Tumour and target volumes in permanent prostate brachytherapy: A supplement to the ESTRO/EAU/EORTC recommendations on prostate brachytherapy

Comparison of seed brachytherapy or external beam radiotherapy (70 Gy or 74 Gy) in 919 low-risk prostate cancer patients

PURPOSE

The aim of this analysis was to compare the biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) rates in low-risk prostate cancer patients treated at two centers of excellence using different approaches: seed brachytherapy (BT) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 919 low-risk prostate cancer patients, treated from 1998-2008, were identified in the two databases. In Utrecht, 667 patients received I-125 BT applying a dose of 144 Gy. In Vienna, 252 patients were treated with EBRT, applying a local dose of 70 Gy in 82 patients and 74 Gy in 170 patients. bNED rates (Phoenix definition) were assessed.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 46 months (range 1-148 months). The 5-year actuarial bNED rates were 94% for BT patients and 88% for EBRT patients (p = 0.002)-84% for patients receiving 70 Gy and 91% for patients receiving 74 Gy, respectively. In the univariate analysis, patients receiving 70 Gy showed significantly worse outcome compared to BT (p = 0.001) and a difference close to significance compared to 74 Gy (p = 0.06). In the multivariate analysis including tumor stage, Gleason score, initial PSA, hormonal therapy, and dose, patients receiving 70 Gy EBRT showed significantly worse bNED rates compared to BT patients.

CONCLUSION

Low-risk prostate cancer patients receiving 74 Gy by EBRT show comparable biochemical control rates to patients receiving seed brachytherapy, whereas patients receiving 70 Gy show significantly worse outcome.

Report of a consensus meeting on focal low dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer

What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Whole gland brachytherapy has been used to successfully treat prostate cancer but the protocol for focal therapy has not previously been established. The consensus findings provide guidance on patient selection for focal brachytherapy as well as recommendations for conducting therapy and patient follow-up. Low dose rate prostate brachytherapy is an effective treatment for localized prostate cancer. Recently, it has been considered for use in a focused manner whereby treatment is targeted only to areas of prostate cancer. The objective of focal brachytherapy is to provide effective cancer control for low-risk disease but with reduced genitourinary and rectal side-effects in a cost-effective way. We report on the outputs of a consensus meeting of international experts in brachytherapy and focal therapy convened to consider the feasibility and potential development of focal brachytherapy. A number of factors were considered for focal brachytherapy including optimal patient selection, disease characterization and localization, treatment protocols and outcome measures. The consensus meeting also addressed the design of a clinical trial that would assess the oncological outcomes and side-effect profiles resulting from focal brachytherapy.

Urinary morbidity after permanent prostate brachytherapy - impact of dose to the urethra vs. sources placed in close vicinity to the urethra

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The impact of the dose to the urethra and sources placed close to the urethra on urinary morbidity after permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) is not well known.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-nine patients were surveyed prospectively before treatment (A), 1 month after (B) and > 1 year after PPB (C) using a validated questionnaire (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite). Computed tomography (CT) postimplant scans were performed at days 1 (Foley catheter in situ) and 30 after PPB and sources within 5mm of the urethra at day 1 were identified.

RESULTS

As opposed to the urethral dose-volume histogram, a larger number of sources within 5mm of the urethra at day 1 predicted significantly larger urinary bother score changes at times B and C - with an impact on incontinence and frequency (e.g. moderate/big problem with leaking urine in 25% vs. 3%, p = 0.02; moderate/big problem with frequent urination in 33% vs. 7%, p < 0.01, at time C with vs. without ≥ 3 sources in a single strand placed close to the urethra).

CONCLUSIONS

Placement of sources with a minimum distance of a few mm to the urethra should be a major aim to avoid urinary morbidity irrespective of the urethral dose-volume histogram.

A comparison of preplan MRI and preplan CT-based prostate volume with intraoperative ultrasound-based prostate volume in real-time permanent brachytherapy

Purpose

The present study compared the difference between intraoperative transrectal ultrasound (iTRUS)-based prostate volume and preplan computed tomography (CT), preplan magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based prostate volume to estimate the number of seeds needed for appropriate dose coverage in permanent brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

Materials and Methods

Between March 2007 and March 2011, among 112 patients who underwent permanent brachytherapy with ¹²⁵I, 60 image scans of 56 patients who underwent preplan CT (pCT) or preplan MRI (pMRI) within 2 months before brachytherapy were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-four cases among 30 cases with pCT and 26 cases among 30 cases with pMRI received neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NHT). In 34 cases, NHT started after acquisition of preplan image. The median duration of NHT after preplan image acquisition was 17 and 21 days for cases with pCT and pMRI, respectively. The prostate volume calculated by different modalities was compared. And retrospective planning with iTRUS image was performed to estimate the number of ¹²⁵I seed required to obtain recommended dose distribution according to prostate volume.

Results

The mean difference in prostate volume was 9.05 mL between the pCT and iTRUS and 6.84 mL between the pMRI and iTRUS. The prostate volume was roughly overestimated by 1.36 times with pCT and by 1.33 times with pMRI. For 34 cases which received NHT after image acquisition, the prostate volume was roughly overestimated by 1.45 times with pCT and by 1.37 times with pMRI. A statistically significant difference was found between preplan image-based volume and iTRUS-based volume (p < 0.001). The median number of wasted seeds is approximately 13, when the pCT or pMRI volume was accepted without modification to assess the required number of seeds for brachytherapy.

Conclusion

pCT-based volume and pMRI-based volume tended to overestimate prostate volume in comparison to iTRUS-based volume. To reduce wasted seeds and cost of the brachytherapy, we should take the volume discrepancy into account when we estimate the number of ¹²⁵I seeds for permanent brachytherapy.

Image guided, adaptive, accelerated, high dose brachytherapy as model for advanced small volume radiotherapy

Brachytherapy has consistently provided a very conformal radiation therapy modality. Over the last two decades this has been associated with significant improvements in imaging for brachytherapy applications (prostate, gynecology), resulting in many positive advances in treatment planning, application techniques and clinical outcome. This is emphasized by the increased use of brachytherapy in Europe with gynecology as continuous basis and prostate and breast as more recently growing fields. Image guidance enables exact knowledge of the applicator together with improved visualization of tumor and target volumes as well as of organs at risk providing the basis for very individualized 3D and 4D treatment planning. In this commentary the most important recent developments in prostate, gynecological and breast brachytherapy are reviewed, with a focus on European recent and current research aiming at the definition of areas for important future research. Moreover the positive impact of GEC-ESTRO recommendations and the highlights of brachytherapy physics are discussed what altogether presents a full overview of modern image guided brachytherapy. An overview is finally provided on past and current international brachytherapy publications focusing on "Radiotherapy and Oncology". These data show tremendous increase in almost all research areas over the last three decades strongly influenced recently by translational research in regard to imaging and technology. In order to provide high level clinical evidence for future brachytherapy practice the strong need for comprehensive prospective clinical research addressing brachytherapy issues is high-lighted.

Multimodal approaches to high-risk prostate cancer

Widespread use of testing for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has led to a migration in the stage and grade of prostate cancer (PCa), with most men presenting with localized disease. However, 20%-35% of patients still present with high-risk disease (PSA > 20 ng/mL, biopsy Gleason score 8-10, or clinical stage T3). Despite advances in various treatment modalities, patients with high-risk disease have a significant chance of recurrence and death after surgery, often because of the presence of early occult metastasis at time of diagnosis. The optimal management of high-risk pca remains controversial. The present article aims to discuss the traditional approaches and the more recent evolution toward multimodal therapies.

Long-term experience with 181 patients who received transperineal I-125 implants for prostate cancer: Efficacy and urinary toxicity

Background: In low-risk prostate cancer, the target volume for radiotherapy is the prostate gland only and prostate brachytherapy with an I-125 implant provides the most conformal radiotherapy.

Methods: Patients underwent a pre-implant prostate volume study from which a treatment plan was developed 2 weeks prior to implant. A dosimetric study was performed 1 month following the implant. The prescription dose was 145 Gy with the 95% isodose line covering the entire target volume. The maximal dose to the urethra was less than 210 Gy. Follow-up included serum PSA and IPSS evaluation every 3 months during the first year and then every 6 months beginning in the second year.

Results: During December 2000–March 2009, 181 patients with early prostate cancer underwent I-125 implant. The median post-implant PSA value of the entire cohort was 0.7 ng/ml. No patient developed clinical failure. In the follow-up, nine patients had biochemical failure according to the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix definition (Nadir + 2.0 ng/ml). Of these, one patient refused hormonal therapy desiring to preserve sexual potency, and eight patients received hormonal therapy with a decreased serum PSA to 0.0 ng/ml. The treatment side effects were primarily urinary disturbances.

Conclusion: An I-125 implant is an effective and well-tolerated treatment and should be recommended for patients with low-risk prostate cancer.

[Prostate I-125 brachytherapy: critical evaluation of mid-term oncologic and functional results in 250 cases]

BACKGROUND

Even if brachytherapy (BT) in low-risk prostate cancer (CaP) is a common practice since more than 20 and 10 years in U.S.A. and Italy, respectively, it is still an uncommon procedure because of the problems related to the organization and collaboration among urologists, radiotherapists and physics, to the competition of alternative therapies, to dogmatic and educational beliefs, and to the poor knowledge of this technique.

METHODS

Between May 1999 and September 2010, 250 patients with low risk CaP underwent I125BT using a "real time" approach; the seeds implantation was performed using Mick applicator, in the first 190 patients, and the "Quick-Link" technique in the last 60 cases. Oncologic results were reported in the first 150 cases with a mean follow-up of 95 months, while functional outcomes and complications were assessed in all the patients at different time points with a mean follow-up of 65 months.

RESULTS

A good quality implantation was assessed in 88% of patients (D90 >140 Gy). Overall, a biochemical failure was assessed, in accordance with Phoenix criteria, in 10 patients (6.6%). Among these patients, the prostatic biopsy showed a CaP in 6/10 patients, who underwent retropubic radical prostatectomy (4 pts) and external RT (2 pts); only one patient developed a systemic progression with secondary bone lesions and died after 122 months and 36 months from BT and RRP, respectively. The 4/10 patients with negative biopsy were treated with total androgen blockade (2 pts) and with watchful waiting (2 pts). Regarding functional results, we assessed a moderate incidence of irritative disorders (70%) during the first six months and a good recovery of erectile function after one year from surgery (78.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Brachytherapy in the low-grade risk prostatic cancer represents a good alternative to RRP with excellent functional and oncologic results

Predictors in the outcome of 125I brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer

A number of different prostate cancer treatment modalities exist. Nomograms are used to assist clinicians and patients in choosing the most appropriate treatment. However, the predicted outcome for (125)I brachytherapy is much worse than what would be expected considering the actual survival rates. This underestimation may result in suboptimal treatment decisions. Therefore, better predictors for outcome after (125)I brachytherapy are necessary. The following factors, which may either influence outcome or predict outcome after brachytherapy, are discussed: tumor characteristics and risk stratification, patient age at treatment, obesity, adjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy, prostate-specific antigen bounce, implantation technique and dosimetry. For the prediction of outcome after (125)I brachytherapy, as long as the quality of the implant is optimal, only high-risk prostate cancer was found to have a negative impact on outcome.

Impact of urinary catheterization on dosimetry after prostate implant brachytherapy with palladium-103 or iodine-125

PURPOSE

Postoperative dosimetry is integral to quality assurance for prostate brachytherapy. Images on Day 0 are typically obtained with a contrast-filled urinary catheter in place for urethral dose calculations. However, expansion of the urethra and perhaps the prostate by the catheter may affect target coverage. We assessed the effect of urinary catheterization on target dosimetry after implantation with palladium-103 ((103)Pd) or iodine-125 ((125)I) seeds.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients were 29 consecutive men with postimplant dosimetry calculated with and without a urinary catheter after brachytherapy seed implantation; 19 patients received (103)Pd seeds and 10 patients received (125)I seeds. In each case, 14-French caude tip urinary catheters were placed before implantation, and axial CT slices of the pelvis were obtained before and after catheter removal for postimplant dosimetry. Dosimetric parameters were measured and compared with paired Student's t tests. Trends were assessed by linear regression with the Pearson correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

Removal of the urinary catheter significantly improved V(100) and D(90) for (103)Pd implants (mean±standard deviation (SD), 2.7%±4.2%; range, -0.4% to 15%; p=0.011 and mean±SD, 4.0%±3.4%; range, -0.1% to 13.8%; p<0.01, respectively). For (125)I implants, catheter removal improved D(90) (mean±SD, 1.5%±1.8%; range, -1.3% to 4.2%; p=0.027). For the (103)Pd group, the magnitude of change in V(100) correlated with prostate size (R(2)=0.16) and source number (R(2)=0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

Urinary catheterization can artificially reduce target coverage after prostate implant brachytherapy. The patients undergoing (103)Pd implantation with smaller (<30cm(3)) prostates and fewer (<90) sources are particularly susceptible to reduced D(90) and V(100) when a urinary catheter is present.

Patterns of care study for brachytherapy: results of the questionnaire for the years 2002 and 2007 in The Netherlands

Purpose

The goal of the ESTRO Patterns of Care study for Brachytherapy in Europe (PCBE) 2002 was to develop an aid to analyse brachytherapy practices. A 2^nd version of the PCB questionnaire was created for 2007. Data over 2007 were collected at the radiotherapy institutions in The Netherlands and compared with those from 2002. The aim of this study is to describe national brachytherapy practices, to demonstrate trends, and to provide data for rational health care planning.

Material and methods

Data were collected using a web-based questionnaire. For each centre, a local coordinator, responsible for coordinating the questionnaires and support of the further analysis was assigned. Data from the national cancer incidence registry was used for comparison with the data from the 21 Dutch departments.

Results

There was a decrease in low-dose rate equipment in parallel to an increase in both pulsed-dose rate and high-dose rate equipment. The use of 3D CT and MR based imaging techniques showed a slow rise. The most common clinical procedures were for prostate, gynaecological, and oesophageal tumours. A large increase (146%) in permanent implant prostate applications using 125I seeds was observed. The numbers of oesophageal and gynaecological treatments remained stable. There is concern on the low numbers of cases treated in some institutions for a few complex treatment sites. For head and neck, anal canal, paediatrics, bladder and eye interventions it ranged from 3-20 patients per year per institution.

Conclusions

The increase in number of patient treated with brachytherapy is in accordance with the increases in cancer incidence. The percentage of all radiotherapy patients treated with brachytherapy (approximately 5%) remained stable. The survey identified certain trends in resources and techniques, as well as areas of expected improvement and possible gain in clinical outcome. Data reported from this survey can be used for further planning of resources, facilities and concentration of a low-volume specialised and complex treatments.

Radioactive seed migration after prostate brachytherapy with iodine-125 using loose seeds versus stranded seeds

OBJECTIVES

To assess the incidence and clinical parameters that could influence migration of seeds in localized prostate cancer patients treated by stranded versus loose sources by Iodine-125 brachytherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

100 patients were treated from January/1998 until December/2006. Age, PSA, clinical stage, Gleason, prostate volume, number of seeds, activity of radioactive seeds, and dosimetric parameters, such as V100, V150 and D90 were evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 79 months (18 - 120. CI 95%: 72 - 85). Overall, 6 of 100 patients experienced seed migration. Seed migration was found in 4/50 (8%) patients using loose seeds and in 2/50 (4%) treated by stranded seeds. Mean value dosimetric parameters for stranded seeds were greater than those for loose seeds (V100(%): 88.7/82, D90(Gy): 149.2/140.3, D90(%): 104.2/93.8, V150 (%): 53.8/47, respectively). No significant difference in migration of seeds was detected between loose and stranded seeds considering age (p = 0.33), PSA (p = 0.391), prostate volume (p = 0.397), activity of radioactive seeds (p = 0.109), number of seeds (p = 0.338), V100 (p = 0.332), although significant differences were measured in the values of D90(% and Gy) (p = 0.022 and 0.011) and V150 (p = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

Seed migration after brachytherapy might occur and it does affect post-implant dosimetry.

Exploring the potential of mixed-source brachytherapy for the treatment of cervical cancer using high-dose rate 192Ir and/or 50 kV electronic sources

PURPOSE

In this study, computer modeling was used to compare the relative doses with the bladder, rectum, and bowel when two different brachytherapy modalities were used to treat cervical cancer with a tandem and ovoid applicator. A standard high-dose rate (HDR) (192)Ir treatment plan was compared with a "mixed-source" brachytherapy (MSB) treatment plan in which a 50 kV electronic brachytherapy X-ray source was substituted for (192)Ir as the tandem source.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 15 three-dimensional CT data sets from cervical cancer patients previously treated with tandem and ovoid applicator were evaluated for the study. Bladder, rectum, bowel, and target volumes were contoured and separate treatment plans were created for MSB and HDR (192)Ir applications. Dose-volume histograms were analyzed for each organ at risk.

RESULTS

The mean %V(25) for the bladder was 43% vs. 70% for MSB and HDR (192)Ir methods, respectively. Similarly, for the rectum mean %V(25) was 34% vs. 48% for MSB and HDR (192)Ir. For the bowel, the mean %V(25) was 28% vs. 43% for the MSB and HDR (192)Ir methods, respectively. In 16 of 45 organs at risk, %D(2 cc) values were higher for MSB than HDR (192)Ir.

CONCLUSIONS

MSB is capable of providing target coverage to the cervix, uterus, and paracervical regions equivalent to that provided by HDR (192)Ir, while significantly reducing the overall dose to the bladder, rectum, and bowel. This reduction is associated with small regions of increased dose in a significant proportion of patients.

[Which modality for prostate brachytherapy?]

Brachytherapy techniques by permanent implant of radioactive sources or by temporary high-dose-rate (HDR) fractions are nowadays extensively used for the treatment of prostatic carcinoma. Long-term results (at 20 years) concerning large amount of patients have been published by major centers confirming both in terms of efficacy and toxicities that permanent implant of radioactive iodine-125 seeds yields at least the same good results of surgery and of external beam irradiation when proposed to patients affected by low-risk disease. For intermediate to high-risk tumors, HDR temporary implants are proposed as a boost for dose escalation. For both techniques, several topics still need to be clarified dealing with a recent enlargement of indications (HDR alone for low-risk, iodine-125 seeds boost for intermediate-high-risk cancers), or with technical aspects (loose seeds versus linked ones, number of fractions and dose for HDR protocols), while dosimetric issues have only recently been addressed by cooperatives groups. Last but not least, there is a real need to address and clearly characterize the correct definition of biochemical disease control both for iodine permanent implant and for HDR implant. New challenges are facing the prostate-brachytherapy community in the near future: local relapse after external beam radiotherapy are currently managed by several salvage treatments (prostatectomy, cryo, high intensity focused ultrasounds [HIFU]) but the role of reirradiation by brachytherapy is also actively investigated. Focal therapy has gained considerable interest in the last 5 years aiming at treating only the area of cancer foci inside the prostate and preserving nearby healthy tissues. Encouraging results have been obtained with the so-called "minimally invasive" approaches and both permanent seed implantation and HDR brachytherapy techniques may be worthwhile testing in this setting because of their capability of exactly sculpting the dose inside the prostatic gland.

Localized prostate cancer with intermediate- or high-risk features treated with combined external beam radiotherapy and iodine-125 seed brachytherapy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to compare the results of the combined external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with iodine-125 seed brachytherapy vs. brachytherapy alone for prostate cancer treatment in patients with intermediate and high risk of disease recurrence.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ninety-six patients were treated from January 1998 to December 2006. Twenty-four patients received combined treatment and 72 patients received brachytherapy alone. Patients were classified into intermediate or high risk of recurrence according to the D'Amico's classification. The prescribed dose for brachytherapy was 145Gy as monotherapy and 110Gy for combined treatment. The dose of EBRT was 45Gy over 5 weeks, with 1.8Gy daily fractions. Results were analyzed based on Phoenix definition of biochemical recurrence, that is, nadir plus 2ng/mL.

RESULTS

Biochemical control was achieved by 96% (23 of 24) of patients receiving combined treatment and by 72% (52 of 72) in the group treated by brachytherapy alone (p<0.015). The addition of EBRT resulted in a 94% biochemical disease-free survival at 5 years; and in brachytherapy alone group, the rate was 54% (p<0.011). Mean followup was 96 months (24-132 months; confidence interval 95%: 90-102).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that in patients with localized prostate cancer, with intermediate and high risk of biochemical recurrence, the addition of EBRT can confer a significant biochemical control advantage when added to brachytherapy.

Acute urinary retention after I-125 prostate brachytherapy in relation to dose in different regions of the prostate

PURPOSE

To assess the influence of dose in different prostate regions, and the influence of anatomic variation on the risk of acute urinary retention (AUR) after I-125 prostate brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In this case-control study, dosimetry and anatomy were compared between 50 patients with AUR (cases) and 50 patients without AUR (controls). Cases and controls were randomly selected from our database. The following structures were delineated on magnetic resonance imaging: prostate, urethra, peripheral zone, transitional zone, apex, base, midprostate, lower sphincter, and bladder neck. The dosimetric parameters analyzed were D(10), D(50), D(90), V(100), V(150), and V(200). The anatomic parameters analyzed were prostate protrusion into the bladder, bladder overlap, urethra angle, and urethra-bladder angle. The delineator was blinded to the patient's AUR status. Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the association of these factors with AUR.

RESULTS

The dose delivered to different regions of the prostate was not significantly associated with the risk of AUR. Only dose to the bladder neck was significantly associated with AUR (odds ratio 1.13 per 10 Gy; 95% CI 1.02;1.26; p = 0.023). Mean bladder neck D(90) was 65 Gy in AUR cases vs. 56 Gy in controls (p = 0.016), and mean bladder neck D(10) was 128 Gy vs. 107 Gy, respectively (p = 0.018). Furthermore, on univariate analysis, a larger extent of both bladder overlap and of prostate protrusion were associated with a higher risk of AUR (odds ratio 1.16; 95% CI 1.04-1.28; p = 0.005, and odds ratio 1.83; 95% CI 1.37-2.45; p < 0.001, respectively). The mean extent of prostate protrusion was 3.5 mm in AUR cases vs. 1.0 mm in controls (p < 0.001). Odds ratios did not change substantially after adjustment for potential confounders. On multivariate analysis, the extent of prostate protrusion seemed to be a stronger risk factor for AUR than bladder overlap.

CONCLUSION

The risk of AUR is not associated with dose delivered to different regions of the prostate. However, a higher dose to the bladder neck and a larger extent of prostate protrusion into the bladder are risk factors for the development of AUR after I-125 prostate brachytherapy.

AAPM recommendations on dose prescription and reporting methods for permanent interstitial brachytherapy for prostate cancer: report of Task Group 137

During the past decade, permanent radioactive source implantation of the prostate has become the standard of care for selected prostate cancer patients, and the techniques for implantation have evolved in many different forms. Although most implants use 125I or 103Pd sources, clinical use of 131Cs sources has also recently been introduced. These sources produce different dose distributions and irradiate the tumors at different dose rates. Ultrasound was used originally to guide the planning and implantation of sources in the tumor. More recently, CT and/or MR are used routinely in many clinics for dose evaluation and planning. Several investigators reported that the tumor volumes and target volumes delineated from ultrasound, CT, and MR can vary substantially because of the inherent differences in these imaging modalities. It has also been reported that these volumes depend critically on the time of imaging after the implant. Many clinics, in particular those using intraoperative implantation, perform imaging only on the day of the implant. Because the effects of edema caused by surgical trauma can vary from one patient to another and resolve at different rates, the timing of imaging for dosimetry evaluation can have a profound effect on the dose reported (to have been delivered), i.e., for the same implant (same dose delivered), CT at different timing can yield different doses reported. Also, many different loading patterns and margins around the tumor volumes have been used, and these may lead to variations in the dose delivered. In this report, the current literature on these issues is reviewed, and the impact of these issues on the radiobiological response is estimated. The radiobiological models for the biological equivalent dose (BED) are reviewed. Starting with the BED model for acute single doses, the models for fractionated doses, continuous low-dose-rate irradiation, and both homogeneous and inhomogeneous dose distributions, as well as tumor cure probability models, are reviewed. Based on these developments in literature, the AAPM recommends guidelines for dose prescription from a physics perspective for routine patient treatment, clinical trials, and for treatment planning software developers. The authors continue to follow the current recommendations on using D90 and V100 as the primary quantitles, with more specific guidelines on the use of the imaging modalities and the timing of the imaging. The AAPM recommends that the postimplant evaluation should be performed at the optimum time for specific radionuclides. In addition, they encourage the use of a radiobiological model with a specific set of parameters to facilitate relative comparisons of treatment plans reported by different institutions using different loading patterns or radionuclides.

Rectal morbidity after permanent interstitial brachytherapy for prostate cancer--impact of day 1 vs. day 30 computed tomography-based postimplant dosimetry

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to evaluate bowel quality-of-life changes after prostate brachytherapy and the impact of Day 1 vs. Day 30 postimplant dosimetry.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In 61 patients, computed tomography (CT) scans were performed at Days 1 and 30 after (125)I brachytherapy. The patients have been surveyed prospectively before (time A), 1 month (time B), and >1 year after treatment (time C) using a validated questionnaire (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite). Different parameters were tested for their predictive value on bowel quality-of-life changes (bowel bother score decrease >20 points at time B=BB20; bowel bother score decrease >10 points at time C=BC10), including seed displacements.

RESULTS

Mean bowel function/bother score decreased 13/13 points at time B (p<0.01) and 1/4 points at time C (change not significant). BB20 and BC10 were found in 25% and 20% of patients, respectively. Bowel bother score declines at time B correlated well with declines at time C (r=0.53; p<0.01). Prostate volume before implantation and the number of seeds per cubic centimeters were found to be predictive for BB20 and BC10. Smaller rectal wall volumes covered by the 60-100% isodoses at Day 1 were (paradoxically) found to be significantly predictive for BC10. Larger posterior seed displacements between Days 1 and 30 were significantly associated with BB20.

CONCLUSIONS

Quality-of-life scores have not been found to change significantly >1 year after brachytherapy. Larger rectal wall volumes within higher isodoses at Day 1 or 30 were not found to be predisposing for adverse quality-of-life changes.

In vivo dosimetry with a linear MOSFET array to evaluate the urethra dose during permanent implant brachytherapy using iodine-125

PURPOSE

To develop a technique to monitor the dose rate in the urethra during permanent implant brachytherapy using a linear MOSFET array, with sufficient accuracy and without significantly extending the implantation time.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Phantom measurements were performed to determine the optimal conditions for clinical measurements. In vivo measurements were performed in 5 patients during the (125)I brachytherapy implant procedure. To evaluate if the urethra dose obtained in the operating room with the ultrasound transducer in the rectum and the patient in treatment position is a reference for the total accumulated dose; additional measurements were performed after the implantation procedure, in the recovery room.

RESULTS

In vivo measurements during and after the implantation procedure agree very well, illustrating that the ultrasound transducer in the rectum and patient positioning do not influence the measured dose in the urethra. In vivo dose values obtained during the implantation are therefore representative for the total accumulated dose in the urethra. In 5 patients, the dose rates during and after the implantation were below the maximum dose rate of the urethra, using the planned seed distribution.

CONCLUSION

In vivo dosimetry during the implantation, using a MOSFET array, is a feasible technique to evaluate the dose in the urethra during the implantation of (125)I seeds for prostate brachytherapy.

Critical discussion of different dose-volume parameters for rectum and urethra in prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To compare different dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameter concepts used for rectum and urethra.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty-eight postplan CT scans were used to contour the rectum with only one outer contour and as a wall structure. DVH analysis included dose to absolute and relative volumes of both contour types, from RD(0.1cc) to RD(10cc) and from RDmax to RD30, respectively. Volume parameters are reported (RV50-RV300) in cubic centimeters and percentages. The analysis of urethral dose parameters was based on 55 CTs with a urethral catheter. Relative (UD100 to UDmax) and absolute volume parameters (UD(0.5cc) to UD(0.1cc), UV100, UV150) were evaluated, and also correlated to prostate parameters. The analysis was repeated for 10 MRI-based interstitial high-dose rate cases.

RESULTS

The correlation between organ and wall results was high for RD1, RD(2cc), and RD(0.1cc), with differences of <5%. DVH parameters reporting dose to a relative volume (e.g., RD10) or a relative volume related to a certain dose (e.g., RV100 [%]) are sensitive to the number of contoured slices. Dmax has a high uncertainty due to the sampling algorithm. RV100 (145Gy) of 1.5cc is similar to an RD(2cc) of 130Gy. The urethral UD10 and UD(0.1cc) correlate with a mean difference of 1%. The ratios of UD5/UD30, UD10/UD30, and UD5/UD10 were 1.12, 1.09, and 1.03, respectively. The correlation between D90 and D10 for prostate to urethra UD10 was poor.

CONCLUSIONS

Only absolute volume parameters are stable in relation to different contouring concepts. When delineating the outer rectum contour, only RD(2cc) and RD(0.1cc) can be used. RV(100) in cc correlates to RD(2cc). Reporting UD5, UD10, and UD30 together is redundant. Additional information is given when reporting UV100 or UV150.

Monte Carlo simulation of a realistic anatomical phantom described by triangle meshes: application to prostate brachytherapy imaging

PURPOSE

Monte Carlo codes can simulate the transport of radiation within matter with high accuracy and can be used to study medical applications of ionising radiations. The aim of our work was to develop a Monte Carlo code capable of generating projection images of the human body. In order to obtain clinically realistic images a detailed anthropomorphic phantom was prepared. These two simulation tools are intended to study the multiple applications of imaging in radiotherapy, from image guided treatments to portal imaging.

METHODS

We adapted the general-purpose code PENELOPE 2006 to simulate a radiation source, an ideal digital detector, and a realistic model of the patient anatomy. The anthropomorphic phantom was developed using computer-aided design tools, and is based on the NCAT phantom. The surface of each organ is modelled using a closed triangle mesh, and the full phantom contains 330 organs and more than 5 million triangles. A novel object-oriented geometry package, which includes an octree structure to sort the triangles, has been developed to use this complex geometry with PENELOPE.

RESULTS

As an example of the capabilities of the new code, projection images of the human pelvis region were simulated. Radioactive seeds were included inside the phantom's prostate. Therefore, the resulting simulated images resemble what would be obtained in a clinical procedure to assess the positioning of the seeds in a prostate brachytherapy treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The new code can produce projection images of the human body that are comparable to those obtained by a real imaging system (within the limitations of the anatomical phantom and the detector model). The simulated images can be used to study and optimise an imaging task (i.e., maximise the object detectability, minimise the delivered dose, find the optimum beam energy, etc.). Since PENELOPE can simulate radiation from 50 eV to 1 GeV, the code can also be used to simulate radiotherapy treatments and portal imaging. Using the octree data structure, the new geometry model does not significantly increase the computing time when compared to the simulation of a much simpler quadric geometry. In conclusion, we have shown that it is feasible to use PENELOPE and a complex triangle mesh geometry to simulate real medical physics applications.