Imatinib mesylate dose escalation is associated with durable responses in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia after cytogenetic failure on standard-dose imatinib therapy

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic correlation and blood-level testing in imatinib therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia

Imatinib is the current standard of care in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), inducing durable responses and prolonged progression-free survival. However, plasma exposure to the drug from a given dosing regimen can vary widely among patients. Reasons for this may include incomplete adherence, intrinsic variations in the metabolism of imatinib, and drug-drug interactions. Data from two recent studies have shown a correlation between imatinib trough plasma concentration and clinical response, leading to suggestions that maintaining imatinib blood concentrations above approximately 1000 ng/ml might be associated with improved outcomes. In patients who do not respond as well as expected to initial imatinib treatment, measurement of trough plasma concentration could assist with decisions about whether to increase the dose. Blood-level testing may also be helpful in other clinical scenarios: for example, when poor adherence is suspected, adverse reactions are unusually severe, or there is a possible drug-drug interaction. Further work is required to confirm prospectively the link between imatinib plasma concentrations and response, and to define effective trough concentrations in different patient populations. However, based on the current data, imatinib blood-level testing seems to be a useful aid when making clinical decisions in CML.

Mean cell volume can be an early predictor for the cytogenetic response of chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with imatinib?

Imatinib-induced macrocytic anemia was known to result from c-kit inhibition in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, recent studies showed that the prevalence of anemia is increased with high trough imatinib level and increased doses of imatinib influence decreased proliferation of burst forming units-erythroids (BFU-Es). The aim of this study was to evaluate the continuously increased mean cell volume (MCV) level's correlation with cytogenetic response and the favorable outcome in early chronic phase (CP)-CML patients. Clinical importance of MCV level was evaluated to correlate with cytogenetic response and compared with Sokal score, a known excellent prognostic parameter of cytogenetic response (CCR) in 84 early CP-CML patients. The patients with early and continuously increased MCV level irrespective of anemia achieved higher CCR after 12 months of imatinib therapy than patients with non-CCR (p=0.011). When the value was compared with low Sokal score, elevated MCV was independent predictor of CCR (RR=12.925, p=0.002 vs. RR=35.445, p<0.001). Furthermore, the patients with early and continuously increased MCV level had a higher probability of maintaining CCR than non-increased level (p=0.019). Increased MCV level was surrogate marker of achievement and durability to CCR for early CP-CML patients in the present study.

Initial treatment for patients with CML

For adult patients who present with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase it is now generally agreed that initial treatment should start with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib at 400 mg daily. Five years after starting imatinib about 60% of these patients will be in complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), still taking imatinib; an appreciable proportion of these will have achieved a major molecular response, defined as a 3-log reduction in the level of BCR-ABL1 transcripts in their blood. The patients in CCyR seem to have a very low risk of relapse to chronic phase or of progression to advanced phase. Other patients may be resistant to imatinib or may experience significant side effects that require change of therapy. The best method of monitoring responding patients is to enumerate Philadelphia chromosome–positive marrow metaphases at 3-month intervals until CCyR and to perform RQ-PCR for BCR-ABL1 transcripts at 3-month intervals after starting imatinib. The recommendations for defining “failure” and “sub-optimal response” proposed by the European LeukemiaNet in 2006 have proved to be a major contribution to assessing responses in individual patients and are now being updated. Patients who fail imatinib may respond to second-generation TKIs, but allogeneic stem cell transplantation still plays an important role for eligible patients who fare badly with TKIs. Patients who present in advanced phases of CML should be treated initially with TKI alone or with TKI in conjunction with cytotoxic drugs, but their overall prognosis is likely to be much inferior to that of those presenting in early chronic phase.

Monitoring disease response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in CML

The remarkable progress made in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) over the past decade has been accompanied by steady improvements in our capacity to accurately and sensitively monitor response to therapy. After the initial target of therapy, complete cytogenetic response (CCR), is achieved, peripheral blood BCR-ABL transcript levels measured by real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (RQ-PCR) define the subsequent response targets, major and complete molecular response (MMR and CMR). The majority of patients on first-line imatinib therapy achieve a “safe haven” defined as a confirmed MMR, but 20% to 30% stop imatinib due to intolerance and/or resistance. Many imatinib-resistant patients can be effectively treated with second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), but the actual drug selected should be based on the resistance profile of each inhibitor, in addition to issues of tolerance and disease phase. The main purpose of monitoring response with cytogenetics and RQ-PCR is to identify patients likely to achieve better long-term outcome if they are switched early to second-line therapy, either another TKI or an allograft. Mutation screening is most valuable in cases of loss of response to imatinib or a second-line TKI, but there are other settings where a high yield of mutations may justify regular mutation screening.

Mechanisms of resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia and recent therapeutic strategies to overcome resistance

Given its relative rarity, it may at first seem surprising that chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has garnered so much attention over the last decade. Yet, the advances in molecular pathogenesis that have been derived from studying this leukemia have clearly benefited all of oncology. Moreover, the strides in drug design and development that have also ensued around CML have given rise to what others have called a molecular revolution in cancer therapy. While a majority of patients with chronic phase CML (CP-CML) have an excellent durable response to imatinib (Gleevec, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland), a clear minority will unfortunately have signs of primary or secondary resistance to therapy. Significant efforts geared toward understanding the molecular mechanisms of imatinib resistance have yielded valuable insights into the biology of drug trafficking into and out of cells, epigenetic control of cellular processes, alterations in enzymatic structures, and the rational structural-based design of small molecule enzyme inhibitors. This review will describe the efforts at understanding the pathogenesis of imatinib resistance and the molecular rationale for the development of second- and now third-generation therapies for patients with CML.