Mouse digit tip regeneration is mediated by fate-restricted progenitor cells

Cytoskeletal regulation of dermal regeneration

Wound healing results in the repair of injured tissues however fibrosis and scar formation are, more often than not the unfortunate consequence of this process. The ability of lower order vertebrates and invertebrates to regenerate limbs and tissues has been all but lost in mammals; however, there are some instances where glimpses of mammalian regenerative capacity do exist. Here we describe the unlocked potential that exists in mammals that may help us understand the process of regeneration post-injury and highlight the potential role of the actin cytoskeleton in this process. The precise function and regulation of the cytoskeleton is critical to the success of the healing process and its manipulation may therefore facilitate regenerative healing. The gelsolin family of actin remodelling proteins in particular has been shown to have important functions in wound healing and family member Flightless I (Flii) is involved in both regeneration and repair. Understanding the interactions between different cytoskeletal proteins and their dynamic control of processes including cellular adhesion, contraction and motility may assist the development of therapeutics that will stimulate regeneration rather than repair.

Regeneration and reprogramming

Recent reprogramming studies indicate that mammalian, somatic cells have the potential to achieve pluripotent states and undergo cell type switching. Such cellular traits are observed under natural conditions in animals that regenerate complex organs. A number of invertebrates display the amazing trait of whole body regeneration. Underlying this trait is the maintenance of pluripotent cells in somatic tissue, and molecular studies indicate the use of common players associated with pluripotency and germ cell properties between these invertebrates and mammalian pluripotent cells. In regenerative vertebrates, heart regeneration, lens regeneration, and retinal regeneration provide good examples of dedifferentiation and transdifferentiation. The molecular factors associated with these phenomena are discussed.

BMP2 induces segment-specific skeletal regeneration from digit and limb amputations by establishing a new endochondral ossification center

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are required for bone development, the repair of damage skeletal tissue, and the regeneration of the mouse digit tip. Previously we showed that BMP treatment can induce a regeneration response in mouse digits amputated at a proximal level of the terminal phalangeal element (P3) (Yu et al., 2010). In this study, we show that the regeneration-inductive ability of BMP2 extends to amputations at the level of the second phalangeal element (P2) of neonatal digits, and the hindlimb of adult limbs. In these models the induced regenerative response is restricted in a segment-specific manner, thus amputated skeletal elements regenerate distally patterned skeletal structures but does not form joints or more distal skeletal elements. Studies on P2 amputations indicate that BMP2-induced regeneration is associated with a localized proliferative response and the transient expression of established digit blastema marker genes. This is followed by the formation of a new endochondral ossification center at the distal end of the bone stump. The endochondral ossification center contains proliferating chondrocytes that establish a distal proliferative zone and differentiate proximally into hypertrophic chondrocytes. Skeletal regeneration occurs from proximal to distal with the appearance of osteoblasts that differentiate in continuity with the amputated stump. Using the polarity of the endochondral ossification centers induced by BMP2 at two different amputation levels, we show that BMP2 activates a level-dependent regenerative response indicative of a positional information network. In summary, our studies provide evidence that BMP2 induces the regeneration of mammalian limb structures by stimulating a new endochondral ossification center that utilizes an existing network of positional information to regulate patterning during skeletal regeneration.

Salamanders and fish can regenerate lost structures--why can't we?

The recent introduction of in vivo lineage-tracing techniques using fluorescently labeled cells challenged the long-standing view that complete dedifferentiation is a major force driving vertebrate tissue regeneration. The report in BMC Developmental Biology by Juan Carlos Izpisúa Belmonte and colleagues adds a new twist to a rapidly evolving view of the origin of blastemal cells. As classic and recent experimental findings are considered together, a new perspective on vertebrate muscle regeneration is emerging.

See research article http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-213X/12/9

Barx homeobox family in muscle development and regeneration

Homeobox transcription factors are key intrinsic regulators of myogenesis. In studies spanning several years, we have characterized the homeobox factor Barx2 as a novel marker for muscle progenitor cells and an important regulator of muscle growth and repair. In this review, we place the expression and function of Barx2 and its paralogue Barx1 in context with other muscle-expressed homeobox factors in both embryonic and adult myogenesis. We also describe the structure and regulation of Barx genes and possible gene/disease associations. The functional domains of Barx proteins, their molecular interactions, and cellular functions are presented with particular emphasis on control of genes and processes involved in myogenic differentiation. Finally, we describe the patterns of Barx gene expression in vivo and the phenotypes of various Barx gene perturbation models including null mice. We focus on the Barx2 null mouse model, which has demonstrated the critical roles of Barx2 in postnatal myogenesis including muscle maintenance during aging, and regeneration of acute and chronic muscle injury.