Trigonal versus extratrigonal botulinum toxin-A: a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and adverse events

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Botulinum toxin-A (BoNT-A) is a potent neurotoxin that is an effective treatment for patients with pharmacologically refractory detrusor overactivity (DO). Data assessing the effectiveness of trigonal BoNT-A are limited. This study evaluates adverse events (AEs) and short-term efficacy associated with trigonal and extratrigonal BoNT-A.

METHODS

Electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane database) were searched for studies comparing trigonal and extratrigonal BoNT-A for DO. Meta-analyses were performed using the random effects model. Outcome measures included incidence of AEs and short-term efficacy.

RESULTS

Six studies describing 258 patients met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis did not show significant differences between trigonal and extratrigonal BoNT-A for acute urinary retention (AUR; 4.2 vs 3.7 %; odds ratio [OR]: 1.068, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.239-4.773; P =  0.931) or high post-void residual (PVR; 25.8 vs 22.2 %; OR: 0.979; 95 % CI: 0.459-2.088; P =  0.956). The incidence of urinary tract infection (UTI; 7.5 vs 21.0 %; OR: 0.670; 95 % CI: 0.312-1.439; P =  0.305), haematuria (15.8 vs 25.9 %; OR: 0.547; 95 % CI: 0.264-1.134; P =  0.105) and post-operative muscle weakness (9.2 vs 11.3 %; OR: 0.587; 95 % CI: 0.205-1.680, P =  0.320) was similar in both groups. Finally, differences in short-term cure rates between two study arms were not statistically significant (52.9 vs 56.9 %; OR: 1.438; 95 % CI: 0.448-4.610; P =  0.542).

CONCLUSIONS

Although data are limited, no significant differences between trigonal and extratrigonal BoNT-A in terms of AEs and short-term efficacy were observed. Additional randomised controlled trials are required to define optimal injection techniques and sites for administering intra-vesical BoNT-A.

Reasons for re-excision after lumpectomy for breast cancer: insight from the American Society of Breast Surgeons Mastery(SM) database

BACKGROUND

There is marked variability of re-excision rates after initial lumpectomy for breast cancer. Reasons for re-excision and variability across surgeons have not been well documented. We hypothesized the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) Mastery(SM) Program can identify reasons for re-excision.

METHODS

Data from January 1 to 7 November 2013 were evaluated in the ASBrS Mastery(SM) Program to determine re-excision lumpectomy rate (RELR). On 1 June 2013, a tool to track reasons for re-excision was developed. Variation in re-excision rate by surgeon and patient characteristics was performed by Chi square test and Fisher's test for univariate analysis, then logistic regression with backwards elimination method for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

For 6,725 patients undergoing initial lumpectomy for cancer, 328 surgeons reported 1,451 (21.6 %) patients had one or more re-excisions. The most common reasons for re-excision were ink positive margins in 783 (49.7 %), margin <1 mm (34.3 %), and margin 1-2 mm (7.2 %). By multivariate analysis, re-excision rates were lower in patients aged less than 35 years, with White (non-) Hispanic ethnicity, and, among surgeons in solo practice, more years in practice and higher-volume practice.

CONCLUSION

Half of re-excisions after initial lumpectomy were performed for margins that are positive. Most of the remainder were for negative close (<1-2 mm) margins. This information corroborates surgeon survey data regarding reasons for re-excision and provides proof of concept the Mastery(SM) Program can capture surgical outcome data in real time, providing opportunity and a method for future performance improvement.

Extent of primary breast cancer surgery: standards and individualized concepts

Surgery is still a main therapeutic option in breast cancer treatment. Nowadays, methods of resection and reconstruction vary according to different tumors and patients. This review presents and discusses standards of care and arising questions on how radical primary breast cancer surgery should be according to different clinical situations. In most early breast cancer patients, breast conservation is the method of choice. The discussion on resection margins is still controversial as different studies show conflicting results. Modified radical mastectomy is the standard in locally advanced breast cancer patients, although there are different promising approaches to spare skin or even the nipple-areola complex. A sentinel node biopsy is the standard of care in clinically node-negative invasive breast cancer patients, whereas the significance of axillary lymphonodectomy seems to be questioned through a number of different findings. Although there are interesting findings to modify surgical approaches in very young or elderly breast cancer patients, it will always be an individualized approach if we do not adhere to current guidelines. Up to date, there are no special surgical procedures in BRCA mutation carriers or patients of high-risk families.

Influence of boost radiotherapy in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ breast cancer: a multicenter, retrospective study in Korea (KROG 11-04)

To estimate the effect of boost radiotherapy on local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) breast cancer. We included patients from nine institutions who met the following criteria: having Tis, age 18 years or older, having breast conserving surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy within 12 weeks after surgery. From 1995 through 2006, 728 patients were analyzed retrospectively by the Korean Radiation Oncology Group. All patients received whole-breast radiation therapy (WBRT) after BCS. 232 patients (31.9 %) also received boost radiation therapy (RT) (median 10 Gy). After median follow-up of 82 months, 5-year LRFS was 98.4 % and 10-year LRFS was 95.8 % for all patients. There was no statistically significant difference of LRFS between the boost and no-boost groups. Nineteen (2.6 %) patients had ipsilateral breast recurrences, including 12 of invasive recurrence and 7 DCIS. The presence of the HER2 receptor was associated with more invasive recurrences. Nine (1.2 %) patients developed contralateral breast cancer, including six invasive breast cancer and three DCIS. In the multivariate analysis, only the margin status was a significant prognostic factor for LRFS. Boost RT was not associated with further improvement of local control in DCIS after BCS and WBRT. HER2 receptor-positive patients may need further treatment with the anti-HER2 agents.

Breast cancer: from Halsted to Harney

The management of breast cancer has evolved in the last 40 years to now encompass not only treating the cancer in the most effective way, but also to detect and treat cancers before they can pose a risk to patients. This evolution in therapy and diagnostics has moved away from treating patients with the maximum amount of therapy they can tolerate towards a new paradigm where patents receive the minimum treatment to be most efficacious.

Trends in surgery for screen-detected and interval breast cancers in a national screening programme

Background

This population-based study aimed to evaluate trends in surgical approach for screen-detected cancer versus interval breast cancer, and to determine the factors associated with positive resection margins.

Methods

Screening mammograms of women aged 50–75 years, who underwent biennial screening in a Dutch breast-screening region between 1997 and 2011, were included. Patient and tumour characteristics were compared between women who underwent mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for screen-detected or interval cancer, and women with a negative or positive resection margin after BCS.

Results

Some 417 013 consecutive screening mammograms were included. A total of 2224 screen-detected and 825 interval cancers were diagnosed. The BCS rate remained stable (mean 6·1 per 1000 screened women; P = 0·099), whereas mastectomy rates increased significantly during the study from 0·9 (1997–1998) to 1·9 (2009–2010) per 1000 screened women (P &lt; 0·001). The proportion of positive resection margins for invasive cancer was 19·6 and 7·6 per cent in 1997–1998 and 2009–2010 respectively (P &lt; 0·001), with significant variation between hospitals. Dense breasts, preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, microcalcifications, architectural distortion, tumour size over 20 mm, axillary lymph node metastasis and treating hospital were independent risk factors for mastectomy. Interval cancer, image-guided tumour localization, microcalcifications, breast parenchyma asymmetry, tumour size greater than 20 mm, lobular tumour histology, low tumour grade, extensive invasive component and treating hospital were independent risk factors for positive resection margins.

Conclusion

Mastectomy rates doubled during a 14-year period of screening mammography and the proportion of positive resection margins decreased, with variation among hospitals. The latter observation stresses the importance of quality control programmes for hospitals treating women with breast cancer.

Narrowing down the focus: what are the main predictive markers for ductal carcinoma in situ?

SUMMARY 

Ductal carcinoma in situ accounts for approximately a quarter of newly diagnosed breast cancer nowadays. It is not life threatening per se, but confers an increased risk for subsequent invasive cancers. Optimal management should be based on the tumor characteristics and tailored to the risk of subsequent recurrence and invasive events. Prediction for recurrence risk has been determined mainly with clinical and histopathologic factors. However, they are imperfect, probably owing to the lack of standardized methods for assessment. Ongoing efforts have been shifted to the use of molecular factors, as well as prediction of noninvasive and invasive recurrences separately. These molecular factors seem to be more powerful in predicting invasive and noninvasive recurrence. However, their emerging roles still need to be validated.

Treatment outcome of ductal carcinoma in situ patients treated with postoperative radiation therapy

Purpose

To evaluate the outcome of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients who underwent surgery followed by radiation therapy (RT).

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 106 DCIS patients who underwent surgery followed by postoperative RT between 1994 and 2006. Ninety-four patients underwent breast-conserving surgery, and mastectomy was performed in 12 patients due to extensive DCIS. Postoperative RT was delivered to whole breast with 50.4 Gy/28 fx. Tumor bed boost was offered to 7 patients (6.6%). Patients with hormonal receptor-positive tumors were treated with hormonal therapy.

Results

The median follow-up duration was 83.4 months (range, 33.4 to 191.5 months) and the median age was 47.8 years. Ten patients (9.4%) had resection margin <1 mm and high-grade and estrogen receptor-negative tumors were observed in 39 (36.8%) and 20 (18.9%) patients, respectively. The 7-year ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR)-free survival rate was 95.3%. Resection margin (<1 or ≥1 mm) was the significant prognostic factor for IBTR in univariate and multivariate analyses (p < 0.001 and p = 0.016, respectively).

Conclusion

Postoperative RT for DCIS can achieve favorable treatment outcome. Resection margin was the important prognostic factor for IBTR in the DCIS patients who underwent postoperative RT.

A randomized prospective study of lumpectomy margin assessment with use of MarginProbe in patients with nonpalpable breast malignancies

Background

The presence of tumor cells at the margins of breast lumpectomy specimens is associated with an increased risk of ipsilateral tumor recurrence. Twenty to 30 % of patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery require second procedures to achieve negative margins. This study evaluated the adjunctive use of the MarginProbe device (Dune Medical Devices Ltd, Caesarea, Israel) in providing real-time intraoperative assessment of lumpectomy margins.

Methods

This multicenter randomized trial enrolled patients with nonpalpable breast malignancies. The study evaluated MarginProbe use in addition to standard intraoperative methods for margin assessment. After specimen removal and inspection, patients were randomized to device or control arms. In the device arm, MarginProbe was used to examine the main lumpectomy specimens and direct additional excision of positive margins. Intraoperative imaging was used in both arms; no intraoperative pathology assessment was permitted.

Results

In total, 596 patients were enrolled. False-negative rates were 24.8 and 66.1 % and false-positive rates were 53.6 and 16.6 % in the device and control arms, respectively. All positive margins on positive main specimens were resected in 62 % (101 of 163) of cases in the device arm, versus 22 % (33 of 147) in the control arm (p < 0.001). A total of 19.8 % (59 of 298) of patients in the device arm underwent a reexcision procedure compared with 25.8 % (77 of 298) in the control arm (6 % absolute, 23 % relative reduction). The difference in tissue volume removed was not significant.

Conclusions

Adjunctive use of the MarginProbe device during breast-conserving surgery improved surgeons’ ability to identify and resect positive lumpectomy margins in the absence of intraoperative pathology assessment, reducing the number of patients requiring reexcision. MarginProbe may aid performance of breast-conserving surgery by reducing the burden of reexcision procedures for patients and the health care system.

BRAF mutation is associated with distinct clinicopathological characteristics in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

Colorectal cancer is a heterogeneous disease with multiple underlying genetic mutations resulting in different phenotypes. Mutation in the v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) proto-oncogene is an important event in the methylator pathway. There is no consensus, however, on the clinicopathological characteristics associated with BRAF mutation.

METHOD

A comprehensive search for published studies examining the effect of BRAF mutation on colorectal cancer was performed. Random effects methods were used to combine data.

RESULTS

Data were retrieved from 21 studies describing 9885 patients. BRAF associated colorectal cancer is associated with proximal tumour location (OR 5.222, 95% CI 3.801-7.174, P < 0.001), T4 tumours (OR 1.761, 95% CI 1.164-2.663, P = 0.007) and poor differentiation (OR 3.816, 95% CI 2.714-5.365, P < 0.001) and is negatively associated with male sex (OR 0.623, 95% CI 0.505-0.769, P < 0.001), age of diagnosis under 60 years (OR 0.453, 95% CI 0.280-0.733, P = 0.001) and rectal cancer (OR 0.266, 95% CI 0.122-0.422, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

BRAF mutation appears to be associated with distinct, unfavourable clinicopathological characteristics in colorectal cancer.

Use of monoclonal antibody-IRDye800CW bioconjugates in the resection of breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Complete surgical resection of breast cancer is a powerful determinant of patient outcome, and failure to achieve negative margins results in reoperation in between 30% and 60% of patients. We hypothesize that repurposing Food and Drug Administration-approved antibodies as tumor-targeting diagnostic molecules can function as optical contrast agents to identify the boundaries of malignant tissue intraoperatively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The monoclonal antibodies bevacizumab, cetuximab, panitumumab, trastuzumab, and tocilizumab were covalently linked to a near-infrared fluorescence probe (IRDye800CW) and in vitro binding assays were performed to confirm ligand-specific binding. Nude mice bearing human breast cancer flank tumors were intravenously injected with the antibody-IRDye800 bioconjugates and imaged over time. Tumor resections were performed using the SPY and Pearl Impulse systems, and the presence or absence of tumor was confirmed by conventional and fluorescence histology.

RESULTS

Tumor was distinguishable from normal tissue using both SPY and Pearl systems, with both platforms being able to detect tumor as small as 0.5 mg. Serial surgical resections demonstrated that real-time fluorescence can differentiate subclinical segments of disease. Pathologic examination of samples by conventional and optical histology using the Odyssey scanner confirmed that the bioconjugates were specific for tumor cells and allowed accurate differentiation of malignant areas from normal tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

Human breast cancer tumors can be imaged in vivo with multiple optical imaging platforms using near-infrared fluorescently labeled antibodies. These data support additional preclinical investigations for improving the surgical resection of malignancies with the goal of eventual clinical translation.

Is DCIS breast cancer, and how do I treat it?

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a pre-invasive stage of breast cancer with a heterogeneous clinical behaviour. Since the introduction of mammographic screening programmes, the incidence of DCIS has shown a dramatic increase. Treatment should focus on the prevention of progression to invasive disease. If progression occurs, poorly differentiated DCIS frequently gives rise to grade III invasive breast cancer, whereas well differentiated DCIS more often recurs as grade I invasive disease. However, at present, validated diagnostic test are lacking to predict progression accurately. The majority of women with DCIS are suitable for breast conserving therapy. Obtaining clear surgical margins is the most important goal of a local excision. Radiotherapy is effective in reducing the risk of local recurrence with about 50 % in all subgroups of patients with DCIS. (Breast cancer specific) survival of women with DCIS is excellent, and radiotherapy does not further improve this. Future research should be directed in enabling to select women who have a high risk of--invasive--recurrence, so in which radiotherapy should be standard part of the breast conserving approach, and those women with a more indolent lesion, in which after surgery a watchful waiting approach can be followed.

DNA methylation in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-obligate precursor lesion of invasive carcinoma of the breast. Current prognostic markers based on histopathological examination are unable to accurately predict which DCIS cases will progress to invasive carcinoma or recur after surgical excision. Epigenetic changes have been shown to be a significant driver of tumorigenesis, and DNA methylation of specific gene promoters provides predictive and prognostic markers in many types of cancer, including invasive breast cancer. In general, the spectrum of genes that are methylated in DCIS strongly resembles that seen in invasive ductal carcinoma. The identification of specific prognostic markers in DCIS remains elusive and awaits additional work investigating a large panel of methylatable genes by using sensitive and reproducible technologies. This review critically appraises the role of methylation in DCIS and its use as a biomarker.

Optimizing clinical management of surgical margins in breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer

There has been, and continues to be, significant controversy over the definition of an "optimal" surgical margin in breast-conserving therapy (BCT). The historic basis of this controversy stems from the original trials documenting the safety of BCT and many conflicting retrospective studies that have sought to define the association between surgical margin width and outcomes over the last 20 years. It is important to understand that margin assessment is an inexact science, and current laboratory approaches to surgical-margin assessment represent only a sampling of the surgical margin. Currently available evidence suggests that decisions regarding surgical margins in BCT should be made in the context of what is known about the biology of breast cancer, as well the interactions of tumor biology, adjuvant treatment for breast cancer, and outcomes. Achieving consensus on management of surgical margins in BCT should be a clinical priority as it offers the opportunity to reduce the burden of breast cancer treatment on patients without compromising cancer-related outcomes.

Ductal carcinoma in situ: how should we treat it?

SUMMARY The observed incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has increased because of the increasing use of sensitive imaging modalities. While the clinical course of DCIS is quite variable, it is considered a precursor lesion to invasive breast cancer. The current focus of DCIS treatment is on the prevention of progression to invasive disease. However, at present, validated diagnostic tests to predict progression accurately are lacking. Additionally, important clinical questions arise during DCIS management. For example, optimal margins of excision or axillary lymph node sampling have not been addressed in randomized clinical trials. May whole-breast radiation after lumpectomy be omitted in selected patients? What is the role of adjuvant tamoxifen if it does not impact overall survival rates? This review aims to describe the natural history of DCIS and highlights the current therapeutic options and challenges in patient management.

The effect of NOD2 polymorphism on postsurgical recurrence in Crohn's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of available literature

BACKGROUND

Up to 70% of patients requiring surgery for Crohn's disease (CD) develop recurrence within 10 years. Unequivocal markers predicting recurrence are needed to tailor postoperative therapy appropriately. NOD2 (nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 2) polymorphisms increase the risk of developing CD; however, their ability to predict recurrence is uncertain. This study aims to determine the association between NOD2 variants and surgical recurrence after initial disease-modifying surgery.

METHODS

A comprehensive search for published series comparing the effect of NOD2 polymorphisms on postoperative surgical recurrence in patients with CD was performed. Random-effects methods were used to combine data.

RESULTS

Six cohort studies comprising 1003 patients with CD were included. A total of 340 patients (33.9%) expressed at least 1 of the 3 common NOD2 polymorphisms. The 1003 patients underwent surgical resection with 335 (33%) developing surgical recurrence. Of 340 NOD2-expressing patients, 130 (39%) required further resection, whereas 202 of 663 patients (30.5%) without the variant underwent repeat resection. NOD2 was not significantly associated with surgical recurrence (odds ratio: 1.58, 95% confidence interval: 0.97-2.57, P = 0.064), most likely because of study heterogeneity (Cochran Q: 12.36, P = 0.030, I: 59.6%). The sensitivity of any mutation in predicting disease recurrence was 39.7% and specificity was 69%, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve being 0.64.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CD with a NOD2 polymorphism do not have an increased risk of surgical recurrence compared with patients without the variant. These data provide insufficient evidence to support postoperative medical prophylaxis based solely on the presence of NOD2 polymorphism.

Infliximab versus cyclosporine as rescue therapy in acute severe steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Acute severe colitis affects 25 % of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Up to 30-40 % of these patients are resistant to intensive steroid therapy and therefore require rescue therapy to prevent emergent colectomy. Data comparing rescue therapy using infliximab and cyclosporine are limited and equivocal. This study evaluates the outcomes of UC patients receiving infliximab or cyclosporine as rescue therapy in acute severe steroid-refractory exacerbations.

METHODS

Electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane database) were searched for studies directly comparing infliximab and cyclosporine in UC, and references of included studies were screened. Two independent reviewers identified relevant studies and extracted data. Meta-analyses were performed using the random effect model. Outcome measures included 3- and 12-month colectomy rates, adverse drug reactions, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Six retrospective cohort studies describing 321 patients met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis did not show significant differences between infliximab and cyclosporine in the 3-month colectomy rate (odds ratio (OR) = 0.86, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 0.31-2.41, p = 0.775), in the 12-month colectomy rate (OR = 0.60, 95 % CI = 0.19-1.89, p = 0.381), in adverse drug reactions (OR = 0.76, 95 % CI = 0.34-1.70, p = 0.508), and in postoperative complications (OR = 1.66, 95 % CI = 0.26-10.50, p = 0.591). Funnel plot revealed no publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Infliximab and cyclosporine are comparable when used as rescue therapy in acute severe steroid-refractory UC. Randomized trials are required to further evaluate these agents.

Size does matter: High volume breast surgeons accept smaller excision margins for wide local excision--a national survey of the surgical management of wide local excision margins in UK breast cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

Optimal margins for wide local excision (WLE) have not been clearly established. Larger margins lead to lower recurrence rates but at the expense of cosmetic appearance. NICE guidelines recommend a 2 mm margin for ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS), whilst the British Association of Surgical Oncology (BASO) recommend units develop local guidelines. There are presently no specific guidelines for invasive cancer. We surveyed members of the Association of Breast Surgeons (ABS) in order to establish current practice nationally. We hypothesised that larger units may accept narrower excision margins to the benefit of better cosmesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A postal questionnaire was sent to all ABS members in October 2010. This consisted of questions about the current practice of the surgeon and their unit. 481 questionnaires were posted in total, all questionnaires returned by April 2011 were analysed.

RESULTS

Questionnaire response rate was 60% (281). Surgeons operating on over 50 cancers per year accepted smaller margins than those operating on less than 50 (p < 0.02). Acceptable adequate anterior and radial margins ranged from 0 to 10 mm for DCIS and 0 to 5 mm for invasive cancer. A variety of approaches to re-excising anterior margins were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey suggests that substantial variations exist in current practice with regard to the approach to WLE. Operator workload appears to influence what is deemed to be an acceptable margin. There is a need for standardised national and international guidelines.

Assessing breast cancer margins ex vivo using aqueous quantum-dot-molecular probes

Positive margins have been a critical issue that hinders the success of breast- conserving surgery. The incidence of positive margins is estimated to range from 20% to as high as 60%. Currently, there is no effective intraoperative method for margin assessment. It would be desirable if there is a rapid and reliable breast cancer margin assessment tool in the operating room so that further surgery can be continued if necessary to reduce re-excision rate. In this study, we seek to develop a sensitive and specific molecular probe to help surgeons assess if the surgical margin is clean. The molecular probe consists of the unique aqueous quantum dots developed in our laboratory conjugated with antibodies specific to breast cancer markers such as Tn-antigen. Excised tumors from tumor-bearing nude mice were used to demonstrate the method. AQD-Tn mAb probe proved to be sensitive and specific to identify cancer area quantitatively without being affected by the heterogeneity of the tissue. The integrity of the surgical specimen was not affected by the AQD treatment. Furthermore, AQD-Tn mAb method could determine margin status within 30 minutes of tumor excision, indicating its potential as an accurate intraoperative margin assessment method.

Outcomes in patients treated with mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ

PURPOSE

To examine, in a large, population-based cohort of women, the risk factors for recurrence after mastectomy for pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and to identify which patients may benefit from postmastectomy radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data were analyzed for 637 subjects with pure DCIS, diagnosed between January 1990 and December 1999, treated initially with mastectomy. Locoregional relapse (LRR), breast cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were described using the Kaplan-Meier method. Reported risk factors for LRR (age, margins, size, Van Nuys Prognostic Index, grade, necrosis, and histologic subtype) were analyzed by univariate (log-rank) and multivariate (Cox modeling) methods.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 12.0 years. Characteristics of the cohort were median age 55 years, 8.6% aged ≤ 40 years, 30.5% tumors >4 cm, 42.5% grade 3 histology, 37.7% multifocal disease, and 4.9% positive margins. At 10 years, LRR was 1.0%, breast cancer-specific survival was 98.0%, and overall survival was 90.3%. All recurrences (n=12) involved ipsilateral chest wall disease, with the majority being invasive disease (11 of 12). None of the 12 patients with recurrence died of breast cancer; all were successfully salvaged (median follow-up of 4.4 years). Ten-year LRR was higher with age ≤ 40 years (7.5% vs 1.5%; P=.003).

CONCLUSION

Mastectomy provides excellent locoregional control for DCIS. Routine use of postmastectomy radiation therapy is not justified. Young age (≤40 years) predicts slightly higher LRR, but possibly owing to the small number of cases with multiple risk factors for relapse, a subgroup with a high risk of LRR (ie, approximately 15%) was not identified.

Computerized decision support system for intraoperative analysis of margin status in breast conservation therapy

Background. Breast conservation therapy (BCT) is the standard treatment for breast cancer; however, 32–63% of procedures have a positive margin leading to secondary procedures. The standard of care to evaluate surgical margins is based on permanent section. Imprint cytology (IC) has been used to evaluate surgical samples but is limited by excessive cauterization thus requiring experienced cytopathologist for interpretation. An automated image screening process has been developed to detect cancerous cells from IC on cauterized margins. Methods. IC was prospectively performed on margins during lumpectomy operations for breast cancer in addition to permanent section on 127 patients. An 8-slide training subset and 8-slide testing subset were culled. H&E IC automated analysis, based on linear discriminant analysis, was compared to manual pathologist interpretation. Results. The most important descriptors, from highest to lowest performance, are nucleus color (23%), cytoplasm color (15%), shape (12%), grey intensity (9%), and local area (5%). There was 100% agreement between automated and manual interpretation of IC slides. Conclusion. Although limited by IC sampling variability, an automated system for accurate IC cancer cell identification system is demonstrated, with high correlation to manual analysis, even in the face of cauterization effects which supplement permanent section analysis.

Evaluation of lumpectomy surgical specimen radiographs in subclinical, in situ and invasive breast cancer, and factors predicting positive margins

PURPOSE

To determine the diagnostic performance of radiological evaluation of the margins of surgical specimens from lumpectomies for subclinical malignant breast lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective study in two French hospitals including all patients who had a non-palpable in situ (ISDC) or invasive (IDC) ductal carcinoma treated by lumpectomy after radiological localisation. For the analysis, the lesions were divided into two groups depending on the majority component in the definitive histological examination: ISDC or IDC. The radiological margin considered was 10mm.

RESULTS

For the 178 lumpectomies studied, the sensitivity of the radiographs of the surgical specimen was 33.3% for ISDC and 50% for IDC. The surgical revision rate was 27.41% for ISDC and 12.64% for IDC. The significant predictive factors for positive margins were the radiological size of the lesions (>10mm) for ISDC (P=0.02) and radiologically positive margins for IDC (P=0.01). Correlation was found between the histological and radiological sizes of the lesion for IDC, but not for ISDC.

CONCLUSION

Radiological examination of surgical specimens does not provide a satisfactory evaluation of the histological margins, in particular for ISDC, even with a radiological threshold of 10mm.

Impact of margin status on local recurrence after mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ

PURPOSE

To examine the rate of local recurrence according to the margin status for patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) treated by mastectomy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

One hundred forty-five consecutive women who underwent mastectomy with or without radiation therapy for DCIS from 1998 to 2005 were included in this retrospective analysis. Only patients with pure DCIS were eligible; patients with microinvasion were excluded. The primary endpoint was local recurrence, defined as recurrence on the chest wall; regional and distant recurrences were secondary endpoints. Outcomes were analyzed according to margin status (positive, close (≤2 mm), or negative), location of the closest margin (superficial, deep, or both), nuclear grade, necrosis, receptor status, type of mastectomy, and receipt of hormonal therapy.

RESULTS

The primary cohort consisted of 142 patients who did not receive postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). For those patients, the median follow-up time was 7.6 years (range, 0.6-13.0 years). Twenty-one patients (15%) had a positive margin, and 23 patients (16%) had a close (≤2 mm) margin. The deep margin was close in 14 patients and positive in 6 patients. The superficial margin was close in 13 patients and positive in 19 patients. One patient experienced an isolated invasive chest wall recurrence, and 1 patient had simultaneous chest wall, regional nodal, and distant metastases. The crude rates of chest wall recurrence were 2/142 (1.4%) for all patients, 1/21 (4.8%) for those with positive margins, 1/23 (4.3%) for those with close margins, and 0/98 for patients with negative margins. PMRT was given as part of the initial treatment to 3 patients, 1 of whom had an isolated chest wall recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Mastectomy for pure DCIS resulted in a low rate of local or distant recurrences. Even with positive or close mastectomy margins, the rates of chest wall recurrences were so low that PMRT is likely not warranted.

[Radiotherapy for breast cancer: which strategy in 2012?]

Postoperative radiotherapy remains essential in breast cancer in 2012. After conserving surgery, it reduces local recurrence risks from 50 to 70%, both for ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive cancers. This was confirmed in several randomized trials and three meta-analyses. The boost increases local control in invasive cancers, but its role should be better defined in ductal carcinoma in situ. Among the latter, there is no clearly identified subgroup for which radiotherapy could be avoided. Local recurrence risk factors are now well-identified both for ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive cancers, with an inclusion, for the latter, of new molecular subgroups. After mastectomy, radiotherapy reduces local recurrence rates from 60 to 70%, especially among patients with axillary nodal involvement, with, in parallel, a 7 to 9% increased survival rate. In order to reduce the waiting list and to avoid under treatment, especially in the elderly, several hypofractionated radiotherapy schemes have been developed for several years. Three randomized trials confirmed similar results to classical radiotherapy. For ten years, several techniques of partial breast irradiation have been developed, with various doses and treated volumes. The optimal indications should be defined according to the new international guidelines.

Margins! Margins. Margins? How Important Is Margin Status in Breast-Preserving Therapy?

Margin status is surely a prognostic factor in patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy, but its impact is probably overestimated in case of adequate adjuvant radiotherapy. Radiotherapy improves local control after excision of the primary tumor in all subgroups of patients. There is, in contrast, no evidence that a certain margin width or a re-resection improves local control.

Ductal carcinoma in situ: recent advances and future prospects

Introduction. This article reviews current management strategies for DCIS in the context of recent randomised trials, including the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and endocrine treatment. Methods. Literature review facilitated by Medline, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases. Results. DCIS should be managed in the context of a multidisciplinary team. Local control depends upon clear surgical margins (at least 2 mm is generally acceptable). SLNB is not routine, but can be considered in patients undergoing mastectomy (Mx) with risk factors for occult invasion. RT following BCS significantly reduces local recurrence (LR), particularly in those at high-risk. There remains a lack of level-1 evidence supporting omission of adjuvant RT in selected low-risk cases. Large, multi-centric or recurrent lesions should be treated by Mx and immediate reconstruction should be discussed. Adjuvant hormonal treatment may reduce the risk of LR in selected cases with hormone sensitive disease. Conclusion. Further research is required to determine the role of new RT regimes and endocrine therapies. Biological profiling and molecular analysis represent an opportunity to improve our understanding of tumour biology in DCIS to rationalise treatment. Reliable identification of low-risk lesions could allow treatment to be less radical.

Investigational Paradigms in Downscoring and Upscoring DCIS: Surgical Management Review

Counseling patients with DCIS in a rational manner can be extremely difficult when the range of treatment criteria results in diverse and confusing clinical recommendations. Surgeons need tools that quantify measurable prognostic factors to be used in conjunction with clinical experience for the complex decision-making process. Combination of statistically significant tumor recurrence predictors and lesion parameters obtained after initial excision suggests that patients with DCIS can be stratified into specific subsets allowing a scientifically based discussion. The goal is to choose the treatment regimen that will significantly benefit each patient group without subjecting the patients to unnecessary risks. Exploring the effectiveness of complete excision may offer a starting place in a new way of reasoning and conceiving surgical modalities in terms of "downscoring" or "upscoring" patient risk, perhaps changing clinical approach. Reexcison may lower the specific subsets' score and improve local recurrence-free survival also by revealing a larger tumor size, a higher nuclear grade, or an involved margin and so suggesting the best management. It seems, that the key could be identifying significant relapse predictive factors, according to validated risk investigation models, whose value is modifiable by the surgical approach which avails of different diagnostic and therapeutic potentials to be optimal. Certainly DCIS clinical question cannot have a single curative mode due to heterogeneity of pathological lesions and histologic classification.

Radiotherapy after conservative surgery in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a review

Several large prospective and retrospective studies have demonstrated excellent long-term outcomes after breast conservative treatment with radiation in invasive breast cancer. Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by radiotherapy (RT) is an accepted management strategy for patients with DCIS. Adding radiation treatment after conservative surgery enables to reduce, without any significant risks, the rate of local recurrence (LR) by approximately 50% in retrospective and randomized clinical trials. As about 50% of LRs are invasive and have a negative psychological impact, minimizing recurrence is important. Local and local-regional recurrences after initial breast conservation treatment with radiation can be salvaged with high rates of survival and freedom from distant metastases.