Granulomatous infections due to tumor necrosis factor blockade: correction

Human immunodeficiencies that predispose to intracellular bacterial infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients treated with anti-tumour necrosis factor agents have an increased risk of active tuberculosis. Mycobacteria are bacterial pathogens capable of surviving and multiplying within macrophages; these infections are characterised by granulomatous inflammation. This review addresses the effects of inherited and acquired immunodeficiencies on the susceptibility to the development of intracellular bacterial infections.

RECENT FINDINGS

Primary and secondary immunodeficiencies that result in severely impaired T cell function or macrophage activation result in an increased risk of mycobacterial and Salmonella infection. Conversely, inherited or acquired antibody or complement deficiency does not lead to increased susceptibility to these pathogens. Inherited defects in the interleukin-12/interleukin-23-dependent interferon-gamma pathway due to mutations in genes encoding the p40 chain common to interleukin-12 and interleukin-23, the beta1 chain shared by interleukin-12 and interleukin-23 receptors, interferon-gamma receptor chains 1 or 2, or signal transducer and activator of transcription, predispose to severe infections caused by poorly pathogenic mycobacteria and Salmonella species. Acquired defects of cytokine function causing increased susceptibility to these pathogens include anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy and the generation of interferon-gamma-neutralising autoantibodies. Defective nuclear factor kappaB activation caused by hypomorphic mutations of the nuclear factor kappaB essential modulator gene, which compromises the function of Toll receptors, interleukin-IL receptors, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha receptors, also increases susceptibility to severe mycobacterial infections. Patients with inherited defects in the phagocyte nicotine-adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase system are highly susceptible to Salmonella infections but only exhibit slightly increased susceptibility to mycobacteria.

SUMMARY

Collectively, these observations highlight immune mechanisms that are essential for protection against intracellular bacteria. This information provides clinicians with a framework for investigating patients with potentially life-threatening intracellular bacterial infections.

Tumor necrosis factor and granuloma biology: Explaining the differential infection risk of etanercept and infliximab

Several studies show that the risk of granulomatous infections following therapy with the anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antibody infliximab is higher than after treatment with the soluble TNFRp75 immunoglobulin fusion construct etanercept. Therefore, despite sharing a common target, it is possible that the actual mode of action of the 2 biologicals differs in vivo. TNF is known to participate in the induction and maintenance of protective granulomas at multiple steps, and evidence supporting a differential inhibition of TNF bioactivity and signaling by the 2 drugs is discussed.

TNF-blocking agents and tuberculosis: new drugs illuminate an old topic

Newer TNF blockers (etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab) have contributed greatly to the control of chronic inflammatory disease. Many of the damaging inflammatory mechanisms that they inhibit are, however, important in maintaining tuberculosis in the latent phase (latent tuberculosis infection or LTBI). There is considerable evidence that links reactivation of LTBI to the use of anti-TNF monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatments, which appear to result in disruption of the granuloma that normally compartmentalizes but does not kill Mycobacterium tuberculosis during LTBI. This effect can be explained, in part, by directly neutralizing TNF, which plays a key role in tuberculosis immunity. To the clinician, dealing with LTBI in patients on these medications is an important issue. Prescribers should seek local expert help in this regard, as global LTBI treatment regimens differ. Nonetheless, screening for and treating LTBI will prevent reactivation in most patients. LTBI screening should include a careful history, tuberculin skin test and chest radiograph. Prophylactic treatment (e.g. isoniazid for 9 months) should be offered to patients with LTBI, in accordance with local advice. False-negative tuberculin skin test results can be expected in these patient groups. False-negative skin tests also mean that clinicians cannot be complacent about patients on TNF blockers who lack evidence of LTBI. On the contrary, because tuberculosis disease can be lethal, all treated patients should be advised to seek medical attention if symptoms suggestive of tuberculosis emerge. The indications for these successful agents are expanding, and efficient management of the LTBI issue should improve their safety profile.