Vertebral Fracture Assessment: the 2007 ISCD Official Positions

Vitamin D insufficiency: a risk factor to vertebral fractures in community-dwelling elderly women

OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk factors for the presence of moderate/severe vertebral fracture, specifically 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD).

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study conducted for 2 years in the city of São Paulo, Brazil including community-dwelling elderly women.

METHODS

Bone mineral density (BMD), serum 25-OHD, intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), calcium and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were examined in 226 women without vertebral fractures (NO FRACTURE group) and 189 women with at least one moderate/severe vertebral fracture (FRACTURE group). Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) was evaluated using both the Genant semiquantitative (SQ) approach and morphometry.

RESULTS

Patients in the NO FRACTURE group had lower age, increased height, higher calcium intake, and higher BMD compared to those patients in the FRACTURE group (p<0.05). Of interest, serum levels of 25-OHD in the NO FRACTURE group were higher than those observed in the FRACTURE group (51.73 nmol/L vs. 42.31 nmol/L, p<0.001). Reinforcing this finding, vitamin D insufficiency (25-OHD<75 nmol/L) was observed less in the NO FRACTURE group (82.3% vs. 93.65%, p=0.001). After adjustment for significant variables within the patient population (age, height, race, calcium intake, 25-OHD, eGFR and sites BMD), the logistic-regression analyses revealed that age (OR=1.09, 95% CI 1.04-1.14, p<0.001) femoral neck BMD (OR=0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.82, p<0.001) and 25-OHD <75 nmol/L (OR=2.38, 95% CI 1.17-4.8, p=0.016) remains a significant factor for vertebral fracture.

CONCLUSION

Vitamin D insufficiency is a contributing factor for moderate/severe vertebral fractures. This result emphasizes the importance of including this modifiable risk factor in the evaluation of elderly women.

Progress in osteoporosis and fracture prevention: focus on postmenopausal women

In the past decade, we have witnessed a revolution in osteoporosis diagnosis and therapeutics. This includes enhanced understanding of basic bone biology, recognizing the severe consequences of fractures in terms of morbidity and short-term re-fracture and mortality risk and case finding based on clinical risks, bone mineral density, new imaging approaches, and contributors to secondary osteoporosis. Medical interventions that reduce fracture risk include sufficient calcium and vitamin D together with a wide spectrum of drug therapies (with antiresorptive, anabolic, or mixed effects). Emerging therapeutic options that target molecules of bone metabolism indicate that the next decade should offer even greater promise for further improving our diagnostic and treatment approaches.

The official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry: perceptions and commentary

The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) periodically issues Official Positions (OPs) on the assessment of skeletal health in adults and children. OPs are recommendations regarding topics that include nomenclature, indications, acquisition, analysis, quality control, interpretation, reporting, and clinical utility of measuring bone density using different technologies. The purpose of these directives is to assist health care professionals in the practice of clinical densitometry. The OPs are established through a rigorous process of scientific literature review by ISCD task forces, each assigned to address a group of clinically relevant questions. The findings and recommendations of each task force are assessed and revised, as needed, by an international panel of experts. Recommendations that are felt to be appropriate for inclusion as ISCD OPs are sent to the ISCD Board of Directors for final approval. Despite having a major impact in the clinical application of bone densitometry, the ISCD OPs have not been universally adopted, in part because of misunderstanding of the process used to establish them and the way that they are intended for use in clinical practice. This is a review of the benefits and limitations of the ISCD OPs with emphasis on areas of controversy.

Morphometric vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with primary hyperparathyroidism

CONTEXT

An increased risk of fracture in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) compared to the general population has been reported, but available data are controversial.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the rate of vertebral fractures (VFs) by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in postmenopausal women with sporadic PHPT and compare the results with a control group.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A case-control study was performed at a referral center.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 150 consecutive patients and 300 healthy women matched for age and menopausal age participated in the study.

RESULTS

VFs were detected in 37 of 150 (24.6%) patients and 12 of 300 (4.0%) controls (P < 0.0001). The majority of VFs were mild. Stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis showed that in PHPT patients lumbar spine bone mineral density was the only variable independently associated with the prevalence of VFs (P = 0.003). The rate of fracture was higher in symptomatic (34.1%) than asymptomatic (21.1%) patients, but this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.15). Among asymptomatic patients, fracture rate was significantly higher in those who met the criteria for parathyroidectomy (28.1%) than in those who did not (11.1%) (P = 0.03). Compared to controls, the fracture rate was significantly higher in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic PHPT who met the criteria for surgery (P < 0.0001), but not in those who did not meet the criteria (P = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

VF rate is increased in postmenopausal women with PHPT compared to controls, independently of whether they are classified as symptomatic or asymptomatic. The question of whether the finding of mild morphometric VFs in the latter represents an indication for parathyroid surgery remains to be established.

Teriparatide vertebral fracture risk reduction determined by quantitative and qualitative radiographic assessment

OBJECTIVE

Most registration studies for new osteoporosis drugs have used a combination of quantitative morphometry (QM) and visual semiquantitative reading (SQ) to define vertebral fractures. However, in the pivotal teriparatide Fracture Prevention Trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00670501), vertebral fractures were previously defined only by the SQ methodology. The objective of this study was to define the effect of teriparatide on the incidence of vertebral fractures defined by QM plus SQ assessment.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Radiographs from the Fracture Prevention Trial placebo- and teriparatide 20 microg/day groups were re-assessed in blinded fashion, defining incident vertebral fractures for vertebrae meeting all of the following requirements: (a) 20% decrease in height by QM, (b) a corresponding 4 mm decrease in height (c) an increase of at least one grade by visual SQ assessment by a radiologist.

RESULTS

By this methodology, vertebral fracture risk was reduced in the teriparatide versus placebo group by 84% (RR = 0.16, p < 0.001). The risk of two or more vertebral fractures was also significantly reduced by 94% (RR = 0.06, p < 0.001). The fractures in the teriparatide group were of lesser severity than the fractures in the placebo group. The absolute benefit of teriparatide was greatest in those patients with the highest number and severity of prevalent vertebral fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

As assessed by QM plus SQ, teriparatide reduced the incidence of vertebral fractures.

Use of anthropometric indicators in screening for undiagnosed vertebral fractures: a cross-sectional analysis of the Fukui Osteoporosis Cohort (FOC) study

Background

Vertebral fractures are the most common type of osteoporotic fracture. Although often asymptomatic, each vertebral fracture increases the risk of additional fractures. Development of a safe and simple screening method is necessary to identify individuals with asymptomatic vertebral fractures.

Methods

Lateral imaging of the spine by single energy X-ray absorptiometry and vertebral morphometry were conducted in 116 Japanese women (mean age: 69.9 ± 9.3 yr). Vertebral deformities were diagnosed by the McCloskey-Kanis criteria and were used as a proxy for vertebral fractures. We evaluated whether anthropometric parameters including arm span-height difference (AHD), wall-occiput distance (WOD), and rib-pelvis distance (RPD) were related to vertebral deformities. Positive findings were defined for AHD as ≥ 4.0 cm, for WOD as ≥ 5 mm, and for RPD as ≤ two fingerbreadths. Receiver operating characteristics curves analysis was performed, and cut-off values were determined to give maximum difference between sensitivity and false-positive rate. Expected probabilities for vertebral deformities were calculated using logistic regression analysis.

Results

The mean AHD for those participants with and without vertebral deformities were 7.0 ± 4.1 cm and 4.2 ± 4.2 cm (p < 0.01), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for use of AHD-positive, WOD-positive and RPD-positive values in predicting vertebral deformities were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.69, 1.01) and 0.52 (95% CI: 0.42, 0.62); 0.70 (95% CI: 0.50, 0.90) and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.57, 0.76); and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.47, 0.87) and 0.59 (95% CI: 0.50, 0.69), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio for a positive result (LR) for use of combined AHD-positive and WOD-positive values were 0.65 (95% CI: 0.44, 0.86), 0.81 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.89), and 3.47 (95% CI: 3.01, 3.99), respectively. The expected probability of vertebral deformities (P) was obtained by the equation; P = 1-(exp [-1.327-0.040 × body weight +1.332 × WOD-positive + 1.623 × AHD-positive])^-1. The sensitivity, specificity and LR for use of a 0.306 cut-off value for probability of vertebral fractures were 0.65 (95% CI: 0.44, 0.86), 0.87 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.93), and 4.82 (95% CI: 4.00, 5.77), respectively.

Conclusion

Both WOD and AHD effectively predicted vertebral deformities. This screening method could be used in a strategy to prevent additional vertebral fractures, even when X-ray technology is not available.

Vertebral fracture assessment in healthy men: prevalence and risk factors

INTRODUCTION

Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) is a technology that can reliably and accurately diagnose vertebral fractures with greater patient convenience, less radiation exposure, and lower cost than standard spine radiography.

OBJECTIVE

To study prevalence and risk factors of vertebral fractures using VFA in healthy men.

METHODS

The study cohort consists of a population of 216 healthy men aged between 50 and 79 (mean age, weight and BMI of 63.8 years, 73.3 kg and 25.7 kg/m2, respectively). Lateral VFA images and scans of the lumbar spine and proximal femur were obtained by two technologists using a GE Healthcare Lunar Prodigy densitometer. Vertebral fractures were defined using a combination of Genant semiquantitative (SQ) approach and morphometry.

RESULTS

Ninety-three percent of vertebrae from T4-L4 and 98% from T8-L4 were adequately visualized on VFA. Vertebral fractures were detected in 29.6% (64/216) of these men: 34/216 (15.7%) had grade 1 and 30/216 (13.8%) had grades 2 or 3. Twenty one of men with VFA-identified fracture (32.8%) had only a single vertebral fracture, while the other 67.2% had two or more. Fractures were most common in the mid-thoracic spine and at the thoraco-lumbar junction. As would be expected, the prevalence of VFA-detected fractures increased with age and as BMD declined. This group of men had a statistically significant lower weight, height, calcium consumption and T-score than those without a VFA-identified vertebral fracture. Regression analysis showed that presence of vertebral fracture was mainly related to the osteoporotic status (OR: 9.0; 95% CI: 3.5-22.8).

CONCLUSION

VFA allows evaluation of the majority of vertebral bodies in men. Vertebral fractures are common in healthy men and are related to low BMD.