Frequency and risk factors of anthracycline-induced clinical heart failure in children: a systematic review

Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma: Maximizing Efficacy and Minimizing Toxicity

Historically, both adult and childhood Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) were treated with full-dose (35-45 Gy) extended-field radiation therapy (RT). Although this treatment was the first to produce reliable disease control, the resulting late toxicity led pediatric oncologists to pioneer the use of combined chemotherapy and low-dose (15-25 Gy) involved-field RT for all stages of HL. Currently, standard treatment of childhood HL is risk adapted; those with favorable risk disease typically receive 2 to 4 cycles of multi-agent chemotherapy with low-dose IFRT, whereas those with higher-risk disease receive more intensive chemotherapy before IFRT. This approach produces long-term survival rates >90% while limiting exposure to anthracyclines, alkylators, and radiation to normal tissues. In contrast to adult HL, IFRT remains an important component of the treatment of advanced-stage HL in pediatric patients. Current clinical trials for children with HL aim to further segregate patients into risk strata such that those who are highly curable can receive less toxic therapy, whereas high-risk patients can receive augmented therapy. Response-adapted therapy, in which overall treatment intensity is modified according to the initial response to chemotherapy, is emerging as a potential means of further reducing therapy for some while maintaining high cure rates. The challenge is to refine therapy in a rare disease in which long-time intervals are necessary to observe an adequate number of events (treatment failure or late effects) to answer judicious questions.

[Sequelae and quality of life in young adult survivors of childhood cancer]

PURPOSE

The long-term survival rate of childhood cancer is around 70%, but cancer- and treatment-related sequelae and the risk of a second malignancy may impair the survivors' quality of life.

METHODS

Fifty-four patients older than 18 years, treated for a cancer between 1988 and 1996, and considered as cured for at least 5 years, were asked to participate. Data on cancer, treatment and sequelae were extracted from the Rhône-Alpes childhood cancer registry and from the medical charts. Health-related quality of life was assessed with the SF-36 scale. Lifestyle, educational level, present occupation, subjective health, and worries were assessed with a detailed questionnaire.

RESULTS

Forty-three young adult patients participated (16 female, 27 male, mean age 23 [range: 18-32]). Primary cancers were leukaemias (35%), lymphomas (19%), solid tumors (34%) and central nervous system tumors (12%). Nine percent of the subjects had received cranio-spinal radiotherapy, and 14% a total body irradiation followed by bone marrow transplantation. Two patients (5%) had developed a second malignancy, 30% have an endocrine insufficiency, 14% have neurological or psychological impairment, and 21% have orthopaedic sequelae. Health-related quality of life of the population as a whole, as assessed by SF-36, is close to normative data published for healthy population of that age. Female gender, certain types of cancer (neuroblastoma, bone tumors and carcinomas), and the presence of endocrine sequelae are predictors of a worse quality of life. Only 3 patients (7%) declared having had to shorten their education because of their cancer; 63% are currently employed, 25% are students or apprentices. Worries about fertility are often mentioned; half of the subjects declare having received no formal instruction about their medical follow-up in adult age.

CONCLUSION

Although the quality of life of young adult survivors of childhood cancer as a whole does not seem very much altered, many of these survivors experience adverse sequelae warranting medical and psychological attention. Some of their preoccupations, such as worries about reproductive capacity and inheritability of their cancer, are often ignored.

Clinical heart failure in a cohort of children treated with anthracyclines: A long-term follow-up study

The cumulative incidence of anthracycline-induced clinical heart failure (A-CHF) in a large cohort of 830 children treated with a mean cumulative anthracycline dose of 288 mg/m2 (median 280 mg/m2; range 15-900 mg/m2) with a very long and complete follow-up after the start of anthracycline therapy (mean 8.5 years; median 7.1 years; range 0.01-28.4 years) was 2.5%. A cumulative anthracycline dose of 300 mg/m2 or more was the only independent risk factor (relative risk (RR)=8). The estimated risk of A-CHF increased with time to 5.5% at 20 years after the start of anthracycline therapy; 9.8% if treated with 300 mg/m2 or more. In conclusion, 1 in every 10 children treated with a cumulative anthracycline dose of 300 mg/m2 or more will eventually develop A-CHF. This is an extremely high risk and it reinforces the need of re-evaluating the cumulative anthracycline dose used in different treatment protocols and to define strategies to prevent A-CHF which could be implemented in treatment protocols.

Different dosage schedules for reducing cardiotoxicity in cancer patients receiving anthracycline chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The use of anthracycline chemotherapy is limited by the occurrence of cardiotoxicity. In an effort to prevent this cardiotoxicity, different anthracycline dosage schedules (i.e. peak doses and infusion durations) have been studied.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to determine the occurrence of cardiotoxicity with the use of different anthracycline dosage schedules in cancer patients.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the databases of The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), (The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to June 2004) and EMBASE (1980 to June 2004). In addition, we searched reference lists of relevant articles, conference proceedings and ongoing trials databases.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which different anthracycline dosage schedules were compared in cancer patients (children and adults).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently performed the study selection, quality assessment and data-extraction including adverse effects.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified six RCTs of varying quality addressing different anthracycline infusion durations (625 patients). The meta-analysis showed a statistically significant lower rate of clinical heart failure with an infusion duration of 6 hours or longer as compared to a shorter infusion duration, i.e. maximal duration of 1 hour (RR = 0.27; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09 to 0.81; 5 studies; 557 patients). In individual studies the infusion duration of 6 hours or longer also seemed to reduce the risk of subclinical cardiac damage. No statistically significant difference in response rate was found (RR = 0.83; 95% CI 0.45 to 1.54; 2 studies; 292 patients). No statistically significant difference in overall survival was found (HR = 1,42; 95% CI 0.61 to 3.30; 2 studies; 322 patients), but there was unexplained heterogeneity (I(2)=75%). No conclusions can be made regarding adverse effects. It should be emphasised that the majority of patients included in these studies were adults with different solid tumours. Children with leukaemia could not be included in the performed meta-analyses, but they were included in the descriptive results of non-pooled studies. No RCTs addressing different anthracycline peak doses with the same cumulative anthracycline dose in both treatment groups were identified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

An anthracycline infusion duration of six hours or longer reduces the risk of clinical heart failure, and it seems to reduce the risk of subclinical cardiac damage. There is no evidence which suggests a difference in response rate and survival between both treatment groups. Since there is only a small amount of data for children and also because data obtained in adults cannot be extrapolated to children, different anthracycline infusion durations should be evaluated further in children. For different anthracycline peak doses no high quality evidence was available and therefore, no definitive conclusions can be made about the occurrence of cardiotoxicity in patients treated with different anthracycline peak doses.

Anthracycline cardiotoxicity

The use of anthracyclines is limited by dose-dependent cardiotoxicity. Three forms of anthracycline cardiotoxicity are described; an immediate pericarditis-myocarditis syndrome, an early onset chronic progressive CHF developing during or shortly after therapy and late-onset cardiotoxicity presenting years following treatment. A number of risk factors have been reported, including; cumulative dose, administration schedule, mediastinal radiotherapy, old and young age, concurrent cardiovascular disease, combination therapy, gender, ethnicity and chromosomal abnormalities. Evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction has been widely adopted as a means of monitoring and assessing anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity. Biochemical markers and other techniques, such as endomyocardial biopsy, metaiodobenzylguanidine and indium-111-antimyosin scintigraphy are not routinely used. Methods employed to prevent cardiotoxicity include cumulative dose limitation, alteration of administration schedule, anthracycline analogues, liposomal formulations and the cardioprotective agent, dexrazoxane. With the growing number of paediatric malignancy survivors and the increasing use of anthracyclines in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer, the cardiotoxicity associated with these agents will remain a formidable issue for physicians. Further work is required to identify patients at increased risk of cardiotoxicity and to develop novel methods of protecting and treating this adverse effect.

Different anthracycline derivates for reducing cardiotoxicity in cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The use of anthracycline chemotherapy is limited by the occurrence of cardiotoxicity. In an effort to prevent this cardiotoxicity, different anthracycline derivates have been studied.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to determine the occurrence of cardiotoxicity with the use of different anthracycline derivates in cancer patients.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the databases of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2005) and EMBASE (1980 to April 2005). In addition, we searched reference lists of relevant articles, conference proceedings and ongoing trials databases.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which different anthracycline derivates were compared in cancer patients (children and adults).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently performed the study selection, quality assessment and data-extraction including adverse effects.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified five RCTs of varying quality addressing epirubicin versus doxorubicin (1036 patients) with the same dose. The meta-analysis showed no evidence for a significant difference in the occurrence of clinical heart failure between the treatment groups (RR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.12 to 1.11). However, there is some suggestion of a lower rate of clinical heart failure in patients treated with epirubicin. We identified two RCTs with varying quality addressing liposomal-encapsulated doxorubicin versus conventional doxorubicin (521 patients). The meta-analysis showed a significantly lower rate of both clinical heart failure and clinical and subclinical heart failure combined in patients treated with liposomal-encapsulated doxorubicin (RR = 0.20, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.75 and RR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.59 respectively). It should be noted that in one of the studies patients in the liposomal-encapsulated doxorubicin group received a higher cumulative anthracycline dose than patients in the doxorubicin group. For the other possible combinations of different anthracycline derivates only one RCT was identified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We are not able to favour either epirubicin or doxorubicin when given with the same dose. Based on the currently available evidence on heart failure, we conclude that in adults with a solid tumour liposomal-encapsulated doxorubicin should be favoured over doxorubicin. For both epirubicin versus doxorubicin and liposomal-encapsulated doxorubicin versus conventional doxorubicin no conclusions can be made about the effects of treatment in children treated with anthracyclines and also not in patients diagnosed with leukaemia. More research is needed. For other combinations of anthracycline derivates not enough evidence was available to make definitive conclusions about the occurrence of cardiotoxicity in patients treated with anthracyclines.

Primary bone osteosarcoma in the pediatric age: State of the art

The current combination treatment, chemotherapy and surgery, has significantly improved the cure rate and the survival rate of primary bone osteosarcoma. The 5-year survival rate has increased in the last 30 years from 10% to 70%. Even in patients with poor prognosis, such as those with metastases at diagnosis, the 5-year survival rate has reached 20-30% due to chemotherapy and the surgical removal of metastases and primary tumor. However, the most effective drugs are still the same as those employed over the last 20 years as front line neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy: Doxorubicin, Cisplatin, Methotrexate, Ifosfamide. No standard, second line therapy exists for those who relapse. At relapse, due to the lack of new non-cross-resistant drugs, surgery is still the main option when feasible. Other drugs have been employed in relapsed patients with poor results. This article reviews the state of the art of treatment for bone osteosarcoma in the pediatric age.

Clinical heart failure during pregnancy and delivery in a cohort of female childhood cancer survivors treated with anthracyclines

The cumulative incidence of peripartum anthracycline-induced clinical heart failure (A-CHF) was evaluated in a cohort of 53 childhood cancer survivors who had delivered one or more children. None of them developed peripartum A-CHF (cumulative incidence 0%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0-5.7%). The mean follow-up time after the first administration of anthracycline therapy was 20.3 years. They received a mean cumulative anthracycline dose of 267 mg/m2. It is worth noticing that even 2 patients with A-CHF before pregnancy did not develop peripartum A-CHF. Since there were no cases of peripartum A-CHF in our cohort, it was not possible to evaluate associated risk factors. In conclusion, this study demonstrates a low risk of developing peripartum A-CHF in childhood cancer survivors. However, more cohort studies with adequate power and long-term follow-up are needed to reliably evaluate the cumulative incidence of peripartum anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity (both clinical and asymptomatic) and associated risk factors.

Anticancer agents and cardiotoxicity

Although rare, cardiotoxicity is a significant complication of cancer treatment. The incidence and severity of cardiotoxicity are dependent on the type of drugs used, dose and schedule employed, and age of patients, as well as the presence of coexisting cardiac diseases and previous mediastinal irradiation. Anthracyclines are among one of the most active agents in oncology, but their use is often hampered by their cumulative dose-limiting cardiotoxicity. Combination therapy with new drugs in the last decade, such as taxanes and trastuzumab, in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer has yielded impressive results but also unexpected cardiotoxicity. Existing methods of minimizing cardiotoxicity include the use of protective agents such as dexrazoxane, different preparations of anthracyclines such as liposomal formulations, and alternative scheduling techniques. Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) with two-dimensional (2D)-echocardiography or radionuclide ventriculography (RNVG) remains the most pragmatic means of monitoring for cardiotoxicity. The increasing number of long-term survivors of pediatric cancers, as well as the use of trastuzumab, taxanes, and anthracyclines in adjuvant treatment of breast cancer, means that more than ever, cardiotoxicity will remain an important issue for clinicians.

Prospective longitudinal evaluation of doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy in sarcoma patients: a report of the late effects surveillance system (LESS)

BACKGROUND

Prospective longitudinal examinations of anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy in a homogeneous cohort are rare in pediatric oncology. We herein report the results of observations on the frequency of cardiomyopathy in doxorubicin-treated sarcoma patients in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.

PROCEDURE

The Late Effects Surveillance System (LESS) prospectively collects longitudinal data on late sequelae of antineoplastic therapy in Ewing-, soft tissue-, and osteosarcoma patients treated within the therapy trial protocols of the German Society of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology. Two hundred sixty-five relapse-free patients who had received doxorubicin for the treatment within the EICESS-92/EURO-E.W.I.N.G.-99, COSS-96, and CWS-96 therapy trials were serially examined by echocardiography. The analyzed population consisted of 142 males and 123 females. Their mean age at the end of therapy was 13 +/- 5 years. The mean follow-up time was 34 +/- 12 months. The mean cumulative doxorubicin dose was 290 +/- 91 mg/m(2).

RESULTS

In this cohort, the total cumulative incidence of doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy was 7.5%. Four patients (1.5%) suffered from a symptomatic cardiomyopathy and 16 (6%) from a subclinical cardiomyopathy. Cardiomyopathy manifested in 11 cases already under antineoplastic therapy and in the remaining nine cases at a median of 26 days (range: 17-174 days) after stopping antineoplastic therapy. Univariate and multivariable analysis did not confirm any of the known risk factors for developing anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy in our patient group within the described time interval.

CONCLUSIONS

After a mean follow-up of 34 +/- 12 months, cumulative incidence of doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy in our pediatric sarcoma patients was at the lower end of that reported by other groups.

Long-term follow-up of childhood cancer survivors: future directions for clinical care and research

Improvement in survival after childhood cancer has resulted in a growing population of childhood cancer survivors, causing the healthcare community to focus on providing appropriate care to the survivors, and addressing issues related to the etiology and prevention of long-term sequelae of cancer and its treatment. The overarching goal is to decrease the morbidity related to cancer treatment, and improve the overall quality of life, such that cancer survivors can successfully integrate back into society and lead productive lives. In order to achieve this goal, several issues need to be addressed, such as education of survivors and healthcare providers regarding the potential late effects; provision of standardized guidelines for appropriate follow-up of the survivors in a setting that is feasible and practical for the cancer survivor; ongoing communication between the cancer center that provided acute care for the patient and the healthcare facility providing follow-up care. Several challenges remain in addressing these issues, and will be the focus of this article.

Comparison of epirubicin and doxorubicin cardiotoxicity in children and adolescents treated within the German Cooperative Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study (CWS)

PURPOSE

Up to now, cardiotoxicity of epirubicin has been studied almost exclusively in adult cancer patients. The aim of this study was to investigate epirubicin in children and adolescents, in comparison with doxorubicin.

METHODS

About 172 soft tissue sarcoma patients (mean age at diagnosis: 8.3 years), treated with epirubicin (median cumulative dose: 450 mg/m2) or doxorubicin (median cumulative dose: 240 mg/m2) within the high-risk group of the CWS-96 study, were examined in a prospective multicentre study. Heart function was analysed by echocardiography, measuring left-ventricular fractional shortening (FS). The median follow up was 27.7 months.

RESULTS

Incidence of clinically manifest cardiomyopathy was 0% (0/60; 95% CI: 0-6.0%) in patients treated with epirubicin, and 0.9% (1/108; 95% CI: 0-5.1%) in patients treated with doxorubicin. A further three patients showed subclinical cardiomyopathy. There was no difference in FS between the two treatment arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiotoxicity was low in our study. For the short term, cardiotoxicity seems to be only a minor problem in patients treated with epirubicin as applied in this cohort.

Cardiac toxicity of high-dose chemotherapy

Cardiac toxicity is an uncommon but potentially serious complication of high-dose (HD) chemotherapy and little is known about incidence, severity and underlying mechanisms. We have systematically reviewed the literature of the last 30 years to summarize and appraise the published evidence on cardiac toxicity associated with HD chemotherapy. HD cyclophosphamide-containing regimens have been most commonly associated with cardiac toxicity, with a progressively decreasing incidence over time. Dosage, application regimens and coadministration of other chemotherapeutic agents emerged as risk factors. While cardiac toxicity has been rarely associated with other cytotoxic drugs, an unexpected incidence of severe cardiotoxicity resulted from reduced-intensity conditioning regimens containing melphalan and fludarabine. Predictive value of cardiologic examination of patients is limited, and patients with a slight depression of cardiac performance could tolerate HD chemotherapy. Clinical examination, resting electrocardiography and dosage adjustment in overweight patients remain the mainstay of prevention, with bidimensional echocardiography (2D echo) for patients with a history of anthracycline exposure. Strategies to decrease the long-term negative impact of anthracycline administration on cardiac performance are being investigated. New 2D echo-based techniques and circulating markers of cardiac function hold promise for allowing identification of patients at high risk for and early diagnosis of cardiac toxicity.

Cardioprotective interventions for cancer patients receiving anthracyclines

BACKGROUND

Anthracyclines are among the most effective chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of numerous malignancies. Unfortunately, their use is limited by a dose-dependent cardiotoxicity. In an effort to prevent this cardiotoxicity, different cardioprotective agents have been studied.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the efficacy of different cardioprotective agents in preventing heart damage in cancer patients treated with anthracyclines.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the databases of CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2002), MEDLINE (1966 to August 2002) and EMBASE (1980 to August 2002). In addition, we handsearched reference lists and conference proceedings of the International Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (1998 to 2002).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which any cardioprotective agent was compared to no additional or placebo therapy in cancer patients (children and adults) receiving anthracyclines.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently performed the study selection, quality assessment and data-extraction including adverse effects.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified RCTs for 5 cardioprotective agents: N-acetylcysteine (1 study; 54 patients), phenetylamines (2 studies; 100 patients), coenzyme Q10 (1 study; 20 patients), combination of vitamin E, vitamin C and N-acetylcysteine (1 study; 14 patients) and dexrazoxane (6 studies; 1013 patients). All studies had methodological limitations. Due to the insufficient number of studies, for the first four mentioned cardioprotective agents pooling of the results was impossible. None of the individual studies showed a cardioprotective effect. The meta-analysis of the dexrazoxane-studies showed a statistically significant benefit in favour of dexrazoxane for the occurrence of heart failure (Relative Risk (RR) = 0.28, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.18 to 0.42, P < 0.00001). No statistically significant difference in response rate between the dexrazoxane and control group was found (RR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.01, P = 0.06), but there was some suggestion that patients treated with dexrazoxane might have a lower anti-tumour response rate. Our meta-analysis of survival showed no significant difference between the dexrazoxane and control group. For adverse effects pooling was impossible. However, no important differences in the occurrence of side effects were found. The majority of the patients included in this meta-analysis were adults with advanced breast cancer.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

For cardioprotective agents for which pooling was impossible no high quality evidence was available and therefore, no definitive conclusions can be made about their efficacy. Dexrazoxane prevents heart damage, however there was some suggestion that patients treated with dexrazoxane might have a lower anti-tumour response rate. There was no significant difference in survival between the dexrazoxane and control group. We conclude that if the risk of cardiac damage is expected to be high, it might be justified to use dexrazoxane in patients with cancer treated with anthracyclines. However, for each individual patient clinicians should weigh the cardioprotective effect of dexrazoxane against the possible risk of a lower response rate.

Prognostic Value of Troponin I in Cardiac Risk Stratification of Cancer Patients Undergoing High-Dose Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

In patients with aggressive malignancies who are undergoing high-dose chemotherapy, even minimal elevation of troponin I (TnI) is associated with late left ventricular dysfunction. The time course of the subclinical myocardial damage and its impact on the clinical outcome have never been investigated previously.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 703 cancer patients, we measured TnI soon after chemotherapy (early TnI) and 1 month later (late TnI). Troponin was considered positive for values > or =0.08 ng/mL. Clinical and left ventricular ejection fraction evaluation (echocardiography) were performed before chemotherapy, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the end of the treatment, and again every 6 months afterward. Three different TnI patterns were identified, and patients were grouped accordingly. In 495 patients, both early and late TnI values were <0.08 ng/mL (TnI-/- group); in 145, there was only an early increase (TnI+/- group); and in 63 patients, both values increased (TnI+/+ group). In the TnI-/- group, no significant reduction in ejection fraction was observed during the follow-up, and there was a very low incidence of cardiac events (1%). In contrast, a greater incidence of cardiac events occurred in TnI-positive patients, particularly in the TnI(+/+) group (84% versus 37% in the TnI+/- group; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

TnI release pattern after high-dose chemotherapy identifies patients at different risks of cardiac events in the 3 years thereafter. This stratification allows us to differentiate the monitoring program and to plan, in selected patients, preventive strategies aimed at improving clinical outcome.

Cumulative incidence and risk factors of mitoxantrone-induced cardiotoxicity in children: a systematic review

Mitoxantrone is believed to maintain anthracycline antitumour activity but be associated with a reduced cardiotoxicity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the evidence for the cumulative incidence of and risk factors for mitoxantrone-induced cardiotoxicity (M-CT) in children treated for childhood cancers. After an extensive literature search, 17 studies were included. The cumulative incidence varied between 0 and 6.7% in the 16 studies evaluating symptomatic M-CT and between 0 and 80% in the 11 studies evaluating asymptomatic M-CT. Risk factors for developing M-CT remain unclear. All studies had serious methodological limitations. In conclusion, children treated with mitoxantrone are at risk of developing M-CT, but due to the low quality of the current evidence, the exact cumulative incidence and risk factors for M-CT remain unclear. It is too early to conclude that in children mitoxantrone is less cardiotoxic than anthracyclines. More well-designed studies are needed to reliably evaluate the incidence of M-CT and its associated risk factors.

Late effects among survivors of leukemia during childhood and adolescence

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common childhood malignancy, accounting for one-third of all cancers occurring in childhood and adolescents. Over the last 3 decades there has been a marked improvement in survival, with 5-year survival rates approaching 80%. With this improvement in survival, increasing attention is now being focused on issues relating to long-term morbidity and mortality associated with the treatments responsible for that increased survival. Because of the young age of these cancer survivors, and thus the potential longevity, the delayed consequences of therapy may have a significant impact on their lives. Long-term sequelae of treatment, such as impaired intellectual and psychomotor functioning, neuroendocrine abnormalities, impaired reproductive capacity, cardiotoxicity, and second malignant neoplasms, are now being reported with increasing frequency in this growing cohort of survivors and knowledge of the late -effects associated with cancer in children and adolescents continues to increase through ongoing research efforts. However, much of the available information relates to outcomes within the first decade following treatment, although information about the longer term outcomes that may occur later in adulthood is emerging as a result of well-conducted, large cohort studies. Through a multi-disciplinary approach to the diagnosis, treatment, and long-term follow-up of pediatric leukemia patients, we can achieve the goal of cure while minimizing the occurrence of long-term adverse outcomes. This review summarizes some of the well-described long-term consequences of therapy among children and adolescents treated for ALL.