101
|
Leal Rato M, Duarte GS, Ferreira AN, Alves M, Mainoli B, Teodoro T, Mestre TA, Costa J, Ferreira JJ. Nocebo response in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2019; 65:13-19. [DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2018] [Revised: 02/23/2019] [Accepted: 04/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
102
|
Mills L, Boakes RA, Colagiuri B. The effect of dose expectancies on caffeine withdrawal symptoms during tapered dose reduction. J Psychopharmacol 2019; 33:994-1002. [PMID: 30526233 DOI: 10.1177/0269881118817158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Negative expectancies can exacerbate withdrawal symptoms via the nocebo effect. As such, information provided about dose reductions during attempts to taper a drug could contribute to withdrawal symptoms and increase the likelihood of relapse. The current study tested whether blinding participants to dose reductions during a supervised caffeine dose taper reduced these nocebo-induced withdrawal symptoms. METHODS Three groups of moderate to heavy coffee drinkers had their dose of caffeine reduced (tapered) from 300 mg per day to 0 mg over the course of five days and reported withdrawal symptoms twice daily. Groups were given differing information about how much caffeine they were receiving. An Open Reduction group was given accurate information about dose reductions. A Blind Reduction group was given no dose information whatsoever. A Deceptive Reduction group was misinformed about dose, with instructions suggesting that the dose remained on 300 mg for three days then dropped to 0 mg. RESULTS The Open Reduction group reported more pronounced caffeine withdrawal symptoms than the Deceptive Reduction group on the days with the greatest discrepancy between actual dose and informed dose, indicating a nocebo effect of open versus deceptive reductions. In addition, the rate of increase in reported withdrawal symptoms in the Blind Reduction and Deceptive Reduction groups was less than that of the Open Reduction group. CONCLUSION These results suggest that awareness of dose reductions during a dose taper can result in a nocebo withdrawal effect, and that removing this awareness can reduce withdrawal. This has important implications for standard supervised dose-tapering practice, where patients are aware of the timing and magnitude of dose reductions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Llewellyn Mills
- 1 School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,2 Discipline of Addiction Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Robert A Boakes
- 1 School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ben Colagiuri
- 1 School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
103
|
Gaab J, Bürgin D, Locher C, Werner C, Urech S, Bratschi C, Garcia LB, Hauke M, Bitter S, Bohny M, Bentz D. Endogenous cortisol and conditioned placebo effects on pain - A randomized trial. J Psychosom Res 2019; 123:109739. [PMID: 31376878 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.109739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Revised: 06/07/2019] [Accepted: 06/12/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Placebo effects can be induced by learning and conditioning processes, which in turn are influenced and modulated by glucocorticoids. Accordingly, previous research has shown that intervention-related associative learning can be modulated through exogenous as well as endogenous glucocorticoids. Thus, the aim of this study was to elucidate whether placebo effects induced by conditioning is modulated by daily fluctuations of endogenous cortisol levels in healthy male and female subjects. Overall 77 participants underwent a two-phased placebo conditioning paradigm for pain analgesia. Subjects were randomized in two groups, which underwent placebo preconditioning either in the morning (08:00-10:00, i.e. with high endogenous cortisol levels) or in the afternoon (16:00-18:00, i.e. with low endogenous cortisol levels). Placebo effects were assessed two days later at noontime (12:00-13:00), with possible differences between groups as an indicator of glucocorticoid modulation on the placebo learning. Results indicated a significant conditioned placebo-induced analgesia, resulting in a placebo effect of small to medium size. Cortisol levels on conditioning day significantly differed between groups and cortisol levels were similar during assessment of placebo effects. Groups did not differ in their mean reduction in pain sensation, thus the placebo effect was not affected by differences in cortisol levels during the conditioning of placebo effects. The present study does not indicate a moderation of placebo conditioning by endogenous glucocorticoid levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Gaab
- Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Psychology, University of Basel, Switzerland.
| | - David Bürgin
- Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Psychology, University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - Cosima Locher
- Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Psychology, University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Werner
- Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Psychology, University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stefanie Urech
- Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Psychology, University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christine Bratschi
- Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Psychology, University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - Lorena Bartolomé Garcia
- Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Psychology, University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - Milena Hauke
- Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Psychology, University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - Salome Bitter
- Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Psychology, University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - Marc Bohny
- Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Psychology, University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - Dorothée Bentz
- Division of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, University of Basel, Switzerland; Psychiatric University Clinics, University of Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
104
|
Corsi N, Emadi Andani M, Sometti D, Tinazzi M, Fiorio M. When words hurt: Verbal suggestion prevails over conditioning in inducing the motor nocebo effect. Eur J Neurosci 2019; 50:3311-3326. [PMID: 31209960 DOI: 10.1111/ejn.14489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2018] [Revised: 05/07/2019] [Accepted: 05/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Perception and behavior are strongly influenced by the verbal information conveyed by other individuals (e.g., verbal suggestion) and by learning (e.g., conditioning). This influence is well represented by the placebo and nocebo effects, in which positive verbal suggestion associated with positive conditioning induces beneficial outcomes (placebo effect), while the opposite is true for the negative counterpart (nocebo effect). It is still unclear whether verbal suggestion and conditioning exert distinctive roles in influencing perception, behavior and motor system activity when they occur in opposite directions. To this purpose, fifty-three healthy volunteers were assigned to four groups characterized by either congruent or incongruent verbal suggestion and conditioning. Participants were asked to perform a force motor task by pressing a piston as strongly as possible. Transcranial magnetic stimulation over the primary motor cortex was used to record motor evoked potentials (MEP) and cortical silent period (CSP) from the muscle involved in the task. We found that negative verbal suggestion counteracted positive conditioning and induced sense of weakness, effort, and force decrements. MEP amplitude was stable, whereas the CSP duration shortened in all the groups throughout the procedure, indicating the involvement of cortical inhibitory circuits, independently of the type of verbal suggestion or conditioning. Our findings highlight a prevalent role of verbal suggestion over conditioning in determining a worsening (nocebo effect) but not an improvement (placebo effect) of motor performance. These results suggest that words associated with treatments should be chosen carefully to avoid negative outcomes, especially in sports and clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Corsi
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.,Pain and Palliative Care Unit, Oncology Department, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Mehran Emadi Andani
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Davide Sometti
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Michele Tinazzi
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Mirta Fiorio
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
105
|
Wolters F, Peerdeman KJ, Evers AW. Placebo and Nocebo Effects Across Symptoms: From Pain to Fatigue, Dyspnea, Nausea, and Itch. Front Psychiatry 2019; 10:470. [PMID: 31312148 PMCID: PMC6614509 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Accepted: 06/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Placebo and nocebo effects are, respectively, the helpful and harmful treatment effects that do not arise from active treatment components. These effects have thus far been researched most often in pain. It is not yet clear to what extent these findings from pain can be generalized to other somatic symptoms. This review investigates placebo and nocebo effects in four other highly prevalent symptoms: dyspnea, fatigue, nausea, and itch. The role of learning mechanisms (verbal suggestions, conditioning) in placebo and nocebo effects on various outcomes (self-reported, behavioral, and physiological) of these different somatic symptoms is explored. A search of experimental studies indicated that, as in pain, the combination of verbal suggestion and conditioning is generally more effective than suggestion alone for evoking placebo and nocebo effects. However, conditioning appears more and verbal suggestions less relevant in symptoms other than pain, with the exception of placebo effects on fatigue and nocebo effects on itch. Physiological measures, such as heart rate, lung function, or gastric activity, are rarely affected even when self-reported symptoms are. Neurobiological correlates are rarely investigated, and few commonalities appear across symptoms. Expectations generally predict placebo and nocebo effects for dyspnea and itch but seem less involved in fatigue and nausea. Individual characteristics do not consistently predict placebo or nocebo effects across symptoms or studies. In sum, many conclusions deriving from placebo and nocebo pain studies do appear to apply to other somatic symptoms, but a number of important differences exist. Understanding what type of learning mechanisms for which symptom are most likely to trigger placebo and nocebo effects is crucial for generalizing knowledge for research and therapies across symptoms and can help clinicians to optimize placebo effects in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Wolters
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
- Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Kaya J. Peerdeman
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
- Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Andrea W.M. Evers
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
- Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
106
|
Babel P, Adamczyk W, Swider K, Bajcar EA, Kicman P, Lisinska N. How Classical Conditioning Shapes Placebo Analgesia: Hidden versus Open Conditioning. PAIN MEDICINE 2019; 19:1156-1169. [PMID: 29016984 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnx177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Objective To investigate the influence of expectancy of pain intensity, fear of pain (trait), and fear (state) on the effectiveness of hidden and open conditioning to produce placebo analgesia. Methods A total of 90 healthy female volunteers were randomly assigned to three groups (hidden conditioning, open conditioning, and control) that received electrical stimuli preceded by either orange or blue lights. One color was paired with painful stimuli (control stimuli) and the other color was paired with nonpainful stimuli (conditioned stimuli) in both the hidden and open conditioning groups. Only participants in the open conditioning group were informed about this association. In the control group, both color lights were followed by control stimuli. In the testing phase, both colored lights were followed by identical control stimuli. Participants rated pain intensity, expectancy of pain intensity, fear, and fear of pain. Results A significant analgesic effect was found only in the hidden conditioning group, where no explicit verbal suggestions were provided. Hidden conditioning had an effect on expectancy and fear-participants in the hidden conditioning group expected less pain and experienced less fear in relation to conditioned stimuli. Fear was the only predictor of placebo analgesia in the hidden conditioning group. Neither expectancy of pain intensity nor fear of pain predicted placebo analgesia. Conclusions Fear seems to be a more important factor than expectancy in producing placebo analgesia induced by hidden conditioning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Przemyslaw Babel
- Jagiellonian University, Institute of Psychology, Pain Research Group, Kraków, Poland
| | - Waclaw Adamczyk
- Jagiellonian University, Institute of Psychology, Pain Research Group, Kraków, Poland.,The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education, Department of Kinesiotherapy and Special Methods in Physiotherapy, Katowice, Poland
| | - Karolina Swider
- Jagiellonian University, Institute of Psychology, Pain Research Group, Kraków, Poland.,Radboud University Nijmegen, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition & Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Elzbieta A Bajcar
- Jagiellonian University, Institute of Psychology, Pain Research Group, Kraków, Poland
| | - Pawel Kicman
- Jagiellonian University, Institute of Psychology, Pain Research Group, Kraków, Poland
| | - Natalia Lisinska
- Jagiellonian University, Institute of Psychology, Pain Research Group, Kraków, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
107
|
Belcher AM, Cole TO, Greenblatt AD, Hoag SW, Epstein DH, Wagner M, Billing AS, Massey E, Hamilton KR, Kozak ZK, Welsh CJ, Weintraub E, Wickwire EM, Wish ED, Kaptchuk TJ, Colloca L. Open-label dose-extending placebos for opioid use disorder: a protocol for a randomised controlled clinical trial with methadone treatment. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e026604. [PMID: 31230007 PMCID: PMC6596949 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2018] [Revised: 04/08/2019] [Accepted: 05/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION More than 2 million individuals in the USA have an opioid use disorder (OUD). Methadone maintenance treatment is the gold standard of medication-based treatment for OUD, but high-dose methadone is associated with cardiotoxicity and respiratory complications, among other side effects. These adverse effects make enhancing the effectiveness of lower doses of methadone an attractive therapeutic goal. Long recognised for its capacity to enhance treatment outcomes for a wide range of neuropsychiatric disorders including pain, the placebo effect offers an as-yet untested avenue to such an enhancement. This approach is particularly compelling given that individuals with substance use disorder tend to have higher salience attribution and may thereby be more sensitive to placebo effects. Our study combines two promising clinical methodologies-conditioning/dose-extension and open-label placebo-to investigate whether placebo effects can increase the effective potency of methadone in treatment-seeking OUD patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A total of 120 newly enrolled treatment-seeking OUD patients will be randomly assigned to one of two different groups: either methadone plus daily placebo dose-extension (PDE; treatment group) or methadone/treatment as usual (control). Participants will meet with study team members five times over the course of 3 months of treatment with methadone (baseline, 2 weeks, and 1, 2 and 3 months postbaseline). Throughout this study time period, methadone dosages will be adjusted by an addiction clinician blind to patient assignment, per standard clinical methods. The primary outcome is methadone dose at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include self-report of drug use; 3-month urine toxicology screen results; and treatment retention. Exploratory outcomes include several environmental as well as personality factors associated with OUD and with propensity to demonstrate a placebo effect. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Human subjects oversight for this study is provided by the University of Maryland, Baltimore and University of Maryland, College Park Institutional Review Boards. Additionally, the study protocol is reviewed annually by an independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board. Study results will be disseminated via research conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02941809.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annabelle M Belcher
- Department of Psychiatry, Division of Addiction Research and Treatment, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Thomas O Cole
- Department of Psychiatry, Division of Addiction Research and Treatment, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Aaron D Greenblatt
- Department of Psychiatry, Division of Addiction Research and Treatment, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Stephen W Hoag
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - David H Epstein
- Real-world Assessment, Prediction and Treatment Unit, National Institute on Drug Abuse Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Michael Wagner
- University of Maryland Center for Substance Abuse Research, College Park, Maryland, USA
| | - Amy S Billing
- University of Maryland Center for Substance Abuse Research, College Park, Maryland, USA
| | - Ebonie Massey
- University of Maryland Center for Substance Abuse Research, College Park, Maryland, USA
| | - Kristen R Hamilton
- Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
| | - Zofia K Kozak
- Medical School Training Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Christopher J Welsh
- Department of Psychiatry, Division of Addiction Research and Treatment, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Eric Weintraub
- Department of Psychiatry, Division of Addiction Research and Treatment, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Emerson M Wickwire
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Sleep Disorders Center, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Eric D Wish
- University of Maryland Center for Substance Abuse Research, College Park, Maryland, USA
| | - Ted J Kaptchuk
- Program in Placebo Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Luana Colloca
- Department of Pain and Translational Symptom Science, University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
108
|
Abstract
The role of psychological mechanisms in the treatment process cannot be underestimated, the well-known placebo effect unquestionably being a factor in treatment. However, there is also a dark side to the impact of mental processes on health/illness as exemplified by the nocebo effect. This phenomenon includes the emergence or exacerbation of negative symptoms associated with the therapy, but arising as a result of the patient's expectations, rather than being an actual complication of treatment. The exact biological mechanisms of this process are not known, but cholecystokinergic and dopaminergic systems, changes in the HPA axis, and the endogenous secretion of opioids are thought to be involved. The nocebo effect can affect a significant proportion of people undergoing treatment, including cancer patients, leading in some cases to the cessation of potentially effective therapy, because of adverse effects that are not actually part of the biological effect of treatment. In extreme cases, as a result of suggestions and expectations, a paradoxical effect, biologically opposite to the mechanism of the action of the drug, may occur. In addition, the nocebo effect may significantly interfere with the results of clinical trials, being the cause of a significant proportion of complications reported. Knowledge of the phenomenon is thus necessary in order to facilitate its minimalization and thus improve the quality of life of patients and the effectiveness of treatment.
Collapse
|
109
|
Using Different Expectation Mechanisms to Optimize Treatment of Patients With Medical Conditions: A Systematic Review. Psychosom Med 2019; 80:535-543. [PMID: 29697530 DOI: 10.1097/psy.0000000000000596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients' expectations have been shown to predict the course and treatment success of a variety of medical conditions. Therefore, expectation-focused psychological interventions (EFPIs) have been developed to use these expectation effects clinically. Importantly, EFPI differ with regard to the particular expectation mechanism being addressed, i.e., expectation optimization or expectation violation. The aims of this systematic review were to give an overview of the application of these expectation interventions and to evaluate their effectiveness. METHODS Several databases were searched to identify clinical trials or experimental studies that conducted EFPI among participants with various medical conditions. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. RESULTS Eleven studies (N = 944) investigating different medical conditions (coronary heart disease, cancer, chronic pain) were included. Qualitative synthesis revealed positive effects of EFPI on clinical outcome variables in all studies. Expectation optimization approaches yielded particularly promising results. Because of the large heterogeneity of outcome measures, quantitative synthesis was not possible. CONCLUSION This review highlights the potential of EFPI for optimizing treatment of patients with medical conditions. However, it seems that different expectation mechanisms might have different application possibilities. Therefore, we provide suggestions for further developing EFPI to tailor treatment and develop personalized psychological interventions. We argue that for this purpose, it is important to consider both disease-specific aspects and patients' personality traits. In addition, we discuss future challenges such as implementing EFPI into routine medical care.
Collapse
|
110
|
Magnitude, response, and psychological determinants of placebo effects in chronic low-back pain: a randomised, double-blinded, controlled trial. Pain Rep 2019; 4:e744. [PMID: 31583358 PMCID: PMC6749916 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000000744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2018] [Revised: 02/17/2019] [Accepted: 03/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Denervation of the lumbar zygapophyseal joints by medial branch radiofrequency neurotomy has shown some benefit in treating chronic low-back pain. Before denervation, a diagnosis is made by one or more blinded injections on separate occasions to ascertain whether the relevant joints are contributing to the pain. Placebo injections have been advocated in a diagnostic regime that also includes local anaesthesia, with a decision to proceed to neurotomy based on response to local anaesthesia and not to placebo. Objectives: We investigated the magnitude of and response rate to placebo injections, and the roles of expectation, desire for pain relief, and anxiety as determinants of response to placebo. Methods: One hundred twenty patients were randomised to receive placebo and local anaesthetic injections on alternate occasions in a double-blind manner. A smaller control group with 2 local anaesthetic injections was also used. Responses to placebo were characterised, including magnitude and frequency. Results: This study demonstrated very large response to placebo injections, both response rate (78%) and magnitude (effect size d = 1.85). Expectation and anxiety were important modulators of response to placebo in this setting, with support given to expectation as a dynamic modulator of placebo responses. Large response to placebo (both in rate and magnitude) was observed when participants reported the belief that they were in the placebo arm. Conclusion: This study demonstrated large placebo responses in the context of injections for low-back pain and further characterised the importance of expectation and anxiety as important psychological mediators.
Collapse
|
111
|
How to prevent, minimize, or extinguish nocebo effects in pain: a narrative review on mechanisms, predictors, and interventions. Pain Rep 2019; 4:e699. [PMID: 31583340 PMCID: PMC6749907 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000000699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2018] [Revised: 08/30/2018] [Accepted: 09/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Possible factors that contribute to nocebo effects on pain are explored. Strategies that can prevent, minimize, or extinguish nocebo effects in clinical settings are suggested. Nocebo effects, such as side effects due to negative expectations regarding the pain treatment, are a concern for health care providers and come with significant costs. This narrative review focuses on underlying mechanisms and possible factors that contribute to the susceptibility to the nocebo effect on pain and related outcomes and suggests strategies that can prevent, minimize, or extinguish nocebo effects in clinical settings. Nocebo effects are the result of psychological (eg, conditioning, verbal suggestions, and observational learning) and neurobiological (eg, cholecystokinin and dopamine regulation) mechanisms. Evidence from clinical and experimental studies lead to various recommendations and strategies to alter the nocebo effect in order to optimize pain treatments, such as providing patients with enhanced information, optimizing patient–physician communication and relationships, and offering psychoeducation on coping skills in order to manage patient expectations. The current literature from both clinical and experimental studies provides a better understanding of the nocebo effect and possible factors that modulate its strength on treatment outcomes. This allows for the development of evidence-based strategies aimed at the prevention, minimization, and treatment of the nocebo effect in pain conditions and possible other somatic disorders.
Collapse
|
112
|
Gruszka P, Burger C, Jensen MP. Optimizing Expectations via Mobile Apps: A New Approach for Examining and Enhancing Placebo Effects. Front Psychiatry 2019; 10:365. [PMID: 31214057 PMCID: PMC6554680 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
There is growing interest in interventions that enhance placebo responses in clinical practice, given the possibility that this would lead to better patient health and more effective therapy outcomes. Previous studies suggest that placebo effects can be maximized by optimizing patients' outcome expectations. However, expectancy interventions are difficult to validate because of methodological challenges, such as reliable blinding of the clinician providing the intervention. Here we propose a novel approach using mobile apps that can provide highly standardized expectancy interventions in a blinded manner, while at the same time assessing data in everyday life using experience sampling methodology (e.g., symptom severity, expectations) and data from smartphone sensors. Methodological advantages include: 1) full standardization; 2) reliable blinding and randomization; 3) disentangling expectation effects from other factors associated with face-to-face interventions; 4) assessing short-term (days), long-term (months), and cumulative effects of expectancy interventions; and 5) investigating possible mechanisms of change. Randomization and expectancy interventions can be realized by the app (e.g., after the clinic/lab visit). As a result, studies can be blinded without the possibility for the clinician to influence study outcomes. Possible app-based expectancy interventions include, for example, verbal suggestions and imagery exercises, although a large number of possible interventions (e.g., hypnosis) could be evaluated using this innovative approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Gruszka
- Mental Health Research and Treatment Center, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Christoph Burger
- Department of Basic Psychological Research and Research Methods, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Applied Psychology: Work, Education and Economy, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mark P. Jensen
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
113
|
Devlin EJ, Whitford HS, Denson LA. The impact of valence framing on response expectancies of side effects and subsequent experiences: a randomised controlled trial. Psychol Health 2019; 34:1358-1377. [PMID: 31132015 DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2019.1609677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Objective: Pre-treatment side effect expectancies often influence subsequent experiences; however, expectancy-based reduction strategies are lacking. We explored whether framing information about adverse responses (in positive or negative formats) altered expectancies and experiences of a cold pressor task. We further investigated associations between expectancies and experiences, to inform potential interventions. Design: Healthy volunteers (N = 134), randomised to receive positively- or negatively-framed pre-cold pressor task information, self-rated 12 expectancies for cold pressor experiences, emotional state and coping style. Main Outcome Measures: Self-reports of the same 12-experiences (recorded during and after the experiment) were assessed. Results: Framing had minimal impact on expectancies and experiences; however, discomfort threshold (p = .08, d = 0.22) showed a trend in the expected direction. Hierarchical regressions revealed expectancies uniquely, significantly predicted 6-23% of the variance for 11 subsequent experiences. Following a popular charity event (Ice Bucket Challenge), all participants showed higher 'discomfort thresholds' (p = .001, d = 0.59), and those in the negative frame reported more overall 'discomfort' (p = .01, d = 0.60) than participants in the positive condition. Conclusion: Expectancies uniquely influenced subsequent cold pressor experiences. Framing had minimal impact in this 'analogue' medical setting, only influencing 'discomfort threshold'. 'Discomfort threshold' and overall 'discomfort' were also impacted by a social media challenge, highlighting a potential area for intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise J Devlin
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide , Adelaide , SA , Australia
| | - Hayley S Whitford
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide , Adelaide , SA , Australia.,University of South Australia Cancer Research Institute , Adelaide , SA , Australia
| | - Linley A Denson
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide , Adelaide , SA , Australia
| |
Collapse
|
114
|
Placebo analgesia effects across central nervous system diseases: what do we know and where do we need to go? Pain Rep 2019; 4:e717. [PMID: 31583343 PMCID: PMC6749922 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000000717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2018] [Revised: 11/01/2018] [Accepted: 01/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Placebo effects are well established in healthy participants experiencing experimental or acute pain. Yet, little is known about the mechanisms of placebo analgesia effects in patients with chronic pain and even less is known in patients suffering from central nervous system (CNS) diseases where pain is prevalent, difficult to manage, and often undertreated. This article briefly reviews the current knowledge of placebo analgesia effects in healthy participants with the aim of discussing how the mechanisms in placebo analgesia differ between healthy participants and patients. The focus will be on placebo analgesia effects in chronic pain conditions as well as in 2 CNS diseases: Alzheimer disease and Parkinson disease. Finally, strengths and weaknesses of the current knowledge will be discussed and it will be demonstrated how insights from the placebo literature may point to new ways of improving treatments among patients experiencing pain in relation to CNS diseases.
Collapse
|
115
|
How instructions shape aversive learning: higher order knowledge, reversal learning, and the role of the amygdala. Curr Opin Behav Sci 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
116
|
Zech N, Seemann M, Grzesiek M, Breu A, Seyfried TF, Hansen E. Nocebo Effects on Muscular Performance - An Experimental Study About Clinical Situations. Front Pharmacol 2019; 10:219. [PMID: 30914952 PMCID: PMC6421283 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2018] [Accepted: 02/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Nocebo effects are not only seen in studies of pharmacology and placebo/nocebo research but also in clinical everyday situations. For generation of objective and quantitative data on the impact of negative communication we have evaluated the immediate effects of common sentences, non-verbal signals and situations in the medical context on muscular performance. Methods: In an experimental study, 46 volunteers were tested by dynamometry of the deltoid muscle group to evaluate the maximal muscular strength during arm abduction. Baseline values were compared to performance after exposure to 18 verbal and non-verbal suggestions. Suggestions suspected to be negative were alternated with and compared to positively formulated alternatives. Results: Verbal and non-verbal communication produced significant effects on muscular performance, resulting mainly in weakening. The decrease in muscle strength after risk information for informed consent (91.4% of baseline) was absent, when benefits of the treatment were named coincidently. The weakening effect of asking about "pain" and "nausea" (89.4%), and of the announcement of medical interventions (91.7%) could be avoided with alternative wording. Impairment of muscular performance was also observed with the nocebo-inducers negative memory (89.5%) or uncertain future (93.3%), in contrast to a positive memory or the orientation into the presence. Non-verbal suggestions like overhead anesthesia induction (89.9%), a transport in strict flat supine position (89.1%), or a view from the window to a parking lot (94.1%) significantly reduced maximal muscle strength, whereas face-to face induction, half-sitting position and a view into the landscape did not. 8 out of 9 tested clinical situations reduced maximal arm muscle strength significantly, whereas alternative formulations did not. Conclusion: This study describes a quick, simple and uniform test using objective measurement of maximal muscle strength to allow for identification, quantification, and comparison of negative suggestions, regardless of their specific content and effect. Muscle strength is a clinically relevant parameter with regard to early mobilization, risk of falling and sufficient breathing. Furthermore, the observed impairment of muscular performance could reflect a general "weakening effect" of negative suggestions. In addition, the test facilitates development and verification of appropriate alternatives to prevent nocebo effects in patients, thereby improving patient communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Zech
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Milena Seemann
- Department of Anesthesiology, Klinikum Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Magdalena Grzesiek
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Anita Breu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Sana Clinics Cham, Cham, Germany
| | - Timo F Seyfried
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Ernil Hansen
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
117
|
Decreasing the Burden of Side Effects Through Positive Message Framing: an Experimental Proof-of-Concept Study. Int J Behav Med 2019; 25:381-389. [PMID: 29785686 DOI: 10.1007/s12529-018-9726-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Informing patients about treatment side effects increases the occurrence and intensity of side effects. Since the obligatory informed consent procedure in drug treatments requires transparency and nocebo research suggests that the informed consent of a drug leads to an increased occurrence of the mentioned side effects, the aim of this proof of concept study was to determine the effect of two different framings of informed consent on the occurrence, intensity, and perceived threat of side effects. METHODS Healthy male participants (n = 80) were randomized to one of two framing groups. The positive framing group was informed that the common side effect dizziness was a sign that the drug had started to work, while the neutral framing group was told that dizziness is an unpleasant but well-known side effect. Side effects were measured after the administration of metoprolol, an antihypertensive agent. Post hoc moderator analyses investigated the effect of pre-existing negative beliefs about the general harm of medication on the framing manipulation. RESULTS Metoprolol-specific drug-attributed side effects were rated significantly less threatening in the positive framing group. The between-group effect size (Cohen's d) was small (d = 0.38, p = 0.049). Exploratory post hoc moderator analyses suggest that participants who believed that medication is a source of harmful effects benefited from positive framing, compared to neutral framing of drug-attributed side effects. CONCLUSIONS Positive framing was partially effective in decreasing specific side effect measures, particularly among participants with a tendency to believe that medicine is harmful. Informed consent procedures should therefore be personalized, focusing on patients with negative treatment beliefs.
Collapse
|
118
|
Tekampe J, van Middendorp H, Sweep FCGJ, Roerink SHPP, Hermus ARMM, Evers AWM. Conditioning cortisol in humans: design and pilot study of a randomized controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2019; 5:9. [PMID: 30680223 PMCID: PMC6337859 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-018-0382-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2018] [Accepted: 12/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Conditioning of physiological responses can be achieved by repeatedly pairing a previously neutral conditioned stimulus with the administration of a pharmacologically salient unconditioned stimulus. This type of conditioning has been effective for specific immune and endocrine responses, but results with regard to conditioning of cortisol, a key stress-regulatory parameter, are currently unclear. This paper describes a pharmacological conditioning design, optimized for the examination of effects of cortisol conditioning under both basal conditions and in response to stress. Methods A double-blind randomized controlled conditioning paradigm aimed at conditioning of cortisol is conducted in 48 healthy female volunteers. During the acquisition phase, a gustatory stimulus (conditioned stimulus) is paired with hydrocortisone (100 mg, capsulated, unconditioned stimulus) three times before being administered together with placebo during three evocation sessions. To investigate possible effects of cortisol conditioning in response to stress, participants are exposed to the Trier Social Stress Test during the third evocation session. Primary outcome measure of this study is the mean area under the curve of salivary cortisol during the first two evocation sessions. As secondary outcomes, self-reported affect and stress as well as alpha-amylase are investigated. A pilot study was conducted to ensure that this design is feasible to be used in a larger study. Discussion This study design provides an innovative opportunity to examine the conditioning of cortisol under basal conditions and in response to stress. Also, the possible effect of cortisol conditioning on secondary outcomes of self-reported affect and alpha-amylase can be investigated. If cortisol could successfully be conditioned, this would be of conceptual relevance, showing that hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis regulation can be influenced by associative learning processes. Eventually, this could also have important clinical implications for understanding and treating stress-related disorders in which HPA axis dysregulation might play a role. Trial registration Nederlands Trial Register, NTR4651. Registered on 29 July 2014 Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s40814-018-0382-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Tekampe
- 1Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9555, 2300 RB, Leiden, The Netherlands.,2Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - H van Middendorp
- 1Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9555, 2300 RB, Leiden, The Netherlands.,2Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - F C G J Sweep
- 3Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - S H P P Roerink
- 4Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - A R M M Hermus
- 4Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - A W M Evers
- 1Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9555, 2300 RB, Leiden, The Netherlands.,2Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,5Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
119
|
Netter P. Benefits and limitations of drug studies in temperament research: biochemical responses as indicators of temperament. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2019; 373:rstb.2017.0165. [PMID: 29483349 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper presents a discussion of principles and problems of neurotransmitter challenge tests using examples of experiments, most of which were performed in the author's laboratory. Drugs targeting synthesis, release, receptors or reuptake of dopamine, serotonin and noradrenergic transmitter (TM) systems were used for characterizing or discriminating certain temperament or personality traits and their sub-factors. Any personality or temperament trait is characterized by multiple TM responses, thus constellations of hormone responses to drugs acting on different TM systems or on different sources of TM activity were investigated within individuals in crossover designs. The major conclusions are: (i) intra-individual patterns of hormone responses to different TM-related drugs, or to agonists and antagonists, can help to discriminate subtypes of temperament dimensions, and (ii) the latency and shape of response curves may help specify processes of biological responses related to psychological dimensions and reveal common TM sensitivities in clusters of traits. TM sensitivity, defined by hormone responses, does not always correspond to accompanying behavioural indicators, but may provide more specific information on underlying mechanisms. Additional consideration of drug doses and experimental induction of stressors may serve to identify temperament-related susceptibilities to certain drugs. Limitations of the challenge approach and recommendations for future research are discussed.This article is part of the theme issue 'Diverse perspectives on diversity: multi-disciplinary approaches to taxonomies of individual differences'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Netter
- Department of Psychology, University of Giessen, Otto Behaghel Strasse 10F, 35394 Giessen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
120
|
Petrie KJ, Rief W. Psychobiological Mechanisms of Placebo and Nocebo Effects: Pathways to Improve Treatments and Reduce Side Effects. Annu Rev Psychol 2019; 70:599-625. [PMID: 30110575 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 148] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Placebo effects constitute a major part of treatment success in medical interventions. The nocebo effect also has a major impact, as it accounts for a significant proportion of the reported side effects for many treatments. Historically, clinical trials have aimed to reduce placebo effects; however, currently, there is interest in optimizing placebo effects to improve existing treatments and in examining ways to minimize nocebo effects to improve clinical outcome. To achieve these aims, a better understanding of the psychological and neurobiological mechanisms of the placebo and nocebo response is required. This review discusses the impact of the placebo and nocebo response in health care. We also examine the mechanisms involved in the placebo and nocebo effects, including the central mechanism of expectations. Finally, we examine ways to enhance placebo effects and reduce the impact of the nocebo response in clinical practice and suggest areas for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith J Petrie
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand;
| | - Winfried Rief
- Division of Clinical Psychology, University of Marburg, 35032 Marburg, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
121
|
Abstract
The term nocebo effect refers to the harmful outcomes that result from people’s negative beliefs, anticipations, or experiences related to the treatment rather than the pharmacological properties of the treatment. These outcomes may include a worsening of symptoms, a lack of expected improvement, or adverse events, and they may occur after the active treatment and the placebo that is supposed to imitate it. The nocebo effect is always unwanted and may distort estimates of treatment effectiveness and safety; moreover, it may cause discontinuation of therapy or withdrawal from a trial. The nocebo effect may be unintentionally evoked by the explanations given by healthcare professionals during a clinical consultation or consent procedures, or by information from other patients, the media, or the Internet. Moreover, it may be a consequence of previous bad experiences with the treatment, through learning and conditioning, and the conditioning may happen without patients’ conscious awareness. In trial settings, a study design, for example lack of blinding, may introduce bias from the nocebo effect. Unlike the placebo effect, which is usually taken into consideration while interpreting treatment outcomes and controlled for in clinical trials, the nocebo effect is under-recognised by clinical researchers and clinicians. This is worrying, because the nocebo phenomenon is common and may have potentially negative consequences for the results of clinical treatment and trials. It is therefore important that doctors and medical researchers consider any potential nocebo effect while assessing the treatment effect and try to minimise it through careful choice and phrasing of treatment-related information given to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karolina Wartolowska
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
122
|
Zhou L, Wei H, Zhang H, Li X, Bo C, Wan L, Lu X, Hu L. The Influence of Expectancy Level and Personal Characteristics on Placebo Effects: Psychological Underpinnings. Front Psychiatry 2019; 10:20. [PMID: 30804816 PMCID: PMC6370695 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2018] [Accepted: 01/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Placebo effects benefit a wide range of clinical practice, which can be profoundly influenced by expectancy level and personal characteristics. However, research on the issue of whether these factors independently or interdependently affect the placebo effects is still in its infancy. Here, we adopted a 3-day between-subject placebo analgesia paradigm (2-day conditioning and 1-day test) to investigate the influence of expectancy levels (i.e., No, Low, and High) and personal characteristics (i.e., gender, dispositional optimism, and anxiety state) on placebo effects in 120 healthy participants (60 females). Our results showed that the reduction of pain intensity in the test phase was influenced by the interaction between expectancy and gender, as mainly reflected by greater reductions of pain intensity in females at Low expectancy level than females at No/High expectancy levels, and greater reductions of pain intensity in males than in females at High expectancy level. Additionally, the reduction of pain unpleasantness was not only modulated by the interaction between expectancy and gender, but also by the interaction between expectancy and dispositional optimism, as well as the interaction between expectancy and anxiety state. Specifically, participants who were more optimistic in Low expectancy group, or those who were less anxious in High expectancy group showed greater reductions of pain unpleasantness. To sum up, we emphasized on regulating the expectancy level individually based on the assessment of personal characteristics to maximize placebo effects in clinical conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lili Zhou
- CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.,Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Hua Wei
- Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality, Ministry of Education, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China
| | - Huijuan Zhang
- CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.,Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoyun Li
- Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality, Ministry of Education, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China
| | - Cunju Bo
- Department of Pain Management, The State Key Clinical Specialty in Pain Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Li Wan
- Department of Pain Management, The State Key Clinical Specialty in Pain Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xuejing Lu
- CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.,Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Li Hu
- CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.,Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.,Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality, Ministry of Education, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.,Department of Pain Management, The State Key Clinical Specialty in Pain Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
123
|
Friesen P. Placebos as a Source of Agency: Evidence and Implications. Front Psychiatry 2019; 10:721. [PMID: 31708807 PMCID: PMC6824097 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2019] [Accepted: 09/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Bioethical discussions surrounding the use of placebos in clinical practice have long revolved around the moral permissibility of deceiving a patient if it is likely to benefit them. While these discussions have been insightful and productive, they reinforce the notion that placebo effects can only be induced through deception. This paper challenges this notion, looking beyond the paradigmatic clinical encounter involving deceptive placebos and towards many other routes that bring about placebo effects. After briefly describing the bioethical terrain surrounding the deceptive use of placebos in clinical practice, section 1 offers an examination of the various mechanisms known to contribute to placebo effects: classical conditioning, expectations, affective pathways, open-label placebo treatments, and additional factors that do not fall easily into a single category. The following section explores how each of these routes can be harnessed to bring about clinical benefits without the use of deception. This provides grounding for reconceiving of the placebo effect as a clinical tool that is not always in conflict with patient autonomy and can even be seen as a source of agency. In the final section, implications of the shift away from seeing placebos as necessarily deceptive are discussed. These include the necessity of looking beyond the clinical encounter and mainstream medicine as the primary sites of placebo responses, how important acknowledging the limits of placebo effects will be when we do so, as well as the difficulties of disentangling agency, responsibility, and blame within medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phoebe Friesen
- Biomedical Ethics Unit, Social Studies of Medicine, McGill University, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
124
|
Reicherts P, Pauli P, Mösler C, Wieser MJ. Placebo Manipulations Reverse Pain Potentiation by Unpleasant Affective Stimuli. Front Psychiatry 2019; 10:663. [PMID: 31607964 PMCID: PMC6771171 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/16/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
According to the motivational priming hypothesis, unpleasant stimuli activate the motivational defense system, which in turn promotes congruent affective states such as negative emotions and pain. The question arises to what degree this bottom-up impact of emotions on pain is susceptible to a manipulation of top-down-driven expectations. To this end, we investigated whether verbal instructions implying pain potentiation vs. reduction (placebo or nocebo expectations)-later on confirmed by corresponding experiences (placebo or nocebo conditioning)-might alter behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of pain modulation by unpleasant pictures. We compared two groups, which underwent three experimental phases: first, participants were either instructed that watching unpleasant affective pictures would increase pain (nocebo group) or that watching unpleasant pictures would decrease pain (placebo group) relative to neutral pictures. During the following placebo/nocebo-conditioning phase, pictures were presented together with electrical pain stimuli of different intensities, reinforcing the instructions. In the subsequent test phase, all pictures were presented again combined with identical pain stimuli. Electroencephalogram was recorded in order to analyze neurophysiological responses of pain (somatosensory evoked potential) and picture processing [visually evoked late positive potential (LPP)], in addition to pain ratings. In the test phase, ratings of pain stimuli administered while watching unpleasant relative to neutral pictures were significantly higher in the nocebo group, thus confirming the motivational priming effect for pain perception. In the placebo group, this effect was reversed such that unpleasant compared with neutral pictures led to significantly lower pain ratings. Similarly, somatosensory evoked potentials were decreased during unpleasant compared with neutral pictures, in the placebo group only. LPPs of the placebo group failed to discriminate between unpleasant and neutral pictures, while the LPPs of the nocebo group showed a clear differentiation. We conclude that the placebo manipulation already affected the processing of the emotional stimuli and, in consequence, the processing of the pain stimuli. In summary, the study revealed that the modulation of pain by emotions, albeit a reliable and well-established finding, is further tuned by reinforced expectations-known to induce placebo/nocebo effects-which should be addressed in future research and considered in clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paul Pauli
- Department of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.,Center of Mental Health, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Camilla Mösler
- Department of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Matthias J Wieser
- Department of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.,Department of Psychology, Education, and Child Studies, University of Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
125
|
Sagy I, Abres J, Winnick A, Jotkowitz A. Placebos in the era of open-label trials: An update for clinicians. Eur J Clin Invest 2019; 49:e13038. [PMID: 30316203 DOI: 10.1111/eci.13038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2018] [Revised: 10/07/2018] [Accepted: 10/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Placebos have been used extensively by vast numbers of physicians, in a majority of clinical trials. Placebo effects involve behavioural, psychological and genetic factors and have been subject to ethical controversies stemming from the use of deception in treating patients. The patient-physician encounter, endogenous pharmacological pathways, personality traits and genetic diversity have all been reported to be key players in placebo responses. In the last decade, a new methodological paradigm of placebo research has emerged, using open-label placebos to investigate their effects which showed promising results for various common medical conditions. In this review, we will summarize the current body of evidence on placebos in clinical practice, with a view to open-label placebo trials in particular. It is our view that future larger-scale randomized blinded open placebo trials will benefit physicians and improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iftach Sagy
- Soroka University Medical Center and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.,Clinical Research Center, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Jonathan Abres
- Soroka University Medical Center and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Ariel Winnick
- Soroka University Medical Center and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Alan Jotkowitz
- Soroka University Medical Center and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
126
|
Malfliet A, Lluch Girbés E, Pecos-Martin D, Gallego-Izquierdo T, Valera-Calero A. The Influence of Treatment Expectations on Clinical Outcomes and Cortisol Levels in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain: An Experimental Study. Pain Pract 2019; 19:370-381. [PMID: 30457698 DOI: 10.1111/papr.12749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2018] [Revised: 11/13/2018] [Accepted: 11/14/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of contextual factors like pre-existing treatment expectations has been established. However, the effect of verbally delivered treatment expectations in patient-therapist communication has not been considered, nor has the role of cortisol changes within the placebo/nocebo response in people with chronic neck pain. OBJECTIVE To examine the effect of verbally delivered treatment expectations on clinical outcomes in physical therapy practice and to determine if changes in cortisol levels are associated with changes in neck pain and disability. METHODS Eighty-three patients with chronic neck pain were randomly allocated to 3 different verbally delivered expectations (positive, negative, neutral) during physical therapy interventions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES salivary cortisol, pain and disability, and cervical range of motion. RESULTS Pain significantly improved in the positive (P < 0.001) and neutral (P < 0.001) expectations groups. For salivary cortisol levels, a significant increase was observed in response to treatment in the neutral (P = 0.045) and negative (P < 0.001) expectations groups. No significant correlations were found between changes in salivary cortisol levels and the change in pain in the neutral and negative expectations groups. CONCLUSIONS Physical therapists treating people with chronic neck pain should be attentive when communicating the expected treatment effects to their patients. Whereas verbally delivered positive or neutral expectations may be beneficial for pain-related measures, giving negative expectations may result in a lack of a treatment response on pain. Cortisol levels increased in response to verbally delivered neutral and negative expectations, in the absence of a nocebo effect. This questions the presumed role of cortisol in the nocebo effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anneleen Malfliet
- Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium.,Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Enrique Lluch Girbés
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Physical Therapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Daniel Pecos-Martin
- Physiotherapy and Pain Group, Nursing and Physiotherapy Department, Alcala University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Thomas Gallego-Izquierdo
- Physiotherapy and Pain Group, Nursing and Physiotherapy Department, Alcala University, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
127
|
Skvortsova A, Veldhuijzen DS, Kloosterman IEM, Meijer OC, van Middendorp H, Pacheco-Lopez G, Evers AWM. Conditioned hormonal responses: A systematic review in animals and humans. Front Neuroendocrinol 2019; 52:206-218. [PMID: 30590067 DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2018.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2018] [Revised: 11/21/2018] [Accepted: 12/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
In contrast to classical conditioning of physiological responses such as immune responses and drug effects, only a limited number of studies investigated classical conditioning of endocrine responses. The present paper is the first systematic review that integrates evidence from animal and human trials regarding the possibility to condition the endocrine responses. Twenty-six animal and eight human studies were included in the review. We demonstrated that there is accumulating evidence that classical conditioning processes are able to influence specific endocrine responses, such as cortocosterone/cortisol and insulin, while more limited evidence exists for other hormones. Animal and human studies were generally consistent in their findings; however, the limited number of human studies makes it difficult to generalize and translate the results of animal research to humans. Next to methodological recommendations for future studies, we suggest several ways how classically conditioned endocrine responses can be used in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandrina Skvortsova
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University, 2333 AK Leiden, the Netherlands; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Dieuwke S Veldhuijzen
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University, 2333 AK Leiden, the Netherlands; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Iris E M Kloosterman
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University, 2333 AK Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Onno C Meijer
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Henriët van Middendorp
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University, 2333 AK Leiden, the Netherlands; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Gustavo Pacheco-Lopez
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University, 2333 AK Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Health Sciences, Campus Lerma, Metropolitan Autonomous University (UAM), 52006 Lerma, Edo Mex, Mexico
| | - Andrea W M Evers
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University, 2333 AK Leiden, the Netherlands; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
128
|
Olliges E, Schneider S, Schmidt G, Sinnecker D, Müller A, Burgdorf C, Braun S, Holdenrieder S, Ebell H, Ladwig KH, Meissner K, Ronel J. Placebo and Nocebo Effects in Patients With Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy and Heart-Healthy Controls. Front Psychiatry 2019; 10:549. [PMID: 31428002 PMCID: PMC6688659 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2018] [Accepted: 07/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The etiology of takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TTC)-a rare, reversible, and acquired form of cardiac diseases-is not yet fully explained. An exaggerated activation of the sympathetic-nervous-system (SNS) following stressful psychosocial life events is discussed to be of key importance. In this experimental study, we tested whether TTC patients, compared to heart-healthy controls, respond more strongly to supporting placebo interventions and stressful nocebo interventions targeting cardiac function. In a single experimental session, 20 female TTC patients and 20 age matched (mean age 61.5 years, ± 12.89) catheter-confirmed heart-healthy women were examined. Saline solution was administered three times i.v. to all participants, with the verbal suggestion they receive an inert substance with no effects on the heart (neutral condition), a drug that would support cardiac functions (positive condition), and a drug that would burden the heart (negative condition). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (DBP/SBP), heart rate (HR), endocrine markers cortisol (µg/dl), copeptin (pmol/l), and subjective stress ratings (SUD) were assessed to examine alterations of the SNS and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA). Before and after each intervention SUD was rated. One pre and three post serum cortisol and copeptin samples were assessed, and a long-term electrocardiogram as well as non-invasive, continuous blood pressure was recorded. The study design elucidated a significant increase of SUD levels as a response to the nocebo intervention, while perceived stress remained unaffected during the preceding neutral and positive interventions. Increasing SUD levels were accompanied by higher SBP and an anticipatory increase of HR shortly prior to the nocebo intervention. SBP increased also as a response to positive verbal suggestions (Bonferroni-corrected p-values > .05). Alterations of cortisol and copeptin due to the interventions and significant placebo effects failed to appear. Interestingly no differences between TCC patients and controls could be found.These findings do not support the assumption of an exaggerated activation of the SNS as a discriminatory factor for TTC. Since especially the nocebo intervention revealed negative subjective and objective effects, our results underscore the urgent need to consider carefully the impact of verbal suggestions in the interaction with cardiac patients in daily clinical routine. This study is registered at the Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien (DRKS00009296).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Olliges
- Institute of Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Simon Schneider
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitaet Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Georg Schmidt
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitaet Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Sinnecker
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitaet Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Müller
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitaet Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christof Burgdorf
- Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum Munich, Technische Universitaet Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Cardiology, Heart and Vascular Centre Bad Bevensen, Bad Bevensen, Germany
| | - Siegmund Braun
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum Munich, Technische Universitaet Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Holdenrieder
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum Munich, Technische Universitaet Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Karl-Heinz Ladwig
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitaet Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Epidemiology II, Helmholtz Zentrum, Munich, Germany
| | - Karin Meissner
- Institute of Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,Division of Health Promotion, Coburg University of Applied Sciences, Coburg, Germany
| | - Joram Ronel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitaet Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Klinik Barmelweid AG, Barmelweid, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
129
|
Geers AL, Briñol P, Petty RE. An Analysis of the Basic Processes of Formation and Change of Placebo Expectations. REVIEW OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY 2018. [DOI: 10.1037/gpr0000171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Placebo effects are the measurable psychological, biological, and behavioral changes that can result from expecting a treatment to be effective. Here we argue that not all expectations are created equally and there is much to learn by clarifying the psychological processes that underlie the expectations that cause placebo effects. It is proposed that the formation and change of placebo expectations can be understood from the standpoint of a general psychological model describing the basic processes of mental change. Specifically, we use the Elaboration Likelihood Model to explain how placebo-relevant variables (e.g., doctor’s lab coat, drug price, number and color of pills, patient’s mood) can work to affect expectations. Clarifying the antecedent processes responsible for placebo expectations leads to new insights regarding placebo effects, including their durability, directionality, and ability to alter subsequent behaviors (e.g., treatment adherence). A key point from our approach is that expectations causing placebo effects can be formed under high or low thought. High-thought expectations should be more likely to resist change, last over time, predict placebo effects better than low-thought expectations, and have a greater likelihood to alter subsequent behaviors. We conclude by describing a variety of theoretical innovations that this new conceptualization raises and suggest novel paths for research and application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pablo Briñol
- Department of Social Psychology and Methodology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
| | | |
Collapse
|
130
|
Belcher AM, Ferré S, Martinez PE, Colloca L. Role of placebo effects in pain and neuropsychiatric disorders. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2018; 87:298-306. [PMID: 28595945 PMCID: PMC5722709 DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2017] [Revised: 06/01/2017] [Accepted: 06/03/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The placebo (and the nocebo) effect is a powerful determinant of health outcomes in clinical disease treatment and management. Efforts to completely eradicate placebo effects have shifted dynamically, as increasingly more researchers are tuned to the potentially beneficial effects of incorporating those uncontrollable placebo effects into clinical therapeutic strategies. In this review, we highlight the major findings from placebo research, elucidating the main neurobiological systems and candidate determinants of the placebo phenomenon, and illustrate a perspective that can effectively frame future research on the topic. Finally, we issue a call for increased research on the efficacy of therapeutic strategies that incorporate placebo "tools," and argue that clinical trials of the placebo response in neuropsychiatric diseases and disorders has important and far-reaching translational and clinical relevance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annabelle M Belcher
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA
| | - Sergi Ferré
- National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - Pedro E Martinez
- National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - Luana Colloca
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA; Department of Pain and Translational Symptom Science, School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA; Department of Anesthesiology and Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA; Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
131
|
Meints SM, Edwards RR. Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2018; 87:168-182. [PMID: 29408484 PMCID: PMC6067990 DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 227] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2017] [Revised: 01/18/2018] [Accepted: 01/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The biopsychosocial model of pain dominates the scientific community's understanding of chronic pain. Indeed, the biopsychosocial approach describes pain and disability as a multidimensional, dynamic integration among physiological, psychological, and social factors that reciprocally influence one another. In this article, we review two categories of studies that evaluate the contributions of psychosocial factors to the experience of chronic pain. First, we consider general psychosocial variables including distress, trauma, and interpersonal factors. Additionally, we discuss pain-specific psychosocial variables including catastrophizing, expectations, and pain-related coping. Together, we present a diverse array of psychological, social, and contextual factors and highlight the need to consider their roles in the development, maintenance, and treatment of chronic pain conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S M Meints
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Management Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.
| | - R R Edwards
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Management Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
132
|
Hoffmann V, Lanz M, Mackert J, Müller T, Tschöp M, Meissner K. Effects of Placebo Interventions on Subjective and Objective Markers of Appetite-A Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Psychiatry 2018; 9:706. [PMID: 30618877 PMCID: PMC6305288 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2018] [Accepted: 12/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Patients' expectations about the benefit of an intervention are important determinants of the placebo effect. Little is known about the extent to which expectations influence outcomes of treatments in the field of appetite regulation. This study aimed to investigate the effects of treatment-related expectations on subjective and objective markers of appetite. Methods: 90 healthy participants of normal weight were randomly allocated to either an appetite-enhancing placebo group, a satiety-enhancing placebo group, or a control group. All participants received a placebo capsule along with group-specific verbal suggestions to either be appetite-promoting, or satiety-enhancing, or to have no effect on appetite. Before and during the 2 h following randomization, participants were repeatedly asked to rate feelings of hunger and satiety on visual analog scales (VAS), and blood samples were taken repeatedly to assess plasma ghrelin levels as a physiological marker of hunger. Results: In comparison to the control group, the satiety-enhancing placebo intervention significantly reduced appetite and increased satiety. The appetite-enhancing placebo intervention did not alter subjective levels of hunger, but increased plasma ghrelin levels in females. Conclusions: Results provide the first experimental evidence that appetite-regulating placebo interventions can elicit a psychobiological response. Expectations are important factors to consider when evaluating the effects of interventions in the field of appetite regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verena Hoffmann
- Institute of Medical Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marina Lanz
- Institute of Medical Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jennifer Mackert
- Institute of Medical Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Timo Müller
- Helmholtz Diabetes Center, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Munich, Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Garching bei München, Germany
| | - Matthias Tschöp
- Helmholtz Diabetes Center, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Munich, Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Garching bei München, Germany
| | - Karin Meissner
- Institute of Medical Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Division of Health Promotion, Coburg University of Applied Sciences, Coburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
133
|
Abstract
This article provides an overarching view of what is currently known about the physiology of the brain-gut axis in both health and disease and how these concepts apply to irritable bowel syndrome, the most common functional gastrointestinal disorder in pediatrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Khlevner
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 630 West 168th Street, PH 17, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Yeji Park
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 630 West 168th Street, PH 17, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Kara Gross Margolis
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 630 West 168th Street, PH 17, New York, NY 10032, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
134
|
Turi Z, Bjørkedal E, Gunkel L, Antal A, Paulus W, Mittner M. Evidence for Cognitive Placebo and Nocebo Effects in Healthy Individuals. Sci Rep 2018; 8:17443. [PMID: 30487547 PMCID: PMC6261963 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-35124-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2018] [Accepted: 10/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Inactive interventions can have significant effects on cognitive performance. Understanding the generation of these cognitive placebo/nocebo effects is crucial for evaluating the cognitive impacts of interventional methods, such as non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS). We report both cognitive placebo and nocebo effects on reward-based learning performance induced using an active sham NIBS protocol, verbal suggestions and conditioning in 80 healthy participants. Whereas our placebo manipulation increased both expected and perceived cognitive performance, nocebo had a detrimental effect on both. Model-based analysis suggests manipulation-specific strategic adjustments in learning-rates: Participants in the placebo group showed stronger learning from losses and reduced behavioral noise, participants in the nocebo group showed stronger learning from gains and increased behavioral noise. We conclude that experimentally induced expectancy can impact cognitive functions of healthy adult participants. This has important implications for the use of double-blind study designs that can effectively maintain blinding in NIBS studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zsolt Turi
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Espen Bjørkedal
- Institute for Psychology, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Luisa Gunkel
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Andrea Antal
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Walter Paulus
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
135
|
De Pascalis V, Scacchia P. The influence of reward sensitivity, heart rate dynamics and EEG-delta activity on placebo analgesia. Behav Brain Res 2018; 359:320-332. [PMID: 30439452 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2018.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2018] [Revised: 10/10/2018] [Accepted: 11/08/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Personality traits have been shown to interact with environmental cues to modulate biological responses including treatment responses, and potentially having a role in the formation of placebo effects. Here we used the Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory Personality Questionnaire (RST-PQ) to identify personality traits that predict placebo analgesic responding. Cardiac inter-beat (RR) time series and electroencephalographic (EEG) band oscillations were recorded from healthy women in a cold-pain (Pain) and placebo analgesia (PA) condition. The measures of Hypnotizability, and self-reported ratings of Hypnotic Depth, Motivation, Pain Expectation, Involuntariness in PA responding, Pain and Distress intensity were obtained. Separate principal components factor analyses with varimax rotation were performed on summarized heart rate variability (HRV) measures of time, frequency, nonlinear Complexity, and EEG-band activity. Both analyses yielded a similar three-factor solution including Frequency HRV (factor-1), Complexity HRV dynamics (factor-2), and time HRV & EEG-delta activity (factor-3). Reward Interest sub-trait of the Behavioral Approach System (BAS-RI), Pain Expectation, Involuntariness in PA responding, and Hypnotic Depth were positively associated, whereas negative changes in time-HRV & EEG-delta scores were associated with Pain Reduction. Multiple mediation analyses disclosed that BAS-RI, potentially served by the dopaminergic system, through Involuntariness in PA responding can alter placebo responding to laboratory pain. Our results also show that a linear compound of HR slowing and higher EEG delta activity during PA explains a substantial proportion of the variance in placebo analgesic responses. Future studies should examine the potential role that these individual difference measures may play in patient responsiveness to treatments for clinical pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V De Pascalis
- Department of Psychology "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.
| | - P Scacchia
- Department of Psychology "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
136
|
Puviani L, Rama S. Understanding and exploiting prediction errors minimization within the brain in pharmacological treatments. Behav Brain Res 2018; 359:223-233. [PMID: 30395877 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2018.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2018] [Revised: 10/14/2018] [Accepted: 10/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The human brain can be conceptualized as an inference machine that actively predicts and explains its sensations and perceptions: it makes predictions through a probabilistic model. Such a model is continuously and implicitly updated by the computation and minimization of weighted prediction errors, as shown by numerous studies and experimental results. Nevertheless, such an algorithmic functioning of the brain has not been exploited in the neuropharmacological practice. In this manuscript, we show by theoretical analysis and model fitting of previously published data in two different contexts, how it is possible to increase the effectiveness of neuropharmacological and immunosuppressive drugs, through the modulation of the weighted prediction errors. Moreover, on the basis of the proposed model, we derive an optimized drug administration schedule able to increase the drug effectiveness of one order of magnitude, in psoriasis treatment. We make important testable predictions, evidencing the impact and the potential benefit of prediction errors modulation within the brain, in the pharmacotherapeutic practice. Finally, our results lead to a novel formal theory of implicit learning, and shed lights on the actual roles of classical conditioning and UCS revaluation in behavioral and pharmacological conditioning experiments. The potential practical implications of our results are many: the reduction of drugs side effects; the maximization of the therapeutic outcome; a more effective treatment for chronic pain, certain neuropsychiatric diseases, autoimmune diseases and allergic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Puviani
- University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, via Vivarelli 10, Modena, Italy.
| | - Sidita Rama
- Local Medical Unit, Via San Giovanni del Cantone, 23, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
137
|
Bajcar EA, Bąbel P. How Does Observational Learning Produce Placebo Effects? A Model Integrating Research Findings. Front Psychol 2018; 9:2041. [PMID: 30405506 PMCID: PMC6207615 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2018] [Accepted: 10/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
There is a growing body of evidence proving that observational learning, in addition to classical conditioning and verbal suggestions, may induce both placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia. However, much less is known about the mechanisms and factors influencing placebo effects induced by observational learning. The paper critically reviews the research findings in the field in the context of Bandura’s social learning theory. We apply Bandura’s taxonomy of the sources of social learning (behavioral, symbolic, and verbal modeling) and discuss the results of previous studies. Critical points in the placebo effects induced by observational learning are identified. We discuss aspects of behavior presented by the model (both verbal and non-verbal) involved in the formation of placebo effects induced by observational learning as well as the role of expectancies in this process. As a result, we propose a model that integrates the existing research findings. The model shows the main ways of transmission of pain-related information from the model to the observer. It highlights the role of expectancies and the individual characteristics of the observer in formation of placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia induced by observational learning. Finally, we propose future research directions based on our model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elżbieta A Bajcar
- Pain Research Group, Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland
| | - Przemysław Bąbel
- Pain Research Group, Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
138
|
The interplay of exercise, placebo and nocebo effects on experimental pain. Sci Rep 2018; 8:14758. [PMID: 30283022 PMCID: PMC6170492 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-32974-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2018] [Accepted: 09/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the last few decades, placebo, and nocebo effects in general, have been investigated at rest. This proposed study explores whether they could work even when the experience of pain occurs during a movement. Exercise itself can have a hypoalgesic effect, suggesting that placebo- and exercise-induced hypoalgesia could foster pain reduction. In the present study, we investigated the interplay of exercise, placebo and nocebo effects on pain. To this aim, we developed a machine-controlled isotonic motor task to standardize the exercise across participants and used a well-validated model of placebo and nocebo manipulations with reinforced expectations via a conditioning procedure including visual cues paired with heat painful stimulations. Participants reported expectations and pain on a trial-by-trial basis. We found that the standardized isotonic exercise elicited a reduction of pain intensity. Moreover, both exercise and placebo induced comparable hypoalgesic effects. When the exercise was added, placebo and nocebo effects were influenced by expectations but were not affected by fatigue or sex differences. Exercise-, placebo- and nocebo-induced pain modulation are likely to work through distinct mechanisms and neurophysiological research is needed to fully exploit the implications for sport, rehabilitation and pain management.
Collapse
|
139
|
Abstract
Pharmacological strategies for pain management have primarily focused on dampening ascending neurotransmission and on opioid receptor-mediated therapies. Little is known about the contribution of endogenous descending modulatory systems to clinical pain outcomes and why some patients are mildly affected while others suffer debilitating pain-induced dysfunctions. Placebo effects that arise from patients' positive expectancies and the underlying endogenous modulatory mechanisms may in part account for the variability in pain experience and severity, adherence to treatment, distinct coping strategies, and chronicity. Expectancy-induced analgesia and placebo effects in general have emerged as useful models to assess individual endogenous pain modulatory systems. Different systems and mechanisms trigger placebo effects that highly impact pain processing, clinical outcomes, and sense of well-being. This review illustrates critical elements of placebo mechanisms that inform the methodology of clinical trials, the discovery of new therapeutic targets, and the advancement of personalized pain management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luana Colloca
- Department of Pain and Translational Symptom Science, School of Nursing; Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine; and Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
140
|
A Context-Based Analgesia Model in Rats: Involvement of Prefrontal Cortex. Neurosci Bull 2018; 34:1047-1057. [PMID: 30178433 PMCID: PMC6246847 DOI: 10.1007/s12264-018-0279-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2018] [Accepted: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Cognition and pain share common neural substrates and interact reciprocally: chronic pain compromises cognitive performance, whereas cognitive processes modulate pain perception. In the present study, we established a non-drug-dependent rat model of context-based analgesia, where two different contexts (dark and bright) were matched with a high (52°C) or low (48°C) temperature in the hot-plate test during training. Before and after training, we set the temperature to the high level in both contexts. Rats showed longer paw licking latencies in trials with the context originally matched to a low temperature than those to a high temperature, indicating successful establishment of a context-based analgesic effect in rats. This effect was blocked by intraperitoneal injection of naloxone (an opioid receptor antagonist) before the probe. The context-based analgesic effect also disappeared after optogenetic activation or inhibition of the bilateral infralimbic or prelimbic sub-region of the prefrontal cortex. In brief, we established a context-based, non-drug dependent, placebo-like analgesia model in the rat. This model provides a new and useful tool for investigating the cognitive modulation of pain.
Collapse
|
141
|
Mestre TA, Shamy M, Benedetti F, Lang AE. Harnessing the power of placebos in movement disorders: Insights from Parkinson's disease in clinical research and practice. Mov Disord 2018; 33:1195-1203. [PMID: 30145820 DOI: 10.1002/mds.27409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2018] [Revised: 03/13/2018] [Accepted: 03/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The placebo effect alongside the detrimental nocebo and lessebo effects associated with the use of placebos are well-recognized phenomena. Research conducted in the last two decades has demonstrated that the placebo effect is a measurable health benefit with well-known neurobiological correlates. In this review, we describe the current knowledge about how to best make use of the placebo effect to improve clinical research and optimize clinical care. We will cover four key topics: (1) setting the stage: historical perspectives on the use of placebos; (2) optimizing the use of placebos in clinical trials; (3) use of placebos in clinical practice; and (4) how can we minimize the ethical risks of using placebos? The adoption of the placebo-controlled trial as a standard in the therapeutic development reduced the placebo effect to background noise in a therapeutic signal. Strategies to minimize the placebo effect in clinical trials have been used to obtain positive efficacy results. In more recent years, new study paradigms encouraged a change in the views on placebos and the placebo effect. Alternative study designs and the development of biomarkers for a placebo response permit a better understanding of the contribution of the placebo effect to the results of interventional studies, without minimizing it. In clinical practice, optimizing the placebo effect (and reducing nocebo effects) has the potential to improve care for our patients, but raises ethical challenges. An enhanced patient-physician relationship would be central to any evidence-based intervention used in clinical care to heighten the placebo effect. © 2018 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiago A Mestre
- Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Center, Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa Brain and Mind Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michel Shamy
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa Brain and Mind Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fabrizio Benedetti
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin Medical School, Turin, Italy
| | - Anthony E Lang
- Edmond J Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease and the Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
142
|
Witek N, Stebbins GT, Goetz CG. What influences placebo and nocebo responses in Parkinson's disease? Mov Disord 2018; 33:1204-1212. [DOI: 10.1002/mds.27416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2017] [Revised: 03/27/2018] [Accepted: 03/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Witek
- Rush Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Program; Chicago Illinois USA
| | - Glenn T. Stebbins
- Rush Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Program; Chicago Illinois USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
143
|
Pires FO, Dos Anjos CAS, Covolan RJM, Fontes EB, Noakes TD, St Clair Gibson A, Magalhães FH, Ugrinowitsch C. Caffeine and Placebo Improved Maximal Exercise Performance Despite Unchanged Motor Cortex Activation and Greater Prefrontal Cortex Deoxygenation. Front Physiol 2018; 9:1144. [PMID: 30246799 PMCID: PMC6113857 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2017] [Accepted: 07/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Caffeine (CAF) is an ergogenic aid used to improve exercise performance. Independent studies have suggested that caffeine may have the ability to increase corticospinal excitability, thereby decreasing the motor cortex activation required to generate a similar motor output. However, CAF has also been suggested to induce a prefrontal cortex (PFC) deoxygenation. Others have suggested that placebo (PLA) may trigger comparable effects to CAF, as independent studies found PLA effects on motor performance, corticospinal excitability, and PFC oxygenation. Thus, we investigated if CAF and CAF-perceived PLA may improve motor performance, despite the likely unchanged MC activation and greater PFC deoxygenation. Nine participants (26.4 ± 4.8 years old, VO2MAX of 42.2 ± 4.6 mL kg-1 min-1) performed three maximal incremental tests (MITs) in control (no supplementation) and ∼60 min after CAF and PLA ingestion. PFC oxygenation (near-infrared spectroscopy at Fp1 position), MC activation (EEG at Cz position) and vastus lateralis and rectus femoris muscle activity (EMG) were measured throughout the tests. Compared to control, CAF and PLA increased rectus femoris muscle EMG (P = 0.030; F = 2.88; d = 0.84) at 100% of the MIT, and enhanced the peak power output (P = 0.006; F = 12.97; d = 1.8) and time to exhaustion (P = 0.007; F = 12.97; d = 1.8). In contrast, CAF and PLA did not change MC activation, but increased the PFC deoxygenation as indicated by the lower O2Hb (P = 0.001; F = 4.68; d = 1.08) and THb concentrations (P = 0.01; F = 1.96; d = 0.7) at 80 and 100% the MIT duration. These results showed that CAF and CAF-perceived PLA had the ability to improve motor performance, despite unchanged MC activation and greater PFC deoxygenation. The effectiveness of CAF as ergogenic aid to improve MIT performance was challenged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flavio O Pires
- Exercise Psychophysiology Research Group, School of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Carlos A S Dos Anjos
- Neurophysics Group, Gleb Wataghin Physics Institute, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Roberto J M Covolan
- Neurophysics Group, Gleb Wataghin Physics Institute, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Eduardo B Fontes
- Research Group in Physical Activity, Cognition and Behavior, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil
| | - Timothy D Noakes
- Sports Science Institute of South Africa, Department of Human Biology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | - Fernando H Magalhães
- Exercise Psychophysiology Research Group, School of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Carlos Ugrinowitsch
- School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
144
|
Damien J, Colloca L, Bellei-Rodriguez CÉ, Marchand S. Pain Modulation: From Conditioned Pain Modulation to Placebo and Nocebo Effects in Experimental and Clinical Pain. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF NEUROBIOLOGY 2018; 139:255-296. [PMID: 30146050 DOI: 10.1016/bs.irn.2018.07.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Accumulating evidence reveal important applications of endogenous pain modulation assessment in healthy controls and in patients in clinical settings, as dysregulations in the balance of pain modulatory circuits may facilitate pain and promote chronification of pain. This article reviews data on pain modulation, focusing on the mechanisms and translational aspects of pain modulation from conditioned pain modulation (CPM) to placebo and nocebo effects in experimental and clinical pain. The specific roles of expectations, learning, neural and neurophysiological mechanisms of the central nervous system are briefly reviewed herein. The interaction between CPM and placebo systems in pain inhibitory pathways is highly relevant in the clinic and in randomized controlled trials yet remains to be clarified. Examples of clinical implications of CPM and its relationship to placebo and nocebo effects are provided. A greater understanding of the role of pain modulation in various pain states can help characterize the manifestation and development of chronic pain and assist in predicting the response to pain-relieving treatments. Placebo and nocebo effects, intrinsic to every treatment, can be used to develop personalized therapeutic approaches that improve clinical outcomes while limiting unwanted effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janie Damien
- Research Center of the Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS), Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Luana Colloca
- Department of Pain Translational Symptom Science, School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States; Departments of Psychiatry and Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Carmen-Édith Bellei-Rodriguez
- Research Center of the Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS), Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Serge Marchand
- Research Center of the Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS), Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Santé (FRQS), Montréal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
145
|
Fiorio M. Modulation of the Motor System by Placebo and Nocebo Effects. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF NEUROBIOLOGY 2018; 139:297-319. [PMID: 30146052 DOI: 10.1016/bs.irn.2018.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
There is strong behavioral evidence that placebo and nocebo effects can influence aspects of motor performance like speed, force, and resistance to fatigue in athletes and non-athletes alike. These behavioral studies were essential for extending experimental investigation of the placebo and nocebo effects from the pain to the motor domain and to reveal how verbal suggestions and experiential learning are involved in shaping modulatory systems and related behavioral responses. However, the neural underpinnings of these effects in the motor domain are still largely unknown. Studies in healthy subjects demonstrated that the placebo-induced enhancement of force is associated with increased activity in the corticospinal system and that the placebo-induced reduction of fatigue can be disclosed by recording the readiness potential, an electrophysiological sign of movement preparation. Further evidence derives from studies in patients with Parkinson's disease that have directly demonstrated that placebo-induced improvements in motor symptoms are related to changes in subcortical neural firing activity and dopamine release. Future investigations are needed to better clarify the complex neural architecture underpinning the placebo and nocebo effects in the motor domain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirta Fiorio
- Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
146
|
Coleshill MJ, Sharpe L, Colloca L, Zachariae R, Colagiuri B. Placebo and Active Treatment Additivity in Placebo Analgesia: Research to Date and Future Directions. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF NEUROBIOLOGY 2018; 139:407-441. [PMID: 30146056 PMCID: PMC6179351 DOI: 10.1016/bs.irn.2018.07.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Placebo analgesia is a robust experimental and clinical phenomenon. While our understanding of the mechanisms of placebo analgesia has developed rapidly, some central questions remain unanswered. Among the important questions is how placebo analgesia interacts with active analgesic effects. It is an assumption underlying double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) that the true effect of a treatment can be determined by examining the effect of the active treatment arm and subtracting the response in the placebo group ("the assumption of additivity"). However, despite the importance of this assumption for the interpretation of RCTs, it has rarely been formally examined. This article reviews the assumption of additivity in placebo analgesia by examining studies employing factorial designs manipulating both the receipt of an active analgesic and instructions about the treatment being delivered. In reviewing the literature, we identified seven studies that allowed a test of additivity. Of these, four found evidence against additivity, while the remaining three studies found results consistent with additivity. While the limited available data are somewhat mixed, the evidence suggests that at least under some conditions the assumption of additivity does not hold in placebo analgesia. The concordance between mechanisms of the active analgesic and placebo analgesia may influence whether additivity occurs or not. However, more research using factorial designs is needed to disentangle the relationship between placebo analgesia and the active effect of analgesic treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Coleshill
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; St Vincent's Clinical School, St Vincent's Hospital, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Louise Sharpe
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Luana Colloca
- Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States; School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States; School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Robert Zachariae
- Aarhus University Hospital and Department of Psychology and Behavioural Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ben Colagiuri
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
147
|
Flaten MA, Bjørkedal E, Lyby PS, Figenschau Y, Aslaksen PM. Failure to Find a Conditioned Placebo Analgesic Response. Front Psychol 2018; 9:1198. [PMID: 30104988 PMCID: PMC6077950 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2018] [Accepted: 06/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Associative learning has, in several studies, been modulated by the sex of the participant. Consistent with this, a recent review found that conditioned nocebo effects are stronger in females than in males. Purpose: It has been suggested that conditioned placebo responses are stronger in females, and this hypothesis was investigated in the present study. Cortisol and measures of negative emotions were taken to investigate if these processes could mediate any conditioned placebo effects. Methods: Cold pain was applied to the volar forearm. The Conditioned group received inert capsules prior to two presentations of less painful stimulations, to associate intake of the capsules with reduced pain. The pain control group received the same painful stimulation as the Conditioned group, but no capsules. The Capsule control group received the capsules in the same way as the Conditioned group, but no decrease in the painful stimulation. Participant sex was crossed across groups. It was hypothesized that in the Conditioned group, an expectation of reduced pain should be induced after administration of the capsules, and this should generate placebo analgesia, and mostly so in females. Results: The Conditioned group reported lower pain during conditioning, and rated the capsules as more effective painkillers than the capsule control group. However, placebo analgesia was not reliably observed in the Conditioned group. Conclusion: The placebo capsules were rated as effective painkillers, but this did not translate into a placebo analgesic effect. This could be due to violation of response expectancies, too few conditioning trials, and differences in pain ratings in the pre-test that could be due to previous experience with painkillers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magne A Flaten
- Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Espen Bjørkedal
- Department of Psychology, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Peter S Lyby
- Department of Psychology, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Yngve Figenschau
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway.,Department of Medical Biochemistry, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Per M Aslaksen
- Department of Psychology, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
148
|
Analay Akbaba Y, Kaya Mutlu E, Altun S, Celik D. Does the patients' expectations on kinesiotape affect the outcomes of patients with a rotator cuff tear? A randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Rehabil 2018; 32:1509-1519. [PMID: 30045638 DOI: 10.1177/0269215518779645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of setting expectations verbally on the effectiveness of kinesiotape application in patients with a rotator cuff tear. DESIGN: Randomized controlled, double-blind study. SETTING: Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation. SUBJECTS: Eighty-nine patients with rotator cuff tear. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized according to the verbal input given to patients about the effectiveness of kinesiotaping; Group 1 (there is no evidence that kinesiotaping is effective), Group 2 (there is limited evidence that kinesiotaping is effective), and Group 3 (there is evidence that kinesiotaping has an excellent effect). MAIN MEASURES: Resting pain, activity pain, and night pain were assessed by visual analog scale. Range of motion was assessed by a universal goniometer. Function was evaluated by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form before and 24 hours after kinesiotape application. Only resting pain and activity pain were assessed after 30 minutes. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences (ANOVA) between any groups at the three assessment points. The intragroup assessment showed that in Group 2, only resting pain after 30 minutes improved (3.2 ± 2.9 to 2.6 ± 2.8; P = 0.02 ). An improvement in resting pain both after 30 minutes and after 24 hours was found in the third group (4.1 ± 2.4 to 2.3 ± 2.3, P = 0.001; 4.1 ± 2.4 to 2.2 ± 2.3, P = 0.001, respectively). Activity pain and night pain were improved in all groups after 24 hours. CONCLUSION: Setting positive expectations verbally about kinesiotaping might be effective in reducing pain in patients with rotator cuff tear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yildiz Analay Akbaba
- 1 Division of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ebru Kaya Mutlu
- 1 Division of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Suleyman Altun
- 2 Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Derya Celik
- 1 Division of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
149
|
Placebo analgesia persists during sleep: An experimental study. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2018; 85:33-38. [PMID: 29631002 DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.03.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2018] [Revised: 03/29/2018] [Accepted: 03/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Although placebo analgesia is a well-recognized phenomenon with important clinical implications, the possibility that placebo effects occur during sleep has received little attention. This experimental study examined whether responsiveness to acute heat pain stimuli applied during sleep could be reduced following a placebo conditioning procedure administered before sleep. Healthy individuals (n = 9) underwent polysomnographic recordings for one habituation night followed by one placebo analgesia night and one control night in counterbalanced order. Conditioning induced robust analgesia expectations before the placebo night. In the morning after the placebo night, participants reported less nocturnal pain, anxiety, and associated sleep disturbance (all p's < 0.05) compared to the control night. Furthermore, placebo induction produced a 10% reduction in brain arousals evoked by noxious stimuli during rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep (p = 0.03), consistent with our previous findings suggesting that analgesia expectations are reprocessed during REM sleep. In contrast, arousals increased by 14% during slow wave sleep (SWS) (p = 0.02). In the morning after the last recording night, placebo testing administered as a manipulation check confirmed that typical placebo analgesic responses were produced during waking (p's < 0.05). These results suggest that analgesia expectations developed before sleep reduced nocturnal pain perception and subjective sleep disturbances and activated brain processes that modulate incoming nociceptive signals differentially according to sleep stage. These results need to be replicated in future studies exploring how analgesia expectations may be reactivated during different sleep stages to modulate nociceptive responses.
Collapse
|
150
|
Effects of balneotherapy and spa therapy on quality of life of patients with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatol Int 2018; 38:1807-1824. [DOI: 10.1007/s00296-018-4081-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2018] [Accepted: 06/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|