Processive DNA helicase activity of the minichromosome maintenance proteins 4, 6, and 7 complex requires forked DNA structures

The zinc finger domain of the archaeal minichromosome maintenance protein is required for helicase activity

The minichromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins, a family of six conserved polypeptides found in all eukaryotes, are essential for DNA replication. The archaeon Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum Delta H contains a single homologue of MCM with biochemical properties similar to those of the eukaryotic enzyme. The amino acid sequence of the archaeal protein contains a putative zinc-binding domain of the CX(2)CX(n)CX(2)C (C(4)) type. In this study, the roles of the zinc finger domain in MCM function were examined using recombinant wild-type and mutant proteins expressed and purified from Escherichia coli. The protein with a mutation in the zinc motif forms a dodecameric complex similar to the wild-type enzyme. The mutant enzyme, however, is impaired in DNA-dependent ATPase activity and single-stranded DNA binding, and it does not possess helicase activity. These results illustrate the importance of the zinc-binding domain for archaeal MCM function and suggest a role for zinc binding in the eukaryotic MCM complex as well, since four out of the six eukaryotic MCM proteins contain a similar zinc-binding motif.

Nearest neighbour analysis of MCM protein complexes in Drosophila melanogaster

The MCM proteins are a group of six proteins whose action is vital for DNA replication in eukaryotes. It has been suggested that they constitute the replicative helicase, with a subset of the proteins forming the catalytic helicase (MCM4,6,7) while the others have a loading or control function. In this paper we show that all six MCM proteins are present in equivalent amounts in soluble extracts and on chromatin. We have also analysed soluble and chromatin-associated MCM protein complexes under different conditions. This suggests that all six MCM proteins are always found in a complex with each other, although the interaction between the individual MCM proteins is not equivalent as stringent salt conditions are able to break the intact complex into a number of stable subcomplexes. These data contribute to the ongoing debate about the nature of MCM complexes, supporting the hypothesis that they act as a heterohexamer rather than as a number of different subcomplexes. Finally, using protein-protein cross-linking we have shown that MCM2 interacts directly with MCM5 and MCM6; MCM5 with MCM3 and MCM2; and MCM6 with MCM2 and MCM4. This provides the first direct information about specific subunit contacts in the MCM complex.

Biochemical activities associated with mouse Mcm2 protein

Mcm2, a member of the Mcm2-7 protein family essential for the initiation of DNA replication, has several biochemical activities including the ability to inhibit the Mcm4,6,7 helicase. In this study, we characterized the activities associated with Mcm2 and determined the region required for them. It was found that Mcm2 deleted at an amino-terminal portion is able to bind to an Mcm4,6,7 hexameric complex and to inhibit its DNA helicase activity. The same deletion mutant of Mcm2 and the carboxyl-terminal half of Mcm2 were both able to bind to Mcm4, suggesting that the carboxyl-half of Mcm2 binds to Mcm4 to disassemble the Mcm4,6,7 hexamer. Phosphorylation of Mcm2,4,6,7 complexes with Cdc7 kinase showed that the amino-terminal region of Mcm2 is required for the phosphorylation, and it contains major Cdc7-mediated phosphorylation sites. We also found that Mcm2 itself can assemble a nucleosome-like structure in vitro in the presence of H3/H4 histones. The amino-terminal region of Mcm2 was required for the activity where a histone-binding domain is located. Finally, we identified a region required for the nuclear localization of Mcm2. The function of Mcm2 is discussed based on these biochemical characteristics.

Interactions between two catalytically distinct MCM subgroups are essential for coordinated ATP hydrolysis and DNA replication

The six MCM (minichromosome maintenance) proteins are essential DNA replication factors that each contain a putative ATP binding motif and together form a heterohexameric complex. We show that these motifs are required for viability in vivo and coordinated ATP hydrolysis in vitro. Mutational analysis discriminates between two functionally distinct MCM protein subgroups: Mcm4p, 6p, and 7p contribute canonical ATP binding motifs essential for catalysis, whereas the related motifs in Mcm2p, 3p, and 5p serve a regulatory function. Reconstitution experiments indicate that specific functional interactions between these two subgroups are required for robust ATP hydrolysis. Our observations show parallels between the MCM complex and the F1-ATPase, and we discuss how ATP hydrolysis by the MCM complex might be coupled to DNA strand separation.

Phosphorylation of Mcm4 at specific sites by cyclin-dependent kinase leads to loss of Mcm4,6,7 helicase activity

Mcm proteins that play an essential role in eukaryotic DNA replication are phosphorylated in vivo, and cyclin-dependent protein kinase is at least in part responsible for the phosphorylation of Mcm4. Our group reported that the DNA helicase activity of Mcm4,6,7 complex, which may be involved in initiation of DNA replication, is inhibited following phosphorylation by Cdk2/cyclin A in vitro. Here, we further examined the interplay between mouse Mcm4,6,7 complex and cyclin-dependent kinases and determined the sites required for the phosphorylation of Mcm4. Six Ser and Thr residues, in all, were required for the phosphorylation. Inhibition of Mcm4,6,7 helicase activity by Cdk2/cyclin A was largely relieved by introducing mutations in these residues of Mcm4. Anti-phosphothreonine antibodies raised against one of these sites reacted with Mcm4 prepared from HeLa cells at mitotic phase but did not bind to those at G(1) and G(1)/S, suggesting that this site is mainly phosphorylated in the mitotic phase. Mcm4,6,7 complex purified from HeLa cells at the mitotic phase exhibited a low level of DNA helicase activity, compared with the complexes prepared from cells at other phases. These results suggest that phosphorylation of Mcm4 at specific sites leads to loss of Mcm4,6,7 DNA helicase activity.