Prostate target volume variations during a course of radiotherapy

Positioning errors and prostate motion during conformal prostate radiotherapy using on-line isocentre set-up verification and implanted prostate markers

PURPOSE

To evaluate treatment errors from set-up and inter-fraction prostatic motion with port films and implanted prostate fiducial markers during conformal radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

Errors from isocentre positioning and inter-fraction prostate motion were investigated in 13 men treated with escalated dose conformal radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. To limit the effect of inter-fraction prostate motion, patients were planned and treated with an empty rectum and a comfortably full bladder, and were instructed regarding dietary management, fluid intake and laxative use. Field placement was determined and corrected with daily on-line portal imaging. A lateral portal film was taken three times weekly over the course of therapy. From these films, random and systematic placement errors were measured by matching corresponding bony landmarks to the simulator film. Superior-inferior and anterior-posterior prostate motion was measured from the displacement of three gold pins implanted into the prostate before planning. A planning target volume (PTV) was derived to account for the measured prostate motion and field placement errors.

RESULTS

From 272 port films the random and systematic isocentre positioning error was 2.2 mm (range 0.2-7.3 mm) and 1.4 mm (range 0.2-3.3 mm), respectively. Prostate motion was largest at the base compared to the apex. Base: anterior, standard deviation (SD) 2.9 mm; superior, SD 2.1 mm. Apex: anterior, SD 2.1 mm; superior, SD 2.1 mm. The margin of PTV required to give a 99% probability of the gland remaining within the 95% isodose line during the course of therapy is superior 5.8 mm, and inferior 5.6 mm. In the anterior and posterior direction, this margin is 7.2 mm at the base, 6.5 mm at the mid-gland and 6.0 mm at the apex.

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic set-up errors were small using real-time isocentre placement corrections. Patient instruction to help control variation in bladder and rectal distension during therapy may explain the observed small SD for prostate motion in this group of patients. Inter-fraction prostate motion remained the largest source of treatment error, and observed motion was greatest at the gland base. In the absence of real-time pre-treatment imaging of prostate position, sequential portal films of implanted prostatic markers should improve quality assurance by confirming organ position within the treatment field over the course of therapy.

[Physical and methodological aspects of multimodality imaging and principles of treatment planning in 3D conformal radiotherapy]

The recent evolutions of the imaging modalities, the dose calculation models, the linear accelerators and the portal imaging permit to improve the quality of the conformal radiation therapy treatment planning. With DICOM protocols, the acquired imaging data coming from different modalities are treated by performant image fusion algorithms and yield more precise target volumes and organs at risk. The transformation of the clinical target volumes (CTV) to planning target volumes (PTV) can be realised using advanced probabilistic techniques based on clinical experience. The treatment plans evaluation is based on the dose volume histograms. Their precision and clinical relevance are improved by the multi-modality imaging and the advanced dose calculation models. The introduction of the inverse planning systems permitting to realise modulated intensity radiation therapy generates highly conformal dose distributions. All the previously cited complex techniques require the application of rigorous quality assurance programs.

[Definition of volumes in external radiotherapy: ICRU reports 50 and 62]

Prescribing and achieving radiotherapy require accurate definitions of the target volumes and of the dose to be delivered in them. The need for the availability of a coherent vocabulary, recognized from local to international levels, has justified the publication, by the ICRU, of two reports related to external radiotherapy, the Report 50 (1993) and the Report 62 (1999). This paper presents the main propositions of the ICRU for the definition of the volumes, as well as comments and recommendations for their use.

Organ motion and its management

PURPOSE

To compile and review data on the topic of organ motion and its management.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data were classified into three categories: (a) patient position-related organ motion, (b) interfraction organ motion, and (c) intrafraction organ motion. Data on interfraction motion of gynecological tumors, the prostate, bladder, and rectum are reviewed. Literature pertaining to the intrafraction movement of the liver, diaphragm, kidneys, pancreas, lung tumors, and prostate is compiled. Methods for managing interfraction and intrafraction organ motion in radiation therapy are also reviewed.

Rectal sequelae after conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer: dose-volume histograms as predictive factors

PURPOSE

To identify clinically relevant parameters predictive of late rectal bleeding derived from cumulative dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the rectum after conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and nine patients treated with 3D conformal radiotherapy between 1/1994 and 1/1996 for localized prostate cancer (clinical stage T1-T3) were available for analysis. All patients received a total dose of 66 Gy/2 Gy per fraction (specified at the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements ICRU reference point). DVHs of the contoured rectum were analyzed by defining the absolute (aV) and relative (rV) rectum volume that received more than 30% (V30), 50% (V50), 70% (V70), 80% (V80), 90% (V90) and 100% (V100) of the prescribed dose. Additionally, a new aspect of DVH analysis was investigated by calculation of the area under the DVH-curve between several dose levels (area under the curve (AUC)-DVH). DVH-variables were correlated with radiation side effects evaluated in 3-6 months intervals and graded according to the EORTC/RTOG score. The median follow-up was 30 months (12-60 months).

RESULTS

Univariate and multivariate stepwise Cox-Regression analysis including age, PTV, rectum size, rV100, rV90, rV80, rV70, rV50 rV30 and aV30 to aV100 were calculated. Late rectal bleeding (EORTC/RTOG grade 2) was significantly correlated with the percentage of rectum volume receiving > or = 90% of the prescribed dose (rV90) (P = 0.007) and inversely correlated in a significant way with the size of contoured rectum (P = 0.006) in multivariate analysis. In our series, a proportion of the rectum volume > or = 57% were included in the 90%-isodose (rV90 > or = 57%) in one half of the patients, with an actuarial incidence of 31% of late rectal bleeding at 3 years. In the other half of the patients, when rV90 < 57%, the 3-year actuarial incidence was 11% (P < 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate a dose-volume relationship at the reference dose of 60 Gy ( approximately 90% of the prescribed dose) with respect to late rectal toxicity. The rV90 seems to be the most useful and easily obtained parameter when comparing treatment plans to evaluate the risk of rectal morbidity.

Portal imaging for evaluation of daily on-line setup errors and off-line organ motion during conformal irradiation of carcinoma of the prostate

PURPOSE

To use portal imaging to measure daily on-line setup error and off-line prostatic motion in patients treated with conformal radiotherapy to determine an optimum planning target volume (PTV) margin incorporating both setup error and organ motion.

RESULTS

A total of 2549 portal images from 33 patients were acquired over the course of the study. Of these patients, 23 were analyzed for setup errors while the remaining 10 were analyzed for prostatic motion. Setup errors were characterized by standard deviations of 1.8 mm in the anterior-posterior (AP) direction and 1.4 mm in the superior-inferior (SI) direction. Displacements due to prostatic motion, with standard deviations of 5.8 mm AP and 3.3 mm SI, were found to be more significant than setup errors.

CONCLUSIONS

Taking into account both setup errors and target organ motion, optimum PTV margins to ensure 95% coverage are 10.0 mm AP and 5.9 mm SI. The portal imaging protocol established in this study allows radiation therapists to accept or adjust a treatment setup based upon daily on-line image matching results. The successful localization of radiopaque fiducial markers on a significant number of portal images acquired in the study gives hope that more accurate on-line targeting verification may soon be possible through the visualization of the prostate itself as opposed to the surrounding bony structures of the pelvis.

Development of a treatment planning protocol for prostate treatments using intensity modulated radiotherapy

We have developed a treatment planning protocol for intensity-modulated radiation therapy of the prostate using commercially available inverse planning software. Treatment plans were developed for ten patients using the Corvus version 3.8 planning system, testing various prescription options, including tissue types, dose volume histogram values for the target and normal structures, beam arrangements, and number of intensity levels. All plans were scaled so that 95% of the clinical target volume received 75.6 Gy; mean doses to the prostate were typically 79 Gy. The reproducibility of the inverse planning algorithm was tested by repeating a set of the plans five times. Plans were deemed acceptable if they satisfied predefined dose constraints for the targets and critical organs. Figures of merit for target coverage, target dose uniformity, and organ sparing were used to rank acceptable plans. Certain systematic behaviors of the optimizer were noted: the high dose regions for both targets and critical organs were 5-10 Gy more than prescribed; reducing bladder and rectum tolerance increased the range of doses within the target; increasing the number of fields incrementally improved plan quality. A set of planning parameters was found that usually satisfied the minimum requirements. Repeating the optimization with different beam order produced similar but slightly different dose distributions, which was sometimes useful for finding acceptable solutions for difficult cases. The standard set of parameters serves as a useful starting point for individualized planning.

Considerations for the implementation of target volume protocols in radiation therapy

PURPOSE

Uncertainties in patient repositioning and organ motion are accounted for by defining a planning target volume (PTV). We make recommendations on issues not explicitly discussed in existing protocols for PTV design.

METHODS

A quantity called "coverage" is defined to quantify how effectively a PTV encompasses the clinical target volume, and is applied to examine the impact of several factors. A stochastic simulation is used to determine the coverage required for a desirable balance between tumor control probability (TCP) and the irradiated volume. Using a sample anatomy, we assess the importance of the method used to add uncertainties, the shape of the uncertainty distribution, the effect of systematic uncertainties, and the use of nonuniform margins. Additionally, we examine the benefit of patient immobilization techniques.

RESULTS

Our example indicates that 95% coverage is a reasonable goal for treatment planning. Using this as a comparison value, our example indicates quadrature addition of uncertainties predicts smaller margins (7 mm) than linear addition (11 mm), Gaussian distribution of uncertainties (7 mm) require the same margin as a uniform distribution (7 mm), systematic uncertainties have a small effect on TCP below a threshold value (4 mm), and nonuniform margins allow only a slight reduction of irradiated volume.

CONCLUSION

We recommend that uncertainties should generally be added in quadrature, the exact shape of the uncertainty distribution is not critical, systematic uncertainties should be maintained below some threshold value, and nonuniform margins may be effective when uncertainties are anisotropic.

Stereotactic radiotherapy of extracranial targets: CT-simulation and accuracy of treatment in the stereotactic body frame

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Evaluation of set-up accuracy and analysis of target reproducibility in the stereotactic body frame (SBF), designed by Blomgren and Lax from Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm. Different types of targets were analyzed for the risk of target deviation. The correlation of target deviation to bony structures was analyzed to evaluate the value of bones as reference structures for isocenter verification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty patients with 32 targets were treated in the SBF for primary or metastatic peripheral lung cancer, liver metastases, abdominal and pelvic tumor recurrences or bone metastases. Set-up accuracy and target mobility were evaluated by CT-simulation and port films. The contours of the target at isocenter level, bony structures and body outline were compared by matching the CT-slices for treatment planning and simulation using the stereotactic coordinates of the SBF as external reference system. The matching procedure was performed by using a 3D treatment planning program.

RESULTS

Set-up accuracy represented by bony structures revealed standard deviations (SD) of 3.5 mm in longitudinal, 2.2 mm in anterior-posterior and 3.9 mm in lateral directions. Target reproducibility showed a SD of 4.4 mm in longitudinal, 3.4 mm ap and 3.3 mm in lateral direction prior to correction. Correlation of target deviation to bones ranged from 33% (soft tissue targets) to 100% (bones).

CONCLUSION

A security margin of 5 mm for PTV definition is sufficient, if CT simulation is performed prior to each treatment to correct larger target deviations or set-up errors. Isocenter verification relative to bony structures is only safe for bony targets but not for soft tissue targets.

A clinical evaluation of setup errors for a prostate immobilization system

A prostate treatment immobilization system was evaluated with respect to setup errors and efficiency for a specific treatment setup. Prostate patients were treated in the prone position with a rectal catheter using the NOMOS intensity modulated radiotherapy system. Immobilization and setup consisted of a Vac-Loktrade mark bag (MED-TEC, Orange City, IO) fitted within a registration carrier box where patients were aligned to the bag using skin marks along the lower leg. Daily setup errors were analyzed using lateral portal films, registration plates mounted to the carrier box, and the pubic symphasis as a bony reference. Two studies were conducted to evaluate setup technique. In the first study, patient setup required 3-5 minutes for patient positioning and the corresponding superior/inferior errors were found to have a standard deviation of 3.5 mm. In the second study, the technique standards were reduced to allow for faster setup times and, consequently, larger errors; setup times were 1-2 minutes and the mean and standard deviation errors were approximately 2 and 5 mm, respectively.

Inverse planning incorporating organ motion

Accurate targeting is important in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The positional uncertainties of structures with respect to the external beams arise in part from random organ motion and patient setup errors. While it is important to improve immobilization and reduce the influence of organ motion, the residual effects should be included in the IMRT plan design. Current inverse planning algorithms follow the conventional approach and include uncertainties by assuming population-based margins to the target and sensitive structures. Margin around a structure represents a "hard boundary" and the fact that a structure has a spatial probability distribution has been completely ignored. With increasing understanding of spatial uncertainties of structures and the technical capability of fine-tuning the dose distribution on an individual beamlet level in IMRT, it seems timely and important to fully utilize the information in the planning process. This will reduce the "effective" margins of the structures and facilitate dose escalation. Instead of specifying a "hard margin," we describe an inverse planning algorithm which takes into consideration positional uncertainty in terms of spatial probability distribution. The algorithm was demonstrated by assuming that the random organ motion can be represented by a three-dimensional Gaussian distribution function. Other probability distributions can be dealt with similarly. In particular, the commonly used "hard margin" is a special case of the current approach with a uniform probability distribution within a specified range. The algorithm was applied to plan treatment for a prostate case and a pancreatic case. The results were compared with those obtained by adding a margin to the clinical target volume. Better sparing of the sensitive structures were obtained in both cases using the proposed method for approximately the same target coverage.

Prostate position late in the course of external beam therapy: patterns and predictors

PURPOSE

To examine prostate and seminal vesicles position late in the course of radiation therapy and to determine the effect and predictive value of the bladder and rectum on prostate and seminal vesicles positioning.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-four patients with localized prostate cancer underwent a computerized tomography scan (CT1) before the start of radiation therapy. After 4-5 weeks of radiation therapy, a second CT scan (CT2) was obtained. All patients were scanned in the supine treatment position with instructions to maintain a full bladder. The prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, and rectum were contoured. CT2 was aligned via fixed bony anatomy to CT1. The geometrical center and volume of each structure were obtained and directly compared.

RESULTS

The prostate shifted along a diagonal axis extending from an anterior-superior position to a posterior-inferior position. The dominant shift was to a more posterior-inferior position. On average, bladder and rectal volumes decreased to 51% (+/-29%) and 82% (+/-45%) of their pretreatment values, respectively. Multiple regression analysis (MRA) revealed that bladder movement and volume change and upper rectum movement were independently associated with prostate motion (p = 0.016, p = 0. 003, and p = 0.052 respectively).

CONCLUSION

Patients are often instructed to maintain a full bladder during a course of external beam radiation therapy, in the hopes of decreasing bladder and small bowel toxicity. However, our study shows that large bladder volumes late in therapy are strongly associated with posterior prostate displacement. This prostate displacement may result in marginal miss.

Patient positioning in prostate radiotherapy: is prone better than supine?

PURPOSE

To assess potential dose reductions to the rectum and to the bladder with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) to the prostate in the prone as compared with the supine position; and to retrospectively evaluate treatment position reproducibility without immobilization devices.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eighteen patients with localized prostate cancer underwent pelvic CT scans and 3D treatment planning in prone and supine positions. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were constructed for the clinical target volume, the rectum and the bladder for every patient in both treatment positions. "Comparative DVHs" (cDVHs) were defined for the rectum and for the bladder: cDVH was obtained by subtracting the organ volume receiving a given dose increment in the prone position from the corresponding value in the supine position. These values were then integrated over the entire dose range. The prescribed dose to the planning target volume (PTV) was 74 Gy using a 6-field technique. To evaluate reproducibility, portal films were subsequently reviewed in 12 patients treated prone and 10 contemporary patients treated supine (controls). No immobilization devices were used. Deviations in the anterio-posterior (X) and cranio-caudal (Y) axes were measured. Mean treatment position variation, total setup variation, systematic setup variation, and random setup variation were obtained.

RESULTS

Prone position was associated with a higher dose to the rectum or to the bladder in 6 (33%) and 7 (39%) patients, respectively. A simultaneously higher dose to rectum and bladder was noted in 2 (11%) patients in prone and in 7 (39%) patients in supine. Rectal and bladder volumes were frequently larger in prone than in supine: mean prone/supine volume ratios were 1.21 (SD, 0.68) and 1.03 (SD, 1.32), respectively. In these cases cDVH analysis more often favored the prone position. Mean treatment position variation and total setup variation were similar for both prone and supine plans. A higher systematic setup variation was observed in prone positioning: 2.7 mm vs. 1.9 mm (X axis) and 4.1 mm vs. 2.2 mm (Y axis). The random variation was similar for both prone and supine: 4. 0 mm vs. 3.6 mm (X axis) and 3.7 mm vs. 3.6 mm (Y axis).

CONCLUSIONS

Prone position 3D-CRT is frequently, but not always, associated with an apparent dose reduction to the rectum and/or to the bladder for prostate cancer patients. As suggested by the increased mean prone/supine rectal volume ratio, the advantage of prone positioning for the rectum may be artifactual, at least partly reflecting a position-dependent rectal air volume, which may significantly vary from treatment to treatment. In the absence of immobilization devices, daily setup reproducibility appears less accurate for the prone position, primarily due to systematic setup variations.

Late rectal toxicity after conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer (I): multivariate analysis and dose-response

PURPOSE

The purpose of this paper is to use the outcome of a dose escalation protocol for three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) of prostate cancer to study the dose-response for late rectal toxicity and to identify anatomic, dosimetric, and clinical factors that correlate with late rectal bleeding in multivariate analysis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Seven hundred forty-three patients with T1c-T3 prostate cancer were treated with 3D-CRT with prescribed doses of 64.8 to 81.0 Gy. The 5-year actuarial rate of late rectal toxicity was assessed using Kaplan-Meier statistics. A retrospective dosimetric analysis was performed for patients treated to 70.2 Gy (52 patients) or 75.6 Gy (119 patients) who either exhibited late rectal bleeding (RTOG Grade 2/3) within 30 months after treatment (i.e., 70.2 Gy-13 patients, 75. 6 Gy-36 patients) or were nonbleeding for at least 30 months (i.e., 70.2 Gy-39 patients, 75.6 Gy-83 patients). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to correlate late rectal bleeding with several anatomic, dosimetric, and clinical variables.

RESULTS

A dose response for >/= Grade 2 late rectal toxicity was observed. By multivariate analysis, the following factors were significantly correlated with >/= Grade 2 late rectal bleeding for patients prescribed 70.2 Gy: 1) enclosure of the outer rectal contour by the 50% isodose on the isocenter slice (i.e., Iso50) (p < 0.02), and 2) smaller anatomically defined rectal wall volume (p < 0.05). After 75.6 Gy, the following factors were significant: 1) smaller anatomically defined rectal wall volume (p < 0.01), 2) higher rectal D(max) (p < 0.01), 3) enclosure of rectal contour by Iso50 (p < 0.01), 4) patient age (p = 0.02), and 5) history of diabetes mellitus (p = 0.04). In addition to these five factors, acute rectal toxicity was also significantly correlated (p = 0.05) with late rectal bleeding when patients from both dose groups were combined in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

A multivariate logistic regression model is presented which describes the probability of developing late rectal bleeding after conformal irradiation of prostate cancer. Late rectal bleeding correlated with factors which may indicate that a greater fractional volume of rectal wall was exposed to high dose, such as smaller rectal wall volume, inclusion of the rectum within the 50% isodose on the isocenter slice, and higher rectal D(max).

Effects of urethrography on prostate position: considerations for radiotherapy treatment planning of prostate carcinoma

PURPOSE

Retrograde urethrography is commonly used to define the prostate apex at simulation. This study evaluated the hypothesis that urethrography causes prostate displacement, resulting in an error in treatment planning.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty-five patients with carcinoma of the prostate were evaluated. Gold seeds were placed in the apex, posterior wall, and base of the gland. In the first 20 patients, the position of the seed-defined apex was compared at simulation (with urethrogram) and on day 1 of treatment (without urethrogram). In the second cohort of 25 patients, the effects of urethrography on prostate position were evaluated directly at simulation by comparing the position of apex pre- and post-urethrography. An analysis was performed to estimate the possible impact of urethrogram-induced prostate motion on target coverage.

RESULTS

The mean superior displacement in the first and second cohort was 5.2 mm and 6.8 mm, respectively (combined mean shift 6.1 mm). With a 10-mm field margin below the tip of the urethrogram cone, 56% of patients in this study would have inadequate planning target volume (PTV) coverage.

CONCLUSION

Retrograde urethrography causes a significant superior shift of the prostate. Strict reliance on urethrography in determining the inferior field margin could result in inadequate treatment.

Planning target volumes for radiotherapy: how much margin is needed?

PURPOSE

The radiotherapy planning target volume (PTV) encloses the clinical target volume (CTV) with anisotropic margins to account for possible uncertainties in beam alignment, patient positioning, organ motion, and organ deformation. Ideally, the CTV-PTV margin should be determined solely by the magnitudes of the uncertainties involved. In practice, the clinician usually also considers doses to abutting healthy tissues when deciding on the size of the CTV-PTV margin. This study calculates the ideal size of the CTV-PTV margin when only physical position uncertainties are considered.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The position of the CTV for any treatment is assumed to be described by independent Gaussian distributions in each of the three Cartesian directions. Three strategies for choosing a CTV-PTV margin are analyzed. The CTV-PTV margin can be based on: 1. the probability that the CTV is completely enclosed by the PTV; 2. the probability that the projection of the CTV in the beam's eye view (BEV) is completely enclosed by the projection of the PTV in the BEV; and 3. the probability that a point on the edge of the CTV is within the PTV. Cumulative probability distributions are derived for each of the above strategies.

RESULTS

Expansion of the CTV by 1 standard deviation (SD) in each direction results in the CTV being entirely enclosed within the PTV 24% of the time; the BEV projection of the CTV is enclosed within the BEV projection of the PTV 39% of the time; and a point on the edge of the CTV is within the PTV 84% of the time. To have the CTV enclosed entirely within the PTV 95% of the time requires a margin of 2.8 SD. For the BEV projection of the CTV to be within the BEV projection of the PTV 95% of the time requires a margin of 2.45 SD. To have any point on the surface of the CTV be within the PTV 95% of the time requires a margin of 1.65 SD.

CONCLUSION

In the first two strategies for selecting a margin, the probability of finding the CTV within the PTV is unrelated to dose variations in the CTV. In the third strategy, the specified confidence limit is correlated with the minimum target dose. We recommend that the PTV be calculated from the CTV using a margin of 1.65 SD in each direction. This gives a minimum CTV dose that is greater than 95% of the minimum PTV dose. Additional sparing of adjoining healthy structures should be accomplished by modifying beam portals, rather than adjusting the PTV. Then, the dose distributions more accurately reflect the clinical compromise between treating the tumor and sparing the patient.

Animation and radiobiological analysis of 3D motion in conformal radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To allow treatment plans to be evaluated against the range of expected organ motion and set up error anticipated during treatment.

METHODS

Planning tools have been developed to allow concurrent animation and radiobiological analysis of three dimensional (3D) target and organ motion in conformal radiotherapy. Surfaces fitted to structures outlined on CT studies are projected onto pre-treatment images or onto megavoltage images collected during the patient treatment. Visual simulation of tumour and normal tissue movement is then performed by the application of three dimensional affine transformations, to the selected surface. Concurrent registration of the surface motion with the 3D dose distribution allows calculation of the change in dose to the volume. Realistic patterns of motion can be applied to the structure to simulate inter-fraction motion and set-up error. The biologically effective dose for the structure is calculated for each fraction as the surface moves over the course of the treatment and is used to calculate the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) or tumour control probability (TCP) for the moving structure. The tool has been used to evaluate conformal therapy plans against set up measurements recorded during patient treatments. NTCP and TCP were calculated for a patient whose set up had been corrected after systematic deviations from plan geometry were measured during treatment, the effect of not making the correction were also assessed.

RESULTS

TCP for the moving tumour was reduced if inadequate margins were set for the treatment. Modelling suggests that smaller margins could have been set for the set up corrected during the course of the treatment. The NTCP for the rectum was also higher for the uncorrected set up due to a more rectal tissue falling in the high dose region.

CONCLUSION

This approach provides a simple way for clinical users to utilise information incrementally collected throughout the whole of a patient's treatment. In particular it is possible to test the robustness of a patient plan against a range of possible motion patterns. The methods described represent a move from the inspection of static pre-treatment plans to a review of the dynamic treatment.