Humoral theory of transplantation

Long-term follow-up of non-HLA and anti-HLA antibodies: incidence and importance in renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Detection of antibody-mediated injury is becoming increasingly important in post-transplant patient care. The role of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in kidney transplant damage is known, whereas the significance of non-HLA antibodies remains an unresolved concern. The aim of the study was to determine the presence and influence on renal function of non-HLA and anti-HLA antibodies in stable patients at 5 years after kidney transplantation.

METHODS

We evaluated the antibodies in 35 consecutive patients with stable renal function at 5 years after transplantation.

RESULTS

Pretransplant screening for donor-specific antibodies by CDC cross-matches was negative in all patients. Anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECA), anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (anti-AT1R), and anti-endothelin receptor antibodies (anti-ETAR) were assayed as non-HLA antibodies. Non-HLA antibodies were observed in 12 (34%) patients, including AECA (n = 5; 14%), anti- AT1R (n = 6; 17%), anti-ETAR (n = 4; 11%), and both anti-AT1R and anti-ETAR (n = 3). Among 13 (37%) patients with anti-HLA antibodies, 7 also had both non-HLA antibodies: AECA (n = 1), anti-AT1R (n = 3), and anti-ETAR (n = 3). The antibody-negative group (n = 13) showed significantly better renal function than the antibody-positive group (non-HLA and/or anti-HLA; n = 22). Biopsy-proven acute rejection had occurred in 2 of 13 (15%) antibody-negative versus 8 of 22 (36%) antibody-positive patients. These preliminary data revealed an high prevalence of autoantibody and alloantibody production among stable patients at 5 years after kidney transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous production of these antibodies and their association with reduced renal function suggests that active humoral immune responses are poorly controlled by immunosuppression.

Allorecognition pathways in transplant rejection and tolerance

With the advent of cellular therapies, it has become clear that the success of future therapies in prolonging allograft survival will require an intimate understanding of the allorecognition pathways and effector mechanisms that are responsible for chronic rejection and late graft loss.Here, we consider current understanding of T-cell allorecognition pathways and discuss the most likely mechanisms by which these pathways collaborate with other effector mechanisms to cause allograft rejection. We also consider how this knowledge may inform development of future strategies to prevent allograft rejection.Although both direct and indirect pathway CD4 T cells appear active immediately after transplantation, it has emerged that indirect pathway CD4 T cells are likely to be the dominant alloreactive T-cell population late after transplantation. Their ability to provide help for generating long-lived alloantibody is likely one of the main mechanisms responsible for the progression of allograft vasculopathy and chronic rejection.Recent work has suggested that regulatory T cells may be an effective cellular therapy in transplantation. Given the above, adoptive therapy with CD4 regulatory T cells with indirect allospecificity is a rational first choice in attempting to attenuate the development and progression of chronic rejection; those with additional properties that enable inhibition of germinal center alloantibody responses hold particular appeal.

Influence of preformed donor-specific antibodies and C4d on early liver allograft function

INTRODUCTION. The impact of preformed donor-specific antibodies (DSA) is incompletely understood in liver transplantation. The incidence and impact of preformed DSA on early post liver transplant were assessed and these were correlated with compliment fragment C4d on allograft biopsy. METHODS. Pretransplant serum from 41 consecutive liver transplant recipients (brain dead donors; DBD = 27 and cardiac death donors; DCD = 14) were tested for class-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and compared against donor HLA types. Liver biopsies were taken during cold storage (t-1) and post-reperfusion (t0) stained with C4d and graded for preservation-reperfusion injury (PRI). RESULTS. Of the 41 recipients, 8 (20%) had anti-HLA class I/II antibodies pretransplant, 3 (7%) were confirmed preformed DSA; classes I and II (n=1) and class I only (n=2). No biopsies showed definite evidence of antibody-mediated rejection. Graft biopsies in overall showed only mild PRI with ischemic hepatocyte C4d pattern similar in both positive and negative DSA patients. One DSA-positive (33%) compared with four DSA-negative patients (10%) had significant early graft dysfunction; severe PRI causing graft loss from primary nonfunction was seen only in DSA-negative group. Allograft biopsy of preformed DSA-positive patient demonstrated only minimal PRI; however, no identifiable cause could be attributed to graft dysfunction other than preformed DSA. CONCLUSION. Preformed DSA are present in 5-10% liver transplant recipients. There is no association between anti-HLA DSA and PRI and C4d, but preformed DSA may cause early morbidity. Larger studies on the impact of DSA with optimization of C4d techniques are required.

B cells display an abnormal distribution and an impaired suppressive function in patients with chronic antibody-mediated rejection

In kidney transplantation, the composition of the B-cell compartment is increasingly identified as an important determinant for graft outcome. Whereas naive and transitional B cells have been associated with long-term allograft survival and operational tolerance, memory B cells have been linked to graft rejection and graft loss. Chronic antibody-mediated rejection now represents a major complication in transplantation and is a challenge in current therapeutics. Here, we show that patients with chronic antibody-mediated rejection display a unique B-cell phenotype with a reduced ratio of activated to memory B cells associated with an impaired immunosuppressive activity. The regulatory functions of the B cells depended on their maturation status. Thus, phenotypic and functional analyses of the B-cell compartment may be indicated for appropriate follow-up after transplantation and drive therapy in the establishment of transplant tolerance processes.

HLA antibody screening in kidney transplantation: current guidelines

BACKGROUND

In organ transplantation, the introduction of the solid phase immunoassay technology radically changed the practice of antibody monitoring against human leukocyte antigens (HLA).

PURPOSE

Precise identification of antibody specificities in complex sera of sensitized patients and monitoring of low levels of donor-specific HLA antibodies in the posttransplant phase became possible. However, at the same time, new technical problems and great variation emerged in the interpretation of test results, indicating a need for standardization.

CONCLUSION

In May 2012, The Transplantation Society (TTS) recruited a panel of laboratory and clinical experts to discuss emerging testing and clinical management issues that are associated with antibody testing in organ transplantation. In this article, we provide a summary of the TTS recommendations formulated in this international effort on the standardization of antibody monitoring in kidney transplantation.

Incidence and clinical significance of de novo donor specific antibodies after kidney transplantation

Kidney transplantation has evolved over more than half a century and remarkable progress has been made in patient and graft outcomes. Despite these advances, chronic allograft dysfunction remains a major problem. Among other reasons, de novo formation of antibodies against donor human leukocyte antigens has been recognized as one of the major risk factors for reduced allograft survival. The type of treatment in the presence of donor specific antibodies (DSA) posttransplantation is largely related to the clinical syndrome the patient presents with at the time of detection. There is no consensus regarding the treatment of stable renal transplant recipients with circulating de novo DSA. On the contrast, in acute or chronic allograft dysfunction transplant centers use various protocols in order to reduce the amount of circulating DSA and achieve long-term graft survival. These protocols include removal of the antibodies by plasmapheresis, intravenous administration of immunoglobulin, or depletion of B cells with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies along with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. This review aims at the comprehension of the clinical correlations of de novo DSA in kidney transplant recipients, assessment of their prognostic value, and providing insights into the management of these patients.

Impact of de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies detected by Luminex solid-phase assay after transplantation in a group of 88 consecutive living-donor renal transplantations

De novo donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) after renal transplantation are known to be correlated with poor graft outcome and the development of acute and chronic rejection. Currently, data for the influence of de novo DSA in patient cohorts including only living-donor renal transplantations (LDRT) are limited. A consecutive cohort of 88 LDRT was tested for the occurrence of de novo DSA by utilizing the highly sensitive Luminex solid-phase assay for antibody detection. Data were analyzed for risk factors for de novo DSA development and correlated with acute rejection (AR) and graft function. Patients with de novo DSA [31 (35%)] showed a trend for inferior graft function [mean creatinine change (mg/dL/year) after the first year: 0.15 DSA (+) vs. 0.02 DSA (-) (P = 0.10)] and a higher rate of AR episodes, especially in case of de novo DSA of both class I and II [6 (55%), (P = 0.05)]. Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) appeared in five patients and was significantly correlated with de novo DSA (P = 0.05). Monitoring for de novo DSA after LDRT may help to identify patients at risk of declining renal function. Especially patients with simultaneous presence of de novo DSA class I and class II are at a high risk to suffer AR episodes.

Effector mechanisms of rejection

Organ transplantation appears today to be the best alternative to replace the loss of vital organs induced by various diseases. Transplants can, however, also be rejected by the recipient. In this review, we provide an overview of the mechanisms and the cells/molecules involved in acute and chronic rejections. T cells and B cells mainly control the antigen-specific rejection and act either as effector, regulatory, or memory cells. On the other hand, nonspecific cells such as endothelial cells, NK cells, macrophages, or polymorphonuclear cells are also crucial actors of transplant rejection. Last, beyond cells, the high contribution of antibodies, chemokines, and complement molecules in graft rejection is discussed in this article. The understanding of the different components involved in graft rejection is essential as some of them are used in the clinic as biomarkers to detect and quantify the level of rejection.

Predictive factors of allosensitization after immunosuppressant withdrawal in recipients of long-term cultured islet cell grafts

BACKGROUND

Islet transplantation has been reported to induce allosensitization in the majority of type 1 diabetic recipients of fresh or shortly incubated islet grafts prepared from one to three donors.

METHODS

We examined the appearance of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies after withdrawal of immunosuppressants in 35 type 1 diabetic recipients of islet cell grafts prepared from a median of 6 donors (range, 2-11), cultured for longer periods, and characterized for their cellular composition. Immunosuppression consisted of antithymocyte globulin induction followed by mycophenolate mofetil plus calcineurin inhibitors (n=28, with 7 also receiving steroids) or sirolimus with (n=3) or without calcineurin inhibitors (n=4). Both the complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) assay (class I) and the solid-phase flow-based Luminex method (class I and II) were used to identify HLA antibodies.

RESULTS

Immunosuppressant withdrawal resulted in CDC positivity for class I antibodies in only 6% of patients. However, the majority became positive for class I antibodies (72%) or class II antibodies (72%) in the Luminex assay; positivity was not correlated to a higher number of donors or HLA mismatches, but with a lower β-cell purity; use of steroids reduced de novo positivity for Luminex class I antibodies.

CONCLUSION

Allosensitization to cultured human islet cell grafts was low when assessed by CDC assay but high in Luminex. No correlation was found with the number of donors but risk was higher for grafts with lower β-cell purity.

Harmful effect of preformed anti-MICA antibodies on renal allograft evolution in early posttransplantation period

BACKGROUND

Pretransplantation anti-major histocompatibility complex class I chain-related molecule A (MICA) sensitization is an uncommon event and its role on kidney graft evolution is not completely defined.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients transplanted between 2005 and 2011 in our center (n=727) was performed. Recipients were classified in four groups, according either to multiplexed flow cytometry-recorded anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and anti-MICA antibodies or to percent panel-reactive antibody (PRA; by complement-dependent cytotoxicity) and anti-MICA antibodies.

RESULTS

In the total cohort, 52 (7.15%) patients had preformed anti-MICA antibodies, and these were not related with anti-HLA, previous transplantations, or recipient female sex (potential pregnancies). Kaplan-Meier curves showed global allograft survival differences (P=0.042) mostly due to pronounced decrease in PRA+MICA+ group early after transplantation. Biopsy-proven allograft rejection rate increased after month 12 in PRA+MICA- group and was higher early after transplantation in PRA+MICA+ group (P=0.033). In paired comparisons, rejection incidence was superior in PRA+MICA- versus PRA-MICA- patients (17% vs. 7%; P=0.007) at 24 months, confirming the widely reported deleterious effect of PRA+ status, but at 3 months rejection was higher in PRA+MICA+ versus PRA-MICA- patients (14% vs. 2%; P=0.009). Among patients categorized according anti-HLA and anti-MICA antibodies, the most striking difference in rejection was observed at 3 months (8% in HLA-MICA+ vs. 2% in HLA-MICA- patients; P=0.032). In the multivariate analysis, HLA-MICA+ status at 3 months independently conferred the highest risk for rejection (odds ratio, 5.07; P=0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

Pretransplantation sensitization against MICA and HLA are independent events. Preformed anti-MICA antibodies independently increase risk for kidney rejection and enhance the deleterious effect of PRA+ status early after transplantation.

Antibody-mediated rejection, T cell-mediated rejection, and the injury-repair response: new insights from the Genome Canada studies of kidney transplant biopsies

Prospective studies of unselected indication biopsies from kidney transplants, combining conventional assessment with molecular analysis, have created a new understanding of transplant disease states and their outcomes. A large-scale Genome Canada grant permitted us to use conventional and molecular phenotypes to create a new disease classification. T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), characterized histologically or molecularly, has little effect on outcomes. Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) manifests as microcirculation lesions and transcript changes reflecting endothelial injury, interferon-γ effects, and natural killer cells. ABMR is frequently C4d negative and has been greatly underestimated by conventional criteria. Indeed, ABMR, triggered in some cases by non-adherence, is the major disease causing failure. Progressive dysfunction is usually attributable to specific diseases, and pure calcineurin inhibitor toxicity rarely explains failure. The importance of ABMR argues against immunosuppressive drug minimization and stands as a barrier to tolerance induction. Microarrays also defined the transcripts induced by acute kidney injury (AKI), which correlate with reduced function, whereas histologic changes of acute tubular injury do not. AKI transcripts are induced in kidneys with late dysfunction, and are better predictors of failure than fibrosis and inflammation. Thus progression reflects ongoing parenchymal injury, usually from identifiable diseases such as ABMR, not destructive fibrosis.

The clinical relevance of pre-formed anti-HLA and anti-MICA antibodies after cord blood transplantation in children

Preformed anti-HLA antibodies (AHA) are known to be associated with delayed engraftment and reduced overall survival after adult hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. However, limited data is available in pediatric patients. In this study, we explored the role of AHA on clinical outcomes in 70 pediatric patients who received a single unit of HLA mismatch cord blood for hematologic malignancies, immunodeficiencies or metabolic diseases. The presence of AHA was detected in 44% (31/70) of the patients. Preformed class I AHA was associated with an increased occurrence of grade 1–4 acute graft-versus host disease (p<0.05). The presence of anti- major-histocompatibility-complex class I–related chain A antigens (MICA) antibodies was significantly associated with a reduced platelet recovery after transplantation (p<0.05). AHA of class II with the strength of antibody titer measured as the mean fluorescence intensity above 2000 was associated with reduced event-free survival (p<0.05). A reduction of high titer of AHA and anti-MICA antibodies might have to be considered before cord blood transplantation in pediatric patients for better outcomes.

ASKP1240, a fully human anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody, prolongs pancreatic islet allograft survival in nonhuman primates

A strategy for inhibiting CD40 has been considered as an alternative approach for immunosuppression because of undesirable effects of anti-CD154 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Previously, we demonstrated that ASKP1240, which is a fully human anti-CD40 mAb, significantly prolonged kidney and liver allograft survival in cynomolgus monkeys without causing thromboembolic complications. Herein, we evaluated the effect of ASKP1240 on pancreatic islet transplantation (PITx) in cynomolgus monkeys. Diabetes was induced by total pancreatectomy, and islet allografts were transplanted into the liver. Following PITx (8201-12 438 IEQ/kg), blood glucose levels normalized promptly in all animals. Control islet allografts were rejected within 9 days (n = 3), whereas ASKP1240 (10 mg/kg) given on postoperative days 0, 4, 7, 11 and 14 (induction treatment, n = 5) significantly prolonged graft survival time (GST) to >15, >23, 210, 250 and >608 days, respectively. When ASKP1240 (5 mg/kg) was administered weekly thereafter up to post-PITx 6 months (maintenance treatment, n = 4), GST was markedly prolonged to >96, >115, 523 and >607 days. During the ASKP1240 treatment period, both anti-donor cellular responses and development of anti-donor antibodies were abolished, and no serious adverse events were noted. ASKP1240 appears to be a promising candidate for immunosuppression in clinical PITx.

Vimentin antibody production in transplant patients and immunomodulatory effects of vimentin in-vitro

We investigated the presence of antibodies to vimentin in 150 patients awaiting transplant, (50 kidney, 50 liver and 50 thoracic) and in 51 previously transplanted kidney patients whose grafts had failed. Patients with primary end stage thoracic or kidney disease did not have increased levels of vimentin antibodies, but those with primary liver failure and those with kidney graft failure did. Those with kidney graft failure were more likely to form vimentin antibodies if the patient was HLA-DQ2 positive (p=<0.001). Further to this, we observed antibody mediated rejection in five HLA-DQ2 positive re-transplant patients where no other antibodies were identified. We investigated the effects of vimentin protein on cytokine production in phytohaemagglutinin stimulated and unstimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells. When exposed to vimentin at low levels there was increased production of IL-10. When cultures were stimulated, there was a decrease in IL-10, IL-2 and IFN-gamma production and a large increase in IL-4 production (p=0.028) compared to the controls. These results suggest that under normal conditions exposure to vimentin can lead to regulation of the immune response. However, if the immune system is active, exposure to vimentin can enhance Th-2 immunity.

Luminex(®) and its applications for solid organ transplantation, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and transfusion

SUMMARY

The detection of antibodies against the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) complex has become indispensable in every clinical practice. The development of solid-phase assays like the Luminex allows the standardized measurement of anti-HLA antibodies (HLAab) with high sensitivity, albeit the relevance for some clinical settings remains a matter of debate. In this review we aim to describe the principle of Luminex-based antibody detection, including two modifications that allow identifying solely complement-activating antibodies. We then describe three applications for Luminex: i) detection of HLAab preceding solid-organ transplantation and monitoring of donor-specific antibodies posttransplant as a risk factor for antibody-mediated rejection; ii) presence of HLAab in recipients as a risk for graft failure in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, especially in haploidentical or mismatched transplantations; iii) role of HLAab in blood transfusion including refractory thrombocytopenia and selection of suitable platelet donors, transfusion-related lung injury after plasma transfusion, and immunization against HLA after red blood cell transfusion despite leukodepletion. Although the Luminex platform constitutes a potent technology for HLA antibody detection, some drawbacks require the well-educated analysis and interpretation of data in critical cases. In addition, Luminex has become an important tool to identify clinically relevant antibodies.

Successful management of factor IX inhibitor-associated nephrotic syndrome in a hemophilia B patient

BACKGROUND

Nephrotic syndrome (NS) is a recognized complication of immune tolerance induction (ITI) therapy, a treatment strategy used to treat inhibitors in patients with hemophilia B receiving factor IX concentrate.

CASE DIAGNOSIS/TREATMENT

We present a 4-year-old boy with hemophilia B and an inhibitor who underwent ITI, and developed NS 19 months into this therapy. A percutaneous renal biopsy was safely performed with factor IX (FIX) concentrate administration both preceding and following the procedure. The patient's inhibitor level had increased to 1.4-1.6 Bethesda Units just prior to the onset of proteinuria. Histology confirmed segmental membranous nephropathy (MGN). The patient was continued on FIX concentrate as ITI and also received 4 weekly doses of rituximab and ongoing immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil. This resulted in the complete resolution of his inhibitor and his NS. He continues with a modified ITI regimen and remains inhibitor-free without proteinuria >12 months post-biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

Hemophilia B patients undergoing ITI should be regularly screened for NS. At first detection of proteinuria, with proper precautions, a percutaneous kidney biopsy can be performed safely in patients with low levels of inhibitor. Our patient had segmental MGN with complete remission of NS.

Antibody-mediated rejection after intestinal transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In spite of impressive improvements in short-term outcomes for intestine transplant recipients, late allograft loss continues to plague the field. Attention has mostly been focused on T-cell-mediated cellular mechanisms of allograft rejection to explain these losses; however, as in other forms of solid-organ transplantation, especially kidney and heart, antibody-mediated mechanisms of acute and chronic allograft injury are increasingly being implicated. In this review, the mechanisms of B-cell- and humoral-mediated allograft injury will be briefly discussed along with the limited evidence that exist for invoking antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) as important in intestine transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The presence of donor-specific antibody has been reported to increase the incidence and severity of intestine allograft rejection and to worsen the overall prognosis for graft and patient. C4d staining in intestine biopsies is unreliable, and currently it is not possible to diagnose AMR with certainty in intestine transplantation. Treatment of presumed AMR in intestine recipients is purely anecdotal at this time.

SUMMARY

Further basic and clinical research needs to be conducted to more confidently diagnose and treat AMR in intestinal transplantation.

Molecular diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection in human kidney transplants

Antibody-mediated rejection is the major cause of kidney transplant failure, but the histology-based diagnostic system misses most cases due to its requirement for C4d positivity. We hypothesized that gene expression data could be used to test biopsies for the presence of antibody-mediated rejection. To develop a molecular test, we prospectively assigned diagnoses, including C4d-negative antibody-mediated rejection, to 403 indication biopsies from 315 patients, based on histology (microcirculation lesions) and donor-specific HLA antibody. We then used microarray data to develop classifiers that assigned antibody-mediated rejection scores to each biopsy. The transcripts distinguishing antibody-mediated rejection from other conditions were mostly expressed in endothelial cells or NK cells, or were IFNG-inducible. The scores correlated with the presence of microcirculation lesions and donor-specific antibody. Of 45 biopsies with scores>0.5, 39 had been diagnosed as antibody-mediated rejection on the basis of histology and donor-specific antibody. High scores were also associated with unanimity among pathologists that antibody-mediated rejection was present. The molecular score also strongly predicted future graft loss in Cox regression analysis. We conclude that microarray assessment of gene expression can assign a probability of ABMR to transplant biopsies without knowledge of HLA antibody status, histology, or C4d staining, and predicts future failure.

The clinical impact of humoral immunity in pediatric renal transplantation

The development of anti-donor humoral responses after transplantation associates with higher risks for acute rejection and 1-year graft survival in adults, but the influence of humoral immunity on transplant outcomes in children is not well understood. Here, we studied the evolution of humoral immunity in low-risk pediatric patients during the first 2 years after renal transplantation. Using data from 130 pediatric renal transplant patients randomized to steroid-free (SF) or steroid-based (SB) immunosuppression in the NIH-SNSO1 trial, we correlated the presence of serum anti-HLA antibodies to donor HLA antigens (donor-specific antibodies) and serum MHC class 1-related chain A (MICA) antibody with both clinical outcomes and histology identified on protocol biopsies at 0, 6, 12, and 24 months. We detected de novo antibodies after transplant in 24% (23% of SF group and 25% of SB group), most often after the first year. Overall, 22% developed anti-HLA antibodies, of which 6% were donor-specific antibodies, and 6% developed anti-MICA antibody. Presence of these antibodies de novo associated with significantly higher risks for acute rejection (P=0.02), chronic graft injury (P=0.02), and decline in graft function (P=0.02). In summary, antibodies to HLA and MICA antigens appear in approximately 25% of unsensitized pediatric patients, placing them at greater risk for acute and chronic rejection with accelerated loss of graft function. Avoiding steroids does not seem to modify this incidence. Whether serial assessments of these antibodies after transplant could guide individual tailoring of immunosuppression requires additional study.

Clinical relevance of antibody development in renal transplantation

The detection and characterization of anti-HLA antibodies and the clinical impact of their appearance following renal transplantation are areas of immense interest. In particular, de novo development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) has been associated with acute and chronic antibody-mediated graft rejection (AMR). Recently, methods for antibody detection have evolved remarkably from conventional cell-based assays to advanced solid phase systems. These systems have revolutionized the art of defining clinically relevant antibodies that are directed toward a renal graft. While anti-HLA DSAs have been widely associated with poor graft survival, the role of non-HLA antibodies, particularly those directed against endothelial cells, is beginning to be realized. Appreciation of the mechanisms underlying T cell recognition of alloantigens has generated great interest in the use of synthetic peptides to prevent graft rejection. Hopefully, continued progress in unraveling the molecular mechanisms of graft rejection and posttransplant monitoring of antibodies using highly sensitive testing systems will prove beneficial to immunological risk assessment and early prediction of renal allograft failure.

Microcirculation inflammation associates with outcome in renal transplant patients with de novo donor-specific antibodies

In renal transplant patients with de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) we studied the value of microcirculation inflammation (MI; defined by the addition of glomerulitis (g) and peritubular capillaritis (ptc) scores) to assess long-term graft survival in a retrospective cohort study. Out of all transplant patients with standard immunological risk (n = 638), 79 (12.4%) developed dnDSA and 58/79 (73%) had an indication biopsy at or after dnDSA development. Based on the MI score on that indication biopsy patients were categorized, MI0 (n = 26), MI1 + 2 (n = 21) and MI ≥ 3 (n = 11). The MI groups did not differ significantly pretransplantation, whereas posttransplantation higher MI scores developed more anti-HLA class I + II DSA (p = 0.011), showed more TCMR (p < 0.001) and showed a trend to C4d-positive staining (p = 0.059). Four-year graft survival estimates from time of indication biopsy were MI0 96.1%, MI1 + 2 76.1% and MI ≥ 3 17.1%; resulting in a 24-fold increased risk of graft failure in the MI ≥ 3 compared to the MI0 group (p = 0.003; 95% CI [3.0-196.0]). When adjusted for C4d, MI ≥ 3 still had a 21-fold increased risk of graft failure (p = 0.005; 95% CI [2.5-180.0]), while C4d positivity on indication biopsy lost significance. In renal transplant patients with de novo DSA, microcirculation inflammation, defined by g + ptc, associates with graft survival.

Identification and characterization of kidney transplants with good glomerular filtration rate at 1 year but subsequent progressive loss of renal function

BACKGROUND

After the first year after kidney transplantation, 3% to 5% of grafts fail each year but detailed studies of how grafts progress to failure are lacking. This study aimed to analyze the functional stability of kidney transplants between 1 and 5 years after transplantation and to identify initially well-functioning grafts with progressive decline in allograft function.

METHODS

The study included 788 adult conventional kidney transplants performed at the Mayo Clinic Rochester between January 2000 and December 2005 with a minimum graft survival and follow-up of 2.6 years. The modification of diet in renal disease equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR(MDRD)) was used to calculate the slope of renal function over time using all available serum creatinine values between 1 and 5 years after transplantation.

RESULTS

Most transplants demonstrated good function (eGFR(MDRD) ≥40 mL/min) at 1 year with positive eGFR(MDRD) slope between 1 and 5 years after transplantation. However, a subset of grafts with 1-year eGFR(MDRD) ≥40 mL/min exhibited strongly negative eGFR(MDRD) slope between 1 and 5 years suggestive of progressive loss of graft function. Forty-one percent of this subset reached graft failure during follow-up, accounting for 69% of allograft failures occurring after 2.5 years after transplantation. This pattern of progressive decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate despite good early function was associated with but not fully attributable to factors suggestive of enhanced antidonor immunity.

CONCLUSIONS

Longitudinal analysis of serial estimated glomerular filtration ratemeasurements identifies initially well-functioning kidney transplants at high risk for subsequent graft loss. For this subset, further studies are needed to identify modifiable causes of functional decline.

Humoral theory of transplantation: some hot topics

INTRODUCTION

Antibody is a major cause of allograft injury. However, it has not been routinely tested post-transplant.

SOURCES OF DATA

A literature search was performed using PubMed on the topics of 'antibody monitoring', 'autoantibody and allograft dysfunction' and 'prevention and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR)'.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

Donor-specific antibody (DSA) monitoring not only helps to identify patients at risk of AMR, but also serves as a biomarker to personalize patient's maintenance immunosuppression. Development of autoantibody is a secondary response following primary tissue injury. Some autoantibodies are directly involved in allograft injury, while others only serve as biomarkers of tissue injury.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

It remains controversial whether DSA-positive patients without symptoms need to be treated. In addition, given the variation in study designs and patient's characteristics, there is discrepancy regarding which treatment regimens provide optimal clinical outcome in preventing/treating AMR.

GROWING POINTS

Efficacy of B-cell and/or antibody-targeted therapies in treating or preventing AMR would be better measured by the incorporation of antibody monitoring into current functional and pathological assays.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

Research in B-cell targeted therapies to prevent and treat AMR is rapidly growing, which includes monoclonal antibodies against B-cell markers CD20, CD40, CD19, BlyS, etc. It requires extensive clinical research to determine the best approach to inhibit or delete antibody and how to balance the drug efficacy with safety.

The treatment of acute antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients-a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a recognized cause of allograft loss in kidney transplant recipients. A range of therapies targeting removal of circulating donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), blocking their effect or reducing production have been reported.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review to determine the efficacy of treatments for acute AMR in renal allografts. Electronic databases, reference lists, and conference proceedings were searched for controlled trials. Nonrandomized publications were reviewed for the purpose of discussion.

RESULTS

We identified 10,388 citations, including five randomized and seven nonrandomized controlled trials. The randomized studies were small (median, 13 patients/arm; range, 5-23), of which, four examined plasmapheresis (one suggested benefit) and one for immunoadsorption (also suggesting benefit). Marked heterogeneity was evident, including the definition and severity of AMR and the treatment regimen. The end point of graft survival was common to all studies. Small, nonrandomized controlled studies suggested benefit from rituximab or bortezomib. The effects of dose and regimen on the clinical response to any of the current treatments were not apparent from the available data.

CONCLUSIONS

Data describing the efficacy of treatments for AMR in renal allografts are of low or very low quality. Larger randomized controlled trials and dose-response studies are required.

Posttransplant de novo donor-specific hla antibodies identify pediatric kidney recipients at risk for late antibody-mediated rejection

The emerging role of humoral immunity in the pathogenesis of chronic allograft damage has prompted research aimed at assessing the role of anti-HLA antibody (Ab) monitoring as a tool to predict allograft outcome. Data on the natural history of allografts in children developing de novo Ab after transplantation are limited. Utilizing sera collected pretransplant, and serially posttransplant, we retrospectively evaluated 82 consecutive primary pediatric kidney recipients, without pretransplant donor-specific antibodies (DSA), for de novo Ab occurrence, and compared results with clinical-pathologic data. At 4.3-year follow up, 19 patients (23%) developed de novo DSA whereas 24 had de novo non-DSA (NDSA, 29%). DSA appeared at a median time of 24 months after transplantation and were mostly directed to HLA-DQ antigens. Among the 82 patients, eight developed late/chronic active C4d+ antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), and four C4d-negative AMR. Late AMR correlated with DSA (p < 0.01), whose development preceded AMR by 1-year median time. Patients with DSA had a median serum creatinine of 1.44 mg/dL at follow up, significantly higher than NDSA and Ab-negative patients (p < 0.005). In our pediatric cohort, DSA identify patients at risk of renal dysfunction, AMR and graft loss; treatment started at Ab emergence might prevent AMR occurrence and/or progression to graft failure.

Solid phase detection of C4d-fixing HLA antibodies to predict rejection in high immunological risk kidney transplant recipients

Protocols for recipient desensitization may allow for successful kidney transplantation across major immunological barriers. Desensitized recipients, however, still face a considerable risk of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), which underscores the need for risk stratification tools to individually tailor treatment. Here, we investigated whether solid phase detection of complement-fixing donor-specific antibodies (DSA) has the potential to improve AMR prediction in high-risk transplants. The study included 68 sensitized recipients of deceased donor kidney allografts who underwent peritransplant immunoadsorption for alloantibody depletion (median cytotoxic panel reactivity: 73%; crossmatch conversion: n = 21). Pre and post-transplant sera were subjected to detection of DSA-triggered C4d deposition ([C4d]DSA) applying single-antigen bead (SAB) technology. While standard crossmatch and [IgG]SAB testing failed to predict outcomes in our desensitized patients, detection of preformed [C4d]DSA (n = 44) was tightly associated with C4d-positive AMR [36% vs. 8%, P = 0.01; binary logistic regression: odds ratio: 10.1 (95% confidence interval: 1.6-64.2), P = 0.01]. Moreover, long-term death-censored graft survival tended to be worse among [C4d]DSA-positive recipients (P = 0.07). There were no associations with C4d-negative AMR or cellular rejection. [C4d]DSA detected 6 months post-transplantation were not related to clinical outcomes. Our data suggest that pretransplant SAB-based detection of complement-fixing DSA may be a valuable tool for risk stratification.

Clinical relevance of anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies detected by Luminex assay in the development of rejection after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

The role of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) donor-specific antibodies (DSA) detected by Luminex in the development of rejection is not fully understood.

METHODS

A study including 369 patients who received transplants from deceased donors with a negative complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (XM) was performed. From the total of patients, 151 underwent a renal biopsy because of renal dysfunction, whereas the 218 remaining showed a stable renal function, and no rejection was assumed. Diagnosis and type of rejection was based in biopsy data.

RESULTS

Patients with a positive virtual XMs showed more rejection episodes of any types when comparing with patients with negative virtual XMs (P<0.0001). Nevertheless, there were no significant differences between patients without anti-HLA antibodies and patients with anti-HLA no DSA. Allograft impairment was caused by a rejection episode in 84% (32/38) of patients with anti-HLA-DSA but only in 30% (34/113) of patients without anti-HLA-DSA. Regarding the type of rejection detected in the biopsy, all the patients with de novo (after transplantation) anti-HLA-DSA were diagnosed as antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) or AMR+T-cell-mediated rejection, whereas most of the patients without anti-HLA-DSA (68%) were diagnosed with T-cell-mediated rejection, and patients with preexistent anti-HLA-DSA showed a more homogeneous distribution of the different types of rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our results, patients with preformed or de novo anti-HLA-DSA showed the highest likelihood to suffer rejection episodes. Transplantation with preformed anti-HLA-DSA should be avoided, and an early detection of de novo HLA antibodies is important to treat patients before damage occurs in the graft.

Prevention of antibody-mediated kidney transplant rejection

There is increasing evidence that antibody-mediated rejection is the major cause of late kidney graft failure. Prevention of antibody-mediated allograft damage has therefore become an important issue in kidney transplantation. Such prevention starts already before transplantation with the avoidance of sensitizing events. When a patient is already sensitized, precise characterization of alloantibodies and exact HLA typing of the donor at the time of transplantation are mandatory. To ensure timely and successful transplantation of highly sensitized patients, desensitization, and inclusion in special programs such as the Eurotransplant Acceptable Mismatch Program should be considered. After transplantation, close monitoring of kidney function, testing for the de novo development or changing characteristics of alloantibodies, and attention to non-adherence to immunosuppression is obligatory. In the current overview, we discuss the currently available measures for the prevention of antibody-mediated kidney graft rejection.

Detection of complement-fixing and non-fixing antibodies specific for endothelial precursor cells and lymphocytes using flow cytometry

Donor human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-specific antibodies (Abs) with the ability to activate complement are associated with an increased risk of early Ab-mediated rejection (AMR) of kidney allografts. In recent years, also non-HLA Abs-binding endothelial cells have been shown to elicit early AMR. Donor-specific anti-endothelial cell Abs escape detection in the pre-transplant evaluation if only lymphocytes are used as target cells in crossmatch tests. We addressed whether endothelial precursor cells (EPCs) could be used for detection of complement-fixing as well as non-fixing Abs and if complement factor and immunoglobulin G (IgG) deposition on co-purified T and B cells correlated to the outcome of the T- and B-cell complement-dependent cytotoxicity assay. Deposition of complement factors C3c and C3d, but not C1q nor C4d, were detected on EPCs and lymphocytes upon incubation with HLA Ab-positive sera. There was a correlation between the amount of C3c deposition and IgG binding on EPCs (R(2) = 0.71, P = 0.0012) and T cells (R(2) = 0.74, P = 0.0006) but not for B cells (R(2) = 0.34, P = 0.059). The specificity and sensitivity for C3d deposition on endothelial precursor cell crossmatch (EPCXM) T cells vs the T complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) assay were 69% and 72%, respectively. The EPCXM B-cell C3d assay had considerably lower sensitivity (39%) than the B CDC assay. Altogether, this novel assay based on the detection of complements factors on EPCs and lymphocytes by flow cytometry may widen the diagnostic repertoire and thereby improve the clinical management of patients undergoing kidney transplantation.

Partial therapeutic response to Rituximab for the treatment of chronic alloantibody mediated rejection of kidney allografts

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Chronic rejection leads to kidney allograft failure and develops in many kidney transplant recipients. One cause of chronic rejection, chronic antibody mediated rejection (CAMR), is attributed to alloantibodies. Maintenance immunosuppression including prednisone, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and calcineurin inhibitors may limit alloantibody production in some patients, but many maintain or develop alloantibody production, leading to CAMR. Therefore, no efficacious therapy to treat CAMR is presently available to prevent the progression of CAMR to kidney allograft failure.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS

We performed a retrospective review of 31 subjects with CAMR, of which 14 received Rituximab and 17 subjects did not. Response to Rituximab was defined as decline or stabilization of serum creatinine for at least one year. Data reviewed included demographic, clinical, allograft, post-transplant, and pathological variables. Pathological variables in the diagnostic allograft biopsy were scored according to Banff criteria.

RESULTS

The median survival time (MST) for allografts in the control group was 439 days, and for the Rituximab treated group was 685 days. The Rituximab group was dichotomous with 8 subjects showing a medial survival time of 1180 days, and 6 subjects having a median survival time of 431 days. The MST for the responders was statistically significant from the non-responders and controls. No pathological parameter distinguished any subset of subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that Rituximab followed by standard maintenance immunosuppression shows a therapeutic effect in the treatment of CAMR, which is confined to a subset of treated subjects, not identifiable a priori.

Donor-recipient sex mismatch in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

The lack of reliable human proxies for minor (ie, non-HLA) histocompatibility loci hampers the ability to leverage these factors toward improving transplant outcomes. Despite conflicting reports of the effect of donor-recipient sex mismatch on renal allografts, the association between acute rejection of renal allografts and the development of human alloantibodies to the male H-Y antigen suggested to us that donor-recipient sex mismatch deserved re-evaluation.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the relationships between donor sex and allograft failure differed by recipient sex.

METHODS

We studied recipients of deceased-donor (n = 125,369) and living-donor (n = 63,139) transplants in the United States Renal Data System. Using Cox proportional hazards models stratified by donor type, we estimated the association between donor-recipient sex mismatch and death-censored allograft failure with adjustment for known risk factors, with and without the use of multiple imputation methods to account for potential bias and/or loss of efficiency due to missing data.

RESULTS

The advantage afforded by male donor kidneys was more pronounced among male than among female recipients (8% vs 2% relative risk reduction; interaction P < 0.01). This difference is of the order of magnitude of several other risk factors affecting donor selection decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor-recipient sex mismatch affects renal allograft survival in a direction consistent with immune responses to sexually determined minor histocompatibility antigens. Our study provides a paradigm for clinical detection of markers for minor histocompatibility loci.

Expansion of polyreactive B cells cross-reactive to HLA and self in the blood of a patient with kidney graft rejection

Antibody rejection is often accompanied by nondonor HLA specific antibodies (NDSA) and self-reactive antibodies that develop alongside donor-specific antibodies (DSA). To determine the source of these antibodies, we immortalized 107 B-cell clones from a kidney transplant recipient with humoral rejection. Two of these clones reacted to HLA class I or MICA. Both clones were also reactive to self-antigens and a lysate of a kidney cell line, hence revealing a pattern of polyreactivity. Monoclonality was verified by the identification of a single rearranged immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (VH) sequence for each clone. By tracking their unique CDR3 sequence, we found that one such polyreactive clone was highly expanded in the patient blood, representing ~0.2% of circulating B cells. The VH sequence of this clone showed evidence of somatic mutations that were consistent with its memory phenotype and its expansion. Lastly, the reactivity of the expanded polyreactive B-cell clone was found in the patient serum at time of rejection. In conclusion, we provide here proof of principle at the clonal level that human antibodies can cross-react to HLA and self. Our findings strongly suggest that polyreactive antibodies contribute to DSA, NDSA as well as autoantibodies, in transplant recipients.

Antibody-mediated rejection of single class I MHC-disparate cardiac allografts

Murine CCR5(-/-) recipients produce high titers of antibody to complete MHC-mismatched heart and renal allografts. To study mechanisms of class I MHC antibody-mediated allograft injury, we tested the rejection of heart allografts transgenically expressing a single class I MHC disparity in wild-type C57BL/6 (H-2(b)) and B6.CCR5(-/-) recipients. Donor-specific antibody titers in CCR5(-/-) recipients were 30-fold higher than in wild-type recipients. B6.K(d) allografts survived longer than 60 days in wild-type recipients whereas CCR5(-/-) recipients rejected all allografts within 14 days. Rejection was accompanied by infiltration of CD8 T cells, neutrophils and macrophages, and C4d deposition in the graft capillaries. B6.K(d) allografts were rejected by CD8(-/-)/CCR5(-/-), but not μMT(-/-)/CCR5(-/-), recipients indicating the need for antibody but not CD8 T cells. Grafts recovered at day 10 from CCR5(-/-) and CD8(-/-)/CCR5(-/-) recipients and from RAG-1(-/-) allograft recipients injected with anti-K(d) antibodies expressed high levels of perforin, myeloperoxidase and CCL5 mRNA. These studies indicate that the continual production of antidonor class I MHC antibody can mediate allograft rejection, that donor-reactive CD8 T cells synergize with the antibody to contribute to rejection, and that expression of three biomarkers during rejection can occur in the absence of this CD8 T cell activity.

Long-term hepatic allograft acceptance based on CD40 blockade by ASKP1240 in nonhuman primates

Blockade of the CD40-CD154 costimulatory signal is an attractive strategy for immunosuppression and tolerance induction in organ transplantation. Treatment with anti-CD154 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) results in potent immunosuppression in nonhuman primates (NHPs). Despite plans for future clinical use, further development of these treatments was halted by complications. As an alternative approach, we have been focusing on the inhibition of the counter receptor, CD40 and have shown that a novel human anti-CD40 mAb, ASKP1240, markedly prolongs renal allograft survival in NHPs, although allografts eventually underwent chronic allograft nephropathy. On the basis of our previous findings that a CD40-CD154 costimulation blockade induces tolerance to hepatic, but not cardiac, allografts in rodents, we tested here our hypothesis that a blockade of CD40 by ASKP1240 allows acceptance of hepatic allografts in NHPs. A 2-week ASKP1240 induction treatment prolonged liver allograft survival in NHPs; however, the graft function deteriorated due to chronic rejection. In contrast, a 6-month ASKP1240 maintenance monotherapy efficiently suppressed both cellular and humoral alloimmune responses and prevented rejection on the hepatic allograft. No serious side effects, including thromboembolic complications, were noted in the ASKP1240-treated monkeys. We conclude that CD40 blockade by ASKP1240 would be a desirable immunosuppressant for clinical liver transplantation.

Generation of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies after the transplantation of a fully matched kidney allograft and its impact on the selection of a subsequent renal regraft: a case report

Detection of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies and identification of their specificities represent important tasks for patients awaiting kidney allografts. Regarding patients immunized by pregnancies, transfusions, or previous transplantations of solid organs, the immunization status must be observed carefully because grafting them with HLA phenotypes recognized by their antibodies represents the main cause for hyper-acute or acute rejection episodes, often leading to transplant loss. A 10-year-old patient with end-stage renal insufficiency of HLA type A3, 25; B8, 18, (Bw6); Cw7,12; DR15,17; DR51,52; DQ2,6 received a deceased donor graft showing no HLA mismatch in 1998. It lost function after 8 years, resulting in the patient's re-entry onto the waiting list for kidney transplantation in 2006. Antibody screening detected anti-HLA-A25, A26, A34, and A66 (broad A10) antibodies using various techniques (DynaChip, Single Antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]). Additionally, a kidney offer expressing the HLA-A25 phenotype was not acceptable for the patient due to a positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity assay (CDC)-based cross-match. The question arose whether this reactivity might be due to auto-reactive antibodies directed against the HLA-A25 phenotype. However, no auto-reactive antibodies were detectable using either the CDC-based or the antibody monitoring system-ELISA-based cross-match assays. Consequently the patient was re-examined at high resolution showing the rare HLA-A*25:14 genotype. This case showed that rare alleles may result in allele-specific antibodies directed against the common variants, thus leading to unexpected positive cross-match results against apparently matched allografts.

A personal perspective: 100-year history of the humoral theory of transplantation

The humoral theory states that antibodies cause the rejection of allografts. From 1917 to 1929, extensive efforts were made to produce antibodies against tumors. It was finally realized that the antibodies were produced against the transplant antigens present on transplantable tumors, not against the tumor-specific antigens. To get around this problem, inbred mouse strains were developed, leading to identification of the transplant antigens determined by the H-2 locus of mice. The antibodies were hemagglutinating and cytotoxic antibodies. The analogous human leukocyte antigen system was established by analysis of lymphocytotoxic alloantibodies that were made by pregnant women, directed against mismatched antigens of the fetus. The human leukocyte antigen antibodies were then found to cause hyperacute rejection, acute rejection, and chronic rejection of kidneys. Antibodies appeared in almost all patients after rejection of kidneys. With Luminex single antigen bead technology, donor-specific antibodies could be identified before rise in serum creatinine and graft failure. Antibodies were shown to be predictive of subsequent graft failure in kidney, heart, and lung transplants: patients without antibodies had superior 4-year graft survival compared with those who did have antibodies. New evidence that antibodies are also associated with chronic failure has appeared for liver and islet transplants. Four studies have now shown that removal or reduction of antibodies result in higher graft survival. If removal of antibodies prevents chronic graft failure, final validation of the humoral theory can be achieved.