The safety of aprotinin and lysine-derived antifibrinolytic drugs in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis

Tranexamic acid in cardiac surgery: is there a cause for concern?

The withdrawal of marketing approval for aprotinin resulted in more clinicians administering tranexamic acid to patients at increased risk of bleeding and adverse outcome. The latest in a series of retrospective analyses of observational data is published in Critical Care and suggests an increase in mortality, when compared to data from the aprotinin era, in those patients having surgery when a cardiac chamber is opened. The added observation of an increase in cerebral excitatory phenomena (seizure activity) with tranexamic acid has a known mechanism and questions if such patients should be given this drug.

Mechanism of hemostasis defects and management of bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndromes

The main cause of the hemostasis defects and related bleeding complications in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are the intake of multiple antithrombotic drugs, alone or concomitantly with invasive procedures such as coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Antithrombotic drugs that impair several phases of hemostasis (platelet function, coagulation, and fibrinolysis) are causing bleeding particularly in elderly patients, in those underweight and with comorbidities such as renal insufficiency, diabetes, hypertension and malignancy. Identification of patients at high risk of bleeding is the most important preventive strategy, because the choice and dosages of drugs may to some extent be tailored to the degree of risk. Transfusions of blood products, which may become necessary in patients with major bleeding, should be used with caution, because they are associated with adverse cardiovascular events. To reduce the need of transfusion, the hemostatic drugs that decrease blood loss and transfusion requirements in cardiac surgery (antifibrinolytic amino acids, desmopressin, and recombinant factor VIIa) might be considered. However, the efficacy of these drugs in the control of bleeding complications is not unequivocally established in ACS and there is concern for an increased risk of thrombosis. In conclusion, evidence-based recommendations for the management of bleeding in patients with ACS are currently lacking, so that prevention through accurate assessment of the individual risk is the most valid strategy.

Adverse drug events associated with disorders of coagulation

Disorders of coagulation are common adverse drug events encountered in critically ill patients and present a serious concern for intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians. Dosing strategies for medications used in the ICU are typically developed for use in noncritically ill patients and, therefore, do not account for the altered pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties encountered in the critically ill as well as the increased potential for drug-drug interactions, given the far greater number of medications ordered. This substantially increases the risk for coagulation-related adverse reactions, such as a bleeding or prothrombotic events. Although many medications used in the ICU have the potential to cause coagulation disorders, the exact incidence will vary based on the specific medication, dose, concomitant drug therapy, ICU setting, and patient-specific comorbidities. Clinicians must strongly consider these factors when evaluating the risk/benefit ratio for a particular therapy. This review surveys recent literature documenting the risk for adverse drug reactions specific to bleeding and/or clotting with commonly used medications in the ICU.

Mechanisms and specificity of factor XIa and trypsin inhibition by protease nexin 2 and basic pancreatic trypsin inhibitor

Factor XIa (FXIa) inhibition by protease nexin-2 (PN2KPI) was compared with trypsin inhibition by basic pancreatic trypsin inhibitor (BPTI). PN2KPI was a potent inhibitor of FXIa (K(i) ∼ 0.81 nM) and trypsin (K(i) ∼ 0.03 nM), but not of other coagulation proteases (thrombin, FVIIa, FIXa, FXa, FXIIa, plasmin, kallikrein, K(i) > 185 nM). PN2KPI was ∼775-fold more potent than BPTI in FXIa inhibition, but both exhibited similar potencies against trypsin. Studies of FXIa and trypsin inhibition by PN2KPI and BPTI and P1 site swap mutants (PN2KPI-R15 K, BPTI-K15 R) demonstrated that FXIa inhibition by PN2KPI and P1 site swap mutants and trypsin inhibition by PN2KPI and BPTI conform to a single-step, slow equilibration inhibitory mechanism, whereas FXIa-inhibition by BPTI follows a classical, competitive inhibitory mechanism. Mutation of P1 impaired FXIa inhibition by PN2KPI-R15 K ∼14-fold, enhanced FXIa inhibition by BPTI-K15 R ∼150-fold, and had no effect on trypsin inhibition. Arginine at the P1 site of either PN2KPI or BPTI confers high affinity and specificity for FXIa, whereas either arginine or lysine suffices for trypsin inhibition. Thus, PN2KPI is a highly specific inhibitor of FXIa among coagulation enzymes, but the flexibility of trypsin renders it susceptible to inhibition by both wild-type and mutant forms of PN2KPI and BPTI.

Blood loss in major spine surgery: are there effective measures to decrease massive hemorrhage in major spine fusion surgery?

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the definition and incidence of significant hemorrhage in adult spine fusion surgery, and to assess whether measures to decrease hemorrhage are effective.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Significant hemorrhage and associated comorbidities in spine fusion surgery have not yet been clearly identified. Several preoperative and intraoperative techniques are currently available to reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements such as cell saver (CS), recombinant factor VIIa, and perioperative antifibrinolytic agents, such as aprotinin, tranexamic acid, and epsilon-aminocaproic acid. Their effectiveness and safety in spine surgery is uncertain.

METHODS

A systematic review of the English-language literature was undertaken for articles published between January 1990 and April 2009. Electronic databases and reference lists of key articles were searched to identify published studies examining blood loss in major spine surgery. Two independent reviewers assessed the quality of the literature using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria. Disagreements were resolved by consensus.

RESULTS

A total of 90 articles were initially screened, and 17 ultimately met the predetermined inclusion criteria. No studies were found that attempted to define significant hemorrhage in adult spine surgery. We found that there is a high level of evidence that antifibrinolytic agents reduce blood loss and the need of transfusion in adult spine surgery; however, the safety profile of these agents is unclear. There is very low evidence to support the use of CS, recombinant factor VIIa, activated growth factor platelet gel, or normovolemic hemodilution as a method to prevent massive hemorrhage in spine fusion surgery.

CONCLUSION

There is no consensus definition of significant hemorrhage in adult spine fusion surgery. However, definition in the anesthesiology literature of massive blood loss is somewhat arbitrary but is commonly accepted to entail loss of 1 volume of the patient's total blood (60 mL/kg in adults) in <24 hours. On the basis of the current literature, there is little support for routine use of CS during elective spinal surgery. Concerns related to the use of aprotinin were such that our panel of experts unanimously recommended against its use in spine surgery on the basis of the reports of increased complications. With respect to the antifibrinolytics of the lysine analog class (tranexamic acid and aminocaproic acid), on the basis of the available efficacy and safety data, we recommend that they be considered as possible agents to help reduce major hemorrhage in adult spine surgery.

2010 Young Investigator Award winner: Therapeutic aprotinin stimulates osteoblast proliferation but inhibits differentiation and bone matrix mineralization

STUDY DESIGN

Analysis of the effect of antifibrinolytics on in vitro bone formation.

OBJECTIVE

As the direct effect of antifibrinolytics on bone formation is unknown, we examined whether antifibrinolytics routinely used in spine surgery, namely, aprotinin and aminocaproic acid, affect osteoblast function in vitro.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Antifibrinolytics are used in spine surgery to prevent intraoperative blood loss and decrease the need for transfusion. They are either delivered systemically or included as a component of most tissue sealants. Although the role of the fibrinolytic system in wound healing is well established, reports of indirect effects on normal bone biology are emerging. This suggests that the pharmacological targeting of this system may also influence skeletal mass and integrity.

METHODS

Osteoblast progenitor cells were cultured with therapeutic doses of aprotinin and aminocaproic acid. The effect of the antifibrinolytics on osteoblast development was determined by measuring cellular viability and proliferation, quantification of matrix mineralization, and genetic analysis of osteoblast differentiation markers. Protease inhibition profiles of the antifibrinolytics were determined by amidolytic chromogenic assays.

RESULTS

Therapeutic concentrations of aprotinin dose-dependently inhibited plasmin's proteolytic activity, stimulated osteoblast proliferation, and inhibited osteoblast differentiation and matrix mineralization. Aprotinin inhibition of osteoblast differentiation and matrix mineralization could be recovered by removing aprotinin from culture or stimulating cells with bone morphogenetic protein-2 or plasmin. Conversely, aminocaproic acid inhibited plasmin's proteolytic activity significantly less than aprotinin and had no effect on osteoblast proliferation, differentiation, or matrix mineralization in its therapeutic range.

CONCLUSION

These findings demonstrate that the antifibrinolytics have drastically different effects on osteoblasts due in part to different efficacies of protease inhibition. Further, this work suggests that the fibrinolytic proteases and their inhibitors have great potential to regulate bone by affecting the processes that control osteoblast growth and differentiation.

Managing fibrinolysis without aprotinin

Cardiopulmonary bypass increases perioperative bleeding and produces a consumptive coagulopathy, which is defined as the simultaneous production of thrombin and fibrinolysis. Thrombin formation and fibrinolysis primarily occur in the surgical wound and peak at the time heparin is reversed by protamine. Neither aprotinin nor lysine analogs successfully control bleeding in many complex procedures, reoperations, aortic resections, or in implantations of mechanical circulatory devices. This analysis reviews the mechanisms involved and current treatment protocols, with the conclusion that changes in treatment protocols rather than use of a specific anti-fibrinolytic drug may provide better control of bleeding in these patients.

Lessons from aprotinin: is the routine use and inconsistent dosing of tranexamic acid prudent? Meta-analysis of randomised and large matched observational studies

In view of the safety concerns that led to the withdrawal of aprotinin, should antifibrinolytics be used indiscriminately in cardiac surgery? This meta-analysis examines the efficacy and safety profile of tranexamic acid, and in comparison to aprotinin. We identified randomised trials and large observational studies investigating the use tranexamic acid from January 1995 to January 2009 using Pubmed/Cochrane search engine and included them in a two-tier meta-analysis. There were 25 randomised trials and four matched studies with a total of 5411 and 5977 patients, respectively, reporting tranexamic acid use in varying dosages. Tranexamic acid is administered intravenously either as single dose, infusion or both, sometimes added to pump prime or applied topically. Total intravenous dose of tranexamic acid varies from 1g to 20 g, administered over a period of 20 min to 12h. Compared with placebo, tranexamic acid is associated with a lower mean difference in blood loss (random effect -298 ml, 95% confidence [CI] -367 to -229, p<0.001) and decease in rates of re-operation for bleeding by 48%, transfusion of packed red cell by 47% and use of haemostatic blood products by 67%. A non-significant tendency for postoperative neurological events but a decrease in operative mortality was observed in patients treated with tranexamic acid compared with non-treatment group. Compared to aprotinin, tranexamic acid has less effective blood-conserving effect and mortality risk. Given the potential to increase neurological complications, the current trend towards indiscriminate use of tranexamic acid for all cardiac patients needs to be re-evaluated. Further studies are needed to clarify the neurological risk, appropriate indications and dosing of tranexamic acid.

The effect of tranexamic acid on reducing blood loss in cementless total hip arthroplasty under epidural anesthesia

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with high intraoperative and postoperative blood loss. Antifibrinolytic drugs have been used to minimize the potential risks of bleeding and blood transfusion. Studies on the effect of tranexamic acid on decreasing blood loss in THA have revealed interesting results, but most have focused on cemented THA. Yet its benefits in THA, especially in cementless THA, have not been proved. We conducted a prospective double-blind randomized controlled study on 64 patients who were candidates for cementless THA under epidural anesthesia between 2006 and 2008. Patients were randomly assigned into study and control groups. Patients in both groups were well matched regarding preoperative characteristics. Five minutes preoperatively 32 patients of the study and control groups received 15 mg/kg tranexamic acid or normal saline intravenously respectively. Our findings showed a significantly smaller decrease in 6- and 24-hour postoperative hemoglobin levels, less intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, and less need for allogenic blood transfusion in the tranexamic acid group. Our results also revealed a higher mean of 6- and 24-hour hematocrit level and shorter hospital stay in the tranexamic acid group compared to the control group, which were not statistically meaningful. In our study no thromboembolic event was seen; except 1 patient in the control group. Our study showed that administering tranexamic acid before the start of cementless THA under epidural anesthesia can reduce intraoperative and postoperative bleeding as well as need for blood transfusion.

Lessons learned in antifibrinolytic therapy: The BART trial

Despite nearly 2 decades of published reports and clinical trials demonstrating the relative safety and efficacy of aprotinin in adult cardiac surgical patients at increased risk of bleeding-culminating in an official endorsement of the usage of aprotinin in such patients from both cardiac surgery and anesthesiology subspecialty committees-several more recent studies have raised profound concerns regarding the safety of aprotinin in these same patients. These studies and the implications thereof have ultimately resulted in the withdrawal of aprotinin from clinical usage internationally. This article will briefly review these developments with the hope of understanding how this abrupt turnabout took place and will attempt to understand how such events can be avoided in the future.

Can local application of Tranexamic acid reduce post-coronary bypass surgery blood loss? A randomized controlled trial

Background

Diffuse microvascular bleeding remains a common problem after cardiac procedures.

Systemic use of antifibrinolytic reduces the postoperative blood loss.

The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of local application of tranexamic acid to reduce blood loss after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Methods

Thirty eight patients scheduled for primary isolated coronary artery bypass grafting were included in this double blind, prospective, randomized, placebo controlled study.

Tranexamic acid (TA) group (19 patients) received 1 gram of TA diluted in 100 ml normal saline. Placebo group (19 patients) received 100 ml of normal saline only. The solution was purred in the pericardial and mediastinal cavities.

Results

Both groups were comparable in their baseline demographic and surgical characteristics. During the first 24 hours post-operatively, cumulative blood loss was significantly less in TA group (median of 626 ml) compared to Placebo group (median of 1040 ml) (P = 0.04). There was no significant difference in the post-op Packed RBCs transfusion between both groups (median of one unit in each) (P = 0.82). Significant less platelets transfusion required in TA group (median zero unit) than in placebo group (median 2 units) (P = 0.03). Apart from re-exploration for excessive surgical bleeding in one patient in TA group, no difference was found in morbidity or mortality between both groups.

Conclusion

Topical application of tranexamic acid in patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting led to a significant reduction in postoperative blood loss without adding extra risk to the patient.

The aprotinin saga and the risks of conducting meta-analyses on small randomised controlled trials - a critique of a Cochrane review

Background

Aprotinin for reducing blood loss during coronary artery bypass surgery was withdrawn from the market after early termination of a large randomised controlled trial (RCT) showing excess mortality for patients receiving aprotinin compared to lysine analogues. Several meta-analyses of small RCTs did not show excess mortality and even indicated reduced mortality, while several observational studies showed excess mortality. The aim of this paper is to review the quality of the meta-analysis of a Cochrane report.

Methods

The 52 studies included in the meta-analysis of the Cochrane report were reviewed according to whether an objective to study mortality was formulated in advance, whether follow-up method or time were specified, and whether the study had statistical power to show any effect.

Results

The Cochrane report restricted the analysis to RCTs, but the largest study should not have been included given that it was a prospective observational study with 1 784 patients rather than an RCT. None of the RCTs had sufficient statistical power to detect differences in mortality. Most studies had fewer than 100 patients. Seven out of 51 RCTs had mortality outcome as one of their objectives. Only very few described follow-up method or time.

Conclusion

It is doubtful whether small studies should be included in meta-analyses if they do not have the purpose of studying the specified outcome and if the follow-up method or time are not adequately described. The aprotinin saga shows overconfidence in small RCTs of inferior quality compared to well-conducted observational studies.

Platelet-rich-plasmapheresis for minimising peri-operative allogeneic blood transfusion

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood have generated considerable enthusiasm for the use of technologies intended to reduce the use of allogeneic blood (blood from an unrelated donor). Platelet-rich plasmapheresis (PRP) offers an alternative approach to blood conservation.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the evidence for the efficacy of PRP in reducing peri-operative allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, and the evidence for any effect on clinical outcomes such as mortality and re-operation rates.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Studies were identified by: computer searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Current Contents, and the Cochrane Library (to June 2001). These searches were supplemented by checking the reference lists of published articles, reports, and reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Controlled parallel group trials in which adult patients, scheduled for non-urgent surgery, were randomised to PRP, or to a control group who did not receive the intervention.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Main outcomes measured were: the number of patients receiving an allogeneic RBC transfusion, and the amount of RBC transfused. Trial quality was assessed using criteria proposed by Schulz et al. (Schulz 1995) and Jadad et al. (Jadad 1996).

MAIN RESULTS

Nineteen trials of PRP were identified that reported data for the number of patients exposed to allogeneic RBC transfusion. These trials evaluated a total of 1452 patients. The pooled relative risk (RR) of exposure to allogeneic blood transfusion in those patients randomised to PRP was 0.71 (95%CI: 0.56, 0.90), equating to a relative risk reduction (RRR) of 29%; the average absolute risk reduction (ARR) was 19% (RD = -0.19: 95%CI: -0.29, -0.09). On average, PRP did not significantly reduce the total volume of RBC transfused (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -0.69: 95%CI: -1.93, 0.56 units). Substantial statistical heterogeneity was observed (p < 0.001). Trials provided inadequate data regarding the impact of PRP on morbidity, mortality, and hospital length of stay. The majority of trials were small and of poor methodological quality.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Although the results suggest that PRP is effective in reducing allogeneic RBC transfusion in adult patients undergoing elective surgery, there was considerable heterogeneity in treatment effects and the trials were of poor methodological quality. As the majority of trials were unblinded, transfusion practices may have been influenced by knowledge of the patient's allocation status, potentially exaggerating the true magnitude of the beneficial effect of PRP. The available studies provided inadequate data for firm conclusions to be drawn regarding the impact of PRP on clinically important endpoints.