Adenovirus-mediated interleukin-12 gene therapy for metastatic colon carcinoma

Cancer gene therapy using a replication-competent herpes simplex virus type 1 vector

OBJECTIVE

The authors investigate the efficacy of hrR3, a viral vector derived from herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV 1), in destroying colon carcinoma cells in vitro and in vivo. The effect of adding the prodrug ganciclovir in combination with hrR3 infection also is assessed.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Most cancer gene therapy strategies use viral vectors that are incapable of replication. The HSV 1 vector hrR3 is capable of replication, and its replication is cytotoxic to cells. hrR3 also possesses the HSV-thymidine kinase gene, which converts ganciclovir into a toxic metabolite. Thus, the addition of ganciclovir to hrR3-infected cells may enhance the ability of hrR3 to destroy tumor cells. To increase specificity for tumor cells, hrR3 has a mutated ribonucleotide reductase gene and replicates selectively in cells with high levels of endogenous rbonucleotide reductase. Actively dividing cells such as tumor cells have high levels of endogenous ribonucleotide reductase for synthesis of DNA precursors. The authors are interested in the use of HSV 1 vectors to treat liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Ribonucleotide reductase expression in several colon carcinoma cell lines and in primary cultures of human hepatocytes was determined by Western blot analysis. hrR3-mediated cytotoxicity in the colon carcinoma cell lines was determined using an in vitro assay. The human colon carcinoma cell line HT29 was injected into the flanks of nude mice followed by intratumoral injection of hrR3. Tumor growth rate was assessed with and without the addition of intraperitoneal ganciclovir.

RESULTS

Ribonucleotide reductase levels in colon carcinoma cell lines are much higher than in primary cultures of human hepatocytes. hrR3 efficiently destroys colon carcinoma cell lines in vitro. A single intratumoral injection of hrR3 into HT29 flank tumors significantly reduces tumor growth rate, and the administration of ganciclovir has no additive effect.

CONCLUSIONS

The inherent cytotoxicity of hrR3 replication effectively destroys colon carcinoma cells in vitro and in vivo. This cytotoxicity is not enhanced in vivo by the addition of ganciclovir. In the future, more efficacious and selective HSV 1 vectors may be useful in the treatment of cancer.

Experimental vaccine strategies for cancer immunotherapy

Recently, cancer immunotherapy has emerged as a therapeutic option for the management of cancer patients. This is based on the fact that our immune system, once activated, is capable of developing specific immunity against neoplastic but not normal cells. Increasing evidence suggests that cell-mediated immunity, particularly T-cell-mediated immunity, is important for the control of tumor cells. Several experimental vaccine strategies have been developed to enhance cell-mediated immunity against tumors. Some of these tumor vaccines have generated promising results in murine tumor systems. In addition, several phase I/II clinical trials using these vaccine strategies have shown extremely encouraging results in patients. In this review, we will discuss many of these promising cancer vaccine strategies. We will pay particular attention to the strategies employing dendritic cells, the central player for tumor vaccine development.

Gene therapy for colon cancer

The enormous number of newly diagnosed cases of colorectal cancer that occur each year and the lack of agents that are highly effective for all patients underscore the need for novel approaches to combating the disease. Gene therapy as a developing treatment modality is already well established, with a number of trials ongoing and a vast range of other approaches being assessed in animal and cell culture experiments. In this brief review, we have discussed five gene therapy trials in colon carcinoma that are ongoing or in the approval process in the United States. The gene therapy approaches being employed can be divided into three major categories: (1) enzyme/prodrug systems (HSVtk/ganciclovir; CD/5-fluorocytosine); (2) tumor suppressor gene replacement therapy with wild-type p53; and (3) immune-gene therapy which is based on cytokine or tumor antigen expression to induce tumor immunity (e.g., CEA). Replication-deficient recombinant adenoviral vectors are predominantly used for colon cancer gene therapy, because they can be produced at high titer and they readily infect a number of different cell types. One trial uses polynucleotide therapy for antitumor immunization with intramuscular injection. All of these studies are phase I trials, principally designed to evaluate safety, but they will also provide data on gene delivery. Some trials may provide some insight into potential therapeutic effects. We have alluded to some of the concerns on toxicity related to the use of adenovirus, risks and side effects from transgenes, lack of tumor-specificity of transgene expression, and potential problems with efficient gene delivery to solid tumors. The clinical trials, however, will provide insight that will inform design of future studies with respect to dose, form, and frequency of administration, as well as to the value of biologic and clinical endpoints. The molecular analysis of the fundamental basis of colon cancer has moved at a remarkable pace and that progress seems set to continue. Thus, the basic foundations for gene therapy are undoubtedly in place: a clinical need; growing understanding of basic tumor biology; and ever-improving delivery systems. The field is at a very early stage in its evolution, and one concern is that the considerable hurdles that must be overcome are seen as examples of the failure of cancer gene therapy; however, we believe these challenges will be overcome. The authors also believe that colon cancer gene therapy is likely to take new directions, such as use as adjuvant to radical surgery, rather than attempts to treat end-stage disease when the liver is replaced by metastases. Other new directions might include prophylactic gene-based immunization against a panel of well-characterized tumor antigens, at least for persons shown to be at high risk of colon cancer because of genetic or other predisposition. A marriage between gene therapy approaches and conventional anticancer treatments such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy also seems likely. There is already evidence of this move with demonstration of synergism between p53 replacement and radiotherapy and chemotherapy. It is also likely that therapies will be developed that combine elements from the cancer gene therapies discussed previously, namely, suicide gene transfer, immune modulation, and modulation of defective cancer genes. Perhaps one of the main concerns is not that researchers in cancer gene therapy want to walk before they can run, but that the public and government agencies believe they can. The next 10 years will be an interesting time in the development of novel treatments against colon cancer.

Optimal scheduling of interleukin-12 and fractionated radiation therapy in the murine Lewis lung carcinoma

Interleukin-12 (IL-12), a naturally occurring cytokine, has demonstrated antitumor activity in several murine solid tumors. The Lewis lung carcinoma was used to study the most effective scheduling of recombinant murine interleukin-12 (rmIL-12) administration with fractionated radiation therapy. The effect of the schedule of rmIL-12 administration alone or along with a 1- or 2-week fractionated radiation therapy regimen was examined. Beginning rmIL-12 prior to or at the same time as radiation therapy and extending rmIL-12 through the radiation regimen and beyond produced the longest tumor growth delays. Those treatment regimens which were most effective against the primary tumor were also most effective in decreasing the number of lung metastases on day 20. To further assess the immunotherapeutic effects from rmIL-12 administration, the efficacy of rmIL-12 with fractionated radiation therapy delivered to a right hind-limb tumor was measured as tumor growth delay in an unirradiated left hind-limb tumor. There was some difference in the tumor growth delay between the unirradiated tumor in the animals bearing an irradiated tumor in the contralateral leg, and the tumors in animals receiving rmIL-12 only. Recombinant murine granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor (rmGM-CSF) was also an antitumor agent active against the Lewis lung carcinoma and produced an additive effect in combination with fractionated radiation therapy in this tumor. rmIL-12 was a radiation sensitizer in the Lewis lung carcinoma. When rmIL-12 (45-microg/kg) and rmGM-CSF (45 microg/kg) were administered together with fractionated radiation therapy, a marked increase in tumor growth delay resulted. This treatment combination also nearly ablated lung metastases on day 20 in these animals. These results may serve as a useful guide in developing clinical protocols, including rmIL-12 and fractionated radiation therapy.

Targeted delivery of plasmid DNA complexed with galactosylated poly(L-lysine)

Galactose was introduced to poly(L-lysine) (PLL) with an average molecular weight of 13,000 to develop a hepatocyte-specific carrier for gene drugs. The pharmacokinetic characteristics of a model plasmid, pCAT (plasmid DNA encoding chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter gene), complexed with galactosylated PLL (Gal-PLL) was studied in mice in relation to its physicochemical properties. pCAT/Gal-PLL complex at a ratio of 1:0.6 (w/w) has a zeta potential of -20 mV and a mean particle size of about 180 nm. After intravenous injection, [32P]pCAT/Gal-PLL was rapidly eliminated from the circulation and preferentially taken up by the liver's parenchymal cells. The hepatic uptake of [32P]pCAT/Gal-PLL was significantly inhibited by prior administration of Gal-bovine serum albumin, suggesting that the uptake was mediated by the asialoglycoprotein receptors on hepatocytes. In vitro transfection experiments using a hepatoma cell line expressing the asialoglycoprotein receptor revealed that pCAT/Gal-PLL gave a high CAT gene expression whereas pCAT complexed with unmodified PLL failed to transfect the cells.

Cell to cell contact is not required for bystander cell killing by Escherichia coli purine nucleoside phosphorylase

Expression of Escherichia coli purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP) activates prodrugs and kills entire populations of mammalian cells, even when as few as 1% of the cells express this gene. This phenomenon of bystander killing has been previously investigated for herpes simplex virus-thymidine kinase (HSV-TK) and has been shown to require cell to cell contact. Using silicon rings to separate E. coli PNP expressing cells from non-expressing cells sharing the same medium, we demonstrate that bystander cell killing by E. coli PNP does not require cell-cell contact. Initially, cells expressing E. coli PNP convert the non-toxic prodrug, 6-methylpurine-2'-deoxyriboside (MeP-dR) to the highly toxic membrane permeable toxin, 6-methylpurine (MeP). As the expressing cells die, E. coli PNP is released into the culture medium, retains activity, and continues precursor conversion extracellularly (as determined by reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography of both prodrug and toxin). Bystander killing can also be observed in the absence of extracellular E. coli PNP by removing the MeP-dR prior to death of the expressing cells. In this case, 100% of cultured cells die when as few as 3% of the cells of a population express E. coli PNP. Blocking nucleoside transport with nitrobenzylthioinosine reduces MeP-dR mediated cell killing but not MeP cell killing. These mechanisms differ fundamentally from those previously reported for the HSV-TK gene.