101
|
Li X, Kitpanit S, Lee A, Mah D, Sine K, Sherman EJ, Dunn LA, Michel LS, Fetten J, Zakeri K, Yu Y, Chen L, Kang JJ, Gelblum DY, McBride SM, Tsai CJ, Riaz N, Lee NY. Toxicity Profiles and Survival Outcomes Among Patients With Nonmetastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated With Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy vs Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2113205. [PMID: 34143193 PMCID: PMC8214161 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Patients with nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) are primarily treated by radiotherapy with curative intent with or without chemotherapy and often experience substantial treatment-related toxic effects even with modern radiation techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) may improve the toxicity profile; however, there is a paucity of data given the limited availability of IMPT in regions with endemic NPC. OBJECTIVE To compare toxic effects and oncologic outcomes among patients with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic NPC when treated with IMPT vs IMRT with or without chemotherapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective cohort study included 77 patients with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic NPC who received curative-intent radiotherapy with IMPT or IMRT at a tertiary academic cancer center from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019. Forty-eight patients with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive tumors were included in a 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis for survival outcomes. The end of the follow-up period was March 31, 2021. EXPOSURES IMPT vs IMRT with or without chemotherapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The main outcomes were the incidence of acute and chronic treatment-related adverse events (AEs) and oncologic outcomes, including locoregional failure-free survival (LRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS We identified 77 patients (25 [32.5%] women; 52 [67.5%] men; median [interquartile range] age, 48.7 [42.2-60.3] years), among whom 28 (36.4%) were treated with IMPT and 49 (63.6%) were treated with IMRT. Median (interquartile range) follow-up was 30.3 (17.9-41.5) months. On multivariable logistic regression analyses, IMPT was associated with lower likelihood of developing grade 2 or higher acute AEs compared with IMRT (odds ratio [OR], 0.15; 95% CI, 0.03-0.60; P = .01). Only 1 case (3.8%) of a chronic grade 3 or higher AE occurred in the IMPT group compared with 8 cases (16.3%) in the IMRT group (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.01-1.21; P = .15). Propensity score matching generated a balanced cohort of 48 patients (24 IMPT vs 24 IMRT) and found similar PFS in the IMPT and IMRT groups (2-year PFS, 95.7% [95% CI, 87.7%-100%] vs 76.7% [95% CI, 60.7%-97.0%]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.31; 95% CI, 0.07-1.47; P = .14). No locoregional recurrence or death was observed in the IMPT group from the matched cohort. Two-year LRFS was 100% (95% CI, 100%-100%) in the IMPT group and 86.2% (95% CI, 72.8%-100%) in the IMRT group (P = .08). Three-year OS was 100% (95% CI, 100%-100%) in the IMPT group and 94.1% (95% CI, 83.6%-100%) in the IMRT group (P = .42). Smoking history was the only clinical factor significantly associated with both poor LRFS (HR, 63.37; 95% CI, 3.25-1236.13; P = .006) and poor PFS (HR, 6.33; 95% CI, 1.16-34.57; P = .03) on multivariable analyses. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, curative-intent radiotherapy with IMPT for nonmetastatic NPC was associated with significantly reduced acute toxicity burden in comparison with IMRT, with rare late complications and excellent oncologic outcomes, including 100% locoregional control at 2 years. Prospective trials are warranted to direct the optimal patient selection for IMPT as the primary radiotherapy modality for nonmetastatic NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xingzhe Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sarin Kitpanit
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Anna Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Dennis Mah
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, NJ
| | - Kevin Sine
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, NJ
| | - Eric J. Sherman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lara A. Dunn
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Loren S. Michel
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - James Fetten
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yao Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Linda Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jung Julie Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daphna Y. Gelblum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sean M. McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Chiaojung J. Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nadeem Riaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nancy Y. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
102
|
Impact of FDG-PET/CT on restaging and response evaluation of locally advanced head and neck cancer patient management. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2021. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396921000200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background:
Head and neck cancer (HNC) accounts for 5% of all new cancer cases and most were locally advanced. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in radiotherapy practice in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is being used in staging and proper contouring. Proper staging is essential for accurate treatment decision.
Methods:
This is a prospective phase II study conducted as a single institute centre to evaluate the role of PET/CT-treatment in staging, contouring and response evaluation of 30 patients with locally advanced HNSCC in contrast to CT scan. Our cases did not undergo radical surgery for the primary tumour, and biopsy was taken with PET/CT post-treatment to evaluate response.
Results:
Median age of patients was 49·4 years (minimum age of 32 years and maximum of 68 years). Males were predominant 22 (73·3%). Nasopharynx was the predominant site 16/30 (53·3%). PET/CT changed the overall staging in 40% of the patients (upstaged in 36·7% and downstaged in 3·3%). Gross tumour volume (GTV) of PET/CT was smaller in 23 patients (76·7%) and larger in 5 (16·7%) than the GTV of conventional CT, whereas GTV of lymph nodes of PET/CT was larger in 20 patients (67·7%) and smaller in 4 (13·3%). PET/CT study detected bone metastasis in two nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients and two cases of 2nd primary tumours which were not detected using conventional CT. The Cox-regression model showed that the median standardised uptake volume (SUV) of the initial tumour had been a dependent predictor of death in patients with HNSCC (p-value = 0·033) where the risk of death was 0·725 times among patients with high SUV of the initial tumour. Consequently, the size of GTV of the tumour was significant in the prediction of death (p = 0·018).
Conclusions:
18F-FDG-PET/CT is useful for staging, radiotherapy delineation as well as aiding proper decision making, in addition to assessment of treatment response in HNSCC patients.
Collapse
|
103
|
Tang Y, He X. Long non-coding RNAs in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: biological functions and clinical applications. Mol Cell Biochem 2021; 476:3537-3550. [PMID: 33999333 DOI: 10.1007/s11010-021-04176-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is one of the most common head and neck malignancies. It has obvious ethnic and regional specificity. Long non-coding RNAs (LncRNAs) are a class of non-protein coding RNA molecules. Emerging research shows that lncRNAs play a key role in tumor development, prognosis, and treatment. With the deepening of sequence analysis, a large number of functional LncRNAs have been found in NPC, which interact with coding genes, miRNAs, and proteins to form a complex regulatory network. However, the specific role and mechanism of abnormally expressed lncRNAs in the pathogenesis of NPC is not fully understood. This article briefly introduced the concept, classification, and functional mechanism of lncRNAs and reviewed their biological functions and their clinical applications in NPC. Specifically, we described lncRNAs related to the occurrence, growth, invasion, metastasis, angiogenesis, and cancer stem cells of NPC; discussed lncRNAs related to Epstein-Barr virus infection; and summarized the role of lncRNAs in NPC treatment resistance. We have also sorted out lncRNAs related to Chinese medicine treatment. We believe that with the deepening of lncRNAs research, tumor-specific lncRNAs may become a new target for the treatment and a biomarker for predicting prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yao Tang
- Hunan Province Key Laboratory of Tumor Cellular & Molecular Pathology (2016TP1015), Cancer Research Institute, Hengyang Medical College of University of South China, Hengyang, 421001, Hunan Province, China
| | - Xiusheng He
- Hunan Province Key Laboratory of Tumor Cellular & Molecular Pathology (2016TP1015), Cancer Research Institute, Hengyang Medical College of University of South China, Hengyang, 421001, Hunan Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
104
|
Goshtasbi K, Abiri A, Lehrich BM, Haidar YM, Tjoa T, Kuan EC. The influence of facility volume on patient treatments and survival outcomes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Head Neck 2021; 43:2755-2763. [PMID: 33998094 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study evaluates the influence of facility case-volume on nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treatments and overall survival (OS). METHODS The 2004-2015 National Cancer Database was queried for patients with NPC receiving definitive treatment. RESULTS A total of 8260 patients (5-year OS: 63.4%) were included. The 1114 unique facilities were categorized into 854 low-volume (treating 1-8 patients), 200 intermediate-volume (treating 9-23 patients), and 60 high-volume (treating 24-187 patients) facilities. Kaplan-Meier log-rank analysis demonstrated significantly improved OS with high-volume facilities (p < 0.001). On cox proportional-hazard multivariate regression after adjusting for age, sex, income, insurance, comorbidity index, histology, AJCC clinical stage, and treatment type, high-volume facilities were associated with lower mortality risk than low-volume (HR = 0.865, p = 0.019) and intermediate-volume facilities (HR = 0.916, p = 0.004). Propensity score matching analysis confirmed this association (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Higher facility volume was an independent predictor of improved OS in NPC, suggesting a possible survival benefit of referrals to high-volume medical centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khodayar Goshtasbi
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Arash Abiri
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Brandon M Lehrich
- Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Yarah M Haidar
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Tjoson Tjoa
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Edward C Kuan
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
105
|
Yeh SA, Hwang TZ, Wang CC, Yang CC, Lien CF, Wang CC, Hsu TY, Hsu RF, Shih YC, Huang YC, Hsieh MC, Gau JS, Chang L, Lee TF. Outcomes of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2021; 62:438-447. [PMID: 33783535 PMCID: PMC8127674 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrab008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Revised: 01/01/2021] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
Nasopharyngeal cancer shows a good response to intensity-modulated radiotherapy. However, there is no clear evidence for the benefits of routine use of image-guided radiotherapy. The purpose of this study was to perform a retrospective investigation of the treatment outcomes, treatment-related complications and prognostic factors for nasopharyngeal cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy and image-guided radiotherapy techniques. Retrospective analysis was performed on 326 consecutive nasopharyngeal cancer patients treated between 2004 and 2015. Potentially significant patient-related and treatment-related variables were analyzed. Radiation-related complications were recorded. The 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates of these patients were 77.9% and 70.5%, respectively. Age, AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) stage, retropharyngeal lymphadenopathy, treatment interruption and body mass index were independent prognostic factors for overall survival. Age, AJCC stage, retropharyngeal lymphadenopathy, image-guided radiotherapy and body mass index were independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival. In conclusion, intensity-modulated radiotherapy significantly improves the treatment outcomes of nasopharyngeal cancer. With the aid of image-guided radiotherapy, the advantage of intensity-modulated radiotherapy might be further amplified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tzer-Zen Hwang
- School of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
- Department of Otolaryngology, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Chun Wang
- School of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
- Department of Otolaryngology, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Chuen-Chien Yang
- Department of Otolaryngology, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Feng Lien
- School of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
- Department of Otolaryngology, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Chung Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Tun-Yen Hsu
- Department of Otolaryngology, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Ruey-Feng Hsu
- Department of Otolaryngology, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Chen Shih
- Department of Otolaryngology, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Yaw-Chang Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Meng-Che Hsieh
- Department of Medical Oncology, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Jhy-Shyan Gau
- Department of Radiology, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Liyun Chang
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Tsair-Fwu Lee
- Department of Electronic Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
106
|
Sasaki M, Nakaguchi Y, Kamomae T, Kajino A, Ikushima H. Impact of treatment planning quality assurance software on volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans for prostate cancer patients. Med Dosim 2021; 46:e1-e6. [PMID: 33972163 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2021.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2021] [Revised: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Software that evaluates the quality of treatment plans (PlanIQTM) has become commercially available in recent years. It includes a feasibility assessment tool that provides the ideal dose volume histogram (DVH) for each organ at risk, based on the ideal dose falloff from the prescribed dose at the target boundary. It is important to investigate whether the PlanIQTM assessment tool (Feasibility DVHTM) can assist treatment planners who have limited to no experience in treatment planning. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate this tool's usefulness for improving the quality of treatment plans. MATERIALS & METHODS This study included 5 patients with prostate cancer. The treatment planners were 2 graduate students, 2 undergraduate students, and one clinical planner. All students were radiological technology and medical physics students with no clinical experience. Two different volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were developed before and after Feasibility DVHTM. The quality of each treatment plan was evaluated based on a scoring system implemented in PlanIQTM. RESULTS Of 5 patients included, 4 received improved treatment plans when Feasibility DVHTM was used. Moreover, 4 of 5 treatment planners showed improvement in treatment planning using Feasibility DVHTM. CONCLUSIONS The findings suggest that using the Feasibility DVHTM tool may improve treatment plans for different planners and patients. However, planners at any level of experience should be trained to check the dose distribution in addition to checking the DVH, which depends on the adequacy of the contours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Motoharu Sasaki
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Tokushima 770-8503, Japan.
| | | | - Takeshi Kamomae
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi 466-8550, Japan
| | - Akimi Kajino
- School of Health Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima 770-8503, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Ikushima
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Tokushima 770-8503, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
107
|
Abstract
This review summarizes the beginning of radiotherapy, techniques of modern radiation therapy with different types, toxicities induced by radiotherapy and their management. Head and neck radiation therapy is still improving for the better management and control of the cancer and induced radiotherapy toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afnan F. Alfouzan
- From the Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
- Address correspondence and reprint request to: Dr. Afnan Alfouzan, Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. E-mail: ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2535-4641
| |
Collapse
|
108
|
Janmunee N, Peerawong T, Phenwan T, Supanichwatana S, Kongkamol C. Factors Influencing Job Retention and Quality of Life amongst Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2021; 22:1401-1406. [PMID: 34048167 PMCID: PMC8408388 DOI: 10.31557/apjcp.2021.22.5.1401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the quality of life (QoL) amongst Thai nasopharyngeal cancer patients (NCP) and identify associated factors with QoL. Methods: This study was based on secondary data from a cross-sectional study that aimed to develop the Thai version of functional assessment of cancer therapy with nasopharyngeal cancer subscale demographic data, clinical information of participants, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy with Nasopharyngeal cancer subscale (FACT-NP) were utilized. Data were analyzed using Student’s t-test, rank-sum test, variance analysis, and the Kruskal-Wallis test. Multiple linear regression with the stepwise model was used to determine multiple variable analysis. Statistical significance was defined at p-value < 0.05. Results: Two hundred and thirty NCP were included in the study with a mean age of 50.3±12.4 years. According to our findings, 68.3% were male, 81.7% were married or living with a partner, and 86.1% were Buddhism had the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status between 0-2 (95.2 %). The employment status, education level, economic status, ECOG, stage , and disease status significantly influenced patients’ QoL. Patients who had active treatment and received prophylactic percutaneous gastrostomy were also impacted by the FACT-NP score. In the multivariate analysis, employment status, ECOG, and disease status were shown to be significant factors that were associated with their QOL in the final model. Conclusion: Employment status was a socioeconomic factor that led to positive QOL amongst NCP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narumon Janmunee
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Thanarpan Peerawong
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Tharin Phenwan
- School of Medicine, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand.,School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, DD14HJ, United Kingdom
| | - Sojirat Supanichwatana
- Department of Education Foundation, Faculty of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Chanon Kongkamol
- Research Unit of Holistic Health and Safety Management in the Community, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
109
|
Lower neck organs at risk sparing in nasopharyngeal carcinoma using hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy (hybrid-VMAT): a case report. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2021. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396920001156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction:
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a prevalent disease in Southern China. Radiation therapy remains the primary treatment modality for NPC due to its high radiation sensitivity. Conventional volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) can achieve excellent target volume coverage and superior conformal dose distributions while sparing organs at risk (OARs). However, VMAT may also produce substantial volume of low-dose region in the surrounding normal tissue. Our oncology centre has incorporated the concept of anterior cervical field with VMAT in clinical practice of NPC treatment planning. The purpose of this treatment-comparison case study is to demonstrate the lower neck OARs sparing ability of hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy (hybrid-VMAT) over conventional VMAT for NPC.
Methods:
Four patients diagnosed with NPC of different clinical lymph node staging (N staging) were enrolled for this treatment-comparison case study. Planning target volumes and OARs were delineated with reference to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0225/0615. Additional OARs from lower neck region, including thyroid, trachea, cervical spine and pharyngeal constrictor muscles (PCMs), were also delineated. Two treatment techniques, hybrid-VMAT and VMAT, were created for each patient’s dataset.
Results and findings:
Both treatment techniques produced adequate target coverage and reduced radiation dose to the OARs as suggested in RTOG 0225/0615. Hybrid-VMAT plans achieved superior dose reduction in larynx, oesophagus, middle PCM, inferior PCM, cervical spine and trachea comparing with VMAT plans. Hence, the clinical usability and functional outcome of hybrid-VMAT should be further investigated for NPC radiation therapy.
Collapse
|
110
|
Wu S, Li H, Dong A, Tian L, Ruan G, Liu L, Shao Y. Differences in Radiomics Signatures Between Patients with Early and Advanced T-Stage Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Facilitate Prognostication. J Magn Reson Imaging 2021; 54:854-865. [PMID: 33830573 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurately predicting the risk of death, recurrence, and metastasis of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is potentially important for personalized diagnosis and treatment. Survival outcomes of patients vary greatly in distinct stages of NPC. Prognostic models of stratified patients may aid in prognostication. PURPOSE To explore the prognostic performance of MRI-based radiomics signatures in stratified patients with NPC. STUDY TYPE Retrospective. POPULATION Seven hundred and seventy-eight patients with NPC (T1-2 stage: 298, T3-4 stage: 480; training cohort: 525, validation cohort: 253). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE Fast-spin echo (FSE) axial T1-weighted images, FSE axial T2-weighted images, contrast-enhanced FSE axial T1-weighted images at 1.5 T or 3.0 T. ASSESSMENT Radiomics signatures, clinical nomograms, and radiomics nomograms combining the radiomic score (Radscore) and clinical factors for predicting progression-free survival (PFS) were constructed on T1-2 stage patient cohort (A), T3-4 stage patient cohort (B), and the entire dataset (C). STATISTICAL TESTS Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method was applied for radiomics modeling. Harrell's concordance indices (C-index) were employed to evaluate the predictive power of each model. RESULTS Among 4,410 MRI-extracted features, we selected 16, 16, and 14 radiomics features most relevant to PFS for Models A, B, and C, respectively. Only 0, 1, and 4 features were found overlapped between models A/B, A/C, and B/C, respectively. Radiomics signatures constructed on T1-2 stage and T3-4 stage patients yielded C-indices of 0.820 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.763-0.877) and 0.726 (0.687-0.765), respectively, which were larger than those on the entire validation cohort (0.675 [0.637-0.713]). Radiomics nomograms combining Radscore and clinical factors achieved significantly better performance than clinical nomograms (P < 0.05 for all). DATA CONCLUSION The selected radiomics features and prognostic performance of radiomics signatures differed per the type of NPC patients incorporated into the models. Radiomics models based on pre-stratified tumor stages had better prognostic performance than those on unstratified dataset. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4 Technical Efficacy Stage: 5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuangshuang Wu
- School of Physics, State Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials and Technologies, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Haojiang Li
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Annan Dong
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Li Tian
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Guangying Ruan
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Lizhi Liu
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Yuanzhi Shao
- School of Physics, State Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials and Technologies, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
111
|
Lamaj E, Vu E, van Timmeren JE, Leonardi C, Marc L, Pytko I, Guckenberger M, Balermpas P. Cochlea sparing optimized radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:64. [PMID: 33794949 PMCID: PMC8017833 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01796-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is standard of care for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Due to the tumor localization and concomitant platinum-based chemotherapy, hearing impairment is a frequent complication, without defined dose-threshold. In this study, we aimed to achieve the maximum possible cochleae sparing. MATERIALS AND METHODS Treatment plans of 20 patients, treated with CRT (6 IMRT and 14 VMAT) based on the QUANTEC organs-at-risk constraints were investigated. The cochleae were re-delineated independently by two radiation oncologists, whereas target volumes and other organs at risk (OARs) were not changed. The initial plans, aiming to a mean cochlea dose < 45 Gy, were re-optimized with VMAT, using 2-2.5 arcs without compromising the dose coverage of the target volume. Mean cochlea dose, PTV coverage, Homogeneity Index, Conformity Index and dose to other OAR were compared to the reference plans. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to evaluate differences, a p value < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS The re-optimized plans achieved a statistically significant lower dose for both cochleae (median dose for left and right 14.97 Gy and 18.47 Gy vs. 24.09 Gy and 26.05 Gy respectively, p < 0.001) compared to the reference plans, without compromising other plan quality parameters. The median NTCP for tinnitus of the most exposed sites was 11.3% (range 3.52-91.1%) for the original plans, compared to 4.60% (range 1.46-90.1%) for the re-optimized plans (p < 0.001). For hearing loss, the median NTCP of the most exposed sites could be improved from 0.03% (range 0-99.0%) to 0.00% (range 0-98.5%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS A significantly improved cochlea sparing beyond current QUANTEC constraints is feasible without compromising the PTV dose coverage in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with VMAT. As there appears to be no threshold for hearing toxicity after CRT, this should be considered for future treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enkelejda Lamaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), University of Zurich (UZH), Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Erwin Vu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), University of Zurich (UZH), Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Janita E van Timmeren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), University of Zurich (UZH), Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Chiara Leonardi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), University of Zurich (UZH), Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Louise Marc
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), University of Zurich (UZH), Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Izabela Pytko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), University of Zurich (UZH), Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), University of Zurich (UZH), Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), University of Zurich (UZH), Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
112
|
Ng WT, Tsang RKY, Beitler JJ, de Bree R, Coca-Pelaz A, Eisbruch A, Guntinas-Lichius O, Lee AWM, Mäkitie AA, Mendenhall WM, Nuyts S, Rinaldo A, Robbins KT, Rodrigo JP, Silver CE, Simo R, Smee R, Strojan P, Takes RP, Ferlito A. Contemporary management of the neck in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Head Neck 2021; 43:1949-1963. [PMID: 33780074 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Revised: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Up to 85% of the patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma present with regional nodal metastasis. Although excellent nodal control is achieved with radiotherapy, a thorough understanding of the current TNM staging criteria and pattern of nodal spread is essential to optimize target delineation and minimize unnecessary irradiation to adjacent normal tissue. Selective nodal irradiation with sparing of the lower neck and submandibular region according to individual nodal risk is now emerging as the preferred treatment option. There has also been continual refinement in staging classification by incorporating relevant adverse nodal features. As for the uncommon occurrence of recurrent nodal metastasis after radiotherapy, surgery remains the standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wai Tong Ng
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Raymond K Y Tsang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jonathan J Beitler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Department of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Remco de Bree
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Andrés Coca-Pelaz
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias-University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias, IUOPA, CIBERONC, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Avraham Eisbruch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | | | - Anne W M Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.,Clinical Oncology Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Antti A Mäkitie
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, HUS Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Research Program in Systems Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Division of Ear, Nose and Throat Diseases, Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - William M Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Sandra Nuyts
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Alessandra Rinaldo
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Udine School of Medicine, Udine, Italy
| | - K Thomas Robbins
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Southern Illinois University Medical School, Springfield, Illinois, USA
| | - Juan P Rodrigo
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias-University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias, IUOPA, CIBERONC, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Carl E Silver
- Department of Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Ricard Simo
- Departement of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Head and Neck and Thyroid Oncology Unit, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Robert Smee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Prince of Wales Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Primož Strojan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Robert P Takes
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Alfio Ferlito
- International Head and Neck Scientific Group, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
113
|
Sasaki M, Nakaguuchi Y, Kamomae T, Tsuzuki A, Kobuchi S, Kuwahara K, Ueda S, Endo Y, Ikushima H. Analysis of prostate intensity- and volumetric-modulated arc radiation therapy planning quality with PlanIQ TM. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:132-142. [PMID: 33768648 PMCID: PMC8035557 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Revised: 02/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess the quality of treatment planning using the PlanIQTM software and to investigate whether it is possible to improve the quality of treatment planning using the “Feasibility dose‐volume histogram (DVH)TM” implemented in the PlanIQTM software. Methods Using the PlanIQTM software, we retrospectively analyzed the learning curve regarding the quality of the treatment plans for 148 patients of prostate intensity‐modulated radiation therapy and volumetric‐modulated radiation therapy performed at our institution over the past eight years. We also sought to examine the possibility of improving treatment planning quality by re‐planning in 47 patients where the quality of the target dose and the dose limits for organs at risk (OARs) were inadequate. The re‐planning treatment plans referred to the Feasibility DVHTM implemented in the PlanIQTM software and modified the treatment planning system based on the target dose and OAR constraints. Results Analysis of the learning curve of the treatment plans quality using PlanIQTM software retrospectively showed a trend of improvement in the treatment plan quality from year to year. The improvement in the treatment plans quality was more influenced by dose reduction in the OARs than by target coverage. In all cases where re‐planning was performed, the improvement in the treatment plan's quality resulted in a better treatment plan than the one adopted for delivery to patients in the clinical plan. Conclusions The PlanIQTM provided insights into the quality of the treatment plans at our institution and identified problems and areas for improvement in the treatment plans, allowing for the development of appropriate treatment plans for specific patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Motoharu Sasaki
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | | | - Takeshi Kamomae
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Akira Tsuzuki
- Department of Radiological Technology, Kochi University Hospital, Kochi, Japan
| | - Satoshi Kobuchi
- Graduate School of Health Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Kenmei Kuwahara
- Graduate School of Health Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Shoji Ueda
- School of Health Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Yuto Endo
- School of Health Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Ikushima
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
114
|
Paudyal R, Chen L, Oh JH, Zakeri K, Hatzoglou V, Tsai CJ, Lee N, Shukla-Dave A. Nongaussian Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion Weighted and Fast Exchange Regime Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced-MRI of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Preliminary Study for Predicting Locoregional Failure. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:1128. [PMID: 33800762 PMCID: PMC7961986 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13051128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Revised: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to identify whether the quantitative metrics from pre-treatment (TX) non-Gaussian intravoxel incoherent motion (NGIVIM) diffusion weighted (DW-) and fast exchange regime (FXR) dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI can predict patients with locoregional failure (LRF) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Twenty-nine NPC patients underwent pre-TX DW- and DCE-MRI on a 3T MR scanner. DW imaging data from primary tumors were fitted to monoexponential (ADC) and NGIVIM (D, D*, f, and K) models. The metrics Ktrans, ve, and τi were estimated using the FXR model. Cumulative incidence (CI) analysis and Fine-Gray (FG) modeling were performed considering death as a competing risk. Mean ve values were significantly different between patients with and without LRF (p = 0.03). Mean f values showed a trend towards the difference between the groups (p = 0.08). Histograms exhibited inter primary tumor heterogeneity. The CI curves showed significant differences for the dichotomized cutoff value of ADC ≤ 0.68 × 10-3 (mm2/s), D ≤ 0.74 × 10-3 (mm2/s), and f ≤ 0.18 (p < 0.05). τi ≤ 0.89 (s) cutoff value showed borderline significance (p = 0.098). FG's modeling showed a significant difference for the K cutoff value of ≤0.86 (p = 0.034). Results suggest that the role of pre-TX NGIVIM DW- and FXR DCE-MRI-derived metrics for predicting LRF in NPC than alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramesh Paudyal
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (R.P.); (J.H.O.)
| | - Linda Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (L.C.); (K.Z.); (C.J.T.); (N.L.)
| | - Jung Hun Oh
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (R.P.); (J.H.O.)
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (L.C.); (K.Z.); (C.J.T.); (N.L.)
| | - Vaios Hatzoglou
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - C. Jillian Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (L.C.); (K.Z.); (C.J.T.); (N.L.)
| | - Nancy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (L.C.); (K.Z.); (C.J.T.); (N.L.)
| | - Amita Shukla-Dave
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (R.P.); (J.H.O.)
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
115
|
Sun Z, Wang J, Huang R, Wang X, Chen C, Deng M, Zhao C, Wang H, Han F. Contralateral Lower Neck Sparing Radiotherapy in Stage N1 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Long-Term Survival Outcomes and Late Toxicities. Front Oncol 2021; 11:628919. [PMID: 33718204 PMCID: PMC7947858 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.628919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To explore the feasibility of contralateral lower neck sparing radiotherapy for patients with stage N1 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) by analyzing long-term survival outcomes and late toxicities. Methods Data of patients with stage N1 NPC who were treated with contralateral lower neck sparing radiotherapy between January 2013 and December 2015 were analyzed. These patients were all staged by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and all received irradiation to the upper neck (levels II, III, and Va) bilaterally along with ipsilateral levels IV and Vb, without irradiation of the contralateral lower neck. Treatment outcomes, regional failure patterns, and late toxicities were examined. Results A total of 275 eligible patients with stage N1 NPC were included in the present study. The median follow-up period was 62 months (range, 3-93 months). The 5-year overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 90.5, 91.3, 94.7, 95.3, 91.2, and 81.7%, respectively. A total of 13 patients (4.7%) developed regional recurrence, all of which occurred in the field and not out of the field. Among 254 patients with available data on late toxicities, the most common late toxicity was xerostomia. No late injuries occurred in the carotid arteries, brachial plexus, or spinal cord. In addition to one case (0.4%) of neck fibrosis and three cases (1.2%) of hearing loss, there were no other grade 3-4 late toxicities observed. Conclusions Contralateral lower neck sparing radiotherapy would be safe and feasible for patients with stage N1 NPC, with the potential to improve the long-term quality of life of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhuang Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jingyun Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Runda Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaohui Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chunyan Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Meiling Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chong Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hanyu Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fei Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
116
|
Zhang T, Xu M, Mi J, Yang H, Liu Z, Huang L, Hu K, Wang R. Loosening Neuro-Optic Structures Dosimetric Constraints Provides High 5-Year Local Recurrence-Free Survival With Acceptable Toxicity in T4 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients Treated With Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2021; 11:598320. [PMID: 33692949 PMCID: PMC7937960 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.598320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Whether the original dosimetric constraints of neuro-optic structures (NOS) are appropriate for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) remains controversial. The present study compared the survival rates and radiation-induced optic neuropathy (RION) occurrence between T4 NPC patients whose NOS were irradiated with a near maximum dose received by 2% of the volume (D2%) >55 Gy and ≤55 Gy. Moreover, the NOS dosimetric parameters and their correlation with RION occurrence were also evaluated. Methods In this retrospective study, 256 T4 NPC patients treated with IMRT between May 2009 and December 2013 were included. Patient characteristics, survival rates, dosimetric parameters, and RION incidence were compared between the D2% ≤55 Gy and D2% >55 Gy groups. Results The median follow-up durations were 87 and 83 months for patients in the D2% >55 Gy and D2% ≤55 Gy groups, respectively. The 5-year local recurrence-free survival rates were 92.0 and 84.0% in the D2% >55 Gy and D2% ≤55 Gy groups (P = 0.043), respectively. There was no significant difference in the 5-year overall survival (OS) between both groups (D2% >55 Gy, 81.6%; D2% ≤55 Gy, 79.4%; P = 0.586). No patients developed severe RION (Grades 3–5), and there was no significant difference (P = 0.958) in the incidence of RION between the two groups. The maximum dose of NOS significantly affected the RION incidence, with a cutoff point of 70.77 Gy. Conclusion Appropriately loosening NOS dosimetric constraints in order to ensure a more sufficient dose to the target volume can provide a better 5-year local recurrence-free survival and acceptable neuro-optic toxicity in T4 NPC patients undergoing IMRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingting Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Meng Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Jinglin Mi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Hui Yang
- Department of Oncology, Liuzhou Worker Hospital, Liuzhou, China
| | - Zhengchun Liu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, China
| | - Lulu Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Kai Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Rensheng Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| |
Collapse
|
117
|
Split-field versus extended-field step-and-shoot IMRT techniques in nasopharyngeal cancer: a report of acute and late toxicities. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2021. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396920000874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
AbstractAim:This study aimed to evaluate acute and late toxicities in nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patients who were treated between split-field (SF) and extended-field (EF) step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques.Materials and methods:Between January 2011 and October 2011, 21 NPC patients with stage I-IVB (7th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging) were randomly assigned to undergo radiotherapy with SF or EF step-and-shoot IMRT technique.Results:At a median follow-up time of 60 months (range 3–77), we reported the comparable acute and late toxicities between the two techniques. One patient (9%) in SF-IMRT arm developed grade 3 acute skin toxicity.Findings:Both SF and EF step-and-shoot IMRT techniques for NPC patients did not produce any statistically significant differences in both acute and late toxicities. Although no difference in toxicity was observed, technical problems due to field matching management were the obstacles in utilisation of SF-IMRT in our routine practice.
Collapse
|
118
|
Wen DW, Lin L, Mao YP, Chen CY, Chen FP, Wu CF, Huang XD, Li ZX, Xu SS, Kou J, Yang XL, Ma J, Sun Y, Zhou GQ. Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models for predicting temporal lobe injury after intensity-modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A large registry-based retrospective study from China. Radiother Oncol 2021; 157:99-105. [PMID: 33484752 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Revised: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop predictive models with dosimetric and clinical variables for temporal lobe injury (TLI) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Data of 8194 NPC patients who received IMRT-based treatment were retrospectively reviewed. TLI was diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging. Dosimetric factors were selected by penalized regression and machine learning, with area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) calculated. Cox proportional hazards models containing the most predictive dosimetric factor with/without clinical variables were performed. A nomogram was generated as a visualization of Cox regression for predicting TLI-free survival. RESULTS During median follow-up of 66.8 months (interquartile range [IQR] 54.2-82.2 months), 12.1% of patients (989/8194) developed TLI. Median latency from IMRT to TLI was 36 months (IQR 28-47 months). D0.5cc (dose delivered to 0.5-cm3 temporal-lobe volume) was the most predictive dosimetric factor (AUC: 0.799). Tolerance dose for 5% and 50% probabilities to develop TLI in 5 years were 65.06 Gy (95% confidence interval [CI]: 64.19-65.92) and 89.75 Gy (95% CI: 87.39-92.11), respectively. A nomogram comprising age, T stage, and D0.5cc significantly outperformed the model with only D0.5cc in predicting TLI (C-index: 0.78 vs. 0.737 in train set; 0.775 vs. 0.73 in test set; both P < 0.001). The nomogram-defined high-risk group had worse 5-year TLI-free survival. CONCLUSIONS D0.5cc of 65.06 Gy was the tolerance dose of the temporal lobe. Reducing D0.5cc decreased risk of TLI, especially in older patients with advanced T stage. The nomogram could predict TLI precisely and allow individualized follow-up management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan-Wan Wen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Li Lin
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yan-Ping Mao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Chun-Yan Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Fo-Ping Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Chen-Fei Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Dan Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhi-Xuan Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Si-Si Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jia Kou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Xing-Li Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun Ma
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ying Sun
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Guan-Qun Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
119
|
Zhou X, Liu P, Wang X. Temporal Lobe Necrosis Following Radiotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: New Insight Into the Management. Front Oncol 2021; 10:593487. [PMID: 33552967 PMCID: PMC7859432 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.593487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Cerebral radiation necrosis (CRN) is one of the most prominent sequelae following radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), which might have devastating effects on patients' quality of life (QOL). Advances in histopathology and neuro-radiology have shed light on the management of CRN more comprehensively, yet effective therapeutic interventions are still lacking. CRN was once regarded as progressive and irreversible, however, in the past 20 years, with the application of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), both the incidence and severity of CRN have declined. In addition, newly developed medical agents including bevacizumab-a humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), nerve growth factor (NGF), monosialotetrahexosylganglioside (GM1), etc., have shown great potency in successfully reversing radiation-induced CRN. As temporal lobes are most frequently compromised in NPC patients, this review will summarize the state-of-the-art progress regarding the incidence, pathophysiology, prevention, treatment, and prognosis of temporal lobe necrosis (TLN) after IMRT in NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Peiyao Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaoshen Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
120
|
Wei ZG, Hu XL, He Y, Guan H, Wang JJ, He L, Mu XL, Liu ZR, Li RD, Peng XC. Clinical and survival analysis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with consistently negative Epstein-Barr virus DNA. Head Neck 2021; 43:1465-1475. [PMID: 33421240 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Revised: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess the clinical and survival features of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) with consistently negative Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA level. METHODS Propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to create well-balanced cohorts. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models were performed to conduct survival analysis. RESULTS Four hundred and eighty patients were enrolled. Patients with consistently negative plasma EBV DNA level had a greater chance to present a relatively earlier T and N classification compared with those with positive EBV DNA level (p < .001; p = .015). And patients with consistently negative EBV level were significantly associated with preferable 3-year DFS (95.0% vs. 84.4%, p = .004), DMFS (98.3% vs. 89.4%, p = .009), and OS (100% vs. 97.6%, p = .004). CONCLUSIONS NPC patients with consistently negative EBV DNA level performed an earlier clinical stage and negative EBV DNA level was related to preferable survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi-Gong Wei
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiao-Lin Hu
- Department of Nursing, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yan He
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hui Guan
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jing-Jing Wang
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ling He
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiao-Li Mu
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Zhe-Ran Liu
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Rui-Dan Li
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xing-Chen Peng
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
121
|
Mailhot Vega RB, De La Mata D, Amendola B, Li B, Poitevin A, Sarria G, Sole S, Sher DJ, Hardenbergh P. Cross-Sectional International Survey to Determine the Educational Interests of Spanish-Speaking Latin American Radiation Oncologists. JCO Glob Oncol 2021; 7:29-34. [PMID: 33405959 PMCID: PMC8081543 DOI: 10.1200/go.20.00330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE With the existing oncology disparities in Latin America, physician expertise has been cited as a possible contributor to inferior oncologic outcomes in some cancers. As two-dimensional radiotherapy rapidly evolved to intensity-modulated radiation therapy in Latin America, adequate contouring education is an actionable target to improving physician knowledge and clinical outcomes. Yet, topics of interest to Latin American radiation oncologists are underreported. We assessed Latin American interest in a virtual platform for case discussion and identified the educational topics of most interest to them. MATERIALS AND METHODS A Spanish-language online survey was designed by a team of Latin American educators. The questions assessed professional nationality, desire for an online educational platform for case presentation, career length, and topics of interest. Educational topics included head and neck (H&N), CNS, GI, lung, gynecologic, breast, and pediatric cancers, lymphoma, sarcoma, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), brachytherapy, and medical physics. RESULTS One hundred thirty-three surveys were included for analysis. Overall, 127 respondents (98%) affirmed interest in participating in a virtual platform for case discussion and treatment advances. The most popular educational themes were H&N cancers (24%), SBRT (14%), and CNS cancers (13%). Of countries with > 10 respondents, the most popular educational topic remained H&N cancers for Argentina, Chile, and Mexico, but the most popular topic among Peruvian respondents was CNS cancer (27%). CONCLUSION With international collaboration and a large sample size, we present the first survey results describing Latin American radiation oncology educational interests. Participants were overwhelmingly interested in a virtual platform, and most were specifically interested in H&N cancer education. These results can be used for focused didactic preparation in Latin America. Future efforts should expand on improving representation and outreach among Central American radiation oncologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond B Mailhot Vega
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Dolores De La Mata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ABC Medical Center, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Benjamin Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Adela Poitevin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Medica Sur, Sótano, Mexico
| | - Gustavo Sarria
- Department of Radiotherapy, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas (INEN), Lima, Peru
| | | | - David J Sher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX
| | | |
Collapse
|
122
|
Chen YP, Ismaila N, Chua MLK, Colevas AD, Haddad R, Huang SH, Wee JTS, Whitley AC, Yi JL, Yom SS, Chan ATC, Hu CS, Lang JY, Le QT, Lee AWM, Lee N, Lin JC, Ma B, Morgan TJ, Shah J, Sun Y, Ma J. Chemotherapy in Combination With Radiotherapy for Definitive-Intent Treatment of Stage II-IVA Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: CSCO and ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:840-859. [PMID: 33405943 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.03237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 177] [Impact Index Per Article: 59.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this joint guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and other healthcare providers on definitive-intent chemoradiotherapy for patients with stage II-IVA nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) and ASCO convened an expert panel of radiation oncology, medical oncology, surgery, and advocacy representatives. The literature search included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials published from 1990 through 2020. Outcomes of interest included survival, distant and locoregional disease control, and quality of life. Expert panel members used this evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS The literature search identified 108 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Five overarching clinical questions were addressed, which included subquestions on radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy sequence, and concurrent, induction, and adjuvant chemotherapy options. RECOMMENDATIONS Evidence-based recommendations were developed to address aspects of care related to chemotherapy in combination with RT for the definitive-intent treatment of stage II to IVA NPC.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Pei Chen
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | | | - Melvin L K Chua
- National Cancer Centre Singapore/Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | | | | | - Shao Hui Huang
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joseph T S Wee
- National Cancer Centre Singapore/Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | | | - Jun-Lin Yi
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Sue S Yom
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Anthony T C Chan
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | - Chao-Su Hu
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Jin-Yi Lang
- Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Chengdu, and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Quynh-Thu Le
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Anne W M Lee
- The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, People's Republic of China, and The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | - Nancy Lee
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Brigette Ma
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | | | - Jatin Shah
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ying Sun
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun Ma
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
123
|
Guo Q, Zheng Y, Lin J, Xu Y, Hu C, Zong J, Lu T, Xu H, Chen B, Liang Q, Xiao Y, Pan J, Lin S. Modified reduced-volume intensity-modulated radiation therapy in non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A prospective observation series. Radiother Oncol 2021; 156:251-257. [PMID: 33418007 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.12.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Revised: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Although the efficacy of "reduced-volume intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)" in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) has been confirmed, two issues regarding the necessity of clinical target volume 1(CTV1) delineation and the optimal margin of CTV2 remained undetermined. The current series, utilized de-intensification technique that omitted the contouring of CTV1 and narrowed the margin of CTV2 from 10 mm to 8 mm, namely "modified reduced-volume IMRT" was initiated to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of this renew technique in a prospective series. PATIENTS AND MATERIALS Dosimetric analysis was performed in 40 non-metastatic NPC cases to evaluate whether our modification is feasible. Then this de-intensification technique was applied in non-metastatic NPC patients treated in our attending group since late 2014. Survival outcomes focused on local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and local failure pattern were analyzed. RESULTS Preliminary dosimetric evaluation of "modified reduced-volume IMRT" showed that the 60 Gy isodose curve generated naturally by this technique could well wrap the target area of CTV1. Subsequent observation series, which included a total of 471 patients and had a median follow-up time of 46.2 months(range,3.7-70.8 months), reported that 4-year estimated LRFS, regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) were 96.6%, 97.7%, 87.7% and 92.4%, respectively. All local recurrence lesions occurred within 95% isodose lines and were considered in-field failures. CONCLUSIONS Our de-intensification technique "modified reduced-volume IMRT" was feasible and did not compromise therapeutic efficacy, well-designed multicenter prospective trials are needed for further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiaojuan Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine, Fuzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Systems Biomedicine (Ministry of Education), Shanghai Center for Systems Biomedicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China
| | - Yahan Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jinyong Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yun Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Cairong Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jingfeng Zong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Tianzhu Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital of Nanchang University, China
| | - Hanchuan Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Bijuan Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Qiandong Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Youping Xiao
- Department of Radiology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jianji Pan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine, Fuzhou, China
| | - Shaojun Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
124
|
Lee A, Chow JCH, Lee NY. Treatment Deescalation Strategies for Nasopharyngeal Cancer: A Review. JAMA Oncol 2020; 7:2774310. [PMID: 33355642 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Since the advent of modern radiotherapy techniques and incorporation of systemic chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer, locoregional control has been excellent. However, the rate of treatment-related complications, many of which are irreversible, remains high. New approaches are being explored to determine whether the toxic effects of treatment can be relieved while maintaining disease control. This review presents the current state of deescalation strategies for nasopharyngeal cancer. OBSERVATIONS A review of the literature shows that deescalation approaches can be generally categorized into deescalating systemic therapy vs deescalating radiotherapy. This review discusses studies that have explored sparing chemotherapy in selected patients with stage II cancer as well as altering the chemotherapy scheduling, dosing, and agent from the current standard of care, cisplatin. Deescalating radiotherapy has involved decreasing the dose and the treatment volume. In many cases, these approaches are being guided by measuring Epstein-Barr virus DNA levels, which is a robust biomarker for screening, treatment monitoring, and surveillance. Ongoing work with various imaging modalities, such as fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and dynamic contrast-enhanced or diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences, have shown promise as another biomarker to safely guide practitioners toward deescalation. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Various strategies to deescalate treatment in nasopharyngeal cancer have been explored, and outcomes have remained excellent in most approaches. Patient selection remains key, and long-term outcomes and late complications are still to be determined. Continued investigation with prospective, multi-institutional studies are needed to better elucidate how treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma can best be individualized and deescalated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- now with Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - James C H Chow
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Kowloon, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
125
|
Xin X, Cheng C, Li C, Li J, Wang P, Yin G, Lang J. Comparative Study of Auto Plan and Manual Plan for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy . Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:12439-12445. [PMID: 33293869 PMCID: PMC7719327 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s226495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose and Objective Auto planning might reduce the manual time required for the optimization and could also potentially improve the overall plan quality. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the statistical comparison of automatic (AU) and manually (MA) generated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans. Materials and Methods The study included 105 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients, admitted to our hospital. The patients underwent IMRT treatments. The clinically delivered plans were performed with Eclipse (Version 11.0) using manual optimization. The same plans were optimized successively in PinnacleTM3 (version 9.10) treatment planning system using the auto plan software package module. D95 (dose of 95% volume) and D98 (dose of 98% volume) were calculated for the targets and maximum dose (Dmax) and mean dose (Dmean) for the organ at risks (OARs); moreover, the average doses of each target and OARs for 105 patients were evaluated. Results There is no significant difference in the homogeneity of the target between AU and MA treatment plans, while a significant difference is observed for what is concerning the OARs or most of OARs in 105 patients, OAR doses were significantly reduced in AU plan. For OARs which have no significant difference between AU and MA plans are highlighted, the mean dose of OARs in AU plans was at least not higher than MA plans. Conclusion Nasopharyngeal carcinoma IMRT plans made by an automatic planning tool met the clinical requirements for target prescription dose; moreover, the dose of normal tissues was lower than in MA plans. Clinical physicists' time can be saved and the influence of factors such as the lack of experience in treatment planning can be avoided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Xin
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Chuandong Cheng
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Churong Li
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jie Li
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Pei Wang
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Gang Yin
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
- Correspondence: Gang Yin; Jinyi Lang Department of Radiation Therapy, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, No. 55, The 4th Section of Renmin South Road, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China Email ;
| | - Jinyi Lang
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
126
|
Zhang LL, Xu F, Song D, Huang MY, Huang YS, Deng QL, Li YY, Shao JY. Development of a Nomogram Model for Treatment of Nonmetastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e2029882. [PMID: 33306119 PMCID: PMC7733160 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Because of tumor heterogeneity, overall survival (OS) differs significantly among individuals with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), even among those with the same clinical stage. Relying solely on TNM staging to guide treatment remains imperfect. OBJECTIVES To establish a comprehensive nomogram to estimate individualized OS and to explore stratified treatment regimens for risk subgroups in nonmetastatic NPC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study included 8093 patients diagnosed with NPC at a single center in China from April 2009 to December 2015. The sample was split into a training cohort (5398 participants [66.7%]) and validation cohort (2695 [33.3%]). Data were analyzed in May 2020. EXPOSURES Age, T stage, N stage, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA level, serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, and albumin (ALB) levels. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end point was OS. The nomogram for estimating OS was generated based on multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression. The performance of the nomogram was quantified using Harrell concordance index (C index), the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve, and a calibration curve. OS rates were established using the Kaplan-Meier method, and intersubgroup differences were examined by the log-rank test. RESULTS Among the 8093 participants, 5688 (70.3%) were men, and the median age at diagnosis was 45 years (range, 7-85 years). Six variables (age, T stage, N stage, EBV DNA levels, LDH levels, and ALB levels) were identified through multivariate Cox regression and incorporated into a nomogram to estimate OS. The resulting nomogram showed excellent discriminative ability and significantly outperformed the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control TNM staging system for estimating OS (C index, 0.716 [95% CI, 0.698-0.734] vs 0.643 [95% CI, 0.624-0.661]; P < .001; AUC, 0.717 [95% CI, 0.698-0.737] vs 0.643 [95% CI, 0.623-0.662]; P < .001), and the calibration curves showed satisfactory agreement between the actual and nomogram-estimated OS rates. The validation cohort confirmed the results. Patients were stratified into 4 risk groups based on the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile score values estimated from the nomogram. The 4 nomogram-defined risk groups demonstrated significantly different intergroup OS (3-year OS rates: risk group 1, 1328 of 1345 [98.7%]; risk group 2, 1289 of 1341 [96.1%]; risk group 3, 1222 of 1321 [92.5%]; risk group 4, 1173 of 1391 [84.3%]; P < .001). These risk groups were associated with the efficacy of different treatment regimens. For example, for risk group 4, induction chemotherapy with concurrent chemoradiotherapy was associated with a significantly better OS than concurrent chemoradiotherapy (log-rank P = .008) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy alone (log-rank P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, the proposed nomogram model enabled individualized prognostication of OS and could help to guide risk-adapted treatment for patients with nonmetastatic NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu-Lu Zhang
- Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Fei Xu
- Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Di Song
- Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Meng-Yao Huang
- Sun Yat-Sen University School of Mathematics, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yong-Shi Huang
- Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qi-Ling Deng
- Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yi-Yang Li
- Department of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jian-Yong Shao
- Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
127
|
Zhao Y, Zhou Q, Li N, Shen L, Li Z. Paranasal Sinus Invasion Should Be Classified as T4 Disease in Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients Receiving Radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2020; 10:01465. [PMID: 33240800 PMCID: PMC7677568 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
In this study, we explored the association between paranasal sinus invasion and prognosis in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC, (T3/T4N0–3M0), and we assessed the possibility of considering paranasal sinus invasion a T category in the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. We enrolled 352 NPC patients who received intensity-modulated radiotherapy between 2008 and 2012. Clinical characteristics and follow-up data were collected. The incidence of paranasal sinus invasion was 36.4% (128 of 352 patients). Multivariate cox regression analysis indicated that paranasal sinus invasion and cervical lymphatic metastasis were independent negative prognostic factors for overall survival (OS, P=0.024, P=0.012), progression-free survival (PFS, P=0.007, P=0.007), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS, P=0.001, P=0.000). The gross tumor volume of the nasopharynx was an independent negative prognostic factor for OS (P=0.013). Cox regression analysis indicated that there were no significant differences in OS, PFS, DMFS, or local relapse-free survival (LRFS) between NPC patients with T4 stage disease and those with T3 and paranasal sinus invasion (P>0.05). The updated T + N staging system slightly improved the prediction of LRFS (0.649, 95% CI: 0.553–0.745) in NPC patients compared to the AJCC system (0.640, 95% CI: 0.545–0.736; P=0.023). Paranasal sinus invasion is independently associated with a poor prognosis in NPC patients. Thus, we recommend that the AJCC staging system upgrade paranasal sinus invasion to the T4 classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yajie Zhao
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Qin Zhou
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Na Li
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Liangfang Shen
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Zhanzhan Li
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
128
|
Ho HW, Yang CC, Lin HM, Chen HY, Huang CC, Wang SC, Lin YW. The feasibility and efficacy of new SBRT technique HyperArc for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: noncoplanar cone-based robotic system vs. noncoplanar high-definition MLC based Linac system. Med Dosim 2020; 46:164-170. [PMID: 33208290 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2020.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Revised: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of HyperArc (HA) for recurrent nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) by comparing it with the CyberKnife system (CK). Fifteen patients with recurrent nasopharyngeal cancer who were treated using the noncoplanar cone-based robotic CK system were enrolled. CK was delivered with a median dose of 37.5 Gy in 5 fractions. The delivered CK treatment plans were the sources for the corresponding homogeneous HA (HA-H) and inhomogeneous HA (HA-IH) plans. The HA-H plans were generated to meet the corresponding treatment plan criteria for the CK plans. The HA-IH plans were designed to emulate the corresponding inhomogeneous CK isodose distributions. These three SBRT treatment plans were compared with target coverage, sparing of organs at risk (OARs), and dose distribution metrics. The HA-H and HA-IH plans consistently exhibited CTV and PTV coverage levels similar or better to those of the CK plans but significantly reduced the dose to OARs. Using the HA techniques (both HA-H and HA-IH plans), the mean maximal doses to the spinal cord, brainstem, optic nerves, and optic chiasm were reduced by approximately 60%, compared to the CK plans. The high dose spillage, conformity, and homogeneity indices of the HA-H plans were significantly better than those of the CK plans. The HA-IH plans showed faster dose falloff and similar conformity of the HA-H plans and dose heterogeneity of the CK plans. Here we demonstrated the HA treatment plan system for recurrent NPC is feasible, either homogeneous or inhomogeneous delivery. Excellent sparing of OARs and dosimetric distribution and very efficient delivery make HA an attractive SBRT technique for recurrent NPC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsiu-Wen Ho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City 71004, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Chieh Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City 71004, Taiwan; Department of Pharmacy, Chia-Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Hsiu-Man Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City 71004, Taiwan
| | - Hsiao-Yun Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City 71004, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Chiao Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City 71004, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Chang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City 71004, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Wei Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City 71004, Taiwan; Department of Pharmacy, Chia-Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan; Department of Health and Nutrition, Chia-Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
129
|
Li X, Lee A, Cohen MA, Sherman EJ, Lee NY. Past, present and future of proton therapy for head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol 2020; 110:104879. [PMID: 32650256 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Proton therapy has recently gained substantial momentum worldwide due to improved accessibility to the technology and sustained interests in its advantage of better tissue sparing compared to traditional photon radiation. Proton therapy in head and neck cancer has a unique advantage given the complex anatomy and proximity of targets to vital organs. As head and neck cancer patients are living longer due to epidemiological shifts and advances in treatment options, long-term toxicity from radiation treatment has become a major concern that may be better mitigated by proton therapy. With increased utilization of proton therapy, new proton centers breaking ground, and as excitement about the technology continue to increase, we aim to comprehensively review the evidence of proton therapy in major subsites within the head and neck, hoping to facilitate a greater understanding of the full risks and benefits of proton therapy for head and neck cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xingzhe Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Anna Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Marc A Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Eric J Sherman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
130
|
Li F, Zhao X, Sun R, Ou J, Huang J, Yang N, Xu T, Li J, He X, Li C, Yang M, Zhang Q. EGFR-rich extracellular vesicles derived from highly metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells accelerate tumour metastasis through PI3K/AKT pathway-suppressed ROS. J Extracell Vesicles 2020; 10:e12003. [PMID: 33304472 PMCID: PMC7710133 DOI: 10.1002/jev2.12003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is the most common cancer with high metastatic potential that occurs in the epithelial cells of the nasopharynx. Distant metastases are the primary cause for treatment failure and mortality of NPC patients. However, the underlying mechanism responsible for the initiation of tumour cell dissemination and tumour metastasis in NPC is not well understood. Here, we demonstrated that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) was highly expressed in tumour tissues of NPC patients with distant metastases and was associated with a decrease in reactive oxygen species (ROS). We also revealed that extracellular vesicles (EVs) transfer occurred from highly to poorly metastatic NPC cells, mediating cell-cell communication and enhancing the metastatic potential of poorly metastatic NPC cells. Further experiments indicated that EVs derived from highly metastatic NPC cells induced the up-regulation of EGFR and down-regulation of ROS in low metastatic NPC cells. Mechanistically, EGFR-rich EVs-mediated EGFR overexpression down-regulated intracellular ROS levels through the PI3K/AKT pathway, thus promoting the metastatic potential of poorly metastatic NPC cells. Strikingly, treatment with EVs secreted from highly metastatic NPC cells was significantly associated with rapid NPC progression and shorter survival in xenografted mice. These findings not only improve our understanding of EVs-mediated NPC metastatic mechanism but also have important implications for the detection and treatment of NPC patients accompanied by aberrant EGFR-rich EVs transmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Li
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol School of Life Sciences Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou China
| | - Xin Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol School of Life Sciences Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou China
| | - Rui Sun
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy Guangzhou China
| | - Jinxin Ou
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol School of Life Sciences Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou China
| | - Junyu Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol School of Life Sciences Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou China
| | - Nanyan Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol School of Life Sciences Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou China
| | - Ting Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol School of Life Sciences Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou China
| | - Jingyao Li
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol School of Life Sciences Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou China
| | - Xiner He
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol School of Life Sciences Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou China
| | - Chaoyi Li
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol School of Life Sciences Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou China
| | - Mo Yang
- The Seventh Affiliated Hospital Sun Yat-sen University Shenzhen China.,Lianjiang People's Hospital Lianjiang China
| | - Qing Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol School of Life Sciences Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou China.,Institute of Sun Yat-sen University in Shenzhen Shenzhen China
| |
Collapse
|
131
|
Sun XS, Liang YJ, Chen QY, Guo SS, Liu LT, Sun R, Luo DH, Tang LQ, Mai HQ. Optimizing the Treatment Pattern for De Novo Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients: A Large-Scale Retrospective Cohort Study. Front Oncol 2020; 10:543646. [PMID: 33194602 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.543646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To investigate the optimal treatment pattern in patients with de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods We assessed 502 consecutive and unselected de novo metastatic NPC patients in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC) from November 2006 to October 2016 in our study. All patients were treated with palliative chemotherapy (PCT) and 308 patients received locoregional radiotherapy (LRRT) subsequently. Our primary study endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results The patients treated with LRRT were associated with improved survival on univariate analysis (3-year OS rate 63.7% vs. 31.8%, P < 0.001) and multivariate analysis (HR 0.52, 95%CI 0.40-0.68, P < 0.001). The overall survival benefit of more than 4 PCT cycles was significant in female (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.24-0.86, P = 0.016) and patients with multiple metastatic sites (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.26-0.66, P < 0.001). The application of concurrent chemotherapy (CCT) was not associated with better survival among patients receiving LRRT (HR 1.31, 95% CI 0.92-1.86, P = 0.141). Conclusion LRRT prolonged survival in de novo metastatic NPC. For patients treated with multiple metastatic sites, more than 4 cycles of PCT is necessary. CCT does not improve survival in de novo metastatic NPC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue-Song Sun
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yu-Jing Liang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qiu-Yan Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shan-Shan Guo
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Li-Ting Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rui Sun
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dong-Hua Luo
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lin-Quan Tang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hai-Qiang Mai
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
132
|
Liu T, Sun Q, Qin W, Chen X, Hu Q. Outcome and Optimal Treatment for Esthesioneuroblastoma in the Era of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy: A Single-Center Experience. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:8355-8362. [PMID: 32982429 PMCID: PMC7490047 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s259921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Esthesioneuroblastoma (ENB) is a type of rare malignant neoplasm of the sinonasal cavity. Optimal treatment for ENB is still controversial. A retrospective study was conducted to identify the clinical outcome and optimal treatment for ENB in the era of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Patients and Methods Between December 2006 and August 2018, 37 patients with ENB without distant metastasis who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy (C+RC) or surgery followed by radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (S+R/RC) were retrospectively reviewed at our center. Results The median follow-up period was 63.7 months (range, 13.2-111.5 months). Five-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were similar between treatment arms (P values > 0.05). With a multivariate analysis, a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) of ≤80 was a prognostic factor for poor five-year OS. A KPS of ≤80 and Kadish class C-D tumors were prognostic factors for poor PFS. A KPS of ≤80 was a prognostic factor for poor LRFS. When KPS was ≤80 and tumors were Kadish class C-D, T3-4 and N1 were prognostic factors for poor DMFS. Subgroup analyses also demonstrated that the two treatment arms exhibited similar trends for OS, PFS, LRFS, and DMFS, excluding patients with N1 or Kadish class A-B tumors (P values > 0.05). Conclusion In the era of IMRT, S+R/RC failed to improve the outcomes of patients with ENB. C+RC may be a feasible treatment option for patients with ENB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tongxin Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, People's Republic of China.,Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310022, People's Republic of China.,Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology in Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, People's Republic of China.,Key Laboratory of Head & Neck Cancer Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, People's Republic of China
| | - Quanquan Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, People's Republic of China.,Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310022, People's Republic of China.,Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology in Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, People's Republic of China
| | - Weifeng Qin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, People's Republic of China.,Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310022, People's Republic of China.,Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology in Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, People's Republic of China.,Key Laboratory of Head & Neck Cancer Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaozhong Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, People's Republic of China.,Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310022, People's Republic of China.,Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology in Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, People's Republic of China.,Key Laboratory of Head & Neck Cancer Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, People's Republic of China
| | - Qiaoying Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, People's Republic of China.,Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310022, People's Republic of China.,Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology in Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, People's Republic of China.,Key Laboratory of Head & Neck Cancer Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
133
|
Wang F, Chuner J, Lei W, Fengqin Y, Zhimin Y, Quanquan S, Tongxin L, Zhenfu F, Yangming J. Optimal induction chemotherapeutic regimen followed by concurrent chemotherapy plus intensity-modulated radiotherapy as first-line therapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e22283. [PMID: 32991429 PMCID: PMC7523833 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000022283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
For patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), induction chemotherapy (IC) regimens based on TPF (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil), TP (docetaxel and cisplatin), and GP (gemcitabine and cisplatin) have shown excellent survival outcomes as the first-line therapy; however, no trials comparing the efficacy and safety of TPF, TP, and GP have been reported. We report 2 phase II trials comparing the treatment outcomes and side effects of 3 different IC regimens followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced patients with NPC.A total of 206 locoregionally advanced patients with NPC treated with a combination treatment from January 2012 to January 2014 were enrolled in the 2 studies. The patients received TPF-, TP-, and GP-based IC regimens every 3 weeks, followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy and concurrent therapy with cisplatin every 3 weeks.After a median follow-up duration of 47 months (10-60 months), the 3-year local recurrence-free survival, regional recurrence-free survival, distant metastases-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 96.4%, 100%, 87.7%, 86%, and 94.7% in the TPF arm; 91.7%, 95.9%, 91.9%, 85.2%, and 92% in the TP arm; 98.6%, 100%, 89.0%, 87.6%, and 89.2% in the GP arm. The survival differences among the 3 arms were not statistically significant (P > .05). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that the IC regimen was not an independent prognostic factor for any survival outcomes. The patients in the TP arm experienced significantly lower grade 3/4 toxicities than the patients in the other 2 arms.TP-based IC regimen has similar efficacy compared with TPF- and GP-based IC regimens; however, TP-based IC regimen has a lower toxicity profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fangzheng Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
- Institute of Cancer Research and Basic Medical Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology
| | - Jiang Chuner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Department of Breast Tumor Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang Hangzhou
| | - Wang Lei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
- Institute of Cancer Research and Basic Medical Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology
| | - Yan Fengqin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
- Institute of Cancer Research and Basic Medical Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology
| | - Ye Zhimin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
- Institute of Cancer Research and Basic Medical Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology
| | - Sun Quanquan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
- Institute of Cancer Research and Basic Medical Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology
| | - Liu Tongxin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
- Institute of Cancer Research and Basic Medical Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology
| | - Fu Zhenfu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
- Institute of Cancer Research and Basic Medical Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology
| | - Jiang Yangming
- Department of Digital Earth, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, CAS, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
134
|
Liu WS, Tsai KW, Kang BH, Yang CC, Huang WL, Lee CC, Hu YC, Chang KP, Chen HM, Lin YS. Simultaneous Reduction of Volume and Dose in Clinical Target Volume for Nasopharyngeal Cancer Patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 109:495-504. [PMID: 32971188 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.09.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2020] [Revised: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the treatment outcome and severe late adverse effects (AEs) between conventional volume and dose (CVD) and simultaneously reduced volume and dose (SRVD) of clinical target volume treatments in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS This retrospective cohort study enrolled patients with nonmetastatic stage II to IV nasopharyngeal cancer from a single institute. Survival endpoints and severe (≥grade 3) late AEs and comorbidity were compared between groups. The correlation of severe late AEs, comorbidity, and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods. RESULTS From January 2012 to June 2017, this study enrolled 178 patients, 64 in the CVD group and 114 in the SRVD group. The 2 groups did not differ significantly in patient characteristics except for mean follow-up time (37.6 vs 48.8 months; P = .01). The SRVD group did not significantly differ from the CVD group in local control survival (82.0% vs 78.4%; P = .85), regional control survival (89.9% vs 86.0%; P = .62), or disease-free survival (76.4% vs 66.9%; P = .67). The SRVD group had significantly better OS (93.9% vs 67.0%; P < .001) and salvage survival (79.3% vs 20.7%; P < .01) and a significantly lower ratio of severe lung infection (1 of 113 vs 5 of 59; P = .02). The SRVD group had a significantly lower risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.3; P = .03). The factors associated with a significantly higher risk of mortality were N3 (regional lymph node stage status of N3) (HR, 3.0; P = .02); comorbidities of diabetes, coronary artery disease, or chronic kidney disease (grades 2-3) (HR, 3.8; P = .009), and severe lung infection (HR, 6.3; P = .007). CONCLUSIONS Simultaneously reduced volume and dose of clinical target volumes did not impair locoregional control or disease-free survival. The benefits of SRVD treatment may include significant reduction in severe late AEs, particularly lung infection, dysphagia, and xerostomia. However, additional studies with longer patient follow-up are required to confirm these benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Shan Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Nursing, Meiho University, Pingtung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
| | - Kuo-Wang Tsai
- Department of Medical Education and Research, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Research, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Bor-Hwang Kang
- School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Chieh Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan; Department of Pharmacy, Chia-Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Lun Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Chih Lee
- School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Chang Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Kuo-Ping Chang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hsiu-Min Chen
- Department of Research Center of Medical Informatics, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yaoh-Shiang Lin
- School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
135
|
Zang J, Xu M, Li C, Zhao L, Luo S, Wang J, Shi M. Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus docetaxel and cisplatin as induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma from non-endemic area of China. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2020; 146:2369-2378. [PMID: 32363479 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-020-03229-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although several trials have confirmed the treatment efficacy of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) from endemic area of China, little is known about the best regime for induction chemotherapy in non-endemic region. This study compared the treatment effect of Gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP) versus docetaxel and cisplatin (TP) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced NPC from non-endemic area of China. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 196 locoregionally advanced NPC patients were enrolled in this study, with 142 and 54 patients in TP and GP followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy groups. The primary endpoint was treatment response of induction chemotherapy. The secondary endpoints included disease-free survival. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate the efficacy between treatment groups. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 45.5 months (range: 6-60.5 months). During induction chemotherapy course, GP contributed higher treatment response rate than TP (68.1% vs. 47.1%, p = 0.007). Patients in GP group had better DFS and LRFS than those in TP group (3-year and 5-year DFS, 86.8% and 82.5% vs. 71.7% and 68%, p = 0.036; 3-year and 5-year LRFS, 96.2% and 96.2% vs. 90.5% and 82.8%, p = 0.03). No significant difference of adverse events was observed between two treatment groups in the whole course. CONCLUSION This study suggested that GP followed by CCRT was better than TP followed by CCRT in improving survival outcomes of locoregionally advanced NPC patients from non-endemic area of China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Zang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, XiJing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, No.127, Chang Le West Road, Xi'an, 710032, China
| | - Man Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, XiJing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, No.127, Chang Le West Road, Xi'an, 710032, China
| | - Chen Li
- Department of Health Statistics, Faculty of Preventive Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Lina Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, XiJing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, No.127, Chang Le West Road, Xi'an, 710032, China
| | - Shanuan Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, XiJing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, No.127, Chang Le West Road, Xi'an, 710032, China
| | - Jianhua Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, XiJing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, No.127, Chang Le West Road, Xi'an, 710032, China
| | - Mei Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, XiJing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, No.127, Chang Le West Road, Xi'an, 710032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
136
|
He L, Xiao J, Wei Z, He Y, Wang J, Guan H, Mu X, Peng X. Toxicity and dosimetric analysis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients undergoing radiotherapy with IMRT or VMAT: A regional center's experience. Oral Oncol 2020; 109:104978. [PMID: 32861986 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Revised: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To observe the differences of dosimetric parameters and late toxicities in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC) patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), which may provide the selective basis about radiation technology in clinical practices. METHODS AND MATERIALS Dosimetric parameters and late toxicities were collected and retrospectively analyzed from 627 NPC patients (stage as I-IVA/IVB) between January 2010 and December 2015. RESULTS The median D2 of all targets and D50 of PGTVnd (regional lymph nodes) were lower in VAMT than those in IMRT, while the median D95 and D98 of PGTVnx (primary lesions) were higher in VMAT than those in IMRT (p < 0.05). Superior sparing of the organs at risk were observed in VMAT. The maximum dose of the brainstem, spinal cord, temporal lobes, temporomandibular joint, optic chiasm, and lens were lower in VMAT than those in IMRT, where the median dose reduction ranged from 0.56 to 3.56 Gy (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, the median parotid glands V30 in VMAT was reduced by approximately 2% compared to that in IMRT (p = 0.027). Regarding the late toxicities, ototoxicity, trismus, and temporal lobe injury were reduced by VMAT (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the late toxicities were correlative with the radiation dose of the corresponding OARs (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION For NPC treatment plans, the VMAT might provide not only more favorable dose distributions of targets but also better sparing of normal tissue than observed in IMRT. Furthermore, VMAT possibly provides less treatment-related late toxicities such as ototoxicity, trismus, and temporal lobe injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling He
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
| | - Jianghong Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
| | - Zhigong Wei
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
| | - Yan He
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
| | - Jingjing Wang
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
| | - Hui Guan
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
| | - Xiaoli Mu
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
| | - Xingchen Peng
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China.
| |
Collapse
|
137
|
Huang X, Chen X, Zhao C, Wang J, Wang K, Wang L, Miao J, Cao C, Jin T, Zhang Y, Qu Y, Chen X, Liu Q, Zhang S, Zhang J, Luo J, Xiao J, Xu G, Gao L, Yi J. Adding Concurrent Chemotherapy to Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Does Not Improve Treatment Outcomes for Stage II Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Phase 2 Multicenter Clinical Trial. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1314. [PMID: 32850414 PMCID: PMC7426506 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To explore the efficacy of concomitant chemotherapy in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to treat stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods and Materials: In this randomized phase 2 study [registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01187238)], eligible patients with stage II (2010 UICC/AJCC) NPC were randomly assigned to either IMRT alone (RT group) or IMRT combined with concurrent cisplatin (40 mg/m2, weekly) (CCRT group). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The second endpoints included local failure-free survival (LFFS), regional failure-free survival (RFFS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and acute toxicities. Results: Between May 2010 to July 2012, 84 patients who met the criteria were randomized to the RT group (n = 43) or the CCRT group (n = 41). The median follow-up time was 75 months. The OS, LFFS, RFFS, DFS, and DMFS for the RT group and CCRT group were 100% vs. 94.0% (p = 0.25), 93.0% vs. 89.3% (p = 0.79), 97.7% vs. 95.1% (p = 0.54), 90.4% vs. 86.6% (p = 0.72), and 95.2% vs. 94.5% (p = 0.77), respectively. A total of 14 patients experienced disease failure, 7 patients in each group. The incidence of grade 2 to 4 leukopenia was higher in the CCRT group (p = 0.022). No significant differences in liver, renal, skin, or mucosal toxicity was observed between the two groups. Conclusion: For patients with stage II NPC, concomitant chemotherapy with IMRT did not improve survival or disease control but had a detrimental effect on bone marrow function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaodong Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaozhong Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Province Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Chong Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jingbo Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Kai Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jingjing Miao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Caineng Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Province Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ting Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Province Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ye Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan Qu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xuesong Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Qingfeng Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shiping Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jianghu Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jingwei Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jianping Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Guozhen Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Li Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Junlin Yi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
138
|
Tseng M, Ho F, Leong YH, Wong LC, Tham IW, Cheo T, Lee AW. Emerging radiotherapy technologies and trends in nasopharyngeal cancer. Cancer Commun (Lond) 2020; 40:395-405. [PMID: 32745354 PMCID: PMC7494066 DOI: 10.1002/cac2.12082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Technology has always driven advances in radiotherapy treatment. In this review, we describe the main technological advances in radiotherapy over the past decades for the treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) and highlight some of the pressing issues and challenges that remain. We aim to identify emerging trends in radiation medicine. These include advances in personalized medicine and advanced imaging modalities, standardization of planning and delineation, assessment of treatment response and adaptive re‐planning, impact of particle therapy, and role of artificial intelligence or automation in clinical care. In conclusion, we expect significant improvement in the therapeutic ratio of radiotherapy treatment for NPC over the next decade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Tseng
- Radiation Oncology Centre, Mt Elizabeth Novena Hospital, Singapore, 329563, Singapore
| | - Francis Ho
- Radiation Oncology Centre, Mt Elizabeth Novena Hospital, Singapore, 329563, Singapore
| | - Yiat Horng Leong
- Radiation Oncology Centre, Mt Elizabeth Novena Hospital, Singapore, 329563, Singapore
| | - Lea Choung Wong
- Radiation Oncology Centre, Mt Elizabeth Novena Hospital, Singapore, 329563, Singapore
| | - Ivan Wk Tham
- Radiation Oncology Centre, Mt Elizabeth Novena Hospital, Singapore, 329563, Singapore
| | - Timothy Cheo
- Radiation Oncology Centre, Mt Elizabeth Novena Hospital, Singapore, 329563, Singapore
| | - Anne Wm Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, the University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 999077, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
139
|
Zhou GQ, Wu CF, Deng B, Gao TS, Lv JW, Lin L, Chen FP, Kou J, Zhang ZX, Huang XD, Zheng ZQ, Ma J, Liang JH, Sun Y. An optimal posttreatment surveillance strategy for cancer survivors based on an individualized risk-based approach. Nat Commun 2020; 11:3872. [PMID: 32747627 PMCID: PMC7400511 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-17672-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The optimal post-treatment surveillance strategy that can detect early recurrence of a cancer within limited visits remains unexplored. Here we adopt nasopharyngeal carcinoma as the study model to establish an approach to surveillance that balances the effectiveness of disease detection versus costs. A total of 7,043 newly-diagnosed patients are grouped according to a clinic-molecular risk grouping system. We use a random survival forest model to simulate the monthly probability of disease recurrence, and thereby establish risk-based surveillance arrangements that can maximize the efficacy of recurrence detection per visit. Markov decision-analytic models further validate that the risk-based surveillance outperforms the control strategies and is the most cost-effective. These results are confirmed in an external validation cohort. Finally, we recommend the risk-based surveillance arrangement which requires 10, 11, 13 and 14 visits for group I to IV. Our surveillance strategies might pave the way for individualized and economic surveillance for cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guan-Qun Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 510060, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chen-Fei Wu
- Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, 510060, Guangzhou, China
| | - Bin Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital, Guangzhou, 543002, Guangxi, China
| | - Tian-Sheng Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital, Guangzhou, 543002, Guangxi, China
| | - Jia-Wei Lv
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 510060, Guangzhou, China
| | - Li Lin
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 510060, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fo-Ping Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 510060, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jia Kou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 510060, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhao-Xi Zhang
- Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, 510060, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Dan Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 510060, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zi-Qi Zheng
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 510060, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jun Ma
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 510060, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jin-Hui Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital, Guangzhou, 543002, Guangxi, China.
| | - Ying Sun
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 510060, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
140
|
He JJ, Li Z, Rong ZX, Gao J, Mu Y, Guan YD, Ren XX, Zi YY, Liu LY, Fan Q, Zhou M, Duan YM, Zhou Q, Deng YZ, Sun LQ. m 6A Reader YTHDC2 Promotes Radiotherapy Resistance of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma via Activating IGF1R/AKT/S6 Signaling Axis. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1166. [PMID: 32850334 PMCID: PMC7411471 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification has been reported as a critical regulator of gene transcript expression. Although m6A modification plays important roles in tumor development, its role in therapeutic resistance remains unknown. In this study, we aimed to examine the expression level of m6A-modification related proteins and elucidate the effect of m6A-related proteins on radiation response in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Among the genes that participated in m6A modification, YTHDC2, a m6A reader, was found to be consistently highly expressed in radioresistant NPC cells. Knocking down of YTHDC2 expression in radioresistant NPC cells improved the therapeutic effect of radiotherapy in vitro and in vivo, whereas overexpression of YTHDC2 in radiosensitive NPC cells exerted an opposite effect. Bioinformatics and mechanistic studies revealed that YTHDC2 could physically bound to insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) messenger RNA and promoted translation initiation of IGF1R mRNA, which in turn activated the IGF1R-AKT/S6 signaling pathway. Thus, the present study suggests that YTHDC2 promotes radiotherapy resistance of NPC cells by activating the IGF1R/ATK/S6 signaling axis and may serve as a potential therapeutic target in radiosensitization of NPC cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun-Ju He
- Xiangya Cancer Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Key Laboratory of Molecular Radiation Oncology Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Zhi Li
- Xiangya Cancer Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Key Laboratory of Molecular Radiation Oncology Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Zhuo-Xian Rong
- Xiangya Cancer Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Key Laboratory of Molecular Radiation Oncology Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Jie Gao
- Xiangya Cancer Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Key Laboratory of Molecular Radiation Oncology Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Yun Mu
- Xiangya Cancer Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Key Laboratory of Molecular Radiation Oncology Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Yi-Di Guan
- Xiangya Cancer Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Key Laboratory of Molecular Radiation Oncology Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Xin-Xin Ren
- Xiangya Cancer Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Key Laboratory of Molecular Radiation Oncology Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Yu-Yuan Zi
- Xiangya Cancer Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Key Laboratory of Molecular Radiation Oncology Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Li-Yu Liu
- Xiangya Cancer Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Key Laboratory of Molecular Radiation Oncology Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Qi Fan
- Xiangya Cancer Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Key Laboratory of Molecular Radiation Oncology Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Ming Zhou
- Cancer Research Institute and School of Basic Medical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yu-Mei Duan
- Cancer Research Institute and School of Basic Medical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Qin Zhou
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yue-Zhen Deng
- Xiangya Cancer Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Key Laboratory of Molecular Radiation Oncology Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Lun-Quan Sun
- Xiangya Cancer Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Key Laboratory of Molecular Radiation Oncology Hunan Province, Changsha, China.,Hunan International Science and Technology Collaboration Base of Precision Medicine for Cancer, Changsha, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Gerontology, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
141
|
Netto E, Santos H, Carvalho L, Capelo-Martínez JL, Rito M, Cabeçadas J, Roldão M. Label-free quantitative mass spectrometry from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Preliminary results from a non-endemic European cohort of patients. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2020; 25:746-753. [PMID: 32684864 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2018] [Revised: 04/27/2020] [Accepted: 05/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim Report our results of biomarker discovery in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) via proteomic analysis. Background Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a rare cancer in Western countries. Proteomic analysis have already been reported as a useful tool to provide biomarkers. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples, despite largely underused, can provide invaluable information for biomarker research via proteomic analysis. Methods FFPE samples of NPC were submitted to protein extraction followed by FASP-digestion and label-free quantitative mass spectrometry (MS). Patients' received concurrent chemoradiation with or without adjuvant chemotherapy as per Intergroup 0099 trial. IMRT was delivered following the RTOG0615 specifications. Toxicity was scored using the CTCAE 4.03 tables. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Log-rank was used to detect differences. KEGG ontology graphics were generated. Results 28 FFPE samples from NPC patients were used. Patients were: 79% male, 97% Caucasians, 86% WHO type 3, 40% T1, 10% T2, 25% T3, and 25% T4. With a median follow up of 37 months, local control was 83 (T1, 100% T2, T3 and T4), overall survival was 84%, and six patients developed distant metastases. All five patients that died were due to metastatic disease. Tumor samples contained a median of 75% of tumor material. We found Epstein-Barr (EBV) and Herpes simplex (HSV) viruses' related proteins significantly present in early-stage primary NPC (T1 and T2, p < 0.01). A pool of 10 proteins was statistically up-regulated in the metastatic group of patients (p < 0.01). Median survival from this M1 group was <1 year (p < 0.001). Conclusions FFPE samples yielded adequate material for MS analysis. We found EBV and HSV related proteins on early-stage NPC, and proteomic profiling associated with distant metastases, potential candidates of disease biomarkers. Validation is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo Netto
- Serviço de Radioterapia, Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil, Lisboa, Portugal.,NOVA Medical School, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Hugo Santos
- BIOSCOPE Research Group, LAQV-REQUIMTE, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Campus de Caparica, Portugal.,PROTEOMASS Scientific Society, Madan Parque, Rua dos Inventores, 2825-182 Caparica, Portugal
| | - Luís Carvalho
- BIOSCOPE Research Group, LAQV-REQUIMTE, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Campus de Caparica, Portugal.,PROTEOMASS Scientific Society, Madan Parque, Rua dos Inventores, 2825-182 Caparica, Portugal
| | - José Luis Capelo-Martínez
- BIOSCOPE Research Group, LAQV-REQUIMTE, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Campus de Caparica, Portugal.,PROTEOMASS Scientific Society, Madan Parque, Rua dos Inventores, 2825-182 Caparica, Portugal
| | - Miguel Rito
- Serviço de Anatomia-Patológica, Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - José Cabeçadas
- Serviço de Anatomia-Patológica, Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Margarida Roldão
- Serviço de Radioterapia, Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil, Lisboa, Portugal.,NOVA Medical School, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
142
|
Two-year outcome of concurrent chemoradiation with carboplatin with or without adjuvant carboplatin/fluorouracil in nasopharyngeal cancer: A multicenter randomized trial. Curr Probl Cancer 2020; 45:100620. [PMID: 32713518 DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2020.100620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2020] [Revised: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND According to the noninferiority result of chemoradiation with carboplatin in our previous nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) study along with the inconclusive data on the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), we designed to assess the role of adjuvant carboplatin/fluorouracil following CCRT with carboplatin in locoregionally advanced NPC. MATERIALS AND METHODS A multicenter randomized trial was conducted at 5 cancer centers in Thailand. We enrolled in stage T2N0M0-T4N2M0 (American Joint Cancer Committee 7th edition) WHO Type 2 NPC patients. N3 or metastatic disease patients were excluded. Participants were randomized into 2 groups: CCRT plus AC group vs the CCRT alone group. Patients in both groups received weekly carboplatin 100 mg/m2 for 6 cycles concurrently with radiotherapy 69.96-70 Gy. Patients in the AC group subsequently received 3 cycles of carboplatin area under curve-5 plus 1000 mg/m2/day of fluorouracil infusion within 96 hours every 3 weeks. We report the 2-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), loco-regional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Treatment-related toxicities and compliance were also explored. RESULTS Of 175 patients, 82 (46.9%) were assigned to the AC group, and 93 (53.1%) to the CCRT group. The compliance rate during CCRT was 90% and 86% in the AC and CCRT group, whereas 81.7% during adjuvant treatment in the AC group. With a median follow-up time of 24.4 months (interquartile range 17.9-24.4), the 2-year OS rate was 89.6% in the AC group and 81.8% in the CCRT group (P= 0.167). The 2-year DFS rate was 86.8% in the AC group and 74.6% in the CCRT group (P = 0.042). The 2-year LRFS rate was 91.5% in the AC group and 88.2% in the CCRT group (P = 0.443). The 2-year DMFS rate was 85.4% in the AC group and 79.6% in the CCRT group (P = 0.294). The most frequent serious (grade 3/4) nonhematologic toxicity was acute mucositis, which occurred 5% in the AC group vs 4% in the CCRT group (P = 0.498). For hematologic toxicity, grade 3-4 leukopenia were found 10% and 5% in the adjuvant and CCRT groups, respectively (P = 0.003). Multivariate analyses determined stage N2 disease was an adverse prognostic factor associated with shorter OS, DFS, and DMFS. And the adjuvant treatment was a significant protective factor for only DFS. CONCLUSIONS The addition of adjuvant carboplatin/fluorouracil following CCRT with carboplatin significantly improved 2-year DFS in stage T2N0M0-T4N2M0 NPC albeit there was a nonsignificant trend in favor of a higher 2-year OS, LRFS, and DMFS. Long-term efficacy and late toxicities of AC still require exploration.
Collapse
|
143
|
Miao J, Di M, Chen B, Wang L, Cao Y, Xiao W, Wong KH, Huang L, Zhu M, Huang H, Huang S, Han F, Deng X, Xiang Y, Lv X, Xia W, Tan SH, Wee JTS, Guo X, Chua MLK, Zhao C. A Prospective 10-Year Observational Study of Reduction of Radiation Therapy Clinical Target Volume and Dose in Early-Stage Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 107:672-682. [PMID: 32272183 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.03.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2019] [Revised: 03/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/08/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Current guideline recommends a uniform method of delineation of subclinical disease within the primary clinical target volume (CTVp) for all stages of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We performed a prospective observational study to investigate the outcomes with a reduced CTVp and radiation dose for early-stage NPC. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with newly diagnosed, biopsy-proven World Health Organization type II-III and American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control sixth edition stage T1-2N0-1 disease were enrolled. All patients were treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy alone. We categorized CTVp into CTVp1 (high risk) and CTVp2 (low risk). CTVp1 comprised of gross tumor (on magnetic resonance imaging or contrast-enhanced computed tomography) plus a 5-mm margin (3-mm posteriorly) and was prescribed to 60 Gy in 30 fractions (fr). CTVp2 was generated from CTVp1 plus a 5-mm margin (3 mm posteriorly), excluding the maxillary and cavernous sinuses, and was prescribed to 54 Gy in 30 fr. The prescribed doses to the primary and nodal gross tumor volume (GTVp and GTVn) were 68 Gy in 30 fr and 60 to 66 Gy in 30 fr, respectively. Primary endpoint was local recurrence-free survival. This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03839602. RESULTS From May 2001 to August 2006, 103 patients were recruited and completed IMRT. With a median follow-up of 15.2 years (range, 2.1-18.1 years), only 1 patient had local failure. Ten-year local recurrence-free survival, regional recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival were 90.3%, 88.3%, 90.3%, and 91.2%, respectively. Among late IMRT-related adverse events, we recorded 2 patients with G1 cranial nerve injury, 3 patients with G3 hearing loss, and 3 patients with G3 subcutaneous fibrosis. No patients had temporal lobe necrosis, brain stem injury, or trismus. CONCLUSIONS Decreased CTV margins and radiation doses can achieve long-term tumor control with mild late toxicities for patients with early-stage NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingjing Miao
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Muping Di
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Boyu Chen
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lin Wang
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yanqing Cao
- Department of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Weiwei Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Kah Hie Wong
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Division of Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Luo Huang
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Division of Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Manyi Zhu
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huageng Huang
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shaomin Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fei Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaowu Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yanqun Xiang
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xing Lv
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Weixiong Xia
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Sze Huey Tan
- Division of Clinical Trials and Epidemiological Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Joseph T S Wee
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Division of Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Xiang Guo
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Melvin L K Chua
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Division of Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
| | - Chong Zhao
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
144
|
Kang JJ, Wong RJ, Sherman EJ, Rybkin A, McBride SM, Riaz N, Tsai CJ, Yu Y, Chen L, Zakeri K, Gelblum DY, Gillespie EF, Cohen MA, Cracchiolo JR, Ganly I, Patel S, Singh B, Boyle JO, Roman BR, Morris LG, Shaha AR, Dunn LA, Ho AL, Fetten JV, Shah JP, Pfister DG, Lee NY. The 3 Bs of cancer care amid the COVID-19 pandemic crisis: "Be safe, be smart, be kind"-A multidisciplinary approach increasing the use of radiation and embracing telemedicine for head and neck cancer. Cancer 2020; 126:4092-4104. [PMID: 32639615 PMCID: PMC7361524 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Because of the national emergency triggered by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, government-mandated public health directives have drastically changed not only social norms but also the practice of oncologic medicine. Timely head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment must be prioritized, even during emergencies. Because severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 predominantly resides in the sinonasal/oral/oropharyngeal tracts, nonessential mucosal procedures are restricted, and HNCs are being triaged toward nonsurgical treatments when cures are comparable. Consequently, radiation utilization will likely increase during this pandemic. Even in radiation oncology, standard in-person and endoscopic evaluations are being restrained to limit exposure risks and preserve personal protective equipment for other frontline workers. The authors have implemented telemedicine and multidisciplinary conferences to continue to offer standard-of-care HNC treatments during this uniquely challenging time. Because of the lack of feasibility data on telemedicine for HNC, they report their early experience at a high-volume cancer center at the domestic epicenter of the COVID-19 crisis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jung Julie Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Richard J Wong
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Eric J Sherman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Alisa Rybkin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sean M McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nadeem Riaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - C Jillian Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yao Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Linda Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daphna Y Gelblum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Erin F Gillespie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Marc A Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Ian Ganly
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Snehal Patel
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Bhuvanesh Singh
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jay O Boyle
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Benjamin R Roman
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Luc G Morris
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ashok R Shaha
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lara A Dunn
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Alan L Ho
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - James V Fetten
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jatin P Shah
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David G Pfister
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
145
|
Ho HW, Lee SP, Lin HM, Chen HY, Huang CC, Wang SC, Yang CC, Lin YW. Dosimetric comparison between RapidArc and HyperArc techniques in salvage stereotactic body radiation therapy for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:164. [PMID: 32641082 PMCID: PMC7346374 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01602-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To evaluate dosimetric differences of salvage irradiations using two commercially available volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) techniques: RapidArc (RA) and HyperArc (HA), for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) after initial radiation therapy. Methods Ten patients with recurrent NPC status previously treated with radiation therapy were considered suitable candidates for salvage SBRT using VMAT approach. Two separate treatment plans were created with HA and RA techniques for each case, with dosimetric outcomes compared with respect to tumor target coverage and organs-at-risk (OARs) sparing. Furthermore, the cumulative radiobiological effects to the relevant OARs from the original radiotherapy to the respective salvage SBRT plans were analyzed in terms of biologically effective dose (BED). Results Treatment with HA exhibited similar target dose coverage as with RA, while delivering a higher mean dose to the targets. Using RA technique, the mean maximal doses to optic apparatus and the mean brain dose were reduced by 1 to 1.5 Gy, comparing to HA technique. The conformity index, gradient radius, and intermediate dose spillage in HA plans were significantly better than those in RA. With HA technique, the volume of brain receiving 12 Gy or more was reduced by 44%, comparing to RA technique. The cumulative BEDs to spinal cord and optic apparatus with RA technique were 1 to 2 Gy3 less than those with HA. HA technique significantly reduced the volume within body that received more than 100 Gy. Conclusions With better dose distribution than RA while maintaining sufficient target dose coverage, HA represents an attractive salvage SBRT technique for recurrent NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsiu-Wen Ho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, No.901, Jhonghua Rd., Yongkang Dist., Tainan City, 71004, Taiwan
| | - Steve P Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Hisu-Man Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, No.901, Jhonghua Rd., Yongkang Dist., Tainan City, 71004, Taiwan
| | - Hsiao-Yun Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, No.901, Jhonghua Rd., Yongkang Dist., Tainan City, 71004, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Chiao Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, No.901, Jhonghua Rd., Yongkang Dist., Tainan City, 71004, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Chang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, No.901, Jhonghua Rd., Yongkang Dist., Tainan City, 71004, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Chieh Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, No.901, Jhonghua Rd., Yongkang Dist., Tainan City, 71004, Taiwan.,Department of Pharmacy, Chia-Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Wei Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, No.901, Jhonghua Rd., Yongkang Dist., Tainan City, 71004, Taiwan. .,Department of Pharmacy, Chia-Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
146
|
Hung TM, Fan KH, Kang CJ, Huang SF, Lin CY, Ho ATY, Wang HM, Hsieh JCH, Cheng AJ, Ng SH, Chang JTC. Lymph node-to-primary tumor standardized uptake value ratio on PET predicts distant metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oral Oncol 2020; 110:104756. [PMID: 32652479 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Revised: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the prognostic value of the relative maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) ratio between neck lymph node and primary tumor (NTR) measured by pretreatment 18F-FDG PET in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed patients with non-disseminated NPC who underwent PET scans before radical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to identify the optimal cut-off value for NTR. The prognostic value of NTR for distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier method for survival analyses and Cox regression for multivariable analysis. RESULTS Among the 437 eligible patients, the median follow-up time was 62.9 (range, 2.1-113.0) months. Patients with high NTR (NTR > 0.9181) experienced significantly worse DMFS (5-year 80.5% vs. 91.6%, P < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, we found that patients with high NTR had significantly lower DMFS in T1-2 category (5-year 86.1% vs. 98.1%, P = 0.002), T3-4 category (5-year 71.5% vs. 86.2%, P = 0.010), N2-3 category (5-year 75.3% vs. 86.2%, P = 0.048), and stage IVA-B (5-year 69.8% vs. 85.4%, P = 0.012). Multivariable analysis showed that NTR was an independent prognostic factor for DMFS (HR 2.20, 95% CI 1.20-4.03, P = 0.011). CONCLUSION Pretreatment NTR is an easily accessible but potential prognosticator for DMFS in NPC patients treated by IMRT, which may help in providing more personalized treatment or designing future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsung-Min Hung
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Therapy Center, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Kang-Hsing Fan
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Therapy Center, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Jan Kang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Shiang-Fu Huang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Yu Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Therapy Center, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Albert Tsung-Ying Ho
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Center, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Hung-Ming Wang
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Jason Chia-Hsun Hsieh
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Ann-Joy Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Therapy Center, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Medical Biotechnology and Laboratory Science, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Hang Ng
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Therapy Center, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Xiamen, Xiamen, China.
| |
Collapse
|
147
|
Wang F, Jiang C, Wang L, Yan F, Piao Y, Ye Z, Xu M, Liu J, Fu Z, Jiang Y. Different Risk Target Volumes for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated with Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy. J Cancer 2020; 11:5210-5222. [PMID: 32742467 PMCID: PMC7378934 DOI: 10.7150/jca.45767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Although intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) provides promising survival advantages and fewer late complications in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC), appropriated target volumes and prescribed doses are still being explored. This study aimed to propose different risk target volumes and corresponding prescribed doses in our center and to evaluate the physical basis and efficacy of this protocol based on the long-term survival of NPC patients. Methods and Materials: We retrospectively assessed patients with histology-proven non-metastatic NPC treated with definitive IMRT using our protocol of different risk target volumes and corresponding prescribed doses based on the orderly stepwise pattern of tumor spread. We described the delineation for different risk target volumes and the design of IMRT planning for an NPC case. Additionally, we compared the dosimetric distributions between the China protocol and our protocol through two NPC cases. The patterns of failure and locoregional control were the primary endpoints. All survival outcomes were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: From January 2013 to December 2014, a total of 335 patients were treated; the median follow-up for patients who survived was 70 months. All patients completed IMRT using our protocol. Twenty-five patients developed locoregional recurrence, and all recurrences occurred within the high-dose target volumes. The rates of locoregional recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival at 5 years were 92.2%, 92.1%, 85.9%, and 86.3%, respectively. The biological effective doses of the prescribed doses in our protocol were similar to those of the China and 0615 protocols. Moreover, our protocol offered a reduction in D1 and D2 in the primary gross tumor volume (GTV), while V30 and V40 in normal tissues were lower. Conclusion: Our protocol of different risk target volume delineations and corresponding prescribed doses based on the stepwise pattern of tumor spread resulted in favorable locoregional control with no relapse outside the GTV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fangzheng Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China
| | - Chuner Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Department of Breast Tumor Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Department of Breast Tumor Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China
| | - Lei Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China
| | - Fengqin Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China
| | - Yongfeng Piao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhimin Ye
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China
| | - Min Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Department of Breast Tumor Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Department of Breast Tumor Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiping Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Department of Breast Tumor Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Department of Breast Tumor Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhenfu Fu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China.,Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310022, People's Republic of China
| | - Yangming Jiang
- Department of Digital Earth, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, CAS, Beijing, 100101, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
148
|
Jiří K, Vladimír V, Michal A, Matěj N, Silvia S, Pavel V, Kateřina D, Jana P, Barbora O, Eliška R, Petr L, Matěj P, Alexander G, Jozef R. Proton pencil-beam scanning radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer: dosimetric parameters and 2-year results. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 278:763-769. [PMID: 32623508 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06175-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients with nasopharyngeal cancer are candidates for proton radiotherapy due to large and comprehensive target volumes, and the necessity for sparing of healthy tissues. The aim of this work is to evaluate treatment outcome and toxicity profile of patients treated with proton pencil-beam scanning radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between Jan 2013 and June 2018, 40 patients were treated for nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) with IMPT (proton radiotherapy with modulated intensity). Median age was 47 years and the majority of patients had locally advanced tumors (stage 2-8 patients. (20%); stage 3-18 patients (45%); stage 4A-10 patients. (25%); stage 4B-4 patients. (10%). Median of total dose was 74 GyE (70-76 GyE) in 37 fractions (35-38). Bilateral neck irradiation was used in all cases. Concomitant chemotherapy was applied in 34 cases. (85%). Median follow-up time was 24 (1.5-62) months. RESULTS Two-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local control (LC) were 80%, 75%, and 84%, respectively. Acute toxicity was generally mild despite large target volumes and concurrent application of chemotherapy with skin toxicity and dysphagia reported as the most frequent acute side effects. The insertion of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrectomy (PEG) was necessary in four cases (10%). Serious late toxicity (G > 3. RTOG) was observed in two patients (5%) (dysphagia and brain necrosis). CONCLUSION IMPT for nasopharyngeal cancer patients is feasible with mild acute toxicity. Treatment outcomes are promising despite the high percentage of advanced disease in this group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kubeš Jiří
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000, Prague 8, Czech Republic
- Department of Oncology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital, Charles University, Kateřinská, 32 121 08, Praha 2, Czech Republic
- Department of Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague and Motol University Hospital, Kateřinská, 32 121 08, Praha 2, Czech Republic
- Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University, Sítná square 3105, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic
| | - Vondráček Vladimír
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000, Prague 8, Czech Republic
- Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University, Sítná square 3105, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic
| | - Andrlik Michal
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000, Prague 8, Czech Republic.
- Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University, Sítná square 3105, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic.
| | - Navrátil Matěj
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000, Prague 8, Czech Republic
- Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University, Sítná square 3105, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic
| | - Sláviková Silvia
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000, Prague 8, Czech Republic
| | - Vítek Pavel
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000, Prague 8, Czech Republic
- Department of Oncology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital, Charles University, Kateřinská, 32 121 08, Praha 2, Czech Republic
- Department of Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague and Motol University Hospital, Kateřinská, 32 121 08, Praha 2, Czech Republic
| | - Dědečková Kateřina
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000, Prague 8, Czech Republic
- Department of Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague and Motol University Hospital, Kateřinská, 32 121 08, Praha 2, Czech Republic
| | - Prausová Jana
- Department of Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague and Motol University Hospital, Kateřinská, 32 121 08, Praha 2, Czech Republic
| | - Ondrová Barbora
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000, Prague 8, Czech Republic
| | - Rotnáglová Eliška
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000, Prague 8, Czech Republic
| | - Lukeš Petr
- Proton Therapy Center Czech, Budínova 1a, 18000, Prague 8, Czech Republic
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, V Úvalu 84, 150 06, Prague 5, Czech Republic
| | - Patzelt Matěj
- Department of Medical Biophysics and Informatics, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Praha 10 Ruská 87, 100 00, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Ruská 87, 100 00, Praha 10, Czech Republic
| | - Grebenyuk Alexander
- Department of Health Protection and Disaster Medicine, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Lva Tolstogo 6-8, 197020, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - Rosina Jozef
- Department of Medical Biophysics and Informatics, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Praha 10 Ruská 87, 100 00, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University, Sítná square 3105, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
149
|
Li H, Chen X, Zeng W, Zhou W, Zhou Q, Wang Z, Jiang W, Xie B, Sun LQ. Radiation-Enhanced Expression of CCL22 in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma is Associated With CCR4 + CD8 T Cell Recruitment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 108:126-139. [PMID: 32428547 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2020] [Revised: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiation therapy elicits profound alterations in gene expression in tumor cells. This study aims to determine the dynamic changes in the expression of immunity-associated genes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) cells upon radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS The study was performed using NPC patient-derived tumor xenograft tumors, cell lines, CCR4+ CD8 T cells sorted from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of healthy volunteers, and TCGA-derived bulk RNA-seq or single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) data sets. Patient-derived tumor xenograft tumors or cell lines were irradiated and collected for bulk RNA sequencing or for CCL22 expression and release detection. Malignant phenotypes and radiosensitivity were assessed in cells with or without overexpression of CCL22 or recombinant CCL22 treatment in the presence or absence of irradiation. TCGA data sets were used for uncovering CCR4 status in subtypes of T cells. CCL22 in supernatants, cell lysates, or serum samples was measured with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS CCL22 was significantly increased in the irradiated patient-derived tumor xenograft tumors, the supernatants and cell lysates collected from irradiated NPC cell lines, and the serum of patients who received radiation therapy. No alterations of malignant phenotypes were found in tumor cells with CCL22 overexpression or recombinant CCL22 treatment. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that CCL22 or its receptor CCR4 positively correlated with cytotoxic T lymphocyte signatures, and high expression of CCL22 or CCR4 was associated with better prognosis for patients with NPC. scRNA-seq data set-based analysis demonstrated that CCR4 was expressed in multiple subtypes of T cells, including effector CD8 T cells. Chemotaxis assay indicated that CCR4+ CD8 T cells could be recruited by CCL22 treatment. CONCLUSION The radiation-enhanced release of CCL22 from NPC cells promotes migration of CCR4 + effector CD8 T cells, which might partially be associated with radiation therapy-mediated antitumor immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanghang Li
- Xiangya Cancer Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China; Key Laboratory of Molecular Radiation Oncology Hunan Province, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Xiang Chen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Wenjing Zeng
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Weibing Zhou
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Qin Zhou
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Zhan Wang
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Wuzhong Jiang
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Bowen Xie
- Xiangya Cancer Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China; Key Laboratory of Molecular Radiation Oncology Hunan Province, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Lun-Quan Sun
- Xiangya Cancer Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China; Key Laboratory of Molecular Radiation Oncology Hunan Province, Changsha, Hunan, China; National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China; Hunan International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Precision Medicine for Cancer, Changsha, Hunan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
150
|
Fei Z, Qiu X, Li M, Chen C, Li Y, Huang Y. Prognosis viewing for nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy: application of nomogram and decision curve analysis. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2020; 50:159-168. [PMID: 31711182 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyz165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Accepted: 10/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To view and evaluate the prognosis factors in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy using nomogram and decision curve analysis (DCA). METHODS Based on a primary cohort comprising consecutive patients with newly confirmed NPC (n = 1140) treated between January 2014 and December 2015, we identified independent prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) to establish a nomogram. The model was assessed by bootstrap internal validation and external validation in an independent validation cohort of 460 patients treated between January 2013 and December 2013. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability were measured by calibration curve, concordance index (C-index) and risk-group stratification. The clinical usefulness was assessed by DCA. RESULTS The nomogram incorporated T-stage, N-stage, age, concurrent chemotherapy and primary tumour volume (PTV). The calibration curve presented good agreement for between the nomogram-predicted OS and the actual measured survival probability in both the primary and validation cohorts. The model showed good discrimination with a C-index of 0.741 in the primary cohort and 0.762 in the validation cohort. The survival curves of different risk-groups were separated clearly. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the nomogram provided a higher net benefit (NB) across a wider reasonable range of threshold probabilities for predicting OS. CONCLUSION This study presents a predictive nomogram model with accurate prediction and independent discrimination ability compared with combination of T-stage and N-stage. The results of DCA supported the point that PTV can help improve the prognostic ability of T-stage and should be added to the TNM staging system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaodong Fei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University & Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Xiufang Qiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University & Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Mengying Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University & Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Chuanben Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University & Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Yi Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University & Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Yingying Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University & Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| |
Collapse
|