Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: multi-institutional experience

Place of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the armament against pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A survival, mortality and morbidity systematic review

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is one of the deadliest types of cancer worldwide, with a 5-year survival rate of 8% despite recent treatment advancements. The present systematic review aimed to investigate the role of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) following surgical resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, with or without peritoneal carcinomatosis. A systematic search of the MEDLINE and SCOPUS electronic databases was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. All possible relevant articles published between January 1980 and May 2019 were retrieved using multiple search terms associated with HIPEC and pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The initial search resulted in 1,244 reports, which condensed to 41 reports following screening of titles and abstracts, and subsequently to four reports following full-text thorough examination. The four reports included involved a prospective cohort study of HIPEC use in resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and three retrospective studies of HIPEC use following cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal carcinomatosis due to pancreatic adenocarcinoma, resulting in a total of 47 patients. The overall survival ranged between 2 and 62 months, and the hospital mortality rate was 8.5%. Morbidity (34%) was mainly attributed to anastomotic leak or respiratory failure. Due to the small sample size and low quality of evidence of the included studies, no valid conclusions could be drawn. Therefore, further studies are required to justify the use of HIPEC as an adjuvant therapy in resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma, while cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC in peritoneal carcinomatosis of pancreatic origin seems not only not useful but also unsafe at this level of evidence.

The Impact of Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Versus Four Quadrant Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Quality of Recovery After Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Surgery: A Single-Center, Noninferiority, Randomized, Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Recovery after CRS-HIPEC influenced by several factors, including pain and opioid consumption. We hypothesized that 4Q-TAP blocks provide not inferior quality of recovery compared with TEA after CRS-HIPEC. We conducted a randomized, controlled trial to determine whether 4-quadrant transversus abdominis plane (4Q-TAP) block analgesia was noninferior to thoracic epidural (TEA) among patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS HIPEC).

METHODS

Patients 18 years or older who underwent a CRS-HIPEC surgery were randomly assigned to have either TEA or 4Q-TAP blocks. The primary outcome of this study was the change in quality of recovery 2 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes included quality of recovery on Days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 30 postoperatively, opioid consumption, pain intensity, length of stay, and postoperative complications. Analyses were performed on a per-protocol basis.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients were included in the analysis. The difference between 4Q-TAP and TEA in the mean QoR-15 change from surgery at postoperative Days 1, 2, and 3 was 0.80 (P = 0.004), -4.5 (P = 0.134), and 3.4 (P = 0.003), respectively. All differences through postoperative day 30 were significantly within the noninferiority boundary of -10 except at postoperative Day 2 (P = 0.134). Length of stay, opioid-related adverse events, and frequency and grade of complications were not significantly different between TEA and 4Q-TAP patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the significantly higher use of opioids after CRS-HIPEC in patients with 4Q-TAP blocks, their short-term quality of recovery was not inferior to those treated with TEA. Patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC can be effectively managed with 4Q-TAP blocks.

Effect of Cilastatin on Cisplatin-Induced Nephrotoxicity in Patients Undergoing Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

Cisplatin is one of the most widely used chemotherapeutic agents in oncology, although its nephrotoxicity limits application and dosage. We present the results of a clinical study on prophylaxis of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis undergoing cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal intraoperative chemotherapy (HIPEC-cisplatin). Prophylaxis was with imipenem/cilastatin. Cilastatin is a selective inhibitor of renal dehydropeptidase I in the proximal renal tubule cells that can reduce the nephrotoxicity of cisplatin. Unfortunately, cilastatin is not currently marketed alone, and can only be administered in combination with imipenem. The study has a retrospective part that serves as a control (n = 99 patients receiving standard surgical prophylaxis) and a prospective part with imipenem/cilastatin prophylaxis corresponding to the study group (n = 85 patients). In both groups, we collected specific data on preoperative risk factors of renal damage, fluid management, hemodynamic control, and urine volume during surgery (including the hyperthermic chemotherapy perfusion), as well as data on hemodynamic and renal function during the first seven days after surgery. The main finding of the study is that cilastatin may exert a nephroprotective effect in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis undergoing cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal cisplatin perfusion. Creatinine values remained lower than in the control group (ANOVA test, p = 0.037). This translates into easier management of these patients in the postoperative period, with significantly shorter intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay.

The role of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the surgical management of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis, particularly for patients with metastatic disease. Treatment for oligometastatic presentation has been reported in recent literature, but the role of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) remains unclear. We performed a systematic literature search of the PubMed, Cochrane and Embase databases in order to identify clinical trials and case-series reporting on the safety and efficacy of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with PDAC-derived PM. Eight publications reporting on 85 patients were identified, using three different therapeutic strategies. First, 37 patients received cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for PDAC with PM. Grade 3 and 4 complications occurred in 37.8% of patients, without perioperative mortality. Median disease-free survival and overall survival (OS) rates varied from 4 to 36 months and 4 to 62 months, respectively. Secondly, 40 patients with resectable PDAC without PM received prophylactic HIPEC following pancreatic resection, with postoperative morbidity and mortality rates of 30% and 5%, and 5-year OS rates of 23-24%. Finally, eight patients with PDAC-derived peritoneal disease were converted to resectable disease after receiving neoadjuvant intraperitoneal chemotherapy and operated on with curative intent, achieving a median OS of 27.8 months. In conclusion, CRS with HIPEC for PDAC-derived PM appears to be safe, conferring the same postoperative morbidity and mortality as reported on non-pancreatic malignancies. In highly selected patients, it could be considered for short-term disease control. However, long-term survival remains poor. The addition of prophylactic HIPEC for resectable PDAC cannot be recommended.

Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery on Postoperative Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have been associated with significant morbidity and increased hospital length of stay (LOS). The authors report their experience after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program for CRS-HIPEC.

METHODS

Outcomes were analyzed before and after ERAS implementation. The components of ERAS included preoperative carbohydrate loading, goal-directed fluid management, multimodal pain management, minimization of narcotic use, avoidance of nasogastric tubes, and early mobilization and feeding.

RESULTS

Of 168 procedures, 88 (52%) were in the pre-ERAS group and 80 (48%) were in the post-ERAS group. The two groups did not differ in terms of age, sex, comorbidities, peritoneal carcinomatosis index scores, completeness of cytoreduction, or operative time. The ERAS patients received fewer fluids intraoperatively (mean, 4.2 vs 6.4 L; p < 0.01). The mean LOS was 7.9 days post-ERAS compared with 10.0 days pre-ERAS (p = 0.015). Clavien-Dindo complications classified as grade ≥ 3 were lower after ERAS (23.7% vs 38.6%; p = 0.04). Moreover, the readmission rates remained the same (16.2% vs 13.6%; p = 0.635).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of an ERAS program for patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC is feasible and not associated with an increase in overall major complications or readmissions. These data support incorporation of ERAS protocols for CRS-HIPEC procedures.

Diaphragmatic Peritonectomy and Full-Thickness Resection in CRS/HIPEC May Allow Higher Completeness of Cytoreduction Rates with a Low Rate of Respiratory Complications

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) provides a survival benefit when achieved without residual disease. As diaphragm is frequently affected in peritoneal malignancies, complete cytoreduction often requires surgical techniques over the diaphragm. The purpose of the study was to assess diaphragmatic resection impact on cytoreduction completeness, morbidity and mortality compared to less aggressive diaphragmatic peritonectomy in CRS and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) settings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis and supramesocolic disease undergoing CRS/HIPEC from 2011 to 2019 were included in a prospectively collected database. We compared patients who underwent full-thickness diaphragmatic resection (DR) and diaphragmatic peritonectomy (DP). Epidemiological and clinical data, morbidity, and mortality within 90 days of surgery were documented.

RESULTS

232 patients were initially selected. Inclusion criteria were met by 88 procedures. DR was performed on 32 patients and DP on 56. Number of resected organs was 5.21 in the DR cohort vs. 3.57 in the DP cohort (p<0.0001). Rate of Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) score >14 was higher in the DR group (75%) than in the DP group (50.9%) (p=0.027). Tumor invasion of diaphragmatic muscle after DR was confirmed in 89.3% patients. Postoperative pleural effusion was observed in 28 patients (50%) in the DP group and in 17 (53.1%) in the DR group.

CONCLUSIONS

CRS/HIPEC requires specific surgical techniques over the diaphragm to achieve complete cytoreduction. As diaphragmatic muscle invasion is frequent, full-thickness resection may allow a cytoreduction completeness increase without an increased morbidity. Pleural drains are not systematically required as these procedures show low incidence of major respiratory complications.

The Role of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Non-colorectal Peritoneal Surface Malignancies

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal carcinomatosis, from a variety of gastrointestinal and gynecological malignancies, has been historically challenging to treat and there remains a wide range of biologic aggressiveness in these patients. Malignancies commonly associated with PC include those of colorectal, appendiceal, gastric, ovarian, sarcoma, small intestinal, and primary peritoneal origin among others. Advances in our understanding of this unique disease process have led to significant interest in cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) as an emerging treatment option. The goal of CRS-HIPEC is to remove all visible macroscopic disease while preserving organ function, and then treat microscopic disease through perfusion of the peritoneal cavity with heated chemotherapy.

PURPOSE

Although recent reviews have focused on the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis secondary to colorectal cancer given the publication of several recent randomized controlled trials, the purpose of the current review is to summarize the evidence on CRS-HIPEC for non-colorectal peritoneal surface malignancies, including appendiceal neoplasms, malignant peritoneal mesothelioma, gastric cancer, and ovarian cancer.

RESULTS

While retrospective studies have clarified the importance of prognostic factors such as the peritoneal carcinomatosis index, completeness of cytoreduction, histopathological characteristics, and lymph node positivity, the lack of convincing level 1 evidence for the use of CRS-HIPEC has led to it remaining a highly controversial topic.

CONCLUSION

The decision to utilize CRS-HIPEC should involve a multidisciplinary team approach and evaluation of prognostic factors to balance the short-term morbidity of the operation with maximum long-term benefits. Large, multi-institutional groups and ongoing trials hold promise for clarifying the role of CRS-HIPEC in peritoneal surface malignancies.

Critical Analysis of Stage IV Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients after Treatment with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy followed by Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC)

Background

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) showed promise as initial treatment for stage IIIC (SIII) epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC); however, stage IV (SIV) outcomes are rarely reported. We assessed our experience and outcomes treating newly diagnosed SIV EOC with NACT plus CRS/HIPEC compared to SIII patients.

Methods

Advanced EOC from 2015–2018 managed with NACT (carboplatin/paclitaxel) due to unresectable disease or poor performance status followed by interval CRS/HIPEC were reviewed. Perioperative factors were assessed. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed by stage.

Results

Twenty-seven FIGO stage IIIC (n = 12) and IV (n = 15) patients were reviewed. Median NACT cycles were 3 and 4, respectively. Post-NACT omental caking, ascites, and pleural effusions decreased/resolved in 91%, 91%, and 100% of SIII and 85%, 92%, and 71% of SIV. SIII/SIV median PCI was 21 and 20 obtaining 92% and 100% complete cytoreduction (≤0.25 cm), respectively. Median organ resections were 6 and 7, respectively. Grade III/IV surgical complications were 0% SIII and 23% SIV, without hospital mortality. Median time to adjuvant chemotherapy was 53 and 74 days, respectively (p=0.007). SIII OS at 1 and 2 years was 100% and 83% and 87% and 76% in SIV (p=0.269). SIII 1-year PFS was 54%; median PFS: 12 months. SIV 1- and 2- year PFS was 47% and 23%; median PFS: 12 months (p=0.944).

Conclusion

Outcomes in select initially diagnosed and unresectable SIV EOC are similar to SIII after NACT plus CRS/HIPEC. SIV EOC may benefit from CRS/HIPEC, and further studies should explore this treatment approach.

The role of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis: a systematic review including evidence from Japan

The prognosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis is poor. However, the emergence of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) as a treatment option has prolonged survival and it can even potentially cure patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Randomized controlled studies and other observational studies indicated that this combined therapy potentially improved the prognosis of patients with colon, gastric, and ovarian cancers with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates. Even in rarer diseases, such as pseudomyxoma peritonei and malignant peritoneal mesothelioma, CRS + HIPEC markedly improved the prognoses over those with conventional treatment. Based on the accumulated evidence, clinical guidelines recommend CRS + HIPEC for selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. However, several issues still need to be overcome. A standard method for HIPEC has not yet been established. Furthermore, the criteria employed for patient selection need to be clarified to achieve real benefits. The peritoneal cancer index, chemo-sensitivity and several biological markers are considered to be key factors.

Centralization and Oncologic Training Reduce Postoperative Morbidity and Failure-to-rescue Rates After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Surface Malignancies: Study on a 10-year National French Practice

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate at a national level the postoperative mortality (POM), major morbidity (MM) and failure-to-rescue (FTR) after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) across time and according to hospital-volume.

BACKGROUND

CRS/HIPEC is an effective therapeutic strategy commonly used to treat peritoneal surface malignancies. However, this aggressive approach has the reputation to be associated with a high POM and MM.

METHODS

All patients treated with CRS/HIPEC between 2009 and 2018 in France were identified through a national medical database. Patients and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. A cut-off value of the annual CRS/HIPEC caseload affecting the 90-day POM was calculated using the Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detector method. A multivariable logistic model was used to identify factors mediating 90-day POM.

RESULTS

A total of 7476 CRS/HIPEC were analyzed. Median age was 59 years with a mean Elixhauser comorbidity index of 3.1, both increasing over time (P < 0.001). Ninety-day POM was 2.6%. MM occurred in 44.2% with a FTR rate of 5.1%. The threshold of CRS/HIPEC number per center per year above which the 90-day POM was significantly reduced was 45 (3.2% vs 1.9%, P = 0.01). High-volume centers had more extended surgery (P < 0.001) with increased MM (55.8% vs 40.4%, P < 0.001) but lower FTR (3.1% vs 6.3%, P = 0.001). After multivariate analysis, independent factors associated with 90-day POM were: age >70 years (P = 0.002), Elixhauser comorbidity index ≥8 (P = 0.006), lower gastro-intestinal origin, (P < 0.010), MM (P < 0.001), and <45 procedures/yr (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

In France, CRS/HIPEC is a safe procedure with an acceptable 90-day POM that could even be improved through centralization in high-volume centers.

In-Hospital Mortality and Complication Rates According to Health Insurance Data in Patients Undergoing Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Surface Malignancies in Germany

BACKGROUND

Morbidity and in-hospital mortality rates of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in Germany are not known.

METHODS

From 2009 to 2018 all patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in Germany were retrospectively analyzed regarding morbidity and in-hospital mortality rates according to nationwide hospital billing data based on diagnosis-related groups (DRG). The "failure to rescue" (FTR) index, characterizing patients who died after severe but potentially manageable complications, was calculated.

RESULTS

In total, 8463 patients were included and analyzed. Female sex predominated (1.5:1). Colonic origin of peritoneal metastasis was highest throughout all years, reaching its highest level in 2017 (55%; n = 563) and its lowest level in 2012 (40%; n = 349). Median length of hospital stay reached its maximum in 2017 at 23.9 days and its minimum in 2010 at 22.0 days. Analysis of the total FTR index showed a noticeable improvement over the years, reaching its lowest values in 2017 (9.8%) and 2018 (8.8%). The FTR index for sepsis, peritonitis, and pulmonary complications significantly improved over time. Of the 8463 included patients, 290 died during hospital stay, reflecting an in-hospital mortality rate of 3.4%.

CONCLUSION

In-hospital mortality after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is reasonably low compared with other surgical procedures. The improvement in the FTR index reflects efforts to centralize treatment at specialized high-volume centers.

CRS/HIPEC with Major Organ Resection in Peritoneal Mesothelioma Does not Impact Major Complications or Overall Survival: A Retrospective Cohort Study of the US HIPEC Collaborative

INTRODUCTION

CRS/HIPEC is thought to confer a survival advantage for patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM). However, the impact of nonperitoneal organ resection is not clearly defined. We evaluated the impact of major organ resection (MOR) on postoperative outcomes and overall survival (OS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The US HIPEC collaborative database (2000-2017) was reviewed for MPM patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC. MOR was defined as total or partial resection of diaphragm, stomach, spleen, pancreas, small bowel, colon, rectum, kidney, ureter, bladder, and/or uterus. MOR was categorized as 0, 1, or 2+ organs.

RESULTS

A total of 174 patients were identified. Median PCI was 16 (3-39). The distribution of patients with MOR-0, MOR-1, and MOR-2+ was 94, 45, and 35 patients, respectively. MOR-1 and MOR-2+ groups had a higher frequency of any complication compared with MOR-0 (57.8%, 74.3%, and 48.9%, respectively, p = 0.035), but Clavien 3/4 complications were similar. Median length of stay was slightly higher in the MOR-1 and MOR-2+ groups (10 and 11 days) compared with the MOR-0 cohort (9 days, p = 0.005). Incomplete cytoreduction, ASA class 4, and male gender were associated with increased mortality on unadjusted analysis; however, their impact on OS was attenuated on multivariable analysis. MOR was not associated with OS based on these data (MOR-1: HR 1.67, 95% CI 0.59-4.74; MOR-2+ : HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.22-2.69).

CONCLUSIONS

MOR was not associated with an increase in major complications or worse OS in patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for MPM and should be considered, if necessary, to achieve complete cytoreduction for MPM patients.

Prognostic impact of combined progression index based on peritoneal grading regression score and peritoneal cytology in peritoneal metastasis

AIMS

The peritoneal regression grading score (PRGS) and peritoneal cytology (PC) assess response to chemotherapy in peritoneal metastasis (PM) in a setting of palliative treatment by pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Progression has been defined as an increase of PRGS between first and third PIPAC procedures (iPRGS). iPRGSand positive peritoneal cytology were not associated with prognostic impact. These results may be explained by a lack of statistical power. Also, it is not known whether the mean or the highest PRGS among taken peritoneal biopsies bears the highest clinical value. We therefore conducted the largest prospective study to investigate the prognostic impact of PGRS, PC, and their combination, designated as combined progression index (CPI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with PM who underwent >3 PIPAC (n = 112) between December 2016 and February 2019 were prospectively included. A significant difference in OS and PFS according to CPI (used highest value of PRGS) was found (OS: CPI-, 83.3, 95% CI [49.8; NA] vs. CPI+, 48.1, 95% CI [38.5; 66.4] months; and PFS (respectively, 59.7, 95% CI [43.0; 96.0] vs. 33.7, 95% CI [30.4; 44.2] months). PRGS or PC had no independent prognostic impact. CPI+ was an independent predictor of worse prognosis, in OS (HR = 5.24, 95% CI [2.07; 13.26]), and PFS (HR = 4.41, 95% CI [1.40; 13.88]).

CONCLUSIONS

The CPI based on highest PRGS and PC was found to be independently associated with a worse prognosis for OS and for PFS in the setting of peritoneal metastasis. These results indicate that it should be of interest to systematically take peritoneal fluid for cytological examination and to implement the CPI in the therapeutic decision-making process in the context of PIPAC.

Prophylactic chemotherapeutic hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion reduces peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer: a retrospective clinical study

Background

Peritoneal metastasis is the most frequent failure in gastric cancer. This study evaluated the role of prophylactic chemotherapeutic hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion (CHIP) in patients after D2 dissection.

Methods

Gastric cancer patients after D2 dissection were enrolled in this study. Patients received either chemotherapy (IV group) or CHIP (CHIP group). Sites of recurrence or metastasis, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events were evaluated.

Results

Twenty-two patients received CHIP treatment, and 21 patients received chemotherapy alone. The median DFS time was 24.5 and 36.5 months in the IV group and CHIP group (P = 0.044), respectively. The median OS time was 33.1 months in the IV group and not reached in the CHIP group (P = 0.037). We also found that CHIP could reduce the total recurrence/metastasis rate, especially that of peritoneal metastasis. In the subgroup analysis, DFS and OS were both superior in deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) patients than in proficient MMR (pMMR) patients.

Conclusion

This hypothesis-generating study indicates that CHIP might be feasible for gastric cancer patients after D2 resection.

Advances with pharmacotherapy for peritoneal metastasis

INTRODUCTION

A new treatment strategy involving cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with perioperative intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy was proposed in 1999 by the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International, and the strategy is now justified as a state-of-the-art treatment to improve the long-term survival of patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM). To achieve cure in the patients with PM, complete removal of macroscopic tumors and eradication of micrometastasis on the peritoneum, left after CRS are essential. Systemic chemotherapy is not indicated for the treatment of PM. In contrast, intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy brings about significantly higher locoregional dose intensity in the peritoneal cavity and subperitoneal tissues. In combination with anticancer drugs, hyperthermia enhances cytotoxicity against cancer cells.

AREA COVERED

This article provides a systematic overview of PM from various cancers including gastric, colorectal, small bowel, appendiceal cancer, and mesothelioma. It also includes all the essential aspects of therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

CRS plus perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy is safe with acceptable morbidity and mortality. It is justified as a standard treatment to improve the long-term survival of patients with PM and is now performed with curative intent for PM from various malignancies.

Prognostic Utility of Pre- and Postoperative Circulating Tumor DNA Liquid Biopsies in Patients with Peritoneal Metastases

BACKGROUND

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising technology for treatment selection, prognostication, and surveillance after definitive therapy. Its use in the perioperative setting for patients with metastatic disease has not been well studied. We characterize perioperative plasma ctDNA and its association with progression-free survival (PFS) in patients undergoing surgery for peritoneal metastases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We recruited 71 patients undergoing surgery for peritoneal metastases and evaluated their plasma with a targeted 73-gene ctDNA next-generation sequencing test before and after surgery. The association between perioperative ctDNA, as well as other patient factors, and PFS was evaluated by Cox regression.

RESULTS

ctDNA was detectable in 28 patients (39.4%) preoperatively and in 37 patients (52.1%) postoperatively. Patients with high ctDNA [maximum somatic variant allele fraction (MSVAF) > 0.25%] had worse PFS than those with low MSVAF (< 0.25%) in both the pre- and postoperative settings (median 4.8 vs. 19.3 months, p < 0.001, and 9.2 vs.15.0 months, p = 0.049, respectively; log-rank test). On multivariate analysis, high-grade histology [hazard ratio (HR) 3.42, p = 0.001], incomplete resection (HR 2.35, p = 0.010), and high preoperative MSVAF (HR 3.04, p = 0.001) were associated with worse PFS. Patients with new postoperative alterations in the context of preoperative alteration(s) also had a significantly shorter PFS compared with other groups (HR 4.28, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

High levels of perioperative ctDNA and new postoperative ctDNA alterations in the context of preoperative alterations predict worse outcomes in patients undergoing resection for peritoneal metastases. This may highlight a role for longitudinal ctDNA surveillance in this population.

Prognostic role of radiological peritoneal cancer index in malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: national cohort study

Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPeM) is a rare cancer of the mesothelial cells of the peritoneum. Computed tomography (CT) is considered the standard for first-line imaging of MPeM, diagnosis and risk stratification remains challenging. Peritoneal cancer index (PCI), as assessed by CT, is utilized in the prognostic assessment of other malignant intra-abdominal conditions; however, there is limited data concerning the utility of PCI in the diagnosis and workup of MPeM. We studied a retrospective cohort of all patients diagnosed with MPeM from 2000 to 2012 in Finland. CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were reviewed and scored by an experienced and blinded, board-certified abdominal radiologist. Additional clinical data and outcomes were obtained from Finnish Cancer Registry (FCR), the Workers' Compensations Center (WCC), and Statistics Finland (SF). Abdominal CT or MRI was available for 53 of 90 patients. The median radiographic PCI was 25. PCI score was correlated with overall survival (p = 0.004, Exp(B) = 1.064, 95% CI 1.020-1.110). PCI score ≥ 30 was associated with worse survival (p = 0.002), while PCI ≤ 19 was associated with improved overall survival (p = 0.001). Our study indicates that radiological PCI is prognostic in MPeM and should be assessed during radiographic workup and integrated into clinical decision-making.

Phase I Trial of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemoperfusion (HIPEC) with Cisplatin, Mitomycin, and Paclitaxel in Patients with Gastric Adenocarcinoma and Associated Carcinomatosis or Positive Cytology

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this phase I trial is to evaluate the safety and toxicity of laparoscopic hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion with chemotherapy (HIPEC), combining mitomycin, cisplatin, and paclitaxel for patients with gastric cancer metastatic to the peritoneum.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A Bayesian optimal interval design was used to prospectively identify the safety and tolerability of escalating doses of paclitaxel in combination with flat doses of mitomycin (30 mg) and cisplatin (200 mg) during laparoscopic HIPEC. The primary objective is to define the maximum tolerated dose. Secondary endpoints include surgical complications and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 27 patients were treated between 11/2017 and 11/2018. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Treatment-related grade 1-2 toxicities were leukopenia (11%), oral dysesthesia (4%), arthralgia (4%), and diarrhea (4%). Treatment-related grade 3-4 toxicities included leukopenia (4%) and neutropenia (4%). The maximum dose for paclitaxel was 60 mg/m². Rates of Clavien-Dindo surgical complications were grade I 96% (all electrolyte deficiencies requiring replacement), II 4%, III 0%, IV 0%, and V 4%. The median follow-up time was 15 months. One- and 2-year OS rates from date of metastatic disease were 73.9% and 58.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic HIPEC with mitomycin, cisplatin, and paclitaxel may be safely used at intraperitoneal doses of 30 mg, 200 mg, and 60 mg/m², respectively. Although electrolyte abnormalities were common, systemic toxicity was low. Survival rates were promising, supporting further research into intraperitoneal therapy for stage IV gastric cancer.

The importance of primary tumor origin in gastrointestinal malignancies undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

Background

Appendiceal and colorectal cancers with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) can derive benefit from cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC). However, its role in gastric and small bowel malignancies remains undefined.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 251 gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas with PC which underwent CRS/HIPEC at our institution from 2007 to 2017. We compared outcomes of gastric, small bowel, appendiceal, and colorectal cohorts.

Results

Thirty-one gastric, 8 small bowel, 91 appendiceal, and 121 colorectal cohorts were included. More gastric cancers (90%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy than any other cohort, p = 0.002. Although colorectal had the lowest peritoneal cancer index (PCI) (9) and appendiceal the highest (16), all cohorts underwent similar rates of organ resection and complete cytoreduction. Length of stay (p = 0.005) and major perioperative morbidity (Clavien III/IV, p = 0.011) were significantly higher in gastric and small bowel. Median overall survival (OS, p < 0.001) was significantly shorter in gastric (13 months) and small bowel (9 months) than in appendiceal (33 months) and colorectal (42 months) cohorts. On multivariate analysis, complete cytoreduction and PCI score were significant predictors of OS, p < 0.05.

Conclusions

Primary tumor origin significantly affects outcomes after CRS/HIPEC for gastrointestinal malignancies. Though there was a survival benefit in appendiceal and colorectal, gastric and small bowel survival was comparable to systemic chemotherapy.

A comprehensive review of childbearing after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Our aim is to present a review on childbearing following CRS and HIPEC for peritoneal malignancy.

METHODS

A review of the English literature, up to December 2019, was conducted, using PubMed/MEDLINE, EmBase and Google Scholar bibliographic databases, following the MOOSE guidelines. The terms "Cytoreductive Surgery", "Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy", "Peritoneal Carcinomatosis", "Pregnancy", "Fertility Preservation", "Conception" were used. All study designs were eligible for inclusion in the final analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 7 studies (5 case reports and 2 case series) were included in the final analysis, reporting on 14 successful pregnancies after CRS and HIPEC. The mean age of patients at the time of CRS/HIPEC was 28.8 ± 5.9 years (range 18-36), while the mean interval between CRS/HIPEC and pregnancy was 29.6 ± 20.3 months (range 9-80 months). Nine patients were treated for pseudomyxoma peritonei, four for primary peritoneal mesothelioma and one for endocrine carcinoma. Mean Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index was 9.8 ± 7.8 (range 1-26). All patients underwent fertility-sparing CRS (preservation of at least one ovary and the uterus). In 12 cases, conception was spontaneous, whereas two pregnancies were achieved through in-vitro fertilization. One patient developed gestational hypertension, while two labors were preterm. Mean disease-free survival was 64.1 months (range 24-106 months).

CONCLUSION

A successful pregnancy is feasible in selected patients, after CRS and HIPEC. Assisted reproduction techniques (IVF using frozen oocytes or frozen embryos, ovarian tissue cryopreservation, preoperative treatment with GnRH analogs) should be discussed pre-operatively with the patient, without, however, compromising overall survival or risking locoregional recurrence.

Distal pancreatectomy in cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: Identifying risk and improving patient selection

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) has become a principal tool in the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), but inclusion of pancreatic resection to obtain optimal debulking remains controversial.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 419 patients with PC who underwent CRS/HIPEC. The patients were divided into two cohorts, those with distal pancreatectomy (DP) and those without (NP), and morbidity and survival outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

The DP cohort (n = 37) and the NP cohort (n = 371) had similar clinicopathologic characteristics (age, p = 0.596; gender, p = 0.328; ASA, p = 0.072). Operative time, number of organs resected, and EBL were greater in the DP cohort (<0.0001). A complete cytoreduction was achieved in 90% of the NP cohort versus 69% of the DP cohort (p = 0.0004). Major perioperative morbidity was more common in those with pancreatic resection (41% vs 19%, p = 0.002). However, there was no significant difference in 90-day mortality or overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Achieving complete cytoreduction is critical to improving long term outcomes for patients with PC. Although pancreatic resections are associated with higher morbidity, short-term survival is not impacted adversely. Pancreatic involvement should not be a strict exclusion criterion for CRS/HIPEC, but patients need to be selected carefully, with close attention to disease burden prior to proceeding.

A rare case of recurrent epidermoid anal cancer treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy-case report

Background

Anal cancer is a rare cancer with chemoradiation being the mainstay of treatment for locoregional presentation. In North America, the most common subtype is anal squamous cell carcinoma (epidermoid). A surgical approach is considered for persistent or recurrent anal disease and systemic chemotherapy for metastatic disease. We are presenting a unique case of recurrent anal cancer with isolated peritoneal malignancy, an oligometastatic state which is rare in itself. It was treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. There are currently no clear guidelines for the aforementioned presentation. The discussion drew on the feasibility and safety of this approach.

Case presentation

A 68-year-old woman diagnosed with an epidermoid anal cancer (stage 3B) was initially treated with chemoradiation therapy (Standard Nigro Protocol) in 2014. At the 5-year mark post-treatment, she was diagnosed with a recurrent anal epidermoid cancer in the form of isolated peritoneal carcinomatosis proven by biopsy. After declining systemic chemotherapy, she underwent cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with Mitomycin-C©. Peritoneal carcinomatosis index was evaluated at 10, and intraoperative frozen sections were positive for carcinoma of epidermoid origin compatible with anal cancer. A completeness of cytoreduction score of 0 was achieved during the cytoreductive surgery, and her hospital course was unremarkable. She remains disease-free 12 months later.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first case reporting the disease presentation of anal cancer with oligometastatic dissemination to the peritoneum. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy were performed. Thus far, this approach seems to be a safe and feasible option for short-term control of the disease.

Pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy: rationale, evidence, and potential indications

Pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) was introduced as a new treatment for patients with peritoneal metastases in November, 2011. Reports of its feasibility, tolerance, and efficacy have encouraged centres worldwide to adopt PIPAC as a novel drug delivery technique. In this Review, we detail the technique and rationale of PIPAC and critically assess its evidence and potential indications. A systematic search was done to identify all relevant literature on PIPAC published between Jan 1, 2011, and Jan 31, 2019. A total of 106 articles or reports on PIPAC were identified, and 45 clinical studies on 1810 PIPAC procedures in 838 patients were included for analysis. Repeated PIPAC delivery was feasible in 64% of patients with few intraoperative and postoperative surgical complications (3% for each in prospective studies). Adverse events (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events greater than grade 2) occurred after 12-15% of procedures, and commonly included bowel obstruction, bleeding, and abdominal pain. Repeated PIPAC did not have a negative effect on quality of life. Using PIPAC, an objective clinical response of 62-88% was reported for patients with ovarian cancer (median survival of 11-14 months), 50-91% for gastric cancer (median survival of 8-15 months), 71-86% for colorectal cancer (median survival of 16 months), and 67-75% (median survival of 27 months) for peritoneal mesothelioma. From our findings, PIPAC has been shown to be feasible and safe. Data on objective response and quality of life were encouraging. Therefore, PIPAC can be considered as a treatment option for refractory, isolated peritoneal metastasis of various origins. However, its use in further indications needs to be validated by prospective studies.

Establishing of Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Treatment Program: Background in Ukraine, Patient Selection, Staff Schedule, Perioperative Outcomes of First 28 Patients

A combination of cytoreductive intervention with the intrahepatic hyperthermic chemotherapy is a well-established treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis. There are many challenges in establishing a new peritoneal surface malignancy program in a low-income country regarding perioperative safety and resource allocation. We analyzed the retrospective database to determine the immediate surgical outcomes of the first 28 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis and the impact of the program on allocation of general hospital and human resources. During the preparatory stage, web conferences with international experts established the goals and general requirements of the program, formalized in a written document; and a peritoneal surface malignancy multidisciplinary team was established. The team created the patient selection criteria, perioperative management checklists, and suggested material and staff requirements for surgical and anesthesia services. Twenty-nine cytoreduction were carried out, of which 18 were followed by HIPEC. The average operative time was 6.2 h. The median blood loss was 350 mL, which did not result in additional blood transfusion requirements for the blood bank. No additional nursing and supportive staff were provided for the ICU and the surgical unit. The average postoperative stay was 8.7 days. One patient died with 30-day mortality rate of 3%. Ten patients (34.5%) developed postoperative complications, of which 6 (20.6%) had grade III and higher Clavien-Dindo complications. Establishing a peritoneal surface malignancy program is possible via staged planning, liberal use of international mentors, and thoughtful resource allocation. This new program did not result in a significant redistribution of resources among other service lines of cancer care within the same institution.

Cytoreduction surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for treating advanced peritoneal metastases of hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

An effective treatment strategy for peritoneal metastasis (PM) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC-PM) has yet to be established. Although cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have shown favorable outcomes in certain malignancies, their role in peritoneal metastatic HCC is unclear. Herein, we present a series of patients with HCC-PM treated with CRS/HIPEC and evaluate their outcomes.

METHODS

Records of patients with HCC-PM who had undergone CRS/HIPEC at the Hyperthermia Center of Yuan's General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, between September 2015 and December 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were followed up until September 2019. We assessed the clinical courses and outcomes of these patients to clarify the benefits of CRS/HIPEC.

RESULTS

Six patients were included in our study. HCC-PM occurred synchronously in one patient and occurred metachronously in five patients after therapeutic minimally invasive procedures, including radiofrequency ablation, laparoscopic hepatectomy, robotic hepatectomy or spontaneously. The median peritoneal cancer index was 18.5. All patients experienced complete peritoneal cytoreduction without perioperative mortality. One patient had two CTCAE grade 3 complications. The median follow-up was 16 months. The median overall survival was 15.7 months. Four patients died of lung metastasis or liver failure owing to intrahepatic recurrence. The survival rates observed at 1, 2, and 4 years were 66.7%, 33.3%, and 33.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CRS followed by HIPEC is feasible in patients with HCC-PM and might provide selected patients a chance for local disease control and longer survival. CRS/HIPEC might be considered as a treatment option in highly selected patients, as part of multimodal therapy approaches.

Multicystic and diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma in children

BACKGROUND

Malignant and multicystic peritoneal mesotheliomas are extremely rare tumors in children, developing from mesothelial cells. No specific guidelines are available at this age.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of all identified children (< 18-year-old) treated in France from 1987 to 2017 for a diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) or a multicystic peritoneal mesothelioma (MCPM).

RESULTS

Fourteen patients (5 males and nine females), aged 2.2 to 17.5 years, were included. The most frequent presenting symptoms were abdominal pain, ascitis, and alteration in the general condition. Eight patients had epithelioid mesothelioma, three had biphasic mesothelioma, and three had MCPM. Eight patients with DMPM diagnosis received cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Among them, six patients had neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy, one patient, post-operative chemotherapy, and one patient CRS and HIPEC only. Three patients received only systemic chemotherapy. All patients with MCPM had only surgery. After a median follow-up of seven years (2-15), six patients (6/11; one death) with DMPM and two patients (two/three) with MCPM had a local and distant recurrences.

CONCLUSION

Peritoneal mesothelioma in children is a rare condition with difficult diagnosis and high risk of recurrence. Worldwide interdisciplinary collaboration and networking are mandatory to help diagnosis and provide harmonious treatment guidelines.

Haemodynamic management during hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: A systematic review

CONTEXT

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a surgical technique for peritoneal carcinomatosis combining cytoreduction surgery and peritoneal irrigation of cytotoxic agents responsible for haemodynamics and fluid homeostasis alterations. To this day, no guidelines exist concerning intraoperative management.

OBJECTIVES

To review data on haemodynamic monitoring and management of patients undergoing HIPEC and to help design a standardised anaesthetic protocol.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane library were searched using the following.

STUDY SELECTION

Original articles and case-reports. Letters to editors and reviews were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data on haemodynamic management, morbidity and mortality.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Haemodynamic management during HIPEC is highly variable and depends on local protocols. Only one randomised controlled trial evaluated the benefit of goal-directed fluid administration (GDFA). GDFA guided by advanced haemodynamic monitoring resulted in significantly less complication, shorter length of stay and less mortality compared to standard fluid administration. Renal protection protocol did not decrease the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI).

CONCLUSION

Our review reveals that fluid administration guided by advanced monitoring seems to be associated with less postoperative morbidity and mortality after HIPEC. Nevertheless, the literature review shows that intraoperative haemodynamic management is highly variable for this surgery. The use of renal protection strategy does not decrease the prevalence of AKI. Further prospective trials comparing different fluid management and haemodynamic monitoring strategies are urgently needed (PROSPERO registration CRD42018115720).

The Chicago Consensus on Peritoneal Surface Malignancies: Management of Peritoneal Mesothelioma

The Chicago Consensus Working Group provides multidisciplinary recommendations for the management of peritoneal mesothelioma. These guidelines are developed with input from leading experts including surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, palliative care physicians, and pharmacists. These guidelines recognize and address the emerging need for increased awareness of the appropriate management of peritoneal surface disease. They are not intended to replace the quest for higher levels of evidence.

The Chicago Consensus on peritoneal surface malignancies: Management of peritoneal mesothelioma

The Chicago Consensus Working Group provides multidisciplinary recommendations for the management of peritoneal mesothelioma. These guidelines are developed with input from leading experts, including surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, palliative care physicians, and pharmacists. These guidelines recognize and address the emerging need for increased awareness of the appropriate management of peritoneal surface disease. They are not intended to replace the quest for higher levels of evidence.

Readmissions after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy-a national population-based study

Background

Comprehensive readmission morbidity studies after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are scarce. This study aimed to investigate readmissions and in-hospital morbidity after CRS and HIPEC.

Methods

The national in-hospital patient register was used to identify patients via the HIPEC ICD code JAQ10 2004–2014. Data were retrieved from the index CRS/HIPEC treatment and from all HIPEC-related readmissions within 6 months. Univariate/multivariate logistical analyses were performed to identify risk factors for reinterventions and readmissions.

Results

A total of 519 patients (mean age 56 years) had a mean hospital stay of 27 days. Within 6 months, 150 readmissions for adverse events were observed in 129 patients (25%) with 67 patients requiring an intervention (13%). Totally 179 patients (34%) required a reintervention during the first 6 months with 85 (16%) requiring a reoperation. Of these 179 patients, 83 patients (46%) did not undergo the intervention at the HIPEC centre. Gastric resection was the only independent risk factor for in-hospital intervention, and advanced age for readmission.

Conclusion

Morbidity causing HIPEC-related readmission was higher than expected with almost half of the interventions occurring outside the HIPEC centre. Gastric resection and high age are independent predictors of morbidity and readmission.

Pseudomyxoma peritonei: visceral scalloping on CT is a predictor of recurrence after complete cytoreductive surgery

OBJECTIVES

Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is characterized by peritoneal dissemination of gelatinous ascites following rupture of a mucinous tumor. Treatment by cytoreductive surgery (CRS) has improved its prognosis. Although visceral scalloping, notably liver scalloping, on computed tomography (CT) is a typical feature of PMP, its prognostic value remains unknown. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of liver scalloping in predicting recurrence in PMP patients.

METHODS

Among 159 consecutive patients with PMP who had contrast-enhanced CT between September 2012 and December 2018, 64 treatment-naïve patients who subsequently underwent CRS with complete resection (i.e., completeness of cytoreduction score (CC)-0 or CC-1), were included in analysis. Presence of liver scalloping and maximum thickness of mucin deposition at the liver surface were evaluated on CT. Disease-free survival (DFS) was determined based on the combination of postoperative CT features and tumor marker values.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 24.3 months. CT revealed liver scalloping in 40/64 (63.4%) patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significantly shorter DFS in patients with scalloping than in those without (p = 0.001; hazard ratio, 4.3). In patients with scalloping, greater mucin deposition (thickness ≥ 20 mm) significantly correlated with poorer DFS (p = 0.042). In multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression including CC status, pathologic type, and tumor markers, the presence of scalloping independently and significantly correlated with DFS (p = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

Liver scalloping was an independent predictor even after adjusting for clinical covariates. The presence of liver scalloping can lead to a high recurrence rate after CRS.

KEY POINTS

• The presence of liver scalloping is a prognostic factor independent of histological grade and tumor markers. • Greater mucin deposition (thickness ≥ 20 mm at the liver surface) is associated with higher recurrence rates in patients with liver scalloping.

Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Gene Rearrangement in Children and Young Adults With Mesothelioma

INTRODUCTION

Children and young adults diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma may have unique genetic characteristics. In this study, we evaluated for the presence of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocations in these patients.

METHODS

In a prospective study of mesothelioma natural history (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01950572), we assessed for the presence of the ALK translocation in patients younger than 40 years, irrespective of the site of disease. The presence of this translocation was assessed by means of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). If the patients tested positive for the ALK translocation, both immunohistochemistry and RNA sequencing were performed on the tumor specimen.

RESULTS

Between September 2013 and December 2018, 373 patients were enrolled in the mesothelioma natural history study, of which 32 patients were 40 years old or younger at the time of their mesothelioma diagnosis. There were 25 patients with peritoneal mesothelioma, five with pleural mesothelioma, one with pericardial mesothelioma, and one with bicompartmental mesothelioma. Presence of an ALK translocation by FISH was seen in two of the 32 patients (6%) with mesothelioma. Both patients, a 14-year-old female and a 27-year-old male, had peritoneal mesothelioma and had no history of asbestos exposure, prior radiation therapy, or predisposing germline mutations. Neither had detectable ALK expression by immunohistochemistry. RNA sequencing revealed the presence of an STRN fusion partner in the female patient but failed to identify any fusion protein in the male patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Young patients with peritoneal mesothelioma should be evaluated for the presence of ALK translocations. Presence of this translocation should be assessed by FISH and these patients could potentially benefit from tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting ALK.

Diagnostic Laparoscopy and Abdominal Cytology Reliably Detect Peritoneal Metastases in Patients with Urachal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Urachal adenocarcinoma (UrAC) is a rare malignancy that can cause peritoneal metastases (PM). Analogous to other enteric malignancies, selected patients with limited PM of UrAC can be treated by cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to address the value of diagnostic laparoscopy (DLS) and abdominal cytology (ACyt) for the detection and evaluation of the extent of PM in patients with UrAC.

METHODS

A consecutive series of cN0M0 patients with UrAC who underwent DLS with or without ACyt at a tertiary referral center between 2000 and 2018 was assessed. Patients were staged with computed tomography (CT) and/or positron emission tomography (PET)/CT or bone scan. DLS was performed to rule out PM and to evaluate the extent and resectability of PM if seen on imaging. Sensitivity and specificity values were calculated for imaging, DLS, ACyt, and the combination of DLS and ACyt.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients with UrAC underwent DLS. ACyt was obtained in 19 patients. Four patients had suspicion of PM on imaging. In the 28 patients who were PM-negative on imaging, DLS and ACyt revealed PM in 6 (21%) patients, of whom 5 had macroscopically visible PM; 1 patient had positive ACyt without visible PM. Sensitivity of combined DLS/ACyt for the detection of PM was 91%, with a specificity of 100%, whereas sensitivity of imaging was 36%. DLS correctly predicted resectability in all patients.

CONCLUSION

Combined DLS/ACyt proved an effective tool to detect occult PM and to evaluate the extent of PM to select UrAC patients for possible treatment with CRS/HIPEC.

Repeat cytoreductive surgery with or without intraperitoneal chemotherapy for recurrent epithelial appendiceal neoplasms

Background

With recurrence rates after primary cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in excess of 50 per cent, repeat CRS is being performed increasingly, but survival outcomes have not been reported widely. This study examined the outcomes following repeat CRS for appendiceal cancer with peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM), and evaluated its feasibility and safety.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of patients who had surgery between 1996 and 2018 were analysed. Patients who underwent a single CRS procedure with or without heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) were compared with those who had multiple procedures with or without HIPEC. Perioperative morbidity and survival outcomes were analysed.

Results

Some 462 patients were reviewed, 102 of whom had repeat procedures. For high‐grade tumours, patients who had a single CRS procedure had significantly reduced overall survival (OS) compared with those who had repeat CRS (55·6 versus 90·7 months respectively; P = 0·016). For low‐grade tumours, there was no difference in OS (P = 0·153). When patients who had a single procedure were compared with those who had multiple procedures, there was no significant difference in major morbidity (P = 0·441) or in‐hospital mortality (P = 0·080). For multiple procedures, no differences were found in major morbidity (P = 0·262) or in‐hospital mortality (P = 0·502) when the first procedure was compared with the second. For low‐grade cancers, the peritoneal carcinomatosis index was a significant prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio (HR) 1·11, 95 per cent c.i. 1·05 to 1·17; P < 0·001), whereas for high‐grade cancers repeat CRS (HR 0·57, 0·33 to 0·95; P = 0·033), complete cytoreduction score (HR 1·55, 1·01 to 2·40; P = 0·046) and presence of signet ring cells (HR 2·77, 1·78 to 4·30; P < 0·001) were all significant indicators of long‐term survival.

Conclusion

In selected patients presenting with PSM from epithelial appendiceal neoplasms, repeat CRS performed in high‐volume centres could provide survival benefits.

Peritoneal mesothelioma

Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and lethal disease of the peritoneal lining, with high variability in biologic aggressiveness. Morbidity and mortality of the disease are related to progressive locoregional effects within the abdominal cavity, such as distention, pain, early satiety, and decreased oral intake that can ultimately lead to bowel obstruction and cachexia. The standard of care for patients with resectable disease remains cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC), with potential survival outcomes greater than 5 years in appropriately selected patients. Patients with inoperable MPM can be offered systemic treatment, although the disease is usually refractory to standard chemotherapic regimens. Patients with MPM should be treated at high volume centers with strong consideration for inclusion in tumor registries and clinical trials. In 2020, research will continue to explore promising genetic and immunologic targets and focus on refinement of surgical methods to optimize CRS-HIPEC approaches.

Predictors and Outcomes of Surgery in Peritoneal Mesothelioma: an Analysis of 2000 Patients from the National Cancer Database

INTRODUCTION

Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) is a rare malignancy associated with poor outcomes. Recent reports have shown longer survival with radical surgery, usually combined with intraperitoneal chemotherapy. However, surgical interventions in these patients have not been extensively studied at a population level. The objective of this retrospective cohort study is to assess the prevalence of surgical and nonsurgical interventions for DMPM patients, the influence of surgery on survival outcomes, and the associations between demographic and clinical factors with treatments and outcomes.

METHODS

This study included adult patients diagnosed with DMPM from 2003 to 2014 and registered in the National Cancer Database (NCDB). The primary outcome was overall survival. Histologically confirmed mesothelioma was defined using International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-3 codes 9050/3, 9051/3, 90523, and 9053/3 and peritoneum as primary affected organ using ICD codes C17-19, C22-24, C26, C42, C48, and C76. Relationships between demographic and clinical variables, surgical treatments, and survival outcomes were evaluated using logistic and Cox modeling and log-rank tests.

RESULTS

A total of 2062 patients were identified, of whom 1055 (51%) did not receive any surgery while 701 (34%) received radical surgery. Patients receiving radical surgery had overall survival of 38.4 months compared with 7.1 months for patients without surgery (p < 0.001) and 41.8 months in patients who received both radical surgery and systemic chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients selected for and treated with radical surgery had significantly better overall survival compared with those receiving nonsurgical treatment. Patients newly diagnosed with DMPM should be evaluated for the possibility of receiving radical surgery.

Clinical and surgical outcomes of patients with peritoneal mesothelioma discussed at a monthly national multidisciplinary team video-conference meeting

Background

Peritoneal mesothelioma (PM) is a rare primary neoplasm of the peritoneum with an increasing incidence worldwide. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has shown promise as a treatment strategy. A national PM multidisciplinary team (national PM MDT) video‐conference meeting was established in the UK and Ireland in March 2016, aiming to plan optimal treatment, record outcomes and provide evidence for the benefits of centralization. This article reports on the activities and outcomes of the first 2·5 years.

Methods

Between March 2016 and December 2018, patients with PM, referred to peritoneal malignancy centres in Basingstoke, Birmingham, Manchester and Dublin, were discussed by the national PM MDT via video‐conference. The MDT was composed of surgeons, radiologists, specialist nurses and pathologists. Patients were considered for CRS and HIPEC if considered fit for surgery and if radiological imaging suggested that complete surgical cytoreduction could be achieved. Morbidity and mortality following surgery were analysed. Survival analysis following MDT discussion was conducted.

Results

A total of 155 patients (M : F ratio 0·96) with a mean(s.d.) age of 57(17) years were discussed. To date, 22 (14·2 per cent) have had CRS and HIPEC; the median Peritoneal Cancer Index for the surgical group was 17·0. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 19 patients. Clavien–Dindo grade I–II complications occurred in 16 patients; there was no grade III–IV morbidity or 30‐day in‐hospital mortality. The median follow‐up for the whole cohort was 18·7 months, and the 2‐year survival rate from time of first review at the national PM MDT was 68·3 per cent.

Conclusion

The centralized national PM MDT was effective at selecting patients suitable for CRS and HIPEC, reporting a good outcome from patient selection.

Indications for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with cytoreductive surgery: a systematic review

The purpose of the present review was to describe evidence-based indications for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), with cytoreductive surgery (CRS), in patients with a diagnosis of mesothelioma, appendiceal (including appendiceal mucinous neoplasm), colorectal, gastric, ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma. Relevant studies were identified from a systematic MEDLINE and EMBASE search of studies published from 1985 to 2019. Studies were included if they were RCTs. If no RCTs were identified, prospective and retrospecctive comparative studies (where confounders are controlled for studies with greater than 30 patients) were included. Overall survival, progression-free survival, recurrence-free survival, adverse events and quality of life data were extracted. For patients with newly diagnosed, primary stage III epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinoma, HIPEC with CRS should be considered for those with at least stable disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy at the time of interval CRS if complete or optimal cytoreduction is achieved. There is insufficient evidence to recommend the addition of HIPEC when primary CRS is performed for patients with newly diagnosed, primary advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinoma or in those with recurrent ovarian cancer outside of a clinical trial. There is insufficient evidence to recommend HIPEC with CRS for the prevention of or for the treatment of peritoneal colorectal carcinomatosis outside of a clinical trial. There is insufficient evidence to recommend HIPEC with CRS for the prevention of or for the treatment of gastric peritoneal carcinomatosis outside of a clinical trial. There is insufficient evidence to recommend HIPEC with CRS in patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma or in those with disseminated mucinous neoplasm in the appendix as a standard of care; however, these patients should be referred to HIPEC specialty centres for assessment for treatment as part of an ongoing research protocol.

An update of peritonectomy procedures used in cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal malignancy

Background: Complete cytoreduction is acknowledged to be an effective way to achieve macroscopic tumor clearance for a variety of tumors confined to the peritoneal cavity. Recent trials have shown that surgery respecting anatomical planes results in excellent outcomes and even the chance of cure for some from what was once thought to be life-limiting disease. Objective: To describe peritonectomy procedures in the current era. Method: A thorough and systematic method for cytoreductive surgery aimed at complete surgical resection of peritoneal metastases (PMs) was described. Results: The general principles of cytoreductive surgery were set out including preoperative preparation, patient positioning and incision. Strategies for assessing disease extent and planning surgical steps were outlined and established peritonectomy procedures such as Glisson's capsulectomy, omentectomy, left and right diaphragmatic peritonectomy, lesser omentectomy, stripping of the omental bursa, and pelvic peritonectomy were described. Novel techniques such as anterior pancreatic peritonectomy, small bowel mesenteric peritonectomy and cardiophrenic lymph node dissection were explained, and illustrated with accompanying video. Conclusion: Peritoneal metastases present a challenge to the surgeon which calls for a unique skill set if optimal outcomes are to be achieved. Attempts to standardize the surgical techniques described will allow further refinement as new technological advances occur.

Two-Stage Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Diffuse Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma: Predictors of Overall Survival in an Intention-to-Treat Series

PURPOSE

Cytoreductive surgery with intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is standard of care for diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM), but there is variability among institutions in the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. Characterization of the largest series of DMPM patients treated at a single institution and identification of the demographic, disease, and treatment factors associated with overall survival were sought.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All DMPM patients who underwent initial cytoreductive surgery with the intention to undergo intraperitoneal chemotherapy and a second-look operation from 1995 to 2016 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. The primary endpoint was overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 204 DMPM patients underwent initial cytoreduction. Median overall survival was 32 months from initial cytoreduction. Independent baseline prognostic factors of improved overall survival were female sex, age < 60 years, and epithelioid histology. Independent treatment factors associated with improved overall survival were attempted resection at initial operation, residual disease < 0.5 cm at the end of the initial operation, and dwell intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Cytoreductive surgery with intraoperative and dwell intraperitoneal chemotherapy is a feasible approach for DMPM. Expanded access to these therapies may offer benefit to a larger population of patients. Demographic and operative parameters associated with overall survival in this large cohort are consistent with previous reports. In the context of this treatment protocol, dwell intraperitoneal chemotherapy is associated with longer overall survival.

Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma: Patterns of Care and Survival in the Netherlands: A Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and aggressive disease. Recently, focus has shifted toward a more aggressive and multimodal treatment approach. This study aimed to assess the patterns of care and survival for MPM patients in the Netherlands on a nationwide basis.

METHODS

The records of patients with a diagnosis of MPM from 1993 to 2016 were retrieved from the Dutch Cancer Registry. Data regarding diagnosis, staging, treatment, and survival were extracted. Cox regression analyses and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to study overall survival.

RESULTS

Between 1993 and 2016, MPM was diagnosed for 566 patients. Overall, the prognosis was very poor (24% 1-year survival). The most common morphologic subtype was the epithelioid subtype (88%), followed by the biphasic (8%) and sarcomatoid (4%) subtypes. Surgical treatment has become more common in recent years, which most likely has resulted in improved survival rates. In this study, improved survival was independently associated with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.55) and surgery with adjuvant systemic chemotherapy (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.23-0.48). Nonetheless, most patients (67%) do not receive any form of anti-cancer treatment.

CONCLUSION

This study indicated that MPM still is a rare and fatal disease. The survival rates in the Netherlands have improved slightly in the past decade, most likely due to more aggressive treatment approaches and increased use of surgery. However, most patients still do not receive cancer-directed treatment. To improve MPM management, and ultimately survival, care should be centralized in expert medical centers.

Prophylactic Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for Gastric Cancer-A Systematic Review

Survival after potentially curative treatment of gastric cancer remains low, mostly due to peritoneal recurrence. This descriptive review gives an overview of available comparative studies concerning prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for patients with gastric cancer with neither clinically evident metastases nor positive peritoneal cytology who undergo potentially curative gastrectomy. After searching the PubMed, Embase, CDSR, CENTRAL and ASCO meeting library, a total of 11 studies were included comparing surgery plus prophylactic HIPEC versus surgery alone (SA): three randomised controlled trials and eight non-randomised comparative studies, involving 1145 patients. Risk of bias was high in most of the studies. Morbidity after prophylactic HIPEC was 17-60% compared to 25-43% after SA. Overall survival was 32-35 months after prophylactic HIPEC and 22-28 months after SA. The 5-year survival rates were 39-87% after prophylactic HIPEC and 17-61% after SA, which was statistically significant in three studies. Peritoneal recurrence occurred in 7-27% in the HIPEC group, compared to 14-45% after SA. This review tends to demonstrate that prophylactic HIPEC for gastric cancer can be performed safely, may prevent peritoneal recurrence and may prolong survival. However, studies were heterogeneous and outdated, which emphasizes the need for well-designed trials conducted according to current standards.