Predictive power of prothrombin time and serum total bilirubin for postoperative mortality after major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection

BACKGROUND

In 2011, the International Study Group of Liver Surgery defined posthepatectomy liver failure using the prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR) and total serum bilirubin concentration (T-Bil). Data analyzing the clinical impact of PT-INR and T-Bil on postoperative mortality, however, remain limited, especially for major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection (HEBR).

METHODS

Prospectively collected data from 545 patients who underwent HEBR in a single institution from 2002 to 2011 were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses of PT-INR and T-Bil on postoperative days (POD) 1, 3, and 5 were used to determine optimal cu-off values for predicting postoperative mortality.

RESULTS

Most of the treated diseases were biliary tract cancers, including perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (n = 418), gallbladder carcinoma (n = 52), and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n = 27). The mean values for PT-INR and T-Bil on POD 1, 3, and 5 were significantly greater in the patients who died owing to postoperative complications than in the patients who survived. On POD 5, the area under the ROC curve for predicting postoperative mortality and the optimal cutoff value for PT-INR were 0.876 and 1.68, respectively, whereas those of T-Bil were 0.889 and 4.0 mg/dL, respectively. A combination of PT-INR and T-Bil showed strong predictive power (ie, >40% of the patients with values beyond the cutoff value for both PT-INR and T-Bil on POD 5 died).

CONCLUSION

We recommend monitoring both PT-INR and T-Bil to predict accurately which patients are at a high risk after HEBR.

Renal dysfunction is an independent risk factor for mortality after liver resection and the main determinant of outcome in posthepatectomy liver failure

Introduction. The aim of this study was to assess the interaction of liver and renal dysfunction as risk factors for mortality after liver resection. Materials and Methods. A retrospective analysis of 501 patients undergoing liver resection in a single unit was undertaken. Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) was defined according to the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS) definition (assessed on day 5) and renal dysfunction according to RIFLE criteria. 90-day mortality was recorded. Results. Twenty-three patients died within 90 days of surgery (4.6%). The lowest mortality occurred in patients without evidence of PHLF or renal dysfunction (2.7%). The mortality rate in patients with isolated PHLF or renal dysfunction was 20% compared to 45% in patients with both. Diabetes (P = 0.028), renal dysfunction (P = 0.030), and PHLF on day 5 (P = 0.011) were independent predictors of 90-day mortality. Discussion. PHLF and postoperative renal dysfunction are independent predictors of 90-day mortality following liver resection but the predictive value for mortality is significantly higher when failure of both organ systems occurs simultaneously.

Liver failure after major liver resection: risk assessment by using preoperative Gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3-T MR imaging

PURPOSE

To determine if gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with measurement of relative liver enhancement (RLE) on hepatobiliary phase images can allow preoperative assessment of the risk of liver failure after major liver resection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The local institutional review committee approved this retrospective analysis and waived written informed consent. The study included 73 patients (39 men; median age, 64.4 years) who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3-T MR imaging before resection of three or more liver segments. RLE was calculated as the ratio of signal intensity measurements of the liver parenchyma before and 20 minutes after intravenous administration of gadoxetic acid. RLE was assessed in each liver segment and the mean value of all segments was used for analysis. Posthepatectomy liver failure was defined according to the "50-50 criteria" (ie, prothrombin time <50% and serum bilirubin >50 µmol/L on postoperative day 5) and the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS) classification. The association of RLE and liver failure was tested with univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. In addition to RLE, the latter also included demographic, clinical, operative, and histologic variables.

RESULTS

Patients with liver failure according to the 50-50 criteria (n = 3) had significantly lower RLE (54.5%) than those without (125.6%) (P = .009). According to ISGLS criteria, RLE was 112.5% in patients with grade A liver failure (n = 20), 88.4% in patients with grade B (n = 7), 41.7% (n = 2) in patients with grade C, and 136.5% (P < .001) in those without liver failure. In a logistic regression analysis, RLE was inversely related to the probability of liver failure according to the 50-50 (P = .02) and ISGLS (P < .001) criteria. In a multivariate analysis, RLE was independently associated with a higher probability of liver failure according to ISGLS classification (P = .003).

CONCLUSION

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging can help with the assessment of the risk for liver failure after major liver resection.

Risk assessment in patients undergoing liver resection

BACKGROUND

Liver resection is still a risky procedure with high morbidity and mortality. It is significant to predict the morbidity and mortality with some models after liver resection.

DATA SOURCES

The MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library databases were searched using the terms "hepatectomy" and "risk assessment" for relevant studies before August 2012. Papers published in English were included.

RESULTS

Thirty-four original papers were included finally. Some models, such as MELD, APACHE II, E-PASS, or POSSUM, widely used in other populations, are useful to predict the morbidity and mortality after liver resection. Some special models for liver resection are used to predict outcomes after liver resection, such as mortality, liver dysfunction, transfusion, or acute renal failure. However, there is no good scoring system to predict or classify surgical complications because of shortage of internal or external validation.

CONCLUSION

It is important to validate the models for the major complications after liver resection with further internal or external databases.

Deficiency of the oxygen sensor PHD1 augments liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy

PURPOSE

Liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy (PH) occurs in conditions of reduced oxygen supply. HIF prolyl hydroxylase enzymes (PHD1, PHD2, and PHD3) are oxygen sensors involved in adaptive response to hypoxia. Specific functions of these PHD enzymes in liver regeneration have, however, remained enigmatic. Here, we investigated the significance of PHD1 in liver regeneration following hepatectomy.

METHODS

Liver regeneration was studied in PHD1-deficient (PHD1(-/-)) and wild type (WT) mice subjected to 80% hepatectomy. For in vitro analyses, hepatocytes were isolated from PHD1(-/-) and WT livers. Cell cycle progression was studied via FACS-based analysis of nuclear DNA profile. Transcription factor binding assays, qRT-PCR, and immunoblotting were applied to study the relevance of PHD1 downstream effectors during liver regeneration.

RESULTS

Liver regeneration was significantly enhanced in PHD1(-/-) mice compared to WT littermates. This effect was due to enhanced proliferation rather than to hypertrophy of liver cells. Cell cycle progression was significantly enhanced, and transcriptional activity of the cell cycle regulator c-Myc was increased in PHD1-deficient hepatocytes. These changes coincided with increased expression of cyclin D2, a cell cycle-promoting c-Myc target, and decreased expression of the cell cycle-delaying c-Myc target p21.

CONCLUSIONS

Loss of PHD1 enhances liver regeneration by boosting hepatocyte proliferation in a c-Myc-dependent fashion. PHD1 might, therefore, represent a potential target to facilitate liver regeneration after surgical resection.

Bilirubin level in the drainage fluid is an early and independent predictor of clinically relevant bile leakage after hepatic resection

BACKGROUND

Variations in the definition of bile leakage after hepatic resection have prevented the identification of risk factors for early diagnosis and efficient management. The International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS) definition standardizes reporting of this complication. It was our aim in the present study to prospectively validate the ISGLS definition of bile leakage after hepatic resection. Furthermore, we sought to identify early predictors of clinically relevant bile leakage.

METHODS

A total of 265 patients who underwent elective hepatic resection were enrolled prospectively. Bilirubin concentrations were determined in the serum and drainage fluid until postoperative day 5. Risk factors of Grade B/C bile leakage were assessed by the use of univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Grade A, B, and C bile leakage was diagnosed in 23 (8.7%), 38 (14.3%), and 11 (4.1%) patients, respectively. The definition as well as severity grading of bile leakage correlated with the duration of drainage and intensive care unit and hospital stay. Perioperative mortality was 0% for Grade A, 5.2% for Grade B, and 45.4% for Grade C bile leakage (P < .0001). Multivariate analysis confirmed bilirubin concentration in the drainage fluid ≥2.4 mg/dL on postoperative day 2 (odds ratio 11.88; 95% confidence interval 5.33-26.49; P < .0001) and anatomic resection (odds ratio 3.59; 95% CI 1.08-11.97; P = .04) as independent predictors of clinically relevant bile leakage.

CONCLUSION

The ISGLS definition and severity grading of bile leakage after hepatic resection is clinically meaningful. Bilirubin concentration in the drainage fluid on postoperative day 2 is a strong predictor of clinically relevant bile leakage.

Clamp-crushing versus stapler hepatectomy for transection of the parenchyma in elective hepatic resection (CRUNSH)--a randomized controlled trial (NCT01049607)

Background

Hepatic resection is still associated with significant morbidity. Although the period of parenchymal transection presents a crucial step during the operation, uncertainty persists regarding the optimal technique of transection. It was the aim of the present randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hepatic resection using the technique of stapler hepatectomy compared to the simple clamp-crushing technique.

Methods/Design

The CRUNSH Trial is a prospective randomized controlled single-center trial with a two-group parallel design. Patients scheduled for elective hepatic resection without extrahepatic resection at the Department of General-, Visceral- and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg are enrolled into the trial and randomized intraoperatively to hepatic resection by the clamp-crushing technique and stapler hepatectomy, respectively. The primary endpoint is total intraoperative blood loss. A set of general and surgical variables are documented as secondary endpoints. Patients and outcome-assessors are blinded for the treatment intervention.

Discussion

The CRUNSH Trial is the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of stapler hepatectomy compared to the clamp-crushing technique for parenchymal transection during elective hepatic resection.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01049607