Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris

Assessment of patients after coronary artery bypass grafting using 64-slice computed tomography

The aim was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography (CT) for the identification of obstructive disease in both bypass grafts and native coronary vessels in symptomatic patients with a history of coronary artery bypass grafting. Eighty-nine symptomatic patients (81 men; mean age 64 +/- 8 years) were prospectively studied 8 +/- 4.5 years after bypass surgery. A total of 287 grafts (89 arterial grafts, 198 venous grafts) and 1,183 segments in 356 native coronary arteries >1.5 mm in diameter were evaluated using 64-slice computed tomographic angiography for the detection of significant stenosis, defined as >or=50% decrease in diameter of artery. Results were compared with quantitative coronary angiography as the standard of reference. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 64-slice CT for the detection of significant lesions in bypass grafts were 98%, 97%, 96%, and 99%, respectively. Segment-by-segment analysis of native coronary arteries and distal runoff vessels for the detection of significant obstructive disease yielded sensitivity of 93% with specificity of 88%. If analysis was restricted to nongrafted and distal runoff segments, sensitivity and specificity were 89% and 94%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice CT was significantly lower for the evaluation of severely calcified segments. In conclusion, 64-slice CT was a valuable and noninvasive tool for accurate comprehensive assessment of bypass grafts and native coronary circulation. However, its usefulness was limited in the presence of heavy calcium deposits.

Diagnostic accuracy of angiographic view image for the detection of coronary artery stenoses by 64-detector row CT: a pilot study comparison with conventional post-processing methods and axial images alone

BACKGROUND

The angiographic view (AGV) image is a new post-processing method that is similar to conventional coronary angiography (CAG). The purpose of this study was to evaluate its accuracy for coronary stenosis detection by 64-detector row computed tomography (CT).

METHODS AND RESULTS

CT evaluation results of 17 patients were compared with the results of invasive CAG on a coronary segment basis concerning the presence of stenoses>50% diameter reduction. All images of the 3 viewing methods (combination of conventional methods, AGV image alone, and axial images alone) were evaluated in consensus by 3 cardiovascular radiologists. Among 196 assessable segments, invasive CAG showed significant coronary artery stenoses in 44 segments. 43 of 44 lesions were detected with the AGV image, and absence of significant stenosis was correctly identified in 135 of 152 segments (sensitivity 98%; specificity 89%; accuracy 91%; positive predictive value 72%, negative predictive value 99%). The sensitivity of the AGV image was the same as that of conventional methods (98%). There was no significant difference in accuracy between the AGV image (91%) and conventional methods (94%). The accuracy of the AGV image was significantly higher than the axial images alone (78%).

CONCLUSIONS

AGV image shows promise as a post-processing method for identifying coronary artery stenosis with high accuracy.

Imaging of the heart with computed tomography

Imaging of the heart with computed tomography (CT) was already introduced in the 1980Is and has meanwhile entered clinical routine as a consequence of the rapid evolution of CT technology during the last decade. In this review article, we give an overview on the technology and clinical performance of different CT-scanner generations used for cardiac imaging, such as Electron Beam CT (EBCT), single-slice CT und multi-detector row CT (MDCT) with 4, 16 and 64 simultaneously acquired slices. We identify the limitations of current CT-scanners, indicate potential of improvement and discuss alternative system concepts such as CT with area detectors and dual source CT (DSCT).

Meta-analysis of 40- and 64-MDCT angiography for assessing coronary artery stenosis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to assess the diagnostic performance of thin-slice (< or = 0.625 mm) MDCT coronary angiography compared with invasive coronary angiography for the detection of significant (> or = 50%) stenosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-two articles on 40- and 64-MDCT coronary angiography were included. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated on a per-patient and per-segment basis; in addition, proximal versus distal segments were evaluated. The effect of nonevaluable patients, nonevaluable segments, and disease prevalence on diagnostic performance was assessed.

RESULTS

Pooled sensitivity on a patient level was 97.7% ([95% CI] 96.2-98.7%) and specificity 91.0% (88.5-93.1%). Pooled sensitivity on a segmental level was 90.8% (89.0-92.4%) and specificity 95.7% (95.2-96.1%); for proximal segments, respectively, 94.2% (92.3-95.7%) and 94.1% (93.4-94.8%), and for distal segments 84.8% (81.1-88.0%) and 96.9% (96.4-97.4%). If nonevaluable MDCT investigations were included, the per-patient specificity was reduced from 91.0% to 89.1% (p > 0.05) when allocating excluded patients as having significant coronary artery stenosis, and the sensitivity was reduced from 97.7% to 96.2% (p > 0.05) when allocating excluded patients as not having significant stenosis. The per-patient prevalence of coronary artery stenosis had no significant influence on the sensitivity for detecting significant stenosis.

CONCLUSION

Forty- and 64-MDCT provide good-to-excellent performance in detecting or ruling out significant coronary artery stenosis, with better results for proximal than for distal coronary artery segments.

Low-dose CT coronary angiography using prospective ECG-triggering: impact of mean heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of mean heart rate (HR) and HR variability on image quality in low-dose computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA) using prospective electrocardiographic (ECG) triggering.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred thirty-six consecutive patients were scheduled for low-dose CTCA using prospective ECG triggering. The image quality of all coronary segments was rated on a 5-point scale by two independent readers (scores of 1-3 were considered diagnostic, and scores of 4 and 5 were considered nondiagnostic). Intravenous beta blockers were administered targeting HR < 65 beats/min before scanning, but not if HR increased during scanning.

RESULTS

After the exclusion of seven patients because of arrhythmia (n = 4) or mean HRs > 65 beats/min despite using beta blockers (n = 3), 129 patients underwent computed tomographic scanning. The estimated mean effective radiation dose was 2.2 +/- 0.7 mSv (range, 1.1-3.5). The mean HR during scanning was 58.4 +/- 6.6 beats/min (range, 44.2-80.1), with a variability of 1.6 +/- 1.0 beats/min (range, 0.2-5.3). Mean HR (r = 0.49, P < .001) but not mean HR variability (r = 0.14) was related to image quality. Nondiagnostic image quality on CTCA was found in 5% of the coronary segments in 21 of 129 patients. However, on receiver-operating characteristic analysis, a cutoff HR of 62 beats/min was determined, below which nondiagnostic segments were significantly less frequent (2% vs 14%, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Prospective triggering allows low-dose CTCA but requires a low HR. Because a low HR offers a prolonged diastole, widening the optimal phase for scanning, HR variability seems to have a negligible impact on image quality.

Maximizing dose reductions with cardiac CT

Multidetector computed tomography has come a long way in a short time, quickly becoming a standard tool in the cardiac imaging armamentarium. The promise of plaque imaging, combined with both anatomical visualization and stenosis detection, has made this a preferred first line test of many cardiologists and radiologists. This test is well suited to rule out coronary artery disease (obstruction) and still diagnosing subclinical plaque, with may be a good target for anti-atherosclerotic therapies. There has been recent criticism against CT imaging, and cardiac CT specifically, due to the high radiation doses that being employed. New advances have allowed for dramatic dose reductions. These include more routinely performed methods such as dose modulation, and newer methods such as prospective gating or minimizing the field of view. This paper will review the different applications to reduce cardiac CT radiation doses to nominal levels, potentially expanding the applications of cardiac CT by removing one of the biggest barriers.

Radiation dose reduction and coronary assessability of prospective electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography coronary angiography: comparison with retrospective electrocardiogram-gated helical scan

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate radiation dose and coronary assessability of a prospective electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated scan by 64-slice multidetector (row) computed tomography (MDCT)-coronary angiography (CA) compared with a retrospective ECG-gated helical scan.

BACKGROUND

The 64-slice MDCT-CA has been widely used; however, a high radiation dose by 64-slice MDCT-CA has been reported. Prospective ECG-gated scan using "step-and-shoot" protocol can reduce radiation exposure effectively.

METHODS

MDCT-CA was performed in 229 consecutive patients. Fifty-six patients were excluded because of higher heart rates of >65 beats/min; of patients with heart rates <or=65 beats/min, 97 were analyzed by helical scan with tube current modulation and 76 were analyzed by prospective gating. Coronary assessability and diagnostic accuracy were investigated in comparison with selective CA as the gold standard. Radiation doses were evaluated in both protocols.

RESULTS

Coronary assessability of helical scan was 95.5% (1,303 of 1,364 segments), while that of prospective gating was 96.6% (1,053 of 1,089 segments), showing similar coronary assessability (p = 0.14). Sensitivity and specificity for coronary obstructive and occlusive lesions in the assessable segments were 97.0% (162 of 167) and 97.6% (1,109 of 1,136) by helical scan, while those of prospective gating were 96.4% (81 of 84, p = 0.84) and 98.5% (955 of 969, p = 0.12), respectively. Effective doses of helical scan and prospective gating were 21.1 +/- 6.7 mSv and 4.3 +/- 1.3 mSv, respectively (p < 0.0001), showing that prospective gating decreased radiation dose by 79% compared with that of helical scan.

CONCLUSIONS

MDCT-CA by prospective gating showed equivalent coronary assessability and diagnostic accuracy with decreased radiation dose in comparison with a retrospective ECG-gated helical scan with tube current modulation.

Coronary CT angiography using 64 detector rows: methods and design of the multi-centre trial CORE-64

Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenoses is a promising candidate for widespread clinical application because of its non-invasive nature and high sensitivity and negative predictive value as found in several previous studies using 16 to 64 simultaneous detector rows. A multi-centre study of CT coronary angiography using 16 simultaneous detector rows has shown that 16-slice CT is limited by a high number of nondiagnostic cases and a high false-positive rate. A recent meta-analysis indicated a significant interaction between the size of the study sample and the diagnostic odds ratios suggestive of small study bias, highlighting the importance of evaluating MSCT using 64 simultaneous detector rows in a multi-centre approach with a larger sample size. In this manuscript we detail the objectives and methods of the prospective "CORE-64" trial ("Coronary Evaluation Using Multidetector Spiral Computed Tomography Angiography using 64 Detectors"). This multi-centre trial was unique in that it assessed the diagnostic performance of 64-slice CT coronary angiography in nine centres worldwide in comparison to conventional coronary angiography. In conclusion, the multi-centre, multi-institutional and multi-continental trial CORE-64 has great potential to ultimately assess the per-patient diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography using 64 simultaneous detector rows.

Accuracy of low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography using prospective electrocardiogram-triggering: first clinical experience

AIMS

To evaluate the accuracy of low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) using prospective ECG-triggering for the assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 30 patients (19 males, 11 females, mean age 58.8 +/- 9.9 years) underwent low-dose CTCA and invasive coronary angiography (CA) [median 2 days (0, 41)]. Before CT scanning, intravenous beta-blocker was administered in 18 of 30 patients as heart rate (HR) was >65 b.p.m., achieving a mean HR of 55.7 +/- 7.9 b.p.m. CAD was defined as coronary artery narrowing > or =50%, using CA as standard of reference. The estimated mean effective radiation dose was 2.1 +/- 0.7 mSv (range: 1.0-3.3), yielding 96.0% (383/399) of evaluable segments. On an intention-to-diagnose-base, all non-evaluative segments were included in the analysis. Vessels with a non-evaluative segment and no further finding were censored as false positive. Patient-based analysis revealed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 100, 83.3, 90.0, and 100%, respectively. The respective values per vessel were 100, 88.9, 85.7, and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Prospective ECG-triggering allows low-dose CTCA and provides high diagnostic accuracy in the assessment of CAD in patients with stable sinus rhythm and a low heart rate.

Defining optimal research study design for cardiovascular imaging using computed tomography angiography as a model

Patients, physicians, and payers are facing a significant increase in cardiovascular (CV) imaging use, resulting in skyrocketing societal costs, without clear improvement in patient outcomes. The need for studies evaluating the effects of CV imaging that assess appropriate end points is critical to address continued concerns over the lack of well-designed clinical studies. Thus, the investigators propose a framework, using computed tomographic angiography as a model, that should be considered in the optimal design of future imaging research and would potentially provide payers with data to make appropriate reimbursement decisions. The inclusion of risk stratification, randomization, multiple-site participation, and multigeography site enrollment are key elements in the construction of such studies. Meaningful end points with regard to operating characteristics, downstream testing, CV event rates, outcomes, and costs are essential to appropriately evaluate any new imaging technology. Only once better level evidence is formed to support CV imaging can the central issues of quality and appropriateness of CV imaging truly be evaluated. If the CV community does not embrace this type of scientific evaluation of CV imaging modalities and fails to adequately identify the value in these techniques, it may ultimately lose the ability to use them to provide optimal care to its patients.

Quantification of coronary plaque by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparison with quantitative intracoronary ultrasound

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive assessment of coronary atherosclerotic plaque may be useful for risk stratification and treatment of atherosclerosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied 47 patients to investigate the accuracy of coronary plaque volume measurement acquired with 64-slice multislice computed tomography (MSCT), using newly developed quantification software, when compared with quantitative intracoronary ultrasound (QCU). Quantitative MSCT coronary angiography (QMSCT-CA) was performed to determine plaque volume for a matched region of interest (regional plaque burden) and in significant plaque defined as a plaque with > or =50% area obstruction in QCU, and compared with QCU. Dataset with image blurring and heavy calcification were excluded from analysis.

RESULTS

In 100 comparable regions of interest, regional plaque burden was highly correlated (coefficient r = 0.96; P < 0.001) between QCU and QMSCT-CA, but QMSCT-CA overestimated the plaque burden by a mean difference of 7 +/- 33 mm3 (P = 0.03). In 76 significant plaques detected within the regions of interest, plaque volume determined by QMSCT-CA was highly correlated (r = 0.98; P < 0.001) with a slight underestimation of 2 +/- 17 mm3 (P = not significant) when compared with QCU. Calcified and mixed plaque volume was slightly overestimated by 4 +/- 19 mm3 (P = ns) and noncalcified plaque volume was significantly underestimated by 9 +/- 11 mm3 (P < 0.001) with QMSCT-CA. Overall, the limits of agreement for plaque burden/volume measurement between QCU and QMSCT-CA were relatively large. Reproducibility for the measurements of regional plaque burden with QMSCT-CA was good, with a mean intraobserver and interobserver variability of 0% +/- 16% and 4% +/- 24%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantification of coronary plaque within selected proximal or middle coronary segments without image blurring and heavy calcification with 64-slice CT was moderately accurate with respect to intravascular ultrasound and demonstrated good reproducibility. Further improvement in CT resolution is required for more reliable measurement of coronary plaques using quantification software.

Evaluation of right ventricular function with multidetector computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and analysis of inter- and intraobserver variability

This study was performed to prospectively compare multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) with 16 simultaneous sections and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of global right ventricular function in 50 patients. MDCT using a semiautomatic analysis tool showed good correlation with MRI for end-diastolic volume (EDV, r=0.83, p<0.001), end-systolic volume (ESV, r=0.86, p<0.001) and stroke volume (SV, r=0.74, p<0.001), but only a moderate correlation for the ejection fraction (EF, r=0.67, p<0.001). Bland Altman analysis revealed a slight, but insignificant overestimation of EDV (4.0 ml, p=0.08) and ESV (2.4 ml, p=0.07), and underestimation of EF (0.1%, p=0.92) with MDCT compared with MRI. All limits of agreement between both modalities (EF: +/-15.7%, EDV: +/-31.0 ml, ESV: +/-18.0 ml) were in a moderate but acceptable range. Interobserver variability of MDCT was not significantly different from that of MRI. For MDCT software, the post-processing time was significantly longer (19.6+/-5.8 min) than for MRI (11.8+/-2.6 min, p<0.001). Accurate assessment of right ventricular volumes by 16-detector CT is feasible but still rather time-consuming.

Evaluation of a "triple rule-out" coronary CT angiography protocol: use of 64-Section CT in low-to-moderate risk emergency department patients suspected of having acute coronary syndrome

PURPOSE

To determine whether coronary computed tomographic (CT) angiography "triple rule-out" evaluation of emergency department (ED) patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) can help identify a subset of patients who can be discharged without adverse clinical outcomes within 30 days.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This protocol was approved by the university institutional review board. Each patient provided written informed consent prior to inclusion. Coronary CT angiography was performed in 201 consecutive low-to-moderate risk ACS patients. A triple rule-out protocol was used to evaluate for coronary disease, pulmonary embolism, aortic dissection, and other thoracic disease. Four patients were excluded because of technical problems. The remaining subjects underwent a 30-day follow-up.

RESULTS

A disease process other than coronary atherosclerosis that explained the presenting symptoms was diagnosed in 22 (11%) of 197 patients. Clinically important noncoronary diagnoses that did not explain patient symptoms were identified in 27 (14%) of 197 additional patients. With respect to coronary artery disease, 10 patients had severe disease (>70% stenosis), 12 had moderate disease (50%-70% stenosis), 46 had mild disease (up to 50% stenosis), and 129 had no disease. No further diagnostic testing was performed in 133 (76%) of 175 of patients with no to mild coronary disease. At 30-day follow-up, the negative predictive value of coronary CT angiography with no more than mild disease was 99.4%. There were no adverse outcomes at 30 days.

CONCLUSION

Triple rule-out coronary CT angiography evaluation of low-to-moderate risk ACS patients presenting to the ED provided a noncoronary diagnosis that explained the presenting complaint in 11% of patients, suggested the presence of significant moderate-to-severe coronary disease in 11% (22 of 197) of patients, and precluded additional diagnostic cardiac testing in the majority of patients with no adverse outcomes at 30-day follow-up.

Detection of occult coronary artery disease in asymptomatic individuals with diabetes mellitus using non-invasive cardiac angiography

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death for individuals with diabetes mellitus. Controversy exists regarding the screening of asymptomatic diabetics for occult coronary artery disease (CAD). The purpose of this study is to describe the prevalence of occult CAD in a group of asymptomatic subjects with diabetes using non-invasive coronary angiography, as well as to investigate the predictive accuracy of current guidelines with regards to their recommended criteria for further cardiac diagnostic testing in this patient population.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 217 asymptomatic Korean outpatients with type 2 diabetes who had no prior history of CAD. All underwent non-invasive coronary angiography using a 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography scanner.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study participants was 59+/-8 years; 66% were men. Diabetes duration was 7+/-7 years, mean Framingham risk score was 13%, and mean hemoglobin A1C level was 7%. Of the 217 outpatients, 138 (64%) had occult CAD based on cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) findings. Thirty-six (36/138; 26%) had a significant stenosis on CCTA. Nearly half of the individuals (62/138; 45%) had a combination of non-calcified and calcified plaques. Only 5 out of 217 (2%) individuals with significant stenosis would have been missed using the American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria for further cardiac testing.

CONCLUSION

Almost two thirds of asymptomatic diabetics have occult CAD, including obstructive disease. Based on CCTA findings, the ADA criteria for further cardiac diagnostic testing would identify most individuals who have a significant coronary stenosis.

Coronary stent assessment on multidetector computed tomography: Source and predictors of image distortion

BACKGROUND

Metallic stent struts cause imaging artifacts on multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) which interfere with the assessment of in-stent coronary restenosis. We examined the degree of image distortion of implanted coronary stents on MDCT, comparing different stent types, sizes and orientation.

METHODS

We quantified stent dimensions and image distortion of 151 non-opacified coronary stents in 89 patients (81% men, age 65+/-10 years) who underwent MDCT with a 40 slice MDCT scanner. Stent dimension by MDCT was compared with measurements obtained from quantitative coronary angiographic (QCA) in the immediate post-implantation angiogram and with manufacturers' data.

RESULTS

Stent image quality was good for 107 stents (71%), moderate for 38 (25%) and poor in 6 (4%), 2 (<1%) of which were not assessable. Blooming artifact resulted in a mean MDCT luminal (inner) diameter 30+/-14% smaller than QCA diameter (2.0+/-0.5 vs 2.9+/-0.3 mm, p<0.001) and a mean outer diameter exceeding QCA by 31+/-14% (3.8+/-0.5 vs 2.9+/-0.3 mm, p<0.001). MDCT luminal stent diameter was unrelated to strut thickness or the vessel stented but appeared to be smaller for vertically orientated stents (p=0.017), cobalt alloy (vs stainless steel) (p=0.011) and also for different stent types (p=0.006).

CONCLUSION

The luminal dimension of implanted coronary stents, as visualized with 40 slice MDCT, was one third smaller than on invasive angiography. This decrease in visualized stent luminal diameter forms the basis for the difficulty in accurate assessment of in-stent restenosis by MDCT.

64-slice CT for diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the accuracy of 64-slice CT coronary angiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

METHODS

We attempted to identify all published trials in all languages that used 64-slice CT to diagnose coronary artery disease. Results of 64-slice CT coronary angiography were compared with invasive coronary angiography or intravascular ultrasound.

RESULTS

Sensitivity of 64-slice CT for significant (> or =50%) stenosis, based on pooled data from all studies, was > or =90% in patient-based evaluations, named vessels, segments, and coronary artery bypass grafts, except the left circumflex (sensitivity 88%), distal segments (80%), and stents (88%). Specificity was 88% in patient-based evaluations, and > or =90% at individual sites. Positive predictive values for patient-based evaluations, left main coronary artery, and coronary artery bypass grafts ranged from 91% to 93%, but elsewhere ranged from 69% to 84%. Negative predictive values were 96% to 100%. Positive likelihood ratios for patient-based evaluations were 8.0 and, at specific sites, were > or =9.7. Negative likelihood ratios, except for distal segments, were <0.1.

CONCLUSION

Negative 64-slice CT reliably excluded significant coronary disease. However, the data suggest that stenoses shown on 64-slice CT require confirmation. Combining the results of 64-slice CT with a pre-CT clinical probability assessment would strengthen the diagnosis. Due to the risk of radiation-induced cancer, patients should be selected carefully for this test, and scan protocols should be optimized to minimize risk.

Direct comparison of whole-heart navigator-gated magnetic resonance coronary angiography and 40- and 64-slice multidetector row computed tomography to detect the coronary artery stenosis in patients scheduled for conventional coronary angiography

BACKGROUND

Both whole-heart magnetic resonance coronary angiography (WH-MRCA) and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) have been proposed for the noninvasive identification of the coronary stenosis. The authors sought to directly compare the diagnostic accuracy of these noninvasive imaging techniques using the invasive quantitative coronary angiography as a reference standard.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Seventy-seven consecutive patients (56 men, 61+/-14 years) prospectively underwent WH-MRCA and 40- or 64-slice MDCT before the quantitative coronary angiography. Diagnostic accuracy of WH-MRCA and MDCT for the visual identification of >50% diameter stenosis in segments of >1.5 mm size was compared using the quantitative coronary angiography as a reference. According to the quantitative coronary angiography, 49 of 992 coronary segments >1.5 mm diameter had >50% diameter stenosis. MDCT had a higher success rate (100% versus 88%, P<0.001) and enabled identification of more segments (963 versus 726, P<0.001) than did WH-MRCA. On a per-segment basis, WH-MRCA had similar sensitivity (47/49 or 96% versus 48/49 or 98%, P=0.9) but significantly lower specificity (644/943 or 68% versus 863/943 or 92%, P<0.001) and accuracy (691/992 or 70% versus 911/992 or 92%, P<0.001) for the detection of >50% diameter stenosis than did MDCT. On a per-patient basis, the sensitivity was similar (17/17 or 100% versus 16/17 or 94%, P=0.9), but specificity (43/60 or 72% versus 53/60 or 88%, P=0.024) and diagnostic accuracy (60/77 or 78%, versus 69/77 or 90%, P=0.044) of WH-MRCA for the detection of >50% diameter stenosis were significantly lower than of MDCT.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of the higher success rate and higher number of interpretable segments, 40- or 64-slice MDCT performs better than WH-MRCA.

Prevalence and characteristics of coronary artery disease in a population with suspected ischemic heart disease using CT coronary angiography: correlations with cardiovascular risk factors and clinical presentation

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to describe the correlation between the distribution of coronary artery disease (CAD) in a symptomatic population with suspected ischaemic heart disease, cardiovascular risk factors (RF) and clinical presentation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

we studied 163 patients (mean age 65.5 years; 101 men and 62 women) referred for multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography (MDCT-CA) to rule out CAD. The patients had no prior history of revascularisation or myocardial infarction. We analysed how the characteristics of CAD (severity and type of plaque) can change with the increase in RF and how they are related to different clinical presentations.

RESULTS

patients were divided into three groups according to the number of RF: zero or one, two or three, and four or more. The percentage of coronary arteries with no plaque, nonsignificant disease and significant disease was 55%, 41% and 4%, respectively, in patients with zero or one RF; 27%, 51% and 22%, respectively, in patients with two or three RF; and 19%, 38% and 44%, respectively, in patients with four or more RF. Plaque in patients with nonsignificant disease was mixed in 65%, soft in 18% and calcified in 17%. The percentage of coronaries with no plaque in the three RF groups was 50%, 20% and 0% in patients with typical chest pain and 46%, 24% and 12% in those with atypical pain. The percentage of significant disease in patients with typical pain was 0%, 47% and 86% and in those with atypical pain 4%, 20% and 29%.

CONCLUSIONS

MDCT plays an important role in the identification of CAD in patients with suspected ischaemic heart disease. Severity and type of disease is highly correlated with RF number and assumes different characteristics according to clinical presentation.

Sixty-four-slice computed tomography of the coronary arteries: cost-effectiveness analysis of patients presenting to the emergency department with low-risk chest pain

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to use a computer model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) of the coronary arteries in the emergency department (ED) compared to an observation unit (OU) stay plus stress electrocardiogram (ECG) or stress echocardiography for the evaluation of low-risk chest pain patients presenting to the ED.

METHODS

A decision analytic model was developed to compare health outcomes and costs that result from three different risk stratification strategies for low-risk chest pain patients in the ED: stress ECG testing after OU care, stress echocardiography after OU care, and MDCT with no OU care. Three patient populations were modeled with the prevalence of symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) being very low risk, 2%; low risk, 6% (base case); and moderate risk, 10%. Outcomes were measured as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), the ratio of change in costs of one test over another to the change in QALY, were calculated for comparisons between each strategy. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of the results to assumptions regarding the characteristics of the risk stratification strategies, costs, utility weights, and likelihood of events.

RESULTS

In the base case, the mean (+/- standard deviation [SD]) costs and QALYs for each risk stratification strategy were MDCT arm $2,684 (+/- $1,773 to $4,418) and 24.69 (+/- 24.54 to 24.76) QALYs, stress echocardiography arm $3,265 (+/- $2,383 to $4,836) and 24.63 (+/- 24.28 to 24.74) QALYs, and stress ECG arm $3,461 (+/- $2,533 to $4,996) and 24.59 (+/- 24.21 to 24.75) QALYs. The MDCT dominated (less costly and more effective) both OU plus stress echocardiography and OU plus stress ECG. This resulted in an ICER where the MDCT arm dominated the stress echocardiography arm (95% confidence interval [CI] = dominant to $29,738) and where MDCT dominated the ECG arm (95% CI = dominant to $7,332). The MDCT risk stratification arm also dominated stress echocardiography and stress ECG in the 2 and 10% prevalence scenarios, which demonstrated the same ICER trends as the 6% prevalence CAD base case. The thresholds where the MDCT arm remained a cost-saving strategy compared to the other risk stratification strategies were cost of MDCT, < $2,097; cost of OU care, > $1,092; prevalence of CAD, < 70%; MDCT specificity, > 65%; and a MDCT indeterminate rate, < 30%.

CONCLUSIONS

In this computer-based model analysis, the MDCT risk stratification strategy is less costly and more effective than both OU-based stress echocardiography and stress ECG risk stratification strategies in chest pain patients presenting to the ED with low to moderate prevalence of CAD.

Effect of decrease in heart rate variability on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-MDCT coronary angiography

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-MDCT in the assessment of coronary artery stenosis.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

CT and invasive coronary angiography were performed on 114 patients (mean age, 62 years) referred for known coronary artery disease (n = 26), atypical chest pain (n = 58), and presurgical exclusion of coronary artery disease before abdominal aortic (n = 14) or cardiac valve (n = 16) surgery. The population was divided into two groups depending on median average heart rate (60.0 beats/min) and median heart rate variability (2.7 beats/min) during scanning. Heart rate variability was calculated as SD from the mean heart rate. Two blinded observers using a 4-point scale independently assessed the quality of images of each coronary artery segment and classified each segment as being stenosed (luminal diameter narrowing > 50%) or not. Invasive coronary angiography was used as the reference standard.

RESULTS

In 71 (62.3%) of the patients, 241 significant coronary artery stenoses were identified with invasive coronary angiography. In 11 (9.7%) of the patients, 1.6% (26/1,672) of the segments were not evaluable with CT. Overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values in a patient-based analysis were 97%, 81%, 90%, and 95%, respectively. Image quality was better (p < 0.05) in the low average heart rate group than in the high average heart rate group, but diagnostic accuracy was comparable for the two groups. In contrast, image quality and diagnostic accuracy were significantly better (p < 0.01) among patients in the low heart rate variability group than in the high heart rate variability group.

CONCLUSION

Lower heart rate variability is associated with higher diagnostic accuracy of 64-MDCT coronary angiography.

Transthoracic echocardiography in the detection of chronic total coronary artery occlusion

AIMS

The aim of our study was to detect chronic total occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), circumflex coronary artery (Cx), and right coronary artery (RCA) using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in 110 consecutive patients who underwent coronary angiography for investigation of angina.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Coronary blood flow direction was assessed in the epicardial collaterals [distal LAD (dLAD), obtuse marginal branches and right posterior descending artery (PDA)] and intramyocardial collaterals [LAD septal branch (SB LAD) and RCA septal branch (SB RCA)]. The sensitivity and specificity of retrograde flow for identification of the occluded LAD by TTE in the dLAD only were 78 and 96%, respectively, and those in both dLAD and SB LAD were 89 and 96%, respectively. The retrograde SB LAD flow detects proximal LAD occlusion with 88% sensitivity and 75% specificity. The sensitivity and specificity of retrograde flow for identification of the occluded RCA by TTE in the PDA only were 79 and 97%, respectively, and those in both PDA and SB RCA were 89 and 97%, respectively. The retrograde SB RCA flow does not allow us to differentiate between proximal and non-proximal RCA occlusion. Transthoracic echocardiography is not a method for diagnosing Cx occlusions as the success in visualizing the Cx epicardial collaterals was achieved in 31% of cases only.

CONCLUSION

TTE is a sensitive and highly specific non-invasive method for diagnosis of LAD and RCA occlusions, based on the detection of the coronary blood flow direction in the epicardial and intramyocardial collaterals.

Multislice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography: Risk Stratification of Patients in the Perioperative Period

Multislice computed tomography coronary angiography is emerging as a reliable noninvasive method for the assessmentofcoronaryarterydisease, coronaryanatomyand cardiac function. Improvements in computed tomography technology hold the promise of replacing the standard invasive procedure of conventional coronary angiography in selected patient groups. The ability of a six-second scan to identify flow-limiting coronary artery stenoses as well as characterising coronary atheromatous plaque components provides valuable information that can assist in refining perioperative cardiovascular risk. Multislice computed tomography's high negative predictive value and high specificity for stenoses allows it to effectively rule out coronary artery disease in patients with cardiac risk factors who have non-diagnostic or equivocal noninvasive cardiac stress tests. Other uses include evaluating patients who are symptomatic following percutaneous coronary intervention, evaluating coronary artery bypass grafts and coronary stent patency, detecting coronary stenosis prior to valve surgery and assessing coronary anatomy in patients with technically difficult arterial access. Avoiding the small but definite risks of conventional coronary angiography makes cardiac computed tomography an appealing alternative. An overview of multislice computed tomography is presented with particular attention placed on its role in the risk stratification of selected patients in the perioperative period. A risk stratification algorithm is suggested.

Image quality on dual-source computed-tomographic coronary angiography

Multi-detector CT reliably permits visualization of coronary arteries, but due to the occurrence of motion artefacts at heart rates >65 bpm caused by a temporal resolution of 165 ms, its utilisation has so far been limited to patients with a preferably low heart rate. We investigated the assessment of image quality on computed tomography of coronary arteries in a large series of patients without additional heart rate control using dual-source computed tomography (DSCT). DSCT (Siemens Somatom Definition, 83-ms temporal resolution) was performed in 165 consecutive patients (mean age 64 +/- 11.4 years) after injection of 60-80 ml of contrast. Data sets were reconstructed in 5% intervals of the cardiac cycle and evaluated by two readers in consensus concerning evaluability of the coronary arteries and presence of motion and beam-hardening artefacts using the AHA 16-segment coronary model. Mean heart rate during CT was 65 +/- 10.5 bpm; visualisation without artefacts was possible in 98.7% of 2,541 coronary segments. Only two segments were considered unevaluable due to cardiac motion; 30 segments were unassessable due to poor signal-to-noise ratio or coronary calcifications (both n = 15). Data reconstruction at 65-70% of the cardiac cycle provided for the best image quality. For heart rates >85 bpm, a systolic reconstruction at 45% revealed satisfactory results. Compared with earlier CT generations, DSCT provides for non-invasive coronary angiography with diagnostic image quality even at heart rates >65 bpm and thus may broaden the spectrum of patients that can be investigated non-invasively.

Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with low, intermediate, and high cardiovascular risk

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA) in groups of patients with low, intermediate, and high risk for coronary artery disease (CAD) events.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The institutional review board approved this study; written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Eighty-eight consecutive patients with suspected CAD (40 women; mean age, 64.3 +/- 9.4 years; range, 39-82) underwent CTCA, calcium scoring, and invasive coronary angiography and were grouped according to their Framingham 10-year risk for hard coronary events into low (<10%), intermediate (10%-20%), and high (>20%) risk categories. Significant stenoses (luminal diameter narrowing > or =50%) were assessed on an intention-to-diagnose-basis; no coronary segment was excluded and nonevaluative segments were rated false positive. To determine differences between groups, Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed for individually determined values of diagnostic performance.

RESULTS

Per-patient sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive, and positive predictive values were 90.0%, 79.2%, 95.0%, and 64.3%, respectively, with low (n = 34), 87.5%, 92.3%, 85.7%, and 93.3%, respectively, with intermediate (n = 29), and 100%, 75.0%, 100%, and 89.5%, respectively, with high risk (n = 25), with a trend toward higher positive predictive value (P = .07). Per-segment negative predictive value was lower with high pretest probability (P < .01). Mean calcium-score units were 90, 220, and 312 (P = .23), and the prevalence of CAD was 29.4%, 55.2%, and 68.0% (P < .01) with low, intermediate, and high risk.

CONCLUSION

Sensitivity and specificity of CTCA are not influenced by the prevalence of CAD, whereas the negative predictive value is lower and the positive predictive value tends to be higher in patients with a high prevalence of CAD.

Noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography in an unselected patient collective: Effect of heart rate, heart rate variability and coronary calcifications on image quality and diagnostic accuracy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of heart rate, heart rate variability and calcification on image quality and diagnostic accuracy in an unselected patient collective.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

One hundred and two consecutive patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease underwent both 64-MSCT and invasive coronary angiography. Image quality (IQ) was assessed by independent observers using a 4-point scale from excellent (1) to non-diagnostic (4). Accuracy of MSCT regarding detection or exclusion of significant stenosis (>50%) was evaluated on a per segment basis in a modified AHA 13-segment model. Effects of heart rate, heart rate variability, calcification and body mass index (BMI) on IQ and accuracy were evaluated by multivariate regression. IQ and accuracy were further analysed in subgroups of significant predictor variables and simple regression performed to calculate thresholds for adequate IQ.

RESULTS

Mean heart rate was 68.2+/-13.3 bpm, mean heart rate variability 11.5+/-16.0 beats per CT-examination (bpct) and median Agatston score 226.5. Average IQ score was 2+/-0.6 whilst diagnostic quality was obtained in 89% of segments. Overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV or NPV was 91.2%, 99.2%, 95.3% or 98.3%. According to multivariate regression, overall IQ was significantly related to heart rate and calcification (P=0.0038; P<0.0001). The effect of heart rate variability was limited to IQ of RCA segments (P=0.018); BMI was not related to IQ (P=0.52). Calcification was the only predictor variable with significant effect on the number of non-diagnostic segments (P<0.0001). In a multivariate regression, calcification was also the single factor with impact on diagnostic accuracy (P=0.0049).

CONCLUSION

Whilst heart rate, heart rate variability and calcification all show an inverse correlation to IQ, severe calcium burden remains the single factor with translation of such effect into decrease of diagnostic accuracy.

Dual-source CT: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability, and calcification on image quality and diagnostic accuracy

PURPOSE

To prospectively evaluate the effect of heart rate, heart rate variability, and calcification on dual-source computed tomography (CT) image quality and to prospectively assess diagnostic accuracy of dual-source CT for coronary artery stenosis, by using invasive coronary angiography as the reference standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study had local Ethics Committee approval; all patients gave informed consent. Patients who underwent bypass surgery were excluded; patients with coronary artery stent-grafts were included. One hundred patients (20 women, 80 men; mean age, 62 years +/- 10 [standard deviation]) known to have or suspected of having coronary artery disease underwent dual-source CT and invasive coronary angiography. Image quality was assessed. Accuracy of dual-source CT in depiction or exclusion of significant stenosis (>or=50%) was evaluated on a per-segment and per-patient basis. Effects of heart rate, heart rate variability, and calcification on image quality and accuracy were analyzed by using multivariate regression and were analyzed between subgroups of predictor variables. Simple regression was performed to calculate thresholds for adequate image quality.

RESULTS

Mean heart rate was 64.9 beats per minute +/- 13.2, mean variability was 23.6 beats per CT examination +/- 36.2, and mean Agatston score was 786.5 +/- 965.9. Diagnostic image quality was obtained in 90.2% of segments. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the presence of significant stenosis were, respectively, 91.1%, 92.0%, 75.4%, and 97.5% by segment and 100%, 81.5%, 93.6%, and 100% by patient. Image quality was significantly related to heart rate variability (P = .015) and calcification (P < .001); the number of nondiagnostic segments was significantly affected by calcification only. Calcification was the single factor with significant impact on diagnostic accuracy (P = .001).

CONCLUSION

While dual-source CT resulted in heart-rate independent image quality, image quality remained prone to heart rate variability and calcification.

Comparison of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of stress testing versus 64-multislice coronary computed tomography angiography in predicting obstructive coronary artery disease diagnosed by coronary angiography

Sixty-four-multislice coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and coronary angiography were performed in 145 patients (mean age 67 +/- 10 years), and stress testing was performed in 47 of these patients to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of coronary CTA and of stress testing in diagnosing obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with suspected CAD. In 145 patients, coronary CTA had 98% sensitivity, 74% specificity, 90% positive predictive value, and 94% negative predictive value in diagnosing obstructive CAD. In 47 patients, stress testing had 69% sensitivity, 36% specificity, 78% positive predictive value, and 27% negative predictive value for diagnosing obstructive CAD, whereas coronary CTA had 100% sensitivity, 73% specificity, 92% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value for diagnosing obstructive CAD. In conclusion, coronary CTA has better sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value than stress testing in diagnosing obstructive CAD.