TRK inhibitors in TRK fusion-positive cancers

Neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK) fusions and their role in cancer

Neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK) fusions are rare, therapeutically actionable, and, in some cases, diagnostic oncogenic events that can occur in a variety of adult and pediatric cancers. Cytopathologists need to be a familiar with the types of tumors that can harbor NTRK fusions to triage specimens accordingly for testing.

Diagnosis and management of tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) fusion sarcomas: expert recommendations from the World Sarcoma Network

Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of malignancies with mesenchymal lineage differentiation. The discovery of neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions as tissue-agnostic oncogenic drivers has led to new personalized therapies for a subset of patients with sarcoma in the form of tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors. NTRK gene rearrangements and fusion transcripts can be detected with different molecular pathology techniques, while TRK protein expression can be demonstrated with immunohistochemistry. The rarity and diagnostic complexity of NTRK gene fusions raise a number of questions and challenges for clinicians. To address these challenges, the World Sarcoma Network convened two meetings of expert adult oncologists and pathologists and subsequently developed this article to provide practical guidance on the management of patients with sarcoma harboring NTRK gene fusions. We propose a diagnostic strategy that considers disease stage and histologic and molecular subtypes to facilitate routine testing for TRK expression and subsequent testing for NTRK gene fusions.

Comparison of tyrosine kinase domain properties for the neurotrophin receptors TrkA and TrkB

The tropomyosin-related kinase (Trk) family consists of three receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) called TrkA, TrkB, and TrkC. These RTKs are regulated by the neurotrophins, a class of secreted growth factors responsible for the development and function of neurons. The Trks share a high degree of homology and utilize overlapping signaling pathways, yet their signaling is associated with starkly different outcomes in certain cancers. For example, in neuroblastoma, TrkA expression and signaling correlates with a favorable prognosis, whereas TrkB is associated with poor prognoses. To begin to understand how activation of the different Trks can lead to such distinct cellular outcomes, we investigated differences in kinase activity and duration of autophosphorylation for the TrkA and TrkB tyrosine kinase domains (TKDs). We find that the TrkA TKD has a catalytic efficiency that is ∼2-fold higher than that of TrkB, and becomes autophosphorylated in vitro more rapidly than the TrkB TKD. Studies with mutated TKD variants suggest that a crystallographic dimer seen in many TrkA (but not TrkB) TKD crystal structures, which involves the kinase-insert domain, may contribute to this enhanced TrkA autophosphorylation. Consistent with previous studies showing that cellular context determines whether TrkB signaling is sustained (promoting differentiation) or transient (promoting proliferation), we also find that TrkB signaling can be made more transient in PC12 cells by suppressing levels of p75NTR. Our findings shed new light on potential differences between TrkA and TrkB signaling, and suggest that subtle differences in signaling dynamics can lead to substantial shifts in the cellular outcome.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors for solid tumors in the past 20 years (2001-2020)

Tyrosine kinases are implicated in tumorigenesis and progression, and have emerged as major targets for drug discovery. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) inhibit corresponding kinases from phosphorylating tyrosine residues of their substrates and then block the activation of downstream signaling pathways. Over the past 20 years, multiple robust and well-tolerated TKIs with single or multiple targets including EGFR, ALK, ROS1, HER2, NTRK, VEGFR, RET, MET, MEK, FGFR, PDGFR, and KIT have been developed, contributing to the realization of precision cancer medicine based on individual patient's genetic alteration features. TKIs have dramatically improved patients' survival and quality of life, and shifted treatment paradigm of various solid tumors. In this article, we summarized the developing history of TKIs for treatment of solid tumors, aiming to provide up-to-date evidence for clinical decision-making and insight for future studies.

Molecular alterations and targeted therapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a malignancy characterized by a poor prognosis and high mortality rate. Genetic mutations and altered molecular pathways serve as targets in precise therapy. Using next-generation sequencing (NGS), these aberrant alterations can be identified and used to develop strategies that will selectively kill cancerous cells in patients with PDAC. The realization of targeted therapies in patients with PDAC may be summarized by three approaches. First, because oncogenes play a pivotal role in tumorigenesis, inhibition of dysregulated oncogenes is a promising method (Table 3). Numerous researchers are developing strategies to target oncogenes, such as KRAS, NRG1, and NTRK and related molecules, although most of the results are unsatisfactory. Accordingly, emerging strategies are being developed to target these oncogenes, including simultaneously inhibiting multiple molecules or pathways, modification of mutant residues by small molecules, and RNA interference. Second, researchers have attempted to reactivate inactivated tumour suppressors or modulate related molecules. TP53, CDKN2A and SMAD4 are three major tumour suppressors involved in PDAC. Advances have been achieved in clinical and preclinical trials of therapies targeting these three genes, and further investigations are warranted. The TGF-β-SMAD4 signalling pathway plays a dual role in PDAC tumorigenesis and participates in mediating tumour-stroma crosstalk and modulating the tumour microenvironment (TME); thus, molecular subtyping of pancreatic cancer according to the SMAD4 mutation status may be a promising precision oncology technique. Finally, genes such as KDM6A and BRCA have vital roles in maintaining the structural stability and physiological functions of normal chromosomes and are deficient in some patients with PDAC, thus serving as potential targets for correcting these deficiencies and precisely killing these aberrant tumour cells. Recent clinical trials, such as the POLO (Pancreas Cancer Olaparib Ongoing) trial, have reported encouraging outcomes. In addition to genetic event-guided treatment, immunotherapies such as chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T), antibody-drug conjugates, and immune checkpoint inhibitors also exhibit the potential to target tumours precisely, although the clinical value of immunotherapies as treatments for PDAC is still limited. In this review, we focus on recent preclinical and clinical advances in therapies targeting aberrant genes and pathways and predict the future trend of precision oncology for PDAC.

Beyond EGFR, ALK and ROS1: Current evidence and future perspectives on newly targetable oncogenic drivers in lung adenocarcinoma

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. In the past decade EGFR, ALK and ROS1 TKIs lead to an unprecedented survival improvement of oncogene-addicted NSCLC patients, with better toxicity profile compared to chemotherapy. In recent years the implementation of high-throughput sequencing platforms led to the identification of uncommon molecular alterations in oncogenic drivers, such as BRAF, MET, RET, HER2 and NTRK. Moreover, newly developed drugs have been found to be active against hard to target drivers, such as KRAS. Specific TKIs targeting these genomic alterations are currently in clinical development and showed impressive activity and survival improvement, leading to FDA-accelerated approval for some of them. However, virtually all patients develop resistance to TKIs by on-target or off-target mechanisms. Here we review the clinicopathological features, the emerging targeted therapies and mechanisms of resistance and strategies to overcome them of KRAS, BRAF, MET, RET, HER2 and NTRK-addicted advanced NSCLCs.

Targeted drug therapy in non-small cell lung cancer: Clinical significance and possible solutions-Part I

INTRODUCTION

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) comprises of 84% of all lung cancer cases. The treatment options for NSCLC at advanced stages are chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Chemotherapy involves conventional nonspecific chemotherapeutics, and targeted-protein/receptor-specific small molecule inhibitors. Biologically targeted therapies such as an antibody-based immunotherapy have been approved in combination with conventional therapeutics. Approved targeted chemotherapy is directed against the kinase domains of mutated cellular receptors such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinases (ALK), neurotrophic receptor kinases (NTRK) and against downstream signaling molecules such as BRAF (v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1). Approved biologically targeted therapy involves the use of anti-angiogenesis antibodies and antibodies against immune checkpoints.

AREAS COVERED

The rationale for the employment of targeted therapeutics and the resistance that may develop to therapy are discussed. Novel targeted therapeutics in clinical trials are also included.

EXPERT OPINION

Molecular and histological profiling of a given tumor specimen to determine the aberrant onco-driver is a must before deciding a targeted therapeutic regimen for the patient. Periodic monitoring of the patients response to a given therapeutic regimen is also mandatory so that any semblance of resistance to therapy can be deciphered and the regimen may be accordingly altered.

Intracranial disease control for EGFR-mutant and ALK-rearranged lung cancer with large volume or symptomatic brain metastases

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are commonly employed for patients with brain metastases from lung cancer and specific driver mutations. We sought to identify the correlation between intracranial tumor burden and outcomes in patients with brain metastases treated with TKIs.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We identified and retrospectively reviewed cases of EGFR-mutant or ALK-rearranged lung cancer with brain metastases at any time during their cancer course. Clinical characteristics and treatment information were abstracted from the medical records. Brain metastases were contoured to calculate total volume of disease at diagnosis and after initial therapy. High intracranial burden was defined as either > 10 brain metastases, volume of brain metastases > 15 cc, or largest lesion > 3 cm. Intracranial response was determined according to Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria on the patient level. We determined the correlation between clinical and imaging characteristics and intracranial progression free survival (IC-PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients with EGFR (n = 49) and ALK (n = 8) alterations were identified. Median follow-up from initial brain metastasis diagnosis was 17 months. Neurological symptoms were present in 54% at brain metastasis diagnosis. For those receiving TKIs alone or TKIs with radiation, at least a partial intracranial response (≥ 65% volume reduction) at 3 months from starting therapy was achieved in 94% and 58%. Progressive intracranial disease at 3 months occurred in 6.3% and 8.3%. Patients with high intracranial burden (n = 21) had a median 17 brain metastases, 6.5 cc volume, and 1.9 cm maximal tumor diameter. Median IC-PFS and OS for patients with high intracranial burden was 13.9 and 35.4 months. Patients with high intracranial burden and neurological symptoms at diagnosis had similar IC-PFS and OS compared to those with low burden and absence of neurological symptoms (p > 0.05 for each).

CONCLUSION

Most patients receiving TKIs as part of their initial therapy achieve an early and durable volumetric intracranial response, irrespective of presenting disease burden or neurologic symptoms.

Targeting molecular subtypes in solid cancers: successes and failures

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We herein review some of the major patterns of resistance and lessons learned from the use of earlier targeted therapies in two genotype-driven solid tumors.

RECENT FINDINGS

Targeted agents have rapidly expanded in the field of oncology over the past 2 decades. The breakthroughs achieved by these agents have been, however, hindered by the inevitable development of drug resistance. Intrinsic or acquired mechanisms of resistance eventually lead to treatment tolerance and tumoral plasticity with phenotypic switch and evasion of the original targeted pathway. Failures in such therapies also result from poor selectivity of the target, drug delivery, and unaffordable costs.

SUMMARY

Based on above findings, collaborative efforts are advancing at the molecular level to design better drugs or combinatorial strategies and to develop more sensitive assays to monitor responses and the emergence of resistance.

Glioblastoma in adults: a Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and European Society of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) consensus review on current management and future directions

Glioblastomas are the most common form of malignant primary brain tumor and an important cause of morbidity and mortality. In recent years there have been important advances in understanding the molecular pathogenesis and biology of these tumors, but this has not translated into significantly improved outcomes for patients. In this consensus review from the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO), the current management of isocitrate dehydrogenase wildtype (IDHwt) glioblastomas will be discussed. In addition, novel therapies such as targeted molecular therapies, agents targeting DNA damage response and metabolism, immunotherapies, and viral therapies will be reviewed, as well as the current challenges and future directions for research.

Evaluating entrectinib as a treatment option for non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Entrectinib, an oral pan-TRK, ALK, and ROS1 inhibitor is approved as a first-line treatment for NTRK-rearranged solid tumors and ROS1-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It has demonstrated clinical efficacy for patients harboring the relevant gene rearrangement in both systemic and intracranial disease, regardless of the tumor type.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors analyzed data from preclinical and clinical studies, the characteristics of entrectinib compared to those of other relevant inhibitors (currently available and/or under investigation), and the emerging resistance mechanisms. The authors then provide the readers with their future perspectives.

EXPERT OPINION

Entrectinib has been well studied across many tumor types, including NSCLC with ALK, ROS1, and NTRK rearrangements. The drug has demonstrated favorable properties with oral administration, prolonged response duration, high intracranial efficacy, and a favorable toxicity profile. However, with acquisition of resistance and the development of newer generation TKIs, the optimal place for entrectinib in the landscape of targeted therapies for NSCLC warrants further validation.

Larotrectinib followed by selitrectinib in a novel DCTN1-NTRK1 fusion undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma

INTRODUCTION

Neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase fusions cause overexpression or activation of kinase and are believed to confer oncogenic potential in some non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas. TRK inhibitors have recently been shown to induce responses in these tumours though current experience with these agents is still limited.

CASE REPORT

We report a case of an adolescent with treatment-refractory non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas, carrying a novel DCTN1-NTRK1 gene fusion whose progressive disease was treated with multi-kinase and TRK inhibitors.Management and outcome: Our patient was started on pan-TRK inhibitor larotrectinib, as his disease progressed after chemotherapy, radiation therapy and surgery, based on next-generation sequencing test showing DCTN1-NTRK1 gene fusion. He responded quickly to larotrectinib with the improvement of symptoms and reduction of masses. However, this response was short-lived due to the development of acquired solvent front resistance mutation. This patient did not respond to next-generation TRK inhibitor selitrectinib and eventually succumbed to his disease.

DISCUSSION

The initial rapid and drastic response of our patient to larotrectinib was not sustained due to the development of acquired resistance. This case emphasizes the need for upfront and periodic next-generation sequencing testing to guide treatment of patients with refractory non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas.

Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Current Challenges and Future Prospects

Despite advances, patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) still have poor long-term survival. Identification of molecular subtypes is important to guide therapy through standard treatment pathways and holds promise for the development of new treatments. Following standard first- and second-line chemotherapy plus targeted agents, many patients retain a reasonable performance status, and thus are seeking further effective treatment to extend life and maintain symptom control. The challenge lies in selecting the most appropriate therapy in the third- and fourth-line settings, from a range of options including the relatively new oral agents TAS-102 and regorafenib, or rechallenge with previous chemotherapy or anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (mAB). Beyond this, therapy consists of trials involving novel agents and new combinations of treatments with theoretical synergy and/or non-overlapping toxicity. There is a great focus on enhancing immunogenicity in mCRC, to reflect the impressive results of immunotherapy drugs in the small cohort with mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) mCRC. Rare molecular subtypes of mCRC are increasingly being identified, including Her2-positive disease, NTRK fusions and others. Clinical trials exploring the efficacy of immunomodulatory and precision agents are plentiful and will hopefully yield clinically meaningful results that can be rapidly translated into routine care.

Molecular and clinicopathologic features of gliomas harboring NTRK fusions

Fusions involving neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) genes are detected in ≤2% of gliomas and can promote gliomagenesis. The remarkable therapeutic efficacy of TRK inhibitors, which are among the first Food and Drug Administration-approved targeted therapies for NTRK-fused gliomas, has generated significant clinical interest in characterizing these tumors. In this multi-institutional retrospective study of 42 gliomas with NTRK fusions, next generation DNA sequencing (n = 41), next generation RNA sequencing (n = 1), RNA-sequencing fusion panel (n = 16), methylation profile analysis (n = 18), and histologic evaluation (n = 42) were performed. All infantile NTRK-fused gliomas (n = 7) had high-grade histology and, with one exception, no other significant genetic alterations. Pediatric NTRK-fused gliomas (n = 13) typically involved NTRK2, ranged from low- to high-histologic grade, and demonstrated histologic overlap with desmoplastic infantile ganglioglioma, pilocytic astrocytoma, ganglioglioma, and glioblastoma, among other entities, but they rarely matched with high confidence to known methylation class families or with each other; alterations involving ATRX, PTEN, and CDKN2A/2B were present in a subset of cases. Adult NTRK-fused gliomas (n = 22) typically involved NTRK1 and had predominantly high-grade histology; genetic alterations involving IDH1, ATRX, TP53, PTEN, TERT promoter, RB1, CDKN2A/2B, NF1, and polysomy 7 were common. Unsupervised principal component analysis of methylation profiles demonstrated no obvious grouping by histologic grade, NTRK gene involved, or age group. KEGG pathway analysis detected methylation differences in genes involved in PI3K/AKT, MAPK, and other pathways. In summary, the study highlights the clinical, histologic, and molecular heterogeneity of NTRK-fused gliomas, particularly when stratified by age group.

JSCO-ESMO-ASCO-JSMO-TOS: international expert consensus recommendations for tumour-agnostic treatments in patients with solid tumours with microsatellite instability or NTRK fusions

A Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (JSCO)-hosted expert meeting was held in Japan on 27 October 2019, which comprised experts from the JSCO, the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO), the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and the Taiwan Oncology Society (TOS). The purpose of the meeting was to focus on what we have learnt from both microsatellite instability (MSI)/deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) biomarkers in predicting the efficacy of anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) immunotherapy, and the neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions in predicting the efficacy of inhibitors of the tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) proteins across a range of solid tumour types. The recent regulatory approvals of the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab and the TRK inhibitors larotrectinib and entrectinib, based on specific tumour biomarkers rather than specific tumour type, have heralded a paradigm shift in cancer treatment approaches. The purpose of the meeting was to develop international expert consensus recommendations on the use of such tumour-agnostic treatments in patients with solid tumours. The aim was to generate a reference document for clinical practice, for pharmaceutical companies in the design of clinical trials, for ethics committees in the approval of clinical trial protocols and for regulatory authorities in relation to drug approvals, with a particular emphasis on diagnostic testing and patient selection.

Novel Therapies for Glioblastoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor, and the available treatment options are limited. This article reviews the recent preclinical and clinical investigations that seek to expand the repertoire of effective medical and radiotherapy options for GBM.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent phase III trials evaluating checkpoint inhibition did not result in significant survival benefit. Select vaccine strategies have yielded promising results in early phase clinical studies and warrant further validation. Various targeted therapies are being explored but have yet to see breakthrough results. In addition, novel radiotherapy approaches are in development to maximize safe dose delivery. A multitude of preclinical and clinical studies in GBM explore promising immunotherapies, targeted agents, and novel radiation modalities. Recent phase III trial failures have once more highlighted the profound tumor heterogeneity and diverse resistance mechanisms of glioblastoma. This calls for the development of biomarker-driven and personalized treatment approaches.

How Technology Is Improving the Multidisciplinary Care of Sarcoma

Sarcomas are rare tumors but comprise a wide histologic spectrum. Advances in technology have emerged to address the biologic complexity and challenging diagnosis and treatment of this disease. The diagnostic approach to sarcomas has historically been based on morphologic features, but technologic advances in immunohistochemistry and cytogenetic/molecular testing have transformed the interdisciplinary work-up of mesenchymal neoplasms in recent years. On the therapeutic side, technologic advances in the delivery of radiation have made it a linchpin in the treatment of localized and oligometastatic sarcoma. In this review, we discuss recent advances in the pathologic diagnosis of sarcomas and discuss select sarcoma types that illustrate how newly discovered diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers have refined existing classification schemes and substantially shaped our diagnostic approach. Such examples include conventional and epithelioid malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs), emerging entities in the group of round cell sarcomas, and other mesenchymal neoplasms with distinct cytogenetic aberrations. Recent advances in radiation oncology, including intensity-modulated, stereotactic, MRI-guided, and proton radiotherapy (RT), will be reviewed in the context of neoadjuvant or adjuvant localized soft-tissue sarcoma and oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease. Innovations in translational research are expected to be introduced into clinical practice over the next few years and will likely continue to affect the rapidly evolving field of sarcoma diagnostics and therapy.

Entrectinib for the treatment of metastatic NSCLC: safety and efficacy

Introduction: Gene fusions are strong driver alterations in various cancers, increasingly diagnosed with multiple testing techniques. ROS1 fusions can be found in 1-2% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and several tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been tested in this oncogene-driven disease. NTRK fusions are characteristic of a few rare types of cancer, also infrequently seen in some common cancers including NSCLC. Entrectinib is a newer ROS1 and NTRK inhibitor developed across different tumor types harboring rearrangements in these genes. Entrectinib was granted FDA accelerated approval in August 2019 for the treatment of ROS1+ NSCLC and NTRK-driven solid tumors.Areas covered: This review covers the mechanism of action, safety, and efficacy of entrectinib in patients with metastatic NSCLC.Expert opinion: Entrectinib is an orally bioavailable TKI of TrkA, TrkB, TrkC, and ROS1, with the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. Entrectinib was effective and well-tolerated in patients harboring ROS1- or NTRK-rearranged NSCLC treated within phase I and II studies. Entrectinib appears to be the most appropriate treatment choice for TKIs-naïve patients, especially in those presenting brain metastasis. Conversely, in case of systemic progression with the evidence of acquired resistance mutations in ROS1 or Trk proteins, a sequential therapy with entrectinib could not be successful.

Breast Cancer, Version 3.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Several new systemic therapy options have become available for patients with metastatic breast cancer, which have led to improvements in survival. In addition to patient and clinical factors, the treatment selection primarily depends on the tumor biology (hormone-receptor status and HER2-status). The NCCN Guidelines specific to the workup and treatment of patients with recurrent/stage IV breast cancer are discussed in this article.

Tumour-agnostic drugs in paediatric cancers

The recognition that new cancer drugs can be truly tumour-agnostic based on mechanism-of-action is important for paediatric cancers, where access to novel targeted therapies developed for adult indications has sometimes been problematic. The recently approved drug larotrectinib is an excellent case study of the development of a tumour-agnostic drug relevant to children.

Brain Metastases in Lung Cancers with Emerging Targetable Fusion Drivers

The management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has transformed with the discovery of therapeutically tractable oncogenic drivers. In addition to activating driver mutations, gene fusions or rearrangements form a unique sub-class, with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) targeted agents approved as the standard of care in the first-line setting for advanced disease. There are a number of emerging fusion drivers, however, including neurotrophin kinase (NTRK), rearrangement during transfection (RET), and neuregulin 1 (NRG1) for which there are evolving high-impact systemic treatment options. Brain metastases are highly prevalent in NSCLC patients, with molecularly selected populations such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant and ALK-rearranged tumors particularly brain tropic. Accordingly, there exists a substantial body of research pertaining to the understanding of brain metastases in such populations. Little is known, however, on the molecular mechanisms of brain metastases in those with other targetable fusion drivers in NSCLC. This review encompasses key areas including the biological underpinnings of brain metastases in fusion-driven lung cancers, the intracranial efficacy of novel systemic therapies, and future directions required to optimize the control and prevention of brain metastases.