Long-term safety and efficacy of tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in children

Topical tacrolimus 0.1% ointment for refractory skin disease in dermatomyositis: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Dermatomyositis is an inflammatory disease primarily involving the striated muscles and skin. Muscle disease usually responds to aggressive therapy with systemic corticosteroids. However, cutaneous lesions can be very resistant to systemic and topical therapies, even in combination. More treatment options are needed. Tacrolimus is an immunomodulator now available in a topical ointment.

OBJECTIVE

To study the treatment of patients with refractory cutaneous lesions of dermatomyositis using topical tacrolimus 0.1% ointment.

METHODS

Six patients with recalcitrant cutaneous lesions of dermatomyositis were included in this brief observational study: five adults and one pediatric patient. Five patients had classic dermatomyositis and one had dermatomyositis sine myositis.

RESULTS

All had some degree of improvement of their dermatologic disease following 6-8 weeks of treatment with topical tacrolimus 0.1% ointment. Two had dramatic responses (>90% improvement), one had moderate (40-90%) improvement and three had minimal (20-40%) improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

The dermatologic manifestations of dermatomyositis can be very difficult to treat. Multiple systemic and topical therapies have been studied. Combinations of treatments are often used, sometimes still not successfully. The results of this brief observational study using topical tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of refractory cutaneous lesions of dermatomyositis are encouraging. Topical tacrolimus was a useful adjunct in the treatment of the dermatologic component of dermatomyositis in adults and children in this pilot study.

Complementary therapy for atopic eczema and other allergic skin diseases

Atopic eczema is one of the most common chronic inflammatory skin diseases, with a prevalence of at least 10% in children and 0.5-1% in adults. The disease shows a drastically increasing tendency. This article provides an overview of the pathophysiology, pathomechanisms, prevention, and treatment of atopic eczema. We present a therapeutic concept that integrates all aspects of the complex pathophysiology that is a prerequisite for individualized and successful treatment. This is based on intervention in the pathophysiology of atopic eczema and elimination of exogenous provocation factors. Particular attention is given to unconventional therapy options such as phytotherapy, which are attracting patients in many countries, and possible effects, side effects, and interactions with other drugs are discussed.

Recent Advances in Treatment Strategies for Atopic Dermatitis

A wide range of different therapeutic regimens are used for atopic dermatitis. Although many treatment modalities are well established worldwide among clinicians, only the minority of these therapy recommendations are based on results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). To close the gap between such 'generally' recommended therapies and therapies that are based on data from controlled trials, this review focuses not only on the pharmacological and clinical aspects of the currently proven agents, but also on the advantages and disadvantages of therapies that have not yet been completely tested.A review of the available literature concerning the pharmacological profile and also the level of evidence of therapeutic efficacy of all currently known topical and systemic agents for the treatment of atopic dermatitis reveals a large gap between the knowledge concerning the pharmacological action in vitro and the evidence of clinical efficacy in many cases. We agree with the conclusion of previous reviews that numerous therapies for atopic dermatitis urgently require more independent RCTs and especially comparative trials (e.g. corticosteroids vs calcineurin inhibitors). These are required in order to facilitate the choice of therapeutic strategy for the individual treatment of atopic dermatitis, with its broad spectrum of clinical manifestations and potential complications in adult patients and, particularly, in children.Finally, we also review preclinical trials with several new drugs. Immunomodulators appear to promise a new dimension for the future of therapy for atopic dermatitis, especially for severe and otherwise refractory forms or as alternatives to corticosteroids, that is, to treat facial atopic eczema without the risk of adverse effects.

Tacrolimus ointment 0.1% in the treatment of nickel-induced allergic contact dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus is a macrolactam that prevents the transcription of messenger RNA for various inflammatory cytokines in both helper T cells (types 1 and 2) (T(H)1 and T(H)2). It is currently approved for the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis, a Th2-mediated disease, in children and adults.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tacrolimus ointment 0.1% in the treatment of nickel-induced allergic contact dermatitis, a T(H)1-mediated disease.

METHODS

This was a double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled, bilateral paired comparison study to assess the safety and efficacy of topical tacrolimus (Protopic, Fujisawa Healthcare Inc, Deerfield, Ill) ointment 0.1% in the treatment of allergic contact dermatitis induced by nickel sulfate. Volunteers were individuals with known hypersensitivity to nickel. Reactivity to nickel was graded both as the investigator's global assessment and total signs and symptoms, which consisted of the cumulative grade from 0 to 4 for each of the following parameters: erythema, induration, vesiculation, and pruritus (range of scores: 0-16). Reactivity was assessed in the per-protocol group at 1 and 2 weeks after beginning treatment with study drug and control. Adverse events were assessed in the intent-to-treat population.

RESULTS

Of the 19 volunteers who completed the study (per protocol), 18 had an improvement in total signs and symptoms with tacrolimus versus 10 patients with the vehicle. Of patients, 80% had an improvement in the investigator's global assessment score on the tacrolimus-treated site versus 30% of patients on the placebo-treated site. Overall, tacrolimus was more effective than placebo in ameliorating the nickel reaction. Although the tacrolimus treated site was clear or almost clear in a greater number of individuals at week 1, this difference did not become significant until the second week of the study. Other than application site burning in 25% of volunteers, no significant adverse events were noted in the intent-to-treat population.

CONCLUSION

Topical tacrolimus (Protopic, Fujisawa Healthcare Inc) ointment 0.1% may be an option for the treatment of allergic contact dermatitis induced by nickel.

Safe treatment of head/neck AD with tacrolimus ointment

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis(AD) with head and neck involvement is common and therapeutically challenging.

METHODS

Efficacy and safety data specific to treatment of head/neck regions with tacrolimus ointment (Protopic) from three double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled studies are reported. A total of 631 adult and 352 pediatric patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis applied the vehicle, 0.03% or 0.1% tacrolimus ointment twice daily to affected areas for up to 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Significant improvements from baseline to end of treatment for signs of atopic dermatitis (erythema, edema, excoriation, oozing, scaling, and lichenification) were noted for head/neck and non-head/neck areas treated with either 0.03% or 0.1% tacrolimus ointment (p<0.001). Within each treatment group, the overall 12-week adjusted incidence rate of application site adverse events was similar for both head/neck and non-head/neck areas. The incidence of common adverse events such as pruritus, "skin burning", erythema, infection, and skin tingling in head/neck areas was comparable to that observed in non-head/neck areas within each treatment group. The overall prevalence of application site adverse events decreased rapidly during the first few days of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus ointment is a safe and effective treatment for atopic dermatitis on the head and neck.

Tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of vulvar lichen sclerosus

The treatment of vulvar lichen sclerosus is generally considered difficult. Ultrapotent corticosteroids represent the most effective topical treatment, but carry the risk of side effects such as skin atrophy. We describe a 71-year-old woman with long-standing vulvar lichen sclerosus refractory to conventional treatment. After 6 consecutive weeks of treatment with tacrolimus ointment 0.1% (Protopic) twice daily, signs and symptoms of lichen sclerosus resolved. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the use of topical tacrolimus, which does not induce skin atrophy, in the treatment of vulvar lichen sclerosus.

[Practice experience with topical calcineurin inhibitors]

The clinical experience with topical calcineurin inhibitors in the field is still rudimentary, if compared to our knowledge of topical corticosteroids. This is especially true for the long-term effects. The systemic transcutaneous absorption that occurs during the therapy of atopic dermatitis is quantitatively irrelevant. However, in the setting of permanent disruption of the skin barrier, as may be encountered in rare Genodermatoses, but as well in cases that do not respond to therapy, continued treatment my result in clinically relevant blood levels. Side effects of topical calcineurin inhibitors may be separated into two groups, i.e. local intolerance reactions, and skin infections. While the typical burning sensation of the newly treated skin is ephemeral, local alcohol intolerance, albeit less frequent, will persist throughout the treatment period. Regarding skin infections, Eczema herpeticatum seems to be the only serious complication; adequate preventive will further reduce the risk of this rare complication.

Managing childhood atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis, a chronic inflammatory skin disorder that affects up to 20% of school-aged children, can profoundly influence quality of life. Basic therapy consists of avoidance of triggering factors and optimal skin care. Until now, corticosteroids have been the usual treatment for acute flares. Short-term safety profiles are reasonable, but long-term use of corticosteroids may involve significant adverse effects. Topical immunomodulators (tacrolimus and pimecrolimus) are beneficial and safe for adults and children and represent a major new alternative to chronic corticosteroid use, especially in children.

[Antipruritic effects of pimecrolimus and tacrolimus]

The development of topical calcineurin inhibitors resulted in a significant improvement in the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases such as atopic dermatitis. In addition, an excellent amelioration of pruritus could be observed. Other itchy dermatoses such as chronic irritative hand dermatitis, rosacea, graft-versus-host-disease, renal pruritus, lichen sclerosus, prurigo simplex, prurigo nodularis, scrotal eczema, and inverse psoriasis also have been treated successfully with pimecrolimus and tacrolimus. The antipruritic effect currently is believed to be related to the inhibition of inflammatory cytokines. Furthermore, recent investigations indicate a release of neuropeptides from sensory nerve fibers and degranulation of mast cells mediated by pimecrolimus and tacrolimus. Similar effects have been observed during capsaicin treatment. These findings may provide a possible explanation for initially observed calcineurin inhibitors related side-effects such as burning and pruritus. Moreover, the antipruritic potency may be related to a direct effect on nerve fibers leading to suppression of itch mediated by unknown mechanisms.

[Long term management of childhood atopic dermatitis with calcineurin inhibitors]

The calcineurin inhibitors pimecrolimus and tacrolimus are important tools for long-term management of atopic dermatitis in childhood. These drugs are approved in Germany for the intermittent long-term treatment of moderate to severe (tacrolimus ointment) or mild to moderate (pimecrolimus cream) atopic dermatitis in children older than 2 years. Recent study results show that these agents are also effective in infants (aged 3-23 months) with atopic dermatitis. During the long-term treatment of children and infants with calcineurin inhibitors, the therapeutic success can be maintained and there is a continuous increase in the response rate. Long-term use of calcineurin inhibitors in atopic dermatitis is well tolerated locally and systemically, leads to reduction of disease flares and has a corticosteroid sparing effect.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of tacrolimus ointment versus high-potency topical corticosteroids in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Few cost-effectiveness analyses have been conducted on topical therapies for atopic dermatitis.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare cost-effectiveness of high-potency topical corticosteroids (HPTCs) and tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis for patients who are not responsive to or not well controlled with mid-potency topical corticosteroids.

METHODS

A Markov model represented the cyclic nature of atopic dermatitis. Clinical outcomes were derived from published literature. "Efficacy" was defined as disease-controlled days on which patients experienced a greater than 75% improvement in their disease. Resource use and changes in management were on the basis of opinions of a physician panel; secondary treatment was an oral antibiotic with topical corticosteroids. Sensitivity analyses were conducted for all variables.

RESULTS

The model was sensitive to duration of continuous treatment with HPTCs. HPTCs, when limited to 2-week treatment cycles, were associated with the highest total costs ($1682 per year) and the least efficacy (185 disease-controlled days). HPTCs in 4-week treatment intervals and tacrolimus ointment were similar in total costs and efficacy ($1317 vs $1323 for 194 vs 190 disease-controlled days, respectively). Although primary drug costs were higher for patients treated with tacrolimus ointment, patients treated with regimens of HPTCs incurred higher secondary drug costs.

CONCLUSION

In the base case analyses, tacrolimus ointment was more cost-effective than HPTCs administered in 2-week treatment cycles, and similar in cost-effectiveness to 4-week cycles of HPTCs.

Tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of psoriasis on the face and intertriginous areas

The safety and efficacy of 0.1% tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of psoriasis on the face, intertriginous areas, or both were evaluated in an open-label, clinical trial of 21 patients with psoriasis. Patients applied 0.1% tacrolimus ointment twice daily for 8 weeks. Efficacy was assessed through the investigator's evaluation of the individual signs and symptoms of psoriasis, and the physician's global evaluation of change in disease status. Assessments of cutaneous atrophy and other adverse events were made throughout the study to evaluate the safety of tacrolimus ointment. A total of 21 patients were enrolled in the study; 21 patients at least 18 years of age received study medication. Statistically significant improvement in the physician's assessment of the individual signs and symptoms was observed during the study. A total of 81% of patients (17 of 21) experienced complete clearance at day 57 (end of treatment). Only 2 patients reported adverse events, which were limited to itching and the feeling of warmth at the application site. None of the patients had atrophy, telangiectasia, or striae develop during the study. In summary, tacrolimus 0.1% ointment may be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with psoriasis on the face, intertriginous areas, or both.

Tacrolimus ointment for the management of atopic dermatitis

The management of atopic dermatitis is set for a major shift with the introduction of the first new topical treatment for the condition in 40 years--the non-steroidal topical immunomodulator tacrolimus (Protopic). Backed by strong clinical data, tacrolimus ointment is a valuable addition to topical steroids in the management of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.

Atopic dermatitis and asthma: parallels in the evolution of treatment

OBJECTIVES

To review epidemiologic correlations between asthma and atopic dermatitis (AD), identify common features in disease pathophysiology, and review steps involved in the development of asthma therapy guidelines to assess the appropriateness of a similar process and approach for AD.

METHODS

A 7-member panel representing specialists in dermatology, allergy, asthma, immunology, and pediatrics from around the United States convened to review the current literature and evolving data on AD. Participants presented reviews to the panel on the epidemiology of asthma and AD, the genetic predisposition to allergic disease, the current understanding of the immunopathophysiology of AD, interrelationships between the pathologic pathways of asthma and AD, evolving treatment concepts and options in AD, and the applicability of the asthma treatment model and how it may be adapted for guideline development for AD. Commentary and criticism were recorded for use in document preparation.

RESULTS

There are clear epidemiologic parallels in asthma and AD. Importantly, AD frequently is the first manifestation of an atopic diathesis, which occurs in genetically predisposed individuals and also includes asthma and allergic rhinitis. Up to 80% of children with AD will eventually develop allergic rhinitis or asthma later in childhood. This classic "atopic triad" has numerous pathophysiologic elements in common, including cyclic nucleotide regulatory abnormalities, immune cell alterations, and inflammatory mediators and allergic triggers. New therapeutic options that target underlying immune mechanisms are available, and their place among treatments for AD is becoming established. Guidelines of care have been developed for asthma. The panel noted that the National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guidelines for diagnosis and management of asthma, first issued in 1991, had a tremendous positive impact on many aspects of asthma treatment. It not only created a heightened awareness that asthma is a disease of chronic inflammation, but it also provided unified approaches for therapy and opened new areas of basic science and clinical research. In addition, the guidelines spurred interactions among physicians of various specialties and stimulated a great quantity of research in asthma therapy. It is anticipated that AD therapy guidelines would have similar positive outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The panel concluded that, on the basis of current information and evolving therapeutic options, a clear rationale exists to support AD guideline development. The many parallels between AD and asthma suggest that processes and approaches used for the asthma therapy guidelines would be appropriate for AD.

Atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis is a highly pruritic chronic inflammatory skin disorder affecting 10-20% of children worldwide. Symptoms can persist or begin in adulthood. It is also the most common cause of occupational skin disease in adults. This disease results from an interaction between susceptibility genes, the host's environment, pharmacological abnormalities, skin barrier defects, and immunological factors. New management approaches have evolved from advances in our understanding of the pathobiology of this common skin disorder.

Treatment of atopic dermatitis and impact on quality of life: a review with emphasis on topical non-corticosteroids

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic skin disease with increasing prevalence and rising costs. Stigmatisation and pruritus are only some aspects of potential quality-of-life (QOL) impairments. AD is not curable and repeated treatments are often necessary. At present, treatment with topically-applied corticosteroids is state-of-the-art for mild to moderate flare-ups. However, many patients are worried about the use of corticosteroids due to the widespread fear of adverse effects. In this review the present literature is analysed concerning impact on quality of life for topically-applicable alternatives to the state-of-the-art treatment. For comparison reasons, data from other treatment modalities are additionally given. Characteristics of studies were analysed using 'general' (year and mode of publication, type and aim of study, number of patients, and clinical measurement) and 'QOL specific' criteria (type and number of QOL measurements including relevance for study aim and age group, validation in used language, sensitivity to change, and improvement at end of study). QOL data are published only in the minority of studies evaluating treatment efficacy and do not cover the variety of possible therapies. Data are available for tacrolimus, pimecrolimus, UVA/UVB combination and UVB narrowband (topical non-corticosteroidal treatments), as well as for topical corticosteroids, cyclosporin, and inpatient treatment. All studies provided a marked improvement in quality of life after therapy. One study assessed quality of life after a treatment-free follow-up period obtaining a clear increase in impact on quality of life. Since studies used different QOL measurements and vary in inclusion criteria, treatment schedules and presentation of results, a comparison of QOL improvement is not recommended. A single randomised study compared topically applied non-corticosteroidal treatment (UVA/UVB combination) with another treatment modality (cyclosporin) and found no difference in QOL improvement. At present, there is a clear lack of controlled randomised studies evaluating different active treatment modalities and their impact on quality of life. Consensus meetings are desirable to formulate guidelines for the selection and correct use of QOL measurements. Patients' fear of side effects (e.g. concerning corticosteroids) should be integrated in QOL questionnaires for evaluation of possible compliance problems and real costs. Since relapse after treatment is frequent in AD, QOL measurements should also be performed after a treatment-free follow-up period. At present, we can not answer the question 'which treatment best improves quality of life in AD?'.

Tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of atopic dermatitis is not associated with an increase in cutaneous infections

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of cutaneous infection in patients with atopic dermatitis treated with tacrolimus ointment.

METHODS

Data for 1554 patients with atopic dermatitis, treated with tacrolimus ointment in 5 clinical trials, were analyzed.

RESULTS

In 3 controlled studies, the 12-week adjusted incidence of all cutaneous infections in patients treated with the vehicle, 0.03%, and 0.1% tacrolimus ointment, respectively, was 18.0%, 24.8%, and 17.7% for adult patients, and 20.9%, 19.6%, and 23.6% for pediatric patients. The incidence of any individual cutaneous infection was not significantly higher in the tacrolimus group than in the vehicle group, with the exception of folliculitis in adults. In two open-label studies, there was no evidence of an increased risk of cutaneous infections with long-term use of 0.1% tacrolimus ointment (up to 1 year), based on the incidence of adverse events, incidence by cumulative length of exposure, or hazard rates.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with tacrolimus ointment (0.03% or 0.1%) does not increase the risk of cutaneous bacterial, viral, or fungal infections in patients with atopic dermatitis.

Tacrolimus ointment. A review of its therapeutic potential as a topical therapy in atopic dermatitis

Tacrolimus, a macrolide immunomodulator, is believed to control atopic dermatitis by inhibiting T lymphocyte activation, altering cell surface expression on antigen-presenting dendritic cells and modulating the release of inflammatory mediators from skin mast cells and basophils. Tacrolimus ointment penetrates human skin with no systemic accumulation after repeated applications; systemic absorption is generally low, with most patients in clinical trials having blood concentrations of the drug below the limit of quantification. Moderate to severe atopic dermatitis significantly improved (measured using multiple end-points, including > or = 90% improvement in Physician's Global Evaluation of Clinical Response) with tacrolimus 0.03 and 0.1% ointment compared with vehicle in both adult (n = 304 and 328) and pediatric (n = 351) patients in three 12-week, double-blind, randomized, phase III trials. In adults, tacrolimus ointment was effective therapy for the treatment of atopic dermatitis on all skin regions, including the head and neck. The 0.1% concentration was more effective than the 0.03% concentration. Clinical improvement in moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in adult (n = 316) or pediatric (n = 255) patients was seen as early as week 1, and improvement continued and/or was maintained for up to 6 and/or 12 months in long-term studies. The 0.1% formulation was also effective and well tolerated for up to 2 years. Tacrolimus 0.03 and 0.1% ointment was associated with significant quality-of-life benefit in adults, children (aged 5 to 15 years) and toddlers (aged 2 to 4 years) with atopic dermatitis in 12-week phase III trials (n = 985). Skin burning and pruritus were the most common application site adverse events in adult and pediatric patients in short-term and long-term trials. These events were generally of short duration and mild or moderate severity. Cutaneous infections occurred with a similar incidence after treatment with tacrolimus ointment to that seen after vehicle in short-term trials.

CONCLUSION

Both short- and long-term monotherapy with tacrolimus 0.03 and 0.1% ointment improves moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in adult and pediatric patients. Topical tacrolimus ointment is well tolerated, with the majority of adverse events being localized, transient in nature and of mild or moderate severity. Tacrolimus ointment provides a promising addition to the currently available treatments for atopic dermatitis; it can be used as a short- or long-term intermittent therapy for moderate to severe disease, including disease on the head or neck, in adult (0.1 and 0.03% formulations) and pediatric (0.03% formulation) patients who are not adequately responsive to or are intolerant of conventional treatments.

[New horizons in the treatment of atopic dermatitis]

Nearly fifty years after their introduction, corticoids continue to be one of the main pillars of dermatological therapy in general and in atopic dermatitis in particular. However, their use is limited by local and systemic adverse effects.There is enormous demand for anti-inflammatory agents not belonging to the corticoid group that would be useful in the different inflammatory dermatoses.In the last few years the therapeutic arsenal for atopic dermatitis has increased with two distinct groups of drugs: topical immunomodulators and leukotriene inhibitors. Both groups of drugs are new and new compounds belonging to these types of drugs will probably appear in the next few years.Among the alternatives to corticoids are the immunomodulators and the most promising of these are macrolide antibiotics. Tacrolimus (FK 506) and pimecrolimus (ASM 981) belong to this group of substances with a high capacity to inhibit T lymphocyte activation. Although they also act on other cells playing a role in atopic dermatitis (mastocytes, Langerhans' cells, B lymphocytes) their action on T lymphocytes seems to be the most important. In T lymphocytes, these drugs act by inhibiting the action of calmodulin, a vital enzyme in the activation chain of these cells that ends in the production of interleukin 2 and other proinflammatory cytokines.The accumulated evidence of the various publications seems to indicate that tacrolimus is a safe and effective treatment of atopic dermatitis in patients aged 2 years or more. The drug was approved for clinical use 3 years ago in Japan and more than 1 year ago in the United States. The number of randomized clinical trials comparing this drug with placebo or various corticoids demonstrate that its action is overwhelming. Its anti-inflammatory action is similar to that of high-potency topical corticoids. Two doses daily are required and the drug has been tested in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Published data from more than 10,000 patients guarantee its safety. The most frequent short-term adverse effect is a burning sensation in the site of application lasting a few minutes.Pimecrolimus has not yet been commercialized in any country and is currently undergoing phase III clinical investigations. It has been tested in three clinical trials in patients aged more than 3 months old with mild-moderate atopic dermatitis. Its safety profile is good and similar to that of tacrolimus.The number and quality of the data provided by studies of treatment with leukotriene inhibitors (zafirlukast, montelukast and zileuton) is much lower but these substances seem to warrant further investigation. Only five small series undergoing treatment with these products have been published.

Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment compared with that of hydrocortisone butyrate ointment in adult patients with atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Vehicle-controlled studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment for patients with atopic dermatitis.

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to compare 0.03% and 0.1% tacrolimus ointment with 0.1% hydrocortisone-17-butyrate ointment, a midpotent to potent topical corticosteroid, in the treatment of adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.

METHODS

Patients applied ointment twice daily to all affected areas for 3 weeks in this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. The primary endpoint was the modified eczema area and severity index (mEASI) mean area under the curve as a percentage of baseline.

RESULTS

Five hundred seventy patients were randomized and received treatment. Discontinuations included 22 of 193 patients from the 0.03% tacrolimus group, 22 of 191 patients from the 0.1% tacrolimus group, and 17 of 186 patients from the hydrocortisone butyrate group. The median mEASI mean area under the curve as a percentage of baseline was 47.0%, 36.5%, and 36.1% for patients who received 0.03% tacrolimus, 0.1% tacrolimus, and 0.1% hydrocortisone butyrate, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between 0.1% tacrolimus and 0.1% hydrocortisone butyrate; however, the lower improvement in mEASI for 0.03% tacrolimus was statistically significant when compared with 0.1% tacrolimus (P <.001) or hydrocortisone butyrate (P =.002). Skin burning and pruritus at the application site showed a higher incidence in the tacrolimus treatment groups than in the hydrocortisone butyrate group (P <.05). Laboratory parameters showed no treatment differences and no marked changes over time.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of 0.1% tacrolimus ointment was similar to that of 0.1% hydrocortisone butyrate ointment and was lower for 0.03% tacrolimus ointment. No serious safety concerns were identified.

Tacrolimus: a review of its use for the management of dermatoses

The newly developed immunomodulator tacrolimus (FK506) is the first of a new class of agents that have enormous potential to change the way that dermatoses are treated and managed. Tacrolimus has been found to be active in a topical formulation with the latter exerting its effects by acting on the signal transduction pathways inside T cells and inhibiting gene transcription. The result is decreased responsiveness of T cells to antigens. Percutaneous absorption of tacrolimus is higher in diseased skin as opposed to healthy skin and, therefore, the drug will be taken in at progressively lower quantities as lesions heal. There is limited systemic absorption of tacrolimus over the course of therapy. The most extensive experience with tacrolimus has been in treating atopic dermatitis. In numerous trials, tacrolimus ointment 0.03-0.3% has shown to be effective in reducing the symptoms and severity of atopic dermatitis in adults and the paediatric population. Furthermore, there have been no significant toxic effects associated with topical therapy with tacrolimus. The most common complaint is that of local irritation after applying the ointment. This is generally transient and the patient is able to continue with therapy. The other dermatoses where tacrolimus has been used include contact dermatitis, psoriasis and pyoderma gangrenosum.

Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment compared with that of hydrocortisone acetate ointment in children with atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Vehicle-controlled studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment in the treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD).

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to compare 0.03% and 0.1% tacrolimus ointment with 1% hydrocortisone acetate ointment in children 2 to 15 years of age with moderate-to-severe AD.

METHODS

Treatment was twice daily to affected areas for 3 weeks in this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. The primary endpoint was the modified eczema area and severity index (mEASI) mean area under the curve (mAUC) as a percentage of baseline.

RESULTS

Five hundred sixty patients were randomized and received at least one application of ointment. Discontinuations included 21 of 189 patients from the 0.03% tacrolimus group, 13 of 186 patients from the 0.1% tacrolimus group, and 20 of 185 patients from the hydrocortisone acetate group. The median mEASI mAUC as a percentage of baseline showed 0.03% and 0.1% tacrolimus to be significantly more effective than 1% hydrocortisone acetate (P <.001) and 0.1% tacrolimus to be more effective than 0.03% tacrolimus (P =.006). The mEASI mAUC as a percentage of baseline was 44.8%, 39.8%, and 64.0% for patients who received 0.03% tacrolimus, 0.1% tacrolimus, and 1% hydrocortisone acetate, respectively. Transient skin burning was the only adverse event to show a higher incidence in the tacrolimus treatment groups than in the hydrocortisone acetate group (P <.05). Laboratory parameters showed no treatment differences and no marked changes over time.

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus, 0.03% and 0.1%, was significantly more effective than 1% hydrocortisone acetate and 0.1% tacrolimus was more effective than 0.03% tacrolimus in the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD in children. No safety concerns were identified.

Tacrolimus and pimecrolimus: from clever prokaryotes to inhibiting calcineurin and treating atopic dermatitis

Tacrolimus ointment, a topical inhibitor of the phosphatase calcineurin, has recently been approved in the United States for use in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. It is the first topical immune suppressant that is not one of the hydrocortisone derivatives, important allies in dermatology for nearly 50 years. Although tacrolimus is less able to penetrate thick skin than glucocorticoids, it does not cause dermal atrophy, an important advantage over the hydrocortisone class. Pimecrolimus (ASM 981), a newer calcineurin inhibitor closely related to tacrolimus, is also being developed for atopic dermatitis therapy. Pimecrolimus has an altered skin penetration profile but the same mechanism of action as tacrolimus. In this review we chronicle the discovery of the calcineurin inhibitors, their presumed evolutionary role as a bacterial "smart bomb" against fungi, molecular and cellular mechanisms of action in the immune system, systemic and topical side effects, efficacy in atopic dermatitis, and future applications within the specialty of dermatology. Particular attention is given to the issues of systemic absorption of tacrolimus, the conditions in which absorption can become a concern, efficacy relative to glucocorticoids, and the choice of 0.03% or 0.1% tacrolimus ointment for use in adults and children.

Recent advances in dermatology

Novel therapies for dermatologic diseases are now widely available to the clinician. The topical immune modulators tacrolimus and pimecrolimus are likely to change the way in which inflammatory dermatoses are treated. Antiviral and antitumor effects of imiquimod, another immune-response modifier, are being studied to determine the ways in which it may affect the treatment of cutaneous viral infections and skin cancers. New topical treatments for onychomycosis and the current lack of effective treatments for nondermatophyte onychomycosis indicate the need for more effective treatment for this common disease. Exciting developments in skin substitutes and growth factors for acute and chronic wound care hold much promise for the future.

Tacrolimus clinical studies for atopic dermatitis and other conditions

The first topical immunomodulator approved for human use, tacrolimus ointment (Protopic, Fujisawa, Healthcare, Inc, Deerfield, IL), has been shown to be effective and safe in the treatment of children (aged 2 years and older) and adults with atopic dermatitis (AD). Clinical trials conducted worldwide have involved 12,000 patients, with safety and efficacy data available for up to 3 years of treatment. In addition to its beneficial effects in the management of AD, topical tacrolimus has also been reported to be of benefit in other immunologically mediated skin diseases including: hand dermatitis, contact dermatitis, eyelid dermatitis, erosive lichen planus, steroid-induced rosacea, pyoderma gangrenosum, and graft-versus-host disease. This article reviews the clinical experience of topical tacrolimus in the treatment of AD and other skin conditions.

Topical tacrolimus for the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases

Chronic inflammatory skin disorders, such as atopic eczema, can cause considerable impairment of life quality. Their treatment is mainly driven by systemic or topical glucocorticosteroids which have the risk of many side effects. Recently, immunosuppressive macrolides which act via the inhibition of cytokine expression in T-lymphocytes have been shown to exert good therapeutic potency in inflammatory skin disorders. Cyclosporin, widely used in transplantation medicine, is also effective in psoriasis and atopic eczema but is not suitable for topical treatment. Tacrolimus (FK506) has been found to be 10-100 times more potent than cyclosporin and to penetrate skin much better due to a lower molecular weight. Initial clinical investigations have shown efficacy of topical tacrolimus in patients with atopic eczema. Large multi-centre studies have proven that long-term therapy with 0.03% and 0.1% tacrolimus ointment reveals effectiveness and safety both in adults and in children with severe atopic eczema. A burning sensation at the site of application is the most frequently observed local side effect. Relevant systemic adverse events were not detected. In Japan and the US, the drug is already licensed for the treatment of atopic eczema. The European admission for the pharmaceutical market is expected in the year 2002. Tacrolimus represents a milestone in topical therapy of inflammatory skin disorders which has so far been dominated by corticosteroid formulations and gives hope for the development of further topical immunosuppressive agents of its class in the future.

The eczema area and severity index (EASI): assessment of reliability in atopic dermatitis. EASI Evaluator Group

OBJECTIVE

To test the reliability of the eczema area and severity index (EASI) scoring system by assessing inter- and intra-observer consistency.

DESIGN

Training of evaluators, application, and assessment over 2 consecutive days.

SETTING

An academic center.

PATIENTS

Twenty adults and children with atopic dermatitis (AD); cohort 1 (10 patients > or = 8 years) and cohort 2 (10 patients < 8 years).

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The EASI was used by 15 dermatologist evaluators to assess atopic dermatitis in cohort 1 and cohort 2 on 2 consecutive days. Inter- and intraobserver reliability were analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall intra-evaluator reliability of the EASI was in the fair-to-good range. Inter-evaluator reliability analyses indicated that the evaluators assessed the patients consistently across both study days.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that the EASI can be learned quickly and utilized reliably in the assessment of severity and extent of AD. There was consistency among the evaluators between consecutive days of evaluation. These results support the use of the EASI in clinical trials of therapeutic agents for AD.