58.4, 2) 380.7, and 3) 12.5 mg h L(-1), respectively. Our results suggest that the most realistic MCS approach appeared to be based on the variability of AUC(0-infinity) in the subject sample.

Pharmacodynamic evaluation of meropenem and cefotaxime for pediatric meningitis: a report from the OPTAMA program

OBJECTIVE

To determine the probability of meropenem (Merrem, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals L.P., Wilmington, DE, USA) and cefotaxime (Claforan, Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bridgewater, NJ, USA) achieving bactericidal exposures in the cerebrospinal fluid against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitidis, and Haemophilus influenzae.

METHODS

A 5,000-patient Monte Carlo simulation in a population of 10-year-old children with meningitis was conducted. Pediatric pharmacokinetic data were derived from the literature. Pathogen minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were obtained from common bacteria that had caused meningitis collected during pediatric clinical trials. Time above the MIC exposures in the cerebrospinal fluid was calculated. Bactericidal exposure or probability of target attainment was defined as 40% and 50% time above the MIC for meropenem and cefotaxime, respectively. High cumulative fractions of responses were defined as >90% probability of target attainment against the populations of bacteria.

RESULTS

Meropenem was calculated to achieve 94.7%, 94.3%, and 96.1% cumulative fractions of response against S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and N. meningitidis, respectively. Cefotaxime only achieved a high likelihood of bactericidal attainment against N. meningitidis (91.6%). Against S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae, cefotaxime was only calculated to achieve 84.3% and 84.8% cumulative fractions of response, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In a simulated population of 10-year-old children, meropenem had a high likelihood of attaining bactericidal exposures in the cerebrospinal fluid. Cefotaxime had a >90% cumulative fraction of response against only N. meningitidis. Therefore, at the doses simulated, meropenem may be a more appropriate empiric choice for the treatment of bacterial meningitis in pediatric patients presumed to be caused by these pathogens until culture and susceptibility data are available.

Impact of sample size on the performance of multiple-model pharmacokinetic simulations

Monte Carlo simulations are increasingly used to predict pharmacokinetic variability of antimicrobials in a population. We investigated the sample size necessary to provide robust pharmacokinetic predictions. To obtain reasonably robust predictions, a nonparametric model derived from a sample population size of >/=50 appears to be necessary as the input information.

Algunas reflexiones acerca de la administración de antibióticos betalactámicos en infusión continua

Numerous studies on continuous intravenous infusion of betalactam antibiotics have indicated that this could be a useful strategy for treating nosocomial infections as well as exacerbations of pulmonary infections in patients with cystic fibrosis and episodes of febrile neutropenia. From the pharmacodynamic viewpoint, betalactam antibiotics have a time-dependent behavior. Thus, the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic index that best correlates with therapeutic efficacy appears to be the time during which free antibiotic concentrations remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the infecting microorganism. Continuous infusion of betalactams successfully optimizes this pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic index. Furthermore, some studies have shown that this therapeutic strategy may be favorable economically.

Intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of high-dose levofloxacin in healthy volunteer subjects

The objective of this study was to determine the plasma and intrapulmonary pharmacokinetic parameters of intravenously administered levofloxacin in healthy volunteers. Three doses of either 750 mg or 1000 mg levofloxacin were administered intravenously to 4 healthy adult subjects (750 mg) to 20 healthy adult subjects divided into five groups of 4 subjects (1000 mg). Standardised bronchoscopy and timed bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) were performed following administration of the last dose. Blood was obtained for drug assay prior to drug administration and at the time of BAL. Levofloxacin was measured in plasma, BAL fluid and alveolar cells (ACs) using a sensitive and specific combined high-performance liquid chromatographic tandem mass spectrometric technique (HPLC/MS/MS). Plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and AC pharmacokinetics were derived using non-compartmental methods. The maximum plasma drug concentration to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio (C(max)/MIC(90)) and the area under the drug concentration curve to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio (AUC/MIC(90)) during the dosing interval were calculated for potential respiratory pathogens with MIC(90) values from 0.03 microg/mL to 2 microg/mL. In the 1000 mg dose group, the C(max) (mean+/-standard deviation (S.D.)), AUC(0-8h) and half-life were: for plasma, 9.2+/-1.9 microg/mL, 103.6 microg h/mL and 7.45 h; for ELF, 25.8+/-7.9 microg/mL, 279.1 microg h/mL and 8.10h; and for ACs, 51.8+/-26.2 microg/mL, 507.5 microg h/mL and 14.32 h. In the 750 mg dose group, the C(max) values in plasma, ELF and ACs were 5.7+/-0.4, 28.0+/-23.6 and 34.2+/-18.7 microg/mL, respectively. Levofloxacin concentrations were significantly higher in ELF and ACs than in plasma at all time points. For pathogens commonly associated with community-acquired pneumonia, C(max)/MIC(90) ratios in ELF ranged from 12.9 for Mycoplasma pneumoniae to 859 for Haemophilus influenzae, and AUC/MIC(90) ratios ranged from 139 to 9303, respectively. The C(max)/MIC(90) ratios in ACs ranged from 25.9 for M. pneumoniae to 1727 for H. influenzae, and AUC/MIC(90) ratios ranged from 254 to 16917, respectively. The C(max)/MIC(90) and AUC/MIC(90) ratios provide a pharmacokinetic rationale for once-daily administration of a 1000 mg dose of levofloxacin and are favourable for the treatment of community-acquired respiratory pathogens.

Applying antimicrobial pharmacodynamics to resistant gram-negative pathogens

PURPOSE

Guided antibiotic adjustment for the treatment of multidrug-resistant, gram-negative pathogens is explored.

SUMMARY

Multidrug-resistant pathogens are being isolated with increasing frequency, while the production of novel agents to circumvent resistance has slowed to a near halt. Hence, antimicrobial adjustment based on drug pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties has moved to the forefront of treatment. Pharmacodynamic principles for major classes of antimicrobials are reviewed, and the use of susceptibility reports to optimize pharmacodynamics to treat gram-negative infections is described. The need for the application of antimicrobial pharmacodynamics continues to grow as resistance to the agents becomes more common. Susceptibility reports, including antibiograms, and their limitations are briefly discussed. The resistance profiles of the beta-lactams (including carbapenems), aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines and glycylcyclines, and the polymyxins are reviewed, and the pharmacodynamic optimization of these profiles is explored.

CONCLUSION

Various mechanisms account for resistance of bacteria to antibiotics. The appropriate use of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics can guide antibiotic therapy and enhance the likelihood of success.

An integrated pharmacoeconomic approach to antimicrobial formulary decision-making

PURPOSE

The utility of a novel interdisciplinary approach to antimicrobial formulary decision-making was studied.

METHODS

Pseudomonas aeruginosa minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distribution data for cefepime and ceftazidime were retrieved from nonrepeat isolates obtained from November 2002 to October 2003. Unbound drug exposures were simulated for 5000 patients using the Monte Carlo method. Weighted target attainment rates (TARs) were calculated for cefepime and ceftazidime 1 g every 8 hours and 1 g every 12 hours (infused over 0.5, 2, and 4 hours), using three representative pharmacodynamic targets (percentage of time above the MIC of 67%, 100%, and 400%).

RESULTS

MIC data for 1230 nonrepeat P. aeruginosa were analyzed. The MIC at which 90% of the P. aeruginosa isolates were inhibited was 16 and 32 mg/L for cefepime and ceftazidime, respectively. Drug acquisition cost was the highest with cefepime 1 g given every 8 hours (37.56 dollars/day), followed by cefepime 1 g every 12 hours (25.04 dollars/day) and ceftazidime 1 g every 8 hours (22.26 dollars/day). When infused over 0.5 hour, the highest TAR was achieved with cefepime 1 g every 8 hours (82%), followed by ceftazidime 1 g every 8 hours (77%) and cefepime 1 g every 12 hours (66%); ceftazidime 1 g every 8 hours was 70% more cost-effective than cefepime 1 g every 8 hours. Cefepime 1 g every 12 hours, infused over 4 hours, increased the TAR to 89% and was similar in cost-effectiveness to ceftazidime 1 g every 8 hours infused over 0.5 hour.

CONCLUSION

An integrated pharmacoeconomic approach to antimicrobial formulary decision-making addressed local resistance patterns, population pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, dosing regimens, and drug acquisition costs. This method appeared to be more realistic and objective than the conventional approach of considering only drug acquisition costs, especially for agents in a similar structural or functional class.

Continuous infusion beta-lactams for intensive care unit pulmonary infections

This study evaluated the pharmacodynamics of continuous infusion beta-lactams against pulmonary isolates of Gram-negative bacteria from patients managed in intensive care units (ICUs) in the USA. Multiple 10,000-patient Monte Carlo simulations were performed by integrating pharmacokinetic data from healthy individuals with 2408 MICs from the 2002 Intensive Care Unit Surveillance System database. These pharmacodynamic simulations suggested that continuous infusion regimens of cefepime, aztreonam, ceftazidime and piperacillin-tazobactam 13.5 g have the greatest likelihood of achieving pharmacodynamic targets against isolates of Enterobacteriaceae in the ICU. Beta-lactams are unlikely to achieve pharmacodynamic targets against Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Acinetobacter baumannii when administered as monotherapy.

Intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of meropenem

The objective of this study was to determine the plasma and intrapulmonary pharmacokinetic parameters of intravenously administered meropenem in healthy volunteers. Four doses of 0.5 g, 1.0 g or 2.0 g meropenem were administered intravenously to 20, 20 and 8 healthy adult subjects, respectively. Standardised bronchoscopy and timed bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) were performed following administration of the last dose. Blood was obtained for drug assay prior to drug administration and at the time of BAL. Meropenem was measured in plasma, BAL fluid and alveolar cells (ACs) using a combined high pressure liquid chromatographic-mass spectrometric technique. Plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and AC pharmacokinetics were derived using non-compartmental methods. Cmax/MIC90 (where Cmax is the maximum plasma concentration and MIC90 is the minimum inhibitory concentration required to inhibit 90% of the pathogen), AUC/MIC90 (where AUC is the area under the curve for the mean concentration-time data), intrapulmonary drug exposure ratios and percent time above MIC90 during the dosing interval (%T > MIC90) were calculated for common respiratory pathogens with MIC90 values of 0.12-4 microg/mL. In the 0.5 g dose group, the Cmax (mean+/-S.D.), AUC(0-8 h) and half-life for plasma were, respectively, 25.8+/-5.8 microg/mL, 28.57 microg h/mL and 0.77 h; for ELF the values were 5.3+/-2.5 microg/mL, 12.27 microg h/mL and 1.51 h; and for ACs the values were 1.0+/-0.5 microg/mL, 4.30 microg h/mL and 2.61 h. In the 1.0 g dose group, the Cmax, AUC(0-8 h) and half-life for plasma were, respectively, 53.5+/-19.7 microg/mL, 55.49 microg h/mL and 1.31 h; for ELF the values were 7.7+/-3.1 microg/mL, 15.34 microg h/mL and 0.95 h; and for ACs the values were 5.0+/-3.4 microg/mL, 14.07 microg h/mL and 2.17 h. In the 2.0 g dose group, the Cmax, AUC(0-8 h) and half-life for plasma were, respectively 131.7+/-18.2 microg/mL, 156.7 microg h/mL and 0.89 h. The time above MIC in plasma ranged between 28% and 78% for the 0.5 g dose and between 45% and 100% for the 1.0 g and 2.0 g doses. In ELF, the time above MIC ranged from 18% to 100% for the 0.5 g dose and from 25% to 88% for the 1.0 g dose. In ACs, the time above MIC ranged from 0% to 100% for the 0.5 g dose and from 24% to 100% for the 1.0 g dose. Time above MIC in ELF and ACs for the 2.0 g dose was not calculated because of sample degradation. The prolonged T > MIC90 and high intrapulmonary drug concentrations following every 8 h administration of 0.5-2.0 g doses of meropenem are favourable for the treatment of common respiratory pathogens.

Use of Monte Carlo simulation to assess the pharmacodynamics of β-lactams against pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in children: A report from the OPTAMA program

BACKGROUND

Assessing the likelihood of achieving bactericidal pharmacodynamic exposures against Pseudomonas aeruginosa with intravenous antimicrobial regimens would provide insights into the selection of empiric therapy in the pediatric population.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to use pharmacodynamic modeling to determine the likelihood of various pediatric antibiotic regimens achieving bactericidal exposures against P aeruginosa in children.

METHODS

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for meropenem (20 and 40 mg/kg q8h), imipenem (15 and 25 mg/kg q6h), ceftazidime (50 mg/kg q8h), cefepime (50 mg/kg q8h), and piperacillin/tazobactam (75 mg/kg q6h) against P aeruginosa isolates from 2 pediatric institutions. A 5000-patient Monte Carlo simulation was performed to predict attainment of pharmacodynamic targets against P aeruginosa for each of these regimens in a population of 10-year-olds. Optimal regimens were defined as those that had a > or =90% likelihood of attaining target exposures.

RESULTS

At institution 1, high-dose imipenem, high-dose meropenem, and ceftazidime achieved bactericidal pharmacodynamic exposures (likelihood of target attainment: 94%, 92%, and 92%, respectively). No other regimen was associated with a high probability of attaining bactericidal exposure (low-dose imipenem, 87%; cefepime, 85%; low-dose meropenem, 84%; piperacillin/tazobactam, 60%). At institution 2, no regimen was associated with a high likelihood of attaining bactericidal exposure; the calculated probabilities were cefepime, 78%; ceftazidime, 65%; high-dose meropenem, 58%; high-dose imipenem, 57%; low-dose imipenem, 54%; low-dose meropenem, 47%; and piperacillin/tazobactam, 47%. A lack of agreement between attainment of bactericidal exposures and percent susceptibility was apparent for many of the regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Few regimens demonstrated a high likelihood of achieving bactericidal exposures against P aeruginosa at these institutions. Importantly, percent susceptibility overestimated attainment of the bactericidal target for some regimens, suggesting that further study is necessary in pediatric patients. The findings of this study highlight differences in target attainment and MIC distributions between institutions, emphasizing the importance of using institution-specific data when selecting empiric antimicrobial therapy.

Comparison of pharmacodynamic target attainment between healthy subjects and patients for ceftazidime and meropenem

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the pharmacodynamics of two beta-lactams--ceftazidime and meropenem--in healthy subjects versus patients.

DESIGN

Monte Carlo simulation based on published pharmacokinetic studies.

SUBJECTS

One hundred and ninety-seven participants (75 healthy volunteers and 122 patients) from published pharmacokinetic studies of ceftazidime or meropenem.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Data on total body clearance and volume of distribution for ceftazidime and meropenem in healthy subjects and patients were obtained from published studies. Monte Carlo simulations were performed based on the pharmacokinetics from each study for ceftazidime 1000 mg every 8 hours and meropenem 1000 mg every 8 hours against isolates of Escherichia coli , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Acinetobacter baumannii , and Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected from North and South America. We calculated the likelihood of obtaining bactericidal exposures (50% time above the minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] for ceftazidime and 40% time above the MIC for meropenem) for each combination of pharmacokinetic study data and MIC distribution. Linear regression was used to compare target attainments for healthy subjects versus patients. Only three drug-pathogen combinations differed in target attainment between healthy subjects and patients: ceftazidime against P. aeruginosa in North America and meropenem against E. coli and P. aeruginosa in South America. The regression line of target attainment for patients versus healthy subjects had a slope of 1.04 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.983-1.093) and a y intercept of -3.73 (95% CI -8.265-0.827, r2 = 0.992). The beta values for slope and intercept did not differ to a statistically significant extent between the regression line and the line of identity (p=0.264).

CONCLUSION

The pharmacodynamic target attainment calculated with healthy subject pharmacokinetic data was predictive of patient target target attainment for ceftazidime and meropenem.

Pharmacodynamics of antimicrobials for the empirical treatment of nosocomial pneumonia: A report from the OPTAMA Program

OBJECTIVE

To compare the probability of achieving specific pharmacodynamic exposures of commonly used intravenous antibiotics for the empirical treatment of nosocomial pneumonia against those pathogens most commonly implicated in the disease.

DESIGN

Ten thousand-subject Monte Carlo simulation.

SETTING

Research center.

SUBJECT

None.

INTERVENTIONS

Pharmacodynamic analysis was conducted for the following antimicrobials at standard doses: meropenem, imipenem-cilastatin, ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, and ciprofloxacin. Prevalence of causative pathogens was based on the 2000 SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Study, and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were obtained using the 2003 US MYSTIC database. The probabilities of each drug and dosing regimen in achieving pharmacodynamic targets were calculated. Bactericidal targets were defined as 40% T>MIC for the carbapenems, 50% T>MIC for other beta-lactams, and an area under the curve (AUC)/MIC ratio of 125 for ciprofloxacin. A sensitivity analysis was performed using two alternate models to determine the impact of varying pathogen prevalence on target attainment.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Meropenem and imipenem provided high probabilities of achieving their bactericidal target of 40% T>MIC, with target attainments of 98% for all regimens. At the bactericidal end point of 50% T>MIC, cefepime 2 g every 8 hrs displayed the highest target attainment at 99.9%, followed by cefepime 2 g every 12 hrs, ceftazidime 2 g every 8 hrs, piperacillin/tazobactam 4.5 g every 6 hrs and 3.375 g every 6 hrs, cefepime 1 g every 12 hrs, and ceftazidime 1 g every 8 hrs with target attainments of 95.0%, 92.5%, 92.3%, 91.3%, 90.3%, and 67.9%, respectively. Ciprofloxacin presented the lowest probability of achieving its bactericidal target of an AUC/MIC ratio of 125, with target attainments of 54.7% and 12.0% when given as 400 mg every 8 hrs and 400 mg every 12 hrs, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Meropenem, imipenem, cefepime, ceftazidime (2 g every 8 hrs), and piperacillin/tazobactam have high probabilities of achieving adequate pharmacodynamic exposures when given for the empirical treatment of nosocomial pneumonia in the absence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Ceftazidime 1g every 8 hrs and ciprofloxacin produce low target attainment rates and will not likely result in high clinical success rates when given as monotherapy.

Pharmacodynamic Modeling of β-lactam Antibiotics for the Empiric Treatment of Secondary Peritonitis: A Report from the OPTAMA Program

BACKGROUND

In this report of the OPTAMA (Optimizing Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment using the MYSTIC Antibiogram) program, we utilized Monte Carlo simulation to compare the probabilities of achieving bactericidal time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (%T > MIC) exposures for imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg q6h and 1000 mg q8h, meropenem 500 mg q6h and 1000 mg q8h and piperacillin/tazobactam 3.375 g q6h and 4.5 g q8h in the empiric treatment of secondary peritonitis.

METHODS

The prevalence of pathogens causing secondary peritonitis was identified from the primary surgical and infectious diseases literature. Data for these pathogens with respect to MIC were obtained from the 2003 MYSTIC surveillance study and weighted by the prevalence of each pathogen. A sensitivity analysis varying the prevalence of P. aeruginosa was performed with two additional models to determine the robustness of the data. Pharmacokinetic parameters, obtained from previously published studies in healthy volunteers were used to simulate the %T > MIC for 10,000 patients receiving imipenem-cilastatin, meropenem, and piperacillin/tazobactam. The likelihood of obtaining bactericidal exposure is reported.

RESULTS

Empiric utilization of imipenem-cilastatin and meropenem 500 mg q6h and 1000 mg q8h regimens achieved 99.6%-99.7% likelihood of bactericidal exposure. Piperacillin/ tazobactam 3.375 g q6h and 4.5 g q8h produced bactericidal target attainments of 92.9% and 85.2%, respectively. Models simulating higher prevalence of P. aeruginosa reduced the likelihood of bactericidal exposure for piperacillin/tazobactam regimens significantly and had little effect on the carbapenems.

CONCLUSION

All of the beta-lactams used in the current analysis were predicted to achieve high target attainment consistently for the empiric treatment of secondary peritonitis. However, imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg q6h and 1000 mg q8h, meropenem 1000 mg q8h and 500 mg q6h, and piperacillin/tazobactam 3.375 g q6h achieved the highest likelihood. These, in particular, would be effective choices for the empiric treatment of secondary peritonitis.

Application and impact of population pharmacokinetics in the assessment of antiretroviral pharmacotherapy

Population pharmacokinetics has been an important technique used to explore and define relevant sources of variation in drug exposure and response in patient populations. This has been especially true in the area of antiretroviral therapy where the assurance of adequate and sustained drug exposure of multiple agents is highly correlated with therapeutic success. Population pharmacokinetic analyses across the four drug classes and 20 US FDA-approved products used to treat HIV have been published to date. The published reports were predominantly based on actual clinical trials conducted in HIV-infected patients with one or more agents administered. Modelling and simulation approaches have been used in the evaluation of antiretroviral agent outcomes incorporating problematic design and analysis factors such as sparse plasma sampling, data imbalance and censored data. Additional benefits of population modelling approaches applied to the investigation of antiretroviral agents include the ability to assess dosing compliance, understanding and quantifying drug-drug interactions in order to select dosing regimens and the screening of new drug candidates. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models have been used to characterise the relationship between drug exposure and virological and immunological response, and to predict clinical outcome. These models offer the best opportunity for individualising and optimising patient therapy, particularly when adjusted for adherence/compliance. The impact of population pharmacokinetics in the area of antiretroviral therapy can be directly assessed by its role in the validation of surrogate markers such as viral RNA load, therapeutic drug monitoring and the management of individual patient outcomes via exposure-toxicity relationships. Each of these population pharmacokinetic outcomes has contributed to the current regulatory environment, specifically in the area of accelerated approval of new antiretroviral agents.

Evaluation by monte carlo simulation of the pharmacokinetics of two doses of meropenem administered intermittently or as a continuous infusion in healthy volunteers

Meropenem is a broad-spectrum carbapenem antibacterial agent. In order to optimize levels in plasma relative to the MICs, the ideal dose level and dosage regimen need to be determined. The pharmacokinetics of meropenem were studied in two groups, each comprising eight healthy volunteers who received the following doses: 500 mg as an intravenous infusion over 30 min three times a day (t.i.d.) versus a 250-mg loading dose followed by a 1,500 mg continuous infusion over 24 h for group A and 1,000 mg as an intravenous infusion over 30 min t.i.d. versus a 500-mg loading dose followed by a 3,000-mg continuous infusion over 24 h for group B. Meropenem concentrations in plasma and urine were determined by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry and high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection, respectively. Pharmacokinetic calculations were done by use of a two-compartment open model, and the data were extrapolated by Monte Carlo simulations for 10,000 simulated subjects for pharmacodynamic evaluation. There were no significant differences in total clearance and renal clearance between group A and group B or between the intermittent treatment and the continuous infusion. The analyses of the probability of target attainment by MIC for the high- and low-dose continuous infusions were robust up to MICs of 4 mg/liter and 2 mg/liter, respectively. The corresponding values for intermittent infusions were only 0.5 mg/liter and 0.25 mg/liter. When these observations were correlated with MICs obtained from the MYSTIC database, intermittent infusion results in adequate activity against two of the most common nosocomially acquired pathogens, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterobacter cloacae. However, against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the evaluation shows a clear advantage of high-dose therapy administered as a continuous infusion. We believe that in the empirical therapy situation, the continuous-infusion mode of administration is most worth the extra efforts. We conclude that clinical trials for evaluation of the continuous infusions of meropenem in critically ill patients are warranted.

Pharmacodynamic profiling of piperacillin in the presence of tazobactam in patients through the use of population pharmacokinetic models and Monte Carlo simulation

The primary objectives of this analysis were to determine which pharmacokinetic model most accurately describes the elimination pathways for piperacillin in the presence of tazobactam through population pharmacokinetic modeling and to characterize its pharmacodynamic profile. Once the optimal pharmacokinetic model was identified, Monte Carlo simulation of 10,000 subjects with ADAPT II was performed to estimate the probability of attaining a target free-piperacillin concentration greater than the MIC for 50% of the dosing interval for 3.375 g every 6 h or every 4 h given as a 0.5-h infusion at each MIC between 0.25 and 32 microg/ml. In the population pharmacokinetic analysis, measurements of bias and precision, observed-predicted plots, and r2 values were highly acceptable for all three models and all three models were appropriate candidates for the Monte Carlo simulation evaluation. Visual comparison of the distribution of the piperacillin concentrations at the pharmacodynamic endpoint--h 3 concentrations of a 6-h dosing interval--between the simulated populations and raw data revealed that the linear model was most reflective of the raw data at the pharmacodynamic endpoint, and the linear model was therefore selected for the target attainment analysis. In the target attainment analysis, administration of 3 g of piperacillin every 6 h resulted in a robust target attainment rate that exceeded 95% for MICs of < or =8 mg/liter. The 4-h piperacillin administration interval had a superior pharmacodynamic profile and provided target attainment rates exceeding 95% for MICs of < or =16 mg/liter. This study indicates that piperacillin-tazobactam should have utility for empirical therapy of hospital-onset infections.