Anxiety sensitivity and intolerance of uncertainty: requisites of the fundamental fears?

A transdiagnostic examination of intolerance of uncertainty across anxiety and depressive disorders

Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) has been identified as a potential maintaining factor for generalised anxiety disorder; however, there is a growing evidence to suggest that IU may contribute to other anxiety and depressive disorders. Moreover, certain components of IU (namely prospective and inhibitory IU) have been shown to be differentially associated with symptoms of emotional disorders. The aim of this study was to determine the extent to which individuals with various anxiety and depressive disorders endorsed IU, firstly as a trait variable (with prospective and inhibitory components) and secondly in reference to regularly occurring, diagnostically relevant situations (situation-specific IU). The degree to which diagnosis predicted IU was examined in a highly comorbid clinical sample (N=218). Regardless of specific diagnoses, the degree of comorbidity emerged as a significant predictor of prospective IU and situation-specific IU. Conversely, specific diagnoses of social phobia, generalised anxiety disorder, depression, and obsessive compulsive disorder were uniquely related to inhibitory IU. These findings suggest that IU is a transdiagnostic construct and have implications for current diagnosis-specific and transdiagnostic theory and clinical practice.

Neural correlates of altered general emotion processing in social anxiety disorder

Specific anxiety disorders are characterized by altered emotion processing of phobia-specific stimuli at the neurobiological level. Recent work has concentrated on specific anxiety-provoking stimuli; focusing on arousal- or fear-related brain areas such as the amygdala. We analyzed brain activation during the cued anticipation of unpleasant or uncertain emotional stimuli as a means of modeling an unspecific anxiety-laden situation. Sixteen patients with social anxiety disorder (SAD) and eighteen healthy control subjects completed a task during functional magnetic resonance imaging involving the anticipation of cued visual stimuli with prior known emotional valence (positive, negative, and neutral) or prior unknown/ambiguous emotional content. The anticipated stimuli had no social phobia specific content. During the anticipation of emotional stimuli of prior known negative and prior ambiguous emotional valence, brain activity in patients with SAD was increased in the upper midbrain/dorsal thalamus, the amygdala, and in temporo-occipital and parietal regions as compared to control subjects. Activity was decreased in SAD in left orbitofrontal cortex. Activations in the amygdala and in occipital regions correlated with trait anxiety and social anxiety measures. In conclusion, SAD was associated with enhanced activation in brain regions involved in emotional arousal as well as in attention and perception processing during the anticipation of non-specific, general emotional stimuli. Hence, our results suggest that patients with SAD not only have an altered processing of specific feared stimuli, but also a more generally disturbed emotion processing in basic neural pathways. These findings have implications for diagnostic models and the treatment of SAD.

Achieving certainty about the structure of intolerance of uncertainty in a treatment-seeking sample with anxiety and depression

Evidence is accumulating that intolerance of uncertainty (IU) may be a transdiagnostic maintaining factor across the anxiety disorders and depression. However, psychometric studies of the most commonly used measure of IU have typically used undergraduate students, and the factor structure has been highly inconsistent. Previous studies have also tended to focus on one diagnostic subgroup or related symptom, thereby limiting transdiagnostic comparisons. The first aim of this study was to test the latent structure of a commonly used measure of IU in a treatment-seeking sample with anxiety and depression (n=463). The second aim was to examine psychometric properties of the best fitting solution, including internal reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to compare the goodness of fit of five models previously found with undergraduate and community samples. A two-factor solution, comprising of prospective anxiety and inhibitory anxiety, was the best fitting model. The total scale and subscales demonstrated excellent internal reliability. Convergent validity was demonstrated by the scales correlating with symptoms associated with five anxiety disorders and depression, as well as neuroticism, distress and disability. IU explained unique variance in all symptom measures, even after controlling for neuroticism and other symptom measures. Evidence of discriminant validity was also found for each IU subscale. Findings support reliability and validity of the two-factor solution, and are consistent with IU being a transdiagnostic maintaining factor.

Revisiting the latent structure of the anxiety sensitivity construct: more evidence of dimensionality

Anxiety sensitivity (AS) was initially conceptualized as existing along a continuum; however, emerging evidence from taxometric analyses is mixed as to whether the latent structure of AS is dimensional or taxonic. The purpose of the present study was to further evaluate the latent structure of AS in an effort to clarify the contrasting findings reported in the literature. To do so, we examined the latent structure of AS in two large independent samples unselected with regard to AS level (comprising undergraduate respondents and/or community residents). MAXEIG and MAMBAC analyses were performed with indicator sets drawn from distinct self-report measures of AS within either sample. MAXEIG and MAMBAC, as well as comparison analyses utilizing simulated taxonic and dimensional datasets, yielded converging evidence that AS has a dimensional latent structure. Implications of these finding for the conceptualization and measurement of AS are discussed and future research directions are highlighted.

Posttraumatic stress and social anxiety: the interaction of traumatic events and interpersonal fears

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and social anxiety disorder (SAD) are frequently comorbid among veteran and community samples. Several studies have demonstrated significant comorbidity between trauma, PTSD, and social anxiety (SA), and a growing number of studies have explored the nature of this association. Although a diagnosis of either PTSD or SAD alone can result in significant impairment in social and occupational functioning, these difficulties are often magnified in persons suffering from both disorders. This review describes the current state-of-the-art regarding the co-occurrence of trauma, PTSD, and SA. First, we provide an overview of empirical data on the prevalence of co-occurring trauma, PTSD, and SAD. Second, we describe possible explanatory models of the co-occurrence, with a specific focus on the shared vulnerability model. Third, we review the available empirical data addressing the postulates of this model, including both genetic and psychological vulnerabilities. Fourth, we describe additional factors-guilt, shame, and depressive symptoms-that may help to explain the co-occurrence of PTSD and SA. A better understanding of this complex relationship will improve the efficacy of treatment for individuals suffering from both disorders. We conclude with key areas for future research.

A meta-analytic review of the association between anxiety sensitivity and pain

In recent years, anxiety sensitivity (AS) has demonstrated applicability across a wide range of conditions. An area of particular interest has been the association between AS and pain. This study aimed to provide an accounting of the magnitude of this effect across studies of both clinical and nonclinical pain. Forty-one studies (14 clinical and 27 nonclinical pain) were evaluated in this meta-analytic review and represented the study of 5,908 participants (2,093 for clinical and 3,815 for nonclinical pain studies). Results indicate that AS was strongly associated with fearful appraisals of pain, with more modest results for measures of pain tolerance/threshold and pain-related disability. Implications of these results for the treatment of chronic pain are discussed.

Life events in panic disorder-an update on "candidate stressors"

Studies on gene-environment interactions in mental disorders are characterized by powerful genetic techniques and well defined "candidate genes," whereas a definition of "candidate stressors," in most cases assessed in the form of life events (LEs), is inconsistent or not even provided. This review addresses this problem, with particular attention to the clinical phenotype of panic disorder (PD), by providing an overview and critical discussion for which life events are known to contribute to the etiology of the disease and how they may be conceptualized. There is converging evidence for a significant impact of cumulative as well as specific life events, such as threat, interpersonal and health-related events in adulthood, and abuse or loss/separation experiences in childhood, respectively, on the pathogenesis of panic disorder with some overlapping effect across the anxiety disorder spectrum as well as on comorbid major depression. Besides genetic vulnerability factors, personality and behavioral characteristics, such as anxiety sensitivity, neuroticism, and cognitive appraisal might moderate the influence of LEs on the development of panic disorder. The present state of knowledge regarding the specification and conceptualization of LEs in PD within a more complex multifactorial model, involving mediating and moderating factors in between genes and the clinical phenotype, is hoped to aid in informing future gene-environment interaction studies in panic disorder.

Intolerance of uncertainty in adolescents: correlations with worry, social anxiety, and depression

The current study examined Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU)-the tendency to react negatively to situations that are uncertain-in psychological problems among adolescents. Using data from 191 adolescents, aged 14 to 18, we examined (a) the dimensionality of IU as tapped by the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale short-form (IUS-12), (b) the relationship of IU with worry, social anxiety, and depression, (c) the specificity of IU to these variables, and (d) the role of IU as a mediator of the linkages between negative affectivity (NA) and worry, social anxiety, and depression. Results showed that the IUS-12 encompassed 2 components of IU, named Prospective Anxiety and Inhibitory Anxiety. Furthermore, IU was specifically related with worry and social anxiety, but not depression, when controlling the shared variance between these variables and NA, age, and gender. Finally, IU and its 2 components were found to mediate the linkages of NA with worry and social anxiety.

"It's not just the judgements--It's that I don't know": intolerance of uncertainty as a predictor of social anxiety

Interest in the role of intolerance of uncertainty (IU) - the tendency for a person to consider the possibility of a negative event occurring as unacceptable and threatening irrespective of the probability of its occurrence - in anxiety disorders has been increasing in recent research. IU has been implicated as an important construct associated with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD); however, a growing body of research suggests that levels of IU are also high among individuals with other anxiety disorders. Despite the increasing interest, few studies have examined the relationship between IU and social anxiety (SA). The purpose of the present investigation was to further investigate the relationship between IU and SA. Participants included 286 community members (71% women) from Canada who completed measures of IU, SA, anxiety sensitivity, and fear of negative evaluation (FNE). Regression analyses revealed that the inhibitory anxiety dimension of IU, the fear of socially observable anxiety symptoms dimension of anxiety sensitivity, and the FNE were consistently significant predictors of SA symptoms. Unexpectedly, IU and FNE were often comparable predictors of SA variance. Moreover, participants with SA symptoms consistent with SAD exhibited levels of IU comparable to those reported by participants with worry symptoms consistent with GAD. Comprehensive findings, implications, and directions for future research are discussed.

Integrating anxiety sensitivity, distress tolerance, and discomfort intolerance: a hierarchical model of affect sensitivity and tolerance

The purpose of the present investigation was to concurrently examine the latent dimensional and hierarchical structure of anxiety sensitivity (AS) and two key theoretically relevant and related affect (in)tolerance and sensitivity constructs: distress tolerance and discomfort intolerance. These constructs were measured using the Anxiety Sensitivity Index (Reiss, Peterson, Gursky, & McNally, 1986), the Distress Tolerance Scale (Simons & Gaher, 2005), and the Discomfort Intolerance Scale (Schmidt, Richey, & Fitzpatrick, 2006). A total of 229 individuals (124 females; M(age)=21.0 years, SD=7.5) without current Axis I psychopathology participated by completing a battery of self-report questionnaires. A two-stage exploratory factor analysis was conducted to examine the lower- and higher-order latent structural relations among the variables. The factor solution was subsequently evaluated in relation to negative affectivity, anxious arousal, and anhedonic depression. AS and distress tolerance appeared to be related to one another as distinct lower-order facets of a common higher-order affect tolerance and sensitivity factor, whereas discomfort intolerance did not appear to demonstrate similar relations with either AS or distress tolerance at the lower-order or higher-order levels. A unique pattern of association with theoretically-relevant criterion variables was observed between the affect tolerance and sensitivity higher-order factor, the AS and distress tolerance lower-order factors, and the discomfort intolerance factor. Findings are discussed in the context of theoretical and clinical implications and future directions for the study of affect tolerance and sensitivity in relation to emotional vulnerability.

Waddell's symptoms as indicators of psychological distress, perceived disability, and treatment outcome

INTRODUCTION

Waddell's signs and symptoms have been described as patient presentations not within usual anatomic patterns of injury pathology. Waddell's signs were thought to indicate psychological distress and were termed "non-organic findings"; similarly, Waddell's symptoms were described as inappropriate and attributable to psychological features. Endorsement of more than two of Waddell's symptoms is thought to be associated with psychological distress, disability, and poor treatment outcomes; however, this has not been empirically assessed.

METHODS

The current study used a sample of patients (n = 108; 30% women) involved in a multi-disciplinary work hardening program provided by a third-party insurer. Patients who endorsed more than two of Waddell's symptoms were compared with those who did not on demographic variables as well as self-report measures of psychological distress, disability, and treatment outcome.

RESULTS

Patients who endorsed more than two of Waddell's symptoms reported higher levels of psychological distress, perceived disability, pain intensity, and pain durations. Moreover, consistent with previous research on Waddell's symptoms, patients endorsing more than two symptoms were also less likely to return to work.

CONCLUSIONS

Waddell's symptoms were associated with increased perceived disability and pervasive pain interference. Patients who endorsed more than two symptoms were significantly less likely to return to work than those who endorsed zero, one, or two symptoms. Patients who endorsed more than two symptoms may indeed be affected by factors beyond tissue pathology that nonetheless warrant clinical attention. Waddell's symptoms appear to have promise as a quick indicator of treatment complexity and outcome.

Evaluation of intolerance of uncertainty: development and validation of a new self-report measure

Intolerance of uncertainty represents an important risk factor for development of anxiety disorders. However, few measures have been developed in order to evaluate this construct. Four studies were conducted in order to validate a new instrument evaluating intolerance of uncertainty: the Intolerance of Uncertainty Inventory (IUI). The first study described the questionnaire's development and evaluated the psychometric properties of its preliminary version. Study 2 examined the reliability and the factorial validity of the final version of the questionnaire, while Study 3 mainly addressed its convergent validity. Finally, Study 4 examined the questionnaire's temporal stability. Factorial analyses confirmed the IUI's validity. Results also supported the IUI's reliability, convergent validity, and temporal stability. The IUI is the first instrument that offers the possibility of measuring intolerance of uncertainty as a tendency to consider uncertainties to be unacceptable, as well as in terms of cognitive and behavioral manifestations.