Association of public reporting for percutaneous coronary intervention with utilization and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries with acute myocardial infarction

The status of public reporting of clinical outcomes in assisted reproductive technology

OBJECTIVE

To assess the transparency of assisted reproductive technology (ART) surveillance reports published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and by the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies (SART).

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

SETTING

Private clinical ART and research center.

PATIENT(S)

We analyzed ART data for the years 2005-2010, which were reported under federal mandate to the CDC (818,927 completed cycles) and voluntarily to SART (812,400 initiated cycles).

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Initiated cycles excluded from final outcome reporting were used to evaluate transparency.

RESULT(S)

Only SART, but not CDC, reported initiated cycles, allowing analysis of excluded cycles. Excluded cycles increased significantly from 3.3% to 7.4% between 2005 and 2010. By 2010, 13/341 (3.8%) ART centers accounted for 50% of excluded cycles, representing an average of 37.3% of their cycles. These 13 clinics reported significantly better pregnancy and cancellations rates than national averages and collectively increased by 19.9% their share of U.S. ART cycles.

CONCLUSION(S)

Our data indicate decreasing transparency in public ART reporting in the United States, likely due to changes in practice and reporting patterns. A few clinics accounted for the majority of excluded cycles, leading to improved reported clinical outcomes and increasing market share. CDC and SART should ensure that all ART clinics publicly report the outcomes of all initiated cycles including embryo-banking cycles. ART surveillance and quality of care may be improved by prospectively tracking the total reproductive potential of each initiated cycle.

Comparison of clinical characteristics and outcomes of cardiac arrest survivors having versus not having coronary angiography

Prompt percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with improved survival in patients presenting with cardiac arrest. Few studies, however, have focused on patients with cardiac arrest not selected for coronary angiography. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with cardiac arrest denied emergent angiography. Patients with cardiac arrest were identified within a registry that included all catheterization laboratory activations from 2008 to 2012. Logistic regression and proportional-hazards models were created to assess the clinical characteristics and mortality associated with denying emergent angiography. Among 664 patients referred for catheterization, 110 (17%) had cardiac arrest, and 26 of these patients did not undergo emergent angiography. Most subjects (69%) were turned down for angiography for clinical reasons and a minority for perceived futility (27%). After multivariate adjustment, pulseless electrical activity as the initial arrest rhythm (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 13.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.76 to 100.12), <1.0 mm of ST-segment elevation (AOR 10.26, 95% CI 1.68 to 62.73), female gender (AOR 4.45, 95% CI 1.04 to 19.08), and advancing age (AOR 1.10 per year, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.16) were associated with increased odds of withholding angiography. The mortality rate was markedly higher for patients who were denied emergent angiography (hazard ratio 3.64, 95% CI 2.05 to 6.49), even after adjustment for medical acuity (hazard ratio 2.29, 95% CI 1.19 to 4.41). In conclusion, older subjects, women, and patients without ST-segment elevation were more commonly denied emergent angiography after cardiac arrest. Patients denied emergent angiography had increased mortality that persisted after adjustment for illness severity.

US health care policy and reform: implications for cardiac electrophysiology

In response to unsustainably rising costs, variable quality and access to health care, and the projected insolvency of vital safety net insurance programs, the federal government has proposed important health policy and regulatory changes in the USA. The US Supreme Court's decision to uphold most of the major provisions of the Affordable Care Act will lead to some of the most sweeping government reforms on entitlements since the creation of Medicare. Furthermore, implementation of new organizational, reimbursement, and health care delivery models will strongly affect the practice of cardiac electrophysiology. In this brief review, we will provide background and context to the problem of rising health care costs and describe salient reforms and their projected impacts on the field and practice of cardiac electrophysiology.