Spatial, temporal and wavefront direction characteristics of 12-lead T-wave morphology

Dispersion of QT intervals: a measure of dispersion of repolarization or simply a projection effect?

QT interval dispersion may provide little information about repolarization dispersion. Some clinical measurements demonstrate an association between high QT interval dispersion and high morbidity and mortality, but what is being measured is not clear. This study was designed to help resolve this dilemma. We compared the association between different clinical measures of QT interval dispersion and the ECG lead amplitudes derived from a heart vector model of repolarization with no repolarization dispersion whatsoever. We compared our clinical QT interval dispersion data obtained from 25 subjects without cardiac disease with similar data from published studies, and correlated these QT dispersion results with the distribution of lead amplitudes derived from the projection of the heart vector onto the body surface during repolarization. Published results were available for mean relative QT intervals and mean differences from the maximum QT interval. The leads were derived from Uijen and Dower lead vector data. Using the Uijen lead vector data, the correlation between measurements of dispersion and derived lead amplitudes ranged from 0.78 to 0.99 for limb leads, and using the Dower values ranged from 0.81 to 0.94 for the precordial leads. These results show a clear association between the measured QT interval dispersion and the variation in ECG lead amplitudes derived from a simple heart vector model of repolarization with no regional information. Therefore, measured QT dispersion is related mostly to a projection effect and is not a true measure of repolarization dispersion. Our existing interpretation of QT dispersion must be reexamined, and other measurements that provide true repolarization dispersion data investigated.

QT dispersion does not represent electrocardiographic interlead heterogeneity of ventricular repolarization

INTRODUCTION

QT dispersion (QTd, range of QT intervals in 12 ECG leads) is thought to reflect spatial heterogeneity of ventricular refractoriness. However, QTd may be largely due to projections of the repolarization dipole rather than "nondipolar" signals.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Seventy-eight normal subjects (47+/-16 years, 23 women), 68 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients (HCM; 38+/-15 years, 21 women), 72 dilated cardiomyopathy patients (DCM; 48+/-15 years, 29 women), and 81 survivors of acute myocardial infarction (AMI; 63+/-12 years, 20 women) had digital 12-lead resting supine ECGs recorded (10 ECGs recorded in each subject and results averaged). In each ECG lead, QT interval was measured under operator review by QT Guard (GE Marquette) to obtain QTd. QTd was expressed as the range, standard deviation, and highest-to-lowest quartile difference of QT interval in all measurable leads. Singular value decomposition transferred ECGs into a minimum dimensional time orthogonal space. The first three components represented the ECG dipole; other components represented nondipolar signals. The power of the T wave nondipolar within the total components was computed to measure spatial repolarization heterogeneity (relative T wave residuum, TWR). QTd was 33.6+/-18.3, 47.0+/-19.3, 34.8+/-21.2, and 57.5+/-25.3 msec in normals, HCM, DCM, and AMI, respectively (normals vs DCM: NS, other P < 0.009). TWR was 0.029%+/-0.031%, 0.067%+/-0.067%, 0.112%+/-0.154%, and 0.186%+/-0.308% in normals, HCM, DCM, and AMI (HCM vs DCM: NS, other P < 0.006). The correlations between QTd and TWR were r = -0.0446, 0.2805, -0.1531, and 0.0771 (P = 0.03 for HCM, other NS) in normals, HCM, DCM, and AMI, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Spatial heterogeneity of ventricular repolarization exists and is measurable in 12-lead resting ECGs. It differs between different clinical groups, but the so-called QT dispersion is unrelated to it.

Measurement and interpretation of QT dispersion

QT dispersion was proposed as an index of the spatial inhomogeneity of ventricular recovery times. The results of studies that found significant correlation between dispersion of ventricular recovery times measured with monophasic action potentials and QT dispersion were interpreted as proof of the direct link between QT dispersion and the dispersion of ventricular recovery times. Later it was shown that QT dispersion is not a direct reflection of the spatial variation of the recovery times and cannot be used for quantification of this variation. The interlead variability of the QT intervals is a result of different projections of the spatial T-wave loop into the various electrocardiographic leads. The reliability of both manual and automatic measurement of QT dispersion is low and is often of the order of the differences of Qt dispersion between different patient groups. The measurement reliability is influenced by intrinsic factors (e.g., amplitude of the T wave) and extrinsic factors (e.g., noise, paper speed of recording, instruments for manual measurements, and type of algorithm and interalgorithmic settings for automatic measurement). There is very little to choose between the different indices of expression of QT dispersion, as well as between the different lead configurations used for its measurement. QT dispersion is not simply a result of measurement error, but a crude measure of abnormalities during the whole course of repolarization. Only grossly prolonged QT dispersion (e.g., > or =100 ms), must be interpreted simply as a sign of the abnormal course of the repolarization, and inferences about the actual dispersion of the ventricular recovery times should not be made. Newer concepts of assessment of the morphology of the T wave are already emerging and will probably be of higher clinical value.

Electrophysiological basis of QT dispersion measurements

Dispersion of ventricular repolarization is a now widely used term describing nonhomogeneous recovery of excitability or heterogeneity of ventricular repolarization. It is usually expressed as the difference or the range of various repolarization measurements obtained from a heart. Experimentally, an increased dispersion of ventricular repolarization was found to be tightly associated with increased propensity for ventricular arrhythmias, and, therefore, is considered an important arrhythmogenic mechanism. Noninvasively, this arrhythmogenic substrate was approached using multilead body surface potential mapping, but also QT interval dispersion (QTd) and similar electrocardiogram (ECG) variables from the 12-lead surface ECG. Standard QTd from the ECG correlates significantly with dispersion of repolarization measured from the myocardium. A causal relationship is, however, still unclear, and there are 2 main hypotheses to explain the electrophysiological basis of QTd. The local hypothesis explaining QTd with spatial differences in action potential duration mirrored in the various QT intervals competes with the global hypothesis explaining the variation in surface ECG measurements with different projections of a common T-wave vector. Notwithstanding the final explanation for QTd, and particularly for technical reasons, new markers like advanced T-wave loop variables may best reflect the abnormal repolarization substrate on the surface ECG.