Chronic atrophic gastritis: Natural history, diagnosis and therapeutic management. A position paper by the Italian Society of Hospital Gastroenterologists and Digestive Endoscopists [AIGO], the Italian Society of Digestive Endoscopy [SIED], the Italian Society of Gastroenterology [SIGE], and the Italian Society of Internal Medicine [SIMI]

Chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) is an underdiagnosed condition characterised by translational features going beyond the strict field of gastroenterology as it may manifest itself by a variable spectrum of gastric and extra-gastric symptoms and signs. It is relatively common among older adults in different parts of the world, but large variations exist. Helicobacter pylori-related CAG [multifocal] and autoimmune CAG (corpus-restricted) are apparently two different diseases, but they display overlapping features. Patients with cobalamin and/or iron deficiency anaemia or autoimmune disorders, including autoimmune thyroiditis and type 1 diabetes mellitus, should be offered screening for CAG. Pepsinogens, gastrin-17, and anti-H. pylori antibodies serum assays seem to be reliable non-invasive screening tools for the presence of CAG, helpful to identify individuals to refer to gastroscopy with five standard gastric biopsies in order to obtain histological confirmation of diagnosis. Patients with CAG are at increased risk of developing gastric cancer, and they should be estimated with histological staging systems (OLGA or OLGIM). H. pylori eradication may be beneficial by modifying the natural history of atrophy, but not that of intestinal metaplasia. Patients with advanced stages of CAG (Stage III/IV OLGA or OLGIM) should undergo endoscopic surveillance every three years, those with autoimmune CAG every three-five years. In patients with CAG, a screening for autoimmune thyroid disease and micronutrient deficiencies, including iron and vitamin B12, should be performed. The optimal treatment for dyspeptic symptoms in patients with CAG remains to be defined. Proton pump inhibitors are not indicated in hypochlorhydric CAG patients.

Reliability and accuracy of blue light imaging for staging of intestinal metaplasia in the stomach

Background and aims: An endoscopic grading system (EGGIM) using narrow-band-imaging (NBI) has shown to accurately identify patients with extensive gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM). However, description with alternative systems such as blue-light-imaging (BLI) is limited. The aim of this study is to determine the reliability and accuracy of BLI-bright regarding diagnosis and staging of GIM.Methods: Reliability of WLE (white-light-endoscopy) and BLI among 6 observers was assessed using a standard classification based on endoscopic images. Afterward, 37 patients were submitted to gastroscopy using FujifilmEG-760Z and endoscopists had to determine EGGIM score using BLI-bright and to perform gastric biopsies for operative-link-of-gastric-intestinal-metaplasia (OLGIM) calculation. BLI-bright accuracy was determined by comparing results with prior EGGIM scores with NBI and current OLGIM.Results: Compared with WLE, the interobserver reliability between observers was substantially better with BLI (Weighted Kappa: 0.8 vs 0.41). There was an 84% agreement between BLI and NBI assessing EGGIM intervals (EGGIM 0-4vs5-10). The area under the ROC curve was 0.90 (95%CI: 0.79-1.0) using the cut-off of EGGIM > 4 to determine advanced GIM, with a sensitivity of 100% (95%CI: 88-100%).Discussion: BLI-bright is reliable for the diagnosis of gastric intestinal metaplasia and agrees significantly with NBI evaluation. Preliminary data suggests high sensitivity for identifying patients with increased risk of gastric cancer.

Accuracy of endoscopic staging and targeted biopsies for routine gastric intestinal metaplasia and gastric atrophy evaluation study protocol of a prospective, cohort study: the estimate study

INTRODUCTION

Patients with chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) and intestinal metaplasia (IM) are at risk of developing gastric adenocarcinoma. Their diagnosis and management currently rely on histopathological guidance after random endoscopic biopsy sampling (Sydney biopsy strategy). This approach has significant flaws such as under-diagnosis, poor reproducibility and poor correlation between endoscopy and histology. This prospective, international multicentre study aims to establish whether endoscopy-led risk stratification accurately and reproducibly predicts CAG and IM extent and disease stage.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Patients with CAG and/or IM on standard white light endoscopy (WLE) will be prospectively identified and invited to undergo a second endoscopy performed by an expert endoscopist using enhanced endoscopic imaging techniques with virtual chromoendoscopy. Extent of CAG/IM will be endoscopically staged with enhanced imaging and compared with standard WLE. Histopathological risk stratification through targeted biopsies will be compared with endoscopic disease staging and to random biopsy staging on WLE as a reference. At least 234 patients are required to show a 10 % difference in sensitivity and accuracy between enhanced imaging endoscopy-led staging and the current biopsy-led staging protocol of gastric atrophy with a power (beta) of 80 % and a 0.05 probability of a type I error (alpha).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by the respective Institutional Review Boards (Netherlands: MEC-2018-078; UK: 19/LO/0089). The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific meetings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NTR7661; Pre-results.

Identifying high-risk individuals for gastric cancer surveillance from western and eastern perspectives: Lessons to learn and possibility to develop an integrated approach for daily practice

Current evidence shows that individuals with gastric dysplasia, severe and extensive gastric atrophy, extensive gastric intestinal metaplasia and the incomplete subtype of intestinal metaplasia are at high risk for gastric cancer (GC) development. There are several approaches to identifying these subjects, including noninvasive methods, esophagogastroduodenoscopy and histology. The main approach in Western countries is histology-based while that in Eastern countries with a high prevalence of GC is endoscopy-based. Regarding asymptomatic individuals, the key issues in selecting applicable approaches are the ability to reduce GC mortality and the cost-effectiveness of the approach. At present, population-based screening programs have only been applied in a few Asian countries with a high risk of GC. Pre-endoscopic risk assessment based on demographic and clinical features, such as ethnicity, age, gender, smoking and Helicobacter pylori status, is helpful for identifying subjects with high pre-test probability for a possibly cost-effective approach, especially in intermediate- and low-risk countries. Regarding symptomatic patients with indications for esophagogastroduodenoscopy, the importance of opportunistic screening should be emphasized. The combination of endoscopic and histological approaches should always be considered as endoscopy provides a real-time assessment of the patient's risk level. In addition, imaging enhanced endoscopy (IEE) has been shown to facilitate targeted biopsies resulting in better correlation between endoscopic and histological findings. Currently, the use of IEE is recommended for endoscopic examinations, and the Operative Link for Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia or Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment grading systems are recommended for histological examinations whenever available. However, resource limitations are an important barrier in many regions worldwide. Thus, for an approach to be applicable in real-life practice, it should be not only evidence-based but also resource-sensitive. In this review, we discuss the current understanding and approaches to identifying high-risk individuals from western and eastern perspectives, as well as the possibility of an integrated, resource-sensitive approach.

A single vial is enough in the absence of endoscopic suspected intestinal metaplasia - less is more!

Background: For the correct staging of chronic atrophic gastritis (AG) and gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) at least 4 biopsies are recommended: 2 from the antrum/incisura and 2 from the body sent in two different vials. As virtual chromoendoscopy with narrow-band-imaging (NBI) is valid both in the diagnosis and staging of GIM, it is reasonable to question the need to separate biopsy samples in all procedures. Aims: To evaluate if biopsy samples can be placed in the same vial without implications in the diagnosis and follow-up of the patient, if during gastroscopy no typical endoscopic pattern of GIM with NBI is observed. Methods: Multicentre prospective study of a consecutive sample of patients (n = 183) submitted to gastroscopy using NBI with no superficial neoplastic lesions and no suggestive areas of GIM. Biopsies of both antrum/incisure and body were performed in all patients and samples were placed in the same vial for histologic assessment [according to OLGA (operative link for gastritis assessment) and OLGIM (operative link for gastric intestinal metaplasia)], blinded to endoscopic features. Results: In all patients, OLGA and OLGIM calculation was possible as the pathologists could distinguish biopsy samples from antrum/incisure from those of gastric body. The negative predictive value was 100% for advanced stages of GIM or AG as 179 (98%) patients presented OLGIM 0 and only 4 (2%) presented OLGIM I. Regarding AG, 150 (82%) presented OLGA 0, 23 (13%) OLGA I and 10 (6%) OLGA II. Conclusion: In the absence of a typical endoscopic pattern of GIM using NBI, it is effective to place biopsies' specimens in the same vial (for Helicobacter pylori diagnosis) or even to abstain from biopsies as no single patient with significant changes seems to be missed. This change in clinical practice can have a significant impact on endoscopy costs.