Role of protein kinase C phosphorylation in rapid desensitization of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5

Switch from facilitation to inhibition of excitatory synaptic transmission by group I mGluR desensitization

We have explored whether the desensitization of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) coupled to phosphoinositide hydrolysis affects the role that they play in modulating glutamate release. In hippocampal nerve terminals, the agonist 3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine (DHPG) facilitated evoked glutamate release, but a second stimulation 5 min later reduced rather than facilitated release. After a 30 min interval between stimulations, DHPG again facilitated glutamate release. In hippocampal slices, DHPG caused an inhibition of excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) recorded from CA1 neurons. However, when the effects of ambient glutamate were prevented, mGluR activation initially induced a facilitation of synaptic transmission, followed by an inhibition. We conclude that group I mGluRs have a dual action on glutamate release, switching from facilitatory to inhibitory upon receptor desensitization triggered by low concentrations of glutamate.

Evidence that the nucleotide exchange and hydrolysis cycle of G proteins causes acute desensitization of G-protein gated inward rectifier K+ channels

The G-protein gated inward rectifier K+ channel (GIRK) is activated in vivo by the Gbeta gamma subunits liberated upon Gi-coupled receptor activation. We have recapitulated the acute desensitization of receptor-activated GIRK currents in heterologous systems and shown that it is a membrane-delimited process. Its kinetics depends on the guanine nucleotide species available and could be accounted for by the nucleotide exchange and hydrolysis cycle of G proteins. Indeed, acute desensitization is abolished by nonhydrolyzable GTP analogues. Whereas regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins by their GTPase-activating protein activities are regarded as negative regulators, a positive regulatory function of RGS4 is uncovered in our study; the opposing effects allow RGS4 to potentiate acute desensitization without compromising GIRK activation.

Protein kinase C and A3 adenosine receptor activation inhibit presynaptic metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) function and uncouple mGluRs from GTP-binding proteins

One of the most prominent roles of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) in the CNS is to serve as presynaptic receptors that inhibit transmission at glutamatergic synapses. Previous reports suggest that the presynaptic effect of group II mGluRs at corticostriatal synapses can be inhibited by activators of protein kinase C (PKC). We now report that activation of PKC inhibits the ability of group II and group III mGluRs to regulate transmission at three major synapses in the hippocampal formation. Thus, this effect may be a widespread phenomenon that occurs at glutamatergic synapses throughout the CNS. We also report that this response is not limited to PKC-activating phorbol esters but that activation of A3 adenosine receptors induces a PKC-dependent inhibition of group III mGluR function at the Schaffer collateral-CA1 synapse. In addition to inhibiting mGluR modulation of excitatory synaptic transmission, we found that activation of PKC reduces inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation by group II and group III mGluRs, suggesting that the effect of PKC on mGluR signaling is not specific to their effects on neurotransmitter release. This led us to test the hypothesis that PKC acts upstream from effector proteins regulated by mGluRs and acts at the level of the receptor or GTP-binding protein. Interestingly, we found that PKC inhibited mGluR-induced increases in [35S]-GTPgammaS binding in cortical synaptosomes. These data suggest that PKC-induced inhibition of mGluR signaling may be mediated by the inhibition of coupling of mGluRs to GTP-binding proteins.

The activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors protects nerve cells from oxidative stress

Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) have been implicated in a variety of cellular responses to glutamic acid. The work described in this manuscript extends the role of mGluRs to include protection from oxidative stress-induced programmed cell death. Glutamate analogs regulate inositol-1,4,5 triphosphate mass accumulation in accordance with their ability to protect cells from oxidative glutamate toxicity, and protection appears to take place at the level of glutathione metabolism. Short-term exposure of cells to low concentrations of glutamate desensitizes cells to a subsequent challenge from glutamate. Glutamate exposure upregulates the expression of mGluR5 in hippocampal HT-22 cells and mGluR1 in cortical primary cultures. Finally, group I mGluR agonists also protect cells from death programs initiated by glucose starvation and cystine deprivation.

Direct effects of metabotropic glutamate receptor compounds on native and recombinant N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors

The actions of glutamate in the central nervous system are mediated through interaction with fast activating ionotropic receptors and G protein-coupled metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs). Studies of these receptors have relied on the availability of agonists and antagonists selective for each receptor class. Compounds that were thought to be selective for mGluRs have been extensively used to study the role of these receptors in the brain. Their use has implicated mGluRs in a wide range of physiological and pathological processes including the modulation of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors and NMDA receptor-dependent processes. We report that some of the most commonly used mGluR compounds act as antagonists on NMDA receptors at concentrations commonly used to activate or block mGluRs. In addition, several of the drugs also act as agonists at higher concentrations due at least in part to high levels of contaminant amino acids. Our results indicate that caution should be used when using these drugs to study the roles of mGluRs in various NMDA-dependent processes. The antagonist effects were dependent on the concentration of the NMDA receptor coagonists, preventing reappraisal of previously published work.