Cardioversion guided by transesophageal echocardiography: the ACUTE Pilot Study. A randomized, controlled trial. Assessment of Cardioversion Using Transesophageal Echocardiography

Cost-effective management of acute atrial fibrillation: role of rate control, spontaneous conversion, medical and direct current cardioversion, transesophageal echocardiography, and antiembolic therapy

Management strategies for the acute treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) include: (1) the use of intravenous drugs for rate control, (2) drug termination, or (3) direct current (DC) cardioversion. Delays in cardioversion can promote atrial remodeling and add thromboembolic risk. Rate control awaiting spontaneous or pharmacologic conversion may be a cost-effective strategy in patients presenting with recent onset of symptoms. Early DC cardioversion can be cost-effective and minimize antiembolic therapy issues in the acute setting. In patients presenting with AF of unknown or >48 hours' duration, rate control and therapeutic warfarin for 3-4 weeks followed by medical or DC cardioversion is standard practice. However, delays in conversion promote atrial remodeling that makes restoration of sinus rhythm more difficult and increases the likelihood of postcardioversion AF recurrence. Transesophageal echocardiography can identify patients at low risk for a cardioversion-related embolic event and allows cardioversion to be performed earlier, thereby minimizing atrial remodeling.

Transesophageal echocardiography-guided cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

Transesophageal echocardiography-guided anticoagulation management of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardioversion has evolved over the past decade as a viable alternative to conventional anticoagulation management. Its use grew out of a need for a more predictable, dependable, and convenient approach to this difficult management dilemma, which has become increasingly prevalent in practice as an increasing number of patients present to clinics and hospitals with atrial fibrillation. In addition to its use in risk stratification of patients scheduled to undergo cardioversion, this management strategy allows for early cardioversion, which enables a minimal delay in proceeding from the diagnosis to the institution of therapy (electrical cardioversion). This review explores the evolution of the transesophageal echocardiography-guided strategy, the advantages and disadvantages of its use, and possible modifications to the strategy that would allow for a more convenient, practical, and more widely acceptable approach in the near future.

National use of the transesophageal echocardiographic-guided approach to cardioversion for patients in atrial fibrillation

Transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE)-guided cardioversion of patients in atrial fibrillation (AF) of >2 days' duration is used as an alternative to conventional therapy. The purpose of this study was to investigate practice patterns employed for stroke prophylaxis in patients with AF who underwent cardioversion, and to determine the relative use of conventional and TEE-guided management strategies. We forwarded regionally stratified survey questionnaires to 947 clinical practices within the United States. The 10-question questionnaire queried demographic and clinical practice volumes and practices for managing patients with AF who underwent cardioversion. In addition, we used historical data to determine longitudinal use patterns of the TEE-guided approach for a large institution over 7 years. The 197 completed and returned surveys yielded a return rate of 20.8%. The TEE-guided approach was employed in approximately 12% of total cardioversions, but 75% of practices indicated that they employed transesophageal echocardiography only occasionally. The TEE-guided approach was associated with community size (r = 0.19; p<0.008), type of practice (r = 0.26; p = 0.001), total use of transesophageal echocardiography (r = 0.48; p<0.001), and volume of cardioversions (r = 0.28; p<0.001). Importantly, there was little consensus on the most appropriate clinical indications for TEE-guided cardioversions, and the proportions of TEE-guided cardioversion to total number of electrical cardioversions remained stable over 7 years. Practice volume and physician training may be the most important variables in the adoption of the TEE approach.

Clinical implication of antiembolic trials in atrial fibrillation and role of transesophageal echocardiography in atrial fibrillation

Risk for stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is highly heterogeneous. Increasing age, history of diabetes, hypertension, previous transient ischemic attack or stroke, and poor ventricular function are independent risk factors for stroke in patients with AF. Accordingly, some groups of patients with AF have low risk and some have high risk. In general, patients at high risk benefit most from anticoagulation therapy with warfarin. In general, if a patient is younger than 65 years of age and has none of the defined risk factors, the stroke rate without prophylaxis (aspirin or warfarin) is low. In patients 65 to 75 years of age with no risk factors, the risk for stroke is low with either aspirin or warfarin therapy; the choice is left to the caretaking physician. All patients older than 75 years and all patients of any age who have risk factors obtain striking benefit from the use of anticoagulation with warfarin. This benefit far outweighs any risk for major hemorrhage.

Cost-effective strategies in the acute management of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained arrhythmia likely to be encountered in clinical practice. It is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation can be complex and costly, especially when patients are hospitalized for acute management of this arrhythmia. In this review, we summarize current approaches to the acute management of atrial fibrillation with an emphasis on the most cost-effective approaches. We review acute methods of heart rate control and cardioversion, including pharmacologic and other minimally invasive strategies. We believe that the most cost-effective approaches may require the use of standardized clinical pathways. This may help to ensure that patients with acute atrial fibrillation receive the most effective and efficient care.

Left atrial appendage anatomy and function: short term response to sustained atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether there is significant atrial or atrial appendage enlargement or functional remodelling as a result of one to two months of sustained atrial fibrillation, a duration similar to that experienced by patients undergoing warfarin anticoagulation before elective cardioversion.

METHODS

To test the hypothesis that left atrial and left atrial appendage enlargement develop as a result of short term atrial fibrillation, serial anatomical and functional indices were measured using transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) in 20 patients with recent onset atrial fibrillation (14 men, six women; mean (SEM) age 67 (2) years). Serial TOE was performed 2.5 months apart in patients with sustained atrial fibrillation.

RESULTS

There was no significant change in left atrial area (23.7 cm(2) to 24.1 cm(2), p = 0.98); length (5.7 cm to 5.7 cm, p = 0.48); width (5.2 cm to 5.2 cm, p = 0. 65); volume (83 cm(3) to 87 cm(3), p = 0.51) or left atrial appendage area (7.9 cm(2) to 8.1 cm(2), p = 0.89); length (4.6 cm to 4.5 cm, p = 0.8); or width (2.5 to 2.4 cm, p = 0.87). Peak left atrial appendage velocity ejection (0.2 m/s to 0.2 m/s, p = 0.57), and presence of severe spontaneous echo contrast in the left atrial appendage (n = 15 (75%) to n = 13 (72%)) were also not significantly different. There was no correlation between changes in left atrial or left atrial appendage dimensions.

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of sustained atrial fibrillation, significant left atrial and left atrial appendage functional and anatomical remodelling do not occur with atrial fibrillation of a duration similar to that used for conservative anticoagulation in preparation for cardioversion.

Right atrial appendage thrombosis in atrial fibrillation: its frequency and its clinical predictors

This study assesses the incidence of right atrial (RA) chamber and appendage thrombosis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in relation to RA appendage morphology and function. Transthoracic and multiplane transesophageal echocardiography were performed in 102 patients with AF to assess the incidence of RA and left atrial (LA) thrombi and spontaneous echo contrast. Both right and left ventricular sizes, atrial chamber and appendage sizes and function were measured. Twenty-two patients in sinus rhythm served as the control group (SR). Complete visualization of the RA appendage was feasible in 90 patients with AF. Patients with AF had lower tricuspid annular excursion (p = 0.008) and larger RA chamber area (p = 0.0001) than patients in SR. In addition, RA appendage areas were larger (p <0.05) and RA ejection fraction and peak emptying velocities (both p <0.0001) were lower in patients with AF patients than in those in SR. Equivalent differences were found for the LA appendage. Six thrombi were found in the RA appendage and 11 thrombi in the LA appendage in AF patients. Spontaneous echo contrast was found in 57% and 66% in the right atrium and in the left atrium, respectively. AF patients with RA appendage thrombi had a larger RA area (p = 0.0001), and lower RA appendage ejection fraction and emptying velocities (both p = 0.0001) than patients without thrombi. Spontaneous echo contrast was detected in all patients with thrombi. Spontaneous echo contrast was the only independent predictor of RA (p = 0.03) and LA appendage thrombosis (p = 0.036). In conclusion, multiplane transesophageal echocardiography allows the assessment of RA appendage morphology and function. RA spontaneous echo contrast is the only independent predictor of RA appendage thrombosis.

Transcranial Doppler evaluation of microembolism immediately after direct-current cardioversion for atrial fibrillation in anticoagulated patients

Transcranial Doppler monitoring showed no evidence of microemboli for 10 minutes after direct-current cardioversion for atrial fibrillation.

Cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation and left atrial thrombi on initial transesophageal echocardiography: should transesophageal echocardiography be repeated before elective cardioversion? A cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is used to expedite early cardioversion for patients with atrial fibrillation in whom TEE excludes the presence of atrial thrombi. However, the management of patients with atrial thrombi on initial TEE is controversial. Some advocate cardioversion after 3 to 4 weeks of anticoagulant therapy, whereas others perform a follow-up TEE to document thrombus resolution. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis to compare the two strategies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A computer-based decision analysis model was used to compared 2 strategies: No Follow-up TEE-patients with thrombi on initial TEE complete 4 weeks of anticoagulation and undergo elective cardioversion. Follow-up TEE-patients undergo a follow-up TEE after 4 weeks of anticoagulant therapy. If a thrombus is detected, cardioversion is not performed and patients remain in atrial fibrillation; patients without a thrombus undergo cardioversion. Under our baseline estimates, the Follow-up TEE strategy is less costly and slightly more effective than the No Follow-up TEE strategy. The results are most sensitive to changes in the risk of postcardioversion stroke for patients with atrial thrombi on initial TEE who have completed 4 weeks of anticoagulation and to the probability of residual thrombi on follow-up TEE.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cost-effectiveness analysis for patients with atrial fibrillation and left atrial thrombi detected on initial TEE, a Follow-up TEE strategy may be more cost-effective than the No Follow-up TEE strategy. However, the decision is particularly dependent on the risk of postcardioversion stroke in patients with undetected residual left atrial thrombi.

Management of atrial fibrillation: out-of-hospital approach

Atrial fibrillation is increasingly common with advancing age and is responsible for 10% of the half-million strokes that occur annually in the United States. When a patient presents with atrial fibrillation, the physician's first task is to use the history, physical examination, and electrocardiogram to determine whether hospitalization is necessary. Factors indicating a need for hospital care include evidence of infarction or ischemia, congestive heart failure, hypotension or hypoperfusion, excessive rate, or pre-excitation. In addition, if the episode began within 48 hours, consider early cardioversion, which also requires hospitalization. Next, the need for control of the ventricular rate should be assessed. A heart rate under 90 beats/min at rest and under 120 beats/min after 1 minute of step exercise is a reasonable goal. Dixogin usually controls the resting rate, but sometimes beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers are needed to control the exercise rate. The need for anticoagulation is determined by the presence of clinical risk factors such as valvular heart disease, previous thromboembolism, hypertension, age over 65 years, congestive heart failure, and left atrial enlargement. An echocardiogram is necessary to complete this assessment. Patients having one or more of these risk factors are most effectively treated with warfarin, as evident from several clinical trials. Although patients over age 65 demonstrate reduced thromboembolism with warfarin therapy, they also are more prone to cerebral hemorrhage, thus, their international normalization ratio (INR) should be kept at the lower end of the therapeutic range [2,3]. Other patients can be treated with aspirin, although stroke reduction in these patients may be more related to reduction of arterial thrombosis than thromboembolism. Patients under age 65 with no risk factors have a very low annual risk of stroke without therapy (approximately 1%). If symptoms persist or if this is a first episode in someone without left atrial enlargement, cardioversion can be considered after 3 weeks of warfarin therapy with INR in the therapeutic range. Otherwise, warfarin should be continued indefinitely. Prevention of recurrence with antiarrhythmic drugs is somewhat problematic because of incomplete efficacy (30% recurrence at 1 year) and the potential for inducing other, life-threatening arrhythmias.

Acute treatment of atrial fibrillation: spontaneous conversion rates and cost of care

Acute treatment of atrial fibrillation is costly although spontaneous conversion rates are high. We reviewed 114 patients admitted to our inpatient service via the emergency department with a principal diagnosis of atrial fibrillation and found the spontaneous conversion rate was 50% in 48 hours, the average length of stay was 3.9 +/- 5.2 days, and the average cost was $6,692 +/- $4,928.

Atrial thrombi resolution after prolonged anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in nonanticoagulated patients may be associated with clinical thromboembolism. Prolonged anticoagulation with warfarin before cardioversion of atrial fibrillation produces a marked reduction of cardioversion-related thromboembolism. The benefit of anticoagulant therapy is generally believed to be due to atrial thrombi organization.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is highly accurate for diagnosis of atrial thrombi and gives the possibility to serially evaluate the effects of anticoagulant therapy. One hundred twenty-three patients with atrial fibrillation lasting longer than 2 days underwent TEE before cardioversion. An atrial thrombus was identified in 11 patients (9%), and was always confined to the left atrial appendage. TEE was repeated after a median of 4 weeks of oral warfarin. Atrial thrombus had completely resolved in 9 of 11 patients (81.8%; 95% CI, 48.2 to 97.7%); in two patients, clot was still present. No patient had clinical thromboembolism between the two TEE studies.

CONCLUSIONS

In the population of our study, a prolonged course of warfarin therapy was associated with resolution of atrial thrombi in the majority of patients. According to these data, the mechanism of thromboembolism reduction with 4 weeks of anticoagulation before cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation seems to be related mainly to thrombus lysis rather than organization. Due to the possibility of thrombus persistence even after prolonged anticoagulation, follow-up with TEE before cardioversion is necessary to document thrombus resolution.

Timing of thromboembolic events after electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation or flutter: a retrospective analysis

Pooled data from 32 studies were reviewed to assess the timing of thrombolic complications after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation or flutter. We found that 98% of embolic episodes occurred within 10 days of cardioversion.

Acute changes in spontaneous echo contrast and atrial function after cardioversion of persistent atrial flutter

With use of transesophageal echocardiography, the short-term effects of transthoracic electrical cardioversion of atrial flutter (AFI) on atrial mechanical function and spontaneous echo contrast were determined. Thirty patients who had AFI for a mean of 6.4 +/- 12.2 months underwent transthoracic cardioversion. A transesophageal echocardiogram was recorded immediately before cardioversion, and left atrial appendage emptying velocity and spontaneous contrast were assessed serially at 1, 3, and 5 minutes after cardioversion in 28 patients, and also at 8, 10, and 15 minutes after cardioversion in a subgroup of 13 patients. Cardioversion was deferred in 2 patients (7%) because a thrombus was found in the left atrial appendage. Before cardioversion, spontaneous contrast was present in the left atrium in 7 of 28 patients (25%) who underwent cardioversion. The mean left atrial appendage emptying velocity of 54 +/- 22 cm/s before cardioversion fell by 26% to 40 +/- 25 cm/s at 1 minute after restoration of sinus rhythm (p <0.01). There were no significant changes in the mean left atrial appendage-emptying velocity between 1 and 15 minutes after cardioversion. Within 5 minutes after conversion to sinus rhythm, left atrial spontaneous echo contrast developed de novo or worsened in 12 of the 28 patients (43%). In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate that persistent AFI may be associated with left atrial thrombi before cardioversion and that cardioversion of AFI is associated with a significant degree of atrial stunning and formation of spontaneous echo contrast.

Perspectives and controversies in atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia in humans. The 3 basic tenets of therapy are (1) restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm; (2) ventricular rate control; and (3) prevention of thromboembolism. Maintenance of sinus rhythm appears preferable to rate control alone in patients with significant symptoms caused by AF. Complete suppression of AF with drug therapy for >6 months is unusual, but it is not the sole criterion of success. As with other chronic cardiac disorders such as angina and heart failure, a marked reduction in frequency and duration of episodes of AF will likely translate into an excellent clinical outcome. The major risk of antiarrhythmic drug therapy is ventricular proarrhythmia, which is seen most frequently in patients with substantial left ventricular dysfunction. Torsade de pointes is the most frequent proarrhythmia that occurs with antiarrhythmic agents that prolong ventricular repolarization and the QT interval. To minimize the risk of proarrhythmia, antiarrhythmic drugs are started in-hospital in patients with significant heart disease, and agents are selected based on certain patient characteristics. For example, the drugs initially selected for patients with heart failure and coronary artery disease are amiodarone and sotalol, respectively. Two approaches may be used to decrease the thromboembolic risk associated with cardioversion of AF to sinus rhythm. In the conventional method, warfarin is given (INR 2.0-3.0) for 3 weeks before and at least 4 weeks after cardioversion. An alternative approach employs transesophageal echocardiography to rule out left atrial thrombi before cardioversion. Both methods appear reasonable and safe, and I prefer the conventional and transesophageal echocardiography-guided approaches for outpatients and in-hospital patients, respectively.

Role of echocardiography in patients undergoing elective cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

Echocardiography has emerged as a fundamental tool in the evaluation of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Transthoracic echocardiography remains a primary tool for the evaluation and management of many patients presenting with their first episode of AF, but it is not adequate for exclusion of atrial thrombi. TEE offers excellent visualization of the atria and accurate identification or exclusion of thrombi. In concert with therapeutic anticoagulation, a TEE-guided approach to early cardioversion appears to have a safety profile similar to that of conventional therapy (1 month of precardioversion warfarin). The TEE-guided approach offers the advantages of simplified anticoagulation management and shorter duration of sustained AF, thereby allowing for a more rapid recovery of atrial mechanical function. Warfarin should be continued for 1 month after cardioversion to allow for more complete recovery of atrial function and for prophylaxis should the patient revert to AF. Cost-effectiveness models demonstrate that TEE-guided cardioversion represents a cost-effective strategy, but only if the transthoracic echocardiogram is omitted. For patients with a thrombus on the initial TEE, follow-up TEE (to document thrombus resolution) is recommended before cardioversion.

Evaluation and management of atrial fibrillation in the emergency department

AF is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia. Recognition and appropriate management of AF is important to optimize care of concurrent medical problems and prevent long-term consequences. DC cardioversion under sedation should be performed in patients with pulmonary edema, angina, or hypotension. Ventricular rate control is the first choice in stable patients with rapid ventricular rate. Anticoagulation should be considered in all patients with AF duration < 48 hours, except for those under 65 years old and having no other risk factors of stroke. Recent data imply that early attempts at cardioversion may increase success rates and decrease AF recurrence rates. Thus, transesophageal echocardiogram-guided early cardioversion may become more widely used.

Likelihood of spontaneous conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the likelihood and predictors of spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm of recent-onset atrial fibrillation (symptoms <72 h).

BACKGROUND

Although spontaneous conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation is common, the likelihood and clinical and echocardiographic predictors have not been fully defined. Such data would be important for management of patients in whom early cardioversion is desired: Cardioversion could be delayed in patients with a high likelihood of spontaneous conversion, and it could be expeditiously pursued if spontaneous conversion is unlikely.

METHODS

We screened 1,822 consecutive adults admitted to the hospital with atrial fibrillation and prospectively identified 356 patients (45% male, mean age +/- SD 68 +/- 16 years) with atrial fibrillation of <72-h duration. The occurrence of spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm and clinical and echocardiographic data were identified through retrospective chart review.

RESULTS

Spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm occurred in 68% of the study group (n = 242; 95% confidence interval [CI] 63% to 73%). Among patients with spontaneous conversion, the total duration of atrial fibrillation was <24 h in 159 (66%), 24 to 48 h in 42 (17%) and >48 h in 41 (17%) (p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis of clinical data identified presentation <24 h from onset of symptoms as the only predictor of spontaneous conversion (odds ratio 1.8, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.4, p < 0.0001). Normal left ventricular systolic function was more common among patients with spontaneous conversion (p = 0.03), but it was not an independent predictor of conversion. Left atrial dimension was similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm occurs in almost 70% of patients presenting with atrial fibrillation of <72-h duration. Presentation with symptoms of <24-h duration is the best predictor of spontaneous conversion.

Treatment strategies for atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia observed in clinical practice, occurring in 0.4% of the general population and in up to 4% of people greater than 60 years old. It is often associated with other cardiovascular disorders, such as hypertension, coronary artery disease, or cardiomyopathy. Critical evaluation and management of patients with atrial fibrillation requires knowledge of etiology, prognosis, and treatment options of this arrhythmia. On initial presentation, emergency electrical cardioversion should be performed if the patient is hemodynamically unstable. If the patient is stable, initial rate control is recommended, using atrioventricular nodal blocking agents. Further treatment mainly depends upon the duration of the episode. Patients who are in atrial fibrillation <48 hours can be safely cardioverted. Patients who are in atrial fibrillation for >48 hours are commonly anticoagulated for 3 to 4 weeks before and after cardioversion because of the risk of thromboembolism formation in the left atrial appendage. An alternate strategy, which is especially attractive when immediate cardioversion is desired, is transesophageal echocardiography to exclude left atrial thrombus followed by prompt cardioversion. After cardioversion, sinus rhythm can be maintained with class I and III drugs, such as flecainide and propafenone or amiodarone and sotalol. New treatment options, such as atrial defibrillation, atrioventricular junctional ablation, or modification of atrial pacing to prevent atrial fibrillation, are currently under investigation. Although atrial fibrillation is so common in clinical practice, it still remains difficult to treat. Conversion and maintenance to sinus rhythm with antiarrhythmic drug therapy has not shown any improvement in mortality, and some patients may benefit more from ventricular rate control. This review article discusses different treatment strategies for patients with atrial fibrillation.

Recognition and Management of Cardiac Arrhythmias: Part I. General Principles and Supraventricular Tachyarrhythmias

Management of cardiac arrhythmias has undergone major changes in the last few years. In the first part of this review, general principles of arrhythmia diagnosis are discussed. New techniques such as event recording and signal-averaged electrocardiography have a significant role in the clinical management of arrhythmias. Many new antiarrhythmic drugs are now available. Suppression of premature ventricular contractions to prevent malignant ventricular arrhythmias has been demonstrated to be an ineffective strategy. Implantable defibrillators and radio frequency ablation have revolutionized the treatment of arrhythmias. Differentiation of various supraventricular tachycardias has become very important since some these arrhythmias may be cured by radiofrequency ablation. Diagnosis and treatment of common supraventricular arrhythmias are discussed.

The medical management of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is an extremely common arrhythmia that is associated with significant sequelae. Certain aspects of therapy, such as anticoagulation, are studied in well-constructed randomized trials. Other therapy, such as the maintenance of sinus rhythm with antiarrhythmic agents, is supported by limited evidence. This article reviews the epidemiology and medical treatment of this arrhythmia, addressing anticoagulation, ventricular rate control, and restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm. Randomized trials in progress that attempt to answer important questions in the management of atrial fibrillation are also discussed.

Role of transesophageal echocardiography in the management of thromboembolic stroke

Cardiac causes of stroke account for approximately 20% of strokes occurring in the United States. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) remains the cornerstone of non-invasive cardiac imaging, but transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is superior for identifying potential cardiac sources of emboli, including left atrial thrombi, valvular vegetations, thoracic aortic plaque, patent foramen ovale, and spontaneous left atrial echocardiographic contrast. The diagnostic yield of TEE for potential cardiac causes of thromboembolism exceeds 50%. The impact of TEE on the clinical management of this group, however, remains undefined for most TEE-specific diagnoses. Thus, routine use of TEE in these patients has been questioned. The diagnostic yield is highest if the clinical history/physical examination suggests a cardiac source. However, the clinical scenario often dictates patient management, and TEE data are used to "validate" the clinical impression. Data from large, prospective, randomized (aspirin/warfarin) studies, in which TEE data are obtained from patients with suspected cardiac thromboembolism, are needed. If specific TEE diagnoses can be identified in which defined therapies are beneficial, "source of embolism" will continue to be the most common indication for TEE referral. In this paradigm, TEE (without initial TTE) will probably become a more direct diagnostic pathway. However, if these studies demonstrate that all patients with suspected cardiac source benefit from one (or no) therapy, independent of TEE data, referrals for TEE will decline. Results of ongoing randomized trials to evaluate the efficacy of TEE in patients with cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack are awaited.

Left atrial appendage "stunning" after electrical cardioversion of atrial flutter: an attenuated response compared with atrial fibrillation as the mechanism for lower susceptibility to thromboembolic events

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine whether left atrial appendage stunning occurs in patients with atrial flutter and to compare left atrial appendage function in the pericardioversion period with that in patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage stunning has recently been proposed as a key mechanistic phenomenon in the etiology of postcardioversion thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation. Atrial flutter is thought to be associated with a negligible risk of thromboembolic events; therefore, anticoagulation is commonly withheld before and after cardioversion in these patients.

METHODS

Sixty-three patients with atrial flutter (n = 19) or atrial fibrillation (n = 44) underwent transesophageal echocardiography immediately before and after electrical cardioversion. In addition to assessing the presence of thrombus and spontaneous echo contrast, we measured left atrial appendage emptying velocity and calculated shear rates by pulsed wave Doppler and two-dimensional echocardiography.

RESULTS

Patients with atrial flutter exhibited greater left atrial appendage flow velocities before cardioversion than those with atrial fibrillation (42 +/- 19 vs. 28 +/- 15 cm/s [mean +/- SD], p < 0.001). Left atrial appendage shear rates were also higher in patients with atrial flutter (103 +/- 82 vs. 59 +/- 37 s-1, p < 0.001). After cardioversion, left atrial appendage flow velocities decreased compared with precardioversion values in patients with atrial fibrillation (28 +/- 15 before to 15 +/- 14 cm/s after cardioversion, p < 0.001) and atrial flutter (42 +/- 19 to 27 +/- 18 cm/s, respectively, p < 0.001). Shear rates decreased from 59 +/- 37 before cardioversion to 30 +/- 31 s-1 after cardioversion in atrial fibrillation (p < 0.001), and from 103 +/- 82 s to 65 +/- 52 s-1, respectively (p < 0.001), in atrial flutter. This decrease in flow velocity from before to after cardioversion occurred in 36 (82%) of 44 patients with atrial fibrillation and 14 (74%) of 19 with atrial flutter. The impaired left atrial appendage function after cardioversion was less pronounced in the group with atrial flutter (27 +/- 18 cm/s for atrial flutter vs. 15 +/- 14 cm/s for atrial fibrillation, p < 0.001). New or increased spontaneous echo contrast occurred in 22 (50%) of 44 patients with atrial fibrillation versus 4 (21%) of 19 with atrial flutter (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Left atrial appendage stunning also occurs in patients with atrial flutter, although to a lesser degree than in those with atrial fibrillation. These data suggest that patients with atrial flutter are at risk for thromboembolic events after cardioversion, although this risk is most likely lower than that in patients with atrial fibrillation because of better preserved left atrial appendage function.