Differential Crizotinib Response Duration Among ALK Fusion Variants in ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Unique molecular features and clinical outcomes in young patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring ALK fusion genes

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine the molecular features and clinical outcomes of young patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring ALK fusion genes.

METHODS

We interrogated the genomic profile of 1652 patients with lung cancer who underwent targeted next-generation sequencing to screen for candidate oncogenic drivers using histological specimens acquired from January 2016 to December 2018.

RESULTS

ALK fusions were identified in 101 NSCLC patients, and 52 of them were diagnosed before the age of 50 years (52/367, 14.2%). Of the 52 patients with early-onset disease, 22 (42.3%) were male and 43 (82.7%) never smoked; the median patient age was 44 years (range 28-50 years). The most frequently occurring ALK fusion partner was EML4, which was identified in 80.8% (42/52) of young patients. Compared to the older patients, patients with early-onset disease were more likely to harbor EML4-ALK variant 1 (38.5% vs. 14.3%; P = 0.007). We also identified rare ALK fusions, including CHRNA7-ALK, TACR1-ALK, HIP1-ALK, DYSF-ALK and ITGAV-ALK, in patients with early-onset disease, and patients with these fusions responded well to crizotinib treatment. A statistically significant difference was observed in progression-free survival (PFS) between the young patients and older patients who received crizotinib as the first-line therapy (17.5 months vs 9.0 months, P = 0.048). However, the median PFS of young patients harboring concurrent TP53 mutations was only 6.2 months.

CONCLUSION

Unique genetic characteristics were found in ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients with early disease onset, and these patients responded better to crizotinib and had longer PFS compared to patients with later disease onset. However, patients with concomitant TP53 mutations may not have a significant response to treatment.

Fusion transcripts: Unexploited vulnerabilities in cancer?

Gene fusions are an important class of mutations in several cancer types and include genomic rearrangements that fuse regulatory or coding elements from two different genes. Analysis of the genetics of cancers harboring fusion oncogenes and the proteins they encode have enhanced cancer diagnosis and in some cases patient treatment. However, the effect of the complex structure of fusion genes on the biogenesis of the resulting chimeric transcripts they express is not well studied. There are two potential RNA-related vulnerabilities inherent to fusion-driven cancers: (a) the processing of the fusion precursor messenger RNA (pre-mRNA) to the mature mRNA and (b) the mature mRNA. In this study, we discuss the effects that the genetic organization of fusion oncogenes has on the generation of translatable mature RNAs and the diversity of fusion transcripts expressed in different cancer subtypes, which can fundamentally influence both tumorigenesis and treatment. We also discuss functional genomic approaches that can be utilized to identify proteins that mediate the processing of fusion pre-mRNAs. Furthermore, we assert that an enhanced understanding of fusion transcript biogenesis and the diversity of the chimeric RNAs present in fusion-driven cancers will increase the likelihood of successful application of RNA-based therapies in this class of tumors. This article is categorized under: RNA Processing > RNA Editing and Modification RNA Processing > Splicing Regulation/Alternative Splicing RNA in Disease and Development > RNA in Disease.

Rapid detection and genotyping of ALK fusion variants by adapter multiplex PCR and high-resolution melting analysis

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion is a promising predictive biomarker of ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (ALK-TKI) treatment. Furthermore, different fusion variants correlate to different ALK-TKIs responses. Although variant identification assists in treatment direction, most ALK detection assays do not genotype different fusion variants. We developed a high-resolution melting (HRM) assay to rapidly detect ALK fusions and automatically distinguish at least 20 fusion variants in one tube. Adapter multiplex PCR was designed to amplify ALK fusion variants and the reference gene GAPDH. After HRM, negative derivative curves showed a low temperature GAPDH peak, and if an ALK fusion was present, a high temperature peak from the ALK segment and variably a middle temperature part associated with the fusion partner. Selected regions of the second derivative curves were analyzed to extract features (∆T_m, PTS/ITS, H₁/H₂) that define two curve types (monotonic and non-monotonic). Synthetic samples of 20 ALK fusion variants were used to train a quadratic discriminate analysis model, and the accuracy was 97.06% (66/68) and 85.71% (144/162) for monotonic and non-monotonic variants, respectively. The limit of detection of the assay was 1%. The analytical sensitivity of genotyping was 1 and 5% for monotonic and non-monotonic variants, respectively. In a blinded study, we detected ALK fusion from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded lung cancer samples with a 100% 47) and genotyping /47) and genotyping (7/7). Multiplex adapter HRM is a simple, fast, and sensitive way of ALK fusion detection and genotyping. Automatic genotyping with parameters extracted from second derivative curves is a promising method that may be applicable to other types of gene variants detected by HRM.

Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK)-positive Tumors: Clinical, Radiographic and Molecular Profiles, and Uncommon Sites of Metastases in Patients With Lung Adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements are observed in about 4% to 8% non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). ALK+ tumors have been associated with increased pleural and pericardial disease. Our primary objective was to determine the uncommon sites of metastasis of ALK+ NSCLC. Secondary objectives included study of coexisting mutations and factors impacting survival of ALK+ NSCLC.

METHODS

All patients with metastatic ALK+ NSCLC at the City of Hope Cancer Center in Duarte, California from 2010 to 2017 were selected for retrospective chart review. The demographic variables were collected. The molecular statuses of patients were evaluated through commercially available platforms for next-generation sequencing. Three-dimensional volumetric images were generated for the primary lesion and different sites of metastasis.

RESULTS

Sixty two patients with ALK+ NSCLC were identified from 2010 to 2017. The median age was 59 with 36 (58%) female individuals and only 20 (32%) smokers. Twenty four patients had uncommon sites of metastasis which were thyroid, soft tissue, chest and abdominal wall, spleen, peritoneum, omentum, kidney, and ovary. Common characteristics of the primary lesions were right upper lobe location (N=23 [37%]), oval shape (N=22 [35%]), irregular margins (N=26 [42%]), solid lesions (N=27 [44%]), presence of pleural contact or effusion (N=22 [35%]). Twenty four patients had next-generation sequencing testing which showed coexisting mutations such as TP53 (N=8), EGFR (N=5), KRAS (N=3). Patients with uncommon sites of metastasis had a decreased median survival compared with common sites (39 vs. 82 m, P=0.046).

CONCLUSION

In NSCLC, ALK rearrangements may not be mutually exclusive mutations and can present with unique radiographic patterns. Patients with uncommon sites of metastasis may have worse outcomes.

Interpretation of ceritinib clinical trial results and future combination therapy strategies for ALK-rearranged NSCLC

Introduction: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for approximately 85% of all lung cancer cases. The continued advancement of DNA sequencing technology and the discovery of multiple specific driver mutations underlying many cases of NSCLC are moving clinical intervention toward a more targeted approach. Here we focus on anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), a member of the receptor tyrosine kinase family, as an oncogenic driver in NSCLC. The ALK gene is rearranged in 3-7% of NSCLCs, and targeted inhibition of ALK is a viable therapy option.Areas covered: We discuss the available treatment options for ALK-positive NSCLC with an emphasis on the second-generation ALK inhibitor ceritinib. We also discuss practical treatment strategies and possible strategies to overcome or delay resistance to ALK inhibitors.Expert opinion: With a robust treatment armamentarium for patients with ALK-positive NSCLC, emphasis has shifted to optimizing individualized treatment strategies to further enhance outcomes for these patients.

[Therapeutic strategies in advanced ALK positive non-small cell lung cancer]

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement is a therapeutically targetable oncogenic driver found in 5% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The objective of this paper is to synthesise current knowledge on ALK rearrangement and its impact on the management of advanced NSCLC. Several inhibitors of the tyrosine kinase of ALK (crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib) have been approved as first line therapies in patients with advanced ALK positive NSCLC, which are associated with a better median progression-free survival than conventional chemotherapy. Unfortunately, the emergence of drug resistance leads to tumor progression. In patients with oligoprogressive disease if local ablative therapy can be effected, continuing with the same ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor is one option. In patients with progression, clinicians may consider switching to another therapy. Rebiopsy of the tumor or liquid biopsy could be attempted to identify the mechanisms of resistance and to customize ALK-target therapy. The emergence of crizotinib drug resistance has prompted the development of next generation drugs including ceritinb, alectinib, brigatinib and lorlatinib. The ability to quickly develop targeted therapies against specific oncogenic drivers will require close co-operation between pathologists, pulmonologists and oncologists in the future to keep pace with drug discoveries and to define optimal therapeutic strategies.

Monitoring Therapeutic Response and Resistance: Analysis of Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients With ALK+ Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Despite initial effectiveness of ALK receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with ALK+ NSCLC, therapeutic resistance will ultimately develop. Serial tracking of genetic alterations detected in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can be an informative strategy to identify response and resistance. This study evaluated the utility of analyzing ctDNA as a function of response to ensartinib, a potent second-generation ALK TKI.

METHODS

Pre-treatment plasma was collected from 76 patients with ALK+ NSCLC who were ALK TKI-naive or had received prior ALK TKI, and analyzed for specific genetic alterations. Longitudinal plasma samples were analyzed from a subset (n = 11) of patients. Analysis of pre-treatment tumor biopsy specimens from 22 patients was compared with plasma.

RESULTS

Disease-associated genetic alterations were detected in 74% (56 of 76) of patients, the most common being EML4-ALK. Concordance of ALK fusion between plasma and tissue was 91% (20 of 22 blood and tissue samples). Twenty-four ALK kinase domain mutations were detected in 15 patients, all had previously received an ALK TKI; G1269A was the most prevalent (4 of 24). Patients with a detectable EML4-ALK variant 1 (V1) fusion had improved response (9 of 17 patients; 53%) to ensartinib compared to patients with EML4-ALK V3 fusion (one of seven patients; 14%). Serial changes in ALK alterations were observed during therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical utility of ctDNA was shown, both at pre-treatment by identifying a potential subgroup of ALK+ NSCLC patients who may derive more benefit from ensartinib and longitudinally by tracking resistance. Prospective application of this technology may translate to improved outcomes for NSCLC patients treated with ALK TKIs.

Translating Systems Medicine Into Clinical Practice: Examples From Pulmonary Medicine With Genetic Disorders, Infections, Inflammations, Cancer Genesis, and Treatment Implication of Molecular Alterations in Non-small-cell Lung Cancers and Personalized Medicine

Non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC) represent 85% of all lung cancers, with adenocarcinoma as the most common subtype. Since the 2000's, the discovery of molecular alterations including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements together with the development of specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has facilitated the development of personalized medicine in the management of this disease. This review focuses on the biology of molecular alterations in NSCLC as well as the diagnostic tools and therapeutic alternatives available for each targetable alteration. Rapid and sensitive methods are essential to detect gene alterations, using tumor tissue biopsies or liquid biopsies. Massive parallel sequencing or Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) allows to simultaneously analyze numerous genes from relatively low amounts of DNA. The detection of oncogenic fusions can be conducted using fluorescence in situ hybridization, reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, immunohistochemistry, or NGS. EGFR mutations, ALK and ROS1 rearrangements, MET (MET proto-oncogenereceptor tyrosine kinase), BRAF (B-Raf proto-oncogen serine/threonine kinase), NTRK (neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase), and RET (ret proto-oncogene) alterations are described with their respective TKIs, either already authorized or still in development. We have herein paid particular attention to the mechanisms of resistance to EGFR and ALK-TKI. As a wealth of diagnostic tools and personalized treatments are currently under development, a close collaboration between molecular biologists, pathologists, and oncologists is crucial.

Molecular findings reveal possible resistance mechanisms in a patient with ALK-rearranged lung cancer: a case report and literature review

Background: Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is recognised as a particularly heterogeneous disease, encompassing a wide spectrum of distinct molecular subtypes. With increased understanding of disease biology and mechanisms of progression, treatment of NSCLC has made remarkable progress in the past two decades. Molecular testing is considered the hallmark for the diagnosis and treatment of NSCLC, with liquid biopsies being more and more often applied in the clinical setting during the recent years. Rearrangement of the ALK gene which results in the generation of fusion oncogenes is a common molecular event in NSCLCs. Among ALK fusion transcripts, EML4-ALK fusion is frequently observed and can be targeted with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). However, acquired resistance and disease progression in many cases are inevitable.

Method: Here, we present the case of a patient with NSCLC treated with TKIs, in which molecular profiling of the tumour was performed with different methods of tissue and plasma testing at each disease progression. A review of the literature was further conducted to offer insights into the resistance mechanisms of ALK-rearranged NSCLC.

Conclusions: Based on the results, the EML4-ALK fusion initially detected in tumour tissue was preserved throughout the course of the disease. Two additional ALK mutations were later detected in the tissue and plasma and are likely to have caused resistance to the administered TKIs. Continued research into the mechanisms of acquired resistance is required in order to increase the benefit of the patients treated with targeted ALK TKIs.

Targeted RNA-sequencing assays: a step forward compared to FISH and IHC techniques?

Introduction

ALK and ROS1 rearrangements are molecular targets of several tyrosine kinase inhibitors. RNA‐sequencing approaches are regarded as the new standard for fusion gene detection, representing an alternative to standard immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques.

Patients and Methods

We aimed to compare two recent amplicon‐based RNA‐sequencing techniques: FusionPlex^® Alk Ret Ros1 v2 Kit (Archer^®) with FHS‐003Z‐12—Human Lung Cancer Panel (Qiagen^®) and assessed the accuracy of the data for therapy management. Thirty‐seven formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded non‐small cell carcinoma (NSCC) lesions initially explored by IHC and FISH were selected for RNA‐sequencing analysis.

Results

Qiagen^® and Archer^® kits produced similar results and correctly identified 85.1% (23/27) and 81.5% (22/27) of IHC/FISH ALK‐ and ROS1‐positive samples, respectively, and 100% (6/6) of the negative samples. With regard to the ambiguous IHC‐positive/FISH‐negative cases, RNA‐sequencing confirmed 75% (3/4) of the FISH conclusion. Although not statistically significant, patients with common EML4‐ALK variants presented shorter overall survival and progression‐free survival compared with patients harboring rare variants.

Conclusion

Our findings assessed the implementation of RNA‐sequencing approaches to explore ALK and ROS1 rearrangements from formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded samples. We highlighted the similarities between Qiagen^® and Archer^® kits in terms of handling time, cost, and outcomes. We confirmed the feasibility of molecular testing in routine organization and its possible use not only as an alternative for standard IHC and FISH techniques, but as a supplementary technique helping to classify discrepant cases.

Prognostic significance of anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangement in patients with completely resected lung adenocarcinoma

Background

Reports of the prognostic significance of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement in early stage lung adenocarcinoma have been contradictory. This study aimed to identify the associations of ALK rearrangement with clinicopathologic features and prognosis in patients with surgically resected stage I-IIIA lung adenocarcinoma.

Methods

Analysis of ALK status was performed by a fully-automated immunochemistry assay (with rabbit monoclonal Ventana D5F3 antibody) in tissue sections of 2,103 patients with surgically-resected stage I-IIIA lung adenocarcinoma. ALK positive patients were matched with negative patients in a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching (PSM). Clinical outcomes were assessed by disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after surgery. Initial recurrence pattern was also investigated according to ALK status.

Results

Among 2,103 stage I-IIIA lung adenocarcinoma cases, 81 (3.9%) were ALK positive. ALK positivity was significantly associated with younger age (P<0.001), solid predominant adenocarcinoma (P<0.001), variants of invasive adenocarcinoma (P<0.001), higher frequency of pleura invasion (P=0.040), smaller tumor size (P=0.014), mediastinal lymph node involvement (N2; P<0.001) and later pathologic stage (IIIA; P=0.001). In the match cohort, ALK positivity was not associated with DFS [hazard ratio (HR), 0.58; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.33-1.03, P=0.063] or OS (HR, 0.61; 95% CI: 0.22-1.67, P=0.334). Lymph node involvement (HR: 5.36, 95% CI, 3.01-9.65, P<0.001) and solid predominant adenocarcinoma subtype (HR, 2.02; 95% CI: 1.07-3.79; P=0.029) were the independent prognostic factors of inferior DFS, and lymph node involvement was the independent prognostic factors of worse OS (HR, 6.61; 95% CI: 2.43-17.94; P<0.001). ALK positive patients had a higher risk of developing tumor recurrence in liver (P=0.043).

Conclusions

ALK rearrangement was not an independent prognostic factor in stage I-IIIA lung adenocarcinoma patients but leaded to a higher risk of developing recurrence in liver.

The Impact of Clinical Factors, ALK Fusion Variants, and BIM Polymorphism on Crizotinib-Treated Advanced EML4-ALK Rearranged Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Patients' clinical factors and genetics factors such as anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion variants and BIM (Bcl-2-like 11) polymorphism were reported to be associated with clinical outcome in crizotinib-treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the results were still controversial. We analyzed outcome of 54 patients with known ALK fusion variants who received crizotinib for advanced NSCLC. Thirty of them had successful BIM polymorphism analysis and 6 (20%) had a BIM deletion. Multivariate Cox regression analysis found that previous anticancer therapy [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.35, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04–1.76 for each additional line of therapy, p = 0.025] and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≥2 (aHR 8.35, 95% CI, 1.52–45.94, p = 0.015) were independent factors for progression-free survival (PFS). Only ECOG performance status ≥2 (aHR 7.20, 95% CI, 1.27–40.79, p = 0.026) was an independent factor for overall survival (OS). Neither ALK fusion variants nor the presence of a BIM deletion was associated with crizotinib PFS or OS. After adjusting with clinical factors, different ALK variants and BIM polymorphism might not be independent factors for crizotinib PFS or OS in advanced NSCLC with ALK rearrangement.

The prevalence of EML4-ALK variants in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To investigate the prevalence of EML4-ALK variants in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Materials & methods: Database of Pubmed, Embase, Medline and Cochrane Library were searched systematically to April 2018. Results: A total of 39 articles including 1903 NSCLC patients with ALK positive were recruited. The overall pooled prevalence for EML4-ALK variant 1 to 3 was 81.84% (95% CI: 76.68-86.99%), ranging from 86.64% tested by RT-PCR to 70.85% tested by other methods (p = 0.00). Subgroup analysis showed that the pooled prevalences of variant 1, 2 and 3 were 40.38% (95% CI: 34.83-45.93%), 6.59% (95% CI: 4.27-8.91%) and 26.54% (95% CI: 20.89-32.2%), respectively. Conclusion: This present study provides the exact prevalence of EML4-ALK rearrangement in different variants for NSCLC patients with ALK positive.

Long-term complete response in a patient with postoperative recurrent ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma treated with crizotinib: A case report

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements are identified in approximately 5% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite initial dramatic responses to ALK inhibitors, the majority of patients relapse within 1 year, owing to the development of resistance. Herein we present a case of variant type 2 ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma recurrence with multiple lung metastasis that maintained complete response over 5 years with crizotinib, which is the first approved ALK inhibitor. The efficacy of crizotinib may vary among ALK fusion variants and thus, variant type may represent an important factor in guiding the treatment strategy for ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma.

Feasibility of liquid biopsy using plasma and platelets for detection of anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangements in non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using tumor tissue is the gold standard for detection of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, this method often is not repeatable due to difficulties in the acquisition of tumor tissues. Blood-based liquid biopsy using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is expected to be useful to overcome this limitation. Here, we investigated the feasibility of liquid biopsy using plasma and platelets for detection of ALK rearrangement and prediction of ALK inhibitor treatment outcomes.

METHODS

ALK-FISH assays were performed in 1128 tumor specimens of NSCLC between January 2015 and June 2018. We retrospectively analyzed formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues from previously confirmed FISH-positive (n = 199) and -negative (n = 920) cases. We recruited patients who had available tissue specimens and agreed to venous sampling. RNA was extracted from FFPE blocks, plasma, and platelets. Fusion RNA of echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4)-ALK was detected by quantitative PCR.

RESULTS

Thirty-three FISH-positive and 28 FISH-negative patients were enrolled. In validation, data compared with FISH, RT-PCR using FFPE tissues showed 54.5% sensitivity, 78.6% specificity, and 75.5% accuracy. Liquid biopsy had higher sensitivity (78.8%), specificity (89.3%) and accuracy (83.6%). Higher positivity for liquid biopsy was shown in subgroups with delayed (≥ 6 months from diagnosis) blood sampling (plasma, 85.7%; platelets, 87.0%). In 26 patients treated with crizotinib, the platelet-positive subgroup showed longer median duration of treatment (7.2 versus 1.5 months), longer median progression-free survival (5.7 months versus 1.7 months), a higher overall response rate (70.6% versus 11.1%), and a higher disease control rate (88.2% versus 44.4%) than the platelet-negative subgroup.

CONCLUSION

Liquid biopsy could have applications in the diagnosis of ALK-positive NSCLC, even when using RT-PCR, and platelets can be useful for predicting treatment outcomes of ALK inhibitors.

Characterization of acquired receptor tyrosine-kinase fusions as mechanisms of resistance to EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors

Purpose: Responses to EGFR-targeted therapy are generally temporary, due to inevitable drug resistance. The prevalence and characteristics of receptor tyrosine–kinase (RTK) fusion as acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine–kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are rarely investigated.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed genomic profiling data of 3873 EGFR (exons 18–21)-mutant lung cancer patients with more than once next-generation sequencing detection. A total of 16 patients who acquired RTK fusions during EGFR-TKI treatment with paired pre- and post-EGFR-TKI samples were identified. Their treatment history was collected.

Results: Newly acquired RTK fusions during EGFR-TKI treatment included RET (n=6, 37.5%), ALK (n=5, 31.3%), NTRK1 (n=4, 25.0%), ROS1 (n=1, 6.3%), and FGFR3 (n=1, 6.3%). All RET and EML4–ALK fusions were uncommon variants of KIF5B-RET and E2:A20 (V5), respectively. Interestingly, RET fusion occurred only after osimertinib treatment, and contributed to drug resistance in 50% (6 of 12) of patients treated with osimertinib, indicating that fusions had different prevalence when functioning as resistance mechanisms to EGFR TKIs. Moreover, we found that in all patients developing drug resistance to EGFR TKIs due to fusion emergence (n=16), those that had a treatment history of third-generation EGFR TKIs accounted for 75% (n=12).

Conclusion: We have extended the current knowledge of resistance mechanisms to EGFR TKIs in non-small-cell lung cancer. Detection of RTK fusions should be included in genomic profiling panels to uncover potential resistance mechanisms of EGFR TKIs, which might inform therapeutic strategies, such as combination-therapy approaches, to circumvent tumorigenesis.

Analysis of the Genomic Landscape in ALK+ NSCLC Patients Identifies Novel Aberrations Associated with Clinical Outcomes

Rearrangements in the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene are found in approximately 5% of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Here, we present a comprehensive genomic landscape of 11 patients with ALK+ NSCLC and investigate its relationship with response to crizotinib. Using whole-exome sequencing and RNAseq data, we identified four rare ALK fusion partners (HIP1, GCC2, ERC1, and SLC16A7) and one novel partner (CEP55). At the mutation level, TP53 was the most frequently mutated gene and was only observed in patients with the shortest progression-free survival (PFS). Of note, only 4% of the genes carrying mutations are present in more than 1 patient. Analysis of somatic copy number aberrations (SCNA) demonstrated that a gain in EML4 was associated with longer PFS, and a loss of ALK or gain in EGFR was associated with shorter PFS. This study is the first to report a comprehensive view of the ALK+ NSCLC copy number landscape and to identify SCNA regions associated with clinical outcome. Our data show the presence of TP53 mutation as a strong prognostic indication of poor clinical response in ALK+ NSCLC. Furthermore, new and rare ALK fusion partners were observed in this cohort, expanding our knowledge in ALK+ NSCLC.

Validation of a Next-Generation Sequencing Assay Targeting RNA for the Multiplexed Detection of Fusion Transcripts and Oncogenic Isoforms

CONTEXT.—

Next-generation sequencing is a high-throughput method for detecting genetic abnormalities and providing prognostic and therapeutic information for patients with cancer. Oncogenic fusion transcripts are among the various classifications of genetic abnormalities present in tumors and are typically detected clinically with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). However, FISH probes only exist for a limited number of targets, do not provide any information about fusion partners, cannot be multiplex, and have been shown to be limited in specificity for common targets such as ALK.

OBJECTIVE.—

To validate an anchored multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based panel for the detection of fusion transcripts in a university hospital-based clinical molecular diagnostics laboratory.

DESIGN.—

We used 109 unique clinical specimens to validate a custom panel targeting 104 exon boundaries from 17 genes involved in fusions in solid tumors. The panel can accept as little as 100 ng of total nucleic acid from PreservCyt-fixed tissue, and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens with as little as 10% tumor nuclei.

RESULTS.—

Using FISH as the gold standard, this assay has a sensitivity of 88.46% and a specificity of 95.83% for the detection of fusion transcripts involving ALK, RET, and ROS1 in lung adenocarcinomas. Using a validated next-generation sequencing assay as the orthogonal gold standard for the detection of EGFR variant III (EGFRvIII) in glioblastomas, the assay is 92.31% sensitive and 100% specific.

CONCLUSIONS.—

This multiplexed assay is tumor and fusion partner agnostic and will provide clinical utility in therapy selection for patients with solid tumors.

Targeting SLMAP-ALK-a novel gene fusion in lung adenocarcinoma

Assessment of ALK gene rearrangements is strongly recommended by the Molecular Testing Guideline for Selection of Lung Cancer Patients proposed by IASLC, AMP, and CAP at the time of diagnosis for patients with advanced stage disease. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with ALK gene rearrangements or the resulting fusion proteins have been, for the most part, successfully targeted with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The most frequent rearrangement, the EML4-ALK oncogenic fusion, has more than 10 distinct variants, each with a discrete breakpoint in EML4. Recent studies have suggested that EML4-ALK variants may have differential responses to TKIs. Additionally, non-EML4-ALK fusions that result from ALK rearrangements with diverse 5′ partners could possibly have varied biologic and clinical implications in their therapeutic responses and outcomes of patients with NSCLC. Existing literature documents at least 20 non-EML4 fusion partners for ALK, and the clinical responsiveness to crizotinib ranges from increased sensitivity to resistance. This underscores the importance of identifying the precise 5′ fusion partner to ALK before initiation of therapy. Herein we report the identification of a novel SLMAP-ALK fusion in a patient with NSCLC.

Clinical features and therapeutic options in non-small cell lung cancer patients with concomitant mutations of EGFR, ALK, ROS1, KRAS or BRAF

Background

Although oncogenic driver mutations were thought to be mutually exclusive in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), certain tumors harbor co‐occurring mutations and represent a rare molecular subtype. The evaluation of the clinical features and therapeutic response associated with this NSCLC subtype will be vital for understanding the heterogeneity of treatment response and improving the management of these patients.

Methods

This retrospective study included 3774 samples from patients diagnosed with NSCLC. All samples were screened for EGFR, ALK, ROS1, KRAS, and BRAF mutation using the amplification‐refractory mutation system. The relationship between concomitant driver mutations and clinicopathologic characteristics, and patient clinical outcomes were evaluated.

Results

Sixty‐three (1.7%) samples had more than one driver gene mutation. Among these, 43 were coalterations with an EGFR mutation, 20 with an ALK rearrangement, and eight with an ROS1 rearrangement. Except for ROS1 concomitant mutations that were more frequent in male patients (87.5%, P = 0.020), the clinicopathological features of the concomitant mutation patients were not significantly different from those harboring a single EGFR, ALK, or ROS1 mutation. Furthermore, first‐line EGFR‐TKI treatment did not significantly improve the progression‐free survival (PFS) of patients harboring EGFR concomitant mutation, compared to patients harboring a single EGFR mutation. However, for EGFR concomitant mutation patients, TKI therapy was more effective than chemotherapy (median PFS of 10.8 vs 5.2 months, P = 0.023). Lastly, KRAS mutations did not influence the EGFR‐TKI therapy treatment effect.

Conclusion

In this study, concomitant mutations were found in 1.7% of the NSCLC. EGFR‐TKI therapy was more effective than chemotherapy for patients harboring EGFR concomitant mutation, and ROS1 concomitant mutations were more frequent in male patients. For patients harboring coalterations with an ALK or ROS1 rearrangement, we should be cautious when considering the therapeutic options.

Clinical features and outcomes of ALK rearranged non-small cell lung cancer with primary resistance to crizotinib

Background

Crizotinib is associated with a favorable survival benefit in patients with ALK‐positive non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, a subset of patients harboring ALK rearrangement shows a poor response.

Methods

We collected the clinical features and survival outcomes of 28 primary‐resistant responders (PRR) with progression‐free survival (PFS) of < 3 months on crizotinib and compared these with 78 long‐term responders (LTR) that achieved > 24 months PFS (control).

Results

Primary resistance was observed in 6.5% of the patients. The median PFS of the PRR and LTR groups was 1.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70–1.73) and 47.0 months (95% CI 34.39–59.64), respectively. A better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score was significantly associated with longer PFS (odds ratio 0.06, 95% CI 0.01–0.33; P = 0.001). The median overall survival (OS) of the PRR group was 8.4 months (95% CI 3.47–13.42) and crizotinib as first‐line treatment was an independent predictive factor for survival outcome (P = 0.005). Patients administered ALK‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors after crizotinib progression had significantly longer survival than the PRR group treated with best supportive care (P = 0.007), but no significant difference was found between ALK‐tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment and single chemotherapy (P = 0.944).

Conclusion

Patients with primary resistance to crizotinib displayed unfavorable survival outcomes and the underlying mechanism cannot be identified in clinical features. Nevertheless, next‐generation ALK inhibitors and chemotherapy after crizotinib progression could confer a therapeutic and survival benefit in this population.

Different Types of ROS1 Fusion Partners Yield Comparable Efficacy to Crizotinib

ROS1 rearrangements define a distinct molecular subset of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which can be treated effectively with crizotinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting ROS1/MET/ALK rearrangements. Diverse efficacy was observed in ROS1-rearranged NSCLC patients. Because of its rareness, very limited studies have investigated the correlation between different fusion partners and response to crizotinib. In this study, we retrospectively screened 6,235 advanced NSCLC patients (stage IIIB to IV) from five hospitals and identified 106 patients with ROS1 rearrangements based on either plasma or tumor tissue testing using capture-based targeted sequencing. The most frequently occurring fusion partners included cluster of differentiation 74 (CD74), ezrin (EZR), syndecan 4 (SDC4), and tropomyosin 3 (TPM3), occurring in 49.1%, 17%, 14.2%, and 4.7% of patients, respectively. Among them, 38 patients were treated with crizotinib. Seventeen patients were treatment naive, and the remaining were previously treated with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. Collectively, there was no significant difference among patients with various types of ROS1 fusion partners in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Patients who were treated with crizotinib as first-line therapy showed comparable PFS (p = 0.26) to patients who were previously treated with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. For treatment-naive patients, patients with low baseline ROS1 allelic fraction (AF) had a statistically significant longer OS than those with high ROS1 AF (184 vs. 110 days, p = 0.048). Collectively, our study demonstrates that ROS1⁺ patients with various fusion partners show comparable efficacy to crizotinib.

Next-Generation Sequencing for Genotyping of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Samples in Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) can obtain a small amount of specimen. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and robustness of using EBUS-EBNA samples to perform capture-based targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS).

METHODS

Tissue samples from patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer were collected by EBUS-TBNA and were formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded. Three representative genes, EGFR, ALK, and ROS1, were examined by amplification refractory mutation system polymerase chain reaction, immunohistochemistry, and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The remaining samples were processed with NGS assay with a 56-gene panel. Classic driver mutations detected by NGS were verified by conventional methods.

RESULTS

Of the 85 samples from patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, 77 were performed successfully with all assays. Forty-one mutations in EGFR, ALK, and ROS1 were detected in both conventional methods and NGS, representing a 100% concordance. In contrast, four EGFR mutations detected by NGS were not covered in the targeted regions of amplification refractory mutation system polymerase chain reaction, leading to a negative call in these patients. Altogether, NGS detected 12 additional variants, including six KRAS mutations, one BRAF mutation, one RET fusion, one MET amplification concurrent with EGFR L858R, one KRAS amplification together with EGFR 19del, and one ERBB2 amplification. The mean number of needle passes per lymph node was 5.2 in samples successfully applied in all assays.

CONCLUSIONS

NGS assay can be successfully conducted with limited tissue samples obtained from EBUS-TBNA. Compared with conventional methods, NGS assay provides more comprehensive information on genetic alterations in tumors, which greatly assists therapeutic decision making for advanced lung cancer.

Advances in Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Based on Accurate Molecular Typing

The essence of precision medicine is to achieve the goal of “individualized treatment” through genotyping of patients and targeted therapy. At present, the pathogenic genes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been studied most thoroughly and targeted therapy based on genotyping has been the most successful. This paper focuses on the precision treatment of NSCLC based on genotyping, comparing gene detection methods and summarize the latest progress of NSCLC immunotherapy.

NCOA1-ALK: a novel ALK rearrangement in one lung adenocarcinoma patient responding to crizotinib treatment

The heterogeneity of ALK tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) responses poses a puzzling question to clinicians. Different variants of ALK rearrangements might be one of the mechanisms explaining this phenomenon. Therefore, identifying specific fusion forms is crucial to clinical practice. This case report assesses the clinical efficacy of an ALK-TKI in a new ALK-rearrangement variant. Next-generation sequencing was performed in tumor tissue of one lung adenocarcinoma patient, and one new fusion form of an ALK rearrangement (NCOA1–ALK) was identified. This patient had progression-free survival >18 months with crizotinib treatment. Our findings provide valuable information about responses to crizotinib in patients with this form of ALK rearrangement and better understanding of ALK-TKI applications.

Resistance to molecularly targeted therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer

The discovery of oncogenic driver gene mutations, including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion, ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) fusion, and ret proto-oncogene (RET) fusion, has led to the development of molecularly targeted therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This therapy has changed the standard of care for NSCLC. Despite the dramatic response to molecularly targeted therapy, almost all patients ultimately develop resistance to the drugs. To understand the mechanisms of resistance to molecularly targeted agents, it is essential to understand the molecular pathways of NSCLC. Here, we review the mechanisms of resistance to molecularly targeted therapy and discuss strategies to overcome drug resistance.

Prospective analysis of liquid biopsies of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients after progression to targeted therapies using GeneReader NGS platform

Background

In a significant percentage of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, tumor tissue is unavailable or insufficient for genetic analyses at time to progression. We prospectively analyzed the appearance of genetic alterations associated with resistance in liquid biopsies of advanced NSCLC patients progressing to targeted therapies using the NGS platform.

Methods

A total of 24 NSCLC patients were included in the study, 22 progressing to tyrosine kinase inhibitors and two to other treatments. Liquid biopsies samples were obtained and analyzed using the GeneRead^TM QIAact Lung DNA UMI Panel, designed to enrich specific target regions and containing 550 variant positions in 19 selected genes frequently altered in lung cancer tumors. Previously, a retrospective validation of the panel was performed in clinical samples.

Results

Of the 21 patients progressing to tyrosine kinase inhibitors with valid results in liquid biopsy, NGS analysis identified a potential mechanism of resistance in 12 (57%). The most common were acquired mutations in ALK and EGFR, which appeared in 8/21 patients (38%), followed by amplifications in 5/21 patients (24%), and KRAS mutations in one patient (5%). Loss of the p.T790M was also identified in two patients progressing to osimertinib. Three of the 21 (14%) patients presented two or more concomitant alterations associated with resistance. Finally, an EGFR amplification was found in the only patient progressing to immunotherapy included in the study.

Conclusions

NGS analysis in liquid biopsies of patients progressing to targeted therapies using the GeneReader platform is feasible and can help the oncologist to make treatment decisions.

ALK testing methods: is there a winner or loser?

INTRODUCTION

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) is one of the most attractive molecular targets for the treatment of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Treatment with ALK inhibitors is recognized as the standard-of-care for patients with ALK gene rearrangements, but it is important to appropriately select patients who will benefit from such treatment. Areas covered: In this article, we review the evidence regarding ALK testing. Immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) are the representative methods for detecting ALK gene fusions. Among these diagnostic modalities, IHC in particular exhibits high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of ALK fusions when appropriately applied and interpreted. Expert commentary: Discrepancies have been reported between the results of IHC and FISH. However, it was revealed that patients with IHC-positivity and FISH-negativity may respond to alectinib, indicating that IHC can be used as a stand-alone method from a clinical standpoint for the identification of patients eligible for treatment with ALK inhibitors. In addition, differences between ALK variants have been reported to affect the prognosis and efficacy of ALK inhibitor-based treatments, and RT-PCR will likely increase in importance as a complementary tool.

Concomitant resistance mechanisms to multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), including crizotinib and several next generation TKIs, have demonstrated beneficial clinical outcomes in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, resistance mechanisms following multiple TKI treatments in ALK-positive NSCLC are not fully elucidated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mutation profiles of 422 cancer-relevant genes in 52 patients with post-TKI biopsy samples were analyzed using next-generation sequencing (NGS), and compared between patients receiving crizotinib alone (n = 35) and multi-TKIs (n = 17).

RESULTS

EML4-ALK variant 3 is the most frequent ALK variants in this cohort, followed by EML4-ALK variant 1. Half of the patients harbored ALK activating mutations upon progression on crizotinib treatment. After multi-TKIs treatment, 59% of the cases developed resistant ALK mutations, and concomitant ALK activating mutations were more commonly observed in this cohort (P = 0.031). Specifically, ALK G1269 A, L1196 M, and C1156Y substitutions were more common in crizotinib-alone samples, while ALK G1202R was significantly more enriched post-multi-TKIs (P = 0.009). Activated bypass signaling tended to be more prevalent in patients post-multi-TKIs. Furthermore, dual activation of ALK and bypass signaling was more frequently found in the multi-TKIs group (5/17, 29%) in contrast to crizotinib-alone (2/35, 6%) (P = 0.031). Additionally, concurrent TP53 mutation demonstrated significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) compared with TP53 wildtype in crizotinib-alone group (median PFS: 8 vs 13 months, Hazard Ratio = 1.494, P = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

Concurrent ALK activating mutations and/or upregulated bypass signaling are more enriched in patients undergoing multiple ALK TKI treatments compared to crizotinib alone. Concomitant TP53 mutation correlated to unfavorable survival when receiving a single TKI crizotinib.

Variability in lung cancer response to ALK inhibitors cannot be explained by the diversity of ALK fusion variants

Multiple laboratory evidences indicate that distinct variants of ALK translocations differ in their biochemical properties and responsiveness to ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). These data are supported by some clinical studies, which showed improved responses to crizotinib in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients carrying particular variants of ALK translocation. We retrospectively considered 64 Russian patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC, who were treated by crizotinib (n = 23), ceritinib (n = 39) or alectinib (n = 2). ALK fusion variants were genotyped by PCR. Median progression-free survival (PFS) approached to 18 and 21 months in subjects with "short" (v.3a/b, v.5a/b) vs. "long" (TAPE-domain containing) fusion variants (p = 0.783), respectively; similar data were obtained while comparing EML4/ALK variant 1 vs. other ALK translocations (19 and 21 months, respectively; p = 0.604). Objective response rates were also strikingly similar in the above groups ("short": 88%, "long": 77%, p = 0.479; variant 1: 76%, other translocations: 81%, p = 0.753). Furthermore, ALK variants did not influence the disease outcomes when patients treated by crizotinib and ceritinib were analyzed separately. Overall, PFS on ALK TKI did not depend on whether the drug was administered upfront or after chemotherapy. Ceritinib produced significantly longer PFS than crizotinib (p = 0.022). In conclusion, this study revealed that distinct ALK translocation variants render similar clinical responsiveness to ALK inhibitors.

ALK Fusion Partners Impact Response to ALK Inhibition: Differential Effects on Sensitivity, Cellular Phenotypes, and Biochemical Properties

Oncogenic tyrosine kinase fusions involving the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) are detected in numerous tumor types. Although more than 30 distinct 5' fusion partner genes have been reported, treatment of ALK-rearranged cancers is decided without regard to which 5' partner is present. There is little data addressing how the 5' partner affects the biology of the fusion or responsiveness to ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). On the basis of the hypothesis that the 5' partner influences the intrinsic properties of the fusion protein, cellular functions that impact oncogenic potential, and sensitivity to ALK TKIs, clonal 3T3 cell lines stably expressing seven different ALK fusion variants were generated. Biochemical and cellular assays were used to assess the efficacy of various ALK TKIs in clinical use, transformative phenotypes, and biochemical properties of each fusion. All seven ALK fusions induced focus formation and colonies in soft agar, albeit to varying degrees. IC50s were calculated for different ALK TKIs (crizotinib, ensartinib, alectinib, lorlatinib) and consistent differences (5-10 fold) in drug sensitivity were noted across the seven ALK fusions tested. Finally, biochemical analyses revealed negative correlations between kinase activity and protein stability. These results demonstrate that the 5' fusion partner plays an important biological role that affects sensitivity to ALK TKIs.Implications: This study shows that the 5' ALK fusion partner influences ALK TKI drug sensitivity. As many other kinase fusions are found in numerous cancers, often with overlapping fusion partners, these studies have ramifications for other kinase-driven malignancies. Mol Cancer Res; 16(11); 1724-36. ©2018 AACR.

ALK (D5F3) CDx: an immunohistochemistry assay to identify ALK-positive NSCLC patients

Screening for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements is a very important process in treatment decision making for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) is considered the universally accepted reference standard, it is associated with technical difficulties and high costs that have made global implementation of this assay challenging. Conversely, ALK immunohistochemistry has shown high sensitivity and specificity compared to FISH and other molecular assays and is more cost-effective. In fact, the ALK (D5F3) CDx immunohistochemistry assay was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as a standalone test for ALK rearrangements in lung cancer in 2015. In this review, we will discuss the overview of ALK rearrangements in NSCLC, various testing methods for ALK rearrangements, and the details of immunohistochemistry for ALK, in particular one with the ALK antibody clone D5F3.

Challenges in ALK inhibition of ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: from ALK positivity detection to treatment strategies after relapse

ALK positivity, despite representing only in a small proportion of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, is worth researching at diagnosis given the possibility to treat these patients with some targeted ALK inhibitors, which are more potent than chemotherapy. Thanks to understanding the resistance mechanisms, newer and more selective inhibitors are now available in clinical practice. Hence, this disease represents, after EGFR inhibition, a largely effective precision medicine approach. However, there are still some clinical situations in which the targeted drug seems to be ineffective. This review discusses some uncertainty about such a 'precision medicine application', focusing on some weaknesses and giving perspectives and suggestions to improve the management of this specific population.

Alectinib in the treatment of ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: an update on its properties, efficacy, safety and place in therapy

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement is identified in 3–7% of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases, and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionized the management of this subset of NSCLC patients. ALK–TKIs have been proven highly effective in ALK-rearranged advanced NSCLC patients, but after initial responses and benefit, a subsequent progression inevitably occurs. Understanding acquired-resistance mechanisms and defining an appropriate algorithm is becoming even more essential, particularly considering the availability of extremely efficacious next-generation ALK inhibitors. The aim of this review is the analysis of current data about ALK inhibition as a therapeutic strategy in ALK-rearranged NSCLC management, with a focus on a specific ALK–TKI, alectinib. Alectinib is a highly selective inhibitor of ALK and showed systemic and central nervous system (CNS) efficacy in the treatment of this particular population. The change of first-line approach, and consequently of further lines of therapy, in ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients is still a matter of debate. A summary of evidence from randomized trials evaluating alectinib will be presented in order to discuss the available clinical evidence, safety and place in therapy.

Heterogeneous responses and resistant mechanisms to crizotinib in ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Background

ALK‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been proven effective for treating ALK‐positive non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), although patients present with variable responses and disease progression courses. The detailed underlying molecular mechanisms require further investigation to yield a better prognosis.

Methods

Targeted next‐generation sequencing (NGS) mutation profiling was performed on samples from 42 NSCLC patients confirmed positive for ALK rearrangements by fluorescence in situ hybridization or immunohistochemistry who experienced disease progression after crizotinib treatment.

Results

ALK rearrangements were not confirmed in six patients (14%) with other potential oncogenic drivers identified by NGS, who therefore did not respond to crizotinib and had significantly shorter overall survival (OS) compared to NGS ALK ‐positive patients. Fifteen ALK activating mutations were detected in 8 out of 26 post‐treatment samples (31%), among which ALK L1196M and G1269A were the most common acquired mutations detected in half of the patients with ALK activating mutations. Dynamic monitoring of the genetic evolution in one patient revealed both spatial and temporal heterogeneity of resistant mechanisms during different ALK‐TKI treatment courses. Activation of ALK downstream or bypass pathways was detected in patients without ALK activating mutations, such as genetic alterations in PIK3CA, MET, and KRAS. Interestingly, we identified two patients with acquired mutations in the DNA mismatch repair gene POLE, which resulted in a dramatically increased tumor mutation burden, and might contribute to the poor response to crizotinib.

Conclusions

Heterogeneous resistant mechanisms have been identified and correlate to diverse responses to crizotinib. Comprehensive and dynamic mutation profiling is required to better predict clinical outcomes.

The correlation between crizotinib efficacy and molecular heterogeneity by next-generation sequencing in non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EML4-ALK fusion exhibited various durations of response to crizotinib. Molecular heterogeneity is also one of the factors associated with resistance to crizotinib. This study investigated the relevance of molecular heterogeneity to the clinical efficacy of crizotinib using next-generation sequencing (NGS).

Methods

A total of 52 ALK-positive advanced NSCLC patients were enrolled. The genetic variation was revealed by NGS. We identified different ALK fusion types, allelic fraction (AF) and additional coexisting mutations (ACMs) and evaluated the correlation between the above three factors and clinical response to crizotinib.

Results

Among the group that was detected with ALK+ fusion by immunohistochemistry (IHC), patients detected as ALK- fusion by the NGS method were associated with a shorter progression-free survival (PFS) compared with ALK+ patients by NGS. Moreover, for different ALK fusion types, the median PFS of variant 1/2/3 and other uncommon variants were 305, 557, 242 and 370 days, respectively. Although there was no statistically significant difference (P=0.201), patients with ALK variant 2 appeared to display a longer PFS than other types of variants in this study. There was no significant difference in the relationship between ALK fusion AF and PFS (P=0.639). Additionally, there was no correlation between ACMs and PFS in the three groups (IHC+, IHC+/NGS-, and IHC+/NGS+, P=0.738, 0.801 and 0.550). We analysed the relationship between TP53/FAT3 and PFS in the IHC+/NGS+ group, and there was no statistically significant difference (P=0.712/0.631).

Conclusions

It is necessary to use multiple methods together to detect ALK fusion, and we can continue to carry out the study of the correlation between the different contents of heterogeneity of gene mutations and TKI effects using the NGS method.

Genomic heterogeneity of ALK fusion breakpoints in non-small-cell lung cancer

In lung adenocarcinoma, canonical EML4-ALK inversion results in a fusion protein with a constitutively active ALK kinase domain. Evidence of ALK rearrangement occurs in a minority (2-7%) of lung adenocarcinoma, and only ~60% of these patients will respond to targeted ALK inhibition by drugs such as crizotinib and ceritinib. Clinically, targeted anti-ALK therapy is often initiated based on evidence of an ALK genomic rearrangement detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of interphase cells in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections. At the genomic level, however, ALK rearrangements are heterogeneous, with multiple potential breakpoints in EML4, and alternate fusion partners. Using next-generation sequencing of DNA and RNA together with ALK immunohistochemistry, we comprehensively characterized genomic breakpoints in 33 FISH-positive lung adenocarcinomas. Of these 33 cases, 29 (88%) had detectable DNA level ALK rearrangements involving EML4, KIF5B, or non-canonical partners including ASXL2, ATP6V1B1, PRKAR1A, and SPDYA. A subset of 12 cases had material available for RNA-Seq. Of these, eight of eight (100%) cases with DNA rearrangements showed ALK fusion transcripts from RNA-Seq; three of four cases (75%) without detectable DNA rearrangements were similarly negative by RNA-Seq, and one case was positive by RNA-Seq but negative by DNA next-generation sequencing. By immunohistochemistry, 17 of 19 (89%) tested cases were clearly positive for ALK protein expression; the remaining cases had no detectable DNA level rearrangement or had a non-canonical rearrangement not predicted to form a fusion protein. Survival analysis of patients treated with targeted ALK inhibitors demonstrates a significant difference in mean survival between patients with next-generation sequencing confirmed EML4-ALK rearrangements, and those without (20.6 months vs 5.4 months, P<0.01). Together, these data demonstrate abundant genomic heterogeneity among ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma, which may account for differences in treatment response with targeted ALK inhibitors.

Efficacy of Crizotinib among Different Types of ROS1 Fusion Partners in Patients with ROS1-Rearranged Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

ROS1 rearrangement-positive NSCLC can be treated effectively with an anaplastic lymphoma kinase/ROS1/mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor inhibitor such as crizotinib; however, the rate of response remains variable. Although several ROS1 fusion partners have been identified, the efficacy of crizotinib in patients with different types of ROS1 fusion partners is poorly understood.

METHODS

We reviewed clinicopathological data of patients with ROS1 rearrangement who received crizotinib therapy at our institution between April 2014 and December 2016. ROS1 fusion partners were evaluated by using Sanger sequencing for available tumor tissue.

RESULTS

During the study, 49 patients were found to have ROS1 rearrangement and were subsequently treated with crizotinib. Tumor specimens were available for 36 patients, of whom 19 were found to have CD 74 molecule gene (CD74)-ROS1 fusion partners. Before therapy, those in the CD74-ROS1 group were found to have a higher rate of brain metastases (six versus 0 [p = 0.020]). The objective response rate for crizotinib was 83.3% in all patients, whereas it was 94.11% and 73.68% in the non-CD74-ROS1 and CD74-ROS1 groups, respectively. As compared with the CD74-ROS1 group, the non-CD74-ROS1 group had both a significantly longer progression-free survival (17.63 months versus 12.63 months [p = 0.048]) and a significantly longer overall survival (44.50 months versus 24.33 months [p = 0.036]). On multivariable analysis, the only factor associated with overall survival was presence of brain metastases before therapy (p = 0.010). There were no significant factors associated with progression-free survival in the multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggests that patients with CD74-ROS1 fusion partners are more likely to present with brain metastases. Although not independently significant, a trend toward improved survival was observed in patients in the non-CD74-ROS1 group when they were treated with crizotinib.

Impact of EML4-ALK Variant on Resistance Mechanisms and Clinical Outcomes in ALK-Positive Lung Cancer

Purpose Advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( ALK) fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) are effectively treated with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, clinical outcomes in these patients vary, and the benefit of TKIs is limited as a result of acquired resistance. Emerging data suggest that the ALK fusion variant may affect clinical outcome, but the molecular basis for this association is unknown. Patients and Methods We identified 129 patients with ALK-positive NSCLC with known ALK variants. ALK resistance mutations and clinical outcomes on ALK TKIs were retrospectively evaluated according to ALK variant. A Foundation Medicine data set of 577 patients with ALK-positive NSCLC was also examined. Results The most frequent ALK variants were EML4-ALK variant 1 in 55 patients (43%) and variant 3 in 51 patients (40%). We analyzed 77 tumor biopsy specimens from patients with variants 1 and 3 who had progressed on an ALK TKI. ALK resistance mutations were significantly more common in variant 3 than in variant 1 (57% v 30%; P = .023). In particular, ALK G1202R was more common in variant 3 than in variant 1 (32% v 0%; P < .001). Analysis of the Foundation Medicine database revealed similar associations of variant 3 with ALK resistance mutation and with G1202R ( P = .010 and .015, respectively). Among patients treated with the third-generation ALK TKI lorlatinib, variant 3 was associated with a significantly longer progression-free survival than variant 1 (hazard ratio, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.79; P = .011). Conclusion Specific ALK variants may be associated with the development of ALK resistance mutations, particularly G1202R, and provide a molecular link between variant and clinical outcome. ALK variant thus represents a potentially important factor in the selection of next-generation ALK inhibitors.