Atlanto-axial fusion with transarticular screw fixation

Occipito-atlanto-axial osteoarthritis: a cross sectional clinico-radiological prevalence study in high risk and general population

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional clinico-radiologic evaluation of occipito-atlantoaxial (OC1C2) region of 2 population groups.

OBJECTIVE

Determine the prevalence of OC1C2 osteoarthritis in porters involved in carrying loads on the head and general male population. Describe its clinico-radiologic manifestations.

SUMMARY OF THE BACKGROUND DATA

In addition to age, head loading is a known cause of degeneration affecting the occipito-cervical region. The impact of head loading in the population aged between third and sixth decade is unknown. Head loading is a common custom in the developing countries.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study group (n = 107) included randomly selected male porters from railway stations who underwent computed tomography (CT) study of the OC1C2 region, plain radiographs of the cervical spine and detailed clinical examination. Control group (n = 107) included randomly selected male patients undergoing CT scan study for diseases of paranasal sinuses with coincidental screening of OC1C2 region along with clinical assessment. The data were analyzed using SPSS 15 software.

RESULT

Mean age for study group was 32.6 years and controls was 34.6 years (P = 0.156). In the study group, duration of occupational exposure was 10.9 (+/-8.7) years; 81.3% porters being symptomatic with an age of 33.4 (+/-9.6) years. Radiologic prevalence of OC1C2 osteoarthritis in study group was 91.6% and in control group was 6.8%; age of affected individuals was 33.4 (+/-9.3) and 47.9 (+/-8.0) years, respectively. Most common complaint was suboccipital neck pain (69.7%); while the CT finding was decreased joint space with sclerosis and irregularity of the margins (81.3%). No statistically significant association was found between presence of radiologic changes and symptoms. Age, duration of occupational exposure and its relationship with various clinico-radiologic manifestations was studied.

CONCLUSION

This condition has significant prevalence in porters, beginning at an early age. Diagnosis is based on the clinico-radiologic presentation. CT is the investigation of choice. Resultant functional limitations make early identification of this condition imperative.

Biomechanical analysis comparing three C1-C2 transarticular screw salvaging fixation techniques

STUDY DESIGN

This is an in vitro biomechanical study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the biomechanical stability of the 3 C1-C2 transarticular screw salvaging fixation techniques.

SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA

Stabilization of the atlantoaxial complex is a challenging procedure because of its complicated anatomy. Many posterior stabilization techniques of the atlantoaxial complex have been developed with C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation been the current gold standard. The drawback of using the transarticular screws is that it has a potential risk of vertebral artery injury due to a high riding transverse foramen of C2 vertebra, and screw malposition. In such cases, it is not recommended to proceed with inserting the contralateral transarticular screw and the surgeon should find an alternative to fix the contralateral side. Many studies are available comparing different atlantoaxial stabilization techniques, but none of them compared the techniques to fix the contralateral side while using the transarticular screw on one side. The current options are C1 lateral mass screw and short C2 pedicle screw or C1 lateral mass screw and C2 intralaminar screw, or C1-C2 sublaminar wire.

METHODS

Nine fresh human cervical spines with intact ligaments (C0-C4) were subjected to pure moments in the 6 loading directions. The resulting spatial orientations of the vertebrae were recorded using an Optotrak 3-dimensional Motion Measurement System. Measurements were made sequentially for the intact spine after creating type II odontoid fracture and after stabilization with unilateral transarticular screw placement across C1-C2 (TS) supplemented with 1 of the 3 transarticular salvaging techniques on the contralateral side; C1 lateral mass screw and C2 pedicle screw (TS+C1LMS+C2PS), C1 lateral mass and C2 intralaminar screw (TS+C1LMS+C2ILS), or sublaminar wire (TS + wire).

RESULTS

The data indicated that all the 3 stabilization techniques significantly decreased motion when compared to intact in all the loading cases (left/right lateral bending, left/right axial rotation, flexion) except extension. All the 3 instrumented specimens were equally stable in extension/flexion and lateral bending modes. TS+C1LMS+C2PS was equivalent to TS+C1LMS+C2ILS (P > 0.05) and superior to TS + wire in axial rotation (P < 0.05). Also, TS+C1LMS+C2ILS was superior to TS + wire in axial rotation (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Fixation of atlantoaxial complex using unilateral transarticular screw supplemented with contralateral C1 lateral mass and C2 intralaminar screws is biomechanically equivalent to C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screws and both are biomechanically superior to C1-C2 sublaminar wire in axial rotation.

Biomechanical evaluation of segmental occipitoatlantoaxial stabilization techniques

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical study using human cadaveric cervical spines.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the construct stability of 3 different segmental occipitoatlantoaxial (C0-C1-C2) stabilization techniques.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Different C0-C1-C2 stabilization techniques are used for unstable conditions in the upper cervical spine, all with different degrees of risk to the vertebral artery. Techniques with similar stability but less risk to the vertebral artery may be advantageous.

METHODS

Six human cadaveric cervical spines (C0-C5) (age: 74 +/- 5.0 years) were used. After testing the intact spines, instability was created by transecting the transverse and alar ligaments. The spines were instrumented from the occiput to C2 using 3 different techniques which varied in their attachment to C2. All spines had 6 screws placed into the occiput along with lateral mass screws at C1. The 3 variations used in attachment to C2 were (1) C2 crossing laminar screws, (2) C2 pedicle screws, and (3) C1-C2 transarticular screws. The C1 lateral mass screws were removed before placement of the C1-C2 transarticular screws. Range of motion across C0-C2 was measured for each construct. The data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. The following post hoc comparisons were made: (1) intact spine versus each of the 3 techniques, (2) laminar screw technique versus the pedicle screw technique, and (3) laminar screw technique versus the transarticular screw technique. The level of significance was alpha = 0.01 (after Bonferroni correction for 5 comparisons).

RESULTS

All 3 stabilization techniques significantly decreased range of motion across C0-C2 compared to the intact spine (P < 0.01). There was no statistical difference among the 3 stabilization methods in flexion/extension and axial rotation. In lateral bending, the technique using C2 crossing laminar screws demonstrated a trend toward increased range of motion compared to the other 2 techniques. CT scans in both axial and sagittal views demonstrated greater proximity to the vertebral artery in the pedicle and transarticular screw techniques compared to the crossing laminar screw technique.

CONCLUSION

Occipitoatlantoaxial stabilization techniques using C2 crossing laminar screws, C2 pedicles screws, and C1-C2 transarticular screws offer similar biomechanical stability. Using the C2 crossing laminar screw technique may offer an advantage over the other techniques due to the reduction of the risk to the vertebral artery during C2 screw placement.

SAFE ZONE FOR C1 LATERAL MASS SCREWS

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the possible complications of overpenetrated C1 lateral mass screws and to identify and define a “safe zone” area anterior to the C1 vertebra.

METHODS

The study was performed on 10 cadavers and 50 random patients who had undergone computed tomographic scanning with contrast medium of the neck for other purposes. Atlas lateral mass screw trajectories were plotted, and the safe zone for screw placement anterior to the atlas vertebra was determined for each trajectory.

RESULTS

The trajectory of the internal carotid artery was measured from its medial wall. The trajectory of the internal carotid artery according to the ideal entrance point of the screw was 11.55 ± 4.55 degrees (range, 2–22 degrees) in the cadavers and 9.78 ± 4.55 degrees (range, −5 to 22 degrees) bilaterally in the patients. At 15 degrees (ideal screw trajectory), the thickness of the rectus capitis anterior muscle and longus capitis muscle was 6.69 ± 0.83 mm (range, 5.32–7.92 mm) in the cadavers and 7.29 ± 1.90 mm (range, 0.50–13.63 mm) bilaterally in the patients. The smallest distance from the internal carotid artery to the anterior cortex of the C1 vertebra was calculated as 4.33 ± 2.03 mm (range, 1.15–8.40 mm) bilaterally in the cadavers and 5.07 ± 1.72 mm (range, 2.15–8.91 mm) bilaterally in radiological specimens.

CONCLUSION

The internal carotid artery trajectory is lateral to the ideal entrance point of C1 lateral mass screws. The medial angulation of a screw placed in the lateral mass of C1 seemed to increase the margin of safety for the internal carotid artery. The rectus capitis anterior and longus capitis muscles may be thought of as a safe zone area for C1 lateral mass screws. At more than 25 degrees of medial angulation, the risk of perforation of the oropharyngeal wall increases.

Posterior Fusion in Patients with Trauma, Instability, and Tumor of the Cervical Spine

Trauma, instabilities and tumors of the cervical spine are treated with established methods of surgery. Therefore, anterior fusion is considered to be a standardized procedure for the lower cervical spine, while posterior and anterior instrumentation facilitates stabilization of the upper cervical spine. However, special situations that particularly require posterior instrumentation in traumatic lesions, tumor or other kinds of instabilities arise again and again. Neurological deficit symptoms, bone quality and related diseases fundamentally lead to a decision of posterior access and fusion. Different pathologies and corresponding reasons for posterior surgical interventions on the cervical spine are described in this paper and discussed using the current literature.

C1 lateral mass screw-induced occipital neuralgia: a report of two cases

C1-2 polyaxial screw-rod fixation is a relatively new technique. While recognizing the potential for inadvertent vertebral artery injury, there have been few reports in the literature outlining all the possible complications. Aim of this study is to review all cases of C1 lateral mass screws insertion with emphasis on the evaluation of potential structures at risk during the procedure. We retrospectively reviewed all patients in our unit who had C1 lateral mass screw insertion over a 2-year period. The C1 lateral mass screw was inserted as part of an atlantoaxial stabilization or incorporated into a modular occiput/subaxial construct. Outcome measures included clinical and radiological parameters. Clinical indicators included age, gender, neurologic status, surgical indication and the number of levels stabilized. Intraoperative complications including blood loss, vertebral artery injury or dural tears were recorded. Postoperative pain distribution and neurological deficit were recorded. Radiological indicators included postoperative plain radiographs to assess sagittal alignment and to check for screw malposition or construct failure. A total of 18 lateral mass screws were implanted in 9 patients. There were three male and six female patients who had C1 lateral mass screw insertion in this unit. Two patients had atlantoaxial stabilization for C2 fracture. There were four patients with rheumatoid arthritis whose C1 lateral mass screws were inserted as part of an occipitocervical or subaxial cervical stabilization. There was no vertebral artery injury, no cerebrospinal fluid leak and minimal blood loss in all patients. Three patients developed postoperative occipital neuralgia. This neuralgia was transient, in one of the patients having settled at 6-week follow-up. In the other two patients the neuralgia was unresolved at time of latest follow-up but was adequately controlled with appropriate pain management. Postoperatively no patient had radiographic evidence of construct failure and all demonstrated excellent sagittal alignment. It has been reported that the absence of threads on the upper portion of the long shank screw may protect against neural irritation. However, insertion of the C1 lateral mass screw necessitates careful caudal retraction of the C2 dorsal root ganglion. The insertion point for the C1 lateral mass screw is at the junction of the C1 posterior arch and the midpoint of the posterior inferior part of the C1 lateral mass. Two patients in our series suffered occipital neuralgia post-insertion of C1 lateral mass screws. This highlights the potential for damage to the C2 nerve root during C1 lateral mass screw placement.

Efficacy and durability of the titanium mesh cage spacer combined with transarticular screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability in rheumatoid arthritis patients

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective investigation was conducted to determine efficacy and endurance of titanium mesh cage as a strut for interlaminar wiring by comparing with autologous iliac bone graft (AIBG). For patients with atlantoaxial instability (AAI), allograft bone was harvested on an interlaminar mesh cage and transarticular fixation (TAF) was performed.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There have been few studies about atlantoaxial fusion rate and advantages for titanium mesh cage from comparison with AIBG in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.

METHODS

Between January 1998 and October 2007, 55 RA patients were surgically treated for AAI. Among them, 34 patients who underwent surgical treatment with TAF and interlaminar wiring using mesh cage packed with allograft, enrolled in this study (group I). For evaluation of bone fusion about mesh cage group, 21 RA patients who underwent TAF and interlaminar wiring with AIBG were also selected (group II). In both groups, radiologic evidence of bone fusion was assessed with measuring atlantodental interval. Patients were strongly encouraged to mobilize by postoperative 1 day with external cervical bracing. The mean follow-up period was 12.3 months (6-36 months).

RESULTS

Overall, bone fusion was achieved in 33 patients (97%) in group I. And, this was comparable with 100% of group II. There was no statistical difference in bone fusion rate. During the study period, there were 2 instrument-related complications of screw malposition and cable loosening.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study in which mesh cage was used as an interlaminar spacer, showed immediate rigid fixation and successful bone union. We also could prevent donor site morbidities frequently seen in patients with surgical treatment for AAI.

Reducible and irreducible os odontoideum in childhood treated with posterior wiring, instrumentation and fusion. Past or present?

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to evaluate the results of instrumented rod and wire fusion in children with craniovertebral junction (CVJ) instability and os odontoideum.

METHODS

We evaluated seven children (mean age 9.85 years) with Down and Morquio's syndromes and primary os odontoideum. X-ray, computerized tomography (CT) scan and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the CVJ showed reducible instability in all of the cases but one. All the children underwent surgical correction by means of posterior wiring, instrumentation, fusion and external orthosis. A posterior wiring technique was also utilized in the only child with irreducible preoperative atlantoaxial instability, which, however, proved to be reducible under general anesthesia.

FINDINGS

At maximum follow-up (observation range 28 to 106 months, mean 59.42 months), the clinical picture was improved in all the patients. The postoperative neuroradiological investigations demonstrated satisfactory bony fusion with neural decompression in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A wiring technique to correct atlantoaxial instabilities has been shown to be more relevant in these children with syndromic atlantoaxial dislocation and os odontoideum due to its simplicity, safety (continuous fluoroscopic assistance is not necessary and there is no risk of neuro-vascular injuries) and lower costs (no complex hardware devices; no neuronavigation systems are required). Preoperative irreducibility of the C1-C2 shift is not an absolute criterion for transoral decompression in children since os odontoideum can be reduced under general anesthesia.

Anatomic determination of optimal entry point and direction for C1 lateral mass screw placement

STUDY DESIGN

Anatomic study of C1 osteology using computerized tomography.

OBJECTIVES

To define the anatomy of the C1 lateral mass and make recommendations for optimal entry point and screw placement at C1.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

C1 lateral mass screw fixation is a reliable biomechanical technique that gives equivalent stability to that of Magerl transarticular screw fixation combined with posterior wiring for C1-C2 fusion. Use of a lateral mass screw allows alternative stabilization constructs to the transarticular technique when C2 vertebral artery anatomy is unfavorable. Because the vertebral artery travels lateral to the lateral mass, then crosses medially over the C1 neural arch, it is at risk during instrumentation. Medially, the cord and canal contents are at risk. While the anatomy of the C1 vertebra and lateral mass is well known, specific definition of ideal entry points, screw pathway direction, and dimensions of screws requires further clarification to enable a clinically safe surgical technique.

METHODS

Fifty consecutive patients underwent computerized tomography scans of their cervical spine. Using calibrated scans, measurements were taken to give the average dimensions of the C1 vertebra with a view for insertion of lateral mass screws beneath the posterior arch. The range of anatomic dimensions was examined to assess risk of vertebral artery damage in this population.

RESULTS

The average length of screw within the lateral mass is 17.9 mm with 21.5 mm of screw posterior to the lateral mass, necessary to allow rod placement posteriorly. The safest entry point was directly beneath the medial edge of the posterior arch/lamina where it joins the lateral mass. The ideal direction of screw angulation in the sagittal plane was parallel to the posterior arch of C1. In the medial lateral plane, direct anterior placement could be used, but the lateral mass will tolerate 20 degrees of medial angulation from this starting point. The average distance between the vertebral artery foramen laterally and the screw pathway was 8.8 mm using these landmarks, and 5.8 mm from the medial aspect of the lateral mass. The range of anatomic variation was such that 9 lateral masses had a vertebral artery foramen to screw distance of only 3 mm. The vertebral artery was not at risk when these anatomic landmarks were used.

CONCLUSIONS

C1 lateral mass screws are best placed beneath the posterior arch, parallel with the arch in the sagittal plan. The entry point is the medial border of the neural arch at its junction with the lateral mass. Straight ahead screw direction is safe in the axial plane, but up to 20 degrees of medial angulation will increase the safety margin from the vertebral artery foramen, and this technique avoids vertebral artery damage and optimizes lateral mass screw purchase. We suggest that this is the preferred method of entry into the lateral mass of C1.

A novel computer-assisted drill guide template for placement of C2 laminar screws

The present method of C2 laminar screw placement relies on anatomical landmarks for screw placement. Placement of C2 laminar screws using drill template has not been described in the literature. The authors reported on their experience with placement of C2 laminar screws using a novel computer-assisted drill guide template in nine patients undergoing posterior occipito-cervical fusion. CT scan of C2 vertebrae was performed. 3D model of C2 vertebrae was reconstructed by software MIMICS 10.01. The 3D vertebral model was then exported in STL format, and opened in a workstation running software UG imageware12.0 for determining the optimal laminar screw size and orientation. A virtual navigational template was established according to the laminar anatomic trait. The physical vertebrae and navigational template were manufactured using rapid prototyping. The navigational template was sterilized and used intraoperative to assist the placement of laminar screw. Overall, 19 C2 laminar screws were placed and the accuracy of screw placement was confirmed with postoperative X-ray and CT scanning. There were not complications of related screws insertion. Average follow-up was 9 months (range 4-13 months), 77.8% of the patients exhibited improvement in their myelopathic symptoms; in 22.2% the symptoms were unchanged. Postoperative computed tomographic (CT) scanning was available for allowing the evaluation of placement of thirteen C2 laminar screws, all of which were in good position with no spinal canal violation. This study shows a patient-specific template technique that is easy to use, can simplify the surgical act and generates highly accurate C2 laminar screw placement. Advantages of this technology over traditional techniques include planning of the screw trajectory is done completely in the presurgical period as well as the ability to size the screw to the patient's anatomy.

C1-C2 intra-articular screw fixation for atlantoaxial subluxation due to rheumatoid arthritis

While various surgical procedures have been developed for the treatment of atlantoaxial subluxation due to rheumatoid arthritis, C1-C2 intra-articular screw fixation was developed to reduce intraoperative injuries to vertebral arteries. The purpose of this study was to report the therapeutic outcome of this procedure, which was followed for >2 years. Preoperative symptoms were alleviated in all patients. Only 1 patient with subaxial canal stenosis underwent additional laminoplasty during follow-up. All patients with class IIIA or milder neural deficit according to Ranawat's classification showed improvement to class I or II. There were no surgery-related complications or incidents, including injuries to vertebral arteries. Bone union was observed in all patients. No change was observed in the reduced atlas-dens interval during follow-up. The atlantoaxial angle was -6 degrees to 30 degrees (average, 19.4 degrees) at follow-up, and was >or=30 degrees after surgery (fusion in an overextended position) in only 1 patient. Although postoperative deterioration of cervical alignment was observed in 4 patients (18.2%), there was no additional surgery due to deterioration of cervical alignment. With no surgery-related complications or incidents, this procedure could be a safe and acceptable option for atlantoaxial subluxation due to rheumatoid arthritis.

Pre-operative irreducible C1-C2 dislocations: intra-operative reduction and posterior fixation. The "always posterior strategy"

BACKGROUND

According to Menezes' algorithm, pre-operative dynamic neuroradiological investigation in C1-C2 dislocations (C1C2D) instability is strongly advocated in order to exclude those patients not eligible for posterior fixation and fusion without previous anterior trans-oral decompression. Anterior irreducible compression due to C1C2D instability, it is said, needs trans-oral anterior decompression. We reviewed our experience in order to refute such a paradigm.

METHODS

The study involves 23 patients who were operated on for cranio-vertebral junction (CVJ) instability; all of them had C1C2D of varying degree on x-ray, computerised tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the CVJ. Pre-operatively, irreducible C1C2D was demonstrated only in 3 patients, (2 with Down's Syndrome, one of them was harbouring os odontoideum, 1 Rheumatoid Arthritis), i.e. 13.04%; the remaining 19 (86.9%) had reducible C1-C2 dislocation. After an unsuccessful traction test conducted in the pre-operative phase under sedation, it was possible to completely reduce the C1C2D (with a combination of axial traction with light extension of the neck on the chest and a light flexion of the head on the neck by using a Mayfield head holder) and proceed to posterior fixation in all the patients under general anaesthesia using a precise "timing sequences fixation technique". Wiring (C0 and C3 were fixed first being stretched up to approximately 10 lbs, then C2 in order to pull up this vertebra last by forcing approximately 8 lbs) or screw fixation methods were used to achieve fusion along with post-operative external orthosis and neuroradiological assessment of the C1C2D. The instrumentation produced a lever and pulley effect which assisted reduction of the dislocation.

FINDINGS

At follow up (range 34-55 months-mean 45.33 months) the clinical picture was improved or stable in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-operative irreducibility of the C1C2D should not be an absolute indication for trans-oral decompression. An attempt to reduce the dislocation under general anaesthesia and during posterior fixation should be attempted in Down's syndrome, os odontoideum and rheumatoid arthritis.

Biomechanical evaluation of parasagittal occipital plating: screw load sharing analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervical instrumentation techniques.

OBJECTIVE

Compare methods of occipital instrumentation by quantifying load sharing of occipital screws and measuring motion across instrumented occipitocervical spines.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Newer occipitocervical plate/screw systems that attach to longitudinal rods have been developed to improve fixation. These devices place screws in the center of occipital bone or off-midline. Midline plates offer screw purchase in thicker bone. Off-midline systems may increase the effective moment arm for torsional and lateral bending control. Measurement of screw loads within occipital plates is useful for determining optimal plate configuration.

METHODS

Ten cadaveric specimens (occiput-C4) were tested in flexion/extension (FE), lateral bending (LAT), and axial rotation (ROT) over +/-3 Nm pure moment. After intact testing, 4 occipitocervical fixation constructs were tested using washer load cells to assess loading across screws used to fix the plates to the occiput. Parasagittal occipital plates were positioned either convex or concave side facing medially. Each plate was first fixed using 3 screws (rostral, middle, caudal), then with the caudal screw eliminated (simulated failure). Range of motion (ROM) and peak screw loads are reported.

RESULTS

ROM decreased from intact to any of the 4 fusion plate configurations in FE, LAT, and ROT (P << 0.05), but not between plate configurations. Screw load significantly decreased from medially convex to medially concave configurations in LAT, but no significant changes were observed in FE or ROT. With caudal screws removed, middle screws peak loads significantly increased in FE and LAT (P < 0.05), but not ROT.

CONCLUSION

Occipital screw placement off-midline improves screw loads under lateral bending forces on occipitocervical constructs, though loads for FE and ROT are unchanged. As screws pullout, the loads may be redistributed, resulting in increased screw pullout forces above. Despite the improvement in screw loads for laterally based plates during lateral bending, overall ROM across the occipitocervical junction is unchanged.

Anatomic considerations for C2 pedicle screw placement: the use of computerized tomography measurements

OBJECTIVE: more detailed anatomical knowledge of the C2 pedicle is required to optimize and minimize the risk of screw placement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the linear and angular dimensions of the true C2 pedicle using axial CT. METHODS: ninety three patients (47 males, 46 females mean age 48 years) who had cervical spinal CT imaging performed were evaluated for this study. Axial images of the C2 pedicle were selected and the following pedicle parameters were determined: pedicle width (PW, the mediolateral diameter of the pedicle isthmus, perpendicular to the pedicle axis) and pedicle transverse angle (PTA, that is, the angle between the pedicle axis and the midline of the vertebral body). RESULTS: the overall mean pedicle width was 5.8 1.2mm. The mean pedicle width in males (6.01.3mm) was greater than that in the female subjects (5.6 1.1mm). This difference was not found to be statistically significant (p=.6790). The overall mean pedicle transverse angle was 43.93.9 degrees. The mean PTA in males was 43.23.8 degrees, while that in females was 44.73.7 degrees. CONCLUSION: preoperative planning is absolutely mandatory, particularly in determining not only screw trajectory, but in analyzing individual patient anatomy and reception to a C2 pedicle screw.

C1 pedicle screws versus C1 lateral mass screws: comparisons of pullout strengths and biomechanical stabilities

STUDY DESIGN

In vitro biomechanical study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the pullout strengths and the biomechanical stabilities afforded by C1 lateral mass screws and C1 pedicle screws using bicortical and unicortical fixation techniques.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Posterior screw fixation techniques in the atlas including C1 lateral mass screw and C1 pedicle screw. The shortcomings of C1 lateral mass screw technique and potential risks of bicortical fixation method were recently described; C1 pedicle screw technique with unicortical fixation might overcome these anatomic and clinical drawbacks. However, it is unknown whether the biomechanical characteristics of unicortical C1 pedicle screw are comparable with that of bicortical C1 lateral mass screw. METHODS.: Bicortical or unicortical C1 pedicle screws and C1 lateral mass screws were inserted into 12 adult fresh human C1 specimens. Pullout strength was evaluated using a material testing machine. The construct's stability of bicortical C1 lateral mass screws or unicortical C1 pedicle screws incorporating unicortical C2 pedicle screws was compared with bilateral transarticular screws using another 6 fresh cervical cadaver spines. Pullout strength and biomechanical stability differences were compared statistically.

RESULTS

Bicortical C1 pedicle screws provided the biggest pullout strength (1757.0 +/- 318.7 N) of all 4 methods, whereas unicortical C1 lateral mass screws provided the weakest(794.5 +/- 314.8 N). However, there were no statistically significant differences between bicortical C1 lateral mass screws (1243.8 +/- 350.0 N) and unicortical C1 pedicle screws (1192.5 +/- 172.6 N). Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference of biomechanical construct stability between unicortical C1 pedicle screw-rod constructs and bicortical C1 lateral mass screw-rod constructs.

CONCLUSION

C1 pedicle screws are stiffer than C1 lateral mass screws. Unicortical C1 pedicle screw provided the same pullout resistance and three-dimensional stability as bicortical C1 lateral mass fixation. Although lateral mass screw placement into C1 requires bicortical purchase, pedicle screw insertion into the atlas only requires unicortical fixation.

Fusions at the craniovertebral junction

INTRODUCTION

The surgical management of craniovertebral junction instability in pediatric patients has unique challenges. While the indications for internal fixation in children are similar to those of adults, the data concerning techniques, complications, and outcomes of spinal instrumentation comes from experience with adult patients. Diminutive osseous and ligamentous structures and anatomical variations associated with syndromic craniovertebral abnormalities frequently complicates the approaches and limits the use of internal fixation in children. Cervical arthrodesis in the pediatric age group has the potential for limiting growth potential and causing secondary deformity. Recent advances in image analysis have enabled preoperative planning which is critical to evaluate the size of instrumentation and its relation to the patient's anatomy. Newer techniques have recently evolved and have been incorporated in the management of pediatric patients with requirement for craniocervical stabilization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Over 750 craniovertebral junction fusions have been reviewed in children. The indications for atlantoaxial arthrodesis were: (a) absent odontoid process, dystopic os odontoideum, absent posterior arch of C1; (b) Morquio's syndrome, Goldenhar's syndrome, Conradi's syndrome, and spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia. The acquired abnormalities of trauma, postinfectious instability, and Down's syndrome completed the indication in children. The indications for occipitocervical fusion were: (a) anterior and posterior bifid C1 arches with instability, absent occipital condyles; b) severe reducible basilar invagination, unstable dystopic os odontoideum, and unilateral atlas assimilation; (c) acquired phenomenon with traumatic occipitocervical dislocation, complex craniovertebral junction fractures of C1 and C2, after transoral craniovertebral junction decompression, cranial settling in Down's syndrome and inflammatory disease such as Grisel's syndrome. Instability was seen in children with clivus chordoma and osteoblastoma. Atlantoaxial fusions were performed mainly with interlaminar rib graft fusion and more recently with the transarticular screw fixation in the older patient. In the teenager, lateral mass screws at C1 and rod fixation were made; C2 pars interarticular screw fixation and C2 pedicle screw fixation. A C2 translaminar screw fixation is described. Occipitocervical fusions were made utilizing rib grafts below the age of 6. A contoured loop fixation was made in children above the age of 7, and recently, rod and screw fixation was also utilized.

RESULTS

Abnormal cervical spine growth was not seen in children who underwent craniocervical stabilization below the age of 5. The authors have reserved rigid instrumentation for children above the age of 10 years and dependent on the anatomy.

Insertion of lateral mass screw of the atlas via the posterior arch: anatomical study of screw insertion using dry bone samples of the atlas from Japanese cadavers

BACKGROUND

A new technique involving screw fixation of the atlas via the posterior arch and lateral mass has recently been reported for atlantoaxial instability. Because the posterior arch is thin, lateral mass screws risk penetrating the upper part of the posterior arch and damaging the vertebral artery running along the upper part of the posterior arch.

METHODS

A total of 50 dry bone samples of the atlas from Japanese cadavers were used. We manually measured the shortest distance from the vertebral canal to the transverse foramen and the thickness at the thinnest part of the groove using calipers and investigated the frequency of dorsal ponticuli at the posterior arch.

RESULTS

The area from the vertebral canal to the transverse foramen was thick enough to allow screw insertion, but the thickness of the posterior arch at the thinnest part of the groove was less than the screw diameter (3.5 mm) in 22% of vertebrae and <4 mm in 39%. A dorsal ponticuli was present in 10% of these samples.

CONCLUSIONS

The size and shape of the posterior arch must be evaluated using radiography and computed tomography before inserting a lateral mass screw of the atlas via the posterior arch.

Is rheumatoid arthritis a risk factor for a high-riding vertebral artery?

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective comparative study on the morphologic characteristics of the axis in patients with or without rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

OBJECTIVE

To compare the morphologic risk of vertebral artery (VA) injury during atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation between patients with or without RA.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

VA injury is a potentially serious complication during atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation. Although this operation is frequently performed on RA patients, there have been few comparative studies on the morphologic risk of VA injury between RA and non-RA patients.

METHODS

A total of 107 three-dimensional computed tomography images of the cervical spine including the C1-C2 complex were evaluated. Forty-seven RA patients and 60 non-RA patients were included in the study. The maximum atlantoaxial transarticular screw diameter (MSD) that could be inserted without breaching the cortex was measured 3-dimensionally using a computer- assisted navigation system. A high-riding-VA carrier was defined as a patient with either MSD of 4 mm or less. In RA patients, the space available for the spinal cord in flexion (SAC in flexion), duration of disease, RA stage, and type of disease were examined.

RESULTS

In the RA group, 45 of 94 MSDs (47.9%) were 4 mm or less, and 33 of 47 patients (70.2%) were high-riding-VA carriers. In the non-RA group, 11 of 120 MSDs (9.2%) were 4 mm or less, and 9 of 60 (15.0%) patients were high-riding-VA carriers. MSD, C3 A-P diameter, and the ratio of MSD to C3 A-P diameter were significantly smaller in the RA group than in the non-RA group. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that SAC in flexion was a significant risk factor for a high-riding-VA carrier in the RA group.

CONCLUSION

RA was a significant risk factor for the presence of a high-riding VA. When performing atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation, particularly on RA patients, thorough preoperative evaluation of the bony architecture is of great importance to avoid inadvertent VA injury.

Treatment of upper cervical spine involvement in rheumatoid arthritis patients

The cervical spine, especially the upper cervical spine, is a common focus of destruction by rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Because of its potentially debilitating and life-threatening sequelae, cervical spine involvement remains a priority in the diagnosis and treatment of RA. Many studies show that early surgical intervention gives a more satisfactory outcome. Surgery aims to establish spinal stability and to prevent neurological deterioration and injury to the spinal cord, leading to improved neurological function. The recent sophisticated screw-rod-plate technique allows one to obtain a solid fixation of the upper cervical spine with a high possibility of bone union even in RA patients. Although surgery of the occipitoatlantoaxial region is a challenge with many possibilities of serious complications, recent advances in the surgical technique, complete understanding of the anatomy, and precise preoperative evaluation have decreased complication rates. Early consultation with a specialized spine surgeon is mandatory once cervical involvement is suspected in an RA patient because once the patient becomes myelopathic, the rate of long-term mortality increases and the chance of neurological recovery decreases.

Vertebral artery injury during cervical spine surgery: a survey of more than 5600 operations

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective survey.

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the present incidence and management of iatrogenic vertebral artery injury (VAI) during cervical spine surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

VAI is a rare complication of cervical spine surgery, but it may be catastrophic. Anterior cervical decompression (ACD) and posterior atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation (Magerl fixation) have been the main causes, with reported incidences of 0.3% to 0.5% and 0% to 8.2%, respectively. Popular new surgical techniques, such as cervical pedicle screw or C1 lateral mass screw fixation, also entail the potential risk of VAI.

METHODS

A questionnaire was sent to our affiliated hospitals requesting information regarding iatrogenic VAI during cervical spine surgery.

RESULTS

Seven spine surgeon groups and 25 general orthopedist groups responded to the questionnaire, with a response rate of 89%. The overall incidence of VAI was 0.14% (8 cases among 5641 cervical spine surgeries). The incidence in anterior cervical decompression procedures was 0.18% and that in Magerl fixation was 1.3%. Inexperienced surgeons tended to commit VAI more frequently. One case of VAI during C1 lateral mass screw fixation was included, whereas there was no case of VAI caused by cervical pedicle screw fixation. In the case of "VAI in the screw hole," hemostasis was obtained by tamponade or screw insertion, whereas "VAI in the open space" sometimes caused uncontrollable bleeding, in which embolization eventually stopped the bleeding. There were no deaths or apparent neurologic sequelae.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of VAI during cervical spine surgery from this survey was similar to or slightly less than that in the literature. Tamponade was effective in many cases, but prompt consultation with an endovascular team is recommended if the bleeding is uncontrollable. Preoperative careful evaluation of the vertebral artery seems to be most important to prevent iatrogenic VAI and to avoid postoperative neurologic sequelae.

Relationship of the internal carotid artery to the anterior aspect of the C1 vertebra: implications for C1-C2 transarticular and C1 lateral mass fixation

STUDY DESIGN

Anatomic study of the internal carotid artery (ICA) location with respect to C1 based on computed tomography (CT) scans with contrast medium.

OBJECTIVE

To measure the location of the ICA relative to the anterior aspect of C1 to assess the risk of placing C1-C2 transarticular or C1 lateral mass screws.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Vertebral artery injury is a known risk from placement of screws in C1. A previous case report revealed an ideally placed C1-C2 transarticular screw abutting and narrowing the ICA. The risk of ICA injury from C1 screws is unknown.

METHODS

Fifty random head and neck CT scans with contrast medium were retrospectively analyzed. Measurements were taken bilaterally including the closest distance from the ICA lumen to C1 and the distance from the medial edge of the ICA to a line drawn along the medial border of the foramen transversarium. The risk of inserting bicortical C1-C2 transarticular and C1 lateral mass screws was estimated based on these measurements.

RESULTS

The mean distance from the ICA to C1 was 2.88 mm on the left and 2.89 mm on the right. The ICA lumen was medial to the foramen transversarium in 42 (84%) of 50 cases (mean: 2.78 mm on the left and 3.00 mm on the right). The proximity of the ICA to C1 posed moderate risk in 46% of cases and high risk in 12% (on at least one side).

CONCLUSION

Because of the risk of ICA injury from a drill bit or the tip of a bicortical screw, we recommend preoperative CT scan with contrast medium in all cases in which a screw is to be placed into C1. If the ICA is in close proximity to the anterior border of C1, unicortical fixation or a different fusion technique should be considered.

Odontoid fractures in the elderly: dorsal C1/C2 fusion is superior to halo-vest immobilization

BACKGROUND

Odontoid fractures in geriatric patients occur frequently and are associated with a high morbidity and mortality. The decision for operative or nonoperative therapy is still controversial. Recent studies confirmed that external stabilization with halo-vest immobilization is associated with high complication rates and mortality. An operation has a high perioperative risk because of comorbidities, but previous data suggest improved outcome in this group.

METHODS

To test this hypothesis, we retrospectively analyzed geriatric patients that underwent operation for isolated unstable type II odontoid fractures (Anderson and D'Alonzo classification) in our institution between March 2003 and March 2005. Twenty-seven patients (17 female, 10 male) with a median age of 85.5 (range, 63-98) years were stabilized by posterior C1/C2 fusion with transarticular screws and an additional modified Gallie fusion with a bone graft. Postoperatively, a rigid cervical collar was applied for 6 to 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Six patients died during the observation period (median, 40 days after trauma). Three patients (11%) died perioperatively (cardiac or pulmonary failure, pneumonia), and the other three died as a result of the same after discharge. All 21 surviving patients were reevaluated an average of 3 months after trauma. All but one showed a stable fusion, and all reported no or minor neck pain. No wound infections occurred; one reoperation was necessary for screw misplacement. An initial neurologic deficit improved in two of three cases. Patients were mobilized on day 1 after operation. About two-thirds of patients were discharged directly home.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior stabilization of unstable odontoid fractures with transarticular screws and modified Gallie fusion in old patients can be performed safely, with good clinical results and few complications. However, mortality remains high, but is lower than reported after halo-vest immobilization alone. Dorsal C1/C2 Fusion is superior to halo-vest immobilization in terms of nonunion rate and mortality. Thus, it might be the treatment of choice in this high-risk patient population.

Biomechanical comparison of C1-C2 posterior arthrodesis techniques

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical comparison of 5 atlantoaxial posterior arthrodesis techniques.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relative value of different posterior wire constructs when one or two transarticular screws are used.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

A combination of Gallie or Brooks techniques and 2 posterior transarticular screws has been shown to be effective for atlantoaxial arthrodesis. Anatomic constraints may preclude the insertion of a transarticular screw unilaterally or bilaterally.

METHODS

Ten adult human cadaveric upper cervical spine specimens were used. The specimens were tested intact, after odontoidectomy and transverse and capsular ligament section and after stabilization with each of the 5 techniques: Brooks-Jenkins cable fixation, Brooks-Jenkins with unilateral transarticular screw, Gallie posterior wire construct with unilateral transarticular screw, Brooks-Jenkins with bilateral screws, and Gallie with bilateral screws. Pure moments were applied in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and torsion within physiologic limits (<1.5 Nm).

RESULTS

In flexion-extension and lateral bending, the range of motion (ROM) and neutral zone (NZ) increased significantly after the specimens were injured as compared with intact spines (P < 0.001). After stabilization, the ROM and NZ were significantly lower than in injured and intact spines in all motions (P < 0.01) except lateral bending in the intact spine. Among the 5 instrumented techniques, the ROM for the Gallie construct with 1 screw was significantly higher than for the Brooks-Jenkins construct with 1 or 2 screws in flexion-extension (P < 0.05). In axial torsion, the Gallie construct with 1 screw displayed a larger NZ and ROM than any of the other 4 constructs (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Gallie or Brooks-Jenkins cable fixation alone may not be adequate for atlantoaxial arthrodesis. If 2 supplemented transarticular screws can beinserted, there is no difference between the Gallie or Brooks techniques. If only a single screw can be inserted, the Brooks-Jenkins technique is recommended rather than a Gallie technique.

Atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation with morselized autograft and without additional internal fixation: technical description and report of 57 cases

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective clinical and radiologic evaluation of posterior C1-C2 fusion by transarticular screw (TAS) with morselized autograft and without additional internal fixation.

OBJECTIVE

Description and assessment of a modified Magerl technique.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The majority of spine surgeons prefer to supplement the posterior TAS with a posterior cable-secured strut graft and a postoperative rigid cervical orthosis. Our hypotheses are that the 2 posterior TASs alone are enough for stabilization and that morselized cancellous grafts have similar clinical result as the structural graft.

METHODS

Fifty-seven consecutive patients, including atlantoaxial instability in 52 and atlantoaxial dislocation in 5, were treated by bilateral TAS fixation alone with morselized grafts by the same surgeon. The postoperative external immobilization was abandoned.

RESULTS

A total of 114 transarticular screws were placed. Radiographs demonstrated all the screws were placed satisfactorily except two. One screw penetrated into the occipito-atlantal joint, and the other one slightly breached the vertebral artery groove but did not injure vertebral artery. None of these 2 screws was associated with clinical sequelae. There were 2 patients who had postoperative iatrogenic C2-C3 instability on dynamic radiograph, which did not need treatment. These cases had an average follow-up of 47 months (range, 24-76 months). All patients attained solid fusion without screw failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral transarticular screws alone and morselized grafts have high fusion rate in atlantoaxial arthrodesis without instrument failure. TAS fixation could provide stability that is clinically equivalent to the standard screws plus tension band construct as described by Magerl. With anatomic reduction and ideal screw position, additional internal fixation and postoperative collar are not necessary.

Safe atlantoaxial fixation using a laminar screw (intralaminar screw) in a patient with unilateral occlusion of vertebral artery: case report

STUDY DESIGN

A case of atlantoaxial fusion using an intralaminar (unilateral-crossing laminar screw) screw is presented in a patient with unilateral vertebral artery communication with the basilar artery.

OBJECTIVES

To document the significance of the intralaminar screw technique in the aforementioned case.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Vertebral artery injury is directly linked with intraoperative or perioperative death if the vertebral artery communicates only unilaterally to the basilar artery or has an obvious dominant side. In this situation, irrespective of whether the pedicle is confirmed to be sufficient for pedicle screw placement, if the vertebral artery is violated, fatal complications will occur. The literature reports that even proficient surgeons cannot guarantee 100% accuracy in pedicle screw placement. The intralaminar screw technique is currently the safest with regard to avoiding violation of the vertebral artery. Biomechanical studies have also shown this technique to ensure sufficient strength.

METHODS

The patient had rheumatoid atlantoaxial subluxation, and the right vertebral artery alone communicated with basilar artery, while the left ended blind. She underwent atlantoaxial fixation with an intralaminar screw (unilateral-crossing laminar screw) of the axis and lateral mass atlas screws inserted via the posterior arch.

RESULTS

The intralaminar screw (unilateral-crossing laminar screw) was completed, and comprised lateral mass atlas screws and rods. There were no complications during and after surgery. Good bone union was achieved.

CONCLUSION

Patients with unilateral dominant vertebral artery are good candidates for the intralaminar screw technique, even if the pedicle anatomy is sufficient to insert pedicle screws.

Atlantoaxial fixation using the polyaxial screw-rod system

The aim of this study is to evaluate the first results of the atlantoaxial fixation using polyaxial screw-rod system. Twenty-eight patients followed-up 12-29 months (average 17.1 months) were included in this study. The average age was 59.5 years (range 23-89 years). The atlantoaxial fusion was employed in 20 patients for an acute injury to the upper cervical spine, in 1 patient with rheumatoid arthritis for atlantoaxial vertical instability, in 1 patient for C1-C2 osteoarthritis, in 2 patients for malunion of the fractured dens. Temporary fixation was applied in two patients for type III displaced fractures of the dens and in two patients for the atlantoaxial rotatory dislocation. Retrospectively, we evaluated operative time, intraoperative bleeding and the interval of X-ray exposure. The resulting condition was subjectively evaluated by patients. We evaluated also the placement, direction and length of the screws. Fusion or stability in the temporary fixation was evaluated on radiographs taken at 3, 6, 12 weeks and 6 and 12 months after the surgery. As concerns complications, intraoperatively we monitored injury of the nerve structures and the vertebral artery. Monitoring of postoperative complications was focused on delayed healing of the wound, breaking or loosening of screws and development of malunion. Operative time ranged from 35 to 155 min, (average 83 min). Intraoperative blood loss ranged from 50 to 1,500 ml (average 540 ml). The image intensifier was used for a period of 24 s to 2 min 36 s (average 1 min 6 s). Within the postoperative evaluation, four patients complained of paresthesia in the region innervated by the greater occipital nerve. A total of 56 screws were inserted into C1, their length ranged from 26 to 34 mm (average, 30.8 mm). All screws were positioned correctly in the C1 lateral mass. Another 56 screws were inserted into C2. Their length ranged from 28 to 36 mm (average 31.4 mm). Three screws were malpositioned: one screw perforated the spinal canal and two screws protruded into the vertebral artery canal. C1-C2 stability was achieved in all patients 12 weeks after the surgery. No clinically manifested injury of the vertebral artery or nerve structures was observed in any of these cases. As for postoperative complications, we recorded wound dehiscence in one patient. The Harms C1-C2 fixation is a very effective method of stabilizing the atlantoaxial complex. The possibility of a temporary fixation without damage to the atlantoaxial joints and of reduction after the screws and rods had been inserted is quite unique.

Hypoglossal nerve palsy after posterior screw placement on the C-1 lateral mass. Case report

Atlantoaxial fixation in which C1-2 screw-rod fixation is performed is a relatively new method. Because reports about this technique are rather scant, little is known about its associated complications. In this report the authors introduce hypoglossal nerve palsy as a complication of this novel posterior atlantoaxial stabilization method. A 67-year-old man underwent a C1-2 screw-rod fixation for persistent neck pain resulting from a Type 2 odontoid fracture that involved disruption of the transverse atlantal ligament. Posterior instrumentation in which a C-1 lateral mass screw and C-2 pedicle screw were placed was performed. Postoperatively, the patient suffered dysphagia with deviation of the tongue to the left side. At the 4-month follow-up examination, bone fusion was noted on plain x-ray studies of the cervical spine. His hypoglossal nerve palsy resolved completely 2 months postoperatively. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first report in the literature of hypoglossal nerve palsy following C1-2 screw-rod fixation. The hypoglossal nerve is one of the structures that can be damaged during C-1 lateral mass screw placement.

Biomechanical comparison of four C1 to C2 rigid fixative techniques: anterior transarticular, posterior transarticular, C1 to C2 pedicle, and C1 to C2 intralaminar screws

OBJECTIVE

We performed a biomechanical comparison of several C1 to C2 fixation techniques including crossed laminar (intralaminar) screw fixation, anterior C1 to C2 transarticular screw fixation, C1 to 2 pedicle screw fixation, and posterior C1 to C2 transarticular screw fixation.

METHODS

Eight cadaveric cervical spines were tested intact and after dens fracture. Four different C1 to C2 screw fixation techniques were tested. Posterior transarticular and pedicle screw constructs were tested twice, once with supplemental sublaminar cables and once without cables. The specimens were tested in three modes of loading: flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. All tests were performed in load and torque control. Pure bending moments of 2 nm were applied in flexion-extension and lateral bending, whereas a 1 nm moment was applied in axial rotation. Linear displacements were recorded from extensometers rigidly affixed to the C1 and C2 vertebrae. Linear displacements were reduced to angular displacements using trigonometry.

RESULTS

Adding cable fixation results in a stiffer construct for posterior transarticular screws. The addition of cables did not affect the stiffness of C1 to C2 pedicle screw constructs. There were no significant differences in stiffness between anterior and posterior transarticular screw techniques, unless cable fixation was added to the posterior construct. All three posterior screw constructs with supplemental cable fixation provide equal stiffness with regard to flexion-extension and axial rotation. C1 lateral mass-C2 intralaminar screw fixation restored resistance to lateral bending but not to the same degree as the other screw fixation techniques.

CONCLUSION

All four screw fixation techniques limit motion at the C1 to 2 articulation. The addition of cable fixation improves resistance to flexion and extension for posterior transarticular screw fixation.

Atlantoaxial stabilization with the use of C1–3 lateral mass screw fixation

✓ Atlantoaxial stabilization has evolved from simple posterior wiring to transarticular screw fixation. In some patients, however, the course of the vertebral artery (VA) through the axis varies, and therefore transarticular screw placement is not always feasible. For these patients, the authors have developed a novel method of atlantoaxial stabilization that does not require axial screws. In this paper, they describe the use of this technique in the first 10 cases.

Ten consecutive patients underwent the combined C1–3 lateral mass–sublaminar axis cable fixation technique. The mean age of the patients was 62.6 years (range 23–84 years). There were six men and four women. Eight patients were treated after traumatic atlantoaxial instability developed (four had remote trauma and previous nonunion), whereas in the other two atlantoaxial instability was caused by arthritic degeneration. All had VA anatomy unsuitable to traditional transarticular screw fixation.

There were no intraoperative complications in any of the patients. Postoperative computed tomography studies demonstrated excellent screw positioning in each patient. Nine patients were treated postoperatively with the aid of a rigid cervical orthosis. The remaining patient was treated using a halo fixation device. One patient died of respiratory failure 2 months after surgery. Follow-up data (mean follow-up duration 13.1 months) were available for seven of the remaining nine patients and demonstrated a stable construct with fusion in each patient.

The authors present an effective alternative method in which C1–3 lateral mass screw fixation is used to treat patients with unfavorable anatomy for atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation. In this series of 10 patients, the method was a safe and effective way to provide stabilization in these anatomically difficult patients.

Comparison of the anatomical risk for vertebral artery injury associated with the C2-pedicle screw and atlantoaxial transarticular screw

STUDY DESIGN

We evaluated the trajectories of atlantoaxial transarticular and C2-pedicle screws in 3 dimensions using computerized tomography.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the anatomic risk for vertebral artery injury associated with C2-pedicle and atlantoaxial transarticular screws.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The atlantoaxial fixation technique using C1-lateral mass screws combined with C2-pedicle screws is considered a safer technique for preventing vertebral artery injury than atlantoaxial transarticular fixation. However, few reports have compared the anatomic risk of vertebral artery injury associated with C2-pedicle screws with that of transarticular screws.

METHODS

A total of 62 consecutive patients with cervical lesions were evaluated using 3-dimensional images reconstructed by a computer-assisted navigation system. We compared the maximum possible diameters of the atlantoaxial transarticular screw and C2-pedicle screw trajectories, and examined whether the maximum possible diameters were limited by the height or width of the bony structure in screw trajectories < or = 4 mm in diameter.

RESULTS

Mean maximum possible diameters did not differ significantly between the trajectories of 124 atlantoaxial transarticular and 124 C2-pedicle screws. In screw trajectories < or = 4 mm in diameter, 57.1% of transarticular screw trajectories were limited by the height of the bony structure, and all pedicle screw trajectories were limited by the width.

CONCLUSIONS

C2-pedicle screw placement has nearly the same anatomic risk of vertebral artery injury as transarticular screw placement. Preoperative 3-dimensional evaluation may be useful for choosing the best surgical technique.

Relation between atlantoaxial (C1/2) and cervical alignment (C2-C7) angles with Magerl and Brooks techniques for atlantoaxial subluxation in rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

A few studies have reported the relation between the atlantoaxial (C1/2) angle and cervical alignment (C2-C7) angle after a Magerl and Brooks (M&B) surgical procedure to treat atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, no study has examined an optimum preoperative C1/2 angle reduction. We aimed to assess the relation between the C1/2 angle reduction and the C2-C7 angle change in patients with progressive RA who underwent the M&B procedure.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the relation between the preoperative C1/2 angle and C2-C7 angle in 28 consecutive RA patients using their clinical and radiological data. Differences in the preoperative and postoperative C1/2 and C2-C7 angles were detected. Correlations of these angles and the reduced degree of angles were examined. The Ranawat grading scale and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were used to determine myelopathy. Pain was categorized into five categories according to severity. Clinical and X-ray evaluations were collected before surgery, at 3 and/or 6 months after surgery, and at final follow-up.

RESULTS

Clinical symptoms, Ranawat grade, and JOA scores improved postoperatively, and patients achieved bony union within 3 months. We observed a strong and significant correlation between the reduced C1/2 angle and the change in the C2-C7 angle. Patients with a preoperative C1/2 angle of <20 degrees had markedly reduced cervical lordotic angle but this condition was not seen in patients with a preoperative C1/2 angle of >or=20 degrees . The optimum C1/2 angle was estimated as [20 degrees - (preoperative C1/2 angle)] in patients with a C1/2 angle <20 degrees or as an in situ angle in patients with a C1/2 angle of >or=20 degrees .

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons performing the M&B procedure need to select patients carefully and avoid complete or overreduction of the C1/2 angle to prevent serious postoperative SAS and myelopathy.

Anterior retropharyngeal fixation C1-2 for stabilization of atlantoaxial instabilities: study of feasibility, technical description and preliminary results

Posterior transarticular screw fixation C1-2 with the Magerl technique is a challenging procedure for stabilization of atlantoaxial instabilities. Although its high primary stability favoured it to sublaminar wire-based techniques, the close merging of the vertebral artery (VA) and its violation during screw passage inside the axis emphasizes its potential risk. Also, posterior approach to the upper cervical spine produces extensive, as well as traumatic soft-tissue stripping. In comparison, anterior transarticular screw fixation C1-2 is an atraumatic technique, but has been neglected in the literature, even though promising results are published and lectured to date. In 2004, anterior screw fixation C1-2 was introduced in our department for the treatment of atlantoaxial instabilities. As it showed convincing results, its general anatomic feasibility was worked up. The distance between mid-sagittal line of C2 and medial border of the VA groove resembles the most important anatomic landmark in anterior transarticular screw fixation C1-2. Therefore, CT based measurements on 42 healthy specimens without pathology of the cervical spine were performed. Our data are compiled in an extended collection of anatomic landmarks relevant for anterior transarticular screw fixation C1-2. Based on anatomic findings, the technique and its feasibility in daily clinical work is depicted and discussed on our preliminary results in seven patients.

Posterior atlantoaxial three-point fixation: comparison of intraoperative performance between open and percutaneous techniques

INTRODUCTION

Atlantoaxial instabilities, which require surgical fixation follow a variety of clinical disorders. Different surgical procedures are used for stabilization of the atlantoaxial complex, mainly posterior wiring techniques and transarticular screw fixation. Nowadays, often a combination of transarticular screws and a posterior one-point fixation is used to achieve a three-point fixation, with superior biomechanical stability and good clinical results. Different modifications were developed to improve this technique. In 1995, a percutaneous approach for atlantoaxial stabilization was introduced. In clinical studies, the technique showed a tendency towards better outcome. Beside the outcome, the intraoperative performance is of special interest for minimal invasive approaches. We therefore compared the operation time, screw angulation and blood loss, between the open and percutaneous posterior atlantoaxial techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two groups, each consisting of 17 patients, with either open (group 1) or percutaneous (group 2) atlantoxial stabilization, were compared. The operation time was retrospectively acquired from the patient's charts. The data for blood loss was provided by our anaesthesiological department, separated for intraoperative, postoperative and total blood loss. Screw angulation was measured on the postoperative x-ray by an orthopaedic surgeon.

RESULTS

The percutaneous group showed an average intraoperative blood loss of 239.7 ml, compared to 929.4 ml for the open group (p< or =0.001). The analogue values for the postoperative blood loss were 142.9 ml and 379.4 ml for group 2 and group 1, respectively (p=0.008). Consecutively, the total blood loss showed also a statistically significant difference (p< or =0.001). The operation time was significantly different (p< or =0.001), with average values of 175.3 min (group 1) and 110.6 min (group 2). Screw angulation showed a trend towards a steeper angulation in the percutaneous group with an average angle of 56.8 degrees , compared to 53.9 degrees (group 1), although this was not statistically significant (p=0.053).

CONCLUSION

The percutaneous technique for atlantoaxial stabilization with a three-point fixation has clear intraoperative benefits, with shorter operation time and reduced blood loss. A trend towards steeper screw angulation was found and shows at least equal feasibility for transarticular screw placement with the percutaneous technique, compared to the standard open approach.

Percutaneous placement of posterior cervical screws using three-dimensional fluoroscopy

STUDY DESIGN

The placement of percutaneous posterior cervical screws using three-dimensional fluoroscopic guidance was performed in intact human cadaver specimens.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the accuracy and feasibility of placing entirely percutaneous posterior cervical screws using a novel form of spinal image guidance.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Conventional image guidance has been shown to increase the accuracy of many open cervical instrumentation procedures. There are presently no published studies reporting this novel method for guiding the percutaneous placement of posterior cervical screws.

METHODS

An isocentric C-arm was used to obtain CT images of three intact cadaver specimens. A percutaneous dynamic reference array was attached to the C2 spinous process of each specimen. Light-emitting diodes attached to the C-arm were tracked with an electro-optical camera. The image data set was then transferred to the image-guided workstation, which performed an automated registration. Using the workstation, trajectories were planned for bilateral C1-C2 transarticular, C3-C6 lateral mass, and C7 pedicle screw placement. Through 1.5-cm incisions, a drill guide fitted with light-emitting diodes was used for sequential, image-guided drilling, tapping, and placement of cannulated 4.0 mm screws at each level. Postprocedure, thin-cut CT scanning was used to determine the accuracy of screw placement.

RESULTS

A total of 41 of 42 percutaneous screws (97.6%) were accurately placed. All of the transarticular atlantoaxial and subaxial lateral mass screws showed no evidence of foramen transversarium, neural foramen, or facet joint violation. One of the C7 pedicle screws had a minor cortical wall violation.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the feasibility of placing percutaneous posterior cervical screws. Three-dimensional fluoroscopy appears to enable highly accurate, percutaneous three-dimensional cervical spine navigation.

Virtual placement of posterior C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation

We wanted to evaluate how often safe and effective posterior C1-C2 transarticular screw placement is realizable when it is performed according to guidelines given in the literature. In 50 adult patients, computerized tomography scan data from C0 to C3 were transformed into a 3D spine model. Virtually, bilateral screws were placed from the medial third of the C2-C3 facet joint towards the rim of the C1 anterior arc parallel to midline. Three categories of virtual screw position were rated: optimal (virtual screw inside the C2 pars interarticularis, transversing the middle third of the atlantoaxial joint, and sparing the vertebral artery canal), suboptimal (virtual screw violating the C2 pars interarticularis, and/or transversing the lower or upper third of the C1-C2 joint, and sparing vertebral artery canal), and unacceptable (virtual screw breaching the vertebral artery canal). Optimal placement was seen in 74, suboptimal placement in 11, and unacceptable locations in 15 sites. We conclude that due to the variability of the anatomy of the upper cervical spine, optimal transarticular C1-C2 screw placement is not possible in up to 26%, and even hazardous in up to 15%.

Frameless Stereotactic Image-Guided C1-C2 Transarticular Screw Fixation for Atlantoaxial Instability

OBJECTIVE

We retrospectively studied 20 adults who underwent C1-C2 transarticular screw (TAS) fixation utilizing frameless stereotaxy.

METHODS

The study group comprised 13 men and 7 women, with a mean age of 63 years (range 12-87 years). All patients demonstrated clinical and radiographic evidence of C1-C2 instability. The cause of the instability was trauma in 11 patients, rheumatoid arthritis in 6 patients, failed prior surgery in 2 patients, and congenital malformation in 1 patient. All patients underwent stabilization with C1-C2 TASs using image-guided frameless stereotaxy.

RESULTS

There were no new or worsening neurologic symptoms reported at 18-month follow-up. Motor weakness improved in seven of nine patients, myelopathy in seven of seven, and gait in three of six patients in whom these deficits were present preoperatively. Postoperative complications included one surgical site abscess, one cutaneous pressure ulcer, and one iliac crest donor site infection. Of 36 screws placed, 33 (92%) were well positioned. Normal C1-C2 alignment was achieved in 17 of 20 (85%) patients. In 4 of 20 cases, screw implant, which was thought to be anatomically difficult, if not impossible, on the basis of routine magnetic resonance or computed tomography imaging, was actually accomplished successfully using surgical navigation.

CONCLUSIONS

C1-C2 TAS placement is a safe and accurate surgical technique that may improve neurologic function. Use of intraoperative navigation can facilitate achieving difficult surgical trajectories that match the patient's anatomy, thus allowing TAS implant in patients who otherwise would not be candidates for this type of internal fixation.

Poor surgical technique in cervical plating leading to vertebral artery injury and brain stem infarction—case report

BACKGROUND

Lateral mass plating is a safe fixating system for lower cervical fractures. Brain stem infarction after cervical lateral mass screw plating has not been reported in previous literature. We report a case of poor surgical technique leading to vertebral artery injury and brain stem infarction after cervical lateral mass plating.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 41-year-old male patient was transferred to our hospital because of hemiparesis and dysarthria immediately after lateral mass plating for fracture and dislocation of the fifth and sixth cervical vertebrae. Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed infarction of the left posterior inferior cerebellar artery territory, and the vertebral artery angiography showed complete occlusion of the left vertebral artery. The cervical computed tomography revealed a left screw of the fifth and sixth cervical vertebrae penetrating the central portion of the transverse foramen. The patient was managed with anticoagulant and supportive therapy only, with subsequent improvement of hemiparesis and dysarthria.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor surgical technique of lateral mass plating in the cervical spine could lead to vertebral artery injury and even brain stem infarction. Postoperative brain infarction in cervical fusion could be a complication of the usually safe lateral mass plating of the cervical spine.

Surgical management of odontoid fractures

Odontoid fractures account for approximately 20% of all cervical fractures, with the majority being type II fractures according to the Anderson and D'Alonzo classification. The treatment of odontoid fractures is determined by multiple factors, including fracture type, presence of associated injuries, patient age, and patient comorbidities. It is generally well accepted that type I and type III injuries heal well with non-operative treatment. However, some type I injuries can be seen in association with occipito-atlantal dislocation; and some type III fractures can be closer to the neck of the odontoid (high and shallow based), and may act like a type II fracture, that is, with an increased probability of nonunion. The treatment of type II fractures remains controversial. Over the past decade, internal fixation has become an accepted treatment for unstable injuries of the cervical spine. Multiple surgical approaches have been proposed. This article reviews the various alternatives for treating odontoid fractures, attempting to give to the reader a broad perspective on the current techniques, including information taken from evidence-based medicine.

Value of intraoperative true lateral radiograph of C2 pedicle for C1-2 transarticular screw insertion

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Transarticular C1-2 screws are widely used in posterior cervical spine instrumentation. Injury to the vertebral artery during insertion of transarticular Cl-2 screw remains a serious complication. Use of a computer-assisted surgery system decreases this complication considerably. However, this system encounters problems in ensuring complete accuracy because of positional variations during preoperative and intraoperative imaging generation. Therefore, intraoperative fluoroscopy still is one of the commonly used methods to guide insertion of transarticular Cl-2 screw. Evaluation of a true lateral radiographic view of the C2 pedicle for screw trajectory during C1-2 transarticular screw insertion may help to minimize this potential complication.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the value of intraoperative true lateral radiograph of the C2 pedicle for screw trajectory during C1-2 transarticular screw insertion.

STUDY DESIGN

To compare the height of the C2 pedicle area allowing instrumentation on true lateral view radiograph of the C2 pedicle and computed tomographic (CT) scan with multiplanar reconstruction.

METHODS

Twenty embalmed human cadaveric cervical spine specimens were used to insert a total of 40 C1-2 transarticular screws using Magerl and Seemann technique. One side of the C2 transverse foramen was filled with radiopaque material (lead oxide) to simulate the artery and to demarcate the danger zone for better visualization on radiography. Measurements and calculation of the mean and standard deviation of the height of the area allowing instrumentation of the C2 pedicle were done on true lateral view radiograph of the C2 pedicle, the sagittal and 30 degrees sagittal views relative to the frontal plane passing exactly through the center of the C2 pedicle of CT scans. Student t test was applied to calculate the statistical significance of measured values. Statistical significance was defined as p<or=.001.

RESULTS

On true lateral radiographic views of the C2 pedicle, the height of the area allowing instrumentation of the pedicle was 7.75+/-0.92 mm (right) and 7.64+/-0.63 (left), p>or=.36. Using sagittal CT scan views, the height of pedicles was 7.71+/-0.7 mm (right) and 7.58+/-1.01 mm (left), p>or=.23. On 30 degrees sagittal CT scan views, the height of pedicles was 7.84+/-1.00 mm (right) and 7.76+/-1.02 mm (left), p>or=.27. The p value was >or=.78, >or=.56, and >or=.49 for true lateral radiographic view and sagittal CT scan view, true lateral radiographic view and 30 degrees sagittal CT scan view, and sagittal CT scan view and 30 degrees sagittal CT scan views, respectively. On lateral view of cervical spine, the decline angle of the transarticular screw was 51.3+/-0.50 degrees (right) and 50.68+/-0.41 degrees (left), p>or=.17. Mean decline angle was 51+/-0.43 degrees . On the anteroposterior (AP) view, radiograph median angle was 6.87+/-0.53 degrees (right) and 6.0+/-0.59 degrees (left), p>or=.25. Mean median angle was 6.44+/-0.62 degrees.

CONCLUSIONS

True lateral radiographic views of the pedicles provide useful information for defining screw trajectory intraoperatively. Using this view along with AP and lateral view of cervical spine and preoperative three-dimensional CT scan may narrow the margin of error in this delicate area.

Atlantoaxial fusion using anterior transarticular screw fixation of C1-C2: technical innovation and biomechanical study

This study is an attempt to describe a new technique for anterior transarticular screw fixation of the atlantoaxial joints, and to compare the stability of this construct to posterior transarticular screw fixation with and without laminar cerclage wiring. Nine human cadaveric specimens were included in this study. The C1-C2 motion segment was instrumented using either anterior transarticular screws (group 1), posterior transarticular screws alone (group 2), or posterior screws with interlaminar cerclage wires (group 3). Using an unconstrained mechanical testing machine, the specimens were tested in rotation, lateral bending, and flexion-extension using nondestructive loads of +/-2 N m. The specimens were also tested in translation using nondestructive loads of +/-100 N. All values for the three groups with regards to anterior-posterior displacement, rotation, and lateral bending were similar as determined using a Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test with a significance level of p<0.05. The only significant difference was registered in flexion-extension where the cerclage wire added some strength to the construct. Anterior transarticular screw fixation of the atlantoaxial spine has several advantages over posterior fixation techniques, and is as stable as posterior transarticular fixation in all clinically significant planes of motion. The addition of posterior interlaminar cerclage wiring further improves resistance to flexion-extension forces. Anterior transarticular screw fixation of the atlantoaxial joint is a useful technique for achieving C1-C2 stabilization.

An anatomical study comparing standard fluoroscopy and virtual fluoroscopy for the placement of C1–2 transarticular screws

Object. The authors sought to compare radiation exposure, surgical time, and accuracy of screw placement when using either standard fluoroscopy or virtual fluoroscopy for the placement of C1–2 transarticular screws.

Methods. Twenty-two C1–2 transarticular screws were placed in 11 cadavers in a randomized and alternating order by using either standard fluoroscopy or virtual fluoroscopy (fluoronavigation). The radiation time, procedure time, and accuracy of screw placement were recorded and statistically compared. A small but statistically significant reduction in fluoroscopy time was noted with the virtual fluoroscopy technique but the surgical times were similar between the two techniques. The incidence of noncritical and critical breaches (those at risk of causing a neurovascular injury) was not significantly different between the two groups. Careful analysis of the C1–2 anatomy in these specimens underscored the importance of placing the screw path in a maximally dorsal and medial portion of the C-2 isthmus to avoid injury to the vertebral artery and to maximize the bone purchase of the C-1 lateral mass.

Conclusions. Although virtual fluoroscopy may represent a useful tool for transarticular screw placement, it does not supplant traditional surgical techniques and does not appear to lower the incidence of bone breaches that can occur when performing this demanding procedure.