Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer and its impact on surgical staging

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in the evaluation of suspected lung cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer is still not fully explored. This prospective study aimed to define the effectiveness of EUS-FNA as an adjunct to computer tomography (CT) and bronchoscopy in the evaluation of suspected lung cancer in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

Over a period of 20 weeks, the data of 16 consecutive patients suspected of lung cancer on account of respiratory symptoms, and/or the findings of either a mass or mediastinal lymph nodes on helical CT, who were referred for evaluation by EUS, were prospectively collected. Fourteen of these patients underwent sequential bronchoscopy followed by EUS-FNA in the same setting.

RESULTS

Bronchoscopy was performed in 15 patients, while EUS was performed in all 16 patients. Bronchoscopy diagnosed 9 cases of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but was falsely negative in 3 cases of malignancies, which were all established by EUS-FNA of mediastinal lymph nodes (2 cases of NSCLC and 1 case of esophageal squamous cell cancer). EUS-FNA also diagnosed advanced NSCLC in another patient who did not undergo bronchoscopy, such that eventually 13 patients were diagnosed to have malignancies. Distant metastases were diagnosed by EUS-FNA in 4 cases of NSCLC (2 cases of left adrenal gland and 2 cases of pancreatic metastases). Two patients were diagnosed to have sarcoidosis and 1 patient was diagnosed to have pneumoconiosis eventually.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-FNA is useful as an adjunct to CT and bronchoscopy in the evaluation of suspected lung cancer.

Nine-year single center experience with cervical mediastinoscopy: complications and false negative rate

BACKGROUND

Mediastinoscopy is a valuable tool for evaluating mediastinal pathology and is essential for establishing treatment strategies in most patients with lung cancer. We sought to determine the complication and false negative rate for mediastinoscopy in an institution that routinely performs this procedure.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 2,145 consecutive mediastinoscopies at a single institution between April 1996 and April 2005. Demographics and complications were analyzed. In patients with lung cancer who underwent subsequent resection, the false negative rate was calculated.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 61 +/- 0.4 years, and 58% (n = 1,253) were male. Pathology included lung cancer (n = 1,459), metastatic disease (n = 78), lymphoma (n = 51), and other benign disease (n = 557). Twenty-three patients (1.07%) experienced complications including hemorrhage (n = 7, 0.33%), vocal cord dysfunction (n = 12, 0.55%), tracheal injury (n = 2, 0.09%), and pneumothorax (n = 2, 0.09%). There was 1 death (0.05%) after pulmonary artery injury. Five of the 7 vascular injuries occurred during biopsy of level 4R. Three hundred and forty-three patients (23.5%) with lung cancer had positive mediastinoscopies. The false negative rate was 56 of 1,019 (5.5%) among lung cancer patients undergoing resection. Thirty-two (57%) of the false negatives were due to metastatic disease in lymph nodes not normally biopsied during cervical mediastinoscopy (levels 5, 6, 8, or 9).

CONCLUSIONS

Although invasive, mediastinoscopy identified locally advanced disease in a significant percentage of this lung cancer population and was associated with a low false negative rate. Complications after mediastinoscopy were uncommon. These results support the continued routine use of mediastinoscopy.

Transesophageal ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration improves mediastinal staging in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and normal mediastinum on computed tomography

The aim of the current study was to prospectively assess the value of transesophageal ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in the mediastinal staging of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and CT negative for lymph node (LN) metastases, candidates for surgical resection. EUS-FNA was performed using the standard technique and LNs with at least one morphological feature suggestive of malignancy were sampled. Pathological exam of surgical specimens or tumor positive cytology was used as gold standard. Forty seven patients were included, 21% of whom had advanced disease (pN2) undetected by CT. EUS-FNA demonstrated LN metastases in 50% of them (11% of the whole series), and there were no false positives, resulting in a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy of 50%, 100%, 100%, 88% and 89%, respectively. In conclusion, EUS-FNA improves mediastinal staging in patients with NSCLC and CT negative for mediastinal nodes. Therefore, EUS-FNA should be considered in any patient with NSCLC and no distant metastases before any therapeutic decision is taken.